Shear strength of high-strength bolts · tempered alloy steel in accordance with ASTM A354 (12) and...
Transcript of Shear strength of high-strength bolts · tempered alloy steel in accordance with ASTM A354 (12) and...
Lehigh UniversityLehigh Preserve
Fritz Laboratory Reports Civil and Environmental Engineering
1964
Shear strength of high-strength boltsJames J. Wallaert
John W. Fisher
Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/engr-civil-environmental-fritz-lab-reports
This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lehigh Preserve. It has been acceptedfor inclusion in Fritz Laboratory Reports by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended CitationWallaert, James J. and Fisher, John W., "Shear strength of high-strength bolts" (1964). Fritz Laboratory Reports. Paper 1822.http://preserve.lehigh.edu/engr-civil-environmental-fritz-lab-reports/1822
IIII
IIIIIIIIIII~I
I
rHE SHEAR STRENGTH OF HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS
by
James J. Wallaert
John W. Fisher
This work was carried out as part of theproject on Large Bolted Connections,sponsoredfinancially by the Pennsylvania Department of Highways, the Department of Commerce - Bureau of PublicRoads,and the American Institute of Steel Construction. Technical guidance is provided by the ResearchCouncil on Riveted and Bolted Structural Joints.
Fritz Engineering Laboratory.Department of Civil Engineering
Lehigh UniversityBeth~ehem, Pennsylvania
July 1964
Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report No. 288.20
ii
TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Effect of Type of Testing Device
3~3 Effect of Initial Bolt Preload
3.4 Condition of the Faying Surfaces
3.5 Location of the Shear Planes
3.6 Effect of Bolt Grade
3.7 Effect of Bolt Diameter
3.8 Effect of Connected Material
THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A325 AND ALLOY STEEL BOLTS
2.1 Bolt Material Properties and Bolt Description
2~2 Plate Material Properties
2.3 Description of Test Jigs
2.4 Bolting Up Procedure
2.5 Bolt Jig Instrumentation
Z.6 Test Procedure
2.7 The Experimental Program
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Objective
1.2 Historical Bac~ground
c
2
2
4
6
6
8
8
10
10
11
13
17
17
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
Page
1
CON TEN T So FTAB L E
ABSTRACT
2.
1.
3.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
iii
.3.9 Effect of Grip and Loading Span
3.10 Effect of End Restraint
4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
6. TABLES AND FIGURES
7. REFERENCES
IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
A B S T R ACT
In many bolted connections the fasteners are subjected to:::;.:','
shear loading. The objective of this study was to determine the be-,-' :.~..." ';
havior of single high-strength bolts under static shear loadings.
A total of 75 A354 BC,A3.54 BD andA490 bolts were tested in jigs
made of A440and constructional alloy steel. In addition, 72 A325
bolts were tested, 66 in A7 steel jigs and 6 in A440 steel jigs.-
The effect of a number of variables upon the ultimate shear
strength and deformation at ultimate load was studied. The vari.ables
were internal bolt tension, location of the shear planes, condition of
the faying surfaces, bolt grade and diameter, connected materi.al, grip
and loading span, end restraint in the tension jigs, and type of test
ing device. The only variables which significantly affected the ulti
mate shear strength were the location of the shear plane, the grade of
bolt, and the type of testing device.
-1-
1. I N T ROD U C T ION
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE
Before evaluating the behavior of a bolted or riveted structural
connection the behavior of the component parts must be determined. The
static strength of the connected material is dete~ined by coupon tests
of plate material from the same ingot and rolling as the connected
material. The other component of the structural connection is the fasten
er or the connecting medium. The fasteners in a butt-type splice joint
under load are subjected mainly to a shearing force. A means of deter
mining the shear strength and behavior of individual fasteners is desir
able so that their performance may be ,compared to that of fasteners in a
large connection. Also, a knowledge of their behavior is necessary if
theoretical studies of large joints is undertaken.
Figure 1 depicts the results of typical double shear tests con
ducted on the "A14l rlvet ;.,Jhe high-strength A325 bolt, and the new higher
strength A490 bolt. The ordinate in Fig. 1 is average shear stress on
the fastener, while the abcissa is the deformation of the fastener
under applied load. This figure shows that the A490 bolt has a higher
load-carrying capacity than the A325 bolt and that both can carry more
load than the hot-driven rivet. It also shows that ductility decreases
as fastener strength increases.
Because the A354 BD and A490 bolts have greater proof loads
and tensile strengths than the A325 bolt, they create greater slip resis-
-2-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-3-
tance and have higher shear strengths. When the higher-strength bolts
are used in high-strength steel joints, the joints will be better pro
portioned because fewer bolts are required. A research program wasini
tiated to study the basic tensile 'and. shear properties of the A354 BC,
A354BD, and A490 bolts. The behavior of these bolts in direct tension
and torqued tension, and their respons~to.other special tests can be
found in Ref. 1. Results of similar tests conducted on the A325 bolt
can be found in Ref. 2.
The main objective of the study as reported herein was to
determine the double shear strength of single A325, A354 BC, A354 BD, and
A490 bolts and to investigate the effect of a number of variables o~ the
shear strength and the deformation at ultimate lo·ad. A second objective
was to establish the complete load-deformation relationship of the
fasteners.. With this information the analysis of the load-deformation
behavior of large joints can be determined, since their performance de
pends not only on the strength of the fastener but also on its deforma
tion capacity.
The test series described in this report represents one phase
in the study of the ultimate strength of bolted joints. The interpreta
tions and conclusions reported herein are based on the results of double
shear tests of single 7/8 in. and 1 in. fasteners tested in A7, A440, and
constructional alloy steel shear-inducing testing jigs.
-4-
1.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
A considerable amount of experimental and theoretical work has
been conducted on bolted and riveted joints. In general, most of these
tests were on small scale specimens; only a few large specimens have been
tested. Although many of the studies concerned with joint strength, the
single and double shear behavior of single bolts has been inve~tigated.
C. Batho(3) in 1931 used various grades of single black bolts
installed in single and double shear tension jigs to determine the rela-
tionship between the installed torque and the slip load. Bathois tension
jigs were very similar to those in the study reported herein. However,
only one of the bolts was tested to failure. Load and deformation read-
ings were taken up to slip load for all tests.
Wilson and Thomas(4) conducted static and fatigue tests on
1 in. rivets loaded in double shear. The number of fasteners in the
joint varied from two to eight. Baron and Larson(5), who also conducted
static and fatigue tests, showed that the substitution of high-strength
A325 bolts for rivets does not change the plate efficiencies of a joint
subjected to static 'load.
Munse, Wright, and Newmark(6) conducted an extensive test
series using 3/4 in. A325 bolts to determine the static and fatigue be-
havior of bolted joints. They found that the initial bolt tension has
little effect on the ultimate shear strength. Their tests of two-bolt
'-ad-a. ri::'hre':e~bo'itL lrap:"'~}oih[t'S:: an!d-=- ttilMboH:: butt'-' joints~ indicated c. that~:the
type of joint has little effect on the ultimate shear strength. The- .:.--
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-5-
ultimate shear stress was about 77 ksi in the two-bolt butt joints in
which bolt failure occurred.
Tests conducted on large bolted joints at Fritz Laboratory
included material calibration(7)(8)(9). The basic shear- strength of
single A325 bolts was determined by placing a bolt in a loading jig
that produced double shear. Bolts were installed in jigs with both
lubricated and non-lubricated faying surfaces, and were torqued to var
ious degrees of tightness. Bolts in the non-lubricated jigs failed at
slightly higher loads, indicating that friction carries an insignifi
cant portion of the ultimate load. Also, the internal tension of the
bolts had no significant effect upon the ultimate shear stress.
Recent tests at the University of Illinois(lO) demonstrated
that the type of joint material has little effect on the single shear
strength of A325 and A354 bolts. Also, it was found that the A354 BD
bolts are about 25% stronger in dir~ct shear than the A325 low-hardness
bolt and 5% stronger than the A325 high-hardness bolt.
-6-
Table 1 describes the various lots of bolts used in this in
vestigation, including bolt types A354 BC, A354 BD, A325, and A490.
Lots AC, CC, and DC of A354 BCbo1ts were used. AC lot bolts
had heavy heads while CC and DC lots both had regular heads. The three
lots of A354 BD bolts, lots ED, FD, and GD, had regular heads. Although
A490 bolt lots KK and JJ were originally not part of this investigation,
the test results are included for completeness.
