8/3/2019 Shrinking Brain

1/4

Shrinking Brain?

RED ALERT!!!! THE HUMAN BRAIN HAS BEEN SHRINKING FORTHOUSANDS OF YEARS

Most people dont know this but the human brain has shrunk dramatically through themillennia of the history of mankind.Scientists are in some disagreement as to whether this shrinkage started thirty thousand yearsago, or ten thousand years ago, but they agree that the brain has shrunk by 8-10%. The brain

has in fact been shrinking for the past 100,000 years albeit at a slower rate.

Another conundrum for evolutionary biologists is why the human brain evolved to be so bigin the first place! It gobbles up an extraordinary amount of energy. It only takes up 2% of our

body weight, but uses 20-25% of our energy intake far more than any other organ. The morethe brain grows, the more energy and nutrients it takes away from other vital organs.

The necessity for such a large brain in evolutionary terms was thrown in doubt by ProfessorJohn Lorbers study detailing individuals who somehow managed to function normally withan IQ over a hundred with nothing more than a sliver of brain tissue. One boy had an IQ of126 and a first class honours degree in mathematics, despite the fact he had virtually no

brain. A CAT scan showed the boys skull was lined with a thin layer of brain cells to a

millimeter in thickness. The rest of his skull was filled with cerebrospinal fluid. The youngman continued a normal life with virtually no brain.

From over 600 scans of people with hydrocephalus Lorber documented that just under 10%had 95% of the cranial cavity filled with cerebrospinal fluid. Half of this group were

profoundly retarded. The remaining half had IQs greater than 100. Sceptics have claimed thatit was an error of interpretation of the scans themselves. Lorber himself admits that reading aCAT scan can be tricky. He also has said that he would not make such a claim withoutevidence. In answer to attacks that he has not precisely measured the amount of brain tissuemissing, he added, I cant say whether the mathematics student has a brain weighing 50grams or 150 grams, but it is clear that it is nowhere near the normal 1.5 kilograms.

All this brings up startling questions:

WHY DID THE HUMAN BRAIN GROW TO BE SO UNNECESSARILY LARGE INTERMS OF OUR EVOLUTIONARY SURVIVAL AND PROGRESS?WHY DID THE BRAIN MAINTAIN THIS SIZE FOR SO LONG DESPITE THE FACTTHAT IT USED UP SO MUCH ENERGY?WHY DID IT SUDDENLY START TO SHRINK 30,000 YEARS AGO? IF THE SIZE OFTHE BRAIN IS A SIGN OF THE EVOLUTIONARY PROGRESS OF AN ORGANISM,DOES THAT MEAN THAT WE ARE WE NOW DEVOLVING? IF A SMALLER BRAINIS ALL THATS NECESSARY IN EVOLUTIONARY TERMS, HOW DID THE BRAINGET TO BE SO BIG IN THE FIRST PLACE?

I am reminded of a book called The Song Of The Greys by Nigel Kerner.

Of all the humanoid alien types that feature in reports of sightings and abductions, the mostcommon is the Grey smooth and sallow-skinned, small in stature, spindly and thin. Who

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0340695811/worldmyster07-20/http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0340695811/worldmyster07-20/

8/3/2019 Shrinking Brain

2/4

are they? Where do they come from? What do they want from us?They have programmed in to their intercepted lines of mankind all the mechanisms necessaryto keep their experiments intact and functioning. Racism and tribalism are a case in point.What better way to keep experimental groups separate in order to avoid one experimentleaking into another and affecting the final result, than to programme separatism and tribal

identity into the experimental subjects. Source: An Interview with KernerIn 1998 when the book was published, long before this affirmation about the shrinking brainsize, he made a stunning case for the suggestion that we did not evolve from a sea-worm. Wedevolved from something much much better than we are now. The large brain is just aremnant of what we once were, thats why its shrinking. Kerner also suggests that the 95% ofthe human genome that does not seem to code for proteins was also at one time in the ancient

past used in full. We have, in other words, lost 95% of our potential through devolution.

This is not the first time Ive found confirmations for stuff in this book. Kerner insists in thebook that human lineage includes a Neanderthal input. Research into mitochondrial DNAclaimed to prove that this was impossible. But research published last year suggests that

Neanderthals may well have contributed to the human gene pool after all. (The Neanderthal

Within New Scientist 03 March 2007.)

In fact several of Kerners suggestions in the book seem to be have come almost propheticallytrue since the book was written. I read it last year and the amount of things he mentions thathave already happened is unbelievable.

Kerners not a creationist though thank God!! If he were Id have put the book down sharpish.He suggests that the difference between us and the animals is freedom of scope, freedom toknow, be aware of and make a vast range of choices outside the status quo. So, if we aredevolving, we had more freedom of scope in the past and if you trace that right back to our

beginnings, we would have been perfectly free with no limit. That perfect freedom you couldcall God and Kerner does. But the refreshing difference is that he says we made our own

free choices to understand what it might be like not to be perfectly free. We chose toexperience the one thing we couldnt experience from the state of perfect freedom limit. IfGod is all knowing, says Kerner, then that knowing would kind of have to include aknowledge of what its like not to know all. Sound strange? It wont if you read the book andsee the full argument. It was just what I was looking for, as I could never relate to a creatorGod, but could never figure how our existence could be explained without one.

