SFDCP – sfdc project

13
SFDCP – sfdc project A brief introduction

Transcript of SFDCP – sfdc project

Page 1: SFDCP – sfdc project

SFDCP – sfdc projectA brief introduction

Page 2: SFDCP – sfdc project

Database ServerRedHat Enterprise Linux

PostgreSQL database

Web serverRedHat LinuxApache Web ServerPythonPostreSQL database client

Production Line ClientsWeb Browser

Office Tools, SettingsWeb Browser

PostgreSQL DB connection

XMLHTTP/AjaxXMLHTTP/Ajax

Auto-Checkpoint serverRedHat LinuxPythonPostgreSQL database client

PostgreSQL DB connection

File I / O

-Database server HW: IBM x346, 2xCPU, 6x36GB SCSI (O/S: Raid1, DB: Raid1E)

-Database / Web server / Auto-Checkpoint service can be installed on the same machine.

-Production clients, BOM administration, Order administration, Route settings, Reporting : all are web based

-possibility to connect to 3rd party applications with Auto-Checkpoint service via file I / O.

3rd party appsAccess to Auto-Checkpoint server file system

System Overview

Page 3: SFDCP – sfdc project

Technology: Python, JavaScript, HTML, SQL-Easy to maintain or debug-New functions can be developed and added quickly.-no installation needed on client’s side

Page 4: SFDCP – sfdc project

Process Route Configuration -Dynamically define new route-Predefined checkpoint types: AddPart, Pass/Fail, Sample, GetData RemovePart, ReplacePart, Palletize, Ship, etc.-once the routing is defined the line clients are automatically set up for use

Page 5: SFDCP – sfdc project

Order Administration-Release order with serial numbers generated by rule-Release order with given list of serial numbers-Manually set order status when needed (ie. Killed, hold)

Page 6: SFDCP – sfdc project

Production Line Clients -call for operator identification first-can be run in more instances-hyperlink set in the “Clients” tab once the checkpoint is defined in the system route

Page 7: SFDCP – sfdc project

Product Administration-model definition: parts with alternatives, grouped according to the route setup.-part definition: p/n, description and full format as regular expression-possibility to read part data from SAP dump file

Page 8: SFDCP – sfdc project

-WIP reports by order/location/serial-Lookup in system by unit/model/order/location-Scorecard / hourly data-unit history

Reporting

Page 9: SFDCP – sfdc project

Documentation-database setup script with comments-server settings different from default values included-message board function for failure reporting-software codes are human-readable, commented

Page 10: SFDCP – sfdc project

Usage and feedbacks- 9200 units processed in the Acer/PackardBell rework-Peak load about 800/day : no measurable effects of workload-Minor problems (scanned data, user errors) corrected-User satisfaction survey after closure: feedbacks are positive

Page 11: SFDCP – sfdc project

Actual status The existing COPS BOM is migrated into SFC for test & debug purposes (~ 10K PN / part groups) Pilot build with current product was done within this SFC Connection to IBM test system working. Label printing already developed, some of the labels already done and using variable data from unit’s BOM

Page 12: SFDCP – sfdc project
Page 13: SFDCP – sfdc project

Benefits to the existing SFC solutions No expensive server (like IBM pSeries, ) required No licensing for OS and DBM (hence both reliable and common) Majority of clients only require a browser, OS-independent, performance-efficient. Flexible and fully customizable. Easy to maintain and expand SFC tailored for the customers specific needs. All the locally developed tools/reports -which were developed during the last 8 years to make the factory’s work efficient - could still be used. User-friendly interface, possibility to use local language Fast & robust Closed system, behind corporate firewall, no access to the internet Developers know the customer, product and processes for ~10 years. Same technology as the customers current test environment. Need & support in the same time zone