Should We Stop TAP Block
Transcript of Should We Stop TAP Block
Should we stop TAP blocks?
by Dr Beh
• Prospective blinded study
• To evaluate with US the placement of the
needle tip and LA during TAP blocks using
landmark-based ‘double pop’ technique
TAP blocks
• One of the techniques of abdominal wall nerve blocks
• Abdominal wall nerve blocks have been used in anaesthesia for surgery involving the anterior abdominal wall for several decades.
Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 1024–6
1980s – A technique involving multiple injections of local anaesthetic in the abdominal wall was used
History
Atkinson R, Rushman G, Lee J. A synopsis of anaesthesia, 10th ed.Bristol: Wright, 1987: 637-640.
Blind landmark - lumbar triangle of Petit
1st pop
2nd pop
blunt needle make the loss of resistance more
appreciable
20 – 30ml LA (any %) This block relies on LA
spread rather than concentration
TAP blocks
• Provide excellent intra-op & post-op
analgesia, decrease opioid requirement,
allow patients to breathe and cough
more comfortably, and facilitate early
mobilization & discharge
TAP blocks
TAP blocks
• Is particularly useful for cases when an epidural is contraindicated or refused
• Can be performed unilaterally (e.g. appendicectomy), or bilaterally when the incision crosses the midline (e.g. Pfannenstiel)
• Single injection or catheter
• Rescue analgesia
TAP blocks
Any surgery involves lower abdominal wall
bowel surgery
appendicectomy
caesarean section
hernia repair
umbilical surgery
gynaecological surgery
TAP block - Indications
Concern regarding blind technique
• Accuracy of placement of needle & LA
• Potential damage to adjacent structure
block failure
intravascular injection
injection into peritoneal cavity, with
associated risks of damage to bowel
and other abdominal viscera
TAP block - Complications
Liver puncture
Colonic puncture
TAP block - Complications
Methodshospital ethic committee
written informed consent
Enrolment: 60 adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery
Exclusion criteria: infection at the proposed site of injection, coagulation
disorders, allergy to bupivacaine, pregnancy, BMI > 35 & planned postoperative ICU care admission
Methods
All patients had standard monitoring & IV induction of GA
Before placement of block, the area was prepared with chlorhexidine
An initial US scan of the area was performed by an experienced anaesthetic
ultrasonographer
SonoSite 6 – 13 MHz linear probe (sterile sheath)
All TAP blocks were performed bilaterally by one of the six investigators
“Double pop” landmark technique(mid point of the iliac crest & the costal margin in
the mid-axillary line)
Blunt needle Plexufix 22g
(3 consultant anaesthetist & 3 anaesthetist in training)Each of whom had performed a minimum of 50
landmark based TAP block
Methods
After careful aspiration, 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25% was injected bilaterally
under real-time ultrasound imaging (out of plane technique)
To detect the position of needle & spread of LAs
Methods
The ultrasonographer recorded
Images of pre – and post – injection of LA
subcutaneous tissue, external oblique muscle, plane between the external and internal oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, TAP, transversus abdominis muscle, peritoneum
Methods
Anatomical site of injection
the anaesthetist performing the block was blinded to the ultrasound image
Post op pain scores were not assessed
Methods
If the needle was in the peritoneum, the anaesthetist performing the block was
alerted by the ultrasonographer and the procedure was repeated
Logistic regression analysis
• to explore the influence of patient age, sex,
BMI, presence of stoma, and the level of
experience of the anaesthetist performing
the block (consultant vs trainee) on the
likelihood of correct placement of the
needle tip and local anaesthetic and the
likelihood of peritoneal placement.
Statistical analysis
Mann-Whitney & Fisher’s exact test
• data analysis
Statistical analysis
Logistic regression analysis
• to determine both patient and operator
factors contributing to inaccurate needle
placement
Results
Study was terminated early due to unacceptable high level of peritoneal
needle placements
Results
17 (23.6%)
13 (18%)
Results 72 injections
32 40
15 VS 2 13
The only factor that predicted peritoneal injection was age after
adjusting for training (consultant or not).
(P = 0.04), (OR = 1.13), 95% confidence interval (1.01, 1.26)
Results
Patient BMI – no effect on successful or peritoneal placement of the needle tip. BMI and thickness of muscle layers or
peritoneal depth - no relationshipNo block-related complications were
noted.
Discussion
The placement of the needle tip and LA using the standard landmark-based approach to the TAP block is
inaccurate
The incidence of peritoneal placement
is unacceptably high
All trainees involved in the trial had performed > 50 blocks each
Discussion
33 % peritonal injection rate
Solution
Discussion
Cost price
RM 35 / set
Polymedic RM 38 / set
Stimuplex RM 28 / set• Courtesy from Mr Asnan
Cost price
RM 50 / set
Contiplex Tuohy RM 121 / set
Locoplex
RM 25 / ampRopi 0.75%RM 14.50 / ampChirocaine 0.5%RM 8.20 / vialMarcaine 0.5%
• Courtesy from Ching Ching, pharmacist Hospital Selayang 2010
DRUGS PRICE (RM)T. PCM 500mg 0.03 per tablet
Supp PCM 125mg 0.20 per suppSupp PCM 250mg 0.20 per supp
Syrup PCM 120mg/5ml (60ml) 1.77 per bottleAspirin 300mg solutablet 0.07 per tablet
Diclofenac injection 75mg/3ml 0.79 per vialDiclofenac acid gel 20g (Voren) 1.50 per tubeDiclofenac sodium 25mg supp 0.57 per supp
Diclofenac sodium 50mg tablet 0.03 per tabletMeloxicam 7.5mg tablet 0.11 per tabletIbuprofen 200mg tablet 0.03 per tablet
Ibuprofen syrup 100mg/5ml (60ml) 1.55 per bottleKetoprofen 2.5% gel 30g 4.40 per tubeKetoprofen 30mg plaster 0.60 per pieceNaproxen tablet 250mg 0.07 per tablet
Mefenamic acid 250mg capsule 0.04 per capsuleCelecoxib 200mg capsule 1.70 per capsuleEtoricoxib 120mg tablet 3.32 per tabletEtoricoxib 90mg tablet 1.87 per tabletTramadol 50mg capsule 0.07 per capsule
Tramadol HCL 50mg/ml injection 0.95 per vial
Cost price