2.1 BOLT MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND BOLT DESCRIPTION
The A325 bolts used in the experimental program were manufactured
from quenched and tempered medium carbon steel in accordance with ASTM
A325 (11). The A354 and A490 bolts were manufactured from quenched a!1d·
tempered alloy steel in accordance with ASTM A354 (12) and ASTM A4.90 (13) ,
respectively. The manufacturers were asked to supply bolts with tens~le
strengths near the minimum called for in the appropriate ASTM specifi
cations so that minimum shear strengths could be determined. A number
of A354 bolts used for this study were of a special manufacture. The
heavy-head bolts were made to conform to the size requirements speci-
fied in ASTM A325 by reheat-treating AISI 4140 alloy steel bolts ob-
tained from a Canadian firm. Because of this reheat-treating, these
bolts had physical properties different from those of the other bolts
tested.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
E X PER I MEN TAL STU D Y 0 F
AND ALL 0 Y S TEE LBO L T S
2. THE
-·A 3 2 .s
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-7-
A325 bolts from lots Q,R, S, and T were from the same heat
and heat-treatment. They were cut to length and threaded by cutting,
after heat-treatment as required. The A325 bolts from lots 8B, Y, and
Z were from different heats and the threads were rolled after heat-
treatment.
Both ends, of each bolt were stamped with a lot designation and
number. The bolts were center-drilled to accommodate the C-frame
extensometer which was used to measure the changes in length due to
tightening.
The bolt shanks were measured with a micrometer to see whether
the actual bolt diameter varied greatly from the nominal diameter. The
7/8 in. diameter bolts were undersizecl'by:a maximum 0.003 in. and the
I in. diameter bolts were undersized by a 'maximum of 0.005in G
The mechanical properties of 'the bolts were determined from
full-size tensiie tests and 0.505 in. dia~eter tensile specimens. Tabie
2 summarizes 'the tensile test results. The full-size bolt tensile
strengths are compared to the 0.505 in. coupon tensile strengths. Except
for two lots of A325 bolts, the tensile strength of the full size speci
mens were greater, probably in part because the bolt threads prevented
normal necking and thus increased the tensile strengths. Also, the full
size specimens were affected by variations in material strength due to
the quench and tempering process, white the effects of this process were
much less when the 0.505 in. specimens were machined to· size~ The
difference in strength between bolt and coupon sample was greatest for
the larger diameter bolts, lots DC and FD.
---------------------------------------
I-8-
Additional details of the testing procedure and results are
given in Refs. 1 and 2.
2.2 PLATE' MATERIAL PROPERTIES
In order to determine the effect of the connected material on
the ultimate shear strength of the bolt, some jigs were made with A440
steel plates and other were made with constructional alloy steel plates.
The tensile strengths of the jig materials were determined by
tests of coupons cut from the same materials as the plates. The 40
A440 steel coupons and the 6 constructional alloy steel coupons tested
were 1 in. thick and were machined to a 1.50 in. width. An 8 in. gage
length was used in strain measurements. The A440 coupons had a mean.,,'1"
static yield stress of 43 ksi and, a tensile strength of 76 ksi.' The
A440 tests and results are detailed in Ref. 9. The constructional. alloy
coupons ha~ a yield strength :at 0.2% offset of 110.3 ksi and an ultimate
strength of 120 ksi.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF TEST JIGS
Two types of shear-inducing test jigs were used, as shown in
Fig. Z, to determine the double shear strength of the single bolts.
Double shear test jigs were used because they'provide" good symmetry and
because the large bolted joints tested in Fritz Laboratory are usually
double shear connections. The plates of the compression jigs (Fig. 2a)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-9-
were subjected to axial compressive loads, while axial tensile loads were
applied to the plates of the ten~ionijig~ (Fig. 2b).
The 4 in. compression test jig shown in Fig. 2a was composed. ,
of two 1 in. lap plates connected to two 1 in. main plates by a single
test bolt. The 4 in. tension jig, shown in Fig. 2b, was similar to a
butt-type joint with two 1 in. lap plates and two 1 in. main plates.
Three bolts were used to connect the material in the tension jig so
that only the test bolt was critical. As is the usual practice, the
bolt holes in the plates of both test jigs were 1/16 in. larger than
the nominal bolt diameter.
For grips exceeding 4 inches additional plies of 1 in. material
were used to provide the desired grip lengths. Each lap plate in the
8 in. grip test jigs consisted of two 1 in. plies, and the main plate
member was composed of four 1 in. plies to provide equal lap and main
plate bearing area. This arrangement assured a constant loading span-
grip ratio of 1:2, where the loading span is defined as the thickness
of the main plate (2 in. or 4 in.) and the grip is defined as the
thickness of the gripped material. All plies were arranged symmetri-
cally about the bolt jig centerline. The jigs were wide enough to
minimize axial strains. The bearing and bending conditions of the bolts
in the test jigs were comparable to these conditions in the larger joint
tests.
-10-
2.5 BOLT JIG INSTRUMENTATION
In the instrumentation of a typical tension jig, shown in
Fig. 3, two 0.0001 in. Ames dial gages were attached to the main plates
at the centerline of the bolt hole. The plungers of the dial gages
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-11-
rested on yokes tack-welded to the lap plates at the initial level of
the dial gage support. This instrumentirtion permitted measurement ,'of
the relative movement of the centerlines of the bolts due to shear and'
bending. This measurement also included the deformation of the holes
due to bearing stresses.
The deformation of the compression jigs was usually measured
by placing one 0.0001 in. dial gage between the fixed and moving heads
of the testing machine as shown in Fig. 4. The deformation measurement
;thus included the relative movement of the bolt due to shear and bend
ing, the bearing deformation in the lap and main plates, the axial
shortening of the plates, and the deformation within the testing machine
itself.
To determine the order of magnitude of the deformations within
the testing machine and other portions of the test assembly and to
determine what influence these had on the compression test jig deforma~
tion readings, one test was conducted with the dial gages mounted on
the test jig in a manner similar to that of a tension jig.
2.6 TEST PROCEDURE
In a few initial tests th~ shear jig was placed in the testing
machine and loaded continuously' until ,failure. However, slip occurred
in both tension and compression jigs, indicating that the assembly pro
cess was not altogether successfuL As a result it was necessary to
remove residual slip by loading the jigs until they slipped into bear-
-12-
ing and then removing the load before actual testing was begun. A load
of approximately 30 kips was applied to jigs connected by 7/8 in. bolts
and 60 kips was applied to jigs connected by 1 in. bolts.
The tension jig tests were conducted in a 300 kip universal
hydraulic testing machine (Fig. 3). After the test jig was gripped and
the residual slip was removed, the specimen was loaded continuously until
failure occurred. Load and deformation readings were recorded at 10 kip
intervals until the difference in deformation readings was 0.01 in. There-
after, a deformation criteria was used to control the test, and load read-
ings were taken at 0.02 in. intervals. On most of the tension specimens
the gages were not removed from the test jigs after ultimate load had
been reached.
The compression jig tests were also conducted in the hydraulic
testing machine. The test jig was placed in the center of the testing
heads with the bolt perpendicular to a line between the loading screws.
The movable head was lowered until it was in contact with the test jig,
the jig was loaded to remove residual slip, and then the load was removed.
The dial gage was then placed between the heads and initial readings were
tl!ken. Load and de-formattonreadings were recorded at 10 kip intervals
until a deformation criterion of 0.02 in. controlled the load readings.
The load was applied to both jigs so that the cross head move-• ,I .; ., .... J •.,\-- .- , ••• '
mentwas 0.1}1--1.u.- per--min. in the elastic range and 0.02 in. per min. in
the inelastic range.
Several tests of A325 bolts in tension test jigs indicated that
the loading speed had little if any effect on the load-deformation curve.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-13-
At several load increments in the. inelastic range the loading valve on
the testing machine was closed and the load was allowed to stabilize.
In most cases this took only a few minutes. It was found that the load
dropped only 1 kip in 100 kips. Thus the difference between static and
dynamic shear loading readings was negligible. All plotted points in the
figures are dynamic readings.
2.7 THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
The experimental program was formulated to measure the effect of
certain variables on the ultimate shear strength of the bolts and their
deformation at ultimate load. The testing program was influenced by
earlier work on rivets (14) (15) as well as by the behavi.or of bolts in
tests on large bolted connections(7)(8)(9).
The variables investigated were (1) type of testing device
(compression or tension jig), (2) initial bolt preload, (3) condition
of faying surfaces, (4) location of shear planes, (5) bolt grade,
(6) bolt diameter, (7) type of connected material, (8) grip and loading
span, and (9) end restraint in tension jig. These variables are dis-
cussed in turn in this section of this paper.
