settlement measures

21
Disputes Dispute: Industrial dispute means any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or non employment or the terms of employment . The dispute has to be between plurality of workman and employer. Individual workman cannot raise an industrial dispute Individual workman cannot raise an industrial dispute A workman can raise a dispute directly before a Conciliation Officer in the case of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or any form of termination of service. In all other cases, the dispute has to be raised by a Union / Management. Disputes may lead to loss of work usually calculated in terms of Man- days lost. This is given as total working days lost within a period ( ) f f (usually one year). This figure is computed by multiplying the number of days with the number of affected employees.

description

IR

Transcript of settlement measures

Page 1: settlement measures

DisputesDispute: Industrial dispute means any dispute or difference between

employers and employers, or between employers and workmen orbetween workmen and workmen, which is connected with employmentor non-employment or the terms of employmentor non employment or the terms of employment .

• The dispute has to be between plurality of workman and employer.Individual workman cannot raise an industrial disputeIndividual workman cannot raise an industrial dispute

• A workman can raise a dispute directly before a Conciliation Officer inthe case of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or any form oftermination of service. In all other cases, the dispute has to be raisedby a Union / Management.

• Disputes may lead to loss of work usually calculated in terms of Man-days lost. This is given as total working days lost within a period( ) f f(usually one year). This figure is computed by multiplying the number ofdays with the number of affected employees.

Page 2: settlement measures

Causes of Disputes in India

The causes of industrial disputes can be broadly classified into twocategories: economic and non-economic causes.

• The economic factors will include issues relating to compensation likewages, bonus, allowances, and conditions for work, working hours,leave and holidays without pay, unjust layoffs and retrenchments.

• The non economic factors will include victimization of workers, illtreatment by staff members, sympathetic strikes, political factors,indiscipline etc.

• Miscellaneous Factors: The miscellaneous factors include- Inter/Intra Union Rivalry- Charter of Demands- Work Load

St di d / l / i diti / f t- Standing orders/rules/service conditions/safety measures- Non-implementation of agreements and awards etc.

Page 3: settlement measures
Page 4: settlement measures

A: Agriculture and forestry B: Fishing C: Mining and Quarrying D: Manufacturing

Page 5: settlement measures

E: Electricity, gas and supply F: Construction G: Wholesale & retail trade H: Hotels and restaurants I:Transport & communication J: Financial intermediation K: Real estate L: Public Administration M: EducationN: Healthcare O: Community services P: Private households

Page 6: settlement measures
Page 7: settlement measures
Page 8: settlement measures
Page 9: settlement measures
Page 10: settlement measures
Page 11: settlement measures

Settlement Measures

KEY PROVISIONS OF ID ACT (1947):COLLECTIVE BARGAINING: It is a technique by which disputes as to

conditions of employment are resolved amicably, by agreementrather than coercion

CONCILIATION AND MEDIATION: It is facilitated negotiation,essential in public utility services. Binding on parties to thedisputes

ARBITRATION: Agreement between workman and management withthe help of arbitrator

ADJUDICATION: Compulsary legal action

Page 12: settlement measures

Compulsory Adjudication LC, IT, NT

Award Sec. 18(3) of ID Act

Reference by theAppropriate Government

Sec. 10(1)

Publication of award

Mediation/Conciliation(if successful

S. 2-A, 33-A

INDUSTRIALDISPUTES

Judicial review - Art. 226 orArt. 136

Voluntary Arbitration – 10-A

(if successfulSettlement)

Sec. 18(3) of The I D act

Award – 18(2) & 18(3)

Judicial review - Art. 226 orArt. 136

C ll ti B i iCollective Bargaining –If successful – settlement

Sec. 18(1) of ID Act

Page 13: settlement measures

Dispute Settlement

• Mediation– Impartial third party who helps the two parties to reach a mutually

acceptable settlement.– The mediator is any independent entity– Is invited by the disputing parties themselves– Mediator only helps the two parties discuss issuesMediator only helps the two parties discuss issues– Mediator does not gives any decision/award/judgement– He/she only guides the discussion and enables the two parties to

reach at a consensusreach at a consensus– Final agreement is made by the two parties themselves.– Win-win arrangement– Highly informal arrangement

Page 14: settlement measures

Dispute Settlement• Conciliation

– Impartial third party helps the two parties to reach a mutually acceptablesettlement.C ili t t ti t l t th t h i f ti– Conciliator meets parties separately or together to exchange information,clarify issues and settle misunderstanding.

