SEPARATOR - sra.netcreativemind.co.insra.netcreativemind.co.in/upload/whatsnew/Constitution.pdf ·...

SEPARATOR

\

SLUM REHABILATION AUTHORITYNo.: SRA/ENG/317/GS/ML/LOI

Sub:- Revised LOI for S.R. Scheme on plot bearing part C.S, no. 47 and 16/47 of Lower Parel Division, situated at Dr. A.B. Road, Mumbai in G/S Ward for

"Mariamma Nagar SRA CHS Ltd”

ArchitectDeveloperSociety

Shri Pravin Naik of M/s. Pravin Naik & Associates

M/s. Akshay Sthapathya Pvt. Ltd.“Mariamma SRA CHS Ltd”

Reference is requested to the application in the SOP format as at page 01 to 05

by the Architect Shri Pravin Naik of M/s. Pravin Naik 8& Associates wherein he has

requested to issue revised LOI andgrant relaxation/concessions for S.R. Scheme with

respect to planning of proposed building 8& layout as per Regulation 33(10) of DCR

1991.

The gist of the case is as follow:

In this case the proposal for S. R. Scheme under Regulation 33 (10) was submitted to this office on 06.02.1999.

The Plot bearing Part of C.S. No. 47 and 16/47 of Lower Parel Division are belongs

to the MCGM and the Annexure II is issued by the Ward Officer (G/South) under No. WOGS/328/SR/Colony on 30.12.1998.

As per the Annexure - II issued by the Competent Authority 1031 Nos. of the

tenants out of 1238 Nos. of the tenants, are held eligible for the scheme.

Considering the Annexure - II and other aspects, the S. R. Scheme was sanctioned

by then Hon’ble CEO (SRA) on 29.12.1999 and the LOI for the Scheme was issued to the Architect/Developer/Society on 04.01.2000, which was subsequently/lastly Revised on 06.12.2004.

The S. R. Scheme on above plots were sanctioned in accordance as per then provisions of the Appendix - IV, Regulation 33(10) of DCR 1991. However the FSI for the scheme is considered as 1.33 + 25% Additional FSI as per Govt. Notification issued on 19.04.2006, being the proposed S. R. Scheme is situated in CRZ - II. The copy of the report approved by then CEO (SRA).

The Architect has obtained the following approvals in the Scheme:

l ch S.E. ( S . R A ) A . E ^ R . / ) C/ . s: ;2tson Authority Slum R«hJbiiiUtion Authoiib^

Sr.no

Bldg. No. lOA CC granted Remarks/status on site

1 Rehab Building no. 1

14/05/2002 Gr.+ 1st to 5 h upper floor

22/02/2006 up to plinth level.

Work is completed and occupied The same was convertti into transit camp for ' 152 nos. o f . tenements.

Amended lOA on 17/06/2010 (Gr. + 7* upper floor).

further C.C for full height granted on 02/04/2014.

2. Rehab Building no. 2

31-05-2010 Gr + l®t to 13* * upper floor

Plinth C.C. not granted


31-05-2010 Gr + l t to 13 * upper floor'


1


31-05-2010 Gr + to 13 upper floor


Rehab Building no. 5

31-05-2010 Gr + l t to 13^ upper floor


6

L_ .

Sale Building no. 1

17-05-2010 Wing “A” Gr.+ 17^ upper floor and Wing “B” Gr. + 3‘‘‘ floor.


Architect has submitted the proposal for converting the approved and constructed Rehab Building No. 1 to be declared as Transit Camp for the Scheme, as Developer of the Scheme has proposed to convert the S. R. Scheme under reference in

light of the Modification issued by the Govt, in UDD under No. TPB/4312/CR - 3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012 for the Clause No. 1.1, 1.2, 3.7 & 3.8 of Appendix - IV, of Regulation 33 (10) of DCR 1991 and as per the notification

published on 19.05.2015 under No. TPB-4315/CR-22/2015/UD-11 for the conversion of the scheme. Architect has requested to approve the same and issue the revised LOI

as per the Modification issued on 28.06.2012 and 19.05.2015.

As per the Notification issued by Govt, in UDD under No. TPB-4315/CR- 22/2015/UD-ll dated 19.05.2015, the Conversion of the Old S. R. Scheme inic modified S. R. Schemes as per the Modification issued by the Govt, in UDD under No. TPB/4312/CR - 3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012, can be allowed "If the full OCC has not been granted and if it is structurally feasible, to provided Rehabilitation Tenements having individual carpet area of 25.00 Sq.Mts without having completely pull down and reconstruct the, ongoing Rehabilitation Building, the Owner/Developer/Co. Op. Society/NGO/Public Authority executing such scheme may at its option and subject to ascertaining and due verification of scheme by CEO (SRA)

convert such scheme in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 33 (10) as

modified vide notification under No. TPB/4312/CR - 3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012.”

It is also to mention that, on 22.06.2015 this office has forwarded the suggestions for the said Notification wherein it is suggested to change the Notification as follows:

I f building is phusicallv not occupied fully or partly and/or i f part o f full OCC has

not been granted and if it is structurally feasible, to provided Rehabilitation

Tenements having individual carpet area of 25.00 Sq.Mts without having completely

pull down and reconstruct the ongoing Rehabilitation Building, the Owner/

Developer/ Co. Op. Society/ NGO/ Public Authority with the consent o f the

Developer/NGO/Public Authoritu executing such scheme may at its option and subject

to ascertaining and due verification of scheme by CEO (SRA), convert such scheme in

accordance with the provisions of Regulation 33 (10) as modified vide notification

under No. TPB/4312/CR - 3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012.”

In the present case, the Approvals to the Rehab Building No. 1 to 5 Was granted

by this office as mentioned above. However only Building No. 1 is completed on site

but OCC was not granted to the said building. The CEO (SRA) on 25-07-2015, has

also accorded the sanction for allowing the Constructed Rehab Building No. 1 to be

converted into Temporary Transit Camp as at Pg. 137 to 143. As such the building is

not fully/partly occupied on site and totally the fresh Planning for the rehab Tenants

considering the individual Carpet area as 25.00 Sq.Mts is proposed by the Architect,

the S. R. Scheme under reference can be converted into Modified Regulations/Clauses

for development of the Slum Scheme issued on 28.06.2012, subject to insisting the

consent letter from the Developer regarding to conversion of the Scheme as per

Modified Regulations, before issue of the Revised LOI.

In view of above, HonTDle CEO (SRA)'s orders are requested to allow converting

the ongoing S. R. Scheme from Rehab unit of carpet area having 20.90sq.mt to 25.00

sq.mt in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 33 (10) as modified vide

notification under No. TPB/4312/CR - 3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012, as

per the notification published on 19.05.2015 under No. TPB-4315/CR-22/2015/UD-

11.

Eng ineer Dy. Ch. ^ g ih ee rS .E ( S .R A ) A .E ' ' r ' Au thority Stum Rehabilitation Authority

Being the LOI for the Scheme is proposed to be revised as per the Modification

issued on 28.06.2012 & 19.02.2015 and considering the request of the Architect the

detailed report for approval of the various concessions and Revised LOI/Scheme

parameters is put up here with as follows:

The aspects regarding the Ownership of the Plot, Tenement Density/PAP

Tenements for the Scheme, Amenity Tenement for the Scheme, Access to the Plot,

Reservation affecting the Schemes, Nalla remarks, Provision of Physical R.G., etc. were

already considered in the last approved LOI report.

1. SALIENT FEATURES OF THE SCHEME:[Sr.No.

1DescriptionName of Slum Society___________CS No.

D. P. RemarksZoneDesignation/Reservations

RemarksMariamma Nagar Co-Op Hsg. Society Ltd.

Part of C.S. No. 47 and 16/47 of Lower Parel Division, situated at Dr. A. B. Road, Mumbai in G/South Ward___________SRDP 1991Residential Zone (R)

Access

Plot is affected by 18.00 Mts wide D. P. Road and is entirely shown Designated as Nehru Science Center (Museum). The plot under reference is abutting to existing Recreational Ground (Mahalaxmi Race Course) and existing Municipal Drain. The plot is falling in CRZ - ll.

DDP 2034Residential ZonePlot is affected by 18.&0Mts. wide D. P. Roadand

a) Reserved for RR2.1(i.e. Rehab &Resettlement).

b) RMS4.1 Sewerage Treatment plant

c) RMS 3.1 Solid Waste Management

d) RMS4.1 Sewagetreatment plant

e) RPU3.2 PoliceChowky.

The plot under reference is accessible from 18.00 mt. wide D. P. Road from the Bridge constructed by ! the Developer of subject scheme over the nalla. The '18.00 mtr. D.P. Road is connected to Dr. Annie Besant Road. Accordingly the access for the Scheme j is available.

5 D. P. Remarks 1991 Is at page 17 to 196 D.P. Remarks 2034 Is at paged 7 to 697 A. E. (Survey) Remarks Is at page 21 to 238 P. R. Cards Is at page 07 to 11.

9 Ownership MCGM land Leased out to Nehru Center

10 Area of the Plot for S. R. Scheme 20500.00 Sq.Mts11 Total Nos of Existing Slum Dwellers 1*648-Ne6r .

12 Eligible Slum Dwellers 1031 Nos/^Resi = 1026 Nos. R/C = 4nos.^ / Commercial = 01 No

13 Consent as per Annexure - II As mentioned by the WO G/S the 83% slum Dwellers have granted the Consent for Development of the Scheme.

