SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 3 – Cash Holdings Prepared by Patricia R. Robertson...

SHORT-TERMFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Chapter 3 – Cash Holdings

Prepared by Patricia R. RobertsonKennesaw State University

2

CASH HOLDINGS

Chapter 3 Agenda

Identify the benefits and costs associated with corporate cash holdings, discuss motives for holding cash, assess corporate liquidity using financial ratios, and explain and use cash management models.

3

Cash Flow Timeline

The cash conversion period is the time between when cash is received versus paid.

The shorter the cash conversion period, the more efficient the firm’s working capital and more cash is generated.

The firm is a system of cash flows. These cash flows are unsynchronized and

uncertain.

4

Cash Holdings

The CCP is the length of time to convert cash disbursements into cash receipts.

It is useful in assessing firm liquidity during ordinary operations.

It is not a good indicator of a firm’s ability to withstand cash flow shocks from unexpected events (e.g.: losing a major customer, litigation, etc.).

This chapter focuses on the role of cash.

5

Cash Holdings

Cash is viewed as an idle corporate resource since it is a very low yielding asset.

It can include cash in bank accounts and low-risk, short-term marketable securities. The latter has transaction costs.

Firm’s establish a policy on it’s target cash position given: The current economic environment. Other liquidity sources. Upcoming obligations.

6

Liquidity Strategies

To determine the target cash position ($ or % of

assets): Low-Liquidity Strategy

Minimal cash level (higher risk; higher return). Appropriate for firms with predictable cash flows and

spare debt capacity. Moderate-Liquidity Strategy

More cash (less risk; less return). Strategy matches cash needs to upcoming

obligations. High-Liquidity Strategy

Large cash-to-asset ratio (low risk; low return). Appropriate for firms with high business risk.

7

Costs and Benefits of Holding Cash The cost of holding cash is the firm’s

opportunity cost. Managers hold cash for the following 3 reasons:

Transaction Cash is available to run the business without having to

liquidate investments and pay transaction costs. Precautionary

Cash is available for uncertainties and cash flow shortfalls.

Speculative Cash is available to capture unexpected opportunities

(e.g.: acquisitions).

8

Cash-Based Liquidity Measures Liquidity includes both flow and stock.

If cash from operations (flow) is insufficient to cover maturing obligations, the firm needs access to other resources (stock).

Financial measures to gauge firm liquidity from a cash perspective are: Cash Conversion Efficiency Cash Ratio Cash Burn Rate Net Liquid Balance (NLB) Current Liquidity Index Lambda

9

Cash Conversion Efficiency (CCE)

CCE measures the firm’s ability to convert revenues into operating cash flows.

The CCE should be positive indicating the firm is successfully converting revenues (sales) to cash flows.

10

Cash Ratio

The cash ratio is the proportion of total assets held on the balance sheet in cash.

11

Cash Burn Rate

The cash burn rate is the number of days a firm’s existing cash will last to cover ongoing expenses without any new cash inflows or external financing.

The denominator is dependent on the industry; a service firm might use operating expenses instead.

12

WCR & NLB (from Chapter 2)

NWC = WCR + NLB

Current Assets Minus Current Liabilities

Cash Accounts Payable

Marketable Securities Notes Payable

Accounts Receivable CMLTD

Inventory Accruals and Other

Prepaids and Other

Net Working Capital






Prepaids and Other






Prepaids and Other

Net Liquid Balance (NLB)

Working Capital Requirements (WCR)

13

Net Liquid Balance (NLB)

Net Working Capital = WCR + NLB

NLB = Financial CA – Financial CL It shows ability of stock resources to pay ‘arranged’

maturing debt which is unaffected by the operating cycle. A negative NLB indicates dependence on outside

financing. Continued sales growth and the permanent increase in

WCR should be financed with a permanent source of financing.

Seasonal sales growth results in temporary increases in WCR (A/R and Inventory), which can be financed by drawing down NLB.

14

Current Liquidity Index & Lambda

These two measures have a coverage component similar to the Current Ratio, but they also have a time (or flow) dimension as a result of including a measure of cash flow.

15

Current Liquidity Index (CLI)

CLI combines beginning cash & cash equivalents (‘stock’) plus expected OCF (‘flow’) in the numerator and liabilities due in the upcoming year (N/P and CMLTD) in the denominator.

