Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, Decommissioning ...avan v.a letli. contour Inihral 100 feet....

SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORPORATION "Decommissioning Plan for the Newfield Facility"

August 28, 2002

Rev. 0, 28

19 APPENDICES

ST"C

SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORPORATION "Decommissioning Plan for the Newfield Facility"

August 28, 2002

Rev. 0, Page 129

Appendix 19.1 - Chapter 3 Reference Materials

"TRC

COASTAL PLAIN STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY INFORMATION

Excerpted From:

New Jersey Geological Survey Geologic Report Series No. 4.

"Generalized Structural Contour Maps of The New Jersey Coastal Plain"

Horace Richards Filt Olmsted James Ruhle

- •7 EXPLANATION

oy 0 -ilia

Approximate altitude of eismlc data

0 -830

Altitude of well data

Values rounded to nearest S feet.

Generalized structure contour on preCretaceous bedrock surface. Altutude In feet: datum Is mean sea level, contour Interval 500 feet.

Edge of Ledrock outcrop.

10 0 I0 20 U-.40

I0

II III E~snc. Ai,,Ilard. and Vint 119191

4-1) ------- 11"401 (3) Mlarine. and Itasmu-,n 4191S),

()Itas•mu-srn. Slnuv~hter. Hulmt. and Mutrphy I1S$1)

I W) V,'oMlld 11911)

/ I

I I

0-11

76'0.50 jshafd)FIGURE 2.-MAP SHOWING GENERALIZED CON.

FIGURATION OF PRE-CRETACEOUS BEDROCK SURFACE IN NEW JERSEY AND DELAWARE

13

Oo .. woo 00

Cc Cb

oooeý

IAJ

0

7l*00o tO' V.e".

30~ 74*00' I -. 40*30

Boy ,.-- 5-% .-. I0,.0

"j .,..J 0 - o•5

0--245(10

"C,-... • , . -- 0--90 7 i

~ 7 V "~~ A95 -660 .- '~(O)' - -- 62050)

- "4000

PHILADELPH A 0140

M'. o5 -'o7

-,. "- -P

0-600

3, - . - Atlanhic C

• Dovl X • EXPLANATI 0N

t*5 0-7 04 16 -, ss

SDELAWARE DAY oii .tis 0•oo.

Dnl a og Well rimpl.El-ri o 005 r Well dmL2r

It •'•.. •Vertlcal number. lndlicate altitude of top ,of furmatlo-t S•'f .•,In flirt: datum aincs ean i,t lesel: numbers. La palren. -. th'lese In~dicae thlicklnesl of form~ation. In feleL Vallus Wl in nun.ltd to n'Arest fet 20" 0-. . . . . "1000 "

I C.. ni raliztd structure contour on top of th~e 3tarahall.

-A h 0l. cot1 ne~a 0 •t

* nwn E,.rmsti..n. Altitui in f'eet datum is meanl

Nl

i ~Outcrup of Mlarshalttown formation

SJo plars, concealed by Ijuaternary deposits. 0 tO 0 .0 It

'a 30 "441 Inict thcnesoffrm to....et V l

76, cc -'o' . . .. ,,,oo' 3" ,,,-=' FIGURE 6.--MAP OF MARSHALLTOWN FORMATION SHOWWRG

ITS EXTENT AND SUBSURFACE CONFIGURATION IN NEW JERSEY

21

-74,00

-40,*30'

r 0

4\-.. / L _"i -0 - gl_ -- , I 2OOi .o

PA. Wiming/n iI -c.i*i95 i

11828 Ts ~~20 / s / .- 1

PHILAD EXPLANATION

Laur •l -a.do., , f dal

bet0 a0.1i•d /t ,m ine t p contour int er•,alfe•e t

020 '00I 0..oo

FIGR ".MA OF ENA FORMATIO AN MOUN LARESN

1 1

lO 0 -1 0 io'--I 1 1ri ,4er' Zo "Wel ,xp~ Tl.1r01 l

232

1ITS1\ (100 -)

0t 0-el' dill i~~~~~~~~~~~~5 ý etclnmesIdcteltt- ltpn on

I'IN

€ontuu .n7rolt0 fee l l

t4I LVW lx / ,

W i ngo t 00 .- ,• Idll

D. ... . . . . z0

)i1W ,o' 6000 zso' FIGURE 0).MA O"0NNHIORAINADMUN ARLSN

SHOWING-5 THE0) .XEN AN SUSUFAE OFIURTINSI NW ERE

236

30*

75 * 00W

rA 801

'K, . 400

- I- o 20

I'.~ 030)

J .90%

5 40,00,

'"s .0

ý IL V A Wl4 -1 9

10,11 / -43 *-670

(Z () (60, oo/, ~ ,

Z. 2 s 01117 /,1 00

,(BS) -30

/ - Il

Ciy-1435

"7,

-46S0 -8 0 -7

(10 175) (21s) DEL AWA RE B A DrlIler~a lIng Well samples Electric togf

Well data Vrtical fmb-rs Indicate altitude of top of formration. "'o In frt cdatum I. mrnsalvl ubr nmcn th.aindicatv thicknes f omain Infect. Values rounded to nearest S fret.

-- - - -- 1500

Gene~ralized structurec Contnur on top of the Vinrsen. tn-nFnrmti-nAlitude in Gett: datum Is mean

Outcriop of Vinernif-rn forgnation In Places. C--ne-aIlui by Quaterniry deposit,,

gotoI 20 W.16%

30' 30' 73*0o 310 -74

FIGURE 11.-MAP OF VINCENTOWN FORMATION SHOWING ITS EXTENT AND SUBSURFACE CONFIGURATION IN NEW JERSEY

29

73,00. 30'

30s

"f1renion

S(601

- .-

'1

V

D I * c

8

EXrLANATION ..•"Pf (P -27s

•(ll)'l'•I0||7) 421S)

Driller's olo Weit sa•ples ]Electric lor

Well data

Vertical numbers Indicate altitude or top of Shark River marl. or Manasquan formation where the Shark River Is absent. In feet: datum is mvan s~a level; numbers In parentheses Indteale thickness #,f com. bin.d unat. in fe-t. Values rounded to nearest S feet.

-1000

Cen-ralized structure contour non top of the Shark River marl or where It is ab'sent on totp of the Mtanasquan Formation. Altitude In fret: Iatum Is avan v.a letli. contour Inihral 100 feet.

0.04• -IL. 4) eteioti of MtnnftA)uan formhtcsin and SharL .. rer

M.arl.

In idata-.. rohnLcald hy t)Oiatrrniry iL posits.

10 0 10 20 ,ls

FIGURE 12.-MAP OF MANASQUAN FORMATION AND SHARK RIVER MARL SHOWING THEIR EXTENT AtiD SUBSURFACE CONFIGURATIONS IN NEW JERSEY

303

ofr

I

OPENNSYLVAIAiNW JERSEY Clto fTnOj

Q• ...... ,..U....on.... MSL . -xQ, .MSL rrinc , aquifers

I - ••"•+-'• ,;•:" 1U,1i primarily

-201..VERTICAL EXAGGERATION 52 8 X 0n aquiciude

LES .. .. . °.

bo~~t t~ w HAM?,' *''.. ~*. (,s.",,g weg of New Jersey (1950)

Figure 2.-Generalized geologic mops and cross-section of Gloucester County, N. J.

SR 30

Gloucester County Special Report No. 30

c D M - r -

"Geologic Map of Newark 1 x 20 Quadrangle,

New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York"

U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series 1-1715

"Generalized Geological Cross Section"

Figure 2 From:

"Water Resources and Geology of Gloucester County; New Jersey

Special Report 30, NJDCED

William Hardt George Hultin

1969

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR

FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE

RECORD TITLED:

"GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE NEWARK 1r x 2? QUADRANGLE, NEW JERSEY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND NEW YORK",

SHEET 1 OF 2

WITHIN THIS PACKAGE

NOTE: Because of these page's large file size, it may be more convenient to copy the file to a local drive and use the Imaging (Wang) viewer, which can be accessed from the Programs/Accessories menu.

D-01

a- -

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR

FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE

RECORD TITLED: "GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE NEWARK 10 x 2? QUADRANGLE, NEW JERSEY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND NEW YORK",

SHEET 2 OF 2

WITHIN THIS PACKAGE

NOTE: Because of these page's large file size, it may be more convenient to copy the file to a local drive and use the Imaging (Wang) viewer, which can be accessed from the Programs/Accessories menu.

D-02

Earthquake Information

Excerpted-From

"Catal6g-ofNew Jersey Earthquakes throught1990"

New Jersey Geological Survey Report-30

Daniel Dombrowski, 1991-

HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES IN NEW JERSEY AND SURROUNDING AREAS

Date Time Latitude/ Location Magnitude Maximum Area Depth Longitude Intensity felt (km)

(0,/0,) (sq. mi.)

12/18/1737 23:00 40 48/ Near NY City VII 7400

11/29/1783 22:50 4100/ WofNY City VI 7430 1

09/02/1847 Felt from RI to Philadelphia, PA V 09/29/1847 40 30/ 74 00 Near NY City - Felt V

from RI to Philadelphia, PA 09/09/1848 22.00 Near NY City - Felt from RI to V

Philadelphia, PA 10/09/1871 09:40 39 42/ Wilmington, DE VII

7530 07/11/1872 05:25 40 54/ New Rochelle, NY V 100

1 7348 12/10/1874 22:25 4054/ Westchester VI 5,000

73 48 County, NY 09/10/1877 09:59 4006/ Near Burlington, V 300

7454 NJ 03/25/1879 19:30 39 12/ Delaware River V 600

7530 08/10/1884 14:07 40 36/ Near NY City 5.0 VII 70,00

7400 0 03/09/1893 12:30 40 36/ NY City V

7400 09/01/1895 06:09 4042/ Near High Bridge, VI 35,00

7448 NJ 0 04/23/1910 NJ Coast IV 2,000 01/26/1921 18:40 4000/ Near Riverton, NJ V 150

7500 06/01/1927 07:20 40 18/ NJ Coast VII 3,000

7400 01/24/1933 21:00 40 12/ Near Trenton, NJ V 600

7442 08/22/1938 22:36 40 06/ Central NJ V 5,000

7430 11/14/1939 21:54 3936/ Salem County, NJ V 6,000

75 12 1943 p.m. 41 06/ Mahwah, NJ & V 5

74 12 Suffern, NY 09/04/1944 23:39 44 54/ Massena, NY 5.9 VIII 175,0

7448 00 09/03/1951 20:26 4112/ Rockland County, 4.4 V 5,500

7406 NY 08/16/1953 23:22 40 18/ Bergen County, NJ IV

7400 03/31/1954 16:25 40 18/ Monmouth County IV

74 00 shoreline, NJ 03/23/1957 14:03 4048/ West-central NJ VI

\j

S7400 -_ _ _ _

12/27/1961 12:06 40 12/ PA-NJ border V . 150 7448 __-_-__

12/10/1968 04:13 4006/ Near Riverton, NJ 2.9 V 7500 "_ _

10/06/1969 41 00/ Lake Hopatcong, 1.3 IV 13 - -•"" 7436 NJ ____- ____

02/28/1973 03:21 3943/ Northern Salem" 3.8 VI 3,000 75 26 County, NJ ..... ______

04/28/1974 10:19 39 42/ Wilmington, DE 2.5 IV 5 7542

06109/1974 16:45 Atlantic City to V 100 Wildwood, NJ

06/17/1974 14:30 Atlantic City to IV 50 Wildwood, NJ

03/11/1976 16:07 4101/ Riverdale, NJ 2.8 V 100 7423

04/13/1976 10:39 4048/ Ridgefield, NJ 3.1 V 250 3.1 7402

02/10/1977 14:14 39 46/ Wilmington, DE 2.0 V 3 7532

03/10/1977 11:22 4111/ Suffern, NY 2.2 IV 100 6 7409

06/30/1978 15:13 41 05/ Mahwah-Oakland, 2.9 V 100 5 7412 NJ

01/30/1979 11:30 4019/ Cheesequake, NJ 3.5 V 3,600 5 7416 _

02/23/1979 05:23 4048/ Chester, NJ IV 13 7449

03/09/1979 23:49 4043/ Bernardsville, NJ 3.1 V 250 3 7430

03/05/1980 12:06 40 10/ Abington, PA 3.5 IV 300 7.9 7504

03/11/1980 01:00 40 09/ Abington, PA 3.7 V 600 5 7505

0810211980 12:21 4026/ Keyport, NJ 3.1 7.6 7409

08/30/1980 04:19 39 501 Medford, NJ 3.0 2.2 7452

10/21/1981 11:49 41 08/ Long Island Sound, 3.5 V 6,500 6.4 7234 NY

04/12/1982 17:14 40 03/ Near Mount Holly, 2.4 V 7.4 7448 NJ

02/19/1983 00:45 40 38/ Oldwick, NJ 2.7 IV 6.1 7446

10/07/1983 05:18 43 56/ Blue Mountain 5.3 VI 200,0 13 74 15 Lake area, NY 00

11/17/1983 14:55 3944/ Wilmington, DE 2.2 V 4.8 7535

01/19/1984 18:03 39 43/ Wilmington, DE 2.4 IV 50 4.0 7532

04/22/1984 20:36 39 55/ Near Lancaster, PA 4.4 VI 22,00 5 7621 0

10/19/1985 05:07 4059/ Ardsley, NY 4.0 VI 12,00 6 7350 0

102119851053714059/ Ardsley, NY V 2,000 7350 _I I 3"

Source: "Catalog of New Jersey Earthquakes Through 1990," Geological Survey Report 3 1: New Jersey Geological Survey NOTES: * Figure 1. (Map showing earthquake epicenters in and near New Jersey) illustrates approximate locations. The above table is a partially listing of all earthquakes in within approximately 200 miles of the Shieldalloy Metalurgical Corporation Site location in Newfield, New Jersey. It includes all earthquakes that have a magnitude of 3.0 and greater or a Modified Mercalli intensity of IV and above.

II

o• NY o o 8~oI

0000 0

0 00

o 00

PA0

0 00

00

EXPLANATION 0 Epicenter of earthquakeDE recorded or felt

in New Jersey •0 Epicenter of nearby

earthquakenot felt in New Jersey

75OW 74OW

Figure 1. Map showing earthquake epicenters in and near New Jersey.3

"*-.LOC.G ot0 OF-st'

ATTACHMENTS

SECTION 4.7

"Flood Insurance Rate Map and Street Index Borough of Newlield, New Jersey

.. -Fenna, 1982

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMM

FIRMC 7 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP

CITY OF

VINELAND, NEW JERSEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY

PANEL 5 OF 35 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED)

COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 340176 0005 B

"4.1 EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 5, 1982

Federal Emergency Management AgencyI

z, ,

__7I

J

ZONE X

ZONE C

ZONE X

ZONE X

ZONE C

LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR

FLOOD Zone A - No Base Flood Elevations Determined

IZ] OTHER AREAS Zone X - Areas Determined to be Outside 500-year Flood Plain

0 800

SCALE FEET

FROM:

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP & STREET INDEX, BOROUGH OF NEWFIELD, NJ. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, 340549 0001 B, 6117/91 AND CITY OF VINELAND, NEW JERSEY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY. 340176 0005 B 715182

TRC Environmental Corporvgon

5 Waterside Crossing Wndsor, CT 06095 (203) 289-8631

SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORPORATION NEWFIELD. NEW JERSEY

FIGURE 2-2.

DELINEATED FLOOD HAZARD AREAS NEAR SMC FACILITY

I

C'I

•\% ZONE X

ZONE XI

CORPOR'ATE ''LIMITS "" ••..

C

ýAl

ZONE C

11

ZONE C

ZONE C

(

C

NN

C

_J

1) Aquifer Testing and Aquifer Test Analysis'Summary 2) Monitoring Well Information 3) -Analytical Results, Radiological Parameters

From:

"ý'Summary of Geohydrologic Information Collected Since January 1988"

Dan Raviv Associates, Inc., 4/1990

3.0 AQUIFER TESTING AND WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

Aquifer testing was performed in August 1988 in conjunction with well development after installation of the three new recovery wells (RW6S, RW6D, and RIW2). Aquifer testing was also performed using all five of the recovery wells (the Layne Well and Wells W9, RW6S, RW6D, and RIW2) in July and August 1989, in conjunction with the initial testing of the new remediation system (Table II). Although extensive testing had previously been conducted at the site (DRAI, 10/84 and 1/88), additional testing of the shallow portion of the Cohansey Sand and of the interaction of the shallow and deep portions of the aquifer was advisable.

In addition, an extensive round of water level measurements was obtained in conjunction with the October 1989 ground water sampling. Using these measurements and the new well survey, a ground water elevation contour map was constructed for comparison with previous contour maps.

3.1 Aquifer Testing (August 1988) Both variable'and constant rate'tests were conducted on the new recovery wells (RW6S, RW6D, and RIW2) in August 1988 to ensure thtat the wells were properly installed and to verify that the aquifer conditions off-site were not significantly different than on-site. The variable-rate tests (or step tests) were performed by pumping each well at a given rate until the water level stabilized in the recovery well, at which time the pumping rate was increased. Each test included at least four pumping rates. The constant-rate tests were performed by pumping each well and obtaining water level measurements in the closest observation well.

Graphs of water levels versus time during the step tests of Wells RW6S, RW6D, and RIW2 are included in Appendix C on Figure's Cl,° C4, and Cll, respectively. The step test data were usedfor a qualitative assessment of well efficiency. Quantitative analyses of'well efficiency (e.g. calculating the well loss constant) can also be performed. However, the Cohansey Sand is very productive in this, area and each of the three wells sustained a pumping rate on the'order of 200 gallons per minute (gpm), which is twice the necessary rate for effective remediation from each of these wells (i.e. 100 gpm). Therefore, the quantitative analysis of the step test data was not considered necessary at this time.

Even though the recovery wells can be pumped at higher rates, increased pumping reduces the effectiveness of the remediation system because clean water is pumped with contaminated water. However, one of the goals of the remediation system design was flexibility. The step test results indicate that, if necessary, the pumping rates in the recovery wells can be balanced. For example, if the Cr+6 concentrations in Well W9 decrease rapidly, it is possible to pump more from another, more contaminated well, such as RW6S, while reducing the pumping rate from Well W9. (The initial pumping rates selected for the new system are: Well RIW2 - 100 gpm; Well RW6S - 100 gpm; Well RW6D - 100 gpm; the Layne Well - 50 gpm; and Well W9 50 gpm. The basis for selection of these rates is discussed in greater detail in DRAI's January 1988 report and the NJDEP letter of December 9, 1987.)

- 6 - Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

During the constant-rate tests, water level measurements were obtained from a close observation well, rather than from the recovery well. The data from the observation wells were analyzed to deteruine' aquifer

transmissivity (T), storage coefficient (S or specific yield, S, in unconfined conditions) and vertical hydraulic conductivity (p'), using a variety of methods.-- These calculated aquifer characteristics are summarized on Table III.

The graphs of water level drawdown(s) versus -time (t) since pumping started and residual drawdown(s') versus the ratio of time since pumpingstarted 'to time since it stopped (t/t'), which were used, for the 'analyses, as-well as the analytical equations and the calculations, are included on the figures in Appendix C (Figures C2 and C3'for Well RW6S, Figures C5 through Cl0 for Well RW6D, and Figures C12 through C17 for Well RIW2). It should'be noted that some of theapplied analyses are for- confined aquifers. However, these analyses are routinely 'applied to unconfined or semi-confined aquifers where the horizontal gradients are -significantly larger than the vertical gradients and because of the practical difficulties of complete analysis of an unconfined flow system (Freeze and Cherry, 1979).

From the drawdown and recovery data obtained from Well SC6S during pumping of Well -RW6S, "transmissivity values of 575,500 and 230,200 gallons per day per foot (gpd/ft), respectively were calculated using the "straight-line" or "Jacob" method developed by Cooper 'and Jacob (Driscoll,* 1986). The magnitude of these values are indicative of the very productive nature of the Cohansey Sand in this region. The data from Well SC6S were not suitable for other analyses due to the high transmissivity and proximity (5 feet) to the pumping well which resulted in rapid equilibrium-of the water levels (i.e. no change in drawdown over time after the first few minutes of pumping).

The drawdown data from Well SC6D during pumping of Well RW6D were analyzed by the "Hantush" (or "Walton") method (Kruseman and DeRidder, 1970) of

type-curve matching,- as well as by the Jacob method. The transmissivities calculated from the drawdown data- from this well ,ranged:from 26,,200 to-96,000 _gpd/ft, -and -the calculated storage coefficient rangedfrom 8Oxl0-4 to 5.6x0-2;- :As ýdiscussed in'Section 3.3, the lower 'transmissivity yalues were -expected in the deeper.portion of the Cohansey-Sand. The leakage factors (r/B) from the type curves which most closely match the data were 0.075 and 0.05, which yield vertical hydraulic conductivities of 114 and 235 gallons per day-per-square foot -(gpd/ft2), assuming the thickness of

the overlying clay/sand leaky confining layer is 40 'feet.' These' vertical conductivities'are-higher'than expected and may be a function~of theproximity of the'two wells (10 feet)...

The drawdown-,data-'from Wells IW2 and SC3S during pumping of Well-RIW2 were analyzed by'the-"Boulton" and "Theis" methods of type-curve matching, (Kruseman and'DeRidder,'1970),' as well:as by-the Jacob method.,-The , "Boulton",method-was developed'specifically.:for the delayed water-table response often observed soon after pumping -begins in unconfined aquifer testing, and the data from Well "IW2,appeared characteristic of the delayed

7 - Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. -. Job No. 83C152

response. Not unexpectedly, the data from Well SC3S, which is farther from Well RIW2, did not show the delayed response. The calculated transmissivities from these two tests range from 103,000 to 144,100 gpd/ft, as expected in the shallowaquifer. The calculated storage coefficients range from 2.lxlO-4 to 1.2xI0-3; somewhat lower than are'typical for unconfined aquifers. The Boulton delay index, which is dependent on the testing parameters such as distance from the pumped well as well as the aquifer parameters, was 1.0 for Well IW2.

3.2 Aquifer Testing (July-August 1989) Constant-rate tests were .performed in July-August 1989 using the Layne/W9 well pair, the RW6S/RW6D well pair, and Well RIW2. -At,-each location, water level drawdown and recovery were measured in both the pumped well(s) and the surrounding observation wells. The purpose of the-testing was to refine available measurements of the characteristics of both the shallow and deep portions of the Cohansey Sand aquifer and to refine measurements of the vertical hydraulic conductivity between the two~portions.

The pumping schedule is summarized on Table II and was determined in part by the performance of the remediation system because it was being tested simultaneously. Several of the pumping/recovery segments were of short duration and were not considered useful for quantitative analysis of the aquifer characteristics. However, a long enough constant-rate test was, performed at each of the three recovery centers for quantitative analysis.