2. D. P. REMARKS fSRDP 1991 fis DPP 20341:2.1 P.P. Remarks as per SRDP 1991:

As per the D. P. Remarks at Pg. 17 to 19, the plots under reference are affected18.00 Mts. wide D. P. Road and is entirely shown Designated as Nehru Science Center (Museum). The plot under reference is abutting to existing Recreational Ground (Mahalaxmi Race Course) and existing Municipal Drain. The plot is falling in CRZ - II.

2.2 Draft P. P. 2034:MCGM vide notification under no. CHE/32596/DP/GEN dated 25.02.2015 has

published the Draft D. P. 2034 for Greater Mumbai for inviting suggestions and

objections. Architect has submitted the Draft D. P. 2034 as at Pg. 67 to 69 for the

Scheme under reference. As per the Draft D. P. 2034, Plot is affected by 18,00 Mts.

wide D. P. Road and a) Reserved for RR2.1 (i.e. Rehab & Resettlement) b) RMS4.1

Sewerage Treatment plant, c) RMS 3.1 Solid Waste Management d)RMS4.1 Sewage

treatment plant& e) RPU3.2 Police Chowky.

It is to mention that, the guidelines are finalized vide CHE (DP)’s circulars issued on 10.03.2015 and 06.04.2015, to process the development in the transitional period of Draft D. P. 2034.

This office has also suggested the Chief Engineer (DP) and Principle Secretary

U.D. that SRA being Planning Authority should be excluded & the LOI should be

granted protection exclusion from Draft D. P. 2034, if issued prior to 25.02.2015.

The Architect has taken the cognizance of the stringent reservations from D.P. 1991

(W ^ ry jJ i, S.E.(S.RA|A.E'»'

jkvg Engineer Dy. cfi.'Engll^eer:4:;iztion Authority siuroR«h«*)ttitationA«rtkortty

and Draft D.P. 2034, as stated above and proposed to consider the provision of D.P,

1991 for planning as per the transitional provision of DCR 2034 65 MCGM circular

dated 06/04/2015.

In this case the LOI for the Scheme is issued on 04-01-2000 and lastly revised

LOI was issued on 06-12-2004 and the lOA to the Rehab Building No. 1 was issued on

15.05.2002, which is subsequently declared as Transit Camp. Hence the provisions of

Circular 10.03.2015 & 06.04.2015 are not applicable to the case under reference.

3. Applicability of FSI & DCR in S.R. Scheme in CRZ-IIThe MOEF (Govt, of India) vide its notification u/no. S.O. 114(E) dated 19 ^ Feb.

1991 had regulated the development of plots located in CRZ-II area and as per the

provision of said notification, the development or redevelopment was allowed to be| continued to be undertaken in accordance with the norms laid down in the Town and

Country Planning Regulations as they existed on the date of issue of the notification dated 19^ Feb 1991. The SRDP 1991, was implement from 20.02.1991 and DCR 1967

was applicable on the date of issue of,MOEF Notification regarding development m

CRZ area. As such as per the said MOEF Notification DCR 1967 was appUcable for

Development of plots located in CRZ area of Mumbai city. There were no regulations

for implementation of S.R. Scheme under DCR 1967. The Reg. governing

implementation of Slum Rehabilitation scheme were made applicable vide notification DCR/1095/1209/CR-273/1995/UD-11 dated 15-10-1997.

In the past SRA had approved Nine numbers of scheme as per Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991 wherein in situ FSI 2.50 has been granted. Consequent to the clarification of the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Govt, of India, vir Letter No. J 1701/3/95- ( LA III dated 08.09.1998 regarding entitlement of FSI in areas under CRZ notification

of 19-02-1991, restriction were imposed on use of FSI upto 2.50 FSI as prevalent on the date of CRZ Notification i.e. 19.02.1991 was permitted in respect of new Slum

Rehabilitation Scheme under Reg.33(10j. Subsequently as per the clarification issued by U.D. Dept. Govt, of Maharashtra u/no. TPB/4306/456/UD-ll dated 19.04.2006, SRA has approved S.R. Schemes by restricting the in situ FSI to 1.66 in Mumbai City and 1.25 in Mumbai suburb. All other aspects of Development pertaining to implementation of S.R. Scheme were considered and approved as per the various Provisions/Clauses of Appendix-IV under Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991.

Subsequently the Notification dtd. 19.02.1991 was superseded by MOEF notification U/ no. S.0.19(E) dated 6**" Jan, 2011 and a separate regulation was introduced for Regulation of Development inCRZ-II areas of Mumbai city. As per Clause no. 8(i)(II)(ii) of MOEF Notification dtd. 16.01.2011 (S.O. 19(E)), read with Corrigendum dated 29.03.2011 to the buiildings permitted on the landward side of the existing and proposed roads or existing authorized structures shall be subject to the existing local town and counrty planning regulations including the "existing” norms of Floor Space Index or Floor Space Index or Floor Area Ratio; Provided that no permission for construction of building shall be given on landward side of any new roads which are constructed on the seaward side of an existing road.

Reference is requested to letter U/no. 19-64/2000 -IA.III(Vol. 11) dtd.01.05.2015 issued by Joint Secretary, MOEF (Govt, of India) to M/s. Topworth Properties Pvt. Ltd with regards to the S.R. Scheme on C.S. 4/47(pt), 47(pt), 46 and 13/47 of Lower Parel Division wherein it is clarified that asper opinion of Attorney General for India, Slum Rehabilitation Scheme were not existing on 19.02.1991 and Regulation governing Slum Rehabilitation project being Reg. 33(10) came into existence on 15.10.1997. Accordingly, clarification contained in Joint Secretary, MOEF (Govt, of Indiaj's letter no. J-17011/3/95-LA-III dated 08.091998 to the notification dated 19.02.1991 will not apply to the project for Slum Rehabilitation under Reg. 33(10). It is further clarified that provisions of Reg.33(10) in terms of Norms and Regulations including FSl/FAR as notified for the first time in 1997 shall apply for S.R. Scheme in Mumbai in CRZ-II area.

Reference is further requested to Notification u/no. S01599(E) dtd.16.06.2016 published by MOEF (Govt, of India), wherein the MOEF (Govt. Of India) has now amended the provisions of CRZ notification 2011. The modified clause 8(i)(II)(ii) of said notification states that "Building permitted on land ward side of the existing and proposed roads or existing authorized structures shall be subject to the existing local town planning and country planning Regulations as modified from time to time except the Floor Space Index of floor area ratio which shall be as per 1991 level”.

Thus as per the said Clause all the Town Planning and Country Planning Norms and Regulations as modified from time to time become applicable to S.R. Scheme which are located on the land ward side of the existing and praposed roads except for FSI which shall be as per 1991 level. The Slum Rehabilitation Schemes are Governed by Provisions of Reg. 33(10) amended from time to time. The In-situ FSI as per 1991 level is restricted to 1.66 in Mumbai City and 1.25 in Mumbai Suburbs.

Therefore it is inferred that,

/ ! / j (Ixecj^itve Eng ineer Dy. Ch. Engm terS.E. (S.R.A.)A.E.(?.P...’ ) C' iiei: '^bilitation Authority Slum Rehabilitation Authority

a) All the norms and regulations pertaining to the implementation of S.R. Scheme will be governed by provision of Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991 as modified from time to time.

b) The in situ FSI will be restricted to 1991 level i.e. as per DCR 1967 wherein in situ FSI of 1.66 in Mumbai City and 1.25 in MumbaiSuburbs is permissible as per clarification issued by U.D. Dept. Govt, of Maharashtra uner no. TPB- 4306/456/UD-ll dated 19.04.2006.As such the approval granted by SRA in the Past, by appljdng various provisions

of Reg. 33(10) in terms of Norms and Regulation, are in line with the clarification issued vide above mentioned letter. It should be noted here that though the S.R. Schemes are approved as per the various provisions of Reg. 33(10), the in-situ FSI is restricted to 1.66 in Mumbai City. i.e. the FSI as per 1991 level (DCR 1967).

In view of above, Hon CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested for considering applicability of DCR as mentioned below: |

‘B’ ] 1. All the Norms and regulation pertaining to the implementation of S.R.Scheme willbe governed by provisions of Reg.33(10) of DCR 1991 as modified from time to time.

2. The in situ FSI will be restricted to 1991 level i.e. as per DCR 1967 wherein in situ Zonal FSI of 1.25 plus additional 25% FSI for slum Scheme in CRZ-II in Mumbai City is permissible as per clarification issued by U.D. Dept. Govt, of Maharashtra under No. TPB-4306/456/UD-l 1 dated 19.04.2006.

3. To insist the revised NOC from MCZMA Department regarding the Development in the CRZ - II area and before granting CC to any of the Building in the Scheme.

4. To insist the revised NOC from MOEF department before exceeding construction area of 20000.00 Sq.Mts., as per the MOEF’s letter dated 17.01.2014.

4. Buildable Reservation of Nehru Center (Museum):As per D.P. Remarks 1991,the plot under reference is designed as existing

Nehru Science Center (Museum). It is be stated that as per provision of Clause 7,5 of Appendix IV of Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991, ‘Tor other buildable reservation on lands under slum where guideline approved by Government u/s. 31 of MR TP Act are not available, BUA equal to not more than 15% of entire plot or 25% of area under reservation in that plot whichever is less shall be demanded free of cost by SRA.

