Presenter: Asta Y.Z. Lord Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: March 21, 2009
Session Chair / Co-Presenter: Richard Yam, International Student Advisor
description
Transcript of Session Chair / Co-Presenter: Richard Yam, International Student Advisor
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 1
Return on Investment in International Recruitment: A
Qualitative Study
NAFSA Conference | Minneapolis | 31 May 2007
Session Chair / Co-Presenter: Richard Yam, International Student Advisor
University of Massachusetts – Amherst [email protected]
Co-Presenters: Cheryl Darrup-Boychuck, C.I.E.O.
USjournal.com, [email protected]
Ted McKown, Director of International Admissions
Kent State University, [email protected]
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 2
Why study ROI? Why now?
The challenges posed by the events of 9/11 changed the world, and international recruitment as we know it.
The 9/11 Effect:• Declining number of international students• Slowing enrollment• Perspectives of visa policy
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 3
Crisis in Chinese
危 = danger機 = opportunity
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 4
International Student Enrollment Trends,1955 through 2006
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 5
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 6
GAO Report, January 2007(Government Accountability
Office)
Global Competitiveness: Implications for the Nation’s Higher Education
System
Sample Recommendations:• Collecting qualitative data that could provide valuable context for quantitative data. • Developing uniform, consensus-based social and economic indicators of U.S. higher education’s competitiveness.
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 7
Limited Research Available in Measuring Return on
Investment• NAFSA: International Enrollment Management Survey (Jan ‘07)• ACE: Measuring Internationalization Survey (‘01, ‘03)• Noel–Levitz:
• National Enrollment Management Study (‘04)• Cost of Recruiting Report (‘05)
• Reza, Corriveau, Gogerty, Blanchford, and Yam:
• International Recruitment Effectiveness Survey (‘06), presented in Montreal
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 8
Highlights of the 2006 Study: A Quantitative Approach
Most Effective Recruiting Activities:1. Merit Scholarships2. International Brochures3. Interviews4. Articulation Agreements5. Express Mail of Acceptance Letters6. Independent Travel (Fall)7. Small Group / Tour Travel (Fall)8. Information Sessions
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 9
NACAC Admission Trends Survey, 2005
Please provide the “total admission budget” dollar amount from which we will determine average costs based on your responses to questions.
a. Number of completed applications ___
b. Number of full-time first year, degree seeking students ___
c. Number of full-time first year, degree-seeking students who enrolled ___
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 10
NACAC Admission TrendsSurvey 2005 (continued)
Which of the following were included in the calculation of your institution’s “total admission budget”?
___ Admission staff salaries___ Admission staff benefits___ Staff travel expenses for recruitment___ Expenses for participation in college fairs
and other recruitment events___ Publication expenses___ Payments made to third party contractors for
admission or recruitment services___ Institutional financial aid ___ Other (advertising, supplies, postage…)
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 11
Studying ROI: A Domestic Perspective
NACAC Admission Trends Survey, 2005
(Average cost per enrolled student, based on domestic recruitment)
$2,167 = Private institutions
$1,753 = Overall average
$667 = Public institutions
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 12
NACAC Admissions Trends, 2005based on Campus Selectivity
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 13
NACAC Admissions Trends, 2005
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 14
Current State of Studying International Recruitment / ROI
Measurement Myopia
• U.S. News and World Report Controversy
• Administrators demand numerical justification for recruitment expenses
• Corporatization of U.S. higher education:
Dean of Admission -->V.P. of Enrollment
Management
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 15
Studying ROI:Corporate World vs Higher
Education
Initial Investment vs Subsequent Profits
Recruiting Expenses vs Profits, where Profits = Tuition
– Cost of Instruction+ Expected Donations
Flaw: Tuition < Cost of Instruction, so Profits are usually negative
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 16
Current Trends in Studying ROI / International Student
Recruitment
Estimate Admissions Yield
from recruiting in different
countries or regions
Yield = Number of newly-enrolled students
per dollar of recruitment expenses
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 17
Evolution from Enrollment Funnelto Admissions Cylinder
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 18
Securing Pure Data: The Perspective of a Statistician
• Survey the prospective students,to eliminate any bias of the recruiters
• Linear Regression: Predict a dependent variable (likelihood of enrolling) based on several independent variables, such as the different types of recruitment
• Topic for a Thesis?
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 19
Multivariate Likelihood Function to Predict Customer Behavior
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 20
Design of the 2007 Qualitative Study on Measuring
ROI
• In-depth Interviews -- 1 to 1-1/2 hours each• Interview Topics -- Plans, implementation, evaluation• Sampling -- Open Doors, successful or challenging institutions, availability
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 21
The 2007 Study: Comments from a colleague who declined to
participate
I find it tough to justify putting other projects aside to be involved in this one… Frankly, you may find that people who have 2 to 3 hours to devote to this may not be the most effective recruiters. As such, your sample (and study) may be at risk…
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 22
Profile of 19 Participating Schools:
A Diverse Representation in the U.S.
