Session Three: Formulation of AfT bankable projects

26
UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Implementing Aid for Trade Bankable Projects in the Arab Region Hammamet, Tunisia, 12-13 December 2013 Ghazi Ben Ahmed Session Three: Formulation of AfT bankable projects

description

UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Implementing Aid for Trade Bankable Projects in the Arab Region Hammamet, Tunisia, 12-13 December 2013 Ghazi Ben Ahmed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Session Three: Formulation of AfT bankable projects

Page 1: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

UNITED NATIONSEconomic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA)

Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Implementing Aid for Trade Bankable Projects

in the Arab Region

Hammamet, Tunisia, 12-13 December 2013Ghazi Ben Ahmed

Session Three: Formulation of AfT bankable projects

Page 2: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Previous workshop – October 2013

1. Identification of bankable projects2. Design and preparation of bankable projects3. Resource mobilization4. Execution of bankable projects

Page 3: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Purpose and principles of the workshop

• To identify priority knowledge gaps, learning needs related to the identification and preparation, appraisal and design, M&E and packaging of bankable Aid for Trade projects and programmes – with a focus on M&E.

• To share experiences on common challenges and opportunities, and share best practice.

• Encourage open informal and constructive dialogue between experts, recipients and funders to support more effective Aid for Trade

Page 4: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Purpose of this session

• To provide an update on work undertaken so far• Development of the guidelines on formulating

bankable Aid for Trade projects and programmes• Allow participants to provide feedback on the

proposed guidelines and discuss any challenges in developing the concept notes / proposals

Page 5: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Formulating bankable Aid for Trade projects and

programmes

Page 6: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Broad outline of the guidance document (1)

1. Introduction- Purpose of the guidelines- Project background- Why these guidelines are needed- Preparing the case for funding

2. What makes a project or programme Aid for Trade- Background on Aid for Trade- Examples of Aid for Trade projects and programmes

3. Effective Aid for Trade- Principles- Examples

Page 7: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Broad outline of the guidance document (2)

4. Formulating Aid for Trade projects and programmes- Identifying need and demand from a trade lens- Determining Aid for Trade priorities- Diagnostics and situational analysis, and need assessments- Preparing proposals, concept notes, etc.- Importance of packaging and positioning- Design and appraisal

5. M&E - Theory of change, intervention logic and performance

frameworks - Indicators and benchmarking

6. ChecklistAnnexes (including templates – e.g. project concept note template)

Page 8: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Purpose of the guidance document

• The purpose of the guidance document is to introduce broad guidelines on how to develop bankable Aid for Trade projects and programmes and successfully position these within the Aid for Trade initiative, taking into account current perspectives and requirements of key Aid for Trade development partners.

• It aims to enable the systematic analysis of the constraints to trade for a country/region, identification of needs and the formulation of project and programme proposals that are ‘bankable’.

Page 9: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Why the guidance document is needed?

• Many developing countries face substantial difficulties in developing bankable projects and programmes based on their identified needs.

• According to the results of the 2011 OECD/WTO Aid for Trade questionnaire, 65% of respondents stated difficulties in designing bankable projects as one of the “most important” or “important” challenges in accessing trade-related funding.

• Numerous development partners and other funding agencies, as well as potential recipients, highlight problems in developing bankable projects and programmes. For instance, the Enhanced Integrated Framework.

Page 10: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Why the guidance document is needed?

• In financial terms, a bankable project would usually refer to a project that lenders are willing to finance since there will be a financial return on the investment. However, in the aid context, a bankable Aid for Trade project is one which development partners are willing to fund since they are guaranteed a positive and sufficient effect on the capacity of the beneficiary.

• A bankable project could be described as a “good quality project [expected to deliver desired results] addressing relevant needs and falling inside the development partner priorities at the right time”.

Page 11: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

What makes a project/programme Aid for Trade

Aid for Trade is divided into the following broad categories. Some projects and programmes within these categories may not be primarily considered through a trade-lens (i.e. trade objectives and outcomes tangential/indirect):

•Trade policy and regulations: trade policy and administrative management; trade facilitation; regional trade agreements; multilateral trade negotiations; and trade education/training.

•Economic infrastructure: transport and storage; communications; and energy generation and supply.

•Building productive capacity, including trade development: agriculture; fishing; forestry; industry; mineral resources and mining; tourism; business and other services; and, banking and financial services.

•Trade-related adjustment

Page 12: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Key drivers of effective Aid for Trade• It is targeted at reducing the cost of trading through, for

example, investments in infrastructure, transport and trade facilitation

• When Aid for Trade investments are integrated into a country’s broader trade policy and strategy framework, building sustainability

• Aid for Trade is demand-driven, responding to the needs of recipient countries

• It focuses on the most binding constraints to trade• There is political will and Aid for Trade champions• There is good sequencing of reforms and projects and

programmes in the design and implementation of Aid for Trade

• There is effective coordination and complementarity around the design, implementation and M&E of projects and programmes

Page 13: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Key drivers of effective Aid for Trade• The selection of instruments and modalities for

delivering Aid for Trade are able to address trade-related constraints at the regional level and not just targeting individual countries.

