SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

11
The (Exergetic) Life Cycle Assessment ((E)LCA) of microalgae production as feed for aquaculture: an environmental sustainability analysis Sue Ellen TAELMAN (a) S. De Meester (a) , L. Roef (b) , M. Michiels (b) , J. Dewulf (a) (a) Research Group EnVOC, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium (b) Proviron Holding nv, G. Gilliotstraat 60, 2620 Hemiksem, Belgium SETAC Conference 11-13 November 2013 Rome, Italy

description

Introduction Aquaculture: feeding fish to fish principle is not sustainable Alternative for fish oil/meal production = ALGAE Microalgae are unicellular, mostly photo-autotrophic organisms They need water, light and inorganic nutrients to grow Some advantages: Very rich biomass Able to live of waste streams Higher photosynthetic efficiency Marginal land is sufficient Known disadvantages: Low cell density cultivation -> reflection on harvesting and processing Claimed to be a sustainable biomass resource -> correct? .

Transcript of SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

Page 2: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

2

Aquaculture: feeding fish to fish principle is not sustainable

Alternative for fish oil/meal production = ALGAE

Microalgae are unicellular, mostly photo-autotrophic organismsThey need water, light and inorganic nutrients to grow

Some advantages:• Very rich biomass• Able to live of waste streams• Higher photosynthetic efficiency• Marginal land is sufficient

Known disadvantages:Low cell density cultivation -> reflection on harvesting and processing

Claimed to be a sustainable biomass resource -> correct?

Introduction

Page 3: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

3

• Examining the environmental sustainability of algae production in the new ProviAPT system Scenarios:

• Pilot 2012 (based on actual production runs)• Two upscaling scenarios (2013 and 2015)

• Determining the potential of microalgae as fish feed application + benchmarking with traditional fish feed

Research questions

Page 4: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

4

• Exergy analysis on process level– Thermodynamics: ‘all real processes generate entropy’

‘all real processes generate loss of work potential’– Quality/quantity measurement of material & energy flows– Process improvement

• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), ISO standards 14000 & 14040

Methods

Functional unit: 1MJex

System boundaries: cradle to gateForeground: provided by Proviron

Background: database ecoinvent v2.2

Climate change (IPCC,2007)Resource consumption (CEENE, 2007)

Page 5: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

5Michiels, M. 2009 : Bioreactor. EP 2039753

Cultivation

240 m²

Pilot 2012

Page 6: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

6

Foreground system pilot 2012

Centrate Permeate

Page 7: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

7

Pilot 2012 Forecast:Pilot 2013

Forecast: First production scale 2015

Scenario (generic) Scale 240 m² 1320 m² 2.5 ha

Location Belgium Belgium SpainRecycling of permeate and centrate (process C and D)

No Yes, extra filtration on centrate

Yes, extra filtration on centrate

Photobioreactor Area PBR 12 m² 12 m² 26 m²

Reactive area PBR 7 m² 7 m² 21 m²Photosynthetic efficiency 1.2% on 12 m² 1.2% on 12 m² 2.4% on 26 m²

Areal productivity 4.59 g/m²/d 4.59 g/m²/d 15.1 g/m²/dVolumetric productivity 0.53 g/l/d 0.53 g/l/d 1.25 g/l/d

Efficiency fan 25 % 35 % 80 % (a)

Efficiency circulation pump 11 % 11 % 80 % (b)

Source CO2 bottled bottled Flue gasesHeat 200 W/m², 50% of the year

at 50% of the peak power200 W/m², 50% of the year at 50% of the peak power

No extra heat necessary

Upscaling analysis (1)

(a) based on document UNEP, 2006a (b) based on document UNEP, 2006b (c) Piek et al., 2012 (d) Sheehan et al., 1998

Page 8: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

8

Pilot 2012 Forecast:Pilot 2013

Forecast: First production scale 2015

Centrifuge Type Bowl centrifuge Bowl centrifuge Hydrostop centrifuge

Electricity consumption 15 kWh/m³ 3.5 kWh/m³ 0.95 kWh/m³(c)

Drying Type Freeze dryer Freeze dryer Drum dryer

Electricity consumption 59 kWh/kg DW 13 kWh/kg DW /Natural gas consumption / / 0.98 kWh/kg H2O(vapour)

(d)

Upscaling analysis (2)

(a) based on document UNEP, 2006a (b) based on document UNEP, 2006b (c) Piek et al., 2012 (d) Sheehan et al., 1998

Page 9: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

9

LCA: results (1)

Pilot plant (2012)

Forecast:Pilot plant

(2013)

Forecast: First production scale

(2015)

Cumulative Energy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE)MJex,CEENE/MJex DM 55.5 21.6 2.46

Renewable 0.58 0.18 0.11

Fossil 21.26 8.04 1.24

Nuclear 24.45 9.32 0.23

Metal ores 0.02 0.01 0.00

Minerals 0.17 0.01 0.01

Water 4.47 1.34 0.20

Land use 4.57 2.66 0.68

Atmosphere 0.00 0.00 0.00

Carbon Footprint (CF) kg CO2,eq/MJex DM

1.76 0.64 0.09

Page 10: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

10

Pilot 2012 Pilot 2013 First production scale 2015

Reference fish feed*

0102030405060 55.5

21.6

2.46 7.7

CEENE (MJex,CEENE/MJex DM)

LCA: results (2)

*(Huysveld et al., 2011; Huysveld et al., 2013)

3% 5%

8%

84%

Renewable Fossil Nuclear Metal ores MineralsWater Land use Atmosphere

Pilot 2012 Pilot 2013 First production scale 2015

Reference fish feed*

0

0.5

1

1.5

2 1.76

0.64

0.09 0.05

IPCC (kg CO2,eq / MJex DM)

CEENE (MJex,CEENE/MJex DM)

IPCC (kg CO2,eq/MJex DM)

Forecast Pilot 2013

Forecast First Production scale 2015

Pilot 2012

Pilot 2012 Forecast Pilot 2013

Forecast First Production scale 2015

Page 11: SETAC Conference November 2013 Rome, Italy

11

• Recycling of water/nutrients and savings on energy use show important routes to make the overall production more sustainable

• Also upscaling, reactor design improvements, enhancement of photosynthetic yield and good choice of location contribute to an environmental progress

• Although additional efforts are required to improve the carbon footprint, in the near future algae production can reach a lower resource footprint (2.46 MJex,CEENE/MJex DM) than traditional fish feed (7.70 MJex,CEENE/MJex DM)

Contact:

[email protected]+32 9 264 58 71

Conclusions and future research