Session 3-Election Contests

download Session 3-Election Contests

of 106

Transcript of Session 3-Election Contests

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    1/106

    Session 3

    HANDLING ELECTION

    CONTESTS UNDER THE PCOSAUTOMATED ELECTION

    SYSTEM

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    2/106

    At the end of the session, theparticipants are expected to:

    Understand the applicable substantive andprocedural laws in handling election contestsunder a PCOS Automated Election System;

    Understand techniques in discovering electoralfraud in light of the automation of the elections;available modes of disposition of cases; sourcingexperts in technical issues on genuineness ofballots, and how to detect paper securities andprinting securities on the ballot;

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    3/106

    Develop skills in handling delay

    maneuvers during trial for the efficient and

    effective disposition of election contests.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    4/106

    Election Protest Under

    2010 Automated Election

    TERESITA DY-L IACCO FLORES

    Retired Justice, COURT OF APPEALS

    Retired Commissioner, COMELEC

    Consultant, PHILJA

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    5/106

    You shall not act dishonestly in rendering judgment. Show

    neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty,

    but judge your fellowmen justly.Verse 15

    Leviticus 1

    A Judge's Prayer

    ...of thy infinite mercy so direct anddispose of my heart as a Judge that I maythis day fulfil all my duty in thy fear and

    fall into no error of judgment...

    Edward Ryan

    5

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    6/106

    RULES OF PROCEDURE

    FOR REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS

    IN ELECTION CONTESTS

    IN AN AUTOMATED ELECTION SYSTEM

    USING PRECINCT COUNT OPTICAL SCAN

    Municipal Positions Covered:

    Mayor

    Vice mayor

    SagguniangBayan Members

    6

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    7/106

    Automated Election System in the 2010Election

    The election system whereby an optical ballot scanner,called Precinct Count Optical Scan or PCOS, isprovided in Precinctsor Clustered Precincts into whichoptical scan paper ballots marked by hand by the voterare inserted to be counted.

    The PCOS, after the voting closes in the precinct,consolidates the votes, prints the election returns andtransmits the election results electronically to 3 servers:server in the Municipal/City/District Board ofCanvassers, the server of the dominant majority anddominant minority parties, KapisananngmgaBroadcasters ngPilipinas (KBP) and accredited citizensarms authorised to do a parallel count and to the serverin the COMELEC.

    7

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    8/106

    Official Ballots

    the paper ballot with the pre-printed names of all

    candidates

    with ovals corresponding to each of the namesprinted

    the ovals are the spaces where voters expresstheir choice through marking or shading using a

    marking pen

    8

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    9/106

    Picture Image of the Ballot

    the Image of the Ballot

    captured by the PCOS machine at thetime the voter feeds his/her ballots

    which image is later stored in a memoryor removable data storage.

    9

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    10/106

    Election Returns

    the document in electronic or printed

    form, printed by the PCOS on a

    paper showing the date of the

    election, the province, municipalityand precinct in which it is held, the

    votes in figures for each candidate in

    a precinct or clustered precincts.

    10

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    11/106

    Election Returns .

    The electronic election returns iselectronically transmitted from theclustered precinct to the server of the

    MBOC/CBOC, the server ofmajority/minority politicalparties/Kapisananngmga BroadcastersngPilipinas and accredited citizens

    arms authorised to do parallel countand to the server of the COMELEC.

    11

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    12/106

    refers to the mach ine used at the

    canvass proceedings to consolidate

    precinct results, municipal and cityresults, provincial results, as the

    case may be, for purposes of getting

    the total votes of all candidates at aparticular canvass level.

    12

    Consolidation Machine

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    13/106

    Statement of Votes by Precinct,

    Municipality, City, District, Province,

    or Overseas Absentee Voting (OAV)Station

    refers to a document in electronic and printed formgenerated by the canvassing or consolidating machines

    or computers during the canvass proceedings. This

    document records the votes obtained by candidates in

    each precinct, municipality, city, district, province, or OAVStation, as the case may be.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    14/106

    Municipal/City/Distrlct/Provincial certificate of canvass

    refers to a document in electronic and

    printed form containing the total votes infigures obtained by each candidate in a city-/municipality/district/ province, as the casemay be, the electronic form of which is theofficial canvass result in the aforementioned

    jurisdictions and is the one electronicallytransmitted to a higher canvass level.

    14

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    15/106

    Certificate of Canvass andProclamation

    refersto the off ic ial document in printed

    form that contains the name of all

    candidates who obtained the highest,

    number of votes in a particular

    constituency and certifies to said

    candidates' proclamation as winners.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    16/106

    Data Storage Device

    refers to the device where electronic documents are

    stored and from which said data may be obtainedwhen necessary to verify the accuracy andcorrectness of election data. It includes the back-upstorage device in which authentic electronic copies ofsaid data are also stored.

    Audit Log

    refersto the document that contains the list of allactivities performed by the PCOS machines from thetime that it was powered on, until the time it is

    powered off.

    16

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    17/106

    Electronic document

    refers to either the picture image of the

    ballots and electronic copies of the

    election returns, of certificates of canvass

    and of the other electronic data relative tothe processing done by the PCOS

    machines and the various consolidation

    machines.

