Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt Thesis

22

description

 

Transcript of Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt Thesis

Page 1: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis
Page 2: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

AN ANALYSIS OF AN ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT FARMING DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS IN HASSAN SYSTEMS IN HASSAN

DISTRICTDISTRICT

BY: THEERTHA PRASAD

PRESENTED BY: SHANKARAIAH, N

PAK-9120 Jr.M.Sc. Agril.Extn

Page 3: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION

• Agriculture has been the major source of livelihood in the country

• Indian agriculture is characterized by mixed farming

• Small and marginal farmers are unable to meet the need with the income from crop husbandry

Page 4: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Conti…Conti…

• In the recent years, integrated farming system gave scientific touch to the existing practices

• The main aim of the farming system are to improve rapidly the socio economic condition of the individual families

Page 5: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES• To identify the existing farming systems

• To study the socio economic and personal characteristic of the farmers association with the farming systems

• To find out the adoption of improved practices in different farming systems

• To compare the profitability of the different farming systems based on the production activity.

• To document the constraints faced by farmers in adoption of different farming systems

Page 6: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

REVIEW OF LITERATURE• Concept of farming system

• socio economic and personal characteristic of the farmers association with the farming systems

• Adoption of improved farm practices by farmers

Page 7: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Conti…Conti…

• Profitability of different farming systems

• Constraints faced by farmers in different farming systems

Page 8: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

MATERIAL AND METHODSMATERIAL AND METHODS

• Locale of the studyLocale of the study Hassan district

Page 9: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Sl. No.

Types of farming system

Taluks

Number of respondentAlur Hassan

1. Rain cultivation system

15 28 43

2. Irrigated cultivation system

45 32 77

Total 120

Research design: “Ex-post facto”

Page 10: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Variables used in the studyVariables used in the studySl.No Variables Measurement

Dependent Variables

1. Adoption Procedure

2. Profitability Schedule

Independent variables

1. Age Procedure developed

2. Education Procedure developed

3. landholding Procedure developed

4. Mass media, extension contact and participation

Scale developed

5. Economic motivation Procedure developed

Page 11: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

• Data collectionData collection Personal interview method- pre tested schedule

• Statistical tools usedStatistical tools used• Mean• Percentage• Standard deviation • Chi-square test• Correlation Coefficient• Multiple Regression Analysis

Page 12: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

RESULTSRESULTS

Sl No.

Systems Number of farmers

percent

1. Crop production only 15 34.89

2. Crop production + animal husbandry

12 27.90

3. Crop production + coconut garden

3 06.97

4. Crop production + coconut garden+ animal husbandry

6 13.96

5. Crop production + animal husbandry + poultry

7 16.28

Total 43 100.00

Farming system identify based on the type of production activity in rainfed cultivation system n=43

Page 13: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

RESULTSRESULTS

Sl No.

Systems Number of farmers

Percent

1. Crop production only 9 11.60

2. Crop production + animal husbandry

11 14.28

3. Crop production + coconut garden

24 31.17

4. Crop production + coconut garden+ animal husbandry

18 23.38

5. Crop production + animal husbandry + poultry

9 11.69

6 Crop production + animal husbandry + Fishery

6 7.79

Total 43 100.00

Farming system identify based on the type of production activity in irrigated cultivation systemn=77

Page 14: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Sl.No

Source of irrigation No. of farmers

Percent Net area irrigated(Acre)

Average area irrigated (Acre)

1. Canal only 10 12.99 15.0 1.50

2. Tank only 23 29.87 19.2 0.83

3. Open well only 3 03.89 08.0 2.60

4. Tube well 5 6.50 17.0 3.40

5. Canal +tank 21 27.28 21.5 1.02

6. Canal +tank + tube well

8 10.38 65.0 8.12

7 Canal +tank + tube well+ open well

7 09.09 69.0 9.85

Total 77 100.00 214.0 -

Water source in Irrigated Farming Systems

Page 15: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Water source in Irrigated Farming SystemsWater source in Irrigated Farming Systems

Page 16: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Overall adoption Scores of the Farming for Selected Overall adoption Scores of the Farming for Selected crops Under Different Farming System crops Under Different Farming System

SL.No.

Farming system

Adoption quotient Overall adoption

Ragi Paddy Maize Potato Ginger

1.Rainfed cultivation system

34.45 -------- 50.83 57.92 ------- 47.73

2. Irrigated cultivation system

41.19 70.65 59.16 69.08 43.07 56.63

Page 17: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Adoption Quotient of the Farmers for selected crops grown under different farming system

Crops

Ad

op

tio

n q

uo

tien

tA

do

pti

on

qu

oti

ent

Page 18: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Constraints faced by Farmers Under Constraints faced by Farmers Under Rainfed FarmingRainfed Farming

SL. No.

Constraints No. of farmers

Percent Rank

1. Lack of water resources 43 100.00 I

2. High cost of cultivation 42 97.67 II

3. Non availability of skilled labourers 41 95.34 III

4. High cost of input 38 88.33 IV

5. Occurance of pest and diseases 34 79.06 V

6. Non availability of loans 34 79.06 VI

7. Lack of improved breeds 24 55.81 VII

8. Lack of high yielding varieties 20 46.51 VIII

9. Non availability of quality seeds 18 41.86 IX

Page 19: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

Constraints faced by Farmers Under Constraints faced by Farmers Under Rainfed FarmingRainfed Farming

SL. No.

Constraints No. of farmers

Percent Rank

10. Lack of mass media participation 18 41.86 X

11. Lack of veterinary hospital facility 16 37.02 XI

12. Lack of improved farm implements 19 42.55 XII

13. Lack of training 14 32.55 XIII

14. Illiteracy 14 32.55 XIV

15. Lack of Dairy Cooperative Societies 13 30.23 XV

16. Non availability of fertilizers and manures

12 27.90 XVI

17. Lack of profitable marketing system 10 23.25 XVII

18. Lack of transportation facilities 7 16.27 XVIII

Page 20: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

IMPLICATION OF THE IMPLICATION OF THE STUDYSTUDY

• As the combination of enterprises gives more profit to the farmers ,its always better to follow more than one enterprise.

• Some small and marginal farmers who have vegetarian food habit, hesitate to adopt enterprises like poultry, sheep , goat etc.

• Instead of following monocropping, it is better to carry out mixed or intercropping to avoid loss and get more income.

Page 21: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

IMPLICATION OF THE IMPLICATION OF THE STUDYSTUDY

• The constraints such as middleman problem, lack of storage facilities , electricity problem, non availability of soil testing report could be minimize by the concerned efforts of the concerned department.

• There is a tendency among farmers to grow specific crops like potato, ginger extensively that fetch more market prices.

Page 22: Shankaraiah N :Naik Sir Ppt  Thesis

THANK YOUTHANK YOU