For qualitative analysis, linear graphs of water levels versus time are-, included on Figures 2 through 7. Graphs of drawdown versus t and residual, drawdown versus t/t', which-were used for the quantitative analyses, as well as the analytical equations and calculations are included in Appendix D. The quantitative results are summarized on Table III, and both the qualitative and quantitative results are discussed below by testing date.

July 26, 1989. Well W9 (deep).was pumped intermittently at 50 gpm. There are essentially three different segments in this test, because the well was shut off twice, once after 47-minutes of pumping and their after 18 minutes of recovery and another 27 minutes of pumping. Between-the pumping segments, the well was allowed to recover to within about 90% of the static water level before the-pump' was restarted.

Water levels were' also measured in a few of the closest observation wells. The data from Well? C, B, and'SC9S are plotted on Figure 2, along with the data from Well W9. The-observation well measurements illustrate the degree. of interconnection between the shallow and deep aquifers. Well C is completed between the shallow and deep portions of the aquifer and Wells B and SC9S are both shallow-wells. The water levels in all three fluctuated in response to the pumping of Well W9, although the magnitude of the fluctuations are on-the order of less than 0.1 foot and there appears to be, a time lag in the responses,; as would be' expected.,o-(In contrast, drawdown in a nearby deep moniitoringýwell would be on the order of feet, rather than less than 0.1 feet, as evident in Well A on July 27, 1989).


-1

The joint response of the two aquifers, such as during the pumping of Well W9 is advantageous in p'mping for remediation because of'the additional drawdown. -• However, the magnitude of the response is not sufficient to allow for pumping'from only the shallow or the deep portion of the Cohansey Sand inareas whereboth portions are contaminated. Also, care must betaken to avoid cross--contamination by pumping from an uncontaamiinated portion of the aquifer, e.g. pumpinig 'of the deep portion near-the' t 6 e of the plume is not advisable because it is'n6t yet contaminated in thiat area although the shallow portion is.

Data from the three-pumping segments and-two drawdown segments *ere used to calculate transmissivity (Figures' Dl through D5) using the Jacob method. The calculated valuei range from'10,400 to'33,000, which'are typical of the deeper'portion of the Cohansey Sand in whichi Well W9 is completed.

July 27.' 1989. The'Layne Well was pumped at 50 gpm for 150 minutes and then'both the'LaYneýWell and Well W9 were pumped s'imultaneously at 50 gpm each (100 gpm total) for about another 200 minutes." Water levels were measured in: the pumped wells; in several shallow ob'servation wells (Wells B, E, I, K, and SC9S); in the one, close, deep well (Well A)-;" and in Well C, which is completed between the upper and lower portions of the Cohansey Sand. ' 1

The data from'the latter portion of'the test, with-bothwells'pumping, were not analyzed quantitatively due t6 'the simultaneous pumping.' For similar reasons, recovery'wis not measured after this test. However, the'increase in the drawdown when the deep Well W9 is also turned on is apparent on the graphs of the water levels versus time on Figure 3.

The data from'the portion of the test 'during which only the'Layne'Well was pumping were analyzed for transmissivity,- storage coefficient and veiiical hydraulic conductivity, as summa'riied on Table III and'detailed in Appendix' D. The analytical methods included HantushT and Jacob plus the "distance-drawdown" method, which is related to the Jacob method.- The calculated transmissivity'vaiues range from 24,900 to 440,000,"and the storage coefficients range from 5.2x10-6 to 2.4xi0-2.

For this test, .the transmissivities calculated from' the Hantush method (and' the distance-drawdown method)' are 'less *than 'those from the Jacob' method. This is appar6ntly a function of the assumptions used in both'meth6ds, in particular the-influenice of vertical flowI components, due'to vertical' anisotropy within the shallow portion of the aquifer and/or the anisotropy between the shallow and deep portions of the aquifer.

The upper portion of the Cohansey Sand'does- contain thin'clay "stringers" and layeri'(dn the order -f 'a few inches thick), and not all- the wells'are completed at-the'same depth. Therefore, thre'6bservehd -influince' could be due to0-"leakage" within-the shallow portion of thehaquifer or upward leakage from the deep portion.

9 - Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

It was assumed that the Hantush method was applicable, although the phenomenon could be-an indication of delayed yield. Even so, use of the Hantush analysis results in a "worst case" calculation in that the lower. the transmissivity,, the higher the required pumping rate(s). The leakage factors from the Hantush analysis range from 0.2 to 1.0. The vertical hydraulic conductivities, which were calculated using the difference in the screened well depths, range from 2 to 99 gpd/ft2.

Well RW6S was also pumped at 100 gpm, later in the day on July 27, 1989, and water level measurements were obtained during pumping from Wells SC6S/6D and SClOS/lOD. Well SC6D was of particular interest for vertical hydraulic conductivities and Wells SCIOS/10D were of particular interest for evaluating the influence of Hudson Branch. Recovery was not measured.

Graphs of the water levels versus time are shown on Figure 4. Similar to, aquifer conditions in theI southwest corner of the plant (the Layne Well and: Well W9), both the Shallow and deep wells responded to pumping of the shallow well. Also, the wells on the opposite side of the stream (SCIOS/10D) responded to pumping of Well RW6S.

The data from this test was analyzed for transmissivity, storage coefficient and vertical hydraulic conductivity using the Hantush and Jacob methods. The calculated transmissivities range from-39,500 to 713,500 gpd/ft, and the storage coefficients range form 1.7x10-6 to 4.5xi0-i. The calculated values from Well SC6D and Well SCIOS are of interest for two distinct reasons.

As in the analyses of the 1988 testing of Well RW6D, a high vertical hydraulic conductivity was calculated from the Well SC6D data. (In fact, the 1989 value is extremely high, 11,000 gpd/ft2.). Also,• the storage coefficient calculated from the Well SC6D data is very high, on the order of 4.OxlO-l. These calculated values are considered suspect due to the proximity (10 feet) of Well SC6D and the pumping well RW6S and the potential for increased vertical leakage due to well interference.

Analysis of the data from Well SClOS, which was only suitable for the Jacob analysis, resulted in an extremely high calculated transmissivity of 713,500 gpd/ft (and an unusually low storage coefficient, 1.7x10-6). The high transmissivity could result from the influence of another water source, as would be expected from ground/surface water exchange along Hudson Branch.

If the results from Wells SC6D and SCIOS are omitted, the calculated transmissivities (shallow 7 203,100 to 330,000; deep,- 39,500) and storage coefficients (deep -- 8.8xI0-4) from this test are considered representative of "average" aquifer conditions (Table III). The leakage factor from the Well SC1OD data was 1.5, which results in a vertical hydraulic conductivity of 38 gpd/ft2.


July 28, 1989. Wells RW6S and RW6D were pumped simultaneously at 100 gpm

each (200 gpm total). Although the water level measurements in the

observation wells were not used fort quantitative analysis due'to the

simultaneous pumping, graphs of the'water levels versus time are shown on Figure 5. Again, the mutual response of the shallow and deep portions of'

the aquifer are apparent.

July 31, 1989,. Wells RW6S and RW6D were pumped at 100 gpm each (200 gpm

total). This was the first day that water level measurements could be obtained from the Galena wells. As shown on Figure 6, there is a definite response in the closer Galena wells to pumping of the' RW6S/6D well pair. This is of particular importance to-the VOC remediation because Galena is considered to be one of the VOC sources. Also, Cr+6 concentrations slightly inexcess of 0.05 ppm have been-detected during one sampling round of the'Galena'wells.' Therefore, influence of the Galena wells is considered advantageous to complete remediation.

August 3._1989. Well RIW2 was pumped at 100 gpm,'and water levels were measured-in: the pumped well; several shallow observation wells (IWl, IW2, SClS',-and SC3S);.several deep observation wells (SUID, SC3D, SC5D), and an irrigation well completed in both portions of the aquifer (IW4). Drawdowns versus time in those wells which responded are shown on Figure 7. Recovery was not measured. 'Due to the low pumping rate'relative~to the capacity of the aquifer and the relatively short duration of the test (less than 3

hours), apparent responses in Wells SCID, SC3D, SC5D, and IW4 are questionable.- The'drawdown data from the-other wells were analyzed using the Boulton, Hantush, Jacob, and distance-drawdown methods.

From the shallow well data (RIW2, IWland IW2), the calculated transmissivities range from 101,500-to'264,000 gpd/ft) and the storage coefficients range from 2.8xi0-4 to 2.5xi0-3. The delayed yield indices for Wells IWlVand IW2 weref0.6 and'0.4- respectively. Of interest is the apparently-"noimal" response of Well IWl'which, like Well'SCIOS, is located on the opposite&side of-Hudson Branch from the pumping well. 'However, stream sampling'data (Section.4;2) has iiidicated-that this portion of the stream is a '"gaining" stream,, i.e. ground water contributes-to-the~stream flow. -Tlierefore,:influence of the striam would probably not be -evident until very large drawdowns-were created underneath the stream.-'

From the deep well data (SC2D), the calculated transmissivity range from 95,500'to'203,100gpd/ft and-the storage coefficients range from 3.3xl0=4 to 8.9x10-3. The leakage factor is 0.4, which reiuilts' in a vertical hydraulic conductivity of 12 gpd/ft2, assuming the thickness of the clay/sand layer'iS,-40 feet.


3.3 Comparison of Previous and Recent Aquifer Testing Results The average aquifer characteristics reported in January 1988, which were based on four aquifer tests conducted for SMC and two tests conducted for the Borough of Newfield, were:

Portion of Transmissivity Storage Coefficient Vertical Hydraulic Aquifer (gpd/ft) (dimensionless) Conductivity (gpd/ft2)

Overall 130,000 3.OxlO-2 0.06 - 3.0 Deep 74,000 2.OxiO-3

No "shallow" characteristics were reported because none of the tests were conducted using wells completed only in the shallow portion of the Cohansey Sand. For the simulation of the ground water remediation system, described in the January 1988 report, a slightly higher transmissivity of 146,000 gpd/ft was used, and the vertical hydraulic conductivity, was assumed to range from 1/10 to.l/2 of the horizontal conductivity. (Use of the higher values represented "worst case" conditions, i.e. higher pumping rates would be required.)

The aquifer characteristics based on the recent aquifer testing are summarized, by well, on Table III, and the averages are:

Portion of Transmissivity Storage Coefficient Vertical Hydraulic Aguifer (gpd/ft) (dimensionless) Conductivity (gpd/ft2)

Shallow 187,500 6.3xi0-3 2 - 99 Deep 78,100 9.8x10-3

These transmissivities are very similar to the, previously reported values. The storage coefficients are also within the same orders of magnitude as the previous results. The similarity of the storage-coefficient in the shallow and deep portions is probably due to the interconnection between the two portions. The range of the vertical hydraulic conductivity is somewhat greater than previously reported, but it is still less than that used for the mathematical simulation. It should be noted that the reported ranges do not include some of the values from SC6D and SCIOS. As discussed in the previous section, some of the values from SC6D are not considered representative due to the proximity of the wells at the Vineland Car Wash, i.e. Wells SC6S/6D and RW6S/6D.

Overall, the recent aquifer testing results indicate that the aquifer characteristics used for the mathematical simulation of the ground water remediation system are appropriate.


*1

Table I C

Well Information Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation

Newfield, New Jersey

Well No. or Permit Date Elevation Hole Casing Type / Name Ntunber Installed (fttmsl} Diameter (in) Diameter (in)

- --- -------- ----------- --------- ------------- ------------

On-Site Monitoring Wells (i.e. on SMC plant property)

dwl dw2 dw3 dw4 dw5

A B C I) E F 0l(s) G2(d) H I J K L

WI

51-225

51-226

51-142 51-143 51-144 51-145 51-146 51-1,17 51-148 51-149 51-150 51-151

51-152 51-153

Before 1970 Before 1970 Before 1970 Before 1970 Before 1970

1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971

110.92

94.82 94.33 96.29 99.42 98.92

108.58 104.74 104.59 103.02 95.09

99.18 103.51

1-29-74 98.60

W2 51-218 5-21-74 W3 --- 5-17-74

W3S W3D W4 W8

IWC1 IWC2 IWC3 IWC4 IWC5

31-25760 31-25759 51-219

51-220 51-221 51-222 51-223' 51-224

12-05-86 12-05-86 5-08-74

10-18-74

1-74 1-74 1-74 1-74 1-74

SC7S 31-23366-0 7-31-85

100.84

108.37 107.85 104.58 97.44

98.13 98.51' 97.83 98.61 98.03

107.41

J J J J J J 3 J J J J J J

8

8 8

8 8 8

10

J

J 8

8

Steel/2

Steel/2

Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2

PVC/4

PVC/4 PVC/4

PVC/4 PVC/4 PVC/4 PVC/6

Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2 Steel/2

PVC/4

Total Depth

Drilled

Total Depth Cased

Screened Interval

94 94 94

124 46 85 47 48 41 49

128 54 46 46 46 52

124 46 85 47 48 41 49

128 54 46 46 46 52

114-124 36-46 75-85 37-47 38-48 31-41 39-49

118-128 44-54 36-46

36-46 42-52

160 122 18-23/38-43/ 58-63/78-83/ 118-123

142 120 55-60/116-120 142 125 15-20/30-35/

120-125 63 62 42-62

111 108 88-108 162 75 55-75 140 126 35-45/80-100/

115-126

20 40 60 80'

100

20 40 60 80

100

15-20 35-40 55-60 75-80' 95-100

31 30 15-30

Condition

Destroyed Good

Destroyed Good

Destroyed

Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Destroyed Good Good

Good

Good Sealed

Good Good Good Good

Good, Good, Good, Good' Good

Good

Comments

To be sealed. Gravel Interval 122-160.

Replaced with W3S/W3D.

Cemented from 80-162 feet. To be sealed. Gravel over entire casing length.

See Notes at endor Table 1. Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

C-

S ............................................................................................... -- 7 .... . ........ -- ---..............................

(-�.

Table I (cont'd)

Well Information Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation

Newfleld, New Jersey

Total Total Well No. or Permit Date Elevation Hole Casing Type / Depth Depth Screened

Name Number Installed (ft,msl) Diameter (in) Diameter (in) Drilled Cased Interval Condition ---- ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------

On-Site Monitoring Wells 1cont'd)

SC8S 31-23367-8 7-31-85

SC9S 31-23368-6 8-01-85

S•IIS 31-29139-2 9-01-88

SCI2S 31-29140-6 9-02-88

SCI3S 31-29570-3 9-09-88

107.66

96.23

108.33

104.76

101.41

8

8

5

5

5

PVC/4

PVC/4

PVC/2

PVC/2

PVC/2

31 30

31 30

27

25

26

27

25

24.7

15-30

15-30

20-27

15-25

14.7-24.7

Comments

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

See Notes at end of Table I.

Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

-c Q

.1

(

Table I (cont'd) ( Well Information

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation Newfield, New Jersey

Well No. or Permit Date Elevation Ntme ,.. Number Installed I ft,msl) - - - - - - -------.. . .. .. . .. --- -- -- - - --------

Ofr-Site Monitoring Wel's

W5 --- 5-30-74 W6 --- 6-13-74 ---

W7

SCIS SCID

SC2D

SC3S' SC3D

SC4S SC4D

SC5D

SC6S SC6D

SCIOl)

IW2

IW1W4

SMC House

10-08-74

31-28825-1 6-22-88 31-21619-6 5-30-84

31-31620-0 6-01-84

31-28914-2 6-08-88 31-21621-8 6-06-84

31-21689-7 6-07-84 31-21690-1 6-08-84

31-21876-8 6-12-84

31-21691-5 6-21-84 31-21878-4 6-26-84

31-23369 31-23370

31-23369

31-21877

11-11-85 11-12-85

11-12-85

6-19-84

"87.26 90.90

90.62

-90.32

88'90

93.65 92.64

97.00

94.62 94038

95.38 95.72

-9618

'96.94

Hole Dlazm.ter (in) •-------- ---

8 8

8

8 5

5

8 5

5

-5

5

12 5

8 8

8

10

Casing Type / Depth Depth Screened Diameter (In) Drilled Cased Interval Condition

PVC/4 PVC/4

PVC/4

PVC/4 PVC/2

PVC/2

PVC/4 PVC/2

PVC/2

PVC/2

PVC/2

PVC/2 PVC/6 PVC/2

PVC/4 PVC/4

PVC/6

PVC/6 PVC/5

142 95 75-95 182 120 15-20/35-40/

55-60/75-80/ 95-100/115-120

122 100 20-25/95-100

80 55 35-55 125 115 85-95/100-115

115 115 65-85/95-115

65 55 35-55 121 108 78-88/98-108

45 -45 35-45 120 120 110-120

"120 120 90-120

80 75 .45-75, 95 95 Blank Casing

125 125 110-120

60 55 '35-55

127 125 105-125

70 70 40-70

40 40 Blank Casing 130 120 40-65/105-130

Sealed Sea led

Unknown

Good Good

GooI

Good

Good Good

Good

Good

Good Good

,Good

Good

Good

Good

Comments

Sealed wl NJDEP approval in 1970's. Sealed w/ NJDFP approval in 1970's.

Has not been found, possibly sealed.

Permission withdrawn for sampling. Permission withdrawn for sampling.

0

Originally private well.

Originally private well.

end of Table I.

Den Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

See Notes at---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

j I

Table I (cont'd) Well Information

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation Newfield, New Jersey

Well No. or Permit Date Elevation Hole Casing Type / Depth Depth Screened Name Number Installed (ft,msl) Diameter (in) Diameter in) lDrilled Cased Interval

---------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Condition Comments --- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recovery Wells

Layne 51-154 1971 94.11 w4 31-19648 10-17-82 94.43

RW6S 31-28710 6-16-88 92.70 RW6D 31-28711 8-05-88 93.08

RIW2 31-28712 8-02-88 91.52

8 12

14 14

14

Steel/6 PVC/6

PVC/8 PVC/8

PVC/8

170 47 42-47 140 130 110-130

80 75 55-75 127 125 90-125

60 75 30-55

Good Good

Good Good

Good

Gravel Interval 54-106.

Private Wells (Note: Only wells specifically discussed in this report are listed here. Information on other private wells provided in Weston February 1972 report and DRAI October 1984 report.)

Moluna-Shaj low

-Deep

Zip's Garage

100 --

-.... 102.81

Merlie-Shallow -

-Deep --

Steel/4

Steel/2

-- 80 -

70 64-70

Good Not used. Good Used for domestic supply.

Good Not used.

Good Not used. Information from Mr. Merlie. Good Shallow well installed when house

built, deep well installed 1955-1965.

-- 4-05-83 90.33

-.... 91.05

31-28083-8 31-28084-6 31-28085-4 31-28086-2 :11-28087-I

31-27957-1 31-27953-8 31-27954-6 31-27956-2

PVC/6

Steel/4

-- 62 32-62(?) Good Used occasionally for irrigation.

-- 60 --

104.65 99.46

103.75 9b.47 97.07

103.03

96.42 94.73 94.23 94.24

Good Not used.

Good Good Good Good Good Good

Good Good Good Good

Destroyed

Elevations from survey performed by Albert A. Frelinger, Jr., P.A., in August 1989, except for Zip's well which was from survey performed by Jack C. Hann in July 1984. J indicates well was Installed using jetting technique. Dashes indicate information not available.


(�.

'WI

IW3

Andrews AMW#1 AMW#2 AMW#3 AMW#4 AMW#5 AMW#6

(t I ena GMW#I G•W#2 GMW#3 GMW#4 GHW#5

Notes: (I)

(2) (3)

(

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

Table II

Aqufer Testing Chronology Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation

,(ewfeld, ,ew Jersey

July 2i, 1939

well No.Puin•Ong Wate

(GPM)OnOff

41:58 14:30

July 27, 1989

Layne W'7

RW6S

July 28, 1989

W9 Layne RW6S W9 Layne RW6S RW60

Layne RW6S RW60

July 31. !.89

W9 Layne RW6S RW6O RIW2

!2:13 14:5! 16:46

10:07:33 10:09 10:43 10:58 10:5r8 10:58 13:00 16:02 16:10 16:35 1!:40

14:40 14:45 15:15 15:20 !7:17

13:30:30 19:23

18:00 - 8:3C

18:00

10:45 10:45 14:07 14:07 14:07 14:07 16:45 16:45 16:45 16:45

17:20 17:20 17:%0 17:20 17:210

5o

50 50

50 50

100 50 !0

-100 -!cc 50 50 1^0 1!00

50 100

100

August 1, 1989

Remeciaticn system was never trought cn-line.

August 2, 193r

Remediation system was never Drought on-line.

August 3, 1989

RIW2 14:03 16:45

Dan Raviv Associates. Inc. JOD NO. 5'153I2

94

(.j

Table IIl Summary of Calculated Aquifer Characteristics

1988-1989 Testing Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation - Newtfield, New Jersey

Drawdown

Pumping Pumping Rate

Date Well(s) (gpm)

Distance to Pumped

Obsv. Well Well(s) (feet)

Theis, llantush or Boulton

T S r/B or r/D (gpd/ft) I --- ) ( --- ) (gpd/ft2)

Jacob

T S (gpd/ft) (---)

Distance

T (gpd/ft)

Recovery

Jacob

S T (---) (gpd/ft)

0ulC•: oo hiltCCO/AJa/UU fU'• £10 ..............- - --- --.

SC6S 5 .. ...... 575,500 ...... 230,200 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8/16/88 RW6D ..-- -- -- - ..-

309 lIst run) SC6D 10 26,200 5.6xi0-2 0.075 235 96,000 8.OxiO-4 .... 52,600 298 (2nd run) SC6D 10 28,500 3.OxIO-3 0.05 114 87,400 ...... 52,500

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8/17/88 RIW2 -- .. ....

262 (Ist run) IW2 110 103,500 4.6xi0-4 1.0 -- 125,800 2.lxlO-4 .... 111,600 273 (2nd run) SC3S 269 120,300 1.2x10-3 -- . 144,100 6.OxiO-4 .... 103,000

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7/26/89 W9 50 .. .... ...... 26,400 ...... 10,400

50 .. .... ...... 26,400 ...... 10,700 50 .. .... ...... 33,000 -....-

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------7/27/89 Layne 50 .-- -- . 440,000 -- 37,700 3.8xlO-2 -

B 103 79,600 4.0xi0-4 0.2 2 264,000 5.2x10-6 --.... C 102 57,300 5.9x10-3 0.8 99 220,000 2.4x10-2 ...... E 191 -- -- -- 220,000 1.2x10-4 ...... I 28 30,200 2.0x10-3 0.3 21 220,000 ........ K 168 -- -- -- 330,000 9.8xi0-3 ......

SC9S 96 24,900 2.3x10-3 1.0 32 440,000 ........ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7/27/89 RW6S 100 ............--....