In the present case the plot excluding D.P. Road reservation area is designed as existing “Nehru Science Center”. Architect has stated that the ownership of major part of the plot, by way of 99 years lease has been transferred to NSC long back. The existing Nehru Science Center developed on the adjoining land has been developed, somewhere in the year 1980. Subsequently the plot under reference is encroached

»

I

upon by the hutment dwellers and the designation of existing “Nehru Science Centre

(Museum)” remained same in D.P. However the ownership rights (leasehold) being with Nehru Centre, the appropriate authority for handing over the reservation would

be Nehru Centre only and with that understanding only they have insisted buildable reservation while filing consent terms with developers. Architect has further clarified

that, the area of 15% buildable reservation mentioned in the consent terms is worked

out on the basis of plot are adm. 15,038.40 sq.mt. for CS no. 16/47 and CS no. 47(pt) (15% of 15,038.40 = 2255.76 sq.mtrs.) which is lease hold of Nehru Centre which

supports their above contention.

CEO (SRA)’s had apF>rov^ to allow the 15% implemented buildable reservation of Nehru Science Centre (Museum) as per Clause 7.5 of Appendix IV of Regulation

33(10) of DCR 1991.

5. ACCESS TO THE SCHEME:Dy. Ch E(Road) had accorded the approval for construction of Bridge on Nalla

for deriving access from IS.OOmt connecting to Annie Besant road. The Developer had constructed Bridge over the nalla (Completion at pg. ) hence the scheme is

deriving access from IS.OOmt D.P. Road.

6. HEIGHT RESTRICTION:As per the remarks, the plot is falling in the Height Restriction Zone around the

Nehru Center, as per the Regulation 31 (4) (a) of DCR 1991.

It is to mentioned that, the Restriction of height mentioned in the Regulation 31(4) (a), are not applicable for Development/implementation of Slum Rehabilitation

Scheme under Regulation 33(10) & 33(14)D, however the height of the Building shall

always be less than 6.00 Mts below the Existing Nehru Center.

Architect has submitted the plans for the proposed buildings in the S. R. Scheme layout, with the maximum height of the building as 67.90 Mts. Architect has furnish the height of Nehru center certified by Assistant Engineer, B.P(Survey) City as 79.375mt AMSL. As such the height permissible would be 79.375-6 = 73.375mt AMSL. As such the height proposed by Architect of 67.99 mt is approvable. However the NOC from Competent Authority for the proposed height shall be insisted before

granting further CC and condition to that affect in LOI.'5

\ , Exeoififve Engineer Dy. Ch. BnflinMrS.E. (S.R.A.) A.E.{S.u..'') G:-..: i<ci::;bilitation Authority Slum Rehabilitation

7* e l ig ib i l i t y o f t h e te n a n ts and tenem ent DENSTTV-A) Eligibility of the Scheme:

As per the Revised Annexure - II received from the Ward Officer (G/South)

under No. WOGS/328/SR/Colony on 30.12.1998, the Total 1040 Nos of residential

tenants and 01 No of Commercial Tenant are held eligible for alternate accommodation in the S. R. Scheme. Accordingly the LOI for the Scheme was issued on 04.01.2000, which was subsequently revised on 06.12.2004.

However on 15-11-2016, this office has received the corrected Annexure - II forthe Scheme issued by Competent Authority and final Scrutiny sheet forwarded by Dy.Collector (SRA). As per the said Annexure - II, the total nos. of 1031 tenements heldeligible. There are 1026 Nos. of rehab Residential Tenements 4 nos. of R/C and 1 no

of Comm, tenement are considered as Eligible for alternate Accommodauon in ihH

Scheme. The differentiation between earlier Annexure - II and Corrected Annexure - II is as Follows:

Sr,No.

Description

1 Issued under No.

Total Nos of the Existing Tenants of the Scheme

I-" Eligible Tenants of the Scheme Residentiala.

b. Commercial______c. Resi/Commerciald. Other Structures

Annexure - II dated 25-02-2013

Zopupra/uji/ Marriamanagar / karya - A/table/D-l/Kavi-10526/2013/30fi1516

1031 '1,026'

T o ta l_______________________Area for the Scheme certified

0104Nil103120500.00 So.Mts

B) Tenement Density:

The tenement density for the plot under S. R. Scheme is considered as 277.08T/ha, as the plot was falling under CRZ. The tenement density worked out is as follows:

I—a. Plot Area for the S. R. Scheme 20500.00 Scb. Deduction for road set back 2548.24 Soc. Deduction for Designation of Nehru Center 1901.00 Sod. Total deductions 4449.24 So1 e. Net plot area of Plot {9 16050.76 Sq

‘Tenements density required as per Clause 3.12 of Appendix-lV of Reg. 33(10) of DCR

(16050.76/1 =802.53 sav

w

1991.g- No. of tenements required to achieve

tenements density in proportionate to 1.66 FSI since being in CRZ-II and also as per note mentioned in Clause 10 of DCR 1967.

(1.6625/3 ) X 802= 444.44 say 444

h. Tenements considered for S.R. Scheme. 1031 Nos ^i. PAP tenements generated in the scheme Nil

8, Amenity Tenements:As per clause 8.1 of Appendix - IV of Regulation 33(10) of DCR 1991, 10 Nos. of

Balwadi, 10 Nos. of Welfare Center and 10 Nos. of Society Offices are required to be

proposed in the present scheme. Architect has proposed 03 Nos. of the Society Offices,

3 nos. of Balwadi and 3 nos. Welfare Center in wing “A”, 03 Nos. of the Society Offices,

3 nos. of Balwadi and 3 nos. Welfare Center in wing “B”, 02 Nos. of the Society Offices,

2 nos. of Balwadi and 3 nos. Welfare Center in wing “C” and 02 Nos. of the Society

Offices, 2 nos. of Balwadi and 2 nos. Welfare Center in wing “D” each admeasuring to

20.00 Sq.Mts. 20.90 Sq.Mts. respectively. Architect has considered the areas of the

Amenity Structures free of FSI and in Rehab Component and has requested to allow

the same.

The same is allowed, as per the Clause 8.1 of Appendix - IV of Regulation 33(10)

of DCR 1991 and further as per the clause 8.2 & 8.3 of Appendix - IV of Regulation 33

(10) of DCR 1991, the same are allowed to be considered in the Rehab component and

same are allowed free of FSI.

In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow 10 Nos. of Society

Office admeasuring to 20.00 Sq.Mts, 10 Nos of Welfare Centre and 10 Nos of Balwadi

admeasuring to 20.90 Sq.Mts for the S. R. Scheme, as per the Clause 8.1, 8.2 & 8.3 of

Appendix-IV of Clause 33(10) of DCR-1991.

9. LAYOUT FOR THE SCHEME:As per Regulation 21 of DCR 1991, where the plot area admeasures 1000.00

Sq.Mts or more the layout and subdivision proposals are insisted.

In the present case the plot area for the S. R. Scheme is 20500.00 Sq.Mts and the Architect has proposed 4 Nos. of Building in the layout. Hence the layout proposal shall be insisted. Architect vide his letter has requested this office for allowing him to submit the Layout file for the S. R. Scheme before issue of the Plinth CC to First

Rehab Building in the layout.

8.E.(S.R.A.)A.E,(^,R.A,) - ; . n d ^ a S A u lh o r lt , S lum R^ hS ii^ ioXhoH .y

Architect's request for allowing the approval for Layout of the Scheme befon issue of Plinth CC to any of the building in the layout can be considered.

10. SUBDIVISION OF THE PLOT:Architect has submitted the plans at Pg. 133, wherein he has shown the sub

division of the Plot for the S. R. Scheme under reference. The subdivision of the plot i:

consisting of subdivided plots as follows:

1 1 .

Sub Plot Area in Sq.Mts RemarksA 1901.00 Buildable Reservation. NSCB 2548.24 Road Setback.C 6696.88 Rehab Plot.D 9353.88 Sale Plot.

Total 20500.00

11.1 Physical R.G.:

The total plot area of the Scheme is 20500.00 Sq.Mts. and the net plot area foi the S. R. Scheme under reference is 15696.OOSq.Mts.

As per the Regulation 23 (1) (a) of DCR 1991, 25% of Physical R.G. has to bt kept open in the proposed Layout. However, as per clause 6.20 a minimum of atleas 8% of amenity open space shall have to be maintained.

As per the Hon'ble Supreme Court’s orders dated 17.12.2013, the Provisions o the Regulation 23 shall be strictly followed even though the Development is proposec under Regulation 33 (7).

The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order do not bar SRA for providing the Physica Amenity Open Space as per Regulation 23, however in this case the lOA to the Rehat Building was issued prior 17.12.2013. Hence as per the Hon’ble Supreme Court's orders dated 17.12.2013, the Physical Amenity Open Spaces can be proposed as pei

the provisions of Clause 6.20 of Appendix - IV of Regulation 33 (10) of DCR 1991.

Architect has proposed Physical R.G. of 1550.74 Sq.Mts. which equal to 9.88°/ of the Net plot area. The proposed Physical R.G. is in two places as shown on the plans at Pg. 131& in form of Paved Physical R.G. due to planning constraints. Furthei Architect has proposed the physical R.G. with odd shape & sub-slandered size m the layout and at a Distance of 5.00 Mts. (Min) from the proposed buildings.

