Session 3- Part 2 of 3

DigiSRII: Asia-Pacific results

Witada Anukoonwattaka, Economic Affairs Officer Richard Sean Lobo, ConsultantTrade Policy and Facilitation SectionTrade, Investment and Innovation Division

DigiSRII: Results and interpretation for Asia-Pacific

DigiSRII overall performance by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

BhutanBangladesh

FijiCambodia

KyrgyzstanPakistanMongoliaLao PDRSri Lanka

KazakhstanRussian Federation

IndonesiaBrunei Darussalam

IndiaTurkey

PhilippinesViet NamThailandAustralia

ChinaMalaysia

Republic of KoreaJapan

Singapore

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Index value

Direction of change between periods

Increaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• The region has become more integrated over 2010-2017.

• ENEA and SEA economies are among the most integrated.

• SSWA and NCA economies are among the least integrated

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

Pakistan

Russian Federation

Lao PDR

Turkey

Philippines

India

Indonesia

China

Australia

Viet Nam

Japan

Thailand

Republic of Korea

Malaysia

Singapore

0.4 0.5 0.6Index value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17

Conventional integration Sustainable integration

<=25

thpct

26-74thpct

>=75

thpct

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

Kazakhstan

Indonesia

Viet Nam

India

Russian Federation

Turkey

Philippines

Thailand

Malaysia

China

Australia

Singapore

Republic of Korea

Japan

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Index value

Direction of change between periods

Increaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17

Overall Regional Integration (Asia-Pacific)

Trade and investment

Conventional integration

RVCFinance Infrastructure People

Sustainable integration

Regulatory cooperation

Digital economy

Average value, 2010-13

Average value, 2014-17

Size of bars reflect progress over time(smaller=less, larger=more)

Shade of bars reflect level of integration(lighter=less, darker=more)

0.36 -0.38 0.57 - 0.60 0.49 - 0.49

0.47 - 0.56

0.11 - 0.120.45 - 0.50 0.38 - 0.46

0.45 - 0.50

0.30 - 0.31 0.49 - 0.510.46 - 0.45

0.61 - 0.670.04 - 0.04

0.59 - 0.65 0.46 - 0.51

0.48 - 0.52 0.72 - 0.760.54 - 0.54

0.56 - 0.660.16 - 0.19

0.44 - 0.510.34 - 0.47

0.46 -0.52

0.42 - 0.45

Movement of people

Trade and

investment

Value chain

Digital economy

Finance

Regulatory cooperation

Infrastructure

0.2 0.4 0.6Dimensional value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Dimension average values: 2010−13 vs 2014−17

Sustainable movement

of people

Sustainable digital

economy

Sustainable regulatory

cooperation

Sustainable trade and

investment

Sustainable value chain

Sustainable infrastructure

Sustainable finance

0.2 0.4 0.6Dimensional value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Dimension average values: 2010−13 vs 2014−17

Conventional integration Sustainable integration

Trade and investment integration, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

BhutanBangladesh

PakistanNepalIndia

FijiSri LankaIndonesia

Russian FederationAustralia

CambodiaTurkey

KazakhstanKyrgyzstan

Lao PDRChina

Brunei DarussalamPhilippines

Republic of KoreaMongolia

JapanViet NamThailandMalaysia

Singapore

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Index value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• Singapore is the most integrated economy.

• ENEA and SEA economies are among the most integrated.

• Lao PDR and Cambodia made notable progress.

• SSWA economies are among the least integrated.

Financial integration, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

Lao PDRMaldives

KyrgyzstanRussian Federation

PakistanBangladesh

FijiKazakhstan

Sri LankaIran

MongoliaViet Nam

PhilippinesMalaysia

IndonesiaTurkey

New ZealandIndia

ChinaJapan

Republic of KoreaThailandAustralia

SingaporeHong Kong, China

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8Index value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• Advanced economies in

the region are among the most integrated.

• Most notable among them are the regional financial hubs: Hong Kong, China and Singapore.

• Viet Nam and Indonesia made good progress.

Regional value chain (RVC) integration, by economy

• The region made limited progress in RVC integration.

• Japan is the most integrated economy.

• ENEA and SEA economies are among the most integrated.

• China and Cambodia made notable progress.

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

Kazakhstan

Cambodia

Turkey

Brunei Darussalam

Russian Federation

Viet Nam

China

Australia

India

Thailand

Indonesia

Malaysia

Philippines

Singapore

Hong Kong, China

Republic of Korea

Japan

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Index value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17

Infrastructure integration, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

SamoaMongoliaMyanmar

KyrgyzstanNepal

BangladeshCambodiaLao PDR

AzerbaijanKazakhstan

PakistanMaldives

FijiArmenia

IndonesiaSri Lanka

Brunei DarussalamPhilippines

ThailandRussian Federation

TurkeyIndia

Viet NamNew Zealand

JapanRepublic of Korea

AustraliaChina

MalaysiaSingapore

0.4 0.6 0.8Index value

Direction of change between periods

Increaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• The region made good progress in infrastructure integration.

• Singapore is the top performer.

• Lao PDR and Cambodia stand out for their progress.

• ENEA, SEA and developed economies are among the most integrated.

• LLDCs in SSWA and NCA and PIDEs are among the least integrated.

Movement of people, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

TurkeyTurkmenistan

IranPakistan

Russian FederationAfghanistan

Lao PDRCambodiaMyanmar

BangladeshAzerbaijanIndonesia

Micronesia (Fed. States of)Malaysia

FijiTimor−Leste

KiribatiPapua New Guinea

KazakhstanIndia

Marshall IslandsNew Zealand

MaldivesUzbekistan

BhutanRepublic of Korea

GuamViet Nam

SingaporeGeorgia

Brunei DarussalamMongolia

American SamoaNorthern Marianas Islands

TuvaluPalau

Hong Kong, ChinaNepal

ArmeniaAustralia

KyrgyzstanChina

PhilippinesTonga

SamoaThailand

Macao, ChinaTajikistan

JapanSri Lanka

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Index value

Direction of change between periods

DecreaseIncreaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• Significant variation in performance across the region.

• Sri Lanka is the most integrated economy.

• Japan stands out for its progress.

• No discernible sub-regional trend.

Regulatory cooperation, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

NepalAfghanistanKyrgyzstan

Papua New GuineaTajikistan

PhilippinesKazakhstan

CambodiaSri Lanka

BangladeshRussian Federation

PakistanLao PDRMyanmar

ChinaBrunei Darussalam

AustraliaIndonesia

IndiaNew Zealand

TurkeyViet NamThailandMalaysia

Republic of KoreaJapan

Singapore

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Index value

Direction of change between periods

Increaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• The region made good progress in regulatory cooperation.

• Singapore is the most integrated economy.

• Advanced ENEA and SEA economies are among the most integrated.

• LLDCs in SSWA and NCA are among the least integrated.

Digital economy integration, by economy

2010−13 average 2014−17 average

PakistanCambodiaMyanmarLao PDR

IndiaIndonesiaViet Nam

TurkeyPhilippines

Russian FederationThailand

ChinaMalaysia

JapanHong Kong, China

AustraliaNew Zealand

Republic of KoreaSingapore

0.2 0.4 0.6Index value

Direction of change between periods

Increaseyears_2010_13years_2014_17

Index Change: 2010−13 vs 2014−17• The region made good progress in digital economy integration.

• Singapore is the most integrated economy.

• Advanced economies in ENEA, SEA and the Pacific are the most integrated.

• ASEAN CLM and SSWA economies are among the least integrated

Thank you and see you back in part 3