The first variable, the type of testing jig, influenced the
complete load-deformation curve of an A325 bolt in past tests(9).
Bolts tested in compression jigs had ultimate strengths 10% greater than
bolts tested in tension jigs. It was thought desirable to know how the
type of testing jig influences the behavior of A354 Be and A354 BD bolts.
-14-
Whether initial bolt preload, the second variable, affects the
shear strengths of bolts is an important consideration. It is generally
believed that rivet clamping force, a factor similar to bolt preload, is
removed when a rivet yields and that the ultimate shear strength of the
rivet is not effected by the clamping force(15). This paper answers the
question whether a similar assumption can be made for the bolts tested:
engineers have asked how installing a bolt by moderate torquing or by
torquing to near-failure affects its ultimate shear strength.
The third variable, the condition of the faying surfaces, was
considered because it was thought that some load could be carried by
frictional forces in the joint if all clamping forces were not removed.
The effect of friction was evaluated by comparing clean mill scale joints
with joints in which the faying surfaces had been lubricated.
The location of the shear planes, variable number four, was
thought important because the shear planes may pass through the threads
or the thread run-out. In these areas the shear strength is lower than
elsewhere along the bolt, and whether the reduction in shear strength is
proportional to the reduction in the shear area was studied.
The fifth variable, bolt grade, is obviously important. It
was known that the A490 and A354 BD bolts are stronger than the A354 Be
bolt, and that the A325 is weakest of all. However, it was of practical
interest to determine exactly how large a shear load each bolt could
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-15-
The effect on shear strength of variable number six, bolt
diameter, had been questioned in the past. Tests of rivets had shown
no consistent relationship between ultimate shear strength and rivet
diameter (15) , and it was thought desirable to determine the nature of
this relationship for bolts.
The type of connected material, the seventh variable, was
thought worthy of consideration because bolts are used to £asten a
variety of steels with dissimilar p~operties that may influence bolt
shear strength.
It was thought that shear strength might decrease with an
increase in grip length, the eighth variable. It had been demonstrated
that the ultimate strength of rivets decreases about 10% with an increase
of grip length from 1 in. to 5 in. (15). Longer rivets were thought to
be weaker because they did not fill the holes as well as shorter rivets
and because they had different strength properties than shorter rivets
because of the differences in working the material during driving.
However, the effect of grip length on bolt strength had not been deter-
mined.
The ninth and last variable, end restraint in the tension jig,
had already been studied for riveted aluminum joints(16). It was thought
desirable to know whether minimization.of lap plate prying action. in a
tension jig (to be explained later) would result in bolt shear strength
approaching that obtained in a compression jig. In a joint using several
fasteners the plates are restrained from bending freely between the in
terior fasteners and therefore cannot produce lap plate prying on any
,I!
-16-
fasteners except those at the plate ends. If this restraint in tension
jigs caused the bolts to shear at the same loads as in compression jigs,
the use of the compression jig in testing could be justified to some
extent.
Table 3 describes the bolt lots used in the study, together
with the number of bolts tested in the A7, A440, and constructional
alloy steel tension and compression jigs. The reported grip included
the nominal grip of 4 or 8 in. plus one or two 1/8 in. hardened washers.
Except for A325 bolt lots Q, R, and S, the shearing plane
passed through the full shank area and not through the thread or thread
run.;out. For bolt lots DC and FD, this requirement necessitated machin-
ing 0.16 in. and 0.20 in., respectively, off the underside of the bolt
head so that the shear planes did not pass through the threads. As far
as could be ascertained, the machining had no adverse effect upon the
bolt behavior. 36 A354 bolts were tested in tension jigs and 39 A354
bolts were tested in compression jigs. In addition, 69 A325 bolts were
tested in compression jigs and 3 A325 bolts were tested in tension jigs.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-17-
The special studies conducted on A325 bolts are sununarized in
Table 7. This includes tests of bolts with the shear planes through
the threads or thread run-out and the tests comparing normal mill scale
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The double shear test results are given in Tables 4 and 5 for
the compression jig and tension jig tests, respectively. The ultimate
strength and fracture load values are given in kips; the deformations
are reported in inches. Average load and deformation values were com-.
puted at ultimate and fracture loads. The bolt grades include A325,
A354 BC, A354 BD, and A490 high-sttength.
The shear test results for the compression and tension jigs
are sununarized in Table 6. Included are mean values of the shear
strength and the deformation at ultimate load of bolts tested in A440
and constructional alloy steel jigs. The shear stress was obtained by
dividing the ultimate load by the appropriate shear area. For the bolts
whose shear planes did not pass through the shank, the shear stress was
obtained by dividing the load by the actual shear area. When both shear
planes passed through the shank, twice the nominal shank area was used.
When one shear plane passed through the thread run-out, the run-out
diameter was measured and the area computed and added to the shank area.
If one shear plane passed through the fully threaded portion of the bolt,
the nominal root area was added to the shank area. When both shear
planes passed through the fully threaded portion, twice the root area was
added.
A N A L Y SISANDRES U L T S3. T EST
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I-18-
Ifaying surfaces with lubricated mill scale faying surfaces. I
The bolt tensile strengths given in Table 8 are based on
the ulti~ate tensile load obtained from direct tensiontests(l) and Ithe stress area. The bolt tensile strengths were used to compute the
minimum shear strengths given in Table 8 for bolts tested in A440 and
constructional alloy steel jigs. These minimum shear strengths were
II
where ~ is the minimum bolt tensile strength as specified in ASTM'svmin
L min =
III
(1)
The actual bolt tensile strengths cr- tareacA325, A354, and A490.
computed on the basis of the formula:
G';in
(jact
results on full-size bolts.
given in .Table 8 and were computed on the basis of the tensile test
The ultimate shear strength l:" is theact Idouble shear strength of a single fastener in either a tension or a com-
pression jig.
The following average minimum shear strengths for the three
II
types of bolts tested were computed .without regard to the type of
connected material because it had no effect upon the ultimate shear Istrength. As would be expected, the tension jig test gave the lowest Ivalues for minimum shear strength. The minimum shear strengths for
A325, A354 Be, and A354 BD (or A490) bolts tested in tension jigs was I76.7 ksi, 78.7 ksi, and 91.9 ksi respectively. However, for the same
bolt grades ~ested in compression jigs, the minimum shear strengths Iwere 86.5 ksi, 86.8 ksi and 102.8 ksi respectively. I
II
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIII
;-19-
The deformation of the fasteners in the tensio~ jigs as
reported in Table 5 included the effects of shearing, bending, and
bearing deformation of .the bolts as .well as the .localizedbearing de-
formation of the main ~nd lap plates •..For the compression jigs, the
. deformation measurement included, in addition to the aforementioned
deformations, axial deformation of the test jig and deformation with-
in the testing machine. One test was conducted with the gages mounted
on the compression jig in a manner similar to that of the'tension jig •.
Figure 5 shows the load-deformation curves for the DC lot'bolts tested
in the two groups of compression jigs. It can be seen that the deforma-
tion at ultimate load is less for the bolt tested in the specially-
instrumented compr~ssion j~g than for the bolt tested in the normal
compression jig.
Figure 6 illustrates A325 bolts at various stages of loading •.
The stress-deformation curve shows the points at which loading of the
compression jig was stopped and the jig was removed to be sawed in,
half. The first three .stages show little visible deformation. How-
ever, stages 4, 5, and 6 show an increasing amount of sheCjlr, bending,
and bearing deformation, as can be seen from the photographs in Fig. 6.
The photographs show that the plate bearing deformations were greater.
near the shear plane.
As was expected, the type of bolt head (regular or heavy) had
no appreciable effect on the shear strength of single bolts in double
shear.
-20-
.3.2 EFFECT OF TESTING DEVICE
The influence of the type of testing device on the ultimate
shear strength and deformation at ultimate load is illustrated in
Fig. 7, where typical mean stress-deformation curves for bolts of the
same lot tested in both tension and compression jigs are compared.
Both Fig. 7 and the summary in Table 6 show that the ultimate shear
strength of bolts tested in tension jigs is lower than that of bolts
tested in compression jigs.
Considering all of the test results, the ultimate shear
strength for bolts tested in A440 steel tension jigs is 6% to 13% lower
than that obtained in A440 steel compression jigs. This same trend was
observed in the constructional alloy steel jigs, where the reduction in
strength varied. from 8% to 13%. In general, the deformation at ulti
mate load can not be compared because different deformation measuring
systems were used. However, one DC lot bolt was tested in a compression
jig instrumented in a similar manner as the tension jig (see Fig. ?).
