Session 20 Daniel Furda, Bahareh Saffarian

20
Daniel Furda, Bahareh Saffarian Linköpings universitet Methods for work zone dynamic merge using traffic lights

Transcript of Session 20 Daniel Furda, Bahareh Saffarian

Daniel Furda, Bahareh Saffarian

Linköpings universitet

Methods for work zone dynamic merge using traffic lights

2

Definition

A segment influenced by works on, near or above it

3

Work zone classifications

• Duration of the work

• Type of the interaction between road and the work zone

• Work intensity

4

Work zone Layouts

• Advanced warning area

• Transition area

• Working(activity) area

• Termination area

Termination Area

Transition Area

Activity Area

Advanced Warning

Area

5

Work zone impacts

Work zone impacts

safety

mobility

Environ-mental

cost

6

Work zone traffic performance analysis

• Mobility analysis( V/C, LOS, travel time delay)

• Safety analysis

• Delay and cost analysis

7

significant influential factors

• Heavy vehicle percentage

• Number of open and close lanes

• Work intensity

• Position of closed lanes

• Weather conditions

• Lane width

• Ramp distance

• Temporary speed limit

• Work zone length

8

Dynamic Merge Systems

Early Merge

Late Merge

9

Experiment

• Microsimulation – Aimsun

• Late merge metering

• Control through traffic lights

10

Calibration of the model

• Driver reaction time = 0,5s

• Driver reaction time at stop = 0,7s 

• Driver reaction time at lights = 0,7s

11

Layout of the work zone

Traffic ligthsOccupancy detectors

20m 100m

12

Assigned flow

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Flow

(veh/h)

Simulation time (min)

15 30 45 60 75

13

Scenarios

• ALINEA metering system

• Fixed cycle times

• Continuous merge metering

14

ALINEA

Traffic ligthsOccupancy detectors

Controler

15

Alinea

Lane 1

Lane 2

4s 3s Variable

Time

16

Fixed cycle times

Cycle time (s)

Time

30 30

60 60

Lane 1

Lane 2

Lane 1

Lane 2

60

120

Lane 1

Lane 2

15 15

30

17

Continuous metering

Lane 1

Lane 2

1

Time

1

18

Fixed cycle times

5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 850

50

100

150

200

250

300

AlineaFixed 120Fixed 60Fixed 30ContinNo control

5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 950

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Simulation time (min)

Mean Queue Length (veh)

Simulation time (min)

Delay Time per Vehicle (s)

19

Conclusion

• Extensive sensitivity analisys

• Evaluate the effect of lane-changing restrictions

• Calibration and validation of the model

www.liu.se