It indicates if internal liquidity is sufficient to cover maturing obligations and/or if external financing will be required.

The variability of operating cash flow affects the target

cash level and the need for access to bank credit lines.

16

Lambda (λ)

Lambda accounts for the uncertainty of future cash inflows along with access to bank lines of credit. Lambda measures the probability of illiquidity. The numerator represents overall liquidity,

including cash, unused credit lines, and next period’s expected OCF.

The denominator is cash flow uncertainty, measured as the standard deviation of operating cash flow.

Lambda includes information about the volatility of expected cash flows. Historical data is used to calculate the denominator, using the standard deviation of the distribution of the firm’s expected net cash flow from operations.

17

λ And Related Probability Values

For example, a Lambda of 1.645 signals a 5% chance of running out of cash.

The approach is useful in differentiating liquidity risk for firms with identical cash levels.

18

How Much Liquidity Is Enough?

Using Lambda, and based on a firm’s unique circumstances, a firm need only maintain liquid reserves to meet unforeseen circumstances arising from a high degree of uncertainly regarding future cash flows.

If the future is stable, there is a lesser need for liquid resources.

19

Financial Flexibility

Financial Flexibility is related to a firm’s overall financial structure and if its financial policies allow it flexibility to take advantage of unforeseen opportunities.

A flexible short-term financial policy would maintain a high level of current assets relative to sales, such as:

Maintaining large cash balances.

Maintaining large inventory levels.

Offering liberal credit terms, leading to more sales and a higher receivable book.

20

Cash Management Models

Firm liquidity includes cash and near-cash investments (marketable securities).

Holding cash has an opportunity cost; converting securities to cash involves transaction costs.

Transaction costs include brokerage commissions, funds transfer fees, costs of communicating instructions and record keeping, etc.)

Firms want to maximize investment returns by minimizing idle cash while minimizing transactions costs.

Cash management (optimization) models help the firm determine the optimal number of liquidations per period (and the amount per liquidation) to minimize total costs.

21

Cash Management Models

We’ll look at three models, each which include different assumptions:

Baumol

Miller-Orr

Stone

22

Baumol Model

The goal of the Baumol model is to choose the Z* that results in the optimal trade-off between the cost of transferring funds out of securities (transaction costs) and foregone interest from holding cash (opportunity cost).

23

Baumol Model Illustrated

24

Baumol Model

The Baumol Model assumes: The firm has forecasted

cash needs over the planning period (total cash need - TCN).

Cash is replenished by liquidating investments.

The firm liquidates investments periodically, but must disburse funds at a continuous, steady rate.

The firm is able to forecast cash disbursements with certainty.

The model assumes net cash flow is negative.

When cash reaches zero (or a minimum “safety” amount),

cash is replenished in consistent increments by selling securities.THE “OPTIMAL RETURN POINT”

TO REPLENISH CASH IS DENOTED Z* IN THE MODEL.

Z

Z/2

25

The Total Cost of the cash position is given by the following formula:

Transaction Costs

+ Opportunity Cost

= Total Cost

Cost/Transaction х Number of TransactionsPeriod Interest Rate х Average Cash Balance

# Transacti

ons

Avg. Cash

Balance

Baumol Model

Where:Z* = Cash transfer amount (cash starting and return point)

F = Fixed transaction cost per sale of security

TCN = Total cash needed during planning period

i = Interest rate, per period (opportunity cost of holding cash)

26

There exists some Z* that minimizes the total costs. The first expression includes Z in the denominator;

with larger (but fewer) transactions, Transaction Costs are lower.

The second expression includes Z in the numerator; with larger (less frequent) transactions, Opportunity Cost is higher.

Baumol Model

Where:Z* = Cash transfer amount (cash starting and return point)F = Fixed transaction cost per sale of securityTCN = Total cash needed during planning periodi = Interest rate, per period (opportunity cost of holding cash)

27

The goal is to choose the Z* (the Optimal Return Point) that results in the optimal trade-off between Transaction and Opportunity Costs.

Z* is the amount of securities that should be sold to replenish cash when the disbursements account has been drawn down.

Take the derivative of the total cost equation and set equal to zero.