SC6S 5 -- -- -- 220,000 ........ SC6D 10 76,400 4.5x10-1 0.6 11,000 203,100 4.2x10-l -- . .... SCIOS 291 -- -- -- 713,500 1.7xi0-6 ...... SCIOD 305 39,500 1.7x10-3 1.5 38 330,000 8.8x10-4 ......

8/3/89 RIW2 100 ........ 132,000 -- 101,500(S) 2.5x10-2(S) -....-- -- --. 132,000(D) 6.8x10-3(D) -

IWI 279 176,300 2.5x1O-3 0.6 -- 264,000 7.0x10-4 ...... IW2 110 127,300 5.8x10-4 0.4 -- 165,000 2.8xi0-4 ......

SC2D 227 95,500 8.9x10-3 0.4 jL. 203,100 3.3x10-4 .....

Averages: T - 206,100 gpdl/ft. (Shallow) 85,500 gpd/ft (Deep). S - 6.0xI0-3 (Shallow) l.OxlO-1 (Deep) 13.7xi0-3 without SC6D1.

Notes: (1) Well locations are shown on Figure 1. (2) See Appendices C and D for tables of water level measurements during testing and graphical analyses. (3) Dashes indicate method not applicable to data or data indicates very little or erratic change in drawdown. (4) Wells IW2 and IW4 are no longer considered private wells because the property was purchased by SMC. (5) Values from Wells W9, SC2D, SC6D, and SCIOD used for "deep" average, all others used for "shallow".


( y. C

J•Iu

C

Date Sampled '

DRAI Sample Number

laboratory laboratory Number

12/17/88

W3S-F

24056

W3S-U

HT HT' 24057 24058

SHC

4/25/89

W3S-F W3S-U W3S-P

H25 H SHC HT 28500 28501 ý28501

-- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

RADIOILOXICAL PARAHETDS (pCi/L}

Gross Alpha GrossBeta Total Uranium Thorium 230

<5 <6 <1 <1

<5 <6 <1 <1

3.7 4/- 1.i 6.9 4/- 1.8

4.4 +1- 1.2 7.6 +/- 1.9

<1 <3

,Thorium 232 1< <1 ............ --------------------------------------------------------- --------- -

6 d O •lJ - PAIIANMiRH (ppn)

.. -- 5.48 -- - 4.79 -

Total Chromium - -- 0.011 <0;05- -- <- (0.05 -

Slfexavalent Chromium .. .. 0.016 <0.05 -- <0.05

Sodium -- -- 7.4' <10 .... <10

Sulfate .. .. 5.3 12 .... <10

S---------------------- -------- - -

See Notes at. end of Table VII.

Dan Raviv Associates, Inc.Job No. 83C152

Table VII

Summary of Analytical Results - Radiological Parameters Quarterly Sampling of "Slag Area" Wells Shieldalloy Hetallurgical Corporation


W3S - BackgroundWell No.

C)

--------------------------------------------------------

Table VII (cont'd)

Summary of Analytical Results - Radiological Parameters Quarterly Sampling of "Slag Area" Wells Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation


Well No. W3S - Background (cont'd)

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number

laboratory laboratory Number

8/1/89

W3S-F

Teledyne 74125

W3W-U

Teledyne 74126

9/28/89

W3S-Pl

Teledyne 74127

W3S-F

Teledyne 79770

W3S-U

Teledyne 79771

W3S-P

Teledyne 79772

RADIOLoGICAL PARAMLT S (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha <2.0 1.2 +/ -0.8 <0.4 <2.0 <2.0 <0.4 Gross Beta 6.6 t/- 1.7 7.5 +/ -1.8 <0.8 6.2 t/- 3.3 7.6 +/- 3.4 <0.7 Total Uranium............ Thorium 230 ............ Thorium 232 ...........

INORGANIC PARAKMFES (ppm)

----------------------

Total Chromium ............ Hexavalent Chromium .......... Sodium ............ Sulfate ...........

See Notes at end of Table VIE.


( ( (

(7Table VII (cont'd)



12/17/88

DRAI Sample Number

Laboratory Laboratory Number

W2-F

HT 24069

W2-U

HT HT 24070 24071

SHC

W2-F

H•r 28509

W2-U

HT SHC 28510 -

RAI)IOLCGICAL PARAHET2RS (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha -<2 <2 .. 1 - (<1) 1.9 +1- 1.0 -

Gross Beta 40+/- 4 39+/- 4 .... 12+/- 2 (14 +/- 2) 14 +/- 2 -

Total Uranium ............. Thoritun 230 .............. Thorilum 232 ..............

-INORGANIC PARAHETERS (ppm)

P11 ...... 6.34 .... 6.09 Total Chromium .... 0.010 <0.05 - -- -- <0.05 Hexavalent Chromium -- -- <6 <0.05 - -- <0.05 Sodium .... 120 124 .... 46 Sulfate .... 220 253 .... 90

See Notes-at eri of Table VII.

- Dan Raviv Associates, Inc. Job No. 83C152

C

Well No.

Date Sampled

W2

)

4/25/89

Table VII (cont'd)



Well No.

Date Sampled

DI)AI Sample Number

laboratory Laboratory Number

W2 (cont'd)

8/1/89

W2-F

Teledyne 74132

W2-U

Teledyne 74133

W2-P

Teledyne 74134

W2-F

Teledyne 79767

RADIOLCOICAL PARAMETERS (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha <3.0 <4.0 <0.4 <2.0 <2.0 <0.4 Gross Beta 20 +/- 0.4 24 +/- 0.5 <0.8 14 /-0.4 12 ÷/- 0.4 <0.7 T o ta l U ra n ium ..... ..-- Thorium 230 ............ Thorium 232 ............

1NW)HANIC PARAMETERS (ppm)

Total Chromium ............ Hexavalent Chromium ............ Sodium ............ Sulfate ...........

See Notes at end of Table VII.


( (

9/28/89

W2-U

Teledyne 79768

W2-P2

Teledyne 79769

(Table VII (cont'd)



12/17/88

DRT Sample Number


SCII-F

2T 24059

Sd I-U

MrT 24060

HrT 24061

SCll-F

SHC HT HT -- 28502 28503

SCl1-U

SNO

SCl1S-F SCllS-U SCIIS-P1

Teledyne Teledyne Teledyne 74121 74122 74123

RADIOIOGICAL PARAMEMES (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha <2 4.0 +/- 2.6 .... <1 5.5 +/- 1.3 <5.0 5.4 +/- 3.7 <0.5 <0.4 Gross Beta 3.8 +/- 2.0 28 +/- 8 .... <3 75. +/- 1.9 <8.0 16.0 +/- 0.7 <0.7 <0.8 Total Uranium <1 3.9_+/- 1.0 -- -- -- -

Uranium 234 -- ........ 2.6 */- 1.1 0.33 +/- 1.8 .. f U ran ium 235 - ......... <1 .. <0 .1 .... Uranium 238 .......... 2.8 +/- 1.1 .... 0.33 +/- 2.0 .... .'l iro lum .2 28 . - ........ . <1 .... < 10 .0 .... Thorium 230 <1 <1 ...............--. Thorium 232 <1 <1 ...... <1 .... <3.0 .... *Radium 226 -- -- ....... 1.2 0/- 0.2 .... 1.4 +/- 0.8 ....

--- --- --- -- --- --- --- -- ---- - -_-----------------------------------

INORGANIC PARAMMIRS (ppm)

PH-- .-- 6.52 -- - 6.62 ......

Total Chromium .... 0.070 0.24 .... 0.41 ........

Hexavalent Chromium -- -- 0.058 0.24 .... <0.05 ........

S o d i um . .. . 1 2 1 6 . .. . 1 3 . .. .. .. .

Sulfnte .... 60 81 -- -- 42 ........

S-------------------------------------------------------See Notes at end of Table-VII.


(

Well No.

Date Sampled

SCIIS I

( ;

4/26/89 8/1/89,

SClIS-P2

Teledyne 74124

" \

Table VII (cont'd)

Summry of Analytical Results - Radiological Parameters Quarterly Sampling of "Slag Area" Wells Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation


Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


10/26/88

SC12-U

AKEN (NUS) P0103719

12/17/88

SC12-F

24062

4/25/89

SCl2-UA B)

HT 24063 (41

Hr 24065

SC12-F

Kr 28504

SC12-U

HT 28505

RADIOLMICAL PAILARUEHS (pCi/L)

Cross Alpha 5.6 ÷/- 3.1 4.5 +/- 2.0 <3 1<3] .... 4.0 +/- 1.6 4.4 + 1- 1.4 -- <2 Gross Beta 83 +/-9 59 /-6 100 +/- 10 1130 +/- 20] 71 /-8 38 +/-4 -- <3 Total Uranium -- <I <2 [<2] ..........-Thorium 230 -- <1 <1 12.8 +/- 0.6] ............ Thorium 232 -- <1 <1 [<1] ............

INORGANIC PARAHETE:S (ppm)

P11 ......-- 7.55 .... 6.98 -Total Chromium ...... 1.30 0.76 .... 0.84 -Hexavalent Chromium ...... 0.78 0.59 .... <0.05 -Sodium ...... 200 229 .... 182 -Sulfate ...... 46 81 .... 79 -


(


Q

Well No. SC12S

SHC

SCIZ-P

HT 28505

(

Well No.

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS

. Gross Alpha " Gross Beta

Total Uranium Thorium 230 " "- TFhrn~it 232

CTable VII (cont'd)



SC12S (cont'd)

8/1/89

SC12-F

Teledyne 74128

SC12-U

Teledyne 74129

SC12-PI

Teledyne 74130

9/28/89

SC12-P2

Teledyne ý 74131

SC12-F

Teledyne 79773

SC12-U

Teledyne 79774

SC12-P2

Teledyne 79775

(pCi/L)

<5.0 39 +/- 0.9

<9.0 73+/- 1.7

<0. 5 <0.7

<0.4 <0.8

<9.0 69 +1- 1.5

<9.0 70 +/- 1.5

<0.4 <0. 7

INORGANIC PARAMEKIMS (pPM)

Total Chromium .... -Hexavalent airt.ii- . -CSodium -..... - - -Sulfate . .......

Thru 232


/ SDan aviv Associated, Inc. Job'No. 9=82

------------

- - ; -- - - - - - - - -

-7

Table VII (cont'd)



SC135

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


10/26/88

SC13-U

MEN (NUS) P0102740

12/17/88

SC13-F

0r 24066

4/25/89

SC13-U

HT 24067

SC-13F

2r 24068

HT 28506 1285081

RADIOWGICAL PARAKMTRS (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha 7.1 ÷/- 3.4 <2 <2 - - 10 /-2 (7.2 +/- 1.81 <2 Gross Beta 19 /-4 12 +/- 3 14 +/-3 - - 25 +/-3 [31 /-4 18+/-2 Total Uranium - <2 2.1/-1.0 - - - [--] -

Uranium 234 ...-- .... 6.5 4/- 1.4 (4.4 4/- 1.0] - -(Laboratory Duplicate) ..- [(4.3 4/- 1.0)] -

Uranium 235 ........ <1 [<1 (<I)] -Uranium 238 ........ 5.5 ÷/ 1.2 [5.1 +/- 1.1]

(Laboratory Duplicate) ........ . [(5.6 +/- 1.1)] Thorium 228 .. <1 [<1 (<1)] Thorium 230 -- <1 <1 . [-] -Thorium 232 <1 <1 <1 [<1 (2.1 4/- 0.4)] -) Radium 226 ...- - < [.0 1/-0.11 -

INODANIC PARAKMRS (ppm)

PH .- 6.56 - (-] - 6.47 Total Chromium - - - 0.076 0.16 - - [-] - <0.05 Hexavalent Chromium ..... 0.095 0.16 - [-] - <0.05 Sodium - - 190 286 - [-] - 186 Sulfate .... 310 409 - [-- - 259

28507

See Notes at en of Table VII.


C

\ /

Well No.

SC-13U

SHOHT

C

C,Table VII (cont'd)

Summry of Analytical Results - Radiological Parameters Quarterly Sampling of "Slag Area" Wells Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation


C ,

Well No. SC13S(cont'd)

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


8/1/89

SC13-U

Teledyne 74135

SC13-F

Teledyne 74136

SC13-P1

Teledyne 74137

SC13-P2

Teledyne 74138

SC13-F

Teledyne 79779

SC13-U

Teledyne 79780

9/28/89

SC13-PI

Teledyne 79781

SC13-P2

Teledyne 79766

RADIOL)GICAL PARAMETES (rCi/L)

-Gross Alpha <20.0 <1.0 - <0.5 <0.4 <10.0 <10.0 <0.6 <0.4 Gross Beta <40.0 30 +/- 1.4 <0.7 <0.8 <20.0 <20.0 0.85 +/- 5.3 <0.7 Total Uranium .. -.... -Uranium 234 .............

(Laboratory Duplicate) } ......... Uranium 235 .......... Uranium 238 - - - -7 .....

S. . .. ( L a b o r a t o r y D u p l i c a t e ) . .. .. ..-... '. Thorium 228 ,- .........

Thorium 230 .......... 7Thorium 232 . .. . . ..... . Radium 226 ...........

INORGANIC PARAMLTES (ppm)

------------- --

'Total Chromium , ........... Hexavalent Chromium .......... Sodium ........... Sulfate -... -



Table VII (cont'd)

Summary of Analytical Results - Radiologio Quarterly Sampling of "Slag Area Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corpo


Well No.

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


A

12/17/88

A-F

HT 24072

A-U

MT 24073

MT 24074

I Parameters Wells

atlon

4/25/89

A-F

HT 28511

A-U

HT SHC 28512

RADIOLOGICAL PARAMMR-S (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha <2 <2 .... <2 <2 -

Gross Beta 4.7 +/- 2.2 9.1 +/- 2.4 -- - <3 3.2 +/- 1.7 -

T o t a l U r a n i u m . .... ...-.

Thorium 230 ........... Thorium 232 ........

------------ --------------

INORG.ANIC PARMA4ETs (pum)

PH ... - 10.70 - - 10.32

Total Chromium .... 29.0 32.47 - -- 35.36

Hexavalent Chromium - - 23.3 32.36 - - 37.26

Sodium .... 150 180 - - 153

Sulfate - 49 82 - - 57

--------------------------- --------------- ----------



((. Q

-----------------

I

(

Well No.

Date Sampled

DRAI Sample Number


A (cont'd)

8/1/89

A-F

Teledyne 74140

A-U

Teledyne 74139

A-PI

Teledyne 74141

A-P2

Teledyne 74142

A-F

Teledyne 79778

9/28/89

A-U

Teledyne 79778

A-P2

Teledyne 79778

RADIOLOGICAL PARAMMERS (pCi/L)

Gross Alpha (4.0 <5.0 <0.5 <0.4 <3.0 <3.0 <0.4

Gross Beta <5.0 <6.0 <0.7 <0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.7

Total Uranium ....-- -- -- -- -

Thorium 230 .... . . .......... Thorium 232 .. , . .. -- -, -

---------------------------------------------------------------. .... .. .... ..-------------------------------------

INORGANIC PARAMETERS (ptxn)

------ ----- ------ ----

Total Chromium .. --...... ...

lexavalent Chromium ..... "--- ...... S od iu m . .. .. .. .. .. .. .

Sulfa te ..............

Ns aeaosn u e (r2 ieeyst-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes: (1) Sample locations shown on Figure 1. Well SC12S (or SC12) was inadvertently listed on the 10/88forms as SC13. Samples collected by DRAI. HTr MetaTRACE, Inc. of Earth City, Missouri.

AKF2= AnalytiKE}, Inc. (subcontracted to NUS Corp. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

SMC SHC Laboratory in Newfield, New Jersey. '.

Teledyne = Teledyne Isotopes of Westwood, New Jersey. "F" notation signifies filtered sample. "U" notation signifies unfiltered sample. "P" notation signifies filter paper sample.

Less than (<) indicates compound not detected above the listed minimum detection limit.

Dashes (--) indicate analysis not requested. Field duplicates are in brackets. Well SCI1S was sampled in October 1988 for radiological analyses, but the sample bottle was

broken in transit.


C Table VII (cont'd)



(

(2)

(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

,.\

Pumping Test Analysis - July 1994

From:

"Preliminary Report Ground Water Contamination Study

Phase II:

Woodward-Moorhouse and Associates, Inc., September 1974

Section J.l

Section J.2

Section J.3

APPENDIX J

IWC Pumping Test,' 29-31 July 1974

Basic Theory of Pumping Test Analysis

Analyses of IWC Pumping Test

References

T�M :

4 %57�

/9VJ

�1

I I

J.l Basic Theory of Pumping Test Analysis

J.l.l Theis Formula. Theis (1935) developed a formula for

describing the nonsteady drawdown distribution in the vicinity of a

pumping well. Several assumptions are necessary for application of

-the Theis formula:

- The aquifer is homogeneous, isotropic, of uniform

thickness, and effectively infinite in areal extent.

- The initial piezometric surface or water table is

nearly horizontal.

- The discharge rate is constant and the pumped well

is open throughout the entire thickness of the aquifer.

- The diameter of the pumped well is negligible com

pared with the overall dimensions of the aquifer.

Under these assumptions, the drawdown distribution is given by

s = (114.6 Q/T) W(u), (i)

where u = 2693 r 2 S/Tt, (2)

with s = drawdown at time t and radial distance r from the pumped well, ft.

Q = (constant) well discharge, gpm

T = transmissivity of the aquifer, gpd/ft

r = radial distance from the pumped well to a point of drawdown observation, ft.

S = storage coefficient of the aquifer, nondimensional

t = elapsed time since pumping started, min

W(u), termed the "nonleaky well function",is the

negative of the exponential integral of -u.

The Theis formula can be applied to pumping test

analysis by plotting u vs.W(u) and t vs. s on full-logarithmic

graphs of the same scale. The graphs are then overlain and values

of u, W(u), t, and s at a convenient match point are substituted

into the following formulas:

T = 114.6 Q W(u)/s (3)

S = Tut/(2693 r 2 ) (4)

J-1

J.l.2 Jacob Method of Analysis. Jacob (Cooper and

Jacob, 1946) noted that for'smali values of u, -(uS 0.01),

W (u) =-0.5772 I in u

and s -(114.6 Q/T) (0.5772 + ln u) (5)

From equations (1) and (2), it is seen that s~is proportional to ln(t)

for constant r. Thus a semi-logarithmic plot of s vs. t, with

t plotted on the logarithmic axis, should give a straight line. The

,aquifer parameters can be determined from the slope of the straight

,line and the intercept, of the extrapolated line with the zero-draw

down axis by applying the following formulas:

T = 264Q/As , (6)

S = Tto/h790r 2 (7)

where, in addition to the parameters defined above,

As = drawdown difference per log.cycle, ft.

to = intercept of extrapolated straight line with zero-drawdown axis, -min.

J.l.3. Recovery Analysis. When pumping of the well is

terminated, the water level in the well will recover toward its

initial value. For small u, the residual drawdown, s', can be

expressed as:

(264Q/T).iog (t/t'), (8) where,

t = time since pumping, started

t'= time since pumping stopped

Tcan thus be determined from the6 slope of a semi'-logairithmic plot

of s' versus t/t'.

J.l.4 Partial Pene&atrion f' Pumping Well. The "above

theories are based in' part on theý assumption thaCethe pumping well

completely penetrates the Saturated'thickness of "the-'aquifer, so

that flow is purely horizontal. -If the well only partially pene-

J-2

trates the aquifer, vertical flow components can be significant

within a distance of (1.5)b from the well, where b is the saturated

thickness. In such a case, the observed drawdown measurements

should be corrected for the effects of partial penetration before the

above analyses are applied.

If the pumped well and observation well are open at approxi

mately the same elevation, the following formula can be applied: S = CPO Spp (9)

If the pumped well penetrates the top of the aquifer and the observa

tion well the bottom, or vice versa, the following equation can be

used:

S = [Cpo /(2Cpo -i)] Spp (10)

For measurements of drawdown in the pumping well, the following formula

can be applied: S = Cpp SPP (11)

In the above formulas, Spp = observed drawdown under partially-penetrating

conditions

s = equivalent drawdown for fully-penetrating conditions

Cpo = partial penetration constant for observation

well, fraction Cpp = partial penetration constant for pumping well,

fraction

Tables of Cpo and Cpp are readily available (Butler, 1957; Walton,

1962) and will not be reproduced here.

A type curve method of solving for T and S can be developed

from the solution obtained by Hantush (1961) for flow to partially

penetrating wells. For a relatively long period of time, such that

t >b 2 S/2T, the drawdown in an observation well is given by,

s = (114.6 Q/T) [W(u) + fs (r/b, 1/b, d/b, l'/b, d'/b)], (12)

where, in addition to the parameters defined previously, we have

b = saturated thickness of aquifer, ft.

1 = depth to bottom of screen in pumped well, ft.

J-3

d = depth to top of screen in pumped well, ft.

1'= depth to bottom of screen in observation well, ft.

d'= depth to top of screen in observation well, ft.

is is an infihite series involving Bessel and trigonometric functions,

and can be readily evaluated. f s is independent"'f time,-and thus is

a constant for a given observation well.

Equation (12) can be used to construct a full-logarithmic

type curve ,of u vs. w(u)+fs, which can be overlain on a full

logarithmic plot of t vs. ,s to obtain a match point, from which

values of T and S can be obtained as discussed in Section J.l.1.

,J.1.5 Analysis of Leaky Aquifers. The above formulas are

based in part on the assumption that the aquifer is confined above

and below by impermeable strata. This is rarely the case in

practice, and the aquifer is usually subject to "leakage" through

the confining layers. Hantush.(Hantush and Jacob, 1955) obtained

the drawdown distribution in the vicinity of a well pumping from a

leaky aquifer:

s = (114.6Q/T) W(u,r/B), (13)

where, in addition to the parameters defined previously,

r/B = r/ IT/(K'/b')

K' = vertical hydraulic conductivity of confining bed, gpd/ft 2

= thickness of confining bed, ft.

W(u,r/B), the--"leaky well function," can be expressed as an infinite

series similar-to W(u). Equation (13) can be used to define type

curves and applied to the calculation of T and S by overlaying full

logarithmic plots of the type-curve. and the measured field data, as

discussed-previously.

J.2 Analyses of IWC Pumping Test

J.2.1 Applicable Test Data. A pumping test was conducted

at the IWC during 29-31 July 1974., Well WI-P4 (P4) was pumped for

24 hours at an average discharge rate of 31.5 gpm, and water levels

were periodically measured in wells Wl, Wl-Pl (PI), Wl-P2 (P2),

Wl-P3 (P3), and W1-P5 (P5). Pumping was then terminated, and the

recovery of the water level in P4"was monitored for 6 hours.