D*

‘E’

I

In view of above, HonlDle CEO (SRA)'s orders are requested to allow proposing the Physical R.G. upto 8% instead of required 25% as per SRA’s policy in two different

places of odd shape 8& of sub-standard size and in the form of Partly Paved RG touching to the Building, as per Clause 6.20 read with Clause 6.24 of Appendix - IV of

DCR 1991.

11.2 Deductible R.G.:

As per Regulation 35 (1) (3) of DCR 1991 and as per Regulation 39 (a) (vii) of

DCR 1967, 15% R.G. has to be deducted from total plot area for the computation of

FSI purpose which works out to (15696 x 15% = 2354.40 Sq.Mts). Architect has requested not to insist the deduction of 15% Deductible R.G. while computing the FSI statement/ Scheme parameters as he has proposed to achieve the tenement density as per SRAs policy by providing the PAP tenements to the scheme.

As per 3.12 of Appendix - IV, minimum density of 500T/Ha has to be achieved in S. R. Scheme. Further as per, clause 3.13 of Appendix - IV, where the existing

tenement density is more than, 500 T/Ha the calculation of FSI for all purpose shall be on gross area, i.e. without deducting the recreation or amenity open space. In this

case the Total 1041 Nos of the Eligible tenements are proposed to be accommodated and 784 T/d is achieved as per the Clause 3.12 of Appendix- IV. Hence as per the clause 3.13 of Appendix - IV of Regulation 33 (10) DCR 1991 read with the clause (b) of Point 2.4 of this report as mentioned above, the deduction of Physical Amenity

Open Space may not be insisted, if agreed by Hon’ble CEO (SRA).In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested not to insist the

deduction of 15% AOS for the S. R. Scheme under reference, as per clause 3.12 read with 3.13 of Appendix - IV of DCR 1991.

12. PROJECT PLANNING:Architect has submitted the plans as at Pg. I l l to 133 for the proposed Rehab

Building No. 1 on Sub-Plot‘A ’ having 4 wings.

Architect has not submitted the Plans for the Sale Building of the Scheme and

has mentioned that, the same will be submitted at later stage and the proposal/approval for concessions involved in the Sale building will be put up separately. At present the Architect has marked the Sub-Plot ‘D* for the Development

of the Sale Building.

S.E(S,RA)A.E.(3A,-: ::

Further it is to mention that, the Planning for the Designation of Nehru Center

is also not submitted by the Architect and he has mentioned in the letter that, the

same will be processed separately after obtaining the necessary cognizance from the Existing Nehru Center for the Planning purpose. The Architect has proposed the Sub-

Plot ‘B* for the development of the Designation Built Up Area to be handed over to Competent Authority.

13. REHAB BUILDING No. 1Architect has submitted the plans for rehab Building No. 1 as at Pg. I l l to 133.

From the plans it can be seen that, the Rehab Building No. 1 as Wing A ' 'B’ ‘C’ & “D” are comprises of Basement + Ground + to IS* Floors for wing “A”, Basement Ground + 1® to 15^ for wing “B”, Basement + Ground + 1® to 15 for wing “C” having Height of 46.40 Mts and Basement + Ground + 1® to 21® + 22"^(pt) for wing “D”, having Height of 67.90 Mts. Each Wing in all the Rehab Buildings is proposed ^ with two Nos, of 1.50 Mts wide Staircase and four Nos. of the Lifts.

The General Planning of all the Rehab Buildings is as follows:

1. The Rehab buildings are proposed with rehabilitation units having Carpet area of each individual tenant as 25.00 Sq.Mts.

2. The Amenity Tenements as per Clause 8.1 of Appendix - IV are proposed at Ground Floor level of Each wing.

3. Architect has proposed 2.00 Mts wide Passage connecting the Staircases and Lifts as well as providing the access to each Rehab unit. The said Passage upto 2.00 Mts

width is considered free of FSI while computing the FSI statement and has been considered towards Rehab Component.

4. The Area under Staircase, Lift, Lobbies, etc. is considered free of FSI and has requested to allow the same without charging premium. ^

5. The Service Ducts for Fire Fighting & Electrical Conduits are proposed at each Floor in all Rehab Building, as per the Requirement mentioned in the Regulation 35 (a) (ii) of DCR 1967.

6. Architect has proposed Meter Room/Electric Cabin at ground Floor of each Building has considered the same free of FSI as per the provisions of Regulation 51 (vi) (b) of Part VII of DCR 1967.

7. The Elevation Features in Form of the 1.20 Mts wide Flower Bed is proposed in Rehab Building. The same is allowed as per Regulation 37 (a) (ii) of Part VII of DCR 1967. The area of the same is considered free of FSI as per Regulation 51 (vi) (b) of Part VII of DCR 1967.

\

14. Tenements statement proposed in Rehab BuildinQFloor Rehab Wing A Total

Rehab Resi. R/C Balwadi Welfare Center Society officeGr. 00 04 03 03 03 132nd to 6^ 18X 6 - - - - — — 1087th 12 - - - - — - - 12

to 15th 18X 8 144Total 277

Floor Rehab Wing B TotalRehab Resi. office Balwadi Welfare Center Society office

Gr. 06 01 03 03 03 162nd to 6 h 18X 6 - - - - 108yth 12 — — — - - 128th to 15 h 18X 8 144Total 280

Floor Rehab Wing C TotalRehab Resi. R/C Balwadi Welfare Center Society office

Gr. 08 - - 02 02 02 142nd to 6th 16X 6 - - - - — 967th 11 — — - - — 118th to 15th 16X 8 — — - - — 128Total 249

Floor Rehab Wing D TotalRehab Resi. R/C Balwadi Welfare Center Society office

Gr. 02 - - 02 02 02 081st to 6th 12 X 6 — - - — — 727th 08 - - - - — — 088th to 14th 12 X 7 - - - - - - - - 8415th 08 — - - — 0816th to 2 1st 12X 6 7222"<* 03 — — — - - 03Total 255

15. High Rise Rehab Building;It can be seen that, Architect has proposed the High Rise Buildings in notional

sub-divided plot ‘C’ and has requested to allow high rise building in the scheme under

reference, with the maximum height of the buildings as 67.90 Mts. Architect has

mentioned that, due to planning constraints and to accommodate the Eligible rehab

Exacujiv^ Engineer - .Ichm iiitation Authority

Dy. Ch. Engineer Slum Rehabilitation Authority

Tenants of the Scheme, he has proposed the Rehab Buildings with height More than24.00 Mts.

The High Rise buildings for Rehabilitation of eligible tenants may be allowed,

subject to submission of agreement being signed on stamp paper between society and

the developer to undertake essential maintenance of electro mechanical and civil work

for the period of ten years from grant of occupation certificate. Being High rise rehab

building the following conditions will be incorporated in the LOI:

a) The Project Management Consultants (PMC) with prior approval of EE

(SRA)/Dy.Ch.E (SRA) for the implementation/ Supervision/ Completion of the

S.R. Scheme, shall be appointed by the Developer.

b) The PMC appointed for the Scheme shall submit quarterly progress report to the

Slum Rehabilitation Authority after the issue of Letter of Intent.

c) The Third Party Quality Auditor (TPQA) with prior approval of EE

(SRA)/Dy.Ch.E (SRA) for quality audit of building work at various stages, shall be appointed by the Developer.

d) The Registered Tri-Partite Agreement among Developer, Slum Societies & Lift

Suppljdng Co. /Firm for comprehensive maintenance of the Electro Mechanical

systems such as pumps, lifts etc. for a period of 10 years from the date of issue

of occupation certificate to the Rehabilitation/Composite building as per

circular No. SRA/ENG/2364 of 29,/05/2008 shall be submitted by developer.

e) Installation of the firefighting systems as per requirement of CFO and execution

of tri-partite agreement for comprehensive maintenance for the period of 10

years shall be carried out by developer.

f) Vetting of another structural engineer to review the structural design of the

building in the scheme shall be submitted.

In view of above, HonTile CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow High-Rise

Rehab Buildings for accommodating existing slum tenements of the Scheme subject to above mentioned conditions.

16. Carpet area of Rehab unitsArchitect has proposed Rehab Building No. 1 as Wing ‘A’ ‘B* ‘C' & “D” are

comprises of Basement + Ground + 1®* to 15^ Floors for wing “A”, Basement

Ground + l®t to 15* for wing “B”, Basement + Ground + 1st 15' for wing “C”

having Height of 46.40 Mts and Basement + Ground + 1® to 16' + 17*»> (pt) for wing

“D”, having Height of 49.30 Mts. for Rehab tenements having carpet area as 25.00

Sq.Mts as per Government Notification issued under No. TPB/4312/CR -

3/2012/(camp)/UD - 11 dated 28.06.2012. The detailed sizes of the rooms are as

tabulated below:

Room Proposed Sizes & Area in Sq.MtsLiving Room 3.20X2.90 = 9.28Alcove 2.35 X 1.70 = 4.00Passage 1.03x 1.08 = 1.11Room 3.20x 2.35 = 7.52WC 1.03 X 1.08 = 1.11Bath 1.23 X 1.53 = 1.88Total 25.11 Sq.Mts

From above table it can be seen that, Architect has proposed the inadequate

sizes of the rooms of the Rehab units. Architect has mentioned that, due to proposed

two Room & Alcove arrangement of tenement with carpet area 25.00 Sq.Mts (269.10

Sq.Fts) it is difficult to propose the room sizes with minimum requirement of DCR

1991. As such, due to the planning constraint and to provide two room kitchen/alcove

tenements, architect has requested to allow the same.

Here to mention that, as per the Clause 6.2 of Appendix-IV of Regulation 33(10)

of DCR-1991, separate Kitchen shall not be necessary and cooking place

Kitchen/Alcove shall be allowed without any minimum size restrictions. As such the

minimum size of the Alcove proposed by Architect having carpet area of 4.67 Sq.Mts

shall be allowed.

CEO (SRA) is empowered to grant relaxation in room sizes as stipulated in Table

18 of Regulation 38 of DCR 1991 read with clause 6.24 of modified Regulation 33(10)

of DCR 1991. As such the inadequate sizes as proposed by the Architect can be

allowed.

‘G’

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)'s approval is requested to adopt the two

Room/Alcove tenement with carpet area 25.00 Sq.Mts. (269.10 Sq.Fts.) along with the

substandard size of kitchen/Living room/Bed Room in each Rehab Building, as per

the provisions of Clause 6.2 & 6.3 read with 6.24 of Appendix-IV of reg. 33(10) of

DCR-1991.

S.E (S.R.A.) A.E (S.Ercciirtve Engineeri :h:ibii!tation Authority Slum Rthsbiliutfon AuthoHty

17. ORNAMENTAL PRQJECTTOW

H’

Architect has proposed ornamental projection/Architectural features upto 1.2

mtr. including enclosed balcony from building line with per fioor level difference i

0.30 mtr. from floor level for Rehab tenements under Regulation 30(e) (ii) and claimc

its area free of FSI as per Reg. 35(2) read with Clause 3.8 of Appendix IV (

Regulation33(10) of DCR 1991.

In view of above CEO(SRA)'s approval is requested to allow ornamenU

projection/ Architectural features upto 1.20 mtr. Width as per Regulation 30(e) (i

allowing it’s area free of FSI for Rehab building as per Reg. 35(2) of reads with claus

3.8 of Appendix IV of Regulation 33(10) of DCR 1991.

Parking spaces for Rehab Build ings:

As per the present Notification u/no. TPB/4308/507/CR-76/2008/UD-1

dated 12-08-2009, the parking requirement as per the provision of Clause 36 of DCI

1991 are modified. As per the said modification, the rehab tenements of 25.00 sq.mtr

^ so comes under the purview of parking @ 1 no. of parking per 8 nos. of tenements.

1 Carpet area111_______________________________________________________

Total no. of tenements

Parkingpermissible as per D.C. Reg.

Parkingrequirement

[ Up to 35 sq.mtr.1

1031 1 parking for 8 nos. tenements

128.87 Say 129

; 35 to 45 sq.mt. Ni — -

1 parking for 4 tenements

Nil

j 25% additional par 1 Total Parking reoui

king for visitor (129x25%) 32.25 32red 161

' lotai parking proposed 161 ^

Architect has proposed the mechanical stack parking in the basement. Architecl

has mentioned that the same is proposed due to planning constraint,

j In view of above CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the 161 nos. of cai

, parking in basement per the requirement of Reg. 36 of DCR 1991 & subject tc

; submission of NOC from E.E. (TStC) before granting Plinth C.C. to rehab building.

19. BASEMENTArchitect has proposed the single level basement partly flush to ground on

between the two wings 85 1.20 mt. above ground of building, with 6.00 mt. wide ramp

& AA class slab for top of basement of building under reference. Architect will be

insisted to be submitted NOC from E.E (T85C) before plinth CC for parking layout.

The detail o f the basement proposed is as under:

a] Area:Architect has proposed constructed basement on the BUA admeasuring

5206.40 sq. mt. As against the permissible i.e. twice the plinth area or plot area which

ever is less. The same is within permissible B.p.A. as per regulations 38(9) i.e. within

lesser area o f twice the plinth area and plot area.

b] Height o f the basement:

Architect has proposed the basement with clear height o f 5.60 mt. upto ceiling.

Height below beam is 4.40 mt. Architect has proposed the basement flush with the

ground level for the portion extending beyond building line upto 1.20 mt. above

ground level within building line which confirms as per clause 38(9) (ii) of Rehab bldg.

c] Ventilation:License Surveyor has constructed the ventilation from the opening of 1.20 mt.

heights above ground level proposed within bldg. line for light and ventilation.

Remarks of Chief Engineer, Mechanical/Elpctrical department of M.C.G.M. for

adequacy o f light and ventilation will be insisted before CC, the condition to that effect

will be incorporated the draft LOI.

d] Access:

The Access to the basement for car park is through the 6.00 mt. wide ramp

having sloop of 1:10 85 the additional staircase/lift is extended up to basement.

e] User:

The basement is constructed mainly for the parking purpose which confirms as

per clause 38 (9) (iii) (d). The area of the basement is claimed free of F.S.I. as per

regulation 35(2) (f) read with regulation 36 (5) and 38 (9) (iii) (d).

U s .E-IS.RA|a .e ;F':cculw6^ngmeer .

. -.lim itation Authority 8*um«tfi«Wi.tation AuthdHI

In view of above CEO(SRA)’ s orders are requested to allow the single level

basement with top slab o f basement at 1.20 mtr. above ground level with 4.40 mtr.

clear height below the beam bottom for parking purpose accessible by two way ramp

with 6.00 mtr. free of FSI as per Regulation 38(9) read with 35(2) Clause 3.8 and 6.24

of DCR 1991 subject to submission o f NOC from CFO and NOC from E.E.(T&C) for

parking layout before asking Plinth C.C.

20. SERVICE DUCTArchitect has proposed ventilation to bath room Ss W.C. of Rehab tenements

through duct o f size 1.33 mtr. X 1.55 mtr. 8s 0.68 mtr. x 1.33 which is deficient.

As per provisions of Reg. 34(a) (ii), whep only water closet & baths abuts the

chowk then one of its dimensions may be 8' feet (2.4 mtr.) its area need not exceed

200 sq.ft. (18.58 sq.mtr.) for any height. However, as per Clause 6.22 of Appendix-]^ of Reg. 33(10). ™

In view of above CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow deficient size duct for

ventilation o f Bath and W.C. for rehab tenements in the Rehab building as per Reg.

35(2) read with clause 3.8 and 6.24 of Appendix-IV o f Reg. 33(10).

21. ELECTRIC METER ROOM:-Architect has proposed two nos. of electric meter room on each wing of Rehab

building admeasuring 4.34 sq.mtr. at ground floor. Architect has claimed its area free

of FSI as per Reg. 35(2) read with clause 3.8 and 6.24 of Appendix-IV o f Reg. 33(10) of

DCR 1991 subject to submission o f remarks/TOC from concerned electric supply co.

22. ELECTRIC DUCT

Architect has proposed one duct on each staircase for services of electric w ir in g

in rehab building on each separate wing with area admeasuring 0.62 X 1.01, 0.62 X

1.16. Architect has claimed its area free o f FSI as per Reg. 35(2) read with clause 3.8

and 6.24 o f Appendix-IV o f Reg. 33(10) o f DCR 1991.

23. FIRE DUCT

Architect has proposed fire duct on adjacent to staircase o f rehab building on

each separate wing with area admeasuring 0.62 X 1.01 85 0.62 1.16. Architect has

requested to allow the same being part of building service as same is required for the

water lines for firefighting system. Since the, building under reference is high rise

rehab building. Architect has claimed its area free of FSI.

In view of above CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow fire duct with its area

free of FSI as per Clause 6.24 of Appendix-IV of Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991, subject to

submission of CFO NOC before granting Plinth C.C. to the Rehab building.

24. TRAVEL DISTANCE:

Architect has proposed upto 15.12 mtr, travel distance between staircase 85

dead end of the corridor main entry door to rehab tenements.

However, reference is requested to the regulation 43 (2)(ii) the required travel

distance is 11.25 mt. from an exit o f farthest point o f Rehab unit to the staircase. As

against the same, Architect has proposed the travel distance to the extent of 15.12

mtr from staircase to farthest point of exit o f rehab unit.■ 'i

In view o f above, Hon^ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to condone the

travel distance o f 15.12 mtrmt. from staircase to farthest point of exit of rehab unit

without charging premium subject to the submission of CFO's NOC as per provisions

of clause 6.24 of sub regulation 33(10) of DCR 1991.

25. NOC FROM CFO & REFUGE AREA:

The height of Composite building is more than 24.00 Mt as such the C.F.O.

NOC is required. Architect has requested to insist the same before granting plinth

C.C.

Referring clause 44 (7) (a) (ii) of modified DCR 1991 in multi storied and high■ '1

rise building having height more than 30 Meters, 1® refuge shall be provided at 24 mt.

thereafter the refuge area shall be provided at every 7 * habitable floor. The refuge

area shall be 4% of the habitable floor it serves, and will be free of FSI. If it exceeds

4%, the excess area shall be counted in FSI

Architect has proposed Rehab building consisting of Basement + Ground + 1st

to 15* Floors for wing “A” , Basement + Ground + 1®* to 15^ for wing “B” , Basement

+ Ground + 1® to 15* for wing “C” having Height o f 46.40 Mts and Basement +

Ground + 1® to 21®*85 22 " for wing “D”having height 67.90 mtrs.

Architect has proposed refuge area at different location as mentioned below.

Dy. Ch. Engineer E xoe tiit/e Eng ineer gium A«hal»UiUtion AuthoHfty

::: nohab ilita tlo n Authority

Wing Floor Refuge Area Required ip

sq.mtr.

Refuge Area Proposed in

sq.mtr.

Excess Area Proposed in

sq.mtr.A 7th 183.43 183.45 0.02B 7th 186.62 186.79 0.17C 7th 164.61 164.91 0.30D

7th 108.11 117.35 9.2415th 87.56 117.35 29.79

Total Excess Refuge area proposed 39.52

From the above table it is seen that Architect has proposed Refuge area more

than permissible area. Architect has counted the excess area in FSI for the composite

building as per Clause 44 (7) (a) (i) 8s (ii) modified DCR dated 06/01/2012

In view o f above, CEO (SRA)'s approval -is requested to allow Refuge area f r e e ^

FSI up to 4% & to allow excess refuge area by counting in FSI as per 44 (7) (a) (i) & (ii)

of modified DCR dated 06/01/2012 of DCR 1991 subject to NOC from CFO before

granting C.C. to the respective buildings.

26. LONG LENGTH FACTOR

As per Reg. 29(l)(b)(a) o f DCR 1991, if the length or depth of building exceeds

40.00 mtr. an additional width of 10% of the dimension in excess of 40.00 mtr. shall

be required on the side or rear open space as the case may be;

In this instant case Architect has proposed Rehab wing “A” , “B” & “C” o f rehab

building with length more than 40.00 mtr., i.e. 57.90 mtr. (maximum) which is

required to provide the necessary rehab tenements with required nos. eligible

tenements. Further as per SRA policy guideline maximum open space required for

Rehab building is 6.00 mtr. and hence the Architect has requested not to implement

Reg. 29(l)(b)(a) to the composite building.

In view of above CEO(SRA)'s orders are requested not to apply the long length

factor as mentioned above to the proposed composite building as per Clause 6.24 of

Appendix IV of Reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991.

27. OPEN SPACE:

Architect has proposed Rehab building consisting of Basement *■ Ground + 1®

to 15th Floors for wing “A”, Basement + Ground + l®t to 15th for wing “B”, Basement

+ Groxind + l^t to 15 for wing “C” having Height of 46.40 Mts and Basement +

Ground + 1st to 21st + 22^ (pt) for wing “D” having height 67.90 mtrs.

As per Clause 6.11 o f 33(10) of appendix IV of DCR 1991 the minimum front &

marginal open space required for height of building more than 24.00 mt. is 6.00 mt.

Architect has requestedthat the NOC from Chief fire officer will be submitted for the

same before obtain Plinth C.C. The same condition shall be incorporated in revised LOI.

The open spaces are tabulated in detail as shown below:

Height of the Wing "A” 46.40 mtr.

L/V & D/W required 6.00 mtr. for Rehab building as per Clause 6.11 of 33(10).

Joint open space 12.00.

Side Open Space Req. Open space Pro Defi. Dei in % RemarkEast 6.00 10.30 Nil Nil SOSWest 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with Wing BNorth 3.00 3.25 Nil Nil FOSSouth 6.00 6.00 Nil Nil SOS


Height o f the Wing "B” 46.40 mtr.

L/V 8& D/W required 6.00 mtr. for Rehab building as per Clause 6.11 o f 33(10).


Side Open Space Req. Open space Pro Defi. Dei in % RemarkEast 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with Wing CWest 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with Wing ANorth 3.00 3.00 Nil Nil FOSSouth 6.00 More than 6.00 Nil Nil ROS


Height of the Wing “C” 46.40 mtr.

L/V & D/W required 6.00 mtr, for Rehab building as per Clause 6 .11 of 33(10),


Side Open Space Req. Open space Pro Defi. Dei in % RemarkEast 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with wing “B”West 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with wing "D”North 3.00 3.00 Nil Nil FOSSouth 6.00 More than 6.00 Nil Nil ROS

S.E.(S.R.A.)A.E.(jfe.RA)rr r- Dv. Ch. Engineer

Atthorit^ Au thorily


Height of the Wing “D” 67.90mtr.

L/V 85 D/W required 6.00 mtr. for Rehab building as per Clause 6.11 of 33(10).


Side Open Space Req. Open space Pro Defi. Dei in % RemarkEast 12.00 9.00 3.00 25% JOS with wing “IWest 6.00 More than 6.00 Nil Nil SOSNorth 3.00 3.00 Nil Nil FOSSouth 6.00 6.00 Nil Nil SOS

It is seen from the above table that:-

i. Maximum Deficiency in open space for the Composite building is 25% i.e. on

East 85 West side.

Architect has requested to condone deficiency in the open space for thq^

Composite building as per provision of Clause 6.22 and for sale building as per

provision of Clause 6.23 8s 6.24 of Appendix-IV of Reg. 33(10) o f DCR 1991.

In view o f the above CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to condone the deficiency'

in open space for the Rehab building maximum up to 25.00% without charging

premium as per provision of Clause 6.22 86 6.24 o f Appendix-IV of DCR 33(10),

subject to submission of CFO’s NOC before granting C.C. for Rehab building.

28. TO ALLOW AREA OF STRAIRCASE, LIFT, LIFT LOBBY. LIFT MACHINE ROOM, STAIRCASE ROOM AREA FREE OF F.S.I WITHOUT CHARGING PREMIUM:-

Architect has submitted the plans for rehab Building No. 1 as at Pg. I l l to 133.

From the plans it can be seen that, the Rehab Building No. 1 as Wing ‘A ’ ‘B’ ‘C ’ 8b “D”

are comprises of Basement + Ground + 1® to 15^ Floors for wing “A”, Basement ^

Ground + 1®* to 15* for wing “B”, Basement + Ground + 1®* to 15* for wing “C”

having Height o f 46.40 Mts and Basement + Ground + 1® to 21®*+ 22* **(pt) for wing

“D”, having Height of 67.90 Mts. Each Wing in all the Rehab Buildings is proposed

with two Nos. o f 1.50 Mts wide Staircase and four Nos. o f the Lifts Stair case room

and Lift Machine Room, free of FSI without charging premium.

Now as per DCR 35(2)(iii) (iv) of modified DCR-1991, above mentioned area are

allowed free o f FSI with special permission of Commissioner. As per clause 6.21 of

Appendix-IV of DCR-33 (10) o f DCR-1991, premium shall not be charge for exclusion

4 >

of above areas as covered under DCR-35(2) (ii) & (iii) for composite and rehab

building.

In view o f above, CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the proposed Rehab

building with two staircase & four lifts and to allow area under staircase, lift, lift

lobby, staircase room and lift machine room areas above topmost storey of rehab

building free o f FSI without charging premium as per clause.35 (2) (iii) & (iv) of

modified DCR 1991 read with clause 6.21 of Appendix-IV o f reg.33 (10) of DCR-1991

29. ELECTRIC SUB-STATION:

As per Regulation 39 (a) (xi) of DCR 1967 Electric Sub-Station is required to be provided.

Accordingly the Architect has proposed One No. of Electric Sub-Station for S. R." Scheme under reference at Ground level at a distance of 3.00 Mts from from Bldg. line

as shown on the plans at Pg. 131 of size 93.50 sq.mtr. for switch gear covers room & Transformer room in combination and claimed free o f F.S.I.

As per Regulation 51 (vi) (b) of DCR 1967 the Electric substation is allowed free

of FSI. However, the specific NOC from concern Electrical Supply Agency for location

and size o f the proposed substation vrili be insisted before issue of Plinth CC.

In view of above, Honb>le CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow One No. of

Electrical Substation for Proposed Scheme as shown on the plan at Pg. 131, free of

FSI as per Regulation 51 (vi) (b) of DCR, subject to submission o f NOC from Electrical

Supply Agency for location and size of the proposed substation, before issue of Plinth CC of Rehab Building.

30. COMPUTATION OF PARAMETERS*Sr.No.

Description Proposed LOI Parameter In Sq.Mts.

1. Plot area for the Scheme 20500.002. Deductions for

a. Road Set Back 2548.24b. Buildable Reservation 1901.00

Total 4449.243. Net Plot area 16050.764. Deduction for Physical R.G. (if Any) Nil5. Balance Plot area 16050.76

r / ^ ./ / n A I A r A * V E x c c ^ ^ e E n g in ee r

S.E. \ S . K ( ^ A.fc.(S/it.A.) CJLiii Rehabilitation Authority

Dy. Ch. EnghNfin— TStum Rehabilitation AutheHt^

6. Addition for FSI purposea. Road Set Back 2548.24b. Buildable Reservation 1901.00

Total 4449.247. Total Plot area for FSI purpose 20500.008. FSI Permissible 1.66259. Total Built up area permissible for the Scheme 34081.25 J10. Rehab Built up area proposed 30358.2111. Rehab Component proposed 37084.9912. Sale Component permissible (11 X 0.75%) 27813.7413. Total permissible BUA for the Scheme {10+12) 58171.9514. Total FSI sanctioned for the Scheme (13/7) 2.8415. In-situ Sale Built up area permissible (9-10) 3723.0416. Total Proposed BUA for the Scheme (10+16) 34081.2517. Total FSI Consumed (17/7) 1.6618. TDR Generated from the scheme (12 - 15) 24090.7019. No. Tenements to be rehabilitated 1031

a. Residential 1026b. Residential cum Commercial 04c. Commercial 01d. Religious Structures Nile. PAP Tenements Nilf. Existing office 01

20. Amenity Tenements proposed 30a. Balwadi 10b. Society Office 10c. Welfare Center 10

In view o f above, Hon'ble CEO (SRA)'s approval is requested to sanction the

above parameters for proposed scheme under reference and issue the Revised LOI

accordingly. ^

31. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT:License Surveyor has proposed Composite and Sale buildings in the slum

rehabilitation scheme under reference. Hence, the Developer shall be insisted to

appoint the Project Management Consultant for the supervision of all high rise

buildings in the scheme as per circular dated 08-06-2008.A Condition to that effect

will be incorporated in the Letter Of Intent.