Baumol Model


28

Minimize Total Cost Function

02

1)( 2 iZTCNF

dZ

dTC

ZiZTCNFTCCash

2

1)( 1

iZTCNF2

1)( 2

)(2

12

TCNF

iZ

i

TCNFZ

)(22

29

Baumol Model Example

Using Baumol, determine Z* given:

Transaction costs (F) are $65/each.

Annual cash disbursements (TCN) are $1 million.

Target cash position is $0 (no safety cash).

Short-term securities (i) are paying 3%/yr.


30

Baumol Model Example

When investments are liquidated, it is done in $65,828 increments. If disbursements are

made at “a continuous and steady rate,” the average cash position is half of $65,828, or $32,914.

# of Annual Transactions (TCN/Z)

$1M / $65,828 = 15.19 X or about every 24 days

$65,828

$32,914

31

Miller-Orr Model

Like Baumol, Miller-Orr minimizes total costs (transaction and opportunity).

Baumol assumed net cash flows are steady and predictable; Miller-Orr assumes net cash flows are random and unpredictable. Miller-Orr allows for imperfections in daily cash balance

forecasts. The model includes two ‘trigger’ points:

Upper Control Limit (UCL) – Triggers a purchase to return cash balance to the “return point.”

Lower Control Limit (LCL) – Triggers a sale to return cash balance to the “return point”.

No transactions are made so long as the cash balance remains within the control limits (ranges).

32

Miller-Orr Model Illustrative

The model allows for an increase in the daily cash position, in addition to a decreases.

No action occurs so long as the daily cash balance remains within the range set by the control limits.

If the cash balance reaches the UCL, cash is invested to bring cash levels back to the Return Point (Z* + LCL). If the cash balance reaches the LCL, investments are sold to bring cash levels back to the Return Point.

UCL - Purchase

LCL - Sell

Return Point

33


UCL – If there is too much cash, securities are bought returning the cash balance to the Return Point (Z* + LCL).

LCL – If there is too little cash, securities are sold returning the cash balance to the Return Point.

So lon

g a

s t

he c

ash

bala

nce

rem

ain

s w

ith

in t

he r

an

ge,

no

acti

on

is t

aken

.

Return Point

34


Three values must be set:1) UCL2) LCL3) Return Point (Z* +

LCL)

Return Point

35

Miller-Orr Model Formula

36

Miller-Orr Model Example

A firm is considering cash variability in its planning based on the following assumptions:

Variance of daily cash flows = $1.0M LCL = $0 (could be > $0) Transaction Fee = $65/ea. Investment Rate = 3%

Calculate Z*:

37


When cash is outside of the control limits, the firm takes action to return the cash balance to the Return Point, investing only when cash reaches the UCL and liquidating investments at the LCL.

WE NOW HAVE TO ESTABLISH THE RETURN POINT, UCL AND LCL.

38


If the LCL is $0 and Z* is $8,402: Return Point

= Z* + LCL

= $8,402 + $0 = $8,402

UCL

= 3Z* + LCL= (3 x $8,402) + $0 = $25,206

Average Cash Balance

= (4/3)(Z*) + LCL

= (4/3)($8,402) + $0 = $11,203

$25,206

$0

$8,402Return Point

39


The firm starts with $8,402 in cash.

If UCL is reached, the firm invests $16,804.

If the LCL is reached, the firm sells $8,402 in investments.

In either case, the firm returns to the Return Point (Z* + LCL).

$25,206

$0

$8,402

INVEST$25,206 - $8,402 = $16,804

SELL

$8,402

Return Point

40


If the LCL is $5,000 and Z* is $8,402: Return Point

= Z* + LCL= $8,402 + $5,000 = $13,402

UCL

= 3Z* + LCL= (3 x $8,402) + $5,000 = $30,206

Average Cash Balance

= (4/3)(Z*) + LCL

= (4/3)($8,402) + $5,000 = $16,203

$30,206

$5,000

$13,402

Return Point

41


The firm starts with $13,402 in cash.

If UCL is reached, the firm STILL invests $16,804.

If the LCL is reached, the firm sells $8,402 in investments.

In either case, the firm returns to the Return Point (Z* + LCL).