    17

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    18/106

    Election Contests

    refer to:

    election protests,or

    petitions for quo warrantounder theOmnibus Election Code.

    18

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    19/106

    Election Protest

    A petition contesting the election and returns of electiveofficials, grounded on frauds or irregularities in the conductof the elections, the casting and counting of the ballotsand the preparation and canvassing of returns.

    Period to file: within ten(10) days from proclamation.

    N.B. The pendency of pre-proclamation controversyinvolving the validity of the proclamation asdefined by lawshall suspend the running of the period to file electionprotest.

    ISSUE- Who obtained the plurality of valid votes cast.

    19

    20

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    20/106

    Quo Warranto Under the Omnibus

    Election Code

    An election contest relating to the qualifications of an elected

    municipal official on the ground of ineligibility or disloyalty to

    the Republic of the Philippines.

    ISSUE - Whether respondent possesses all the qualifications

    for the position and none of the disqualifications prescribed by

    law.

    A decision in a disqualification case against a candidatefiled

    with the COMELEC before election does not constitute resjudicatain a case filed after election against the

    elected/proclaimed official in a quo warranto proceedings on

    the same ground or cause of action. Except when the SC, has

    affirmed the COMELEC decisions.

    20

    21

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    21/106

    Cases Excluded from Court

    Jurisdiction

    1) Cases anchored on the claim that anymember of the Municipal Board of

    Canvassers (MBOC) or any other Boardof Canvassers (BOC) or the Informationtechnology capable person assisting theMBOC or BOC do not possess legalqualification or appointment.

    21

    22

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    22/106

    Cases Excluded from Court Jurisdiction(cont)

    2)Cases anchored on the claim that there is/wasillegal proceedings of the MBOC or BOC orthat the canvassing is a sham or a moreceremony, of which the results are pre-

    determined and manipulated as when any ofthe following circumstances are present:

    a) Precipitate canvassing;

    b) Terrorism;

    c) Lack of sufficient notice to themembers of the MBOC;

    d) Improper venue.

    22

    23

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    23/106

    Election Protests and Quo

    Warranto

    How Initiated

    It shall be filed directly with the proper court in three

    legible copies plus such number of copiescorresponding to the number of protestees orrespondents.

    Each contest shall refer exclusively to one (1) office

    except in multi-positions, such as SangguniangBayanwhich may be consolidated in one case.

    23

    24

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    24/106

    Who May File Election Protest

    Any candidatewho was vo ted for the sameoff iceand who received the second o r th irdh ighest number of votes or, in a multi-slotposition, was among the next four candidatesfollowing the last-ranked winner duly proclaimed,as reflected in the official results of the electioncontained in the Statement of Votes by Precinct.

    An election protest shall not include a petition forquo warranto.

    Parties:

    Protestant and Protestee

    24

    25

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    25/106

    Who May File Petition for Quo

    Warranto Any registered voter who has voted in the election

    concerned.

    A petition for quo warrantoshall not include an

    election protest.

    Parties :

    Petitioner and Respondent

    25

    26

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    26/106

    Mandatory Raffle of Election

    Protest or Quo Warranto

    Cases with Notice to

    Parties Stating Date and

    Time Except in Single SalaStations

    26

    27

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    27/106

    Required Allegations of Initiatory

    Pleading in Election Protests

    Rule 2, Sec. 11

    Position Involved;

    That protestant was a candidate who has duly filed

    a Certificate of Candidacy and has been voted forthe same office;

    Date of Proclamation;

    Number of Votes Credited to the Parties Per

    Proclamation;

    Total Number of Precincts of the MunicipalityConcerned

    27

    28

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    28/106

    Required Allegations in Initiatory

    Pleading in Election Protests (cont)

    The protested precincts and the votes ofthe parties therein per the Statement ofVotes per Precinct; or

    If the votes of the parties are not specified,It shall contain an explanation why notspecified;

    Detailed specifications of the acts oromissions complained of showing theelectoral frauds, anomalies or irregularitiesin the protested precincts.

    28

    29

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    29/106

    Other Requirements

    Rule 2, Sec. 7

    Proper Verification;

    Certificate of Non-Forum Shopping.

    29

    30

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    30/106

    Summary Dismissal of Election ContestMotuPropr io ,

    on any of the following Grounds: The court has no jurisdiction over the subject

    matter;

    The election protest is insufficient in form and

    content as required in Section 11, Rule 2; The election protest is filed beyond the period

    prescribed in these Rules;

    The filing fee is not paid within the period forfiling the election protest, and

    In case of protest where a cash deposit isrequired, the cash deposit is not paid withinfive days from the filing of the protest.

    30

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    31/106

    32

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    32/106

    Things To Do After

    Filing of the Election Protest or

    Petition

    Upon Filing of the Election Protest or Petition

    Within 24 hours *

    Issue summons requiring protestee to fileanswer within five (5) days from receipt ofnotice

    Sec. 1, Rule 3

    32

    33

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    33/106

    Things To Do After

    Filing of the Election Protest or Petition

    (cont)

    Service of SummonsBy serving a copy of the summons

    protestee/respondent in person or in case of refusal

    to receive or sign for it, by tendering the same.