– Conciliator does not impose a solution but works with the parties to enablethem to come to an agreementthem to come to an agreement.

– He may give his views and possible solutions but not judgement– In India, conciliation officers and conciliation boards are also provided

region-wise as per the provisions of ID act.region wise as per the provisions of ID act.– Win-win arrangement– Slightly more formal than mediation

• The Organization of the Chief Labour Commissioner(Central) acts as theThe Organization of the Chief Labour Commissioner(Central) acts as theprimary conciliatory agency in the Central Government for industrialdisputes. Then there are the Regional Labour Commissioners (Central) andAssistant Labour Commissioners (Central) who on behalf of the Chief LabourC i i (C t l) t C ili t Offi i diff t t f thCommissioner (Central) act as Conciliatory Officers in different parts of thecountry. The Conciliation Officer make efforts to resolve the dispute throughsettlement between the workmen and the management. .

Page 15: settlement measures

Dispute Settlement• Arbitration

– Third party settles the dispute by making an independent decisionfor the two parties.Wh i d t i l di t i t d th l d th– Where any industrial dispute exists and the employer and theworkmen agree to refer the dispute to arbitration, they may, by awritten agreement, refer the dispute to arbitration to such person orpersons as may be specified in the arbitration agreement. Such apersons as may be specified in the arbitration agreement. Such aperson could be a legal expert, a retired judge etc.

– The arbitrator or arbitrators shall investigate the dispute and submitto the appropriate Government the arbitration award signed by thearbitrator or all the arbitrators, as the case may be.

– Some prefer arbitration, as the responsibility “for reachingagreement” is made by a neutral party (quite often, appointed bythe government)the government).

– Arbitration gives some people the impression that they did not givein to the other party but “fought all the way” to the Arbitration Court.

– Maybe win-loseMaybe win-lose

Page 16: settlement measures

Dispute SettlementAdjudication• In case of failure of conciliation or arbitration, a report is sent to Government (IR Desks in

Ministry of Labour). The Ministry of Labour refers the dispute for adjudication.• The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides for setting up of Labour Courts, IndustrialThe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides for setting up of Labour Courts, Industrial

Tribunals and National Tribunals.• Labour Courts and Industrial Tribunals are set up by the Central Government and the

State Government for for dealing with matters which fall in the Central and the Statesphere respectivelysphere respectively.

• Where the dispute is referred for adjudication , within two weeks of the date of receipt ofthe order of reference, the party representing workmen and employer involved in thedispute must file with these authorities, a statement of demands relating only to the issuesas are included in the order of referenceas are included in the order of reference.

• The next step after filing of statement is to fix up the date which first hearing of thedispute will take place. The hearing must ordinarily be continued from day to day andarguments must follow immediately after the closing evidence.

• Where an industrial dispute has been referred to a labour court, tribunal or nationaltribunal for adjudication, it shall hold its proceedings expeditiously and shall as soon as itis practicable and submit its award to the appropriate government.

• Tribunals have power to pass the award and this award is binding on both the parties top p g pthe dispute an is submitted to the government. The Ministry of Labour publishes theAward in the Official Gazette within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of theAward.

Page 17: settlement measures

Dispute Settlement• The adjudicating authority enjoys same powers as are vested in a civil court (under the

code of civil procedure, 1908). these are:

(i) Entering the premises, for the purpose of enquiry into any existing or apprehended disputes, after giving reasonable notice. (ii) enforcing attendance of any person and examining him or oath; it may accept, admit or call for evidence at any stage of the proceeding.(iii) compelling the production of documents and material objects and their inspection, for its the authority must assign reasons. (iv) issuing commission for the examination for witness. (v) appointing one or more persons as assessor or assessors to advise it in the proceedings before it. (vi) determining the costs of , and incidental to,any proceedings before the adjudication machinery.

