Session4 bambang eka pelindo i

10/11/2011

1

Pelindo INumber One !

PELINDO IPELINDO I

Presented by :

Bambang Eka Cahyana

Director of Commercial and Business Development

Indonesia Port Corporation I

PORT OPERATION:INNOVATIVE PROBLEM SOLUTIONS OFFERED TO PORT OF BELAWAN

(Cases in CPO and Container Terminal s)

JAKARTA, 10 OCTOBER 2011


PELINDO IPELINDO I

Pelindo INumber One !Port of Belawan

2

Conventional terminal Belawan International Container Terminal(BICT)

Belawan InternationalContainer Terminal

(BICT)Conventional

terminal


PELINDO IPELINDO I


3

Innovation by widening and shifting channel access

Existing Condition:

Narrow Channel :

• Length: ± 13,5 km

• Draught: –9,50 m LWS

• Width 100 meter

• 1 lane and 2 direction. However,its risky for 2 direction due toshallow and narrow condition atbuoy 3 & 5.

• Ships have to wait for crossing

Expected Condition:

• Length: ± 11,8 km

• Draught: –14 m LWS

• Width 140 meter

• 1 lane, 2 direction (safe and no ship waiting time forcrossing in the channel)

Maritime access limitation

Benefit

SafetyIncrease safety of navigationthrough the wider channel Time and CostReduce ship waiting time atanchorage area whicheventually will reduce the shipcost.

LongTerm

ShortTerm• Continuous Dredging with draught guarantee

Major Problems in Port of Belawan

1. Maritime Access Limitation


PELINDO IPELINDO I


4

Former Condition (before August 2011) :

- Quay Length: 350 M,- 4 Loading Points with Poor productivity (loading

rate: 158 ton/h/loading point)- Capacity: 4.700.000 ton/year; while 2010

throughput is 3.500.000 ton (75% of its capacity)

CPO Terminal

Existing Condition: Innovative solution (after August 2011)

Extended from 350 M to 500 M by convertinggeneral cargo berth to CPO berth. The berth isequipped with 2 additional loading point

Installing the portable pump for increasing theloading rate up to 400 ton/h/loading point, so itcan reduce the berthing time significantly.

Installing 4 CPO tank storages (@5000 ton) atapron for temporary storage tank (total annualcapacity 220.000 ton/year )

TRT : 98.27 h/shipBT : 50.68 h/shipWT : 47.59 h/shipBOR : 78.77%

2. Lack of Capacity and low Productivity in CPO Terminal


10/11/2011

2


PELINDO IPELINDO I


Equipment Availabilty

CC 43,77%

HMC 47,12%

B/S/H : 19B/C/H : 22

DW Time : avg.5daysYOR : 57.40 %

Queue line ;Long Queue

Source : Simoppel Pelindo I

Existing Condition (2010)International Berth

Domestic Berth

TRT : 105.34 h/shipBT : 51.88 h/shipWT : 53,46 h/shipBOR : 74.44 %

B/S/H : 20B/C/H : 20

DW Time : avg.5daysYOR : 67.73 %

The problem1. Equipment Technical Life

2. Equipment Performance Ship Shore

Domestic

Yard

International


CC 63,21%

HMC 74,64%

DomesticInternational


RTG 87,93%


RS 92,13%

It’s hard to perform well since most ofequipments nearly reached itstechnical life

4. Operator wasting time• There is an indication that the shift

system is not suitable. It makes lowproductivity and fatique foroperators

TRT : 64.61 h/shipBT : 31.88 h/shipWT : 32.74 h/shipBOR : 47.99 %

3. Yard ConditionUneven yard high level conditions willdisturb yard operation using reach stacker& side loader. This situation makes yardoperation cannot optimum

5


3. Lack of Capacity and Low Productivity in Container Terminal

EquipmentTechnical

LifeNumber

CC29 years 223 years 312 years 1

HMC 2 years 2

RTG13 years 414 years 3

± 10 years 4


PELINDO IPELINDO I

Innovative Solution: Upgrading the Terminal Container

6

- Berth expansion (100 M),- Increase the capacity from 850.000 to 1.000.000 teus

- Phases I : 350 M berth (2012 - 2013),- Increase the capacity up to 1.300.000 teus (from previously 1.000.000 teus).

- Phases II : 400 M berth (Accomplished in 2016)- Increase the capacity up to 1.700.000 teus.

It’s expected that the terminal productivity will improve from 34 b/s/h to 45b/s/h

Upgrading the Terminal Container

4. Designing a shift working system from 3 shit/day with 1 operator/crane to 4 shift/day with 2 operators/crane.It will reduce wasting time due the changing shift and meal hour and operator fatique as well (reduce not effectivetime from 9 hours to 3 hours).

a. Equipment Modernization

2010 2011 2012

Exist : 6 CC, 4 HMC & 11 RTG New : 2 CC, 5 RTG New : 3 CC, 10 RTG

b. Berth expansion

1. Modernizing port equipment and expanding the berth

2. Increasing equipment availability and reliabilityImplementing contract maintenance system which regulate the payment system by equipment box rate

3. Leveling yard in domestic terminal. It is expected that the RTGS can perform optimally so that it can increaseyard operation productivity

6


PELINDO IPELINDO I


Conclusion

1. There are 3 major problems in port of Belawan: maritime accesslimitation, lack of terminal capacity and low of terminalproductivity (CPO and container terminal). IPC I have triedsome innovative solutions for dealing with these problems.

2. Widening and shifting channel access are solutions for maritimeaccess limitation; while, berth extension, installing portablepump and temporary tank storage at berth are solution for CPOterminal.

3. The solutions for the problem in container terminal are not onlyby berth expansion and equipment modernization but also byimproving the system such as shift working system that is from 3shit/day with 1 operator/crane to 4 shift/day with 2operators/crane 7

Session4 bambang eka pelindo i

Business

Transcript of Session4 bambang eka pelindo i