The deformation at ultimate load for this bolt was 0.224 in. almost
identical to that of DC lot bolts tested in a tension jig. Thus, the
deformation within the testing machine itself due to compressive forces
is appreciable.
The lower shear strength of a bolt tested in a tension jig is
due to lap plate prying action, a phenomenon which tends to bend the lap
plates of the tension jig outward.. The lap plate prying mechanism is
shown in Fig. 8. Due to the uneven bearing deformations of the test bolt,
the resisting force P/2 does not act at the centerline of the lap plate,
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIII
.. -21-
but acts at a distance "e" to the left of it. This sets up a clockwise.
moment ~ = P/2(e) which tends to bend the lap plate away from the main
plate. This moment is resisted by the tensile force ~T in the bolt.
Catenary action may also contribute to the increase in bolt
tension near ultimate load. However, it is believed that this effect
is small. in comparison to the tension induced by lap plate prying. In
any case, the catenary effect is present in both the tension and com-
pression jigs.
If, for the sake of illustration, Mise's Yield Criterion is
extended to ultimate conditions, it can be shown that:II 0- 2
u= + k
2 T... u(2)
IIIIIIIIII
where ~ = ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
~ = tensile stress component
i u = shear stress component at ultimate load
k = a constant
If this equation must be satisfied, it follows that if o-t increases
due to I1T, the ultimate shear stress Lu must necessarily decrease
because (J is a constant for a given bolt lot. Hence the lower shearu
strength for bolts tested in tension jigs is to be expected.
Lap plate prying action in tension tests has been observed in
the past. Tests of large bolted joints have shown that the bolt under
the highest combined tension and shear stress will be the first bolt in
the joint to fail (17). Also, the lap plate prying action is visible in
these· large joint tests as can be seen in Refs. 8 and 9. Tests reported
-22-
in Ref. 10 of bolts under combined tension and shear have indicated that
the tensile component does reduce the ultimate shear strength of the
fastener.
3.3 EFFECT OF INITIAL BOLT PRELOAD
The effect of initial bolt preload on shear strength is
illustrated in Figs. 9 and 10 for A325 and A490 bolts respectively.
Two different grades of bolts were tested. Lot 8B consisted of A325
bolts with heavy heads and short thread lengths. The A490 bolts
(lot KK) had dimensions similar to the 8B lot bolts. All compression
shear jigs of these bolts had a 4 in. grip and both shearing planes
passed through the bolt shank. The pre loads were induced by turning
the nut against the resistance of the gripped material. The faying
surfaces were clean mill scale and all bolts were from the same lot.
The A325 bolts were elongated to either a "snug" preload
(about 8 kips), ~ turn-of-nut, or 1~ turn-of-nut. The A490 bolts
(see Fig. 10) were tested at "snug" preload, ~ turn-of-nut, and 1 turn
of-nut. The torqued tension calibration curves for the 8Band KK lot
bolts are given in the upper portion of Figs. 9 and 10 respectively.
These curves were established by torquing bolts in a commercial bolt
calibrator with 1/8 in. of thread in the grip. Both the bolt tension
and bolt elongation were measured as described in Refs. 1 and 2. The
lower portions of Figs. 9 and 10 show the relationship between bolt
shear strength and initial preload as determined from measured bolt
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
-23-
elongations. The figures show that there is no consistent variation of
ultimate shear strength with initial bolt preload •. The variation in
mean shear strengths for the different magnitudes of induced preload
was almost the same as the variation in the individual bolt shear strengths
for a given preload.
A number of explanations may be advanced for these results.
When a bolt is torqued to a certain preload, most of the inelastic de-
formations develop in the threaded portion of the bolt and not in the
shank, and all failure planes in these bolts were through the bolt
shanks. One would therefore expect the internal bolt tension to have
little influence on the shear strength.
Furthermore, measurements of the internal tension in bolts in
stalled in large joints have indicated(17) that at ultimate load there is
little initial clamping force remaining in the bolt. Any tension intro-
duced into the bolt by lap plate prying action would be present regard-
less of initial tension. Studies of bolts under combined tension and
shear show that tensile forces up to 20 - 30 percent of the tensile
, (10)strength do not greatly effect the shear strength 0
3.4 CONDITION OF THE FAYING SURFACES
Tests with two different types of surface conditions were con-
ducted using two different lots of A325 bolts. 27 compression jigs were
tested for each bolt lot, 9 with clean mill scale faying surfaces and
18 with lubricated surfaces. The results of these tests are summarized
-24-
in Table 7, and details of the individual tests are given in Ref. 18.
The condition of the faying surface had a slight influence
on the ultimate shear strength. The mean test values given in Table 7
show that bolts tested in lubricated jigs had shear strengths which
were 2 to 5% lower than those tested in clean mill scale jigs.
Because displacement readings were not taken during all tests
it is impossible to compare the mean load-deformation curves. However,
Fig. 11 shows typical results of two tests and clearly indicates that
test jigs with lubricated faying surfaces produced lower shear strengths
and greater flexibility than those with clean mill scale surfaces.
Apparently, there is a certain amount of load transfer through friction
in the compression test jig.
3.5 LOCATION OF THE SHEAR PLANES
The shear resistance of the high strength bolts is directly
affected by the available shear area. Four different combinations of
shear areas are possible: (1) both shear planes through the shank;
(2) one shear plane through the shank, the other through the thread
runout; (3) one shear plane through the shank, the other through the
threads; and (4) both shear planes through the threads. Twelve' shear
tests of A325 bolts, 3 tests for each of 4 possible sh~a:r~i:i1'ahe: c-ofu.:~,r
binations, were conducted in compression jigs in an effort to ascertain
the relative influence of shear plane locations on shear strength and
deformation of a bolt.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-25-
The influence of the shear plane location on the ultimate shear
strength is illustrated by the test results in Table 7 and Fig. 12 for
lots T, Q, R, and S which correspond to the four different shear combina
tions respectively. When both shear planes passed through the bolt
shanks, the highest average shear strength and deformation capacity were
obtained, the shear strength being about-70% of the tensile strength.
When both shear planes passed through the threaded portion and calcula
tions were based on the root area, the lowest average shear strength and
deformation were obtained, the shear strength being about 60% of the
tensile strength. The values for specimens with one shear plane through
the threads were close to those for specimens with both planes through
the threads. When one plane passed through the shank and the other through
the thread r~n-out, the average shear stre~gth lay bet~een the two limiting
values defined by the shear strength of the threads and the shank.
3.6 EFFECT OF BOLT GRADE
The effect of bolt grade is illustrated in Table 6 by a com
parison of the test data for the different grades of bolts. Figure 13
contains typical stress-deformation curves for lots CC and ED of A354
bolts and, for comparison, lot 8B of A325 bolts. All bolts were tested
in 4 in. A440 steel tension jigs. As was expected from a knowledge of
the material properties of the bolts, the double shear strengths of the
A354 BC and A354 BD (or A490) bolts were higher than the double shear
strengths of the A325 bolts •.
( )
-26-
The data in Table 6 shows that the double shear strength was
72% of the tensile strength for·A325 bolts, 63% for A354 BC bolts and
61% for A354 BD bolts (A490).
A comparison of the failures of the three types of fasteners
is shown in Fig. 14. Comparing the ends of the tested bolts which are
still intact reveals that there is an apparent decrease in the relative
shear displacement with increasing bolt strength. This would confirm
the hypothesis that the A325 bolts have more shear deformation capacity
than either the A354 or the A490 boits. However, as was noted earlier
and can be seen visually in Fig. 6, the deformation of the bolts depends
not only on the relative shearing displacement but also on the bending
and bearing deformations in the bolt and in the connected plate material.
Because of the relative increase in the shear strength, it was expected. .' .
that, for a given connected material, the plate bearing deformations for
the A490 bolts would be greater than for the A325 bolts. As a result,
the total deformations for the three grades of bolts do not differ as
much as one might expect. For the three bolt lots shown in Fig. 14,
the total deformations at ultimate load were. 0.183 in., 0.178 in., and
0.174 in. for the A325, A354 BC, and A354 BD bolts, respectively. Simi-
lar results were obtained for the other bolt lots and testing conditions.
3.7 EFFECT OF BOLT DIAMETER
The influence of diameter on the ,shear-deformation relationship
was determined by tension and compression shear tests on 7/8 in. and 1 in.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
-27-
bolts. The test data in Tables 4, 5, and 6 shows that 7/8 in. bolts and
1 in. bolts of the same grade have nearly identical shear strengths (ksi).