The only date which proved to be sufficient for quantitative

analysis were the drawdown data from well P1, and the recovery data

from well P4. The data were analyzed under a variety of assumptions

regarding the nature of the aquifer:

- The aquifer was treated as being confined. This is reason

able since the maximum observed drawdown during the 24-hour pumping

test (0.44 foot in well P5) was very small compared with the total

thickness of the aquifer (120 feet).

- Partial penetration corrections were applied. Although

hydrochemical evidence indicates stratification of the aquifer,

vertical permeabilities may be high enough that partial-penetration

effects are significant. A match of observed data with the partial

penetration type curve was also made.

- If the stratification of the aquifer is significant enough,

the aquifer may behave as if fully-penetrated but leaky. Thus, the

observed data were also matched with the leaky artesian type curve.

J.2.2 Analyses. The results of the various analyses are

summarized in Table J.1, and discussed below.

The recovery data from well P4 were analyzed by the Jacob

method, equation (8). No corrections were applied to the data.

This analysis does not allow an estimate of the storage coefficient S.

The drawdown data from well P1 were analyzed by the Jacob

method, equations (5) and (6), both with and without correcting

the data for partial penetration. The analysis based on the

approximate partial penetration correction, equation (10), is not

very reliable. The published tables of values of Cpo have entries

for a minimum fractional penetration of 0.3, and a minimum distance

to the observation well of (0.3)b. In the present case, the

fractional penetration is 5/120 = 0.04 and the distance to the ob

servation well is (0.125)b, so a double extrapolation must be made in

. J-5

order to estimate Cpo.

The drawdown data from well P1 were also analyzed by the

Hantush leaky aquifer type curve method, equation (13), as well as

the Hantush partial-penetration type curve method, equation (12).

J.2.3 Discussion of Analyses. The results shown in Table J.1

indicate-reasonable agreement among values of transmissivity determined

by the various methods of analysis. ,Furthermore, these values are of

the same order of magnitude as the average of values of T reported by

Weston from tests on"the Layne well (70,000 gpd/ft). A value of

T = 100,000 gpd/ft will be used in analyses leading to the design and

operation of the contaminant-withdrawal system.

The calculated valuers of the storage coefficient show an

extremely wide variation, from 9X107 to 0.0205. In general, calcula

tions of S from analyses of pumping test data show a similar lack of

consistency. The problem is magnified in the present case by the fact

that different assumptions as to the nature of the aquifer were made

for the different analyses. In future work, a value of S = 0.005 will

be used. This value is consistent with the results of-two of the

present analyses, as well as with the values determined by Weston for

the Layne well tests and with the interpretation of the systen as

behaving as a leaky artesian aquifer.

In general, the IWC pumping test of 29-31 July 1974 did not

provide data sufficient for determination of the hydraulic properties

of the various layers of the aquifer. However, hydraulic evidence

indicating stratification of the aquifer was obtained from the fact

that the data reasonably match a leaky-aquifer type curve, as well

as the fact that the drawdown curve for P1 shows different behavior

from the curves for P2, P3, and P5, which all behave similarly.

j-6

TABLE J.1

CALCULATED VALUES OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS

T(gpd/ft)

90,400 l46,ooo

59,8oo

97,600

241,000**

S Method of Analysis

-- Jacob, uncorrected

0.0oh Jacob, uncorrected

9X10-7 Jacob, approximate correction for partial. penetration

0.0205 Hantush leaky type curve, uncorrected

8X10- 6 Hantush partial penetration type curve, non-leaky

98,500

Recovery (R) or drawdown (D) data.

Excluded from calculation of mean.

d

J-7

Well

WI-P4

Wi-Pi

Wi-Pi

Wi-Pi

WI-PI

R or D*

R

D

D

D

D

Mean

*

**

J.3 References

Butler, Stanley S. (1957): Engineering Hydrologv, Prentice-Hall,

Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 356 pp.

Cooper, H. H., Jr., C. E. Jacob (1946): A generalized graphical

method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing

well-field history, Trans, Am. Geophys. Union, vol., 27.

Hantush, Mahdi S. (1961): Aquifer tests on partially penetrating

wells, Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., Hydraulics Division, HYS,

171-195.

Hantush, M. S. and C. E. Jacob (1955): Non-steady radial flow in an

infinite leaky aquifer, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, vol. 36.

Theis, C. V. (1935): The relation between the lowering of piezometric

surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well

using ground-water storage, Trans. Am. Geophys, Union, 16th

Annual Meeting, Part 2.

Walton, William C. (1962): Selected analytical methods for well and

aquifer evaluation, Illinois State Water Survey, Bulletin 49,

Urbana, 81 pp.

J-8

ATTACHMENTS

SECTION 4.8

Endangered and Threatened Plant Species Survey

Letter From:

Amy S. Greene Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Dated June 14, 1994

___.e s E. McGreevey Governor

0 eý$tae of cN rr Tjerseg

Department of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry

Office of Natural Lands Management Natural Heritage Program

"P.O. Box 404 Trenton, NJ 08625-0404

Tel. #609-984-1339 Fax. #609-984-1427

Bradley M. Campbell Comrmssioner

August 19,2002,

Kate Lauriat TRC Environmental Corporation 5 Waterside Crossing Windsor, CT 06095

Re: Shieldalloy Metalurgical Corporation

Dear Ms. Lauriat:

Thank you for your data request regarding rare species information for the above referenced project site in Newfield Borough and Vineland City, Gloucester and Cumberland Counties.

The Natural Heritage Data Base does not have any records for rare plants, animals, or natural communities on the site.

The Landscape Project (Version 1.0) shows that suitable habitat patches of emergent wetland, K_.) forest, and forested wetland occur on the project site. It does not have any records for rare species in

those habitat patches. Searches of the Landscape Project only include the specified project site; searches of the Landscape Project in the vicinity of the project site will not be performed. However, Landscape Project data is available for download from the Division of Fish and Wildlife's web site (www.njfishandwildlife.com) or by contacting the Endangered and Nongame Species Program.

Attached is a list of rare species from records in the Natural Heritage Data Base in the general vicinity of the project site (within approximately 5 kilometers). Also attached are lists of rare species and natural communities that have been documented from Gloucester and Cumberland Counties. These county lists can be used as master species lists for directing further inventory work. If suitable habitat is present at the project site, these species have potential to be present. If you have questions concerning the wildlife records or wildlife species mentioned in this response, we recommend you contact the Division of Fish and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program.

PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED 'CAUTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON NIP DATA'.

Thank you for consulting the Natural Heritage Program. The attached invoice details the

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper

payment due for processing this data request. Feel free to contact us again regarding any future data requests.

Sincerely,

Herbert A. Lord Data Request Specialist

cc: Thomas F. Breden Lawrence Niles NHP File No. 02-3907551

i

CAUTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON NATURAL HERITAGE DATA

The quantity and quality of data collected by the Natural Heritage Program is dependent on the research and observations of many individuals and organizations. Not all of this information is the result of comprehensive or site-specific field surveys. Some natural areas in New Jersey have never been thoroughly surveyed. As a result, new locations for plant and animal species are continuously added to the database. Since data acquisition is a dynamic, ongoing process, the Natural Heritage Program cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence, absence, or condition of biological elements in any part of New Jersey.', Information supplied by the Natural Heritage Program summarizes existing data known to the program at the time of the request regarding the biological elements-or locations in question. They should never be regarded as final statements on the elements or areas being considered, nor should they be substituted for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments. The attached data is provided as one source of information to assist others in the preservation of natural diversity.

This office cannot provide a letter of interpretation or a statement addressing the classification of wetlands as defined by the Freshwater Wetlands Act. Requests for such determination should be sent to the DEP Land Use Regulation Program, P.O. Box 401, Trenton, NJ 08625-0401.

The Landscape Project was developed by the Division of Fish & Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program to map critical habitat for rare animal species. Some of the rare species data in the Landscape Project is in the Natural Heritage Database, while other records were obtained from other sources. Natural Heritage Database response letters will list all species (if any) found during a search of the Landscape Project. However, any reports that are included with the response, letter will only reference specific records if they are in the Natural Heritage Database. This* office cannot answer any inquiries about the Landscape Project. All questions, should be directed to the DEP Division of Fish and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongarne Species Program, P.O. Box 400, Trenton, NJ 08625-0400.

This cautions and restrictions notice must be included whenever information provided by the Natural Heritage Database is published.

i Deparment of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry

•Namra Lands Management

13 AUG 2002

GENERAL VICINITY OF PROJECT SITE

RARE SPECIES AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES PRESENTLY RECORDED IN

THE NEW JERSEY NATURAL HERITAGE DATABASE

FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL GRANK

STATUS STATUS STATUS

SRANK DATE OBSERVED IDENT.

*** Vertebrates

HYLA ANDERSONII

NOTROPIS CHALYBAEUS

PITUOPHIS MELANOLEUCUS

MELANOLEUCUS


MELANOLEUCUS

*** Invertebrates

CATOCALA PRETIOSA PRETIOSA

EPITHECA SPINOSA

GOMPHUS APOMYIUS

GOMPHUS APOMYIUS

GOMPHUS APOMYIUS

ITAME SP 1

LITHOPHANE LEMMERI

MACROCHI LO HYPOCRITALI S

MACROCHILO SP 1

MONOLEUCA SEMIFASCIA

ZANCLOGNATHA SP 1

*** Vascular plants

CAREX BARRATTII

CHIONANTHUS VIRGINICUS

COREOPSIS ROSEA

COREOPSIS ROSEA

CUSCUTA CORYLI

CYPERUS RETROFRACTUS

DESMODIUM STRICTUM

DESMODIUM STRICTUM

PINE BARRENS TREEFROG

IRONCOLOR SHINER

NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

E

T

T

PRECIOUS UNDERWING

ROBUST BASKETTAIL

BANNER CLUBTAIL

BANNER CLUBTAIL

BANNER CLUBTAIL

A SPANWORM

LEMMER'S PINION MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

A SLUG MOTH

BARRATTIS SEDGE

FRINGETREE

ROSE-COLOR COREOPSIS


HAZEL DODDER

ROUGH FLATSEDGE

PINELAND TICK-TREFOIL


E

G4 S3 ?77?-??-?

G4 S152 1997-10-04

G4T4 S3 7777-??-??

G4T4 S3 7777-7?-??

G4T2T3

G4

G4

G4

G4

G3

G3G4

G4

G3

G4G5

G3G4

LP G4

G5

LP G3

LP G3

G5

G5

LP G4

LP G4

S2S3 $1

Sl $1 Si

S3

S2

S3S4

S3

S2S3

S3

S4

S3

$2

S2

S2

SH

S2

S2

1996-06-25

1996-04-28

1996-04-28

1996-04-28

1996-04-28

1996-06-18

1997-02-27

1996-07-16

1996-06-11

1996-07-16

1996-07-16

1873-05-7?

1995-06-16

1989-10-17

1899-08-7?

1989-10-17

1903-09-12

1903-09-02

1935-08-13

NAME COMMON NAME

Y

Y

Y

i\

2

13 AUG 2002

GENERAL VICINITY OF PROJECT SITE



NAME COMMON NAME

DESMODIUM STRICTUM

DIOSCOREA VILLOSA VAR

HIRTICAULIS

ELEOCHARIS MELANOCARPA

EUPATORIUM RESINOSUM






HELONIAS BULLATA

MUHLENBERGIA TORREYANA

NYMPHOIDES CORDATA

NYMPHOIDES CORDATA

PASPALUM DISSECTUM

POLYGALA POLYGAMA

PRUNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA

RHYNCHOSPORA INUNDATA

RHYNCHOSPORA PALLIDA

STACHYS HYSSOPIFOLIA

TIPULARIA DISCOLOR

UTRICULARIA PURoUReA

44 Records Processed


HAIRY-STEM WILD YAM

BLACK-FRUIT SPIKE-RUSH

PINE BARREN BONESET

PINE BARREN BONESET

PINE BARREN BONESET

PINE BARREN BONESET

PINE BARREN BONESET

SPINE.BARREN BONESET

SWAMP- PINK

PINE BARREN SMOKE GRASS

FLOATIN!HEART

FLOATINGHEART

MUDBANK CROWN GRASS

RACEMED MILKWORT

CHICKASAW PLUM

SLENDER HORNED-RUSH

PALE BEAKED-'RUSH

HYSSOP HEDGE-NETTLE

CRANEFLY ORCHID

PURPLE BLADDiRWORT

FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL GRANK SHANK


LP G4 $2

G4GST3Q S2

LT

E

E

E

E

E

E E

E

G4

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G3

LP G5

LP, G5

G47

G5

G5T4T5

LP G3G4

G3

G5

G4G5

LP G5

S1

S2

S2

S2

S2

S2

S2

S3

53

S3

S3

S2

S2

S2

S2

S3

S2

S3

S3

DATE OBSERVED IDENT.

1934-09-30 Y

1936-07-07 Y

1992-08-04 Y

1937-09-26 Y

1992-08-04 Y

1985-09-12 Y

1899-08-7? Y

1935-07-16 Y

1887-09-18 Y

1902-04-?? Y

1918-09-28 Y

11985-09-11 - Y

1995-08-10 Y

1992-09-03 Y

1992-08-04 Y

1936-04-19 Y

1992-07-10

1994-07-31 7

1989-10-17 Y

1995-07-24 Y

1995-08-10 -Y

EXPLANATIONS OF CODES USED IN NATURAL HERITAGE REPORTS

FEDERAL STATUS CODES

The following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service categories and their definitions of endangered and threatened plants and animals have been modified from the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (F.R. Vol. 50 No. 188: Vol. 61, No. 40: F R. SO CFR Part 17). Federal Status codes reported for species follow the most recent

listing.

LE Taxa formally listed as endangered.

LT Taxa formally listed as threatened.

PE Taxa already proposed to be formally listed as endangered.

PT Taxa already proposed to be formally listed as threatened.

C Taxa for which the Service currently has on file sufficient Information on biological vulnerability and threat(s) to support proposals to list

them as endangered or threatened species.

S/A Similarity of appearance species.

STATE STATUS CODES

Two animal lists provide state status codes after the Endangered and Nongame Species Conservation Act of 1973 (NSSA 23:2A-1 3 et. seq.): the list of

endangered species (NJ.A.C. 7:25-4.13) and the list defining status of Indigenous, nongame wildlife species of NewJersey (NJ.A.C. 7:25-4.1 7(a)). The status

of animal species Is determined by the Nongame and Endangered Species Program (ENSP). The state status codes and definitions provided reflect the most

recent lists that were revised In the New Jersey Register. Monday. June 3. 1991.

D Declining species-a species which has exhibited a continued decline in population numbers over the years.

E Endangered species-an endangered species is one whose prospects for survival within the state are in immediate danger due to one or

many factors - a loss of habitat, over exploitation, predation, competition, disease. An endangered species requires immediate

assistance or extinction will probably follow.

EX Extirpated specles-a species that formerly occurred in NewJersey, but Is not now known to exist within the state.

I Introduced species-a species not native to New Jersey that could not have established itself here without the assistance of man.

INC Increasing species-a species whose population has exhibited a significant increase, beyond the normal range of its life cycle, over a long

term period.

T Threatened species-a species that may become endangered if conditions surrounding the species begin to or continue to deteriorate.

P Peripheral species-a species whose occurrence in NewJersey is at the extreme edge of its present natural range.

S Stable specles-a species whose population is not undergoing any long-term increase/decrease within its natural cycle.

U Undetermined species-a species about which there is not enough information available to determine the status.

Status for animals separated by a slash(/) indicate a duel status. First status refers to the state breeding population, and the second status refers to the

migratory or winter population.

Plant taxa listed as ehdangered are from NewJersey's official Endangered Plant Species List NJ.S.A. 131 B-I 5.1 51 et seq.

"E Native NewJersey plant species whose survival In the State or nation is In jeopardy.

REGIONAL STATUS CODES FOR PLANTS

LP Indicates taxa listed by the Pinelands Commission as endangered or threatened within their legal Jurisdiction. Not all species currently

tracked by the Pinelands Commission are tracked by the Natural Heritage Program. A complete list of endangered and threatened

Pineland species is Included in the New Jersey Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan.

EXPLANATION OF GLOBAL AND STATE ELEMENT RANKS

The Nature Conservancy has developed a ranking system for use in Identifying elements (rare species and natural communities) of natural diversity most

endangered with extinction. Each element Is ranked according to its global, national, and state (or subnational In other countries) rarity. These ranks are used

to prloritize conservation work so that the most endangered elements receive attention first. Definitions for element ranks are after The Nature Conservancy

(1982: Chapter 4, 4.1-1 through 4.4.1.3-3).

GLOBAL ELEMENT RANKS

G1 Critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity (S or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of

some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction.

G2 Imperiled globally because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it

very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.

G3 Either very rare and local throughout Its range or found locally (even abundantly at some of Its locations) in a restricted range (e.g., a

single western state, a physlographic region in the East) or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extinction throughout It's

range; with the number of occurrences In the range of 21 to 100.

G4 Apparently secure globally; although it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at the periphery.

G5 Demonstrably secure globally; although it may be quite rare In parts of Its range, especially at the periphery. ..

GH Of historical occurrence throughout its range i.e., formerly part of the established biota, with the expectation that It may be rediscovered.

GU Possibly In peril range-wide but status uncertain: more information needed.

GX Believed to be extinct throughout range (e.g , passenger pigeon) with virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered.

GC Species has not yet been ranked.

STATE ELEMENT RANKS

S1 Critically Imperiled in NewJersey because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres). Elements

so ranked are often restricted to very specialized conditions or habitats and/or restricted to an extremely small geographical area of the

state. Also included are elements which were formerly more abundant, but because of habitat destruction or some other critical factor of

its biology, they have been demonstrably reduced in abundance. In essence, these are elements for which, even with intensive searching.

sizable additional occurrences are unlikely to be discovered.

S2 Imperiled In New Jersey because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences). Historically many of these elements may have been more frequent but

are now known from very few extant occurrences, primarily because of habitat destruction. Diligent searching may yield additional

occurrences.

S3 Rare in state with 21 to 100 occurrences (plant species in this category have only 21 to 50 occurrences). includes elements which are

widely distributed in the state but with small populations/acreage or elements with restricted distribution, but locally abundant. Not yet

imperiled in state but may soon be if current trends continue. Searching often yields additional occurrences.

S4 Apparently secure in state, with many occurrences.

55 Demonstrably secure in state and essentially Ineradicable under present conditions.

SA Accidental in state, Including species (usually birds or butterflies) recorded once or twice or only at very great intervals, hundreds or even

thousands of miles outside their usual range; a few of these species may even have bred on the one or two occasions they were recorded;

examples include European strays or western birds on the East Coast and vice-versa.

SE Elements that are clearly exotic in New Jersey including those taxa not native to North America (introduced taxa) or taxa deliberately or accidentally introduced into the State from other parts of North America (adventive taxa). Taxa ranked SE are not a conservation priority

(viable introduced occurrences of GI or G2 elements may be exceptions).

SH Elements of historical occurrence in NewJersey. Despite some searching of historical occurrences and/or potential habitat, no extant occurrences are known. Since not all of the historical occurrences have been field surveyed, and unsearched potential habitat remains,

historically ranked taxa are considered possibly extant, and remain a conservation priority for continued field work.

SP Element has potential to occur in New Jersey, but no occurrences have been reported.

SR Elements reported from NewJersey, but without persuasive documentation which would provide a basis for either accepting or rejecting

the report. In some instances documentation may exist, but as of yet, its source or location has not been determined.

SRF Elements erroneously reported from New Jersey. but this error persists in the literature.

SU Elements believed to be in peril but the degree of rarity uncertain. Also included are rare taxa of uncertain taxonomical standing. More

information is needed to resolve rank.

SX Elements that have been determined or are presumed to be extirpated from NewJersey. All historical occurrences have been searched

and a reasonable search of potential habitat has been completed. Extirpated taxa are not a current conservation priority.

SXC Elements presumed extirpated from NewJersey, but native populations collected from the wild exist in cultivation.

SZ Not of practical conservation concern In NewJersey, because there are no definable occurrences, although the taxon Is native and

appears regularly in the state. An SZ rank will generally be used for long distance migrants whote occurrences during their migrations are too irregular (in terms of repeated visitation to the same locations), transitory, and dispersed to be reliably Identified, mapped and protected. In other words, the migrant regularly passes through the state, but enduring, mappable element occurrences cannot be

defined.

Typically, the SZ rank applies to a non-breeding population (N) in the state - for example, birds on migration. An SZ rank may in a few '..

instances also apply to a breeding population (B), for example certain lepidoptera which regularly die out every year with no significant

return migration.

Although the SZ rank typically applies to migrants. It should not be used indiscriminately. Just because a species is on migration does

not mean It receives an SZ rank: SZwiil only applywhen the migrants occur in an irregular, transitory and dispersed manner.

B Refers to the breeding population of the element In the state.

N Refers to the non-breeding population of the element In the 'state.

T Element ranks containing a "T" indicate that the Infras'pecific taxon Is being ranked differently than the full species. For example Stachys

pa/u1srusvar. homotrcha is ranked 'CST? SH* meaning the full species is gfobally secure but the global rarity of the var. homorricha has

not been determined; in NewJersey the variety Is ranked historic.

"Q Elements containing a "Q" in the global portion of its rank indicates that the taxon is of questionable, or uncertain taxonomical standing.

e.g., some authors regard it as a full species, while oihers treat It at the subspecific level.

.1 Elements documented from a single location.

Note: To express uncertainty, the most likely rank Is assigned and a question mark added (e.g., G2?). A range Is Indiicated by combining two ranks (e.g..

G1G2. SI S3).

IDENTIFICATION CODES

These codes refer to whether the Identification of the species or community has been checked by a reliable Individual and Is Indicative of significant habitat.

Y Identification has been verified and is indicative of significant habitat.

BLANK Identification has not been verified but there Is no reason to believe It is not Indicative of significant habitat.

? Either it has not been determined If the record Is Indicative of significant habitat or the Identification of the species or

community may be confusing or'disputed.