• A clear, well articulated and realistic results chain and theory of change is developed that links activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts (the achievement of objectives can be traced along a feasible results chain) with SMART indicators and baseline data available.

If a proposal for funding can demonstrate that the potential project/programme can deliver on some or all of the above then arguably it has a much better chance of receiving funding.

Page 14: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Developing a sound business case (1)• As with any finite resource, there is

competition for Aid for Trade resources. Priorities need to be established and choices made.

• Securing support requires a carefully considered and well argued ‘business case’ or ‘pitch’ that appeals to the funder.

• The case needs to demonstrate that allocating resources to any particular programme, project or activity is an investment rather than merely a cost.

• Naturally, the more complex the programme the greater the effort required to prepare the business case.

Page 15: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Developing a sound business case (2)Some tips for developing a sound business case (from the WB Border Management Modernisation 2011):•Describing and contextualising problems, issues and consequences•Description of how the proposed solutions will solve the problems identified•Justifying the project through quantitative and qualitative analysis•Demonstrating a capacity to succeed•A careful, realistic identification of risks to success and mitigating strategies•Accurate estimates of required resources•Objective performance measures to allow accurate progress monitoring•Appropriate governance, management and supervision mechanisms

Page 16: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Formulating bankable projects and programmes

Bankable project or

programme

Identification and preparation

Design and appraisal

M&E

Page 17: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

1. Identification and preparation (1)• During the identification and preparation stage,

analysis of the current context (situational analysis, diagnostics, etc.) and a needs assessment should be undertaken to identify key challenges/constraints and priority intervention areas.

• Sets the scene: provides the relevant context on why support is needed and indicates the nature of potential support.

Page 18: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Diagnostics and toolkitsSummary of tools:• Stakeholder consultations• Benchmarking• Diagnostic Trade Integration Studies (DTISs)• World Bank toolkits:– Trade and Transport Facilitation Assessment– Trade Competiveness Diagnostic Toolkit– Trade Corridor Management Toolkit– Border Management Modernisation Toolkit– Freight Transport Toolkit– Port Reform Toolkit

• Corridor diagnostics studies (e.g. Corridor Diagnostic Study of N and C Corridors) and border audits

• UNDP Aid for Trade needs assessment guide• Value chain analysis• Growth diagnostics

Page 19: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Growth diagnostics adjusted for trade

Page 20: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

1. Identification and preparation (2)• Each investor has a different approach to project

and programme formulation• Some will agree a simple proposal, application or

concept note without detailed diagnosis of the problem (that would come later during design once the development partner has agreed to fund the project/programme in principle)

• ….whereas others would expect a detailed proposal backed by quantifiable evidence drawing on existing diagnostic studies before pursuing design work

• Any requests for support will be much stronger if demonstrated through the use of evidence (qualitative and quantitative)

Page 21: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Identification and preparation (3)• It is often difficult to identify which needs to

address at different points in time• Needs are numerous, multi-faceted, country-

specific and involve a broad range of diverse stakeholders

• The list of constraints that hinder trade expansion is typically long

• Resources are finite and all needs cannot be addressed immediately and simultaneously, nor should they

• In order to guide the effective identification and preparation, and subsequent design and implementation of AfT, the guidance document provides various tools to help prioritise and sequence

Page 22: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Identification and preparation (4)• Prioritisation, sequencing and packaging of a range of

interventions is critical to ensure they contribute coherently to the overall objectives (e.g. trade expansion) of a project or programme

• The prioritisation process may include:– Identifying the most binding constraints to trade– Identifying quick wins– Assessing costs vs. benefits– As well as timeliness (e.g. urgency)

• A combination of intervention areas may be appropriate (highest impact; quick wins; time-sensitive; cost effective)

• Note that there is typically a trade-off between an optimal package of interventions and feasible (politically, financially, etc.) package of interventions.

Page 23: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Design and appraisal

• This stage is typically undertaken once a development partner or other investor has expressed an interest in funding the project/programme (once the concept note has been agreed or proposal accepted)

• Both the potential funder and the recipient are typically involved at this stage

Page 24: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Design and appraisal

• Economic appraisal (trade) including, for example, CBA of trade-related costs and benefits

• Infrastructure and transport (costs, traffic flows, etc..) appraisals (from a trade lens)

• Social appraisal including, for example, PSIA/PIA• Political appraisal• Environmental appraisal (e.g. environmental

impact of building a road, border posts, port, etc)

The findings of any earlier diagnostic toolkits will typically feed in here, or be undertaken at this stage .

Page 25: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

M&E: Theory of change, intervention logic and performance frameworks

The document includes guidance on: • Developing the intervention logic and

results chain for a project and programme• Including exploring the causal linkages

using Theory of Change analysis• And preparation of performance

frameworks (e.g. logframes) and the use of indicators

Page 26: Session Three:  Formulation of  AfT  bankable  projects

Developing concept notesThe Arab Maghreb Union:• Technical assistance to the Union for

Coordination of Infrastructure and Trade Facilitation

• Feasibility study of future Single Border Posts• Study for the harmonisation of customs

procedure• Feasibility study on establishing a Corridor

Management Committee• Feasibility study on establishing an

Observatory of Malpractice along the corridor