Thus, the data indicates that bolt diameter has no appreciable effect on
shear strength.
Figure 15 is a typical stress-deformation curve for 7/8 in. and
1 in. A354 BD bolts tested in A440 steel tension jigs. The figure shows
that there is no appreciable difference in the shear strengths but that
the total deformation for the 1 in. bolt is greater than that for the
7/8 in. bolt. The rate of increase of bearing area is only 14% while
the rate of increase of shear area is 30%. Thus higher bearing stresses
and greater bearing deformations occur for the 1 in. bolt than for the
7/8 in. bolt. Therefore, the deformation at ultimate load of a 1 in.
bolt was greater than that of a 7/8 in. bolt when the plate thicknesses
were identical.
3.8 EFFECT OF CONNECTED MATERIAL
The effect of connected material on the ultimate shear strength
and deformation is illustrated by the data in Tables 4 and 5 for bolts
that have been tested in both A440 and constructional alloy steel jigs.
Figure 16 is a typical shear-deformation curve showing the effect of
this variable. It can be seen that the ultimate shear strengths are very
ne~rly the same, but the total deformation for the bolt tested in the A440
steel jig is 0.116 in. greater, almost twice as large as the deformation
of the same bolt tested in the constructional alloy steel jig.
-28-
The test data shows that for a particular type of fastener the
variation in shear strength due to the type of connected material is no
greater than the difference in shear strengths between the different
bolt lots for that type of fastener. Thus the test data indicates that
the type of connected material has no influence on the ultimate shear
strength.
3.9 EFFECT OF GRIP AND LOADING SPAN
Research on A14l steel rivets showed that an increase in grip
length reduced the shear strength(lS). This reduction was due mainly to
stresses caused by the greater bending of the longer rivets. Also,
differences in the working of the rivet material during driving contri-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-29-
buted to the reduction of ultimate shear strength. Consideration of
these facts about A14l steel rivets led to the thought that an increase
in grip length might possibly influence the shear strength of a high
strength bolt.
The effect. of grip.length was investigated by comparing the
behavior of a bolt installed in a 4 in. grip ~est jig (see Figs. 2a and
2b) to that of a bolt installed in an 8 in. grip test jig. The 8 in.
tension and compression jigs were made by adding two 1 in. plates to
the lap plates of the jig and two 1 in. plates to the main plates. In
this manner, the ratio of loading span to·grip was kept constant at
1:2. It should be noted, however, that this test jig configuration
introduced·two test variables, the total grip length and the loading
span length.
The effect of loading span and grip length on the shear-de
formation relationsh1p for A440 steel tension jigs is illustrated in
Fig. 18. The results shown are typical regardless of the type6f:test
jig or types of connected material. The differences in the shear
strength and deformation at ultimate load were negligible. Within the
elastic and initially plastic portion of the load-deformation curve,
the behavior of the 8 in. grip bolts was nearly the same as that of the
4 in. grip bolts.
-30-
3.10 EFFECT OF END RESTRAINT
In a large bolted joint which contains many fasteners, the
lap plates are restrained from bending freely between the interior
fasteners. Therefore, it was thought desirable to determine what
effect the restraint of the free ends of the lap plates had on the
IIIII
shear strength and deformation of single bolted joints. Similar studies
h b d t d . d 1'· .. (16)ave een con uc e on r~vete a um~numJo~nts • If some way could Ibe found to eliminate the lap plate prying" action in a tension jig, the
shear strength of a bolt tested in this manner should approach the shear
strength of the same lot of bolts tested in a compression jig. Special
tests were conducted in an effort to determine the importance of lap
plate prying and to determine why the tension test jig tests yielded
shear strengths 8 to 13% lower than those obtained in a compression 'jig.
In tests of large bolted joints(8)(9)J it was visually evident
that only the end fasteners at the lap plate are subjected to lap plate
prying. Hence, the interior bolts in large joints may behave in a manner
similar to that of a bolt installed in a compression jig.
The special tension jig shown in Fig. 19 was used to eliminate
lap plate prying. Bolt "A" was installed in a slotted hole and carried
none of the shear load, its only function being to keep the lap plates
from bending outward. The initial tension of this bolt was small in
order to minimize the frictional load transfer.
Three special tension jigs fabricated from A440 steel were used
to test three A325 bolts from Lot 8B. The results of these tests are com-
pared in Fig. 19 with the average shear stress-deformation curve for the
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-31-
8B lot bolts tested in compression jigs and standard tension jigs. This
figure shows that the shear strength for a bolt tested in a special ten
sion jig from which lap plate prying is eliminated approaches the shear
strength of a bolt tested in a compression jig. This result could be
expected if one considers Eq. 2. In the special te~sion jig, the ten
sile stress art due to lap plate prying action is about zero. Thus the
only tensile force is that induced by the catenary action which is pre
sent in both jigs.
-32-
(1) The type of bolt head (heavy or regular) had no signifi
cant effect on the shear strength or deformation at ultimate load.
(5) Compression test jigs with lubricated faying surfaces had
slightly lower shear strengths than those with clean mill scale faying
surfaces.
(3) The amount of initially induced bolt preload, as deter
mined by measuring .the bolt elongation, did not influence the ultimate
shear $trength of either A325 or A490 bolts (Figs. 9, 10).
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
CON C L U 51 0 N SAND4. 5 U M MAR Y
The following conclusions are based on the results of 147
tests of 7/8 in. and 1 in. high strength A325, A354 BC; A354 BD, and
A490 bolts installed in test jigs which subjected the bolts to double
shear.
(6) The shear strength of A354 BD and A490 bolts is 16%
greater than the shear strength of A354 BC bolts and 25% greater than
A325 bolts (Fig. 13).
(2) The ultimate shear strength ofA354 BD and A490 bolts
tested in tension jigs was, on the average, 10% lower than the same
bolts tested in compression jigs. Comparable reductions in shear strength
may be obtained for A354 BC and A325 bolts. The actual bolt deformations
at ultimate load were not affected by the type of testing device (Fig. 7).
(4) The ultimate shear strength of an A325 bolt based on the
root diameter was reduced 14% when one or both shear planes pass through
the threads.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-33-
(7) There was no apparent influence of bolt diameter on the
shear strength for the diameters considered. However, because the bolt
shearing area increases faster than the bolt bearing area, the deforma
tions at ultimate load are greater for the 1 in. bolt than for the 7/8 in.
bolt (Fig. 15).
(8) The type of connected material had little or no influence
on the shear strength. However, the higher the yield point of the
connected material, the lower the plate bearing deformations (Fig. 16).
(9) For a grip-loading span ratio of 2,1, the grip and load
ing span had no significant effect on the shear strength or deformation
at ultimate load for either A325 or A354 BD bolts (Fig. 18).
(10) When lap plate prying action in a tension jig was mini
mized, the shear strength of bolts tested in tension jigs approaches
the shear strength of bolts tested in compression jigs (Fig. 19).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ,-
The investigation reported herein was conducted at Fritz
Engineering Laboratory,Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsy1v~riia.
Professor William J. Eney is Head of the Civil Engineering Depart
ment and of the Laboratory and Dr. Lynn S. Beedle is Director of
the Laboratory. The Pennsylvania Departme~t of Highways, the De
partment of Commerce - Bureau of Public Roads, and the American In
stitute of Steel Construction jointly sponsored the research project.
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dr. Lynn
S. Beedle for helpful suggestions and constructive criticism. Sincere
appreciation is also due ,Messrs. Richard Christopher and Gordon Sterling
for their help during ,the testing program. Russell, Burdsall & Ward
Bolt and Nut Co. and Bethlehem Steel CO_,are also to be thanked for
supplying the bolts used in this study.
Special thanks are due to Mr. K. Harpel, Laboratory Foreman,
for his coope~ation during the testing program; to Mr. H. Izquierdo
for preparing the drawings; to Miss Valerie Austin for typing the manu
script with great care; and to Mr. William Dige1 for reviewing the
manuscript.
The authors also wish to acknowledge the guidance and advice
of Committee 10, Research Council on Riveted and Bolted Structural
Joints under the chairmanship of Dr. J. L. Rumpf.
-34-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 1
0.505" COUPON TEST RESULTS
0.505" Bolt % %Bolt Bolt No.of Tensile' Tensile E1ong. Reduct.Grade Lot Dia~ . Tests Strength Strength in 2"+ in area-
AC 7/8 3 140. 3ks~, 140.8ksi 21.2 57.2..... :,COI ~, .