    33

    34

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    34/106

    Things To Do After

    Filing of the Petition (cont)

    Service of SummonsIf for justifiable causes, protestee/respondent cannot be

    served in person, service may be effected by leavingcopies of summons at:

    a) Residence of protestee/respondent as stated in theCertificate of candidacy with some person of suitableage and discretion residing therein; or,

    b) Office or regular place of business ofprotestee/respondent with some competent person incharge thereof.

    34

    35

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    35/106

    Things To Do After

    Filing of the Petition (cont)

    Issuance of PrecautionaryProtection Order

    Where the allegations in a protest so warrant, andsimultaneously with the issuance of summons, the court shallorder the municipal treasurer, election officer and other

    personnel and custodian concerned to take immediate stepsor measures to safeguard the integrity of all the memorycards, data storage devices containing electronic dataevidencing the conduct and results of election in thecontested precincts the ballot boxes with their keys, lists ofvoters with voting records, books of voters and otherdocuments or paraphernalia used in the election.

    (Sec. 1, Rule 8)

    35

    36

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    36/106

    Things To Do After

    Filing of the Petition (cont)

    Should there be a necessity for retrieval of all theforegoing paraphernalia, the order shall containa notice to parties of the date and time of

    retrieval with instruction that parties may sendrepresentatives to witness the activity but theirabsence shall not be a reason to postpone ordelay the activity.

    The Court when necessary may seek theassistance of PNP or AFP to ensure the safedelivery of the concerned paraphernalia.

    36

    37

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    37/106

    ANSWER (Rule 4)

    Verified ;

    May set forth admissions and specific denials,special and affirmative defenses, counterprotest and compulsory counterclaim;

    Allegations not specifically denied, deemedadmitted except un-liquidated damages andissues as to appreciation of ballots;

    Defenses and objections not pleaded aredeemed waived;

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    38/106

    Compulsory counterclaim or cross claim not

    set up barred;

    With proof of service of a copy upon theprotestee/respondent..

    39

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    39/106

    EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE ANSWER WITHIN THE

    TIME ALLOWED Rule 4, Sec. 4(C)

    When the election protest does not involve ballotrevision, and upon protestantsmotion and with notice toadverse counsel or party, the court shall proceed torender judgment on the basis of the allegations of theverified election protest granting the relief prayed for,

    unless the court in its discretion requires the protestantto submit evidence ex parte.

    If the election protest involves ballot revision,examination, verification or re-tabulation, the court shall

    order such revision of ballots or examination, verificationor re-tabulation of election returns and render judgmentbased thereon.

    40

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    40/106

    EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE ANSWER WITHIN THE

    TIME ALLOWED Rule 4, Sec. 4(C) (cont)

    For a failure of protestee to file Answer,

    only the protestant may participate inthe revision. The protestee or hisrepresentative may be present butwithout the right to register hiscomment.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    41/106

    42

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    42/106

    MOTION TO AMEND PLEADINGS

    Amendment in matters of form, such as a

    defect in the designation of the parties orother typographical or clerical errors may besummarily corrected at any stage of theproceedings on motion or motoproprio,provided no prejudice is caused thereby tothe adverse party

    Substantial amendments thata.Broaden the scope of the action orb.Introduce an additional cause or

    causes of actionmay be allowed ONLY upon leave of court.

    Leave maybe refused if motion is made withintent to delay.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    43/106

    PROHIBITED PLEADINGS ( t )44

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    44/106

    PROHIBITED PLEADINGS (cont)

    The court shall order within forty-eight (48) hours from receipt of theAnswer with counter-protest, if any, and whenever the allegations in aprotest or counter-protest so warrant, that the memory card of PCOS orother data storage devices containing electronic data evidencing theconduct and results of the election, hard copies of printed electionreturns,

    a. ballot boxes with their keys,b. lists of voters with voting records,

    c. books of voters andd. other documents or paraphernalia involved in theprotest or counter-protest, such as printed Certificateof canvass (COC), Certificate of Canvass andProclamation (COCP) and Statement of Votes byprecinct.

    be brought before it with notice to parties containing date andtime of retrieval from their respective custodians (Municipal

    Treasurer and Municipal Election Officer)

    Rule 8 Sec.2

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    45/106

    LITIGATIONEVENTS46

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    46/106

    LITIGATIONEVENTS

    A.Mandatory Preliminary Conference (Rule 9)

    Within three (3) days after filing of the last responsivepleading allowed by these Rules, or the expiration

    of the same period without any responsive

    pleading having been filed, the court shall conduct

    a mandatory preliminary conference among the

    parties to consider:

    1. The simplification of issues;

    2. The necessity or desirability of amendments to the

    pleadings;

    3. The possibility of obtaining stipulations or admission of

    facts and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof;

    4. The limitation of the number of witnesses.

    LITIGATIONEVENTS(cont )47

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    47/106

    LITIGATIONEVENTS(cont)

    5. The nature of the testimonies of the witnessesand whether they relate to evidence aliunde theballots, or otherwise

    6. The withdrawal of certain protested or counter-protested precincts (especially those where theballot boxes or ballots are unavailable or aremissing and cannot be located or destroyed dueto natural disasters or calamities)

    7. The number of revision committees to beconstituted8. The procedure to be followed in case the

    election protest or counter-protest seeks, whollyor partially, the examination, verification or re-tabulation of election returns; and

    9. Such other matters as may aid in the promptdisposition of the case.

    48

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    48/106

    Notice to counsel, or to party without

    counsel required;

    Presence of parties and counsel inpreliminary conference mandatory;

    Preliminary Conference Brief

    submission mandatory with service ofcopy to adverse counsel or party.

