SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.
-
Upload
valerie-moore -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
2
Transcript of SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.
![Page 1: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS
![Page 2: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Phase 2. Priority setting and validation
![Page 3: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Phase 2. Setting priorities
What: identify strategic areas where FAO should focus its support to the country - Priority Matrix
How: Situation Analysis – scope (background work; focus) Assessment of Comparative Advantages – new SF/RF Prioritization – focus – fewer number of priorities and
outcomes
Principles: AlignmentComplementarity/synergy
Strategic direction
Strategic component of CPF document
![Page 4: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PARALLEL WITH UNDAF: Country analysis for UNDAFWHAT’S NEW?
• COUNTRY ANALYSIS – The Common Country Assessment (CCA) is no longer mandatory (FAO supported this change) and the UNCT can choose among 3 options:
Contribute to government-led analysis Support targeted studies Full CCA
![Page 5: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CPF prioritization process
Key challenges
Strategic areas for FAO intervention
CPF Priority areas
Underlying cause/effects for
specific challengesCPF Outcomes &
outputs
Priority Matrix
Results Matrix
Situation analysis
Comparative Advantage assessm
ent & O
ption Analysis
PrioritiesStakeholders Capacity
![Page 6: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
… identification of CHALLENGES
(WHAT, HOW and WHO)
Key challenges
Strategic areas for FAO intervention
CPF Priority areas
Underlying cause/effects for
specific challengesCPF Outcomes &
outputs
![Page 7: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Main elements of Situation Analysis – key questions?
• National context – main social and economic development challenges and opportunities with implication for agriculture sector and livelihoods
• Situation and outlook for FS,A, RD – current situation, trends – issues, challenges, opportunities
• Policy environment - National sector priorities, policies, strategies and programmes addressing the challenges and opportunities
• National stakeholders and capacity needs at policy, organizational and individual level
• Data and monitoring mechanism to measure progress
! Consideration to UN principles
![Page 8: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Some more details
(handout)
![Page 9: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
National context – what, how and who ? WHAT: Macro trends and challenges
TIPS
Economy 1. Positioning of the country (low income, etc.), food deficit country, general trends of the economy (GDP, employment, budget situation, indebtness, exchange rates and trade).
2. Sectoral performance and trends (GDP, employment rates, agricultural trade, main trade partners, etc)
Demography Trends in population, urban/rural, by gender and age, migrations, etc.
Institutions and governance
Government stability, line agricultural ministries, structure of the agricultural sector (dual, smallholders vs large scale farms, representativity of farmers, land tenure, etc.), national capacities
TechnologyICT, R&D, level of absorption and potential
Risk assessment Sources and frequency of risks. Coping mechanisms. How well is the country equiped to address risks.
SWOT table
![Page 10: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Capacity Assessment – building blockSee: CPF tool 3. pg5
10
Dimensions Capacity areas
Policy enabling Environment
Policy and legal frameworks
Economic framework and national public sector budget...
International political commitments
Organizations(public, private,
CSO…)
Which ministries are involved? Technical capacity? Is institutional knowledge sufficient in Agriculture and rural development? Practical experience?
IndividualsSkills levels (what skills are found in ARD sector, opportunities for their better preparation, …)
![Page 11: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Policy context: what, how and who?WHAT: Policy context
TIPS
Development plans Identification of rel. nat. programing frameworks and plans (including UNDAF)
identification of rel. dev. objectives and priorities of countries;
Analyse consistency with challenges identify possible gaps; identify country priorities relevant to FAO mandated
areasPolicy decisions Review policy decisions (FAPDA),
analyse their overall consistency with the development objectives,
identify gapsInternational committments Including FAO
Mapping of country priorities
![Page 12: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Activity 1: Review of a country example
1. Review of a the situation analysis (pg. 4-8)2. Assess to what extent the elements are
addressed ?
See CPF guide for the main elements (Pg: 48)(other ref. materials: Handout on Situation analysis)
![Page 13: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Day 2 – Session 2: Comparative advantages
![Page 14: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How do we prioritize our challenges?
![Page 15: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Plenary discussion – RECAP on prioritization criteria
How to ensure strategic focus – i.e. prioritize at the country level ?
“If the government asked (DEMAND) FAO to work on 20 priorities, how would you prioritize?