A354 BC CC 7/8 3 133.0. 134.8 21.6 62.2
DC 1 3 131.6 137.0 22.6 63.1
ED 7/8 3 164.9 168.3 16.6 59.1
A354~BD FD 1 3 149.8 163.8 16.7 58.1
GD 1'/8 3 160.9 163.3 18.8 58.1
,.' ,
7/8A490 KK 3 153.4 168.6 20.0 55.5-8B 7/8 3 106.8 115.2 21.0 -
Q,R,S,T 7/8 3 121. 7 116.5 20.7 -A325 y 1 3 123.6 120.6 22.3 -
: 'z 7/8 3 112.9 130.7 19.7 -
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NUT
Table 2
BOLT DESCRIPTIONT
BOLT
Width Thread WidthBolt Length Across Height Length Across HeightGrade Lot Dia. L F1ats,F H T F1ats,W J
A354 BC AC 7/8 5-k 1-7/16 35/64 1~ 1-7/16 55/64
A354 BC CC 7/8 5-k 1-5/16 35/64 2 1-5/16 3/4I i
A354 BC DC 1 5~ 1~ 39/64 2-k 1~ 55/64
A354 BD ED 7/8 5~ 1-5/16 35/64 2 1-5/16 3/4
A354 BD FD 1 5~ 1~ 39/64 2-k 1~ 55/64
A354 BD GD 7/8 9~ 1-5/16 35/64 2~ 1-5/16 3/4
A490 KK 7/8 5~ 1-7/16 35/64 1~ 1-7/ 16 55/64
A490 JJ 1 5~ 1-5/8 39/64 1-3/4 1-5/8 63/64
A325 8B 7/8 5~ 1-7/16 35/64 1~ 1-7/16 55/64
A325 Q 7/8 5~ 1-5/16 35/64 2-k 1-5/16 3/4
A325 I R 7/8 5~ 1-5/16 35/64 3-k 1-5/16 3/4,
A325 S 7/8 5~ 1-5/16 35/64 5~ 1-5/16 3/4
A325 T 7/8 6~ 1-5/16 35/64 2-k 1-5/16 3/4
A325 y 1 5~ 1~ 35/64 2-k 1~ 55/64
A325 Z 7/8 5~ 1-5/16 35/64 2 1-5/16 3/4
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 3
THE TESTING PROGRAM
Length Jig s T e s t e d
Bolt; Under Thread A440 A440 Q & T Q & T A7*Grade Lot Dia. Head· Head Length Grip Camp. Tens. Camp. Tens. Camp.
AC 7/8 H 5\ l~ 4-1/8 3 - 3 - -
A354 BC CC 7/8 R 5\ 2 4\ 3 3 3 3 - .
DC 1 RO5~ 2\ 4-1/8 3 3 3 3 . -
ED 7/8 R 5~ 2 4\ 3 3 3 3 -
A354 BD FD 1 RO
5~ 2\ 4-1/8 3 3 3 3 -
GD 7/8 R 9~ 2\ 8\ 3 3 3 3 -
KK 7/8 H 5~ l~ 4-1/8· 3 3 - - -A490
JJ 1 H 5~ 1-3/4 4-1/8 ! - - - 3 -
8B 7/8 H 5~ l~ 4-1/8 3 3 - - -
Q 7/8 R 5~ 2\+ 4 - - - - 3
R 7/8 R 5~ 3.lz;++ 4 - - - - 3
A325 S 7/8 R 5~ 5~-t+t 4 - - - - 3
T 7/8 R 6~ 2\ 4-3/4 - - - - 3
y 1 R 5~ 2\ 4 - -I
- - 27
Z 7/8 R 5~ 2 4 - 27- - , -i
Note: Shear planes passed through the full shank except where noted.
* H - Heavy Head, R - Regular Head, 0 - Machined to avoid shear planethrough thread run-out •.
+ One shear plane through thread run-out.
++ One shear plane through threads.
+++ Two shear planes through threads.
Table 4
INDIVIDUAL BOLT TEST RESULTSFOR COMPRESSION JIGS
Ultimate Deform Fracture DeformBolt Lot Bolt Strength, at U1t., Load, at Fractureand No. Dia. Steel kips inches kips inches -1. A354 BC Bolts
AC-12 7/8 A440 119.4 .2465 92 .265AC- 2 7/8 A440 114.0 .2141 50 .270AC-32 7/8 A440 114.5 .2044 82 .245
Ave. AC 7/8 A440 116.0 .2217 75 .260-------AC-25 7/8 Q & T 119.3 .1662 80 .195AC-18 7/8 Q & T 119.3 .1662 80 .195AC- 4 7/8 Q & T 117.3 .1647 100 .224
Ave. AC 7/8 o & T 115~6 .1583 86 .199
CC-37 7/8 A440 112.5 .2024 90 .216CC-1 7/8 A440 120.3 .2174 80 .258CC-15 7/8 A440 118.1 .2232 104 .243
Ave. CC 7/8 A440 117.0 .2143 91 .239
CC- 3 7/8 Q & T 108.6 .1561 72 .192CC-31 7/8 Q & T 110.9 .1610 50 .211CC-19 7/8 Q & T 109.8 .1651 66 .200
Ave. CC 7/8 Q & T 109.8 .1607 63 .201
DC-28 1 A440 148.6 .2599 124 .276DC-35 1 A440 150.5 .2400 120 .277DC-12 1 A440 144.8 .2290 120 .260
Ave. DC 1 A440 147.9 .2429 121 ~27i
DC- 9 1 Q & T 152.3 .1765 128 .207DC-11 1 Q & T 142.2 .1600 89 .211DC-10 1 Q & T 161.0 .1700 141 .194
- - _ ...
Ave. DC 1 Q & T 151.8 • 1688 119 .204
2. A354 BD bolts
ED-20 7/8 A440 128.8 .1796 115 .199ED- 1 7/8 A440 132.7 .1934 93 .260ED-ll 7/8 A440 134.2 .1700 124 .180
Ave. ED 7/8 A440 131.2 .1810 111 .213
ED- 3 7/8 Q & T 145.7 .1530 136 .165ED- 7 7/8 Q & T 141.1 .1435 128 .160ED-30 7/8 Q -& T 130.7 .1480 121 .157
Ave. ED 7/8 Q & T 139.2 .1482 128 .161
FD- 2 1 A440 177 .4 .2100 161 .225FD- 3 1 A440 181.0 .2300 160 .250FD- 9 1 A440 183.3 .2480 160 .267
Ave. FD 1 A440 180.6 .2293 160 .247
FD-14 1 Q & T 176.6 .1642 168 .177FD-29 1 Q & T 169.3 .1768 153 .196FD-20 1 Q & T 179.0 .1870 160 .205
Ave. FD 1 Q & T 174.9 .1760 160 .193
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
i
l'I
Table 4 (cont'd)
-Ultimate Deform Fracture Deform
Bolt Lot Bolt Strength, at U1t., Load, at Fractureand No. Dia. Steel kips inches kips inches
GD- 8 7/8 A440 139.3 .1989 120 .225GD-40 7/8 A440 133.7 .1852 125 .198GD-22 7/8 A440 131. 7 .2036 120 .225
Ave. GD 7/8 A440 134.9 .1959 122 .216
GD- 6 7/8 Q & T 146.6 .1359 133 .162GD-28 7/8 Q & T 137.3 .1650 126 .179GD-20 7/8 Q & T 136.8 .1490 131 .157
Ave. GD 7/8 Q & T 140.2 .1500 130 .166
3. A490 Bolts
IKK-34 7/8 A440 137.5 .2744 90 -KK-63 7/8 A440 140.0 .2662 125 .286
I KK-14 7/8 A440 135.0 .2479 108 -Ave. KK 7/8 A440 137.5 .2628 108 .286
4. A325 Bolts
8B-29 7/8 A440 102.9 .262 42 .2928B-34 7/8 A440 103.2 .228, 80 .242
I 8B-137 7/8 A440 105.9 .260 85 .283_.
Ave. 8B 7/8 A440 104.0 .250 72 .272
T-17 7/8 A7 110.2 .259 95 .304T-25 7/8 A7 111.6 .279 90 .322T-26 7/8 A7 109.1 .250 85 .271
Ave. T 7/8 A7 110.3 .263 90 .299...-
Q- 2 7/8 A7 95.7+ .213 - -Q- 3 7/8 A7 93.3+ .189 - -Q-11 7/8 A7 99~6+ .265 - -Ave. Q 7/8 A7 .99.2+ .222 - -'--"-'--'.'-'-'--R- 5 7/8 A7 85.0++ .164 65 .282R- 8 7/8 A7 81.1++ .150 - -R-12 7/8 A7 81.6++ .156 - -Ave. R 7/8 A7 82.6++ .157 65 .282
S- 9 7/8 A7 63.2+++ .107 - -S-lO 7/8 A7 68.5+++ .131 63.6 .145S-14 7/8 A7 70.5+++ .123 60.0 .140
Ave. S 7/8 A7 67.4+1+ .120 61.8 .142
+ One shear plane through thread run-out.
