Sian Rees 2015 MPA Site Integrity

14
What is site integrity? Applying current ecological knowledge to evolving marine policy. Siân E. Rees a *, Emma V. Sheehan a , Emma L. Jackson a , Sarah C. Gall a , Sophie L. Cousens a , Jean-Luc Solandt b , Matthew Boyer c , Martin J. Attrill a a Marine Institute. Plymouth University. b Marine Conservation Society. c Matthew Boyer Solicitors © Colin Munro

description

A legal and ecological perspective of ‘site integrity’ to inform policy development and management of Special Areas of Conservation in Europe.Siân E. Rees1, Emma V. Sheehan1, Emma L. Jackson4, Sarah C. Gall1, Sophie L. Cousens1, Jean-Luc Solandt2, Matthew Boyer3, Martin J. Attrill11 Marine Institute. Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, U.K. 2 Marine Conservation Society, Unit 3, Wolf Business Park, Herefordshire, HR9 5NB, U.K.3 Matthew Boyer Solicitors. Appletree Barn, Chagford, Devon, TQ13 8JQ. U.K.4 Central Queensland University, School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Bryan Jordan Drive, PO Box 1319, Gladstone Queensland 4680, Australia.The European Union Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) provides for the designation and management of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and requires that impacting activities are subject to ‘an appropriate assessment’ of their implications for the ‘integrity’ of the site. We define the term ‘site integrity’ from a legal and an ecological perspective. We demonstrate that ‘site integrity’ is the maintenance of ecological processes and functions that support the wider delivery of ecosystem services. ‘Site integrity’ can be influenced by SAC management. Management that seeks to support ‘site integrity’ may include the use of buffer zones or connecting areas that extend beyond the SAC site’s designated features. We conclude that ‘site integrity’ and ‘favourable conservation status’ are powerful legal terms that if fully transposed into the law and policy of Member States can enable the achievement of broader European and International goals for marine conservation.

Transcript of Sian Rees 2015 MPA Site Integrity

  • What is site integrity? Applying current ecological knowledge to evolving marine policy.

    Sin E. Reesa*, Emma V. Sheehana, Emma L. Jacksona, Sarah C. Galla, Sophie L. Cousensa, Jean-Luc Solandtb, Matthew Boyerc, Martin J. Attrilla

    a Marine Institute. Plymouth University. b Marine Conservation Society. cMatthew Boyer Solicitors

    Colin

    Munro

  • European Union Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)

    Article 6.1 requires the establishment of necessary conservation measures corresponding to the ecological requirements of the Annex I habitats and the Annex II species present at the sites

    Article 6.2 requires Member States to take appropriate steps to avoid, in the special areas of conservation, the deterioration of natural habitats and species as well as disturbance of the species for which the areas have been designated

    Article 6.3 requires an appropriate assessment of the implications of plans or projects for the site, in view of its conservation objectives. The plan or project may only be granted permission to proceed if it can be ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned

  • Most SACs remain multiple use

    On-going activities that pre-date SAC designation (including licenced fishing) need not be subject to an appropriate assessment

    Only the Annex I or II habitat or species is considered

  • A change.

    European Court of Justice demonstrate that the protection offered to SACs by Articles 6.2. and 6.3 of the Habitats Directive is equal ('the Waddenzee case' Case C-127/02 2004; Commission v French Republic Case C-241/08, 2010; Commission v Ireland Case C-418/04, 2007).

  • The UK Government is in breach of Article 6.2 for failing to deal with damaging fishing activity within SACs that leads to deterioration of natural habitats and Article 6.3 for failing to subject fishing license grants and renewals to appropriate assessments (Client Earth and Marine Conservation Society, 2011).

    Image Spike Searle

  • Science/Policy into SAC Management

    Clarify site integrity from a legal perspective and an ecological perspective

    Demonstrate how site integrity is linked to marine features

    Demonstrate how site integrity can be influenced by management

  • Lyme Bay

  • What is site integrity?

  • What is site integrity?Legal

    Site is a geographically defined area whose extent is clearly delineated (Article 1(j) of the Habitats Directive).

    The overarching requirement of the Habitats Directive is to achieve favourable conservation status of Annex I habitats and Annex II species (Articles 3.1 and 4.4).

    Article 1(e) that the conservation status of a designated habitat will only be taken to be favourable when the conservation status of its typical species is itself favourable.

    The EC Guidance (2000) states that the integrity of the site may be defined as the coherence of the sites ecological structure and function, across its whole area. A site can be described as having a high degree of integrity where the inherent potential for meeting site conservation objectives is realised, the capacity for self-repair and self-renewal under dynamic conditions is maintained(European Commission 2000).

  • Ecological functions* Ecological processes*

    Habitats

    Annex I reef habitata Production

    Primary production; secondary

    production; larval/gamete supply;

    formation of species habitat;

    species diversification; formation of

    physical barriers

    Species

    Alcyonium digitatumb

    Dead mans fingers

    Production; geological

    processes; ecological

    interactions

    Formation of species habitat;

    species diversification; food web

    dynamics

    Axinella dissimilisb

    Erect branching sponge

    Production; geological

    processes; ecological

    interactions

    Formation of species habitat;

    species diversification; food web

    dynamics

    Eunicella verrucosac,d,e

    Pink sea fan

    Production; geological

    processes; ecological

    interactions

    Formation of species habitat;

    species diversification; food web

    dynamics

    Leptopsammia pruvotic,d,e,f

    Sunset cup coral

    Production; ecological

    interactionsFormation of species habitat

    Pentapora fascialisb

    Ross coral

    Production; geological

    processes; ecological

    interactions

    Formation of species habitat;

    species diversification; food web

    dynamicsa Habitats Directive (REF)bNationally important marine featurescWildlife & Countryside Act 1981dthe UK Biodiversity Action Plan 1995 (UK BAP)eThe International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red Data ListfConvention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES)

    All images from MarLIN website. www.marlin.ac.uk

    cSAC Annex I reef features, their associated (typical) species of conservation importance, ecological function, and ecological processes

    * Fletcher, S., Saunders, J., Herbert, R., Roberts, C. and Dawson, K. 2012. Description of the ecosystem services provided by broad-scale habitats and features of conservation importance that are likely to be protected by Marine Protected Areas in the Marine Conservation Zone Project area. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number 088.

  • Supporting the social-ecological system

  • Management and site integrity Recovery of the Annex I reef habitat (Sheehan et al 2013; PLoS ONE 8(12))

    Recovery has also been observed for certain individual species (such as the ross coral (Pentapora fascialis), sea squirt (Phallusia mammillata) and king scallop (Pecten maximus) (Sheehan et al 2013; PLoS ONE 8(12))

    Positive socio economic effects for the recreation industry (Rees et al 2014 in prep)

    Positive socio economic effects for fishers using pots and nets (Mangi et al 2011; Ambio)

    Recovery between the reefs (Sheehan et al 2013; Marine Pollution Bulletin).

  • Some points to take forward?

    Site Integrity and Appropriate Assessments

    Site v Feature based management

    include typical species in appropriate assessments?

    Allow for self-repair and self-renewal within the site (e.g. between the reefs, storms)

    Cumulative effects?

  • With thanks:[email protected]@Dr_Sian_Rees

    Rees, S.E., Sheehan, E.V., Jackson, E.L., Gall, S.C., Cousens, S.L., Solandt, J.-L., Boyer, M., Attrill, M.J., 2013. A legal and ecological perspective of site integrity to inform policy development and management of Special Areas of Conservation in Europe. Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 72 (1) 14-21.