C

)14 SEP 2001

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME COMMON NAME FEDERAL

STATUS

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

CRANK

ACCIPITER COOPERII

AMBYSTOMA TIGRINUM TIGRINUM

AMMODRAMUS HENSLOWII

AMMODRAMUS SAVANNARUM

ARDEA HERODIAS

BUTEO LINEATUS

CALIDRIS CANUTUS

CIRCUS CYANEUS

CISTOTHORUS PLATENSIS

CROTALUS HORRIDUS HORRIDUS

ELAPHE GUTTATA GUTTATA

EUMECES FASCIATUS

FALCO PEREGRINUS

HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS

HYLA ANDERSONII

HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS

IXOBRYCHUS EXILIS

LATERALLUS JAMAICENSIS

MELANERPES ERYTHROCEPHALUS

NOTROPIS CHALYBAEUS

PANDION HALIAETUS

PASSERCULUS SANDWICHENSIS


MELANOLEUCUS

POOECETES GRAMINEUS

STERNA ANTILLARUM

STRIX VARIA

SYNAPTOMYS COOPERI

VIRGINIA VALERIAE VALERIAE

COOPER'S HAWK

EASTERN TIGER SALAMANDER

HENSLOW'S SPARROW

GRASSHOPPER SPARROW

GREAT BLUE HERON

RED-SHOULDERED HAWK

RED KNOT

NORTHERN HARRIER

SEDGE WREN

TIMBER RATTLESNAKE

CORN SNAKE

FIVE-LINED SKINK

PEREGRINE FALCON

BALD EAGLE


COPE'S GRAY TREEFROG

LEAST BITTERN

BLACK RAIL

RED-HEADED WOODPECKER

IRONCOLOR SHINER

OSPREY

SAVANNAH SPARROW

NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

VESPER SPARROW

LEAST TERN

BARRED OWL

SOUTHERN BOG LEMMING

EASTERN SMOOTH EARTH SNAKE

*** Vertebrates

SRANK

LT

T/T

E

E

T/S

S/S

E/T

T

E/U

E

E

E

U

E

E

E

E

D/S

T/T

T/T

T/T

T/T

T

E

E

T/T

U

U

Cs

GSTS

G4

G5

G5

G5

as

G5

G4T4

G5T5

G5

G4

G4

G4

G5

as

G4

G5

G4

as

05

G4T4

G5

G4

G5

as

G5T5

S3B, S4N

S2

SIB

S2B

S2B, S4N

SIB,S2N

S3N

SIB, S3N

SIB

S2

Si

S3

SIB, SIN

SIB, S2N

S3

S2

S3B

S2B

S2B, S2N

SIS2

S2B

S2B, S4N

S3

SIB, S2N

SIB

S3B

S2

SU

!

2

14 SEP 2001

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME COMMON NAME FEDERAL

STATUS

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

GRANK SRANK

*** Ecosystems

BRACKISH TIDAL MARSH COMPLEX

COASTAL PLAIN INTERMITTENT

POND

FRESHWATER TIDAL MARSH

COMPLEX


VERNAL POND

FRESHWATER TIDAL MARSH COMPLEX

*** Invertebrates

ANAX LONGIPES

APAMEA APAMIFORMIS

APAMEA INEBRIATA

BOLORIA'SELENE MYRINA

CALLOPHRYS HENRICI

CALLOPHRYS'HESSELI

CALLOPHRYS IRUS

CATOCALA'CONSORS SORSCONI


CELITHEMIS MARTHA

CELITHEMIS VERNA

CHLOROPTERYX TEPPERARIA

CISTHENE'KENTUCKIENSIS

ENALLAGMA PICTUM

ENALLAGMA RECURVATUM

EUSARCA FUNDARIA

FARONTA RUBRIPENNIS

GOMPHUS APOMYIUS

HEMARIS GRACILIS

HESPERIA ATTALUS SLOSSONAE

HESPERIA LEONARDUS

COMET DARNER

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

A SILVER-BORDERED FRITILLARY

HENRY-'S ELFIN

HESSEL' S HAIRSTREAK

FROSTED ELFIN

THE CONSORT, OR CONSORS

UNDERWING

PRECIOUS UNDERWING

MARTHA'S PENNANT

DOUBLE-RINGED PENNANT

ANGLE WINGED EMERALD MOTH

KENTUCKY 'LICHEN MOTH

SCARLET BLUET

PINE BARRENS BLUET

PINK STREAK

BANNER CLUBTAIL

GRACEFUL CLEARWING

DOTTED SKIPPER

LEONARD'S SKIPPER

G4

G37

G47

S27

$2S3

S37

05

G4 G3G4

G5T5

G5 G3G4

G3

G4T2T4

G4T2T3

G4

G5

G4

G4

G3

G3

G4 G3G4

04

G3G4

G3G4T3

G4

S2S3

S2S4

$2S4

$3S4

S3 54

$2S3

SIS3

$2S3

$3S4

S2

SU

SH

S3

S3

$2S3

S3

$1

SU

S2S3

S2

9

f

N)

14 SEP 2001

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME

** Other types

** Vascular plants

IDAEA OBFUSARIA

IDAEA VIOLACEARIA

LIBELLULA AURIPENNIS

LIBELLULA AXILENA

LIGUMIA NASUTA

LITHOPHANE LEMMERI

LITHOPHANE LEPIDA ADIPEL

LYCAENA HYLLUS

MACROCHILO HYPOCRITALIS

MACROCHILO SANTERIVALIS

MACROCHILO SP 1

MEROPLEON TITAN

METARRANTHIS PILOSARIA

METARRANTHIS SP 1

PAPAIPENA STENOCELIS

PROBLEMA BULENTA

SOMATOCHLORA PROVOCANS

SPEYERIA IDALIA

SYMPETRUM AMBIGUUM

TARACHIDIA SEMIFLAVA

BALD EAGLE WINTERING SITE

MIGRATORY SHOREBIRD

CONCENTRATION SITE

PRIMEVAL FOREST

AESCHYNOMENE VIRGINICA

COMMON NAME STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

RIPPLED WAVE

A GEOMETRID MOTH

GOLDEN-WINGED SKIMMER

BAR-WINGED SKIMMER

EASTERN PONDMUSSEL

LEMMER'S PINION MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

BRONZE COPPER

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

COASTAL BOG METARRANTHIS

A GEOMETRID MOTH

CHAIN FERN BORER MOTH

RARE SKIPPER

TREETOP EMERALD

REGAL FRITILLARY

BLUE-FACED MEADOWHAWK

HALF YELLOW MOTH


MIGRATORY SHOREBIRD

CONCENTRATION SITE

PRIMEVAL FOREST

SENSITIVE JOINT-VETCH LT E

FEDERAL

STATUS

GRANK

0405

G4

G5

G5

G4G5

G3G4

G4T4

G5

04

G3G4

G3

G2G4

G3G4

G3

G4

G2G3

G4

G3

G5

G4

SRANK

$2S4

SIS3

S1S2

S2BS3B,SZ

N

S1

S2

S3S4

S2

S3S4

SIS3

S3

S1

53S4

S2

S3

S2

S2S3

SH

S2

S2S4

S7

S7

S1G3?

LP G2 Si

14 SEP 2001

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME COMMON NAME

AGASTACHE SCROPHULARI IFOLIA

ARETHUSA BULBOSA

ASCLEPIAS RUBRA

ASCLEPIAS VARIEGATA

BIDENS BIDENTOIDES'

BOLTONIA ASTEROIDES VAR

ASTEROIDES I

CALYSTEGIA SPITHAMAEA

CAREX BARRATTI I

CAREX MITCHELLIANA

CAREX TYPHINA

CAREX UTRICULATA.

CHENOPODIUM PRATERI COLA

CHIONANTHUS VIRGINICUS

CLITORIA MARIANA

COREOPSIS ROSEA

CROTON WILLDENOWII

CUSCUTA CORYLI

CUSCUTA POLYGONORUM

CYPERUS ENGELMANNII

CYPERUS POLYSTACHYOS

DESMODIUM LAEVIGATUM

DESMODIUM STRICTUM

DESMODIUM VIRIDIFLORUM


HIRTICAULIS

ELATINE MINIMA

ELEOCHARIS EQUISETOIDES

ELEOCHARI S MELANOCARPA

ELEOCHARIS QUADRANGULATA

FEDERAL

STATUS

PURPLE GIANT-HYSSOP

DRAGON MOUTH

RED MILKWEED

WHITE MILKWEED

ESTUARY BURR-MARIGOLD

ASTER-LIKE BOLTONIA

ERECT BINDWEED

BARRATT'S'SEDGE"

MITCHELL'S SEDGE

CAT-TAIL SEDGE''

BOTTLE-SHAPED SEDGE

NARROW-LEAF GOOSEFOOT

FRINGETREE'

BUTTERFLY-PEA


ELLIPTICAL RUSHFOIL

HAZEL DODDER

SMARTWEED DODDER

ENGELMANN'S FLAT SEDGE

COAST FLAT SEDGE

SMOOTH TICK-TREFOIL


VELVETY TICK-TREEFOIL

HAIRY-STEM WILD YAM

SMALL WATERWORT

KNOTTED SPIKE-RUSH

BLACK-FRUIT SPIKE-RUSH

ANGLED SPIKE-RUSH

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

LP

E

LP

LP

LP

E

LP

E

E

LP

GRANK

G4

G4

G4GS

G5

G3

G5T4T5

G4G5T4T5

G4

G3G4

G5

G5

G5

G5

G5

G3

G5

G5

G5

G4Q

G5T5

G5

G4

G5?

G4GST3Q

G5

G4

G4

G4

SRANK

S2

S2

S2

S2 S2

S2

S4

S2

S3 S2

S2

S3

51

S2

S2

S2

S2

S2

si

S3

S2

S2

S2

S2

Si

Si

S2

9 I)

)5

14 SEP 2001

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME COMMON NAME

ELEOCHARIS TORTILIS

ERIOCAULON PARKERI

ERIOPHORUM TENELLUM

EUPATORIUM CAPILLIFOLIUM


GALACTIA VOLUBILIS

CENTIANA AUTUMNALIS

GENTIANA VILLOSA

GRATIOLA VIRGINIANA

HELONIAS BULLATA

HYPERICUM ADPRESSUM

HYPERICUM GYMNANTHUM

JUNCUS CAESARIENSIS

LESPEDEZA STUEVEI

LOBELIA CANBYI

MALUS ANGUSTIFOLIA VAR

PUBERULA


MYRIOPHYLLUM PINNATUM

MYRIOPHYLLUM VERTICILLATUM

NUPHAR MICROPHYLLUM

NYMPHOIDES CORDATA

ONOSMODIUM VIRGINIANUM

OPHIOGLOSSUM VULGATUM VAR

PYCNOSTICHUM

PANICUM HEMITOMON

PASPALUM DISSECTUM

PENSTEMON LAEVIGATUS

PHORADENDRON LEUCARPUM

PINUS TAEDA

FEDERAL

STATUS

TWISTED SPIKE-RUSH

PARKER'S PIPEWORT

ROUGH COTTON-GRASS

DOG-FENNEL THOROUGHWORT

PINE BARREN BONESET

DOWNY MILK-PEA

PINE BARREN GENTIAN

STRIPED GENTIAN

ROUND-FRUIT HEDGE-HYSSOP

SWAMP-PINK

BARTON'S ST. JOHN'S-WORT

CLASPING-LEAF ST. JOHN'S-WORT

NEW JERSEY RUSH

STUEVE'S DOWNY BUSH-CLOVER

CANBY'S LOBELIA

SPINY WILD CRABAPPLE


CUTLEAF WATER-MILFOIL

WHORLED WATER-MILFOIL

SMALL YELLOW POND-LILY

FLOATINGHEART

VIRGINIA FALSE-CROMWELL

SOUTHERN ADDER'S-TONGUE

MAIDEN-CANE

MUDBANK CROWN GRASS

SMOOTH BEARDTONGUE

AMERICAN MISTLETOE

LOBLOLLY PINE

STATE REGIONAL CRANK

STATUS STATUS

E

E

E

E

E

LT E

E

E

E

E

E

E

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

Cs

G3 Gs

GS

G3

GS

03

G4

05

G3

G2G3

04

C2

G4?

04

GS?T2T4

G3 G5

05

GST4T5

G5

G4

G5

G57

G4?

G5

Gs

G5

SRANK

$1

S2

s5

S2

S2

SH

S3

SX.1

S2

S3

S2

Si

S2

S2

S3

S2

S3

Si

SH

SH

S3

Si

SH

S2

S2

Si

S2

S2

CUMBERLAND COUNTY - ý .. ..



FEDERAL

STATUS

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

GRANK

PLATAN'HERA CILIARIS

POLYGALA INCARNATA

POLYGALA MARIANA

POLYGALA POLYGAMA

POLYGONUM DENS I FLORUM

PRUNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA

PUCCINELLIA FASCICULATA

QUERCUS NIGRA

RHODODENDRON ATLA.NTICUM

RHYNCHOSPORA MICROCEPHALA

RHYNCHOSPORA NITENS


RUELLIA CAROLINIENSIS

SCHIIZAEA PUSILLA

SCHWALBEA AMERICANA

SCIRPUS MARITIMUS

SCLERIA MINOR

SENECIO TOMENTOSUS

SPIRANTHES ODORATA


STYLOSANTHES BI FLORA

UTRICULARIA PURPUREA

VALERIANELLA RADIATA

VERNONIA GLAUCA•

VIOLA BRITTONIANA VAR

BRITTONIANA

YELLOW FRINGED ORCHID

PINK MILKWORT

MARYLAND MILKWORT

RACEMED MILKWORT

DENSE-FLOWER KNOTWEED

CHICKASAW PLUM

SALTMARSH ALKALI GRASS

WATER OAK

DWARF AZALEA

SMALL-HEAD BEAKED-RUSH

SHORT-BEAKED BALD-RUSH

PALE BEAKED-RUSH_.

CAROLINA PETUNIA

CURLY GRASS FERN

CHAFFSEED

SALTMARSH BULRUSH

SLENDER NUT-RUSH

WOOLLY RAGWORT

FRAGRANT LADIES' -TRESSES

HYSSOP HEDGE-NETTLE

PENCIL- FLOWER

PURPLE BLADDERWORT

BEAKED CORNSALAD

BROAD-LEAF IRONWEED

BRITTON'S COAST VIOLET

LP

E

LP"

E

E

E

E

E

LE E

E

LP

LP

LP

LP

E E

G5 $S2-'

GS SH

GS S2

G5 S2

G5 Si

G5T4T5 S2

GU S2

G5 Si S G4G5 Si

GSTS $1'

G47 S2

G3 'S3

G5 SH

G3 S3

G2 $1 G5 SH

G4 S4

G4G5 S2

GS 'S2

G5 S2

G5 S3

G5 S3

G5 $1

G5 Si)

G4G5T4T5 S3


9)

NAME COMMON NAME SRANK

9

1

14 SEP 2001

GLOUCESTER COUNTY



COMMON NAME FEDERAL

STATUS

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

GRANK SRANK

ACCIPITER COOPERII

AMBYSTOMA TIGRINUM TIGRINUM


ARDEA HERODIAS

BARTRAMIA LONGICAUDA

BUTEO LINEATUS

CLEMMYS INSCULPTA

CLEMMYS MUHLENBERGII

FALCO PEREGRINUS


HYLA ANDERSONII


PANDION HALIAETUS


MELANOLEUCUS

POOECETES GRAMINEUS

STRIX VARIA

FRESHWATER TIDAL MARSH

COMPLEX

ALASMIDONTA UNDULATA


CELITHEMIS MARTHA

ENALLAGMA PICTUM

FARONTA RUBRI PENNIS

GOMPHUS APOMYIUS

K'

COOPER'S HAWK

EASTERN TIGER SALAMANDER

HENSLOW'S SPARROW

GREAT BLUE HERON

UPLAND SANDPIPER

RED-SHOULDERED HAWK

WOOD TURTLE

BOG TURTLE

PEREGRINE FALCON

BALD EAGLE


RED-HEADED WOODPECKER

OSPREY

NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

VESPER SPARROW

BARRED OWL


TRIANGLE FLOATER

PRECIOUS UNDERWING

MARTHA'S PENNANT

SCARLET BLUET

PINK STREAK

BANNER CLUBTAIL

NAME

*** Vertebrates

LT

LT

T/T

E

E

S/S

E

E/T

T

E

E

E

E

T/T

T/T

T

E

T/T

GS

G5TS

G4

G5 G5

GS

G4

G3

G4

G4

G4

G5

G5

G4T4

*** Ecosystems

*** Invertebrates

G5

G5

S3B,S4N

S2

SIB

S2B, S4N SIB

SIB,S2N

S3

S2

SIB, S?N

SIB, S2N

S3

S2B, S2N

S2B

S3

SIB,S2N

S3B

S3?

S3

$2S3

S3S4

S3

S3

$1

G4?

G4

G4T2T3

G4

G3

G3G4

G4

k

& C GLOUCESTER COUNTY



COMMON NAME_ FEDERAL

"STATUS

ITAME SP-1I

LAMPSILIS CARIOSA

LAMPSILIS RADIATA

LEPTODEA OCHRACEA


LIGUMIA NASUTA

LITHOPHANE LEMMERI

MACROCHI LO LOUISIANA


MONOLEUCA SEMIFASCIA

NICROPHORUS AMERI CANUS

PYRGUS WYANDOT

ZANCLOGNATHA SP 1


AESCHYNOMENE VIRGINICA

AGASTACHE NEPETOIDES ,

ALOPECURUS CAROLINIANUS

AMIANTHIUM MUSCITOXICUM

ANEMONE CANADENS IS

APLECTRUM HYEMALE

ARISTIDA DICHOTOMA VAR

CURTISSII

ASCLEPIAS RUBRA

ASCLEPIAS VARIEGATA

ASCLEPIAS VERTICILLATA

ASIMINA TRILOBA

A SPANWORM,

YELLOW LAMPMUSSEL

EASTERN LAMPMUSSEL

TIDEWATER MUCKET


EASTERN PONDMUSSEL

LEMMERIS PINION MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A NOCTUID MOTH

"A SLUG MOTH

AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE

SOUTHERN GRIZZLED SKIPPER


SENSITIVE JOINT-VETCH

YELLOW GIANT-HYSSOP

TUFTED MEADOW-POXTAIL

FLY POISON

CANADA ANEMONE

PUTTYROOT ....

CURTISS' THREE-AWN GRASS

RED MILKWEED

WHITE MILKWEED

WHORLED MILKWEED

PAWPAW

LE

LT

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

E

E LP

LP

E

C14 SEP 2001

NAME CRANK

03

G304

G5

Q4 05

0405

0304

C4

03G4

G405

G2G3

G2'

G3G4

Other types

** Vascular plants

SRANK

S3

Si

S3

Si

S1S2

Si

S2

S2S3

SIS3

S2S3

SH

SH

S3

S?

$1

S2

S3S4

S2

SX

Si

S2

S2'

S2

S2

Sl

a?

r2•

05 GS',

Gs5

QST5

0405

G5

G5

3

14 SEP 2001

GLOUCESTER COUNTY



NAME COMMON NAME

ASTER RADULA

BIDENS BIDENTOIDES

BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA

CACALIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA

CALLITRICHE PALUSTRIS

CARDAMINE LONGII

CAREX BARRATTII

CAREX FRANKII

CAREX LIMOSA

CAREX MITCHELLIANA

CAREX POLYMORPHA

CAREX UTRICULATA

CASTANEA PUMILA

CASTILLEJA COCCINEA

CORALLORHIZA WISTERIANA

COREOPSIS ROSEA

CROTON WILLDENOWII

CYPERUS ENGELMANNII

CYPERUS LANCASTRIENSIS


DALIBARDA REPENS


DESMODIUM STRICTUM

DOELLINGERIA INFIRMA

DRABA REPTANS


ELEOCHARIS TORTILIS

ELEPHANTOPUS CAROLINIANUS

ERIOCAULON PARKERI

ERIOPHORUM GRACILE

FEDERAL

STATUS

LOW ROUGH ASTER

ESTUARY BURR- MARIGOLD

SIDE-OATS GRAMA GRASS

PALE INDIAN PLANTAIN

MARSH WATER-STARWORT

LONG'S BITTERCRESS

BARRATTIS SEDGE

FRANK'S SEDGE

MUD SEDGE

MITCHELL'S SEDGE

VARIABLE SEDGE

BOTTLE-SHAPED SEDGE

CHINQUAPIN

SCARLET INDIAN-PAINTBRUSH

SPRING CORALROOT


ELLIPTICAL RUSHFOIL

ENGELMANN'S FLAT SEDGE

LANCASTER FLAT SEDGE

ROUGH FLATSEDGE

ROBIN-RUN-AWAY

SMOOTH TICK-TREFOIL


CORNEL-LEAF ASTER

CAROLINA WHITLOW-GRASS

KNOTTED SPIKE-RUSH

TWISTED SPIKE-RUSH

CAROLINA ELEPHANT-FOOT

PARKER'S PIPEWORT

SLENDER COTTON-GRASS

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

E

E

E

E

E

LP

E

LP

LP

E

E

E

E

E

E

LP

LP

GRANK

G5

G3

G5TS

G4G5

G5

G3

G4

G5

a5

G3G4

G3

G5

G5

G5

G5

G3

as

04Q

a5

G5

G5

G5

G4

a5

GS

G4

05

G5

G3

0ST?

SRANK

51

S2

Si $1 $i

S2

SH

S4

S3

$1 S2

S2

S2

S2 Sx

S2

S2

S2

Si

SH

SH. 1

S3

S2

S2

SH

Si $1

SH

S2

SH

( K

L4 SEP 2001GLOUCESTER COUNTY



NAME

ERIOPHORUM TENELLUM


GLYCERIA LAXA

GYMNOPOGON BREVI FOLIUS

HELONIAS BULLATA

HETERANTHERA MULTIFLORA

LUZULA ACUMINATA

MELANTHIUM VIRGINICUM

MI CRANTHEMUM MICRANTHEMOIDES

MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS


NYMPHOIDES CORDATA

ONOSMODIUM VIRGINIANUM

PANICUM ACICULARE


PHASEOLUS POLYSTACHIOS VAR

POLYSTACHIOS

POLYGALA INCARNATA

POLYGONUM HYDROPI PEROIDES VAR

OPELOUSANUM -', .

PRUNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA

PUCCINELLIA FASCICULATA

PYCNANTHEMUM TORREI

QUERCUS IMBRICARIA"

RHYNCHOSPORA GLOBULARI S

RHYNCHOSPORA INUNDATA

RHYNCHOS PORA PALLIDA

RHYNCHOSPORA SCIRPOIDES

SCHEUCHZERIA PALUSTRI S

SCHIZAEA PUSILLA

COMMON NAME FEDERAL STATUS

ROUGH COTTON-GRASS

PINE BARREN BONESET

NORTHERN MANNA GRASS

SHORT-LEAF SKELETON GRASS

SWAMP-PINK

BOUQUET MUD-PLANTAIN

HAIRY WOOD-RUSH

VIRGINIA BUNCHFLOWER

NUTTALL' S MUDWORT

LONG-AWN SMOKE GRASS


FLOATINCHEART

VIRGINIA FALSE-GROMWELL

BRISTLING PANIC GRASS

SMOOTH BEARDTONGUE

WILD KIDNEY BEAN

PINK MILKWORT

OPELOUSAS WATER-PEPPER

CHICKASAW PLUM

SALTMARSH ALKALI GRASS

TORREY' S MOUNTAIN-MINT

SHINGLE OAK I' -1 '

COARSE GRASS-LIKE BEAKED-RUSH

SLENDER HORNED-RUSH

PALE BEAKED-RUSH

LONG-BEAK BALD-RUSH

ARROW-GRASS

CURLY GRASS FERN

STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS

E E

E

ELT

LP

LP

LP LP

E

8

E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

LP

LP

GRANK

G5 G3

G5

GS

G3

G4

G5T4T5

GH

CST?