++ One shear plane through threads.
+++ Two shear planes through threads.
Table 5
INDIVIDUAL BOLT TEST RESULTSFOR TENSION JIGS
Ultimate Deform Frac.ture DeformBolt Lot Bolt Strength, a't Ult., Load, at Fractureand No. Dia. Steel kips inches kips inches
1. A354 BC Bolts
CC-13 7/8 A440 102.8 .1781 93 .205CC-27 7/8 A440 104.9 .1904 100 .201CC-10 7/8 A440 103.5 .165.8 90 .185
Ave. CC 7/8 A440 103.7 .1781 94 .197
CC-11 7/8 Q & T 101.2 .1432 89 .157CC-28 7/8 Q & T 101.3 .1433 87 .168CC-20 7/8 Q & T 100.9 .1248 83 .160
Ave. CC 7/8 Q & T 101.1 .1371 86 .162
DC-39 1 A440 138.5 .2135 133 .233DC- 4 1 A440 140.4 .1950 130 .205DC-16 1 A440 135.8 .2284 125 .245
Ave ..· DC 1 A440 138.2 .2123 129 .228
DC-38 1 Q & T 130.7 .1488 118 .181DC- 7 1 Q & T 132.5 .1632 122 .179DC-36 1 Q & T 131.2 .1572 120 .213
Ave. DC 1 Q & T 131.5 .1564 122 .191
2. A354 BD Bolts
ED-32 7/8 A440 124.5 .1800 113 .200ED-24 7/8 A440 123.2 .1677 108 . .221ED-12 7/8 A440 124.0 .1732 115 .203
Ave.· ED 7/8 A440 123.9 .1736 112 .208
ED-10 7/8 Q & T 128.8 .1192 103 .160ED-35 7/8 Q & T 120.0 .1165 115 .128ED-29 7/8 Q & T 120.7 .1033 101 .142
Ave. ED 7/8 Q & T 123.2 .1130 106 .143
FD-13 1 A440 151.2 .2474 130 .279FD-5 1 A440 156.3 .2557 132 .292FD-27 1 A440 165.7 .2233 152 .252
Ave. FD 1 A440 157.7 .2476 138 .274
FD-31 1 Q & T 160.7 . .1357 155 .145FD-28 1 Q & T 152.0 .1327 143 .162FD:-30 1 Q & T 157.5 .1253 145 ' .150
Ave. FD 1 Q & T 156.6 .1312 148 .152
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1I,'
Table 5 (cont'd)
Ultimate Deform Fracture DeformBolt Lot Bolt I Strength, at U1t., Load, at Fractureand No. Dia. Steel kips inches kips inches
GD-39 7/8 " A440 120.5 .1706 112 ,.190GD-37 7/8 A440 - .1836 - , -GD-26 7/8 A440 124.2 .1632 110 .195
Ave. Gl) 7/8"
A440 122.2 .1725 III .. 192
GD-11 7/8 Q & T 123.5 .1408 - -GD~ 6 7/8 Q & T 122.5 .1377 - -GD-26 7/8 Q & T 124.3 .1760 - -Ave,. GD 7/8 Q& T 123.4 .1515 - -3. A490 Bolts
KK-38 7/8 A440 124.0 .2008 110 -KK-35 7/8 A440 125.1 .2139 120 -KK-54 7/8 A440 124.2 .1910 115 -Ave. KK 7/8 A440 124.4 .2019 115 -JJ-14 1 Q & T 151.2 .1703 148 .215JJ-52 1 Q &T 149.0 .1491 145 .160JJ-1 1 Q & T 154.9 .1448 - -Ave. JJ 1 Q & T 151. 7 .1547 147 .188
/
4. A325 Bolts
8B-109 7/8 A440 94.0 .2000 75 -8B-12 7/8 A440 90.0 .1730 74 .1818B-188 7/8 A440 93.3 .1760 76 .195
Ave. 8B 7/8 A440 92.4 .1830 75 188
Table 6
Summary of Test Results
T J'Compress~on J~ ens~on ~g
Bolt Ultimate Shear Deform. At Ultimate Shear Deform. At
Grade Lot Dia. Stress. ksi Ultimate inches Stress, ksi Ultimate, inches'
A440 Q & T Avg. A440 Q & T ~440 Q & T ~vg. A440 Q & T
AC 7/8 96.6 96.4 96.5 .2217 .1583 - - - - -A354BC CC 7/8 97.3 91.3 94.3 .2143 .1607 86.3 84.2 85.2 .1781 .1371
DC 1 94.2 96.6 95.4 .2429 .1688 88.0 83.7 85.9 .2123 .1564
ED 7/8 110.0 116.0 113.0 .1810 .1482 103. -' 102. I 103.0 .1136 .1130
A354BD FD 1 115.0 111.4 113.2 ~2293 .1760 100. 99.7 100.0 .2476 .1312'
GD 7/8 112.3 116.8 114.1 .1959 .1500 102.0 102. <; 102.5 .1725 .1515
KK 7/8 114.5 - 114.5 .2628 - 103.8 - 103.8 .2019 -A490
JJ 1 96.5 96.5 .1547- - - - - - -
A325 8B 7/8 86.7 - 86.7 .250 - 76.9 - 76.9 .1830 -
Note: All the stresses and deformations are the average of three tests.
-------------------
IIII:1IIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 7
SUMMARY OF SPECIAL TESTS OF A325 BOLTS*
! i
ILocationUlt. !
~
Faying Shear Deform jBolt Dia. Grip No. Surface of Shear Stress, atGrade Lot in. in. Test Condition Planes ksi Ult. in.
-r-T 7/8 4-3/4 ! 3 Mill Scale Shank 91.7 0.250
i ,
Q 7/8 4 3 Mill Scale Shank & 84.8 0.223ThreadRun-out
R 7/8 4 3 Mill Scale Shank & 77.7 0.158Threads
A325 S 7/8 4 3 Mill Scale Threads 72.9 0.123
Z 7/8 4 9 Mill Scale Shank 93.2 -
Z 7/8 4 18 Lubricated Shank 88.2 -y 1 4 9 Mill Scale Shank 81.6 -y I 1
,4 18 Lubricated Shank 79.4! -
I ,
* Tests conducted in A7 stee10mpreSSi~jigs.
* Based on tests of full size bolts. The tensile strength was computed asP/As where:As ';" 0~7854(D.:.0-.9743) ~
nA = tensile stress area
s
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
hh
\I~ Table 8
~OLT SHEAR STRENGTHS
n = threads per inch
P = average ultimate tensile strength
D,=-nomina1 bolt diameter
Ml.nl.mum Sear Strengt s Ksl..Bolt
Compress~on Jig Tension JigBolt TensileGrade Lot Dia. Strength"'- A440 Q & T Avg. A440 Q & T Avg.
