Shock Source Description: Large-Scale Hybrid Simulations Dietmar Krauss-Varban Janet Luhmann Ilan...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Shock Source Description: Large-Scale Hybrid Simulations Dietmar Krauss-Varban Janet Luhmann Ilan...
Shock Source Description:Large-Scale Hybrid Simulations
Dietmar Krauss-VarbanJanet Luhmann
Ilan RothYan Li
Steve Ledvina
Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley
CISM All-Hands Meeting, Boston, 9/2004
Overview• Black-box Model and
Source Description• Observations• Theory and Transport
Models• Role of Simulations in
CISM SEP model
Reames, 1999
Hybrid Simulations
• Overview and Goals/Deliverables• Scales and Extrapolation• Early Results• Limitations and Outlook
Hybrid Simulations
Overview and Goals:
• Kinetic ions, electron fluid
• Spatial scale: c/p ; time scale p-1
• Initially focus on protons; later: arbitrary masses and charge states
Primary shock parameters: , MA, Bn
Secondary parameters: absolute n, absolute T
Hybrid Simulations
Scales and Extrapolation (conservative estimate):
Assume target energy of 1MeV.
Convected gyro radius in 6nT B-field 105 km ~ 103 c/p
Need several resonant in system in 1 direction
e.g., 10,000 x 500 c/p (assuming 2-D).
Typical time step 0.01 p-1, 2.5·106 pp/s / CPU
1 hour of real time (~transit time at MA = 5)
5 days on 40 CPUs
Power-law extrapolation
Hybrid Simulations
Limitations:
• Computational requirements/ infrastructure
• 3-D necessary for nearly-perpendicular case because of cross-field diffusion
Hybrid Simulations
Outlook/ Tentative Deliverables
3-D Parameter space:
• result grid ~O(100) points• Deliver: peak flux, power law index, and pitch-angle
distribution both upstream and downstream
Contributions from Test Particle Studies
• Generic results• Shock surfing/ nearly perpendicular shock• Power law extrapolation• Shock crossings: Transparency and further
energization• Understand trapped particle population at
quasi-perpendicular shock• Goals and deliverables
Test Particle Contribution
Generic Results: model shock with turbulence
Example: MA = 2, Bn = 85o, shock width = 0.1 c/p
Legend: (here: shock in x-z plane)
X position vs. time Y position vs. time
X vs. Y positions Vx velocity vs. time
Vx vs. Vy velocities Z vs. y positions
Z velocity vs. time energy vs. time
Test Particle Contribution
Shock-interaction of ions:
- accelerated at another shock,
- or mirrored, e.g. ,in converging fields behind (sunward of) shock
“transparency”
MA = 3.0, Bn = 80o
Turbulent medium: sigma= 0.1, M=3, theta=80, W= 225keV
Turbulent shock –> significant effect on medium energy ions
Test Particle Contribution
• In presence of turbulence, as expected, ions can be further energized during second encounter
• Depending on level of turbulence and spectrum, very energetic particles may not be significantly affected by shock
• Transmission is strongly pitch-angle dependent
Yan Li will study observationally trapping/ pitch-angle distributions of energized ions at q-perp shocks
Energetic Storm Particle (ESP) Events
• Overview/ Relevance to CISM
• Hybrid Simulations of Spatio-Temporal Evolution
• Integration into CISM SEP Model:
- empirical model
- integration of simulation results
Energetic Storm Particle (ESP) Events
• Integration into CISM SEP Model:
- empirical model
- integration of simulation results
• Yan observational study:
- when/why high energies
- distinguish bulk vs. spike