![Page 16: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Preferably emerge from a dialogue with the national stakeholders Not imposed, yet some suggested for consideration
FAO actual comparative advantages
Alignment with
national strategies and other
frameworks
Resource mobilization
potential
1
23
4
1. La haute prioritè – key strategic areas
2. High priority, although low likelihood for RM
3. La priorite moderèe – not Gvt priority
4. La basse prioritè – no CA, no capacity
Enabling conditions and capacities for achieving the results Likelihood of sustainability Ability to produce the highest level of impact Contribution to the MDGs/IADGs
Prioritization process – Criteria
![Page 17: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
See CPF Guide Pg. 33
![Page 18: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CPF priority matrix – reflects the key prioritization criteria
CPF priorities Relevant national priorities
FAO Regiona/Subregional priorities
Relevant UNDAF priorities
Other nationa/regional frameworks
CPF priority 1…
![Page 19: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Zooming into the comparative advantages
![Page 20: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Comparative Advantages
Mandate to act
Global Goals
Strategic Objectives and ORs
Core functions
KEY QUESTIONS? Does it contribute FAO global goals?Does it fall under the areas that the members want FAO to focus on
SO and ORs that FAO committed to achieve?Does it require application of FAOs core functions which are
recognized FAO comparative advantages?
![Page 21: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Core functions
• Monitoring and assessment of long-term and medium term perspectives
• Development of international instruments, norms and standards
• Policy, strategy options and advice• Technical support to promote technology transfer and
capacity building• Advocacy and communication• Interdisciplinarity and innovation• Partnership and alliances• Information and knowledge management
![Page 22: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Phase 2 – Setting priorities Comparative advantages
Actual comparative advantages
Mandate to act
Capacity to deliver
Global goals
Strategic objectives and
ORs
Core Functions
Resources
Influence
Partnership
![Page 23: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Comparative advantages
Actual CA at
country level
Mandate to act
Capacity to
act
Positio
n to
act
FAO Global GoalsFAO
Strategic Objectives/O
RsCore Functions
Resources
Influence
Partnerships
Revealed CA
Perceived CA
Gaps
Tip: Use this methodology and results to
discuss comparative advantages with UNCT
in UNDAF process
![Page 24: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Assessing FAO positioning in the country – Portfolio review
To assess FAO positioning in the country, identify areas of performance and draw forward looking lessons on how to improve FAO delivery in country.
![Page 25: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Main elements FAO Portfolio analysis : analysis of the information on the
status and evolution/ trend of FAO portfolio. ( number of projects, amount of budget, delivery, breakdown by source of funds, by resources partners). (from FPMIS) Analysis of the FAO performance in terms of status of
implementation and achievements of expected key results of the completed and on-going projects, lessons learned. (from progress reports, evaluation reports).
Comparison vs other partners involved in the same areas of intervention of FAO : size and type and performance of FAO intervention vs other partners ) (from ADAM – resource partners matrix, profiles, government reports, partners reports, other) –
Partners feed back on FAO country performance (surveys, external country assessment)
![Page 26: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
FPMIS Charts Ethiopia Historical
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
Delivery of Emergency and Non- Emergency projects in US Dollars
Technical Cooperation Emergencies
![Page 27: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
FPMIS Charts
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
-2,000,000
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
Delivery by Funding Source in US Dolllars
SPFS TCP TF Others TF/UTF UNDP
![Page 28: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
FPMIS Delivery by Sector2007-2011
-100,000
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000
[211] Natural Resources
[213] Livestock
[221] Nutrition
[223] Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks
[256] Food Production in Support of Food Security in LIFDCs
[2C ] Diseases and pests of animals and plants
[2K ] Sustainable natural resources management
[4C ] Food security, poverty reduction and other development cooperationprogrammes
![Page 29: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Back to Priority matrix and validation process
![Page 30: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CPF priority matrix – template CPF priorities Relevant
national priorities
FAO Regiona/Subregional priorities
Relevant UNDAF priorities
Other nationa/regional frameworks
CPF priority 1…
![Page 31: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Examples provided on the reference desk
![Page 32: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Day 2 - Session 2b: Causes and effects analysis
![Page 33: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CAUSES
EFFECTS
Problem Focal
Developing a problem tree
Turning the problem into a positive
statement can give the outcome or impact
Addressing the causes can identify possible
outputs and activities
Addressing the effects identifies possible
indicators
But why?
So what
![Page 34: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Challenge: High prevalence of food insecurity
Poor capacity of extensionWorkers
Policy and legal framework Budgetary allocations
Poor agricultural production
and productivity
Skills level of extension staff
Dependency on rain fed cultivation
Inefficient irrigation system
Policy enabling environment
Organizations
Individuals
Operational capacity of ext. units
Situation analysisKEY MESSAGES
BUT Why
?
Food availability
![Page 35: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Assessing the coherance between needs and CPF results
![Page 36: SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/5697bfe81a28abf838cb6110/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Group Activity 6. Application of the problem and objective tree and options analysis
• Task: Assess coherence between the identified problems in the situation analysis and the presented outcomes/outputs in the CPF results matrix and provide evidence of your assessment.
→ Key message: Assure coherence between the situation analysis and the identified CPF results