Sheffield Floods
-
Upload
merritt-nixon -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Sheffield Floods
Sheffield Floods
A first look at aquatic invertebrate data collected before and after the
June 2007 floods
Anna Ritchie and Lina Ilia
Setting
• In June of 2007 more rain fell in two days than would usually fall within two months.
Research questions
• How are stream invertebrates impacted by flooding?– Impact on abundance and diversity?
• Are both benthic and hyporheic communities affected in similar ways?
Stream invertebrate communities
• Benthic macroinvertebrates:– Live on the upper layer of riverbed substrates– Commonly used for biological assessment
• Hyporheic invertebrates:– Live beneath and adjacent to the riverbed– Both surface and groundwater influences– Comparatively little is known and understood
about their ecology
Sampling in the Don Catchment
Sheffield
Barnsley
Rotherham
Chesterfield
• 20 sites on 12 rivers were sampled (hyporheic and benthic) at the end of may
• Sites were re-sampled at the beginning of July, after the June floods
• Sampling included some sites directly downstream of reservoirs
Benthic vs Hyporheic hypotheses
• Benthic abundance and diversity were expected to decrease
• Hyporheic abundance and diversity were expected to increase
Are there differences between pre- and post-flood samples?
– Does abundance change?– Does diversity change?– Are there different taxa present before and
after the floods?– Do individual taxa respond differently?– Do dams have an influence on the flood
effect?
Pre- and Post-Flood invertebrate abundance
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
hyporheic benthic
Ch
ang
e in
Lo
g10
Ab
un
dan
ce
Paired t-test, p=0.59N=20
Paired t-test, p<0.001N=11
hyporheic benthic
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
hyporheic benthic
chan
ge
in #
tax
a
p<0.001N=11
p=0.41N=20
hyporheic benthic
Change in diversity
Are the same taxa present before and after the floods?
• Benthic– Taxa present only after floods
• Helodidae*, Corixidae*
– Taxa present only before floods• Ceratopogonidae, Empididae
• Hyporheic:– Taxa present only after floods:
• Bosminidae, Sididae, Calanoida,
– Taxa present only before floods:• none
Do different taxa respond differently to the flood event?
Benthic taxa
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
Lo
g10
ab
un
dan
ce
Pre-flood
Post-flood
Hyporheic taxa
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
Lo
g1
0 a
bu
nd
an
ce Pre-flood
Post-flood
*
*
**
***
What about the dams?
Sheffield
Barnsley
Rotherham
Chesterfield
Hyporheic
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1 2C
ha
ng
e i
n l
og
10
a
bu
nd
an
ce
Benthic
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
01 2
Ch
ang
e in
lo
g10
ab
un
dan
ce
no dam with damno damwith dam
p<0.001N=6
p=0.001N=5
p=0.047N=6
p=0.052N=14
Change in mean invertebrate abundance between sites with and
without dams
Benthic vs Hyporheic hypotheses
• Benthic abundance and diversity were expected to decrease – Supported by the results
• Hyporheic abundance and diversity were expected to increase– Not supported by the results
Conclusions
• The two communities show different patterns before and after floods as well as between sites with and without dams
However these patterns may be a result of various other factors (such as insect emergence or water chemistry)
Next steps. . .
– More thorough description of hyporheic invertebrate community
– Investigate the importance of other measured variables (ex: substrate, discharge, water chemistry)
– Resample in 2008 to look for seasonal effects, compare trends between years, and investigate the recovery of the communities
Acknowledgements
Marie Curie Early Stage Research Training Fellowship, Environment Agency, University of Sheffield Catchment Science Centre, Lorraine Maltby and Phil Warren, Everyone who helped out in the field during our mad dash to catch the immediate flood effects, and everyone who listened and offered advice…