So basically, Kerner says that humankind in the past was a less hard wired more ephemeralsort of being that gradually devolved into a more and more physical type of being through theaction of the second law of thermodynamics, with time, to a point where we became a sort ofmonkey man.

Another angle on this is his radical and extraordinary theory involving the Grey aliens thatfeature in reports of alien abduction. He suggests that when we reached our currentdevolutionary point we became susceptible to interference by these entities that come fromelsewhere in the universe. These alien biological robots (he calls roboids) are, he says,genetically engineering us to serve their purposes to this day. This interference has modifiedour present form of Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Could the creation story of Adam & Eve describe

just such a genetic engineering exercise, he asks. Could the taking of Adams rib to make Evedescribe a cloning procedure?

He claims there were many more of these genetic interceptions previous to this. All of themleading to a point where these alien things harvest some of us for what he calls our soulfields. A soul is the only eternal mechanism in a universe of diminishing returns, as

Kerner puts it.

http://www.karmapolis.be/pipeline/interview_kerner_uk.htmhttp://www.karmapolis.be/pipeline/interview_kerner_uk.htm

8/3/2019 Shrinking Brain

3/4

He asks: Could we have DNA codes in us now that bear the hallmark of that interception? Hethen names specific DNA codes, they call them trinucleotide repeats and alas, they seem toresemble something that a cloning mechanism would produce. The biggest irony, he says, isthat the Greys dont realise that they cant, with physical means, get a handle on somethingthats not physical, simply because they only understand the physical. So the tragedy lies in

the damage they do in trying to reach what they cant reach. Converting us, via abduction andgenetic manipulation, to be more like them, in the vain hope that they can bridge into oursouls that way. Making us, in other words, more like machines.

Kerner gives evidence to show that the great religious teachers, including Christ, came towarn us of this fact. More disturbingly he claims the UFO phenomenon is in fact theharbinger of this mal-intent on the part of this alien power and it continues to this day. Acontinuity that may well end in the final harvest of those whom he suggests are the moresuitable types of human for an alien purpose: The Euro-Caucasian genotype.

Read this hugely interesting book and youll find it explains most of the conundrums we nowface through scientific discoveries and actually ties in and affirms religious belief in aGodhead, in a way that is quite brilliantly logical. The book was first published in 1998 so its

out of print, but I searched around and found that you can still get it from the books websitewww.songofthegreys.com I bought this book for every member of my family. I believe it isthe greatest favour I could do them in this world.

Bigger brains than necessary, shrinking brains with time, evolution?????I dont think so.

Copyright 2008 by Tony Davidson

Related Articles

Popular Tags: aliengray aliens history of mankindhuman brain human evolution Kernerscience shrinking size strange

{ 2 comments read them below oradd one }

salamNovember 9, 2010 at 3:20 am

we must agree in one thing..that size doesnt give any effect for the functions of thebrain..God makes us with reasons (that we cant imagined it)..all that God creatednever be a wasted..God makes a big brain, maybe it is a suitable size to fit during the

period..and maybe most suitable size in recent time, is the smaller size..never say thatbrain was made in large size then shrunk because some of the part was useless..(sorryfor my bad english)

Reply

Ron O. CookNovember 19, 2010 at 10:20 pm

THE HUMAN BRAIN IS NOT THE SEAT OF PHYSICAL EXPRESSIONIT IS ATOOL FOR THIS SIDE OF TIMELESSNESS.

Mind may seek itself in exponential feedback waves that are everywhere at once yetholographically focused by a reflection mechanism on the physical side called a Brain(gestalt / sequential computerized device). Such a virtual organ can and does make

http://www.songofthegreys.com/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/alien/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/alien/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/gray-aliens/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/gray-aliens/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/history-of-mankind/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/history-of-mankind/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/human-brain/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/human-brain/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/human-evolution/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/kerner/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/kerner/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/science-2/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/science-2/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/shrinking-size/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/strange/http://www.enigmni.com/http://www.enigmni.com/http://www.songofthegreys.com/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/alien/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/gray-aliens/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/history-of-mankind/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/human-brain/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/human-evolution/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/kerner/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/science-2/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/shrinking-size/http://blog.world-mysteries.com/tag/strange/http://www.enigmni.com/

8/3/2019 Shrinking Brain

4/4

localizations think they are individuals capable of god-like creation. It is an illusionthat must be learned due to sequential limitations. We are one. Individuals created inlocalizations use brains as a secondary focusing agent to create a holographic virtualdomain wherein personality rises. Personalities create dimensional illusions that fluxand must be reinforced by recognition or observation from others. These brains

coalesce mind into a sense field capable of creating solid reality. This virtual reality ishard copy to a conscious mind aided by a lens of being. The lens collects data forevaluation by the All.