• There are at present 17 Central Government Industrial Tribunals-cum-Labour Courts.There are at present 17 Central Government Industrial Tribunals cum Labour Courts.These CGTIs-cum-Labour Courts are at New Delhi, Mumbai (2 CGITs), Bangalore,Kolkata, Asansol, Dhanbad (2 CGITs), Jabalpur, Chandigarh, Kanpur, Jaipur, Lucknow,Nagpur, Hyderabad, Chennai and Bhubaneshwar. Out of these CGITs, 2 CGITs namelyMumbai-I and Kolkata have been declared as National Tribunals.Mumbai I and Kolkata have been declared as National Tribunals.

Page 18: settlement measures

Dispute SettlementLabour CourtThe Presiding Officer of a Labour Court should at least have held a judicial office for not less

than 7 years or been a Presiding Officer of a labour Court under a State Act for not lessthan 5 years. He may also have higher qualifications such as being a District Judge or any y g q g gAdditional District Judge for three years or a High Court Judge.

The Second Schedule of the I.D. Act deals with matters within the jurisdiction of Labour Courts which fall under the category of Rights Disputes. Such disputes are as follows:

• The propriety or legality of an order passed by an employer under the standing orders;• The propriety or legality of an order passed by an employer under the standing orders;• The application and interpretation of standing orders which regulate conditions of

employment.• Discharge or dismissal of workmen including reinstatement of, or grant of relief to,

workmen wrongfully dismissed;• Withdrawal of any customary concession or privilege;• Illegality or otherwise of a strike or lock-out; and• All matters other than those specified in the Third Schedule• All matters other than those specified in the Third Schedule.

Page 19: settlement measures

Dispute SettlementIndustrial TribunalsThe Presiding Officer of an Industrial Tribunal should have been at least a District Judge or

an Additional District Judge for three years. Alternatively, he should have held the post ofa judge in a High Court. No person can be appointed as the presiding Officer of aj g g p pp p gNational Tribunal unless he has held the post of a Judge in a High Court.

The Third Schedule of the I.D. Act deals with matters within the jurisdiction of IndustrialTribunals which could be classified as Interest Disputes These are as follows:Tribunals which could be classified as Interest Disputes. These are as follows:-

• Wages, including the period and mode of payment;• Compensatory and other allowances;• Hours of work and rest intervals;;• Leave with wages and holidays;• Bonus, profit sharing, provident fund and gratuity;• Shift working otherwise than in accordance with standing orders;• Classification by grades;• Rules of discipline;• Retrenchment of workmen and closure of establishment; and• Any other matter that may be prescribed• Any other matter that may be prescribed.•

Page 20: settlement measures

Dispute SettlementNational Tribunal• The Central Government may set up a National Tribunal for adjudication of industrial

disputes which in its opinion involve questions of national importance or are of suchnature that industrial establishments in more than one State are likely to be interested inysuch disputes.

• No person can be appointed as the presiding Officer of a National Tribunal unless he hasheld the post of a Judge in a High Court.

• National tribunal shall take up only those cases which are referred by the Central Govt• National tribunal shall take up only those cases which are referred by the Central Govt.

Page 21: settlement measures

THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 PASSED BY THE PARLIAMENT

• To provide a grievance ventilation and redressal machinery within an establishmenthaving 20 or more workmen with one stage appeal at the level of the Head of theIndustrial Establishment in order to promote better industrial relations at the industrialestablishment level.

• The Bill also proposes to empower the Labour Court or Tribunal to execute their awards,orders of settlements arrived at as a decree of a Civil Court. This amendment will ensurebetter enforcement of the awards given by CGITs-cum-LC.

• To provide individual workman more free and direct access to Labour Courts/ TribunalsTo provide individual workman more free and direct access to Labour Courts/ Tribunalsin cases of retrenchment, discharge, dismissal or termination of services.

• To amplify the definition of term ‘appropriate Government’ the Standing Committee hassuggested that the industrial disputes between a contractor and contract labour employedin any industrial establishment needs to be brought under the purview of ‘appropriatein any industrial establishment needs to be brought under the purview of appropriateGovernment’.