AC 7/8 140.8ksi. 85.9 85.5 85.7 - - -
A354 BC CC 7/8 134.8 90.2 84.6 87.4 80.0 78.0 79.0
DC 1 137.0 85.9 88.0 87.0 80.5 76.4 78.4
ED 7/8 168.3 98.0 103.2 100.6 92.0 91.4 91".7
A354 BD FD 1 163.8 105.3 102.0 103.7 91.9 91.3 91.6
GD 7/8 163.3 103.0 107.0 105.0 93.5 94.5 94 .. 0
KK 7/8 168.6 102.0 - 102.0 .92.1 - 92.1A490 --
JJ 1 163.5 - - - - 88.7 88.7
A325 8B 7/8 115.2 86.5 - - 86.5 76 .. 7 - 76.7
Test Bolt
141 Rivet
(b)
p
0.10 0.20 0.30
DEFORMATION, INCHESTypical Shear-Deformation Curves for A141Steel Rivet, A325 and A490 Bolts
P
Schematic of Testing Jigs for Single Bolts
(a)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
40
80
o
120
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Fig. 4 Compression Jig Set-Up andInstrumentation
IIIIIIII
Fig. 3 Tension Jig Set-Up andInstrumentation I
Effect of Deformations within the CompressionJig Assembly on the Deformation at Ultimate Load
DEFORMATION, INCHES
Normal CompressionJig Test
I
III
I
II
III
.28
o
.24.20
CompressionTest
.16.12.08.04
Fig. 5
o
100
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
.28
.20
.20.16
Compression Jig
.12
DEFORMATION, INCHES
DEFORMATION, INCHES
Deformation of A325 Bolts at Various Stages of Loading
o 0 _g_-o..O 0 -0- -0-0 0 0 c:r-o'o
-0- 0 0 "0o _o~o '-0--0 C)
o 6"'0 A440 Tension Jig
:;'-0
Typical Shear-Deformation Curves for A354 BCBolts Tested in Tension and Compression Jigs
A325 Bolts88 Lot
A440 Compression Jig
60
100
40
Fig. 6
o
Fig. 7
20
80
100
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
p
P Cf.. of lap plate
Fig. 8 Lap Plate Prying Mechanism
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.10.02 .04 .06 .08
BOLT ELONGATION, INCHES
Effect of Bolt Preload on the Shear Strength of A325 Bolts
---------.---------. -~--
------- ...:--------------1----Snug ~2 Turn . . 1~2 Turn I
o
20
o
80
Fig. 9
60
ULTIMATESHEARSTRESS,
KSI 40
':~ ,
60
•40
BOLT Torqued TensionTENSION,
't~ Thd. in GripKIPS
20 8B Lot
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
- - -..- ---------
100
•IIIIIIII,I
IIIIIIIIII
.08
.08
·04 .06
ELONGATION, INCHES
Torqued Tension
I/~ Thd. in Grip
KK Lot
Effect of Bolt Preload on the Shear Strength of A490 Bolts
o
20
80
o
20
40
60
40
120
Fig. 10
ULTIMATESHEARSTRESS, 60
KSI
BOLTTENSION,
KIPS
Lot T
Q
~~-
""""
~Lot Q
~-~----"",Lot T \
\
0.20
INCHES
R
~--~
""'\.,'\
+~.
t t
~Lot R
S
Lubricated Faying Surface
0.10
DEFORMATION,
..,------ Clean Mill Scale Faying Surface
Lot S
Shear-Deformation Curves for Different Failure Planes
Effect of Lubrication on the Shear-Deformation Relationship
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16
DEFORMATION, INCHES
80
Fig. 12
40
o
o
20
20
40
100
80
Fig. 11
100
LOAD, 60KIPS
LOAD, 60KIPS
III
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.24.20.16.12
DEFORMATION, INCHES
.08
Bolts After Failure in Shear
Typical Shear-Deformation Curves for BoltsTested in A440 Steel Tension Jigs
.04
A325 BOLT
A354BC BOLT
-Fig. 14
o
Fig. 13
A354 BO BOLT
100@-_QJl---o:DO-oco.J6- ..... ~A354 SO Bolt
8--0 ...... ED Lot8..---0 "
~ "~~ 0/J • ,
all • __.JII.~"''-'~. A354 BC Bolt80 / I:::.A-- .-;::A-- CC Lot
<:#00 ~ L.>
II Ii:::.-. I:::.
,r A325 Bolto 00 • • ~.. ~ 8B Lot
I yl:::.60 ~_ I:::. ,z:,
:'01:::., Ii:>
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
•
.28.24
••
•
.20
.20
•••
••
•
.16
.16
A440 SteelFD Lot
.12.08
Typical Shear-Deformation Curves for 7/8 in. and1 in. Bolts Tested in A440 Steel Tension Jigs
Typical Shear-Deformation Curves for A354 BD BoltsTested in Tension Jigs of Different Steel
DEFORMATION, INCHES
DEFORMATION, INCHES
.04
o -• 0...0_ --tl~o 0
.0 ,n' 0;' 0 .
Q;tp I" FD Lot."00,
Q aT Steel~ I .-R. ~.FD Lot 0\0<;'" - F 0 0 "0
...... . ..o ~ • 0 \.0~ . .
/ .o 9 19 •
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
o
100
o
20
40
80
100
60
80
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
•
A325 BoltA440 Steel
.24
A490 BoltQ & T Steel
.20
o
.16.12.os
Effect of Grip and Loading Span on theShear-Deformation Curve
DEFORMATION. INr.~l:'C
4" GripED Lot
.04
-tJ--o,.o~----
....... 0~ S"G'/ rip
.fl GO Lot/
01I
Sawed Sections of A325 Bolt in A440 Steel andA490 Bolt in Constructional Alloy Steel
Fig. 18
100
o
so
Fig. 17
SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
100
80
60SHEARSTRESS,
KSI
40
o
Fig. 19
Compression Jig
Jig
Slotted Hole
Bolt A
• Special Tension Jig
Test Bolt
DEFORMATION, INCHES
Influence of End Restraint on theShear Strength of A325 Bolts
.28
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
REF ERE N C E S
Christopher, R. J. and Fisher, J. W.CALIBRATION OF ALLOY STEEL BOLTS, Fritz Laboratory ReportNo. 288.19, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., July, 1963
Rumpf, J. L. and Fisher, J. W.CALIBRATION OF A325 BOLTS, Journal of the StructuralDivision, ASCE, Vol. 89, No. ST6, Dec. 1963
Batho, C.INVESTIGATIONS ON BOLTS AND BOLTED JOINTS, First Reportof the Steel Structures Research Committee, London, 1931
Wilson, W. M. and Thomas, F. P.FATIGUE TESTS OF RIVETED JOINTS, University of IllinoisBulletin No. 302, University of Illinois Experiment'Station, 1938
Baron, F. and Larson, E. W.COMPARISON OF BOLTED AND RIVETED JOINTS, TransactionsASCE, Vol. 120, Paper No. 2778, 1955
Munse, W. H., Wright, D. and Newmark, N.LABORATORY TESTS OF HIGH TENSILE BOLTED STRUCTURAL JOINTS,Proceedings ASCE, Vol. 80, May~ 1954
Foreman, R. T. and Rumpf, J. L.STATIC TENSION TESTS OF COMPACT BOLTED JOINTS,Transactions, ASCE, Vol. 126, Part II, p. 228, 1961
Bendigo, R. A., Hansen, R. M. and Rumpf, J. L.LONG BOLTED JOINTS, Journal of the Structural Division,ASCE, Vol. 89, ST6, 1963
Fisher, J. W., Ramseier, P. o. and Beedle, L. S.TESTS OF A440 STEEL JOINTS FASTENED WITH A325 BOLTS,Publications, IABSE, Vol. 23, 1963
Chesson, E., Faustino, N. L. and Munse, W. H.STATIC STRENGTH OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS UNDER COMBINEDSHEAR AND TENSION, University of Illinois, March 1964
American Society for Testing and MaterialsHIGH STRENGTH STEEL BOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL JOINTS,INCLUDING SUITABLE NUTS AND PLAIN HARDENED WASHERSA325-61T
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
American Society for Testing and MaterialsTENTATIVE SPECIFICATION FOR QUENCHED AND TEMPEREDALLOY STEEL BOLTS AND STUDS WITH SUITABLE NUTS,A354-58T, 1958
American Society for Testing and MaterialsTENTATIVE SPECIFICATION FOR HIGH. STRENGTH ALLOY STEELBOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL JOINTS, INCLUDING SUITABLENUTS AND PLAIN HARDENED WASHERS, A490-64T, 1964
Davis, R. E., Woodruff, G. B. and Davis, H. E.TENSION TESTS OF LARGE RIVETED JOINTS, Transactions,ASCE, Vol. 105, p. 1193, 1940
Munse, W. H. and Cox, H. L.THE STATIC STRENGTH OF RIVETS SUBJECTED TO COMBINEDTENSION AND SHEAR, University of Illinois EngineeringExperiment Station Bulletin No. 437, Vol. 54, No. 29,Dec. 1956
Francis, A. J.THE BEHAVIOR OF ALUMINUM ALLOY RIVETED JOINTS, TheAluminum Development Association, Research ReportNo. 15, London, 1953
Wallaert, J. J. and Fisher, J. W.THE HISTORY OF INTERNAL BOLT TENSION IN BOLTS CONNECTINGLARGE JOINTS, Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report No.288.13, Lehigh University, 1964 ,.
Kaplan, S.DOUBLE SHEAR TESTS OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS, FritzEngineering Laboratory Report No. 271.4, LehighUniversity, 1959 (Summarized by J. L. Rumpf inSHEAR RESISTANCE OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS, Fritz Lab.Report 271.3, 1958)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII