Series Papers

12
HIV-Related Disparities Among Black MSM and Associations with Structural Factors Gregorio Millett Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Washington, DC

description

HIV-Related Disparities Among Black MSM and Associations with Structural Factors Gregorio Millett Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Washington, DC July 24, 2012. Series Papers. Meta-Analysis 1. Meta-Analysis 2. Purpose: Estimate HIV prevalence black MSM vs. general populations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Series Papers

Page 1: Series Papers

HIV-Related Disparities AmongBlack MSM and Associations with

Structural Factors

Gregorio MillettCenters for Disease Control and Prevention

Washington, DCJuly 24, 2012

Page 2: Series Papers

Series PapersMeta-Analysis 1

• Purpose:1. Explain HIV-related racial disparities

among US MSM• HIV-positive MSM • young MSM

2. Are there similar racial disparities among MSM in Canada, UK and US?

• Sample: – 106,148 black MSM and 581577 MSM of other

races/ethnicities– 174 US studies, 13 UK studies and 7 US studies

Meta-Analysis 2

• Purpose:1. Estimate HIV prevalence

• black MSM vs. general populations• black populations across the world

2. Assess HIV prevalence among black MSM by African and Caribbean countries that criminalize homosexual behavior

• Sample – 129,976 black MSM in North America,

Caribbean, Europe and Africa

Page 3: Series Papers

HIV Prevalence Among Black MSM vs. General Black Populations Across Diaspora

HIV prevalence disparities among black MSM vs. general populations

• U.S. 72x more likely to be HIV+

• Canada 73X more likely to be HIV+

• UK111X more likely to be HIV+

Page 4: Series Papers

HIV Risk Behavior & HIV InfectionBlack vs. Other MSM, U.S. & U.K.

Page 5: Series Papers

Structural-Level Experiences &Resiliency, U.S. Black MSM vs. Other MSM

0tan28a566028

0tan29a566029

0tan1a56601

0tan2a56602

0tan3a56603

0tan4a56604

HIV

Prev

alen

ce S

umm

ary

Odd

Rati

o

Page 6: Series Papers

HIV-Related Summary ORs by Rank– Black MSM vs. Other MSM

Partner characteristicsStructural inequalitiesHIV clinical outcomes

Sexual risk behaviorsDrug useNongay identityCircumcision

Page 7: Series Papers

Diagnosed HIV+OR, 3.00 (2.06-4.40)

Undiagnosed HIVOR, 6.38 (4.33-9.39)

>200 CD4 cells/mm3 before

ART initiation OR, 0.40 (0.26-0.62)

ART adherenceOR, 0.50 (0.33-0.76)

HIV suppressionOR, 0.51 (0.31-0.83)

ART utilization/ accessOR, 0.56 (0.41-0.76)

HIV Detection

Viral Suppression

(Millett, 2012)

Disparities persist between black and other MSM throughout treatment cascade

Page 8: Series Papers

Diagnosed HIV+OR, 3.00 (2.06-4.40)

Undiagnosed HIVOR, 6.38 (4.33-9.39)

Health insurancecoverage

OR,0.47 (0.29-0.77)

>200 CD4 cells/mm3 before

ART initiation OR, 0.40 (0.26-0.62)

ART adherenceOR, 0.50 (0.33-0.76)

HIV suppressionOR, 0.51 (0.31-0.83)

ART utilization/ accessOR, 0.56 (0.41-0.76)

HIV Detection

Viral Suppression

Healthcare visits

OR, 0.61 (0.42-0.90)

Lower income (<$20k)

OR, 3.42 (1.94-6.01)

(Millett, 2012)

Page 9: Series Papers

Criminalization of Homosexuality & HIV Prevalence Disparities by Region

Page 10: Series Papers

Overall sample• No difference in

– Serodiscordant sex– Perceived susceptibility/ tx optimism– Sex network variables (eg, concurrency,

same-race partners)

• Greater risk of serconversion even if engage in serosorting/strategic positioning

• Less– Sex during drug use– Poppers– Amphetamines– Any drugs associated with HIV

infection

Young Black vs. Other Young MSM• Less likely to engage in

– Any substance use– Amphetamine use– Injection drug use – Crack cocaine use– Sex during drug use

• Yet, more likely to have HIV (5x), STI (7x), undiagnosed HIV (45% greater likelihood)

• HIV-related factors for young black MSM– Young sex debut (65% greater)– Childhood sexual abuse (82% greater)– Older sex partners (52% greater)

Other Noteworthy Findings

Page 11: Series Papers

• Black MSM – 8.5x more likely to be HIV+ vs. black populations

worldwide– 15x more likely to be HIV+ vs. general

populations

• Risk behavior does not explain HIV disparities in UK or US black MSM, and late ART access for black MSM in both countries

• Disparities greatest for structural, clinical, network variables associated with HIV infection

– Future interventions must focus here

• Black MSM 40% more likely to engage in any protective behavior, despite greater exposure to any structural barrier

• Criminalization of homosexual activity is associated with a 2-fold increase in HIV prevalence among black MSM across African and Caribbean countries— Association only statistically significant for

Caribbean countries

• Both reviews establish • Similar patterns in greater risk for HIUV

infection among black MSM across countries

• Addressing structural barriers is essential to eliminating disparities and achieving health equity for black MSM at higher risk for HIV infection worldwide and should be targeted for HIV prevention and care efforts

Summary

Page 12: Series Papers

• John Peterson, USA• Stephen Flores, USA• William Jeffries, USA• Charles Heilig, USA• Trevor Hart, Canada• Tim Lane, USA• Robert Remis, Canada

• David Malebranche, USA• Sean Rourke, Canada• Patrick Wilson, USA• Jonathan Elford, UK• Kevin Fenton, USA• Riley Steiner, USA

Acknowledgments