$30,206

$5,000

$13,402

INVEST$30,206 - $13,402 = $16,804

SELL

$8,402

Return Point

42

Stone Model Example

A firm is planning its cash management activities using Stone; it begins with the rules for Miller-Orr: Assume LCL set at $50,000 (cash

buffer) Assume Z* is calculated at $25,000 Therefore, the control limits are:

LCL = $50,000 UCL = 3Z* + LCL

= (3 x $25,000) + $50,000 = $125,000 Return Point = Z* + LCL

= $25,000 + $50,000 = $75,000

$125,000

$50,000

$75,000

Return Point

43

Stone Model Example

A firm is planning its cash management activities using Stone; it begins with the rules for Miller-Orr: The firm starts with

$75,000 in cash. If UCL is reached, the firm

invests $50,000. If the LCL is reached, the

firm sells $25,000 in investments.

In either case, the firm returns to the Return Point.

$125,000

$50,000

$75,000

INVEST$125,000 - $75,000 = $50,000

SELL

$25,000

Return Point

44

Stone Model Example

Now, the Stone model attributes are added: The firm selects a ‘look-

ahead’ period between 3 and 12 days to project the cash balances; say 7 days.

It estimates daily, net cash flows for the look-ahead period. It assigns a forecasting

error for the cash flow estimates; say 3%.

Cash Flow Projections:

45

Stone Model Example

To account for the firm’s estimated forecasting error, the Miller-Orr control limits are adjusted by 3%, shrinking the range.

Modified Control Limits (3% Adjustment)

UCL ($125,000 x 97% = $121,250)

LCL ($50,000 x 103% = $51,500)

$125,000

$50,000

$75,000

Modified UCL $121,250

Modified LCL $51,500

Return Point

46

Stone Model Example

All Stone Model assumptions are assembled: Control Limits

UCL ($125,000)

Modified UCL ($121,250)

LCL ($50,000)

Modified LCL ($51,500)

Return Point ($75,000)

Look-Ahead Forecast (7 days) k (3 days) Cash Flow Projections

Forecasting Error (3%)


47

Stone Model Example

A chart is built for the length of the look-ahead period, including Day 0.

The daily, net cash flow projections are added.

With the beginning cash balance (say, $105,000), the estimated daily “Cash Balance” is calculated AND the estimated “Cash Balance in 3 Days” (k) is calculated, all for the 7 day look-ahead period.


48

Stone Model Example

Each day (for the entire look-ahead) period, the “Cash Balance” is compared to original control limits AND the “Cash Balance in 3 (k) Days” is compared to the modified control limits.

Decision-making is based on both.


49

Stone Model Example


Day 0 - The $105,000 Cash Balance is below the $125,000 UCL, so no further analysis is needed and no action is taken.

Control Limits UCL ($125,000); Mod. UCL

($121,250) LCL ($50,000); Mod. LCL

($51,500)

50

Stone Model Example

Day 1 - The $150,000 projected Cash Balance is more than the UCL and it remains that way for at least 3 days since, $160,000, the projected Cash Balance in 3 Days, is also more than the Modified UCL Plan to buy $85,000 in securities on Day 1 bringing cash to “return point” of $75,000 in 3 days.• $160,000 - $85,000 = $75,000


Control Limits UCL ($125,000); Mod. UCL

($121,250) LCL ($50,000); Mod. LCL

($51,500)

51

Stone Model Example

Note: If, on Day 1 the Cash Balance changes… since the ACTUAL Day 1 cash flows were different than projected...no action has to be taken. It is a planning tool and the decision rules are flexible.

Day 1 - The $150,000 projected Cash Balance is more than the UCL and it remains that way for at least 3 days since, $160,000, the projected Cash Balance in 3 Days, is also more than the Modified UCL Plan to buy $85,000 in securities on Day 1 bringing cash to “return point” of $75,000 in 3 days.• $160,000 - $85,000 = $75,000


52

Stone Model Illustrative

Return Point

53

Stone Model Options

A more complex version of Stone calls for the use of two look-ahead periods. For example, a firm could use both a 2-day

look-ahead and a 3-day look-ahead. Transfers between cash and securities only

take place if the cash position gets very high or low and is expected to stay that way for another 2 days (in the first analysis) and 3 days (in the second analysis).

54

Cash Trends

SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 3 – Cash Holdings Prepared by Patricia R. Robertson...

Documents

Transcript of SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 3 – Cash Holdings Prepared by Patricia R. Robertson...