Session 5_001 Hayek
description
Transcript of Session 5_001 Hayek
www.cclint.com
VERTICAL POST TENSIONINGthe River House Project
Carol Hayek, PhD, MBAChief Technical Officer, CCL
www.cclint.com
• The Project• Shear walls design and reasons for
vertical post-tensioning• PT wall solution• Calculation of PT losses• Detailing• Constructability
Outline
www.cclint.comwww.cclint.com
River House Project
Project Team• Structural Engineer: URS Corporation• Concrete Contractor: Kent Companies• Post Tensioning Supplier: CCL USAGrand rapids, MI
All post-tensioned concrete 38 storybuilding• Unbonded post-tensioned flat slab• Bonded post-tensioned transfer
girders with CCL-12 strand anchor system and multiple stressing stages
• Bonded post-tensioned vertical walls using CCL-4 strand anchor system
www.cclint.com
Shear WallsLine
11
Line
7
Varying Geometry
River House ProjectFloor Plan
www.cclint.com
Shear Wall Design
• Finite element model was used• Approx 500 load cases• Wind Load
Basic load 90mph• Reinforced concrete shear walls
High drift and excessive tension
Lateral Stability Modeling
www.cclint.com
Shear Wall Design
• Options and limitations of reinforced concrete walls– Adding shear walls or increasing shear wall sizes
“not an option” due to:→ Architectural requirement→ High real estate value
– Adding rebar… already congested– Increasing concrete strength… f’c=8,000psi
• Alternative– Use of Post-Tensioning
Possible Solutions
www.cclint.com
Reasons for PT
• Adds axial compression to counteract tensile stresses
• Use uncracked section• Less rebar quantity, less congestion…• Can handle variable wall geometry
Advantages of PT
www.cclint.com
PT Walls Solution
• Design of walls using bonded system
• Optimal use of PT: only where needed
• Incremental PT forces varying from 500k to 1670k
• PT walls from ground to 9th floor
• RC walls for upper floors
PT Forces in Wall
www.cclint.com
PT Loss Calculation
• Calculation of prestress losses to obtain the effective PT force per tendon– Friction Losses– Long Term Losses
Calculation of PT Losses
www.cclint.com
PT Loss Calculation
• Angular friction loss in 3D dimensions (x,y,z)
• Wobble loss as a function of tendon length
• PT force at point x
• Seating Loss
)zyxk)((gsinstresx
222
ePP +++β+αµ−=
Loss factor
xy z
Shift of PT from circular column to wall
Friction Losses
www.cclint.com
• Typical losses due to prestressing• Elastic Shortening of concrete• Creep of concrete• Shrinkage of concrete• Strand Relaxation
• Loss due to axial deformation caused by dead load weight on wall
Long Term LossesPT Loss Calculation
www.cclint.com
Stress-Strain relationship with εsteel proportional to εconcrete
– Elastic Shortening ES (same for unbonded and non-grouted bonded tendons)
• Loss due to prestressing depends on average precompression
ESPT= Es εs with εs = Ke ( fcpa / Eci )
• Loss due to axial deformation
ESDL= Es εDL with εDL = (∆DL / L)
Es = Modulus of Elasticity of the PT steel
∆DL = Axial deformation due to dead loadL = Total length of tendon
Elastic ShorteningPT Loss Calculation
www.cclint.com
– Creep CR• Loss due to prestressing CRPT= Kc Es ((fci – fsd) / Ec)
• Loss due to axial deformation in building CRDL= Kc Es (∆DL / L)
– Loss due to shrinkage of concreteSH = 8.2x10-6 Ksh Es (1-0.06 V/S )(100-RH)
– Loss due to relaxation of tendon RE = Kr*C –[J*(ESPT+CRPT+ESDL+CRDL+SH)]*C
Creep, Shrinkage and RelaxationPT Loss Calculation
PT Losses
www.cclint.com
Long Term Loss ValuesPT Loss Calculation
Tendons ∆DL fcpa ESPT ESDL CRPT CRDL SH RE Total Long Term Losses
in psi ksi ksi ksi ksi ksi ksi ksi
SHEAR WALL ON GRIDLINE 11A, B,C,D 0.28 710 2.8 11.0 6.6 18.6 2.7 3.3 45.0F, G, K, L 0.28 710 2.8 8.9 6.6 15.1 2.7 3.6 39.6E, H, J, M 0.28 710 2.8 7.5 6.6 12.7 2.7 3.7 35.9