G3

G5

G4

G4G5

G5

G4T?

G5 G?Q

G5T4T5 CU

G2

G5 CS? G5? G3G4

G33

G4

G5T5

G3

SRANK

51

S2

$1

$1

S3

S2

S2

SH

Si

S3

S3

Si

$1

Si

S2

SH

S2

S2

S2

$1 Si. $1.1

Si

S2

S3

S2

SH

S3

GLOUCESTER COUNTY



COMMON NAME FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL


SPIRANTHES LACINIATA

SPIRANTHES ODORATA

THASPIUM BARBINODE

TIPULARIA DISCOLOR

UTRICULARIA BIFLORA


VERBENA SIMPLEX

VERNONIA GLAUCA

VULPIA ELLIOTEA

LACE-LIP LADIES'-TRESSES

FRAGRANT LADIES'-TRESSES

HAIRY-JOINT MEADOW-PARSNIP

CRANEFLY ORCHID

TWO-FLOWER BLADDERWORT

BEAKED CORNSALAD

NARROW-LEAF VERVAIN

BROAD-LEAF IRONWEED

SQUIRREL-TAIL SIX-WEEKS GRASS


(

5

14 SEP 2001

NAME GRANK SRANK

E

E

E

E

E

G4G5

G5

G5

G4G5

G5

G5

G5

G5

G5

51

S2

SX

S3

S1

S1

SH

( (

r. Ut"

* °

AMY S;GREENE ENVIRONMENTAL.CONSULTANTS, iNc.

' 18 COMM-ERCE STREET PLAZA FLEMINGTONu, Nj 088=Z "(908) 788-9676 - FAX (908) 788.6788

PA (610) 250-0773

-June 14, 1994

Mt. Sean Hayden TRC Environmental Corporation 5, Waterside Crossing Windsor, 'ZCT 06095

Re: Endangered -and Threatened- Plfhit Species Survey .. and"Stressed Vegetation Suiýey . .. '

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation Superfunid Site Newfield Borough, Gloucester County,' NJ , city: of Vineland, Cumberland County, NJ ,ASGECI Project #1111

Dear Mr. Hayden:

We are pleased to submit'this Endangered and Threatened Plant Species Survey and Stressed Vegetation Survey Report for the above referenced site. The objective of these surveys is , to determine -the presence or absence of the following: species' of. concern: Barratt's sedge (Carex barrattii), - pink tickseed (Coreopsis rosea), Pine. Barren boneset (Eupatoriwu resinosum) and swamp pink (Helonias bullata) .and analysis of the existence of stressed vegetation. -Resnmes of preparers of this report have been included."'

Te 1following sum, a . izes the -findings of the -field investigation and review of existing information for the Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation Superfund Site located in -Newfield Borough, Gloucester County, 'and the City of Vineland," Cumberland County, New Jersey. The field investigation was performed on June 6, 1994.

IE. Intr6duction

The survey was conducted over approximately 100 acres, of which the manufacturing facility occupies approximately 60 acres. 1,1, The northern property, containing the 'facility, is an irregularly shaped parcel located in Newfield Borough' (Figure 1-2). The study area included adjacent wetlands in Newfield and Vineland that are primarily forested' and associated with the fudson Branch (Figure 3-1). The overall

I.

'-7~e

LE•QPP VAC PROPERTY

V1 XRC (CCMNCLLE) AREAS

+ FORMR NEI MUNCPAL

1. FENCED PORTION OF FACIUTY IS A NRC RESWRICIED AREA.

TRC 1 'dw %1'

SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORPORATION NEWFIELD, NEW JERSEY

FIGURE 1-2.

0

XALE IN FEET SITE PLOT F ullý

1 1,

IW SWAM WAIn AND '-5~mon PYYMA 7' AN toAMe KM

:j

CAL

x I

sw..4* t~~ItjRFoERu: u,2 SMDIJ U:WC L~AOSAE PRz~e

0 240 480

nLifrn

II

St.

.1 V.

I - 7ý7

r. UU

-4

topography of the study area consisted of relatively flat to gently sloping terrain.

The study area is located in the Maurice River Watershed within the Delaware Bay Drainage Basin. The wetlands are drained by the Hudson Branch which is tributary to the Burnt Mill Branch of the Miurice River.

SAccording to the State of New Jersey List of Endangered Plant Species and Plant Species of. Concern (N.J.A.C. 7:5C1.1 et seq.), the species of concern have been classified as follows:

o Barratt's sedge - rare (S3) o pink tickseed - imperiled ($2) o Pine Barren boneset - endangered (E) 0 swamp pink - endangered (E)

Additionally, swamp pink is also classified as threatened according to the Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species in New Jersey (50 CPR 17.11 & 17.12, 1990).

Evaluations of- the study area were made as to the suitability of existing habitat for these rare species. The stressed vegetation survey was conducted in order to visually identify evidence of the effects of potential contamination on plant species.

II. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

A habitat evaluation was conducted over the Shield Metallurgy Corporation facility including adjacent wetlands associated with the Hudson Branch. In order to perform the biological survey for the species of concern and stressed vegetation survey, a meander survey was conducted to cover the entire study area. During the field investigation, special attention was given to areas with suitable habitat for the species of concern. The Britton and Brown (1970) plant identification key "An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States and Canada" was used to determine plant species characteristics and to provide habitat information. Other sources to evaluate the habitat onsite included the use of published literature, site maps and topographic maps.

During the course of the investigation items including, but not limited to, chlorosis, stunted growth and abnormal physiological characteristics were used as criteria to evaluate evidence of stressed vegetation.

llJ.1310SURV.o Dc

r. uo

-5

1II. RESULTS OF STUDY

Our findings of* the "biological survey indicate that there were no occurrences of Barratt's sedge, pink tickseed, Pine Barren ýboneset and swJamp piiak within -the. study -area.

'The-stressed vegetation' survey conducted-in conjunction'-, with the - biological[ survey - indicated relatively normal growth -over the study area, although the site has been-, subject to manmade disturbances in the past. .These-'disturbances have led to invasive plant species becoming dominant -in -some portions -of wetland and upland' areas.

The forested - wetlands onsite- supported -dominant canopy_.layier' of red maple '.(Acer. rubrum}), -black -gum (Nyssasylvatica) '.and blacki willow .(Salix nigra)W An often dense, understory growth 'included " -- southern - arrowwood - (Viburnum dentatum), - silky dogwood -(Coanus -momum)-, highbush -blueberry, (Vaccinium corymbosum),, sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolla) ,- elderberry, (Sambucus cahadensis) -and greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia). '-The- herbaceous' ilayer consisted- of an abundance of cinnamon fern (Osmunda 'ciunamomea) ;: tussock sedge, (Carex stricta) -r and -sp6tted jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) .. • Scrub/shrub wetlands also observed onsite were generally overgrown "-with- similar , understory species including -fetterbush _(Leuc6thoe -racemusa). , _ .

"E-mergent wetlands 'located on the • facility site,, within a ;wastewater -detention pond, azd assodiated' with' the 'Hudson Bran ch' :contained a' dominance -ofý spike rush- (Eleocharis-. spp.),; -bog "rush (Juncus pelocarpus ), -common' rush,: three square- (Scirpus americanus),, whitened sedge- (Carex albolutescens) ý Canada -'rush _(Juncus -canadensis) ," slender rush (Juncus tenuis),, common reedgrass (Phragmites australis), tussock sedge (Carex stricta), pointed broom sedge "'(CCarex' 'coparia ) , ;-sallow sedge (Carex -lurida), larger water-starwcvrt'-- (Callitriche'- --heterophylla) ' -:and- <.spotted

Forested upland - areas throughout the study area contained a dominant canopy layer of southern red oak (Querczzs -falcata)," scarlet- oak (Quercus coccinea)' 'white oak (Quercus alba), 'red '-maple, blabk 'locust (Robinia .,

psuedoa'cacia ), mockernut' (Carya -t6dmentosa)' -and sand. -hickory' (Carya ,pallida) The -understory was'-supported .by -similar species in the sapling -layer and -the'-dominant vegetation in the-" shrub- layer- consisted ''of -black'. huckleberry. (Gaylussaaia. baccata)', -' dangleberry (Gaylussacia -. frondosa) , - lowbush blueberry '(Vaccinium vacillans)," mountain laurel, (Xalmia

Slatifolia) ,-.sheep laurel (Kalmia angu tifotia),. multiflora

1111BItOSV.DOC

rose (Rosa multiflora), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera Japonica).

The forested areas in the study area appeared to be secondary growth, not mature, which have undergone disturbances in the past. Based on professional judgement, the trees appeared to be the proper height for their age. Other vegetation did not show signs of stunted growth or chlorosis.

The biological survey for Barratt's sedge revealed no findings of this rare species within the study area. Habitat requirements are open, undisturbed, emergent wetlands; not usually occurring in standing water. This habitat was not found due to the sites' disturbed nature. "*Barratt's sedge is commonly associated with Pineland swamps and bogs, blooming and fruiting from late April to July.

No species of pink tickseed were found over the study area. Pink tickseed habitat requirements are vernal ponds (i.e., shallow, isolated ponds not fed by a spring or stream) or open, emergent wetland areas which are ponded for most of the year and dry up in the summer. The biological survey for this species was conducted at a time of year when sufficient growth for identification may not be present. Pink tickseed flowers from July through late September. The only potential habitat identified within the study area was on the facility site within the wastewater detention basin (reference Figure 1-2). This area was observed to contain emergent wetland species and ponding. An additional site visit later in the growing season may be warranted in order to definitively assess the presence or absence of pink tickseed.

Pine Barren boneset was not identified within the study area limits. Habitat for this species of concern is open, undisturbed, emergent wetland communities and streamsides; located mostly in the Pine Barrens. Flowering of this species occurs from early July to October.

The biological survey for swamp pink was conducted at a time of the year when it would be in flower; the evergreen leaves, which grow in a basal rosette, are* also readily identifiable. No swamp pink populations were found. The. habitat type that supports swamp pink consists of deciduous, .

forested wetland communities and stands of Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides). The forested wetland areas onsite would not provide habitat for swamp pink due to their disturbed nature and lack of Atlantic white cedar occurrences. Additionally, dense scrub/shnub wetland areas

111XBZO�gXV.DoC

%v .... .. n vu sU• P. 08

-7

provided inadequate sunlight and increased competition among plant species thereby creating poor habitat for swamp pink.

IV. conclusion

In summary, habitats specific to the species of concern (Barratt's sedge, pink tickseed, Pine Barren boneset and swamp pink) were thoroughly searched and 'no specimens were identified as a result of our detailed biological survey. No suitable habitat was found onsite for Barratt's sedge, Pine Barren boneset and swamp pink. However, based on the field survey, the facility portion of the study area may contain potentially suitable habitat within the wastewater detention basin (emergent wetland) to support pink tickseed; "althoug" -no in-dividuals- were identified during- the site investigation.

No evidence of stressed vegetation within the wetland and upland communities was observed during the meander survey.

If you have any questions or comments concerning this submission please contact me.

Sincerely, AMY S. GREENE ENVIRONMENTAL, CONSULTANTS, INC.

Thomas S. Brodde Project Manager

enc.

111IOv.WOC

APPENDIX B-2

ENDANGERED SPECIES DATA BASE SEARCH

,New Jersey Natural Heritage Database

Letter From NJDEP DatedMarch.29,-1996 ..

wj

Christine Todd Whitman Governor

0 Start of ýNrfr 2Jierseq

Department of Environmental Protection DMsion of Parks and Forestry

Office of Natural Lands Management Natural Heritage Program

CN404 Trenton, NJ 08625-0404

Tel. #609-984-1339 Fax. #609-984-1427

Robert C. Shinn, Jr. Commissioner

March 29, 1996

Sean Hayden TRC Environmental Corporation 5 Waterside Crossing Windsor, CT 06095

Re: Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation (TRC Project No. 19080-0070-00020)

Dear Mr. Hayden:

Thank you for your data request regarding rare species information for the above referenced project site in Gloucester and Cumberland Counties.

The Natural Heritage Data Base has records for occurrences of Eupatorium resinosum and Polygala polygamna in the immediate vicinity of the site. The attached list provides more information about these occurrences. Also attached are lists of rare species and natural communities which have been documented from Gloucester and Cumberland Counties. If suitable habitat is present at the project site, these species have potential to be present. If you have questions concerning the wildlife records or wildlife species mentioned in this response, we recommend you contact the Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program.

PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED 'CAUTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON NHP DATA'.

Thank you for consulting the Natural Heritage Program. The attached invoice details the payment due for processing this data request. Feel free to contact us again regarding any future data requests.

Sincerely,

Thomas F. Breden Supervisor

cc: Lawrence Niles Thomas Hampton NHP File No. 96-3907551

New Jersey is an Equal Opporturuty Employer

Recycled Paper

C28 MAR 1996

,ON OR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF PROJECT SITE RARE SPECIES AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES PRESENTLY RECORDED IN


COMMON NAME FEDERAL STATE

STATUS STATUS

REGIONAL GRANK

STATUSSRANK DATE OBSERVED IDENT.

Vascular plants

"UPATORIUM RESINOSUM,

-OLYGALA POLYGAMA

Records Processed

PINE BARREN BONESET

RACEMED MILKWORT

C2 E LP G3 S2 1937-09-26 Y WITHIN-1 MI. SSE OF PLEASANTVILLE, BURNT MIL BRANCH.

G5 S2 1992-08-04 Y POWER LINE ROW NORTH OF SSUBSTATION, CA. 0.3 MILES NORTH OF BURNT MILL BRANCH, NORTH VINELAND.

(

LOCAT ION

EXPLANATIONS OF CODES USED IN NATURAL HERITAGE REPORTS

FEDERAL STATUS CODES

The following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service categories and their definitions of endangered and

threatened plants and animals have been modified from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (F.R. Vol. 50

No. 188; Vol. 55, No. 35; F.R. 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12). Federal Status codes reported for species

follow the most recent listing.

LE Taxa formally listed as endangered.

LT Taxa formally listed as threatened.

PE Taxa already proposed to be formally listed as endangered.

PT Taxa already proposed to be formally listed as threatened.

C1 Taxa for which the Service currently has on file substantial information on biological

vulnerability and threat(s) to support the appropriateness of proposing to list them as

endangered or threatened species.

C1 Taxa which may be possibly extinct (although persuasive documentation of extinction has

not been made--compare to 3A status).

C2 Taxa for which information now in possession of the Service indicates that proposing to

list them as endangered or threatened species is possibly appropriate, but for which

substantial data on biological vulnerability and threat(s) are not currently known or on file

to support the immediate preparation of rules.

C3 Taxa that are no longer being considered for listing as threatened or endangered

species. Such taxa are further coded to indicate three subcategories, depending on the

reason(s) for removal from consideration.

3A Taxa for which the Service has persuasive evidence of extinction.

3B Names that, on the basis of current taxonomic understanding, do not represent taxa

meeting the Act's definition of "species".

3C Taxa that have proven to be more abundant or widespread than was previously believed

Natural Heritage Report Codes I ge 2

and/or those that are not subject to any identifiable threat.

SIA Similarity of appearance species.

STATE STATUS CODES

Two animal lists provide state status codes after the Endahgered and Nongame Species Conservation

Act of 1973 (NSSA"23:2A-13 et. seq.): the list of endangered species (N.J.A.C.7:25-4.13) and the

list defining status of indigenous, nongame wildlife species of New Jersey (N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.17(a)).

The status of animal species is determined by the Nongame and Endangered Species Program (ENSP).

The state status codes 'and definitions provided reflect the most recent lists that were revised in the

New Jersey Register, Monday, June 3, 1991.

D Declining species-a species which:has exhibited a continueld decline in population

numbers over the years.

E Endangered species-an endangered species is one whose prospects.for survival within the

state are in immediate danger due to one or many factors - a loss of habitat, over

" exploitation, predation; competition, disease.- An endangered species requires immediate

-assistance or'extirction will probably follow.

"EX Extirpated species-a species that formerly occurred in New Jersey,.but is not now known

to exist within the state.

I Introduced species-a species not native to New. Jersey that could not have established

itself here without the assistance of man: 7- . ...

INC' Increasing spkciei-a' species whose population ýhas exhibited a'significant increase,

beyond the normal'ran'ge 'of its life cycle;,over a long term:period:--.

- -T Threatened species-a species-that may become endangered if conditions surrounding the S.. ... species begin 6:&r c'6ntinue to-deteriorate. - ,

P Peripheral species-a species whose occurrence in New Jersey is at the extreme edge of

its present natural range.

Natural Heritage Report Codes Page 3

S Stable species-a species whose population is not undergoing any long-term

increase/decrease within its natural cycle.

U Undetermined species-a species about which there is not enough information available to

determine the status.

Status for animals separated by a slash(/) indicate a duel status. First status refers to the state

breeding population, and the second status refers to the migratory or winter population.

Plant taxa listed as endangered are from New Jersey's official Endangered Plant Species List N.J.S.A.

131B-15.151 et seq.

E Native New Jersey plant species whose survival in the State or nation is in jeopardy.

REGIONAL STATUS CODES FOR-PLANTS

LP Indicates taxa listed by the Pinelands Commission as endangered or threatened within

their legal jurisdiction. Not all species currently tracked by the Pinelands Commission are

tracked by the Natural Heritage Program. A complete list of endangered and threatened

Pineland species is included in the New Jersey Pinelands Comprehensive Management

Plan.

EXPLANATION OF GLOBAL AND STATE ELEMENT RANKS

The Nature Conservancy has developed a ranking system for use in identifying elements (rare species

and natural communities) of natural diversity most endangered with extinction. Each element is ranked

according to its global, national, and state (or subnational in other countries) rarity. These ranks are

used to prioritize conservation work so that the most endangered elements receive attention first.

Definitions for element ranks are after The Nature Conservancy (1982: Chapter 4, 4.1-1 through

4.4.1.3-3).

"Natural Heritage Report Codes le 4

GLOBAL ELEMENT RANKS

GI Critically imperiled glob'ally because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences or very few

- - remaining' individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially

. vulnerable to extinction. ,

G2 Imperiled globally because 6f rarity, (6 ,to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or

acres) 6r because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extinction throughout its rang. e.

G3 Either v'ery rare and local throughout its range or found locally (even abundantly at some

"- of'its locations) in a restricted range (e.g., a single western state, a physiographic region

Winthe East) or'because of other factors making it vulnerable, to extinction ,throughout it's

ranege; with the numbe'rof 'occurrences in the range of 21 to -100.

G4 Apparently secure globally; although it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially

at the periphery.

G5 Demonstrably secure globally; although it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especia

lly at-the periphery.'

GH Of historical occurrence throughout its range i.e., formerly "part of the established biota,

with'the 'expectation that it may be rediscovered.

GU Possibly-in'peril range-wide but status uncertain; more information needed.

GX Believed to be extinct throughout range (e.g., passenger pigeon) with virtually no

- 'likelihood that it will'be'rediscovered. ' " ' . .

G? Species has'not yet been ranked. L',

STATE ELEMENT RANKS

S1 Critically imperiled in New Jersey because of extreme rarity-(5 or fewer.occurrences or Svery

few rem aining individuals or acres).- Elem ents so ranked-are often restricted to very

specialized conditions or habitats and/or restricted to an extremely small geographical


area of the state. Also included are elements which were formerly more abundant, but

because of habitat destruction or some other critical factor of its biology, they have been

demonstrably reduced in abundance. In essence, these are elements for which, even

with intensive searching, sizable additional occurrences are unlikely to be discovered.

S2 imperiled in New Jersey because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences). Historically many of

these elements may have been more .frequent but are now known from very few extant

occurrences, primarily because of habitat destruction. Diligent searching may yield

additional occurrences.

S3 Rare in state with 21 to 100 occurrences (plant species in this category have only 21 to

50 occurrences). Includes elements which are widely distributed in the state but with

small populations/acreage or elements with restricted distribution, but.locally abundant.

Not yet imperiled in state but may soon be if current trends continue. Searching often

yields additiofial occurrences.

S4 Apparently secure in state, with many occurrences.

S5 Demonstrably secure in state and essentially ineradicable under present conditions.

SA Accidental in state, including species (usually birds or butterflies) recorded once or twice

or only at very great intervals, hundreds or even thousands of miles outside their usual

range; a few of these species may even have bred on the one or two occasions they

were recorded; examples 'include european strays or western birds on the East Coast and

visa-versa.

SE Elements that are clearly exotic in New Jersey including those taxa not native to North

America (introduced taxa) or taxa deliberately or accidentally introduced into the State

from other parts of North America (adventive taxa). Taxa ranked SE are not a

conservation priority (viable introduced occurrences of G1 or G2 elements may be

exceptions).

SH Elements of historical occurrence in New Jersey. Despite-some searching of historical

occurrences and/or potential habitat, no extant occurrences are known. Since not all of

the historical occurrences have been field surveyed, and unsearched potential habitat

remains, historically ranked taxa are considered possibly extant, and remain a

conservation priority for continued field work.

Natural Heritage Report Codes 'ge 6

SN Regularly occurring, usually migratory and typically nonbreeding species for which no

significant or effective habitat conservation measures can be taken in the -state; this

category includes migratory birds, bats, sea turtles, and cetaceans which do not breed in

the state but pass through twice a year or may remain in the winter (or, in a few cases,

the summer); included also 'are certain lepido'ptera which regularly nmigrate to-a -state

where they reproduce, but then completely die out every year with no return migration.

Species in this category are so widely and unreliably distributed during migration or in

winter that no small set of sites could be set aside with the hope of significantly*

furthering their conservation. Other nonbreeding, high globally-ranked, species (such as

-the bald eagle; whooping crane or some seal species) which regularly spe nd some portion

of the year at definite localities (and therefore have a valid conservation need in the

state) are not ranked SN but rather $1, .2, etc.

SR Elements reported from New Jersey, but without persuasive documentation which would

provide abasis for either accepting-or rejecting the report. In some instances

documentation may exist, but as of yet, its source or location has not been determined.

SRF Elements erroneously reported frorm NewJersey, but this error. perists in the literature.

SU Elements believed to be in peril but the degree of rarity uncertain. Also included are rare

taxa of uncertain taxonomical standing. More information is needed to resolve rank.

SX Elements that have been determined or are presumed to b e extirpated from New Jersey.

All historical occurrences have been searched and a reasonable search of potential habitat

has been completed. Extirpated taxa are not a current conservation priority.

SXC Elements presumed extirpated from New Jersey, but native populations collected from

the wild exist in cultivatiori.

T Element ranks containing a "T" indicate that the infraspecific taxon is being ranked

differently than the full species. For example Stachys palustris var. homotricha is ranked

"G5T? SH" meaning the full species is globally secure but the global rarity of the var.

homotricha has not been determined; in New Jersey the variety is ranked historic.