    49

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    49/106

    Contents of Preliminary

    Conference Brief

    1. summary of admitted facts and proposed stipulation offacts;

    2. issues to be tried or resolved;

    3. pre-marked documents or exhibits to be presented,stating their purpose;

    4. manifestation of their having availed or their intentionto avail themselves of discovery procedures or referralto commissioners;

    50

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    50/106

    Contents of Preliminary

    Conference Brief (cont)

    5. Number and names of the witnesses, their addresses, andthe substance of their respective testimonies. Thetestimonies of the witnesses shall be by affidavits inquestion and answer form as their direct testimonies,subject to oral cross examination;

    6. Manifestation of withdrawal of certain protested or counter-protested precincts, if such is the case;

    7. Proposed number of revision committees and names oftheir revisors and alternate revisors; and

    8. In case the election protest or counter-protest seeks theexamination, verification or re-tabulation of election returns,the procedure to be followed.

    51

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    51/106

    Failure to Appear At Preliminary Conference

    or

    Failure to File Preliminary

    Conference Brief with its required contentsare

    Causes for DISMISSAL,

    motuprop r io , of p rotest or coun ter -protest

    Sec. 6, Rule 9

    For fai lure of the protestee or co uns el to appear at theprel iminary conference, the cou rt may al low th e

    protestant to present evidence ex parte and renderjudgment based on the ev idence presen ted.

    52

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    52/106

    Preliminary Conference Order Within three (3) days following the date of the

    preliminary conference, the court shall issue anorder summarizing the matters taken up andstipulations or agreements reached during the

    conference.

    The court shall specify in the preliminaryconference order when the revision of ballots willcommence, which shall be within five (5) days

    from the termination of the preliminaryconference.

    53

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    53/106

    B.

    Revision of Ballots and

    Submission of Revisors Reports(Rule 10)

    Revision Committee Composition

    1. Chairperson (designated by the court from among its personnel);

    2. Protestantsrevisor (designated by protestant);3. Protesteesrevisor(designated by protestee).

    ** Parties shall designate their respective substitute revisors.**

    There shall be as many revision committees asmaybe necessary.

    54

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    54/106

    Place of Revision

    In the court premises or at such other place as may bedesignated by the court, but always under the courts strictsupervision.

    Duties of Revisors

    Revisors shall discharge their duties with the highest degree ofintegrity, conducting the proceedings with the same dignityand discipline as if undertaken by the court itself.

    Exercise extraordinary diligence and take precautionarymeasures to prevent the loss, disappearance or impairmentof the integrity of the ballots and election documents.

    55

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    55/106

    Compensation of Revisors

    Per Ballot Box - Php 700.00

    Itemized as follows:

    Chairman Php 400.00

    Protestants Revisor 150.00ProtesteesRevisor 150.00

    * Plus: Php 500.00 per day for each party revisor

    Above expenses are chargeable against the protestantscash deposit (Sec. 3, Rule 10)

    56

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    56/106

    Anyt ime before schedu l ing Revis ion of Bal lots,the court shal l inquire about the secur i ty

    markings on the bal lots and elect iondocuments from the COMELEC Chairman,who shal l be obl iged to indicate suchmarkings and o ther vi tal information that mayaid the cou rt and the reviso rs in determ iningthe authentici ty of bal lots and elect iondocuments. The part ies shall be no ti f ied ofthe resul ts of such inquiry.

    Order of Revision

    Revision of ballots shall start

    with those from the protested precincts.

    57

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    57/106

    Revision Committees Working HoursMonday to Friday, except on non-working holidays.

    8:30 AM to 12:00 noon, and 1:30 PM to 4:30PM

    With fifteen-minute (15) break allowed in

    each session.

    QUORUM : Chai rperson and a Party rev isor is enough quorum

    Revis ion to co nt inu e, even i f a party revisor is absentor late

    58

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    58/106

    If protesteesrevisoris absent or late for 30 minutes and noalternate appears as a substitute -- the revision shallproceed but protestee shall be deemed to have waived the

    right to appear and to object to the ballots in the precinct orprecincts scheduled for revision on that particular day.

    If the protestantsrevisor or the revisors of both parties andalternates fail to appear for no justifiable reason within onehour after fixed hours from the start of the revision -- the

    ballot boxes scheduled for revision on that day, and thecorresponding keys in the possession of the chairperson,shall be returned to the ballot box custodian of the courtand shall no longer be revised;

    It is understood that the parties waive their right to revise

    the same, and the chairperson concerned shall state suchfacts in the corresponding revision report.