32. THIRD PARTY QUALITY AUDITOR ITPOAl: 'As per circular dated 08-06-2008, structural vetting & third Party quality audit

for quality of proposed high rise buildings at various stages shall be insisted in the

Slum Rehabilitation Scheme under reference 85a condition to that effect will be

incorporated in the Letter Of Intent. -------------- , I

33. DEFECT LIABILITY:

As per circular No. 108 dated 22.01.2010, for proposed building to be

constructed in the S.R. Scheme under reference, the defect liability for Composite

buildings i.e. repairing and re-modification will be for period o f 3 years from the date

of occupation of the respective building. A condition to that effect will be incorporated

in draft LOI.

0 3 SURRENDER ALL THE EARLIER lOA FILE.

In this case the lOA for proposed 5 nos. of Rehab building was approved and

issued under no. 1. SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP dated 14/05/2002 for rehab building

no. 1 2) SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP dated -03/05/2010 for rehab building no.2,

3)SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP dated 03/05/2010 for Rehab building no. 3,

4)SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP dated 03/05/2010 for Rehab building no. 4 & 5)

SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP dated 03/05/2010 for Rehab building no, 5. lOA for the

constructed building with carpet area 20.90 sq.mtr. under no.

SRA/ENG/665/GS/ML/AP is convert in Temporary Transit camp. Now Architect has /

submit the application for revised LOI with change in planning with change o f carpet

^ area for rehab tenements i.e. 20,90 sq.mtr. to 25.00 sq.mtr and proposed only one no.

of Rehab building with 4 nos. of wings for 1031 tenements. Architect has requested to

surrender the 4 nos. o f said lOA file and issue the new file for proposed rehab

building. '

In view of above CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to surrender all the 4 nos. of

file and generate the new file with new lOA no. for proposed Rehab building in S.R.

Scheme.

In the view of above, CEO (SRA)’s

1. Orders are requested to para sidelined marked to* B’, to *E% ‘J ' to ‘M’ fis‘0 ’ to ‘Q’

• I

2. And approval is requested to sidelined marked para 'C , *F’ to ‘1% ‘N% & ‘R ’ to ‘T’

of above report.

3. Draft Letter o f Intent is at page 165 to 169.

a ^ £ 2O c rJ

A/i)i\eckS.E.(SRA)G/S A.E.(|RA)G/S ,& ^ S R A ) City

o j,cK ^ (S R A ) .

CEOISRAISir

g . 3T. ^FnrhwWTfy^ir?vT

- ] 6 [ ^

C'C-X- y ^

fr r r i^ -c r k e J 2 ^ ^

l c n r'm r^ s , 7 ) e M J

t p f 'X- S(/—

fh Q, ^

V t f '

CEO / SRA

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

SRA/ ENG/ 317 / GS / ML/ LOI

Sub:- Revised LOI for S.R. Scheme on plot bearing partC.S,No.47 and 16/47 of Lower Parel Division situated at Dr. A.B. Road, Mumbai in G/S Ward for "Mariamma Nagar SRA CHS.Ltd."

Architect : Shri Pravin Naik of M/s. Pravin Naik & Associates.

Developer : M/s. Akshay Sthapathya Pvt.Ltd.

Society : "Mariamma Nagar SRA CHS.Ltd."

Resubmitted :

Noting on prepage N-1 to N-27 and direction given by Hon. CEO/SRA on page no. N-27 may please be perusal.

Hon CEO/SRA has directed that "check and examine the proposal as per the norms of new notification dated 01/10/2016 and resubmit.

As per Hon CEO/SRA direction it is to submit that the subjected S.R. Scheme proposal is falls under CRZ-II. The FSI in the CRZ-II is 1.33 + 25% incentive is allowed as per Govt, of Maharashtra direction & same is considered for FSI purpose. Considering tenement density as per clause 3.12 of Appendix IV o f Reg.33(10) of DCR 1991 is 802 which is more than 650 person/hectare. Due to high density the notification issued dtd. 01/10/2016 is not considered at this stage and only eligible slum dwellers are considered for rehabilitation. Further Developer/Architect has proposed concession for rehab building.

In view of the above, the proposal submitted on Pg. N-1 to N-27 marked as "XX" may please be approved.

Hon. CEOfSRAISir,

S.E.(G/S) A.E.(G/S)

S . F U

ASLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

►

No. SRA/ENG/317/GS/ML/LOI

Architect : M/s. Pravin Naik & Associates 003, Gr. Fioor, Sukhsagar CHS,New Prabhadevi Road, Mumbai-400 025.

2. Developer : M/s. Akshay Sthapatya Pvt Ltd 401, Raheja Chamber, Nariman Point,Mumbai - 400 021.

3. Society : “Mariamma Nagar SRA CHS Ltd.”

Subject : Prop S.R. Scheme. On Plot Bearing C.S. No. 47(pt) of Lower Parel divn.

Near Nehru Planetarium, Worli, Mumbai-400018, for “Mariamma

Nagar SRA CHS LTD.”

Ref : SRA/ENG/317/GS/ML/LOI.

Gentleman,

With reference to the above mentioned Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Prop

S.R. Scheme. On Plot Bearing C.S. No. 47(pt) of Lower Parel divn. near Nehru

Planetarium, Worli, Mumbai-400018, for “Mariamma Nagar SRA CHS LTD.”, this

office is pleased to inform you that this Revised Letter of Intent is considered and

approved for the sanctioned FSI o f 2.84 (Two point Eight Four only) in accordance

i with provisions of Appendix - IV of Reg. 33 (10) of amended D.C. Regulations 1991,

Maximum in-situ FSI of 1.6625 (One point Six Six Two Five only) shall be allowed

to be consumed on the plot, subject to the following conditions.

1. This Letter of Intent is issued on the basis of plot area certified by the Architect and the Annexure - II issued by Competent Authority and other relevant documents.

2. This LOI is valid for the period of 3(three) months from the date of issue. However, if lOA/CC are obtained for any one bldg. of the project then this LOI will remain valid till validity of lOA/CC.

3. The built up area for sale and rehabilitation shall be as per the following scheme parameters. In the event of change in area of plot, nos of eligible huts etc. the parameters shall be got revised from time to time.

Adm inistrative Building, Anant Kanekar Marg, Bandra(E}, Mum bai- 400051

I 1 ^ 1 . ; 022-26565800/26590405/1879 Fa^^^^2-26590457 Website ; www.5ra.e0v.in E-mail

Execjfeye^ngineer Dy. Ch.S.E. (S.R.A.) A.E.(S.R.A.) s lum Reh«r^litation Aut’ ''nty Rthab llita tlon Authority

http://www.5ra.e0v.in


The salient features o f the scheme are as under:Sr.No.

Description Proposed LOI Parameter

^ ------ 1 In Sn.Mts. ii 1. J Plot area for the Scheme 20500.00 I

2. i Deductions for------------------ _l

1 1 a. Road Set Back 2548.24 'j b. Buildable Reservation 1901,00 '

1— J- - . Total 4449.24 j3.I------ Net Plot area 16050.76 '4- Deduction for Physical R.G. fif Any) Nil !5. Balance Plot area 16050.76 '6. Addition for FSI purpose

------- a. Road Set Back 2548.24b. Buildable Reservation 1901.00

Total 4449.247. Total Plot area for FSI purpose 20500 00 18. FSI Permissible 1.6625 j9. Total Built up area permissible for the Scheme 34081.25

_ 10. Rehab Built up area proposed 30358 21 '11. Rehab Component proposed 37084.99 112. Sale Component permissible (11 X 0.75%) 27813.74 !13.------ i-f Total permissible BUA for the Scheme (10+12) 58171,9514. Total FSI sanctioned for the Scheme (13/7) 2.84 ,15. In-situ Sale Built up area permissible (9-10) 3723.0416. Total Proposed BUA for the Scheme (10+16) 34081.25 ,17. Total FSI Consumed (17/7) 1.66 '18.1 No. Tenements to be rehabilitated J031 j1-------- a. Residential ] 1026^

b. Residential cum Commercial 04------- Lc. Commercial 01 '

j d. Religious Structures .\il 11e. PAP Tenements I Nil 11f. Existing office 1 01

19.| Amenity Tenements proposed 30 Ij a. Balwadi 10 i

—4- b. Society Office i 101c. Welfare Center j 10

4. This LOI is issued on the basis of documents submitted by the applicant. If any of the document submitted by Architect / Developer /Society or Owner are proved fraudulent/misappropriated before the Competent Court/HPC and if directed by Competent Court /HPC to cancel the LOI, then the LOI is Iiab/* to be cancelled and concerned person/Society /Developer/Architect are liable for action under version provision of IPC 1860 and Indian Evidence Act. 1872.