Q Elements containing a "Q" in the global portion of its rank indicates that the taxon is of

questionable, or uncertain taxonomical standing, e.g., some authors regard it as a full

species, while others treat it at the subspecific level.

A


.1 Elements documented from a single location.

Note: To express uncertainty, the most likely rank is assigned and a question mark added (e.g., G2?). A range is indicated by combining two ranks (e.g., G1G2, $1S3).

IDENTIFICATION CODES

These codes refer to whether the identification of the species or community has been checked by a reliable individual and is indicative of significant habitat.

Y Identification has been verified and is indicative of significant habitat.

BLANK Identification has not been verified but there is no reason to believe it is not indicative of significant habitat.

Either it has not been determined if the record is indicative.of significant habitat o "the identification of the species or community may be confusing or disputed.

ftvi•€ SeptI•Solt 91

Q C CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAMEk :'

ACCIPITER COOPERII

'AMBYSTOMA TIGRINUM TIGRINUM


AMMODRAMUS SAVANNARUM'

'ARDEA HERODIAS

BUTEO LINEATUS

CIRCUS CYANEUS,

CISTOTHORUS PLATENSIS

CROTALUS HORRIDUS HORRIDUS

ELAPHE GUTTATA' -,

FALCa PEREGRINUS


HYLA ANDERSONII,

HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS


PANDION*HALIAETUS t

PASSERCULUS SANDWICHENSIS

PITUOPHIS MELANOLEUCUS,,

MELANOLEUCUS

POOECETES GRAMINEUS

STERNA ANTILLARUM

STRIX VARIA.

SYNAPTOMYS COOPERI


COASTAL PLAIN INTERMITTENT

POND


COMMON NAME,

COOPER'S HAWK

EASTERN, TIGER SALAMANDER

HENSLOW'S, SPARROW

GRASSHOPPER SPARROW

GREAT, BLUE HERON

RED-SHOULDERED HAWK

NORTHERN HARRIER SEDGE WREN

T'IMBER RATTLESNAKE CORN SNAKE,

PEREGRINE FALCON

BALD EAGLE


COPE'S GRAY TREEFROG

"RED-HEADED WOODPECKER

OSPREY,

SAVANNAH SPARROW

NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL STATUS STATUS * STATUS

C2

E/SA LELTNL 3C

C2

VESPER. SPARROW

LEASTTERN BARRED OWL.,

SOUTHERN BOG LEMMING

E E E T/T

T/S E/T E/U E E E E E E E T/T T/T T/T T

E -E

T/T

U

GRANK

G4 G5T5

G4 G5

G5

G5

G5

G5

G5T5Q

G5 G4

G4

G4

G5

G5

G5

G5

G5T4

G5•

G5

G5

BRACKISH TIDAL MARSH COMPLEX G4

VERNAL POND G37

FRESHWATER TIDAL MARSH COMPLEX G4?

SRANK

S2

S2

S2

S2

S2

SI' s2,

Si Si Si

S3

S2

S3 s3 S2

S3

S2, S2 S3 S2

S2S3

S37

I I . I i

C,I JUN 1995

'* Vertebrates

* Ecosystems

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL STATUS STATUS STATUS

GRANK

** Invertebrates

ANAX LONGIPES

APAMEA APAMIFORMIS

APAMEA INEBRIATA

BOLORIA SELENE MYRINA

CATOCALA CONSORS SORSCONI


CELITHEMIS MARTHA

CELITHEMIS VERNA

CHLOROPTERYX TEPPERARIA

CISTHENE PLUMBEA

ENALLAGMA PICTUM

ENALLAGMA RECURVATUM

EUSARCA FUNDARIA

IDAEA OBFUSARIA

IDAEA VIOLACEARIA

INCISALIA IRUS


LIBELLULA AXILENA

LIGUMIA NASUTA

LITHOPHANE LEMMERI

LITHOPHANE LEPIDA ADIPEL

LYCAENA HYLLUS

MACROCHILO HYPOCRITALIS


MACROCHILO SP 1

MEROPLEON TITAN

MITOURA HESSELI.

PAPAIPEMA STENOCELIS

COMET DARNER A NOCTUID MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

A SILVER-BORDERED FRITILLARY

THE CONSORT, OR CONSORS,

UNDERWING

A PRECIOUS UNDERWING

MARTHAIS PENNANT

DOUBLE-RINGED PENNANT.

ANGLE WINGED EMERALD MOTH

LEAD-COLORED LICHEN MOTH

SCARLET BLUET

PINE BARRENS BLUET

RIPPLED WAVE

A GEOMETRID MOTH

FROSTED ELFIN


BAR-WINGED SKIMMER

EASTERN PONDMUSSEL

LEMMERIS PINION MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

BRONZE COPPER

A NOCTUID MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

A NOCTUID MOTH

HESSEL'S HAIRSTREAK

CHAIN FERN BORER MOTH

/

0 JUN 1995


C2

3C

3C

3C

G5 G4 G3G4 G5T5 G4TU

G4T2T3 G4 G5 G4 G5 G4 G3 G4 G4G5 G4 G4

G5 G5 G4 G3G4 G4T3T4 G5 G4 GU G3Q G2G4 G3G4 G4

S2? SU S2S4 S2S4 SlS3

S2S3 S3S4 S17 SU S3 S3? S3 S2S3 S2S4 SlS3 SU Si? Si? Sl S2

S3S4

Si?

S2S3 S1S3

S3 Si

S3S4

S3

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



( K

NAME

PROBLEHA BULENTA' .

SOMATOCHLORA' PROVOCANS

SYMPETRUM kA8BI•GUM

'* Other types


MIGRATORY SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIO'$SITE

PRIMEVAL' FOREST

Vascutar ptants

AESCHYNOMENE"VI`RGiNICA AGASTACHE SCROPHULARIIFOLIA

AREiHUSAiULBOSA ASCLEPI ASiUR

ASCLEP!AS VARiEGATA

BIDENS BIDENTdIDES. BOLTONIA`ASTEROIDES VAR

GLASTIFbLIA CALYSTEGIA SPITHAMAEA

.CAREX BARRATT'i'I CAREX MITCHELLIANA

CAREX ROSTRATA CAREX TYPHINA CLITORIA MARIANA

COREOPSIS ROSEA CRATAEGUS RUBELLA

CUSCUTA CORYLI

CUSCUTA POLYGONORUM

CYPERUS ENGELMANNII

dOMMON NAME ,

,'THE RARE'SKIPPER

TREETOP EMERALD' "

SBLUE-FACED MEADOUFLY

BALD EAGLE WINTERING SItE

MIGRATORYt SHOREBIRD

CONCENTRATION SITE

PRIMEVAL FOREST

','SENSITIVE JOINT-VETCH

PURPLEGIANT HYSSOP

DRAGON MOUTH :

RED MILKWEED"

WHITE M4ILKWEED

, BUR-MARIGOLD

BOLTONIA

ERECT BINDWEED

BARRATTIS SEDGE:..

•MITCHELL'S.SEDGE

BEAKED SEDGE

CAT-TAIL' SEDGE

BUTTERFLY PEA

PINK TICKSEED .

REDIS' H-AQTHORN

HAZEL DODDER

SMARTWEED DODDER

ENGELMANN'S FLATSEDGE

FEDERAL

STATUSSTATE REGIONAL STATUS STATUS

C2

GRANK

G2G3 G3G4

G5

G? G?

SG3?

LT

C2.

3C

E

E E

E

LP G2 G4

G4.

LP 'G4G5

G5

G3

G5T?

LP

E

LP

G4G5 G4 /

G3G4

G5 G5 G5 G3 G?Q G5 G5

GO0

3 JUN 1995

SRANK

"Sz S2S4

S1?

Si

Sl S2

",S2 S2

" SZ2 S2 Si

Si

S4 S2 S2

SS2 Si "S2 Si' SZ

s2" S2

JUN 1995 CUMBERLAND COUNTY



NAME

CYPERUS POLYSTACHYOS


DESMOOIUM STRICTUM

DESMODIUM VIRIDIFLORUM


HIRTICAULIS


ELEOCHARIS MELANOCARPA

ELEOCHARIS QUADRANGULATA

ELEOCHARIS TORTILIS

ERIOCAULON PARKERI

ERIOPHORUM TENELLUM

EUPATORIVM RESINOSUM

GALACTIA VOLUBILIS

GENTIANA AUTUMNALIS

GENTIANA VILLOSA

HELONIAS BULLATA

HYPERICUM GYMNANTHUM

JUNCUS CAESARIENSIS

LESPEDEZA STUEVEI


MYRIOPHYLLUM PINNATUM

MYRIOPHYLLUM VERTICILLATUM

NUP HAR MICROPHYLLUM

ONOSMOQIUM VIRGINIANUM

OPHIOGLOSSUM VULGATUM VAR

PYCNOSTICHUM

PASPALUM DISSECTUM


COMMON NAME

COAST FLATSEDGE SMOOTH TICK-TREFOIL


VELVETY TICK-TREFOIL

HAIRY-STEMMED WILD YAM

KNOTTED SPIKERUSH

BLACK-FRUITED SPIKERUSH

ANGLED SPIKERUSH

TWISTED SPIKERUSH

PARKER'S PIPEWORT

ROUGH COTTONGRASS

PINE BARREN BONESET

DOWNY MILK-PEA

PINE BARREN GENTIAN

STRIPED GENTIAN

SWAMP-PINK

CLASPING-LEAVED ST.

JOHNOS-WORT

NEW JERSEY RUSH

TALL BUSH-CLOVER


CUT-LEAVED WATER-MILFOIL

WHORLED WATER-MILFOIL

SMALL YELLOW POND LILY


SHEATHED ADDER'S-TONGUE

MUDBANK PASPALUM

SMOOTH BEARD TONGUE

FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL STATUS STATUS STATUS

LP

E E

E

LP

3C

C2

3C

LT

C2

3C

E E E

E

E

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP

E E E E E

E

GRANK

G5 G5

G4

G57

G5T3Q

G4 04

0 4

05

03

05

03

G5

G3

G4

G3

G4

G0

G4?

G3

G5

G5

G5

G4

G5TU

G4?

G5

SRANK

Sl S3 S2 S2 SU

SH Si

S2 Si S2

Si

S2 SH S3

Sx.1 S3 S2

S2 s2 s3

SH SH

SH Si

SH

S2 Si

(/C

(75 30 JUN 1995

NAME"

' PHORADENDRON SEROTINUM

'PINUS TAEDA

PLATANTHERA CILIARIS

POLYGALA INCARRATA

POLYGALA POLYGAMA

POLYGONUM DENSIFLORUM

'PRUNUS'ANGUSTIFOLIA

PYRUS ANGUSTIFOLIA

QUERCUS NIGRA

RHODODENDRON ATLANTICUM

RHYNCHOSPORA MICROCEPHALA

" RHYNCHOSPORA NITENS

"- RHYNCHOSPORA PALLIDA

RUELLIA CAROLINIENSIS ,SCHIZAEA PUSILLA

SCHWALBEA'AMERICANA

SCIRPUS'MARITIMUS

SCLERIA'MINOR

SPIRANTHES ODORATA


STYLOSANTHES BIFLORA

VERNONIA'GLAUCA


COMMON NAME

MISTLETOE

LOBLOLLY PINE

YELLOW- FRINGED ORCHID'

PINK MILKWORT

RACEMED MILKUORT

STOUT SMARTWEED

CHICKASAW PLUM

NARROW-LEAVED WILD' CRABAPPLE

WATER OAK

DWARF AZALEA

SMALL-HEADED BEAKED RUSH

SHORT-BEAKED BALDRUSH

PALE BEAK RUSH

CAROLINA PETUNIA

CURLY GRASS FERN

CHAFFSEED,

SALT MARSH BULRUSH

SLENDER NUT RUSH

FRAGRANT LADIES'-TRESSES

AHYSSOP, HEDGE-NETTLE PENCIL FLOWER

BROAD-LEAVED IRONWEED

FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL GRANK


LP

LP

E

E E

"E E E

E

E3C SLEE E

LP LP

LP

E

G5 G5 G5

A G5

G5 G5 G5.

G5? G5 G4G5

G? G4

G3

SG5 G3

G2 C G 5

G4 G5 G5 GS

"A G5

CUMBERLAND COUNTY



SRANK

S2 S2

S2 " SH

S2 Si

Si S2

Sl

Si Sl 5• 1

S2 S3

A SH A S3

Si SH

S4 S2

s2

S3 Si

4 *

GLOUCESTER COUNTY



FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL

STATUS STATUS STATUSGRANK

"VertebratesAMBYSTOMA TIGRINUM TIGRINUM

AMMOORAMUS HENSLOWII

ARDEA HERODIAS

BARTRAMIA LONGICAUDA

BUTEO LINEATUS

CLEMMYS INSCULPTA

CLEMMYS MUHLENBERGII

FALCO PEREGRINUS


HYLA ANDERSONII


MELANOLEUCUS

POOECETES GRAMINEUS

STRIX VARIA


EASTERN TIGER SALAMANDER HENSLOW'S SPARROW

GREAT BLUE HERON

UPLAND SANDPIPER

RED-SHOULDERED HAWK

WOOD TURTLE

BOG TURTLE

PEREGRINE FALCON

BALD EAGLE


NORTHERN PINE SNAKE

VESPER SPARROW

BARRED OWL


C2

C2 E/SA LELTNL 3C C2

E E. T/S E E/T T E E E E T

G5T5 G4 G5 G5 G5 G4 G3 G4 G4 G4 G5T4

G5 G5TE

T/T

S2 Sl S2 S1 S2 S3 S2 Si

S1

S3 S3

S2 S3

Invertebrates ALASMIDONTA UNDULATA


CELITHEMIS MARTHA

ENALLAGMA PICTUM

LAMPSILIS CARIOSA

LAMPSILIS RADIATA

LEPTODEA OCHRACEA

LIBELLULA AURIPENNIS.

LIGUMIA NASUTA

NICROPHORUS AMERICANUS

TRIANGLE FLOATER A PRECLOUS UNDERWING

MARTHAIS PENNANT

SCARLET BLUET'

YELLOW LAMPMUSSEL

EASTERN LAMPMUSSEL

TIDEWATER MUCKET


EASTERN PONDMUSSEL

AMERICAN BURVING BEETLE

(

JUN 1995


I Ecosystems G4? S3?

C2

C2

G4 G4T2T3 G4 G4

G4 G5 G4

G5 G4 G1

S3 S2S3 S3S4 S3?

S1 S3 SI S1? Si SN

LE E

K (

V

I

- GLOUCESTER COUNTY.



** Other types

** Vascutar pta

NAMEFEDERAL STATE REGIONAL

-STATUS STATUS STATUS

GRANK SRANK

G7 1S7

G? : S?

LT E

BALD EAGLE UWNTERING SITE

nts ",AESCHYN6•M•N VIRGINICA

AGASTACHE NEkETOIDES

AMIANTHIUM MUSCITOXI.CUM ANEMONE CANADENSIS"

APLECTRUMHYEI4ALE

iARISTI1DA BASIRAMEA VAR

CURTISSII' ..

ASCLEPiAd RUBRAfk I' " ASCLEPIAS VARIEGATA

"ASCLEPIAS VERTICI LLATA

' ASIMINA TRILOBA

ASTER INF.IRMUS

ASTER RADULA

BIDENS BIDENTOIDES

BOU[TELOUA CURTIPENDULA

t tACALIA' ATRIPLICIFOLIA

CALLITRICHENVERNA

"CARDAMINE LONGI.

CAREX BARRATTII

CAREX FRA4KII *.

CAREX LIMOSA

CAREX MITCHELLIANA

CAREX POLYMORPHA.

CAREX ROSTRATA

CASTANEA PUMILA

CASTILLEJA COCCINEA"

J',COMMON NAME

'BALD EAGLE WINTERING SITE

,,SENSITIVE JOINT-VETCH

YELLOW GIANT HYSSOP

FLY POISON ,

CANADAkANEMONE

PUTTYROOT," ý

CURTIS' THREE-AWNED. GRASS

'RED MILKWEED

WHITE MI.LKWEED

,,,WHORLED MILKWEED

PAWPAU • ý , :

CORNEL-LEAVED ASTER"

LOW ROUGH ASTER

BUR-MARIGOLD

SIDE-OATS GRAMMA GRASS

PALE INDIAN PLANTAIN

SPRING WATER STARWORT

LONG'S BITTER CRESS

BARRATT'S SEDGE

1 FRANK'S SEDGE..

MUD SEDGE.

MITCHELL'S SEDGE

V VARIABLE SEDGE

BEAKED SEDGE.

ALLEGHENY CHINQUAPIN ,

"SCARLET INDIAN PAINTBRUSH.

LP GZ G5

G4G5

G5 G5 •5T4T5

LP G4G5

G5

G5 G5

G5

G3

G5

0,405 "G5

LP *G4

.G. G5

G3G4 G2G3

G5 G5 G5

,SZ 1S2 SX

ISl

-S2

S2

S 2 Is2

'Si

ISi

ISZ "s2

I S

.S1 'iS1

,S2 SH

'•S4

S2

,S1 S2 -SI

S2

C0 JUN 1995

E

E

(

-C2

3C 3C

C2

E

E E E

E

E

E , E

0 JUN 1995GLOUCESTER COUNTY



NAME

CORALLORRHIZA WISTERIANA

COREOPSIS ROSEA

CROTONOPSIS ELLIPTICA

CYPERUS ENGELMANNII

CYPERUS LANCASTRIENSIS


DALIBARDA REPENS


DESMODIUM STRICTUM

DRABA REPTANS


ELEOCHARIS TORTILIS

ELEPHANTOPUS CAROLINIANUS

ERIOCAULON PARKERI

ERIOPHORUM GRACILE

ERIOPHORUM TENELLUM


GLYCERIA LAXA

GYMNOPOGON BREVIFOLIUS

HELONIAS BULLATA

HETERANTHERA MULTIFLORA

LUZULA ACUMINATA

MELANTHIUM VIRGINICUN

MICRANTHEMUM MICRANTHEMOIDES

MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS


NYMPHOIDES CORDATA

ONOSMOOIUM VIRGINIANUM

PANICUM ACICULARE


COMMON NAME FEDERAL STATE REGIONAL STATUS STATUS STATUS

SPRING CORAL-ROOT

PINK TICKSEED

ELLIPTICAL RUSHFOIL

ENGELMANNIS FLATSEDGE.

LANCASTER FLATSEDGE

ROUGH FLATSEDGB

ROBIN-RUN-AWAY

SMOOTH TICK-TREFOIL

PINELAND TICKTREFOIL

CAROLINA WHITLOW-GRASS

KNOTTED SPIKERUSH

TWISTED SPIKERUSH

ELEPHANT'S FOOT

PARKER'S PIPEWORT

SLENDER COTTONGRASS

ROUGH COTTONGRASS

PINE BARREN BONESET

NORTHERN MANNAGRASS

SHORT-LEAVED SKELETON GRASS

SWAMP-PINK

MUD PLANTAIN

HAIRY WOODRUSH

VIRGINIA BUNCHFLOWER

NUTTALL'S MUDWORT

LONG-AWNED SMOKE GRASS

PINE BARREN- SMOKE GRASS

FLOATING HEART


BRISTLING PANIC GRASS

SMOOTH BEARD TONGUE

3C

C2

LT

E E

C2* E E

3C

K.

LP LP

E E

E E E E

E E E

E E

GRANK

G5

G3

G5

G4Q

G5

G5

G5

G5

G4

G5

G4

G5

G5

G3

G5

G5

G3

G5

G5

G3

G4 G5

G5

GH

G5 G3

G5 G4

G4G5

G5

SRANK

SX. 1 S2 S2 S2 S2 SH SH.1 S3

S2 SH SH Si

SH S2 SH Si

S2 S2 Si

S3 S2 Si

Si

SH Si

S3

S3 Si

Sl Si

LP

LP

LP

LP

LP LP

(

E E

E

K

-I . 0

CGLOUCESTER COUNTY



NAME.

PHASEOLUS POLYSTACHIOS

POLYGALA INCARNATA..

POLYGONUM OPELOUSANUM

PRUNUS ANGUSTIF6LIA' PYCNANTHEMUM TORREI

QUERCUJS IMBRICARIA

RHYNCHOSPORA GLOBULARIS


RHYNCHOSPORA" SCIRPOIDES SCHEUCHZERIA PALUSTRIS

SCHIZAEK PUSILLA ' , 'SP.I RANTHES 'LACINIATA

.j -' SPIRANTHES OOORATA "

THASPIUM ARBIRIOOE TIPULARIA DISCOLOR UTRICULARIA BIFLORA


VERBENA SIMPLEX

VERNONIA GLAUCA

VULPIA ELLIOTEA

0 Records Processed

COMMON NAME FEDERAL STATUS

WILD KIDNEY BEAN

PINK MILKWORT,

NORTHEASTERN SMARTWEED

CHICKASAW PLUM

TORREY'S MOUNTAIN MINT

•SHINGLE'OAK GRASS-LIKE. BEAKED RUSH

,PALE BEAK RUSH

LON6BEAKED BALDRUSH

ARROW-GRASS

, ,CURLY GRASS FERN LACE-LIP LADIESi-TRESSES 7

"*.FRAGRANT LADIES'-TRESSES

HAIRY-JOINTED MEADOW°PARSNIP

CRANEFLY ORCHID

TWO-FLOWERED BLADDERWORT

* BEAKED CORN-SALAD

NARROW-LEAVED VtRVAIN'

BROAD-LEAVED IRONWEED

SQUIRREL FESCUE

STATE STATUS

E

E E E E

E

3CE

E E

E' E E

REGIONAL STATUS

GRANK

- )

JUN 1995

Q �

SRANK

S2

SH S2 SI Si s1.1 Sl S3 S2 SH" s3 Si S2 SX.1 S3 SI Si

SH S1 SH

t

G4 G5 G5 G5 G2 G5 G5 0G3 "G4 G5

LP G3

00G5

G5 G4G5 G5 G5 G5 "G5 G5

.

N.J. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife http //www.state nj us/dep/fgw/tandespp htm

New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Xi N

Conserve Willife Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of

New Jersey

Endangered Species are those whose prospects for survival in New Jersey are in immediate danger because of a loss or change in habitat, over-exploitation, predation, competition, disease, disturbance or contamination. Assistance is needed to prevent future extinction in New Jersey.

Threatened Species are those who may become endangered if conditions surrounding them begin to or continue

to deteriorate.

List updated 3/18/02

Endangered 4 Threatened

Bittern, American Botaurus lentiginosos* H Bobolink huolchonyx oryzivorus

Eii bald Haliaeetus leucocephalus Eg, bl IHaliaeetus leucocephalus ]Ege adBR EgebadNB ..,e .., ..• .. .. .. ........ . ...... ..... ...