    59

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    59/106

    Prohibited Access During theRevision

    Only the

    - judge,

    - clerk of court,- Three (3) members of the revisioncommittee,- parties and their duly authorized

    representatives

    shall have access to the revision area.

    C d t f R i i60

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    60/106

    Conduct of Revision

    On the day and venue indicated, TheRevision Committee shall convene.

    The following shall be the venue:

    a) Ballot boxes containing the ballots fromthe protested precincts;

    b) Data storage device used in the protested

    precincts be used to authenticate orassure genuineness of the ballots;

    Conduct of Revision (cont )61

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    61/106

    Conduct of Revision (cont)

    The Revision Committee, upon the request in writing of parties, will randomly pick the

    precinct from which they will do the recount.

    The revision of ballots shall be done manually and visually.

    Before the ballot box, the Revision Committee shall note:

    Before opening the ballot box, the recount committee shall note its condition as well asthat of the locks or locking mechanism and record the condition in the recount report.

    From its observation, the recount committee must also make a determination as to

    whether the integrity of the ballot box has been preserved.

    The ballot box shall then be opened and the ballots shall be taken out. Prior to the

    actual conduct: of the recount of the votes the recount committee must authenticate

    each and every ballot to make sure that they were the same ballots that were cast and

    fed to the PCOS machine during the elections. The authentication shall be through theuse of the PCOS machine actually used during the elections in the subject precinct, or

    by another device certified by the Commission as one that can perform the desired

    authentication requirement through the use of bar code and ultra-violet ray code

    detection mechanism.

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    62/106

    Conduct of Revision (cont )63

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    63/106

    Conduct of Revision (cont)

    In looking at the shades or marks used to registervotes, the recount committee shall bear in mind thatthe will of the voters reflected as votes in the ballotsshall as much as possible be given effect, setting

    aside any technicalities. Furthermore, the votesthereon are presumed to have been made by' thevoter and shall be considered as such unlessreasons exist that will justify their rejection. However,marks or shades which are less than 50% of the ovalshall not be considered as valid votes. Any issue as

    to whether a certain mark or shade is within thethreshold shall he determined by feeding the balloton the PCOS machine, and not by humandetermination.

    Conduct of Revision (cont )64

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    64/106

    Conduct of Revision (cont)

    The rules on appreciation of ballots under Section211 of the Omnibus Election Code shall applysuppletorily when appropriate.

    There shall be a tally sheet, of at least 5 copies, plusadditional copies depending on the number of

    additional parties, that will be used for the tallying ofthe votes as they are counted, through the use of thetara or sticks.

    After all the ballots from one ballot box have beencounted, the recount committee shall secure thecontested ballots and complete the recount report forsaid precinct. Thereafter, it shall proceed to recountthe votes on the ballots from the next precinct.

    Conduct of Revision (cont )65

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    65/106

    Conduct of Revision (cont)

    In case of multiple recount committees, the revisions

    shall be done simultaneously.

    In the event that the revision committeedetermines that the integrity of the ballots and theballot box were not preserved, as when there is proof

    of tampering or substitution, it shall proceed toinstruct the printing of the picture image of the ballotsof the subject precinct stored in the data storagedevice for the same precinct. The commission shallprovide a non-partisan technical person who shallconduct the necessary authentication process to

    ensure that the data or image stored is genuine andnot a substitute. It is only upon such determinationthat the printed picture image can be used for therecount.

    66

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    66/106

    Immediately after the revision of ballots or theexamination, verification or re-tabulation ofelection returns in all protested precincts the

    protestant shall be required to pinpoint a number ofprecincts, corresponding to twenty percent of thetotal revised protested precincts, that will best attestto the votes recovered or will best exemplify thefrauds or irregularities pleaded in the protest.

    In the meanwhile, the revision of ballots or theexamination, verification or re-tabulation of electionreturns in the counter-protested precinctsshall besuspended for a period not exceeding fifteen (15)days, during which the court shall determine through

    appreciation of ballots or election documents themerit or legitimacy of the protest relative to the twentypercent pinpointed precincts.

    Two Kinds of Revisors Report for67

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    67/106

    Two Kinds of Revisors Report for

    Submission1. Per Precinct Revision Report

    - to be signed and certified by the chairperson and partyrevisors and shall form part of the records of the case.

    2. Committee Report

    - summarizes the votes, ballot objections and claims, andsignificant observations made in the revision of ballots fromthe protested precincts and later from the counter-protestedprecincts.

    Each party furnished with a copy of the committee report

    may submit their comments thereon within a non-extendibleperiod of three (3) days from notice.

    68

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    68/106

    Based on the results of such post-revisiondetermination, the court with reasons cited, may

    1. dismiss the protest without further proceedings, if andwhen no reasonable recovery was established fromthe twenty percent (20%) pinpointed precincts.

    or

    2. In the event that there is reasonable recovery,

    proceed with revision of the ballots or the examination,verification or re-tabulation of election returns in thecounter-protested precincts. In the latter case, theprotestee shall be required to pay the cash depositwithin a non-extendible period of three days from

    notice.

    69

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    69/106

    3. While revision of ballots in counter-protested precincts is taking place, the

    court shall examine and appreciate theoriginal ballots of the protested precinctsaided by the revisorsper precinct report.