SHEAR WALL ON GRIDLINE 7N 0.15 162 0.6 9.4 1.5 16.0 2.7 3.8 34.0A, B 0.17 162 0.6 8.7 1.5 14.8 2.7 3.9 32.2A, B, C, D 0.17 237 0.7 3.2 1.6 5.4 2.7 4.5 17.9A, B, C, D 0.37 168 0.9 14.5 2.2 24.6 2.7 3.2 48.1A, B,C,D 0.37 669 2.6 9.3 6.2 15.9 2.7 3.5 40.2F, G, K, L 0.37 669 2.6 8.1 6.2 13.8 2.7 3.7 37.0E, H, J, M 0.37 669 2.6 7.4 6.2 12.6 2.7 3.7 35.2
www.cclint.com
Percentage Values are with respect to jacking force Losses due to axial load vary from 4% to 17%
Total LossesPT Loss Calculation
Tendons Tendon Length
Loss due to friction
LT Loss due to
Prestressing
LT Loss due to Axial DL
Deformation
Total Losses
Loss due to friction
LT Loss due to
Prestressing
LT Loss due to Axial DL
Deformation Total Losses
kip kip kip kip % % % %
SHEAR WALL ON GRIDLINE 11A, B,C,D 60 6 4 6 16 12% 8% 13% 33%F, G, K, L 74 6 4 5 15 14% 8% 11% 32%E, H, J, M 88 7 4 4 14 14% 8% 9% 31%
SHEAR WALL ON GRIDLINE 7N 37 5 2 5 12 11% 4% 11% 27%A, B 46 5 2 5 12 10% 4% 10% 25%A, B, C, D 126 6 2 2 10 13% 5% 4% 21%A, B, C, D 60 6 2 8 16 12% 5% 17% 34%A, B,C,D 93 6 4 5 15 14% 7% 11% 32%F, G, K, L 107 7 4 5 15 14% 7% 10% 31%E, H, J, M 117 7 4 4 15 16% 7% 9% 32%
Average 13% 6% 11% 30%
www.cclint.com
PT Detailing
• PT system that accommodates variable wall sections and geometry
• Multi-strand CCL anchors of 4x0.6” strand• Small size anchors and ducts to fit in walls and allow
profile deviations2” duct diameter ~ 3.5 x strand area
• Mutli-strand stressing equipment easy to handle • Grouting in one operation
PT System
www.cclint.com
PT Detailing
• Every tendon is labeled• Tendons are staggered• Tendons are stopped incrementally• Anchors typically stopped at slab
soffit to avoid blockouts
Sample Sections and Elevations
www.cclint.com
• Special consideration to sweep around openings– High Concentration of PT forces – Deviation forces need to be considered
• Pressure due to curvature– Deviation force (radial force) q = P/R per unit length
• Rebar needed– Anchoring of 25% is
requiredA = 25% q / (0.6 fy)
Curving of TendonsPT Detailing
www.cclint.com
Anchors Detailing at BlockoutsPT Detailing
Typical sections
Transverse section
Front View
www.cclint.com
Constructability
• Installation procedure and tolerances• Stressing procedure• Grouting procedure• Field records
Detailed Method Statement
www.cclint.com
InstallationConstructability
www.cclint.com
• Stressing to be done from top of wall• Anchors at bottom of wall used as accessible
dead ends• Anchors at top of wall used as stressing end• Anchors stopped at slab soffit to avoid
encasements• Multi-strand simultaneous stressing to control
intertwining of strands
Constructability
Stressing
www.cclint.com
• Grout to be done by qualified personnel• Grouting for vertical tendons to start from
bottom• Grout vents placed at every floor• One-way flow of grouting should be maintained• Maintain grout pressure after ducts are filled
GroutingConstructability
www.cclint.com
• Strand installation• Stressing records• Grout mix records• Grouting records
Field RecordsConstructability
www.cclint.com
• Generally no problem• PT and rebar interference problems were held to
a minimum• Grouting went fine with vents being filled per
procedure requirement• Blockouts at dead end side were tight but
workable
Field FeedbackConstructability
www.cclint.com
Conclusion• Vertical PT is a viable solution for lateral
stability• Vertical PT is a suited option for walls with
varying geometry• Understanding of PT losses is necessary• Thorough detailing is needed• Detailed construction method statements
www.cclint.com
URS: Dave Stek, PE, SE(IL), LEED®APCalvin College: Leonard P. De Rooy, P.E. Kent Companies: Dave Turner, PE
Acknowledgments
www.cclint.com
THANK YOU!