• 2 Specialized Institutions • 3 Language Institutes• 2 Community Colleges• 2 Baccalaureate Institutions • 3 Masters Institutions• 5 Doctoral / Research Institutions• 2 Boarding / Prep Schools
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 23
Geographic Representation of18 Participating Schools
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 24
Profile of 21 Individual Participants
• 322 total years in international education• Average of 15 years in the industry• 11 male and 10 female participants• 14 Directors or Vice Presidents
- Institutional Advancement- Enrollment Management
• 3 Associate Directors• 3 Marketing Coordinators or Recruiters• 1 International Student Advisor
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 25
Profile of 21 Individual Participants:
Years in International Education
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 26
Results of the 2007 Study: Attitudes toward ROI
a. Realistic / Pragmatic: Know howQuantifiable / Tangible: Count inquiries, applications, deposits, enrollments, attrition, retention, graduation, alumni
b. Philosophical: Know whyBig Picture / Intangible: Value judgments in determining how and where to invest, based on institution’s mission of internationalization
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 27
Results of the 2007 ROI Study: Defining Return on Investment
Types of Investment: • Infrastructure / Staffing• Travel (Domestic and Overseas)• Financial Aid / Scholarships• Long-term Prospects• Agents / Commission-based Options• Online / Print Promotions• Postage / Mailing Lists• Special Scenarios / Emerging Markets• Targeted Yield Activities
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 28
Types of Investment: Infrastructure / Staffing
Responsibility for International Recruitment• Enrollment Management• International Student Services• International Affairs / Programs• Other Support Offices
Holistic approaches throughout the infrastructure seem more effective, when recruitment is integrated to cultivate the student’s entire experience.
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 29
Types of Investment: Travel (Overseas and Domestic)
Overseas Travel• Group Tours / Large Public Events• Small Tours / Targeted Private Events• Individual / One-on-One Visits
Domestic Travel• Embassy Visits (generated highest ROI for one of our participants)• Conferences / Agent Workshops
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 30
Types of Investment: Financial Aid / Scholarships
Most colleagues have limited funds to disburse, so they’re getting more creative: • $50 in tuition reduction for referrals• Special Pricing, i.e., fees are waived if MBA students pay tuition in advance• Re-packaging existing programs: A price tag of $19,985. looks better than $20,015.• Work more closely with grad schools on assistantships for international students
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 31
Types of Investment: Long-Term Prospects
Projects that don’t pay off immediately, sometimes due to cultural issues• Articulation agreements • “Twinning”• Joint Degree Programs• Sister Schools• Overseas Campuses
“We’re establishing a pipeline for supplying students over several years.”
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 32
Types of Investment: Agents / Commission-based
Options • Very little middle-ground: Love / Hate• Agent-only access via .edu domains • Private language schools: More likely to engage agents than public institutions• Institutions that are more transparent (i.e., fewer layers of bureaucracy) seemed better equipped to use agents • The initial cost of engaging agents must be greater than zero (i.e., preparing for and maintaining a successful relationship)
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 33
Types of Investment: Online / Print Promotions
Interviewer: How did you find out about us? Student: In a magazine. Interviewer: Which one? In the one that cost me $100 or the one that cost $1,000?Conclusion: Difficult to track accurately----------------------------------------------------Technology allows for better tracking -- One participant is hiring a Director of Electronic Marketing, specifically for international student recruitment
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 34
Types of Investment: Postage / Mailing Lists
• Express Mail I-20 / Letters of Acceptance• Few purchased names and addresses• Few mentioned sending brochures to -- EducationUSA Advising Centers -- U.S. Embassies and Consular Offices -- International High Schools -- American Schools Overseas
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 35
Types of Investment: Special Scenarios / Emerging
Markets • Smaller, private schools seemed more willing to experiment in emerging markets; diversity was one of their primary goals• Language schools seemed more interested in the numbers of students recruited, rather than diversity, so they tend to stick with the top sending countries • Other successful recruitment plans take advantage of unique situations that percolate via global involvement from the campus’ academic departments
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 36
Types of Investment: Other Targeted Yield Activities
• Connect prospects and / or parents with campus-related people with common interests (language, home country, major) -- Phone calls / Skype -- eCorrespondence (eMail, chat, blog…)• Hosting the influencers on campus -- Coordinated campus tours -- Various summer camps• Engage Alumni Networks / Receptions• Plan to “Respond on Demand”
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 37
Characteristics of Successful International Recruitment
Programs• Institutional Commitment / Mission• Organizational Infrastructure• Travel (Overseas and Domestic)• Emphasize both Recruiting and Yield
Activities to complement each other• Emphasize Long-term Prospects• Financial Aid / Merit Scholarship /
Pricing• Use Agents Prudently• Explore Emerging Markets• Determine Quality and Quantity Returns
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 38
Recommendations for Future Studies
• Concentrate on Specific Subsets:• Language Schools• Graduate Schools (MBA, etc.)• International Student Athletes
• Conduct Industry-Wide Surveys:• Cost-to-Recruit Survey• Factors to Enroll
• Interview Prospective Students• Develop a Linear Regression Model
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 39
Where do we go from here?There’s no magic formula (yet).
Continue the ROI conversation via NAFSA’s Marketing / Recruiting Network:
• Go to http://www.nafsa.org/ • Click Knowledge Community Networks and Resources on the left• Click Recruitment, Admissions, and Preparation on the left • Click Marketing and Recruiting on the left • Click Discussion Forums on the left • Click Measuring ROI and contribute!
Measuring ROI, 31 May 2007 40
Return on Investment in International Recruitment: A
Qualitative Study
NAFSA Conference | Minneapolis | 31 May 2007
Session Chair / Co-Presenter: Richard Yam, International Student Advisor
University of Massachusetts – Amherst [email protected]
Co-Presenters: Cheryl Darrup-Boychuck, C.I.E.O.
USjournal.com, [email protected]
Ted McKown, Director of International Admissions
Kent State University, [email protected]