Setting aside the burdens of the past
-
Upload
peter-evans-greenwood -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
140 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Setting aside the burdens of the past
Setting aside the burdensof the pastThe possibilities oftechnology-drivenchange in Australia
Centre for the EdgeFebruary 2014
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.2
What is the Shift Index
The driver for the Shift Index
To determine if the incredible pace of
change and the turmoil in the market
today is real, or simply a perception
brought on by our hyper-connected,
always-on environment.
The Hypothesis
• Relentless improvement in technology
is slashing the cost of communication
and data processing.
• This is creating knowledge flows that
are changing the balance of power in
the market.
• Astute individuals and firms are using
these knowledge flows to improve
their performance.
• The result is the creation of new
winners, and the elimination of firms
that are unable to adapt.
The Method
The Shift Index is constructed from from
three sub-indices:
• The Foundation Index, the lead
indicator, which measures the
improvement, penetration and
regulation of computing and mobile
technology.
• The Flow Index, which measures the
resulting increase in knowledge flows.
• The Impact Index, the lagging
indicator, which measures that the
impact on the people, firms, and the
market as a whole.
This approach is based on the
framework developed for the US Shift
Index.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.3
Key Findings
Business is more intense
The Shift Index shows that the change
in the Australian market has been
measurable and significant.
• Competitive Intensity of the
Australian market has increased 34%
since 2000
• Stock Price Volatility has increased
an average of 1.1% per year over
the last 23 years
The development of ubiquitous mobile
and global communications networks
has driven the Australian market to
become both measurably more
competitive and measurably more
turbulent than ever before.
The balance of power is changing
The change is driven by one of the
highest adoption rates for networked
and mobile telecommunications, and
social media, in the world.
• Local consumers’ rapid adoption of
social media and mobile technology is
tipping the balance of power in
their favour
• Improvements in global
communications and logistics
networks, that allow anyone from
anywhere to compete for
everything
Adapt or die
The change is creating new winners and
losers.
• The gap in financial performance
between the top and bottom firms is
increasing
• The gap in salaries between creative
individuals (engineers, designers…)
and others is increasing
Companies that cannot adapt are
being eliminated from the market at an
increasing rate.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.4
For more information…
Peter Williams
Chief Edge Officer,Deloitte Center for the Edge
Tel : +61 3 9671 7629 [email protected]
The full report Contact us
Robert Hillard
National Leader, Technology Consulting Tel : +61 3 9671 7971 [email protected]
Peter Evans-Greenwood
Fellow, Centre for the Edge
Tel : +61 439 327 793 [email protected]
View the report at bit.ly/1mudcKc
The evidence
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.6
The Shift Index
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
50
100
150
200
250
Foundation Index Linear (Foundation Index)Flow Index Linear (Flow Index)Impact Index Linear (Impact Index)
Australia’s digital infrastructure has seen rapid development,
increasing the flow of information and capital, and changing the
structure of our economy as a result.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.7
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
Australia US
Competitive IntensityHerfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) for Australia and the US
(down is more competitive). Australia continues to trend toward
the same level of competitive intensity as the US,
as the Australian market grows.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.8
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Stock Price VolatilityShort-term stock price volatility (standard deviation in stock
prices over the year) is increasing as firms find it more
challenging to maintain a competitive advantage.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.9
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Mo
bil
e su
bsc
rip
tio
ns
per
in
div
idu
alMobile penetration
Australian consumers’ tendency to have multiple accounts per capita (one person
owning a phone and a 3G-connected tablet, for example) and use mobiles to
communicate with devices (such as drinks machines that send an SMS to the
supplier when they need to be refilled) accounts for the adoption rate of over
100%.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.10
Wireless Activity
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Min
ute
s o
f U
se
Captures the increasing flow of information between
individuals (rather than between locations) via the total
number of wireless minutes used in Australia per year.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.11
Social Media Activity
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
The number of minutes Internet users spend on
social media websites relative to the total
minutes they spend on the Internet generally.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.12
Net-Bohemian Score
1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Shows that the relative proportion (% creative population -
% industrial population) of Australian’s with creative
professions (engineers, designers…) has steadily
increased over time.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.13
ROA Performance Gap
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Australia Linear (Australia) US
Other than for the period from 1997–2000, covering the dot-
com crash and the investment bubble leading up to it, Australia
has had consistently larger ROA performance gap than the US.
The gap between winners and losers is increasing.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.14
ROA PerformanceTop & Bottom Quartile
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
Australia Top Quartile Linear (Australia Top Quartile)Australia Bottom Quartile Linear (Australia Bottom Quartile)
The gap in ROA performance between the top and bottom
quartile is increasing. The top performing companies in
Australia are consistently delivering ~10% return on
assets, while the bottom performing companies are being
cleared from the market.
Copyright © 2014 Deloitte. All rights reserved.15
Returns to Talent
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Australia Linear (Australia)
We are seeing increased returns to the creative professionals
who are best positioned to leverage increased knowledge flows
and create additional value in the gap in compensation between
creative professions and other professions.