    4. After the ballots in counter-protestedprecincts have been revised, the courtshall also examine and appreciate theoriginal ballots of the counter-protested

    precincts aided by the revisors perprecinct report.

    70

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    70/106

    In the appreciation of the ballots, and in

    rendering rulings on objections and

    claims to ballots of the parties, the courtshall observe the following rules: (Rule 14,Sec. 2)

    On Marked Ballots The court must specify theentries in the ballots that clearly indicate that the

    intention of the voter is to identify the ballot. Thespecific markings in the ballots must be illustrated orindicated.

    On Fake or Spurious Ballots The court mustspecify the COMELEC security markings that are notfound in the ballots that are considered fake orspurious.

    On Stray Ballots The court must specify and statein detail why the ballots are considered stray.

    71

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    71/106

    On Pair or Group of Ballots Written by One or

    Individual Ballots Written By Two When ballots areinvalidated on the ground of written by one person,the court must clearly and distinctly specify why thepair or group of ballots has been written by only oneperson. The specific strokes, figures or lettersindicating that the ballots have been written by oneperson must be specified. A simple ruling that a pairor group of ballots has been written by one personwould not suffice. The same is true when ballots areexcluded on the ground of having been written by twopersons. The court must likewise take intoconsideration the entries of the Minutes of Voting andCounting relative to illiterate or disabled voters, if any,who cast their votes through assistors, in determiningthe validity of the ballots found to be written by oneperson, whether the ballots are in pairs or in groups;and

    On Claimed Ballots The court must specify theexact basis for admitting or crediting claimed votes toeither party.

    TECHNICAL EXAMINATION72

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    72/106

    TECHNICAL EXAMINATION

    Motion for Technical Examination

    Contents:

    Within five (5) days after completion of revision in the protest orcounter-protest, except when it involves allegation of massive

    substitute voting in the protest or counter-protest, a party maymove for technical examination, specifying:

    a. The nature of the technical examination requested (e.g.,fingerprint or handwriting examination, etc.)

    b. The documents to be subjected to technical examination

    c. The objections made in the course of the revision ofballots which the movant intends to substantiate with theresults of the technical examination, and

    d. The ballots covered by such objections.

    73

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    73/106

    IF MOTION FOR TECHNICAL EXAMINATION IS GRANTED

    It shall start within five (5) days from notice to both parties

    and shall be completed within the period specified by thecourt, in no case to exceed twenty (20)successiveworking days, unless the court grants anextension based on exceptionally meritorious ground.

    Place and time of examination shall be included in theNOTICE to counsel or to parties without counsel.

    A party may attend the technical examination, eitherpersonally or through a representative. However, thetechnical examination shall proceed with or without theattendance of the party, provided due notice has beengiven to the party.

    The expenses for technical examination shall be for theaccount of the party requesting the examination and underthe supervision of the clerk of court.

    74

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    74/106

    EXPERTS

    to Conduct Technical Examination

    Shall be provided by the requesting party;

    May come from the NBI, PNP Crime Lab,COMELEC, or experts in private practice.

    The other party may secure the services of an expertwho may only observe, not interfere with, theexamination conducted by the experts of the movant.

    PHOTOCOPYING OF BALLOTS75

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    75/106

    PHOTOCOPYING OF BALLOTS

    AND ELECTION DOCUMENTS (Rule12)Photocopying of Ballots and Election Documents

    Allowed BUT Simultaneous with Revision upon SuchTerms and Conditions the Court Imposes

    Where Conducted:

    Within the premises of the court, near the revisionarea with a photocopier supplied by movant.

    It shall be under the supervision of the clerk of court.

    Movant shall bear all expenses relative tophotocopying.

    PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE76

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    76/106

    PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

    (RULE 13)Presentation and Reception of Evidence; order of

    hearing

    If at the preliminary conference the parties have agreed on issuesaliunde the ballots or other election documents (e.g., vote-buying,

    fraud, terrorism or violence), the reception of evidence on theissues, including the testimonies of witnesses, shall be donesimultaneously with the revision of ballots.

    The reception of evidence on all other matters or issues incidentalto or interwoven with the ballots and related election documentsshall be made upon completion of

    (a) the revision of ballots or election documents, or(b) the technical examination,

    if allowed by the court under the provisions of Rule 11 of these Rules.

    77

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    77/106

    Order of Presentation of Evidence

    1.Protestants evidence

    2.Protesteesevidence

    3. Rebuttal Evidence

    4. No sur-rebuttal evidence allowed.

    When introducing electronic evidence:

    Section 1. Burden of pro ving authent ic i ty. -

    The person seeking to introduce an electronicdocument in an election protest has the burden ofproving its authenticity.

    Electronic Authenticating78

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    78/106

    Electronic Authenticating

    Document Section 2. Manner of authent icat ion. - Before any

    electronicdocument or data offered as authentic is received inevidence, its authenticity must be proved by any of thefollowing means:

    a) By evidence that it had been digitally signed by the personpurported to have signed the same;

    b) By evidence that other'appropriate security procedures ordevices for authentication of electronic documents wereapplied to'the document; or

    c) By other evidence showing its integrity and reliability to thesatisfaction of the judge.