.............. .. . . .. .. . . ....... ..... .. ...... ..... .... ...... .... .................. ... ....... .. ..... .... ... Falcon, peregrine d Falco peregrinus [Hawk, Cooper's ýAccipitercooperii

". .. o........... ...... ........ ......... ...... .. ... [.. . -- . A......... .. ...... ............... . 1 lohwnorthern I Accipiter gentiflis* Hwred-shoulderedF. [BtoineatuNB

Grebe, pied-billed Podilymbus podiceps* Night-heron, Nycticorax nycticorax* S... .. . . . . ..... ...... ............... i ........ ............. ........... ...... ...... ..............- :. . L ..... ... ......... . .. . [. .................... .... .............. ....... [.

I r blackn Ngh-cerownedioac '.Harrie Circus cyaneus* Ngthrn

,northern CNyellow-crowned yctanassa violaceus H.. . r.h........... .............................. ..... ............. ................................ .. .... . . ... ...... ...... . .. ................................................ ... =

aouldered Buteo lineatus BR Knot, red Calidris canutus

Owsor-aed:iAsio flammeus* OsryPandion hlats ... ............. ................ . ................... .. ...... . o... ........-. . .. ....... ..................... .. . ..... ........... ......................... ........ ............ Plover. piping .Charad.dus melodus Owlbarred ..... .. Si ...............................................

..... .. ........... ................ .: ................. ...... ................................. .......................................... ...... ... .............................s.......................... Snpiper, upland Batramia Ionigicauda Owln-ae llAsioou

Shrike, loggerhead Lanius ludovicianus Rail, black [Laterallus jamaicensis

.....................-...... ....-.... ..... .. ..........-.. -. . ............ =..... ............. Skimmer.bl..kRyn chops niger BR I[Skimmer, black jRynchops niger NB

S.............................. . ................ .. . .. ......... .. .... . . ............ ......... ........... Sparrow, Henslow's iAmmodramus hensiowii psshopper .. Ammodramus savannarum* ':Pa s rc ls ....... ............................... .. Sparrow, vesper NPooecetes gramineus BR Sparrow, Savannah sercheus

.. I ............- qsandwichensis* -. .... .......... .............. ...= .......................... .. . .......... .......... .... T'iern, least Sterna.. an.....~[prrw vesper I[Pooecetes graminieus NB .. r s tSe. o................. .................... . ... ......................... e....... .. ... .................... ......... ................................. ....... . ll~er, l lMelanerpe s Ierroseate Stoma dougaltfii* TWoodpecker, red-headed I, ertroehau

7/26/02 3.43 PM

.. .. ... .... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .... .. ............. .. .............

BIRDS H

| j ............ oo........................................ •...........;x ....... ... z ................ = ............ ..o.o ..................................... ......... . ..... .. ...................... ......... ............ ....

1 of 4

N.J. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife http�JIwww.state nj us/dep/fgw/tandespp.htm

Tern, roseate Sterna dougalJii* Woodpecker, red-headed I I I I erythrocephalus

Wren, sedge - Cistothors platensis............. . ............:... ....:: ::.....-.•:= := .............. .................. ..... ...... ... I- -- ----------------

*Only breeding population considered endangered or threatened., ..

-. BR .... Breedng popFederally endangnered .o threatenedg .. . o . + " - BR - Breeding population only; NB -non-breeding population only ""•

- 2~ . . . . . . . . .. , .. .. REPTILES + .

Endangered Threatened , t.................................................................. ................. ..,....... ............... ...... . .................. .......................... .... ............................

:!Rattlesnake, timber . Crotalus h. horridus :i; Snake, northern pine1 iPituophis m. melanoleucus Snake, corn .. Elaphe g. guttata ::Turtle, Atlantic green : Chelonla mydas**

," .. .................................. ............. .... ......................... 7 .- .......................................... ... .................. ... .. ......... ...............

:.Turtle, b6g" I Clemmys muhlenbergi :'Turtle, wood iI Clemmys insculpta • .. ........... ...... ..... ............. . . . . . ....... ........ ...... .............. ......................... ....... .. .... ... ................................................ ...

IIAtlantic Hawksbill Eretmbkhelys imbricata-:'

Atlantic Leatherback'I Dermochelys coriacea" ....................... .-..-.. . ...... ...

: : Atlantic Loggerhead yCkretta care pa'

lAtlantic Rdley Lepidochelys kempi" il .... + : --:---------.-.-------.-.----..... ............... ..- .......... . ... ..... .. . ... .. .......... ........ . . ..... . ....

.2 *"Federally endangered or threatened . . . . . . .. . . ........ ........................ .. ...................... . ........................ ....

AMPHIBIANS S.......... . ............... . . . . .. ....

Endangered I -Threatened ..... .......... .... ....................... . ...................... .... . ............................ .................... .......... .... ......

Salmader buespote iAmbyvstoma laterale aaadr easter muEseudotriton montanusl ilSalam ander, bleasptenteige mytm irnm. aaadrln-aldIIEicalniad......... ......................... .lmdr1..I.......

flSalamander, Tremblay's fl Ambystoma tremblay.l .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . ................... :'Treefrog, pine barrens lHyla andersonhi

ITreefrog, southern gray !IHyla chrysocelis _ :. ........................................................ I ... ............................ ......... ...... . - ,

i (

7/26/02 3:43 PM

i

http://www.state nj us/dep/fgw/tandespp.htmN.J. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

2 of 4

http//www.state nj us/dep/fgw/tandespp htm

. .. ..... .. ..................... . ..... E........... ............. . .. ... ....-......... I ......... INVERTEBRATES .. ............= ..... ...........=..==.....=......=.... ......... ...... .'...............'.e.. ...'. ................................. ...= ..=== =..=== ........==== ..-"== =..===...====..==... ...== ...=== == ... .......... .... ... ".."....;;; " ..' ... IrEndangered Threatened . ........................................................... ... . ............................................ ... .................. [Beetle, American burying iNicrophorus mericanus*~ ':Beetle, northeastern beach tiger Cnndela d. dor .e.......e......u....� ........r.......n.............F.°.e ......... iCopper, bronze Lycaena hyllus Floater, triangle (mussel) j lamidonta und .. .................... .................................- ......... ... .-.-.............-.-......... .................. .................................... ...-. ..... IFloater, brook (mussel) :Alasmidonta varicosa AElfin, frosted (butterfly) jfalpIysi .. .................... ... ............................ .. .. .... .. .... ....... .. ...... ...... ..... ...... ........ illater, green (mussel) Lasmigona subviridis Fritfillary, silver-bordered (butterfy Boia selene m

~fSkipper, arogos (butterfly) .lAtrytone arogos arogos iiLampmussel, eastern (mussel) IjLampsilis radiata

Skipper, Appalachian grizzled I; yno (butterfly) Pyrgus wyandot I Lampmussel, yellow (mussel) |I Lampsilis cariosa

.... ............. .. .................................... . .......... .............................................. .............. ..................................,Mucket, tidewater (mussel) ............... I L. .ohrMussel, dwarf wedge !IAlasm'donta he'te

"Pondmussel, eastern (mussel) JLigumia nasuta ................................ .................. .. ... ... ..... ... Satyr, Mitchell's (butterfly) -.. eonympha m.

,White, checkered (butterfly) ... Ponia protodice

"**Federally endangered or threatened

MAMMALS

:::Bat, Indiana .Myoti sodalis*

Bobcat [Lynx rufus ... :. ............. . ... ............... . . . . . . . . ..

:Whale, black Balaenaglacialis** i.... .. .. .. ..... ..... .. ..... ... . .. .. ........ .......... .... .. ....... .. .......... ....... ..... ,.....................,...,,. ....... ,,............,,,,.........,•.......,

H:Whale, blue IBalaenoptera musculus

::Whale, fin Balaenoptera physalus*

::Whale, Megaptera humpback [i[novaeangliae

--- - -- -- -.. -.. -.. . -. . -. --------------- . .... .... .... .... .... .... ...

:Whale, sei [ý Baaenoptera borealls"

:Whale,sperm rhsee

... .. .. .. .. .. .. .;macrocephalus**

Woodrat, eastern Neotoma floridana

"**Federally Endangered

7/26/02 3"43 PM

.. .. . . . .. ..... ... ............. i .. ......... . ....... . . .. .. . .......

I ............. .......... ........ ... ............................. ......... ......... ....... ................. ......... ............................ .. ........ I.,... ..... ...... .= ...... .. .... ...... .................... .. .. .... .

N J. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

3 of 4

NJ. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife httpJ/www.state.nj.usfdep/fgw/tandespp btm

FISH

Endangered ...... ................... ......... ........ ..... ................ .... .... ..... .................. .........

"Sturgeon s-h-o'rnose] [Acipenser brevirostrurn**_

"**Federally Endangered

The lists of New Jersey's endangered and nongame wildlife species are maintained by the DEP's DMsion of Fish and Wildlife's Endangered and Non-game Species Program. These lists are used to determine protection and management actions necessary to ensure the survival of the state's endangered and nongame wildlife. This work is made possible through voluntary contributions received through Check-off donations to the Endangered Wildlife Conservation Fund on the New Jersey State Income Tax Form, the sale of Conserve Wildlife License Plates; and donations. For more information about the Endangered and Nongame Species Program or to report a sighting of endangered or threatened wildlife, contact the Endangered and Nongame Species, NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 400, Trenton, NJ 08625-0400, or call 609-292-9400.

. ..¶~tt .tt¶~¶~~t . ~ X¶tAtVt~VV ............. ~Wt t. ¶ V~t*¶t.V t~~t

jj~z

7/26/02 3:43 PM

N.J. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife http'J/www.state.nj.u s/dep/f~gw/tandespp htm

4 of 4

Local Water Supply Well Survey

Water Well Restriction Area

0 1 4000 FT

-ISCALE

FROM NEWFIELD, NJ 7 112' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, 1953 PHOTOREVISED 1986

COMMUNITY WELLS AND WELL RESTRICTION AREA INVICINITY OF SHIELD ALLOY

METALLURGICAL CORPORATION

I I If i 4

(3 CTable 1

Summary of Large Capacity Well Search Results Shleldalloy Metallurgical Corporation

April 2001'

Number' . *,Permit Local Distance I Direction Well Depth Pump Capacity Withdrawal -Nu rnber O .wner's Na rne , u ~ r Identificatio n Latitude Lo ngitde (m iles) /I(Com pass) (f eet), (gpm ) ' Rate (gpd) .

2237P, Shieldailoy Metalurgical Corp... 3119608 W . '393224" 750120 03IN10107,00 2237P .. ShIeldalloy MetaluIrgica Corp',. 310548:42' Layne 3.:.. .'""893224 . 750120 . 03 WNW 7 W100 30,000 2237P Shildalloy'M.taiurgica p.Corp3.3128710 RW"S ' 3o3.2. 5760128 3 1 5 0 30,000 2237P. Shieldall'oy M"ta" r t Coirp *.;3127I RW6 .. 393220.. 76. ..501.280 " /"W 25 : 100 130,000

2237•.:" Shietdalloy Metalurgica"iCo.:". .•12 39W28•• . 39321 .'.7501243.'0.1 WSW 75 20 , 220,000

5147 Newfield Borough Water Dept 3104559 3 393254 750121 i 0.7 NNW 162 400 265,000

5147 Newfield Borough Water Dept '5100046 5 393246 750031 0.7 / NE 140- 500 335,000 ...... .... '•r•"i.:.............. ..."5500I58 ..WeU5''' .33232 7.0'I7 ".'.0 N"...:1.8,00"

cu6029 qepers, Uy... 5500 58". .......

CU0129 Petronglo Farms, Inc. 3121627 Well 6 393213 750146 0.6 /WSW 100 350 126,000 CU105R'*:.•:* C.op rg o'o"','- e.l 0' .' '::..3500032 . ' W •'l! 393P7 75014$ '0.$ISW 129 ." 1 .... .00

GL0048 Pine Grove Camp, Inc. 3503230 Well 1, 393148 750145 0.8 /SW 100 500 180,000

GL0182" Leshay Fatms, Samue- ""'M1230 Well 2 1393243"1' 750135', 0.71t NW. 13d*::...:: 0::0 000.0

"GLOI82 Leshay Farms'Sa'mief • : 1 5100392' Well 1 393253 ' 750045 07"7" 'N 104. 10. '60,000

Notes: Source& NJDEP -Water Supply Element, Bureau of Water Allocation; Large Capacity (100,000 GPD) Well Search Within 5 Miles of Site Focus; Performed on 3/17/00

Number field indicates either a Water Allocation Permit, Agricultural Certification, or Registration Number

Distance field Indicates the distar~ice iii miles between the well and the search focus. Direction field indicates compass direction from the search focus. Withdrawal rate for Shieldallow Metalurgical Corp. wells based on ground water remediation system operatio-nrecords

Withdrawal rates for Newfleld Borough Water Dept wells based on reports by Mr. Jack Harris, Water Department Superintendant, Borough of Newfield • Maximum pumping rate from well permit .

C

-1

Table 2 Summary of Well Search Results

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation Apnl-01

Scend Average Maidmma Spedfic Cpacity Alas Sheet Wel Locaton Screen Interval Withdrawal PuRipng Capacty Capacity

Permn Number Instal Date WeE Owy:er Owner's Address Well Localon Address Coordinates Lot/Block Diameter FBG I (GPDI Rate (GPO (GPM/FT) (GPM) Wel Use sP~et 31

31-6890 4/18/1973 Leshay Bros Newfield Catawba Ave 3142658 6 70-100 50 rrigation

31-31860 6/29/1909 Sam te Shay Catawba Ave, Nqwfied Same 3542 659 17/24 4 75-85 .. ,qD $6¢ 3t'31M859 81291989 Sam Le Shay Catawba Ave-. Newfeld Same 31 42659 18a/24 4 80-90 31.20606 3/20/1984 D&M Builders 596 Ctaa1on Rd, Franikn Twp 3142 661 3c/519 2 55-59 500 500 9 Domestic

31-20755 7/20/1984 D&M Buiders 596 Clayton Rd., Frarndn Twp 3142 661 3d/519 2 54-58 500 500 9 Domestc

31-21627 6/t2A1984 Carman Petrc o. 5014 N, O4Ise* Drto.e Vlnold 3.1 42 74 13183 40s60_.... 3* gtlin,

31.28468 /20)1969 SoI.Fe*elsteon 882 $, Sirlin5g Rd. V ar4 3t42 674" ,05143 2... 145-50 150 300 I Domesti

31.19465 9/18/1982 James Bringer 555 E. Elm Rd, Vineland 31 42675 3/968 4 75-85 15 Domestic

31-143 5/15/1950 Gus Hauser Weymouth Rd, Newfield 31 42675 4 140-150 30.000 25 NI Irigatlon

31-49 153 4/27/196 Eugene Magwcao 756 strawerrYAvo,,e.iland Same 3142674 4/090t 4 00-.00 12 :.

31-19723 4/5/1983 Petonglo Farms 5014 N Delsea Drive. Newfleld 3142678 10/83 -'6 42-62 Irrigation

31-9125 8/1401975 J Ruberto 605W "borAve, Vlnend Arbor AveNaestAve 3142678 2 51-61 300 400 50 Domestc

31-23513 9/12/1985 BruceWean RD 1 Box 511W Garden Rd Pottsgrove Twp 3142678 46/67 3 62-72 50 Irrigation

"31-6092 11/3I1969 8qrouorNewlWld BMaki.. . sL4Nw10 :3t4`3 42 0 10.. 129,149 211l 100 Publicppty:: 31-13812 6/13/1978 Krykory Torgover Weymout Rd., Vineland Same 3142686 6b/581 2 53-58 200 300 DomeskIc

31-21871 9/111984 NewlinCaudil Aua WIlowGroveRri WeymouiRd. 3.142568 :. 4 .90-l00 800 600., 12. .:.::0omestic

31-21871 9/26/1954 Newl•r Caudilt Aura WilowGrov• RO. WeynoumRd, 31 42 6M8 6.58t 4 80-90 590 :00.18 .... :omesl.

31-19468 9/271182 Rlichard(rason 3151 Northf.astAve.ýVneian, EaslAveane 3142 688' 3 .70-•0 .. 5 W" 't!

3110066 7/10/153:>:: L P IPts. Proae 4Ave..i.Isn S4me .l4268 4 .. *045-5l :5o 6W0 1.... ame Cnd

31-1133 9/12/1953 .AlJreosdserman', iArborAve, Vrneland rSame. 3142688 4 65-71 3 ,r400r . eslC

Sheet 35

35-12130 7/15/1991 Frank Marchisele 3183N East Blvd, Vineland Same 3502311 12/114 4 90-100 11 Domesle

35-2734 1162 Getneremer $wAve.Vlneiand Same 3502312 7 0,-70 2W0 .50 a2...

3543230 4/1211982 Joseph Petro•glo Jr. 4724 NK Detsea Dr, West Ave .3502312 3 34-64 00" .- ...... klgaelo.

35-32 7/12/1950 Frank Russo West l N Vineland Same 3502313 4 99-129 21600 825 90 Irrigation

35-4248 7/1/1984 Bob Carpenter 168 Arbor Ave, Vineland Same 3502313 8/83 2 90-95 10 Domestic

35-75 3/5/1952 Joseph Girard E Blvd &S•raewberryAve, V/ieand Same 3502313 4 255-315 300 300 8 Domestic

354281 8/16/1993 Joln Rugg94no 311 Baya Ave, Vineland StrawbetyAve 350232t *24 03/114 4 8.090

35*1653 5/10/1978 Ronald Jacobson 181 S1rawterryAv 35 02 321 3 84-94 200 400 ...DonterAd

35-18262 12/14/1997 W.Serad 745 Strawbierr Avg Same 35 02 321 67/7004 4 .:..,0..90,100 .1,q Domestilc:

3S-5352 2/24/1986 LeoPalmonqt 31Z7N 8W•4 3502321. 10(j14 4 $0-.90 150 .300 Domost .

35-11946 5/16/1991 Richard Bruno 3120N East Ave. Vineland Same 3502322 28/114 4 95-105 400 600 25 Domestic

35-12625 1/711992 Richard Lorenzin! 3181 N. East Ave, Vineland Same 3502322 20/121 4 90-100 400 600 10 Domestic

35-13775 8/16/1993 John & Margaret Rugglano 311 BayorAve, Vineland Samwe4ry Ave 3502322 2403/114 4 85-95 25 Domeatic

35-14414 9/27194 Richerd Urn 1069 Lnda Lane. Vineand Steawberry Ave. 3502322 24 02)114 4 108-118 500 750 20 Domestic

35-14783 4/11/1995 Wes Cornel 1022 Holmes Ave. Vinelend Srawberry Ave 3502322 24 03/114 4 73-83 500 1800 208 Domnestc

35-15257 9/27/1994 Richard Urn 1019 lUnda Lane, Vineland Strawberry Ave 3502322 2402/114 4 100-110 Heat Pump Discharge

35-3132 2/2/1982 Daneel S. Falasca Box 127 Morrs Ave S1trwberry Ave 3502322 3 69-79 15 Domestic

35-3133 2/2/1982 Danel S Falasca Box 127 Morris Ave Srawbeeny Ave 3502322 3 69-79 I 15 Domestic

3,1-0267 9/15/1987 KDRCoor~actors laBox 237.•.Vnelaeied 3502323 32.0 1114 2 .: 84-90 600 600' 10.0,.es::*"-:::":.;.i

35-10153 .1124/1990 JamesScrale' 560.E ForestGrpvo.Rd, Same .. .: 350Q373 11/121 4 115-W10 .D...me.

3,12897 1/13/1199 PthrelI' 93,5 Mag0 Rd K, E, Ave .35 02 323 :32114.. 4". 8040 D.omes4r

*12842 '...3/211992 LouhsDajeianri'o 3005N, Eest.Avo,)cVidal Same .. 502323 M15/121 4 .5-68 500 1800 .2 .:. 0011st85 35-13276.. 812/15992 caatcSScrise ... 3178 EsAve,, •etnand... Same '352323 .::. 4 :10-20. 400 6500 20 Does8.

35-36111 3/17A5963 Charles R, Johion 741 Stpw"cnyAve- :3502323, 1a5/58. 120,127 ~.lceh 35"49!6 149 .. Ro P ... ou .. R .... M ..... 4 025...,3502.$23 .......:.!146 . .;:... ...2.1 290.:: 8025

35-08272 2/16/1989 Garden Homes N Desea Dr. Garden Rd. Forest Grove Rd. 3502324 32.02/114 4 73-83 150 150 11 I Domestic

35-13626 12/23/1992 Mary H Gamba 3095 North East Blvd Vineland Same 3502324 9/114 2 88-98 300 400 7,8 10 Domestic

35-05892 =0121987 DariefMCvtc0emot 26689 0 Aiilirt4%Vl ." Same 35 02 325:.- ..34/114 2 78-85,.,:ts8

3.544509 12/1I711993 phtlo& Mm4 Chapman 2308 N FastAve Sam• .34 02 ;25 V" " 4 " -90 400 "60" 1" '""..

35138t 10/31/194. Mary. C'Meyr-60wo ........... Se... . .. 3502.32 . 4 126...:: .;v.96' 400 6w0 0 ......... 35.7•xo •21• A~r~c•330n koa•vihand.,.... .. Same " "' 35 02 ý26 .-:3611114•~i .... ..7-c',i! :" ..

35-15575 1/20/1995 Steven Gaber 267 E. Forest Grove Rd. Same 3502326 6/123 4 75-85 300 400 8 Domestic

35-02260 4/111981 Richard McDermott DivisionS•Sreet 3502326 2 71-76 200 500 18 Domestic

35-3929 11115/1984 Wtili•rn rawvlka 3502326 9 10/121 2 72-79 NI Domestc

35-07901 70211988 Lotte Reed Jones 304 E. Forest Grove Rd Same 35 02 326 36/114 4 90-100 500 750 11 Domestic

Source NJDOEP - Waler Supply Elemert, Bureau of Water Alcalon, Wei Permit Search Withn I Mile of Site Focus, Performed during March 2000 NI - Pump not instaled * Pump capacity reported In Large Capacity Wei Search

C

C

C 0 1,500 3,000

GRAPHIC SCALE

I

N

w*E

S

LEGEND

0 5100392

TRCW Customr-FoISe

LARGE CAPACITY WELL PERMIT NUMBER

5 Waterside Crossing Windsor, CT 06095 (860) 289-8631

SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORPORATION NEWFIELD, NEW JERSEY

FIGURE 1 RESULTS OF LARGE CAPACITY WELL SEARCH -1 MILE RADIUS

26770-0060-00100

S -- � = U

Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, Decommissioning ...avan v.a letli. contour Inihral 100 feet....

Documents

Transcript of Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, Decommissioning ...avan v.a letli. contour Inihral 100 feet....