Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries
description
Transcript of Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries
(ARL) member libraries
Damon Jaggars & Shanna SmithUniversity of Texas at Austin
Jocelyn DuffyPortland State University
7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services
Stellenbosch, South Africa
August 14, 2007
LibQUAL+ instrument
- 22 items (1-9 Likert scale)
- Minimum, Perceived, Desired
- Dimensions of Service Quality: Affect of Service (AS), Information Control (IC), Library as Place (LP)
Information Control Undergraduate Graduate Faculty StaffEasy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3 5 5 8Making information easily accessible for independent use 6 6 6 13Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office 1 3 2 22A library website enabling me to locate information on my own 7.5 4 4 6Modern equipment that lets me easily access the information I need 2 7 10 15** Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 12.5 1.5 1 10.5** The printed library materials I need for my work 16 10 8.5 14* The electronic information resources I need 12.5 1.5 3 12
Affect of ServiceReadiness to respond to users' questions 15 12 13 5Employees who understand the needs of their users 19 14 11.5 7Employees who deal with users in a caring fashion 18 17 15 10.5Employees who instill confidence in users 21 20 16 9Employees who have the knowledge to answer user questions 10 9 8.5 3Willingness to help users 17 11 14 2Giving users individual attention 22 22 17 17Dependability in handling users' service problems 4.5 8 11.5 4Employees who are consistently courteous 14 13 7 1
Library as Place** A getaway for study, learning, or research 4.5 15 19 18** Library space that inspires study and learning 11 19 20 19** Quiet space for individual activities 7.5 18 21 16A comfortable and inviting location 9 16 18 20* Community space for group learning and group study 18 21 22 21
Desired Mean Ranking 2005
Calculating Priority Index• Define service priorities for individual respondents by re-scaling desired
scores
• Illustration: – Betty, a member of the library staff– Very high expectations; average desired score across all 22 items
is 8.8. – Some items more important than others to her
• Desired score for “comfortable and inviting location” is 7• Desired score for “employees who deal with users in a caring
fashion” is 9– Re-scale Betty’s scores around her individual mean of 8.8 to
calculate priority scores– New scores: -1.8 for inviting location (below-average); +0.2 for
caring for users (above-average)
Results for UT Austin Analysis
• Library staff set a lower service priority than users on several IC items
• Library staff set a higher service priority than users on several AS items
• Library staff prioritize higher than faculty, lower than undergraduates, and similarly to graduate students on LP items
• Are our local results generalizable across the larger library community, specifically the ARL cohort?
ARL Cohort Study Sample
• ARL cohort for 2006 LibQUAL+ survey administration
• 45 ARL libraries
• 28,851 useable surveys submitted: – 10,856 from undergraduates– 11,157 from graduate students– 6,214 from faculty– 624 from library staff
Average Faculty & Library Staff Priority Scores for 7 Selected ARL Libraries
Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office (IC1)
Information Control: ARL Cohort
E-resources from home/office
Website/information on own
Printed materials
E-resources I need
Modern equipment
Easy-to-use access tools
Making information accessible
Print or e-journals
Affect of Service: ARL Cohort
Instill confidence
Individual attention
Courteous
Ready response
Knowledge
Caring
Understand needs
Willing to help
Dependable
Library as Place: ARL Cohort
Inspire study & learning
Quiet space/individual
Comforting/inviting
A getaway
Group learning/study
Results from ARL Cohort Study
• Misalignments in service priorities found in the local analysis confirmed and expanded in the ARL cohort analysis
• Library staff set a lower service priority for most IC items
• Library staff set a higher service priority for all AS items (except AS #9 – Dependability of service)
• Library staff prioritize higher than faculty, lower than undergraduates, and similarly to graduate students on LP items
Conclusions
• ARL Cohort library staff, in general, have not yet internalized the extent to which many users prioritize unmediated access to easy-to-use, quality content and services and de-emphasize traditional mediated service.
• Disparate, and sometimes conflicting, service priorities of our core user groups, especially faculty and undergraduates is a complicating factor.
• A challenge for library leadership to work with staff to better align organizational service priorities with evolving user needs and demonstrated behaviors.
Possible Limitations
• Assumption: Users’ desired scores on the LibQUAL+ survey can be used to indicate the relative importance of a survey item
• Relatively small sample size of library staff
• Point of view staff take when responding to the survey
Future Research
• Are the service priorities of staff and users diverging over time?
• Is it useful to compare the service priorities of an individual library’s staff against the cohort (or a chosen cohort)?
Local - ARL Cohort Comparison
F = Faculty
G = Graduate students
U = Undergraduates
“+” = Library staff set higher service priority
“-” = Library staff set lower service priority
Red = marginally higher or lower prioritization
Item UT Austin ARL Cohort
AS-1 Employees who instill confidence in users F+G+U+ F+G+U+AS-2 Giving users individual attention G+U+ F+G+U+AS-3 Employees who are consistently courteous U+ F+G+U+AS-4 Readiness to respond to users' questions F+G+U+AS-5 Employees who have the knowledge to answer user questions F+G+U+AS-6 Employees who deal with users in a caring fashion F+G+U+AS-7 Employees who understand the needs of their users F+G+U+AS-8 Willingness to help users F+G+U+AS-9 Dependability in handling users' service problems F-IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office F-G-U- F-G-U-IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own F-G- F-G-U-IC-3 The printed library materials I need for my work U+ F-G-U-IC-4 The electronic information resources I need F-G- F-G-U-IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information F-G-U-IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own F-G- F-G-U-IC-7 Making information easily accessible for independent use F-G- F-G-U-IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work F-G- F-G-LP-1 Library space that inspires study and learning F+U- F+U-LP-2 Quiet space for individual activities F+U- F+G-U-LP-3 A comfortable and inviting location U- F+U-LP-4 A getaway for study, learning, or research F+ F+G-U-LP-5 Community space for group learning and group study F+G+ F+U-
Contact Information
Damon JaggarsUniversity of Texas [email protected](512) 495-4321
Shanna SmithDivision of Statistics and Scientific ComputationUniversity of Texas at [email protected](512) 475-9425
Jocelyn DuffyPortland State University [email protected](503) 725-4126