    79

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    79/106

    Section 1. Original of an

    electronic document or data.

    Anelectronic document or data

    shall be regarded as the

    equivalent of an originaldocument under the Best

    Evidence Rule if it is a printout or

    output readable by site or othermeans, shown to reflect the data

    accurately.

    80

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    80/106

    Section 2. Copies as equivalent of the

    or iginals. - When a document is in two ormore copies executed at or about the sametime with identical contents, or is acounterpart produced by the sameimpression as the original, or from thesame matrix, or by mechanical or electronicre-recording, or by chemical reproduction,or by other equivalent techniques which isaccurately reproduces the original, such

    copies or duplicates shall be regarded asthe equivalent of the original.

    81

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    81/106

    Section 3. Aff idavit of evidence. - Allmatters relating to the admissibility andevidentiary weight of an electronicdocument may be established by anaffidavit stating facts of direct personalknowledge of the affiant or based onauthentic records. The affidavit mustaffirmatively show the competence of theaffiant to testify o n the matters containedtherein. The affiant shall be made to affirmthe contents of the affidavit in open session

    and may be cross-examined as a matter ofright by the adverse party.

    82

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    82/106

    Testimonial evidence shall be in affidavit form,

    in question and answer format, subject toadverse partys objections to inadmissible

    portions and to oral cross-examination.

    The affidavit shall be based on personalknowledge, shall set forth facts as would beadmissible in evidence, and shall showaffirmatively that the affiant is competent to

    testify on the matters stated therein. Theaffidavit shall be submitted to the court andserved on the adverse party at least three (3)days before the hearing.

    Failure to submit the affidavit of a witnesswithin the specified time shall constitute awaiver of the party's right to present testimonialevidence.

    One (1)-Day-Cross-Examination-

    83

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    83/106

    One (1)-Day-Cross-Examination-of-Witness Rule

    SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TObut, extension shall be subject tocourtsdiscretion.

    The revision reports, as well as theobjected and claimed ballots referredto therein, shall automatically form partof court records and may be adoptedby the parties as their evidence.

    84

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    84/106

    Offer of Evidence

    Shall be done orally on the last day of hearingof a partysevidence

    Adverse party shall immediately interposeobjections

    The court shall rule on the offer of evidencein open court. However, the court may, at itsdiscretion, allow the party to make an offerof evidence in writing, which shall be

    submitted within three (3) days. If the courtrejects any evidence offered, the party maymake a tender of the excluded evidence.

    R ti f E id

    85

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    85/106

    Reception of EvidenceSec. 3, Rule 13

    Once commenced, it shall continuefrom day to day as far as practicableuntil terminated.

    Presentation shall not exceed ten

    (10) successive days for each party,unless authorized by the SupremeCourt.

    Adj t d

    86

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    86/106

    Adjournments andPostponements

    No motion for postponement shall beallowed, except for clearly meritorious

    reasons, in no case to exceed threetimes of three calendar days intervaleach. The filing of dilatory pleadings ormotions shall constitute direct contemptof court and shall be punished

    accordingly.

    Disputable Presumptions87

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    87/106

    Disputable PresumptionsOn the elect ion procedu re:

    1. The election of candidates was held on the date and time setand in the polling place determined by the Commission onElections;

    2. The Boards of Election Inspectors were duly constituted and

    organized;

    3. Political parties and candidates were duly represented bypollwatchers;

    4. Pollwatchers were able to perform their functions; and

    5. The Minutes of Voting and Counting contains all the incidentsthat transpired before the Board of Election Inspectors.

    O l t i h l i

    88

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    88/106

    On elect ion paraphernal ia:

    1. Ballots and election returns that bear thesecurity markings and features prescribed bythe Commission on Elections are genuine;

    2. The data and information supplied by the

    members of the Boards of ElectionInspectors in the accountable forms are trueand correct; and

    3. The allocation, packing and distribution of

    election documents or paraphernalia wereproperly and timely done.

    S b i i f M d

    89

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    89/106

    Submission of Memoranda

    After the parties have rested their case, thecourt may allow the parties to submit theirrespective memoranda within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days from the

    verbal ruling of the court on the last offer ofexhibits; or, if the offer was made in writing,within ten (10) days from receipt of thewritten ruling of the court.

    No supplemental, reply or rebuttalmemorandum shall be allowed.

    DECISION(Rule 14)90

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    90/106

    DECISION(Rule 14)

    Rendition of Decision

    Within thirty (30) days from the date case issubmitted for decision, but in no case beyond six (6)months after its filing, unless SC authorizes anextension in writing.

    Failure to comply is a serious offense and shall beground for disciplinary action against the judge.

    In addition, after the expiration of six months, thejudge shall be relieved of all duties and functions,except to decide the election case.

    The winner shall be the candidate who obtained theplurality of the valid votes cast.

    91

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    91/106

    Several Judgments

    When a several judgment is proper,

    court may render judgment againstone or more of them, leaving the

    protest or petition to proceed against

    the others.

    Promulgation of Decision

    92

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    92/106

    Promulgation of Decision

    The decision signed by the judge shall bepromulgated by the reading of the dispositive portionin open court and its filing with the clerk of court, ona date set with due notice to the parties,

    or

    Through delivery of a copy of the signed decision tothe clerk of court who shall forthwith indicate the dateof rendition and cause true copies thereof to beserved, personally or by registered mail, upon thecounsel or the parties, if not represented by counsel.

    93

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    93/106

    Finality of Decision

    The decision of the court shallbecome final and executory five (5)

    days after filing with the clerk of

    court and receipt of notice by theparties.

    94

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    94/106

    Entry of Judgment

    If no appeal is filed within the time provided inthese Rules, the judgment shall be entered bythe clerk in the book of entries of judgments.

    The date of finality of the judgment shall be thedate of its entry.

    The record shall contain the dispositive part ofthe judgment and shall be signed by the clerk,

    with a certificate that such judgment hasbecome final and executory.

    95

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    95/106

    Notice of Final Decision

    As soon as the decision becomes final, the clerk of court shall send

    notices to the COMELEC, DILG,

    and COA.

    96

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    96/106

    APPEAL

    All appeals from first level courts andsecond level courts in election protest orquo warranto shall be made to COMELEC.

    Within five (5) days after promulgation in

    open court or within five (5) days fromreceipt of the decision.

    By filing a notice of appeal with the courtthat rendered the decision,

    With copy served on the adverse counselor party if not represented by counsel.

    97

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    97/106

    Appeal Fee

    The appellant in an election contest

    shall pay to the court that rendered

    the decision an appeal fee of One

    Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00),

    simultaneously with the filing of the

    notice of appeal.

    98

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    98/106

    Immediate Transmittal

    of Records of the Case

    The clerk of court shall, within fifteen daysfrom the filing of the notice of appeal,

    transmit to the Electoral ContestsAdjudication Department, COMELEC , thecomplete records of the case, together withall the evidence, including the original and

    three copies of the transcript ofstenographic notes of the proceedings.

    99

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    99/106

    Execution Pending Appeal

    On motion of the prevailing party withnotice to the adverse party, the court,while still in possession of the originalrecords, may, at its discretion, order theexecution of the decision in an electioncontest before the expiration of the

    period to appeal, subject to thefollowing rules:

    a. There must be a motion by the prevailing

    100

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    100/106

    a. There must be a motion by the prevailingparty with three(3) -day notice to theadverse party. Execution pending appealshall not issue without prior notice andhearing. There must be good reasons forthe execution pending appeal. The court, ina special order, must state the good orspecial reasons justifying the executionpending appeal. Such reasons must:

    1. constitute superior circumstancesdemanding urgency that will outweigh theinjury or damage should the losing partysecure a reversal of the judgment on appeal;and

    2. be manifest, in the decision sought to beexecuted, that the defeat of the protestee orthe victory of the protestant has been clearlyestablished.

    b If the court grants an execution

    101

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    101/106

    b. If the court grants an executionpending appeal, an aggrieved partyshall have twenty (20) working daysfrom notice of the special order withinwhich to secure a restraining order orstatus quo order from the SC or theCOMELEC.

    The corresponding writ of executionshall issue after twenty (20) days, if norestraining order or status quo order is

    issued. During such period, the writ ofexecution pending appeal shall bestayed.

    Jurisdiction of the COMELEC

    102

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    102/106

    Jurisdiction of the COMELEC

    in Certiorari Cases

    The Commission on Elections hasthe authority to issue the

    extraordinary writs of certiorari,prohibition and mandamus only inaid of its appellate jurisdiction overdecisions of the courts in electioncases involving elective municipaland barangay officials.

    103

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    103/106

    Preferential Disposition

    of Election Contests

    The courts shall give preferenceto election contests

    over all other cases,

    excepthabeas corpus.

    COSTS, DAMAGES AND104

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    104/106

    ATTORNEY'S FEES (RULE 15)Costs

    Allowed to the prevailing party as a matter of course.

    The court shall have the power, for special reasons, toapportion the costs, as may be equitable.

    The court may render judgment for costs if a protest, acounter-protest or a petition for quo warranto is dismissed.

    When a protest, a counter-protest or a petition for quo warrantois found to be frivolous, double or treble costs may be imposedon the protestant, the counter-protestant or the petitioner.

    Damages and Attorney's Fees

    In all election contests, the court may adjudicate damages andattorney's fees, as it may deem just and as established by theevidence, if the aggrieved party has included such claims inthe pleadings.

    FINAL PROVISIONS105

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    105/106

    (Rule 17)

    Repealing Clause

    All rules, resolutions, regulations or circulars of the SupremeCourt or parts thereof that are inconsistent with anyprovision of these Rules are hereby deemed repealed ormodified accordingly.

    Rules 35 and 36 of the 1993 COMELEC Rules of Proceduregoverning election contests and quo warranto cases beforethe trial courts are deemed superseded by these Rules.

    Effectivity Clause

    These Rules shall take effect on May 15, 2007 followingtheir publication in two newspapers of general circulation inthe Philippines not later than May 3, 2007.

    106

  • 8/13/2019 Session 3-Election Contests

    106/106

    Thank you!