5. The Developer shall pay Rs. 20,000/- per tenement towards Maintenance Deposit and shall also pay Infrastructural Development charges @ Rs. 560/- (Suburb)/ Rs. 840/- (City) per sq.mt.} to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority as per Circular no.7 dated 25/ 11/ 1997 as decided by the Authority.

6 . The Amenity Tenements of Anganwadi as mentioned in salient features

condition no.3 above shall be handed over to the Woman and Child Welfare Department, Government of Maharashtra as per Circular No. 129. Welfare

Centre, Society Office as mentioned in salient features condition no.3 above shall be handed over to the slum dwellers society to use for specific purpose only, within 30 days from the date of issue of OCC of Rehab/Composite bldg. handing over / Taking over receipt shall be submitted to SRA by the developer.

7. The conditions if any mentioned in certified Annexure-II issued by the Competent Authority, it shall be complied and compliances thereof shall be submitted to this office in time.

8. The Developer shall rehabilitate all the additional hutment dwellers if declared eligible in future by the competent Authority, after amending plans wherever necessary or as may be directed.

The Developer shall complete the rehab component of project within the stipulated time period from the date of issue of CC to 1®* rehab building as mentioned below Plot area up to 4000 sq.mt. —> 36 months.Plot area between 4001 to 7500 sq.mt. —> 60 months.Plot area more than 7500 sq.mt. — 72 months.

In case of failure to complete the project within stipulated time period the extension be obtained from the CEO/SRA with valid reasons.

10. The Developer/Chief Promoter shall register society of all eligible slum dwellers to be re-housed under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme before allotment of Rehab tenements or before execution of conveyance of land in favour of slum society, whichever is earlier. After finalizing the allotment of Project Affected Persons (PAP) by the Competent Authority they shall be accommodated as members of registered society.

11. The Developer, Architect shall submit the duly notarized Indemnity Bond on Rs.200/- non- judicial stamp papers indemnifying the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and its officers against any kind of dispute, accident on site, risks or any damages or claim arising out of any sort of litigation with the slum dwellers / property owners or any others before lOA in a prescribed format.

19. The Developer shall not block existing access/easement right leading to adjoining structures/users and shall make provision of adequate access to the adjoining land locked plot, if any, free of cost and the same shall be shown on

Dy.c r f C D A \ A C / C D A \ Engineer Stum RehabUitation Authorityb.u. ,h.K.A.)A.E.(S.R.A.) Slum Rchabilitrtion Auth y


layout plan to be submitted for approval on terms and conditions as may be decided by Slum Rehabilitation Authority.

20- The lOA/Building plans will be approved in accordance with the modified Development Control Regulations and prevailing rules, policies and conditions at the time of approval.

21. The Arithmetical error/ typographical error if any revealed at any time shall be corrected on either side.

22- That proper safety measures like barricading, safety net etc. shall be taken on site during construction work as maybe necessary depending upon the type of work and the developer along with their concerned technical team shall be solely responsible for safety.

23. That you shall pay Rs. 100/- per eligible slum dwellers towards issue of Identity Cards as per circular No. 137 dtd. 01.08.2012 before O.C.C. to Rehab Bldg./ Composite Bldg.

24. As per circular No. 138, that you shall deposit Rs. 10.00/-(Rupees Ten Only) per sq.feet of rehab constructed area inclusive of rehab component 8& staircase, lift passage, stilt area etc. for the Structural Audit before applying for Occupation Certificate of rehab building.

25. That you shall pay Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) for uploading the approval on website of Slum Rehabilitation Authority.

26. That the developer shall submit certificate of name reservation of society from A.R.S.(SRA).

27. That the FSI to the scheme shall be limited to 1.6625. Therefore, it is clarified that if Developer goes into profit' sharing ratio of 51:49 as per CRZ Crovi. notification dtd. 06/01/2011 then revised LOI with 3.00 FSI may be considered

issued subsequently.

28. The requirement of layout R.G. cannot be condoned Since layout of R.G. is for the use of resident of the layout, While Reservation R.G. is for the whole City. The layout R.G. shall be provided as per D.C.R. 1991 amended upto date.

29. High Rise Rehab Building :-

a. That you shall appoint Project Management Consultant with prior approval of Dy.Ch.E./E.E.(S.R.A.) for implementation / supervision / completion ofS.R. Scheme.

b. The Project Management Consultant appointed for the scheme shall submit quarterly progress report to Slum Rehabilitation Authority after issue of LOI

c. That the developer shall execute tri-partite Registered agreement between Developer, Society & Lift Supplying Co. or maintenance firm for


30.

comprehensive maintenance of the electro mechanical systems such as water pumps, lifts, etc. for a period of ten years from the date of issue of Occupation Certificate to the High-rise Rehab building.

Entire cost shall be borne by the developer and copy of the registered agreement shall be submitted to S.R.A for record before applying for Occupation Certificate including part O.C.

d. The Third Party Quality Auditor shall be appointed for the scheme with prior approval of Dy.Ch.E./E.E. (SRA) for quality audit of the building work at various stages of the S.R. Scheme.

e. That the developer shall install fire fighting system as per requirements of C.F.O. and to the satisfaction of this department. The developer shall execute tri-partite registered agreement between Developer, Society & Fire Fighting equipment supplying Co. and/or maintenance firms for comprehensive maintenance for a period of Ten years from the date of issue of occupation certificate to the High-rise Rehab building.

Entire maintenance cost shall be borne by the developer and copy of the Registered Agreement shall be submitted to S.R.A for record before applying for Occupation Certificate including part O.C.

f That the structural design of buildings having height more than 24m shall be got peer reviewed from another registered structural engineer / educational institute.

That you shall submit Layout and get the same approved before requesting for approval of building plans.


31. That you shall submit the separate P.R. Card for each subplot as required and till that time development shall be restricted to 75% of permissible built up area.

32. That the clarification from “Nehru Centre” authorities regarding built up premises to be handed over to them as per consent terms shall be submitted before approval of the said buildable reservation building or sale building in the scheme whichever is earlier.

33. That the concurrence of the “Appropriate Authority” for suitability of location, planning and design of the proposed 15% buildable reservation shall be obtained and submitted before asking approval of the said reservation building and/or proposed sale building in the scheme.

34. That you shall get plot boundaries demarcated and the compound wall shall be constructed prior to commencing building work and the same shall be certified by the concerned Architect before requesting for C.C. beyond the plinth C.C.

35. That you shall accommodate the huts getting cut along the boundary of the plot demarcated by the staff of the City Survey office.

36. That you shall submit the NOCs as applicable from the following concerned authority in the office of Slum Rehabilitation Authority before requesting of approval of plans or at a stage at which it is insisted upon by the concerned Executive Engineer (SRA)

5 Dy.' E x e c & Eng ineer Slum Reh«bllita«on Authority

S .E . (S.R.A.) A.E.{S.R.A.) ^ lu n i R e i^ i H t a t i o n .' /

i

(1) A.A.&C/G/S'Ward

(2) H.E.

(3) Tree Authority,

(4) Dy. Ch. Eng.(SWD) E.S./W.S./City

(5) Dy. Ch.E.(S.P.) (P & D)

(6) Dy.Ch.Eng. (Roads) E.S./W.S. /City

(7) P.C.O.

(8) B.S.E.S/Reliance Energy

(9) M.T.N.L. - Mumbai

37. That you shall submit the Indemnity Bond indemnifying the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and its officers against any damage or claim arising out of any sort of litigation with the slum dwellers / property owners or otherwise

38. That you shall obtain the permission for construction of the temporary transit accommodation from Slum Rehabilitation Authority along with the phased development programme and the list of the eligible slum dwellers shifted in the transit camp, with date of their displacement from their existing huts shall be submitted before asking C.C. for Rehab bldg.

39. That you as Architect / Developer'/ Society / PMC shall strictly observe that the work is carried out as per phased programme approved by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and you shall submit regularly progress report to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority along with photographs and certificate showing the progress of the construction work on site achieved as per approved phased programme. Even if the progress is nil, report shall be submitted bv the Architect stating reasons for delay.

40. That the tenements proposed for rehabilitation and for PAP shall be shown distinctly on the plan to be submitted and should be forwarded to A.A & C. I ‘G/S’ ward to assess the property tax.

41. That the possession of the residential tenements and shops shall not be handed over to the eligible hutment dwellers before the society is registered and transit accommodation given is surrendered and all the dues to the M.C.G.M has been cleared.

42. That you shall get D. P. Road/set back land demarcated from A. E (Survey)/D.P./ T 6& C department of M.C.G.M. and handed over to M.C.G.M free of cost and free of encumbrances by transferring the ownership in the name of M.C.G.M. duly developed as per Municipal specification and certificate to that effect shall be obtained and submitted before obtaining C.C. for the last 25% of sale built up area approved in the scheme.

43. That the lease agreement with land owning authority shall be executed before asking for occupation permission.

44. That the rehabilitation component of scheme shall include.


c l

a) 1026b) 01c) 04d) 10e) 10f) 10

Numbers of Residential tenements Numbers of Commercial tenements Numbers of R/C.Numbers of Balwadi Numbers of Welfare Centre Numbers of Society office

Amenity tenements to be handed over to Society and Society to use for specific purpose only.

45. That the layout Recreation Ground shall be duly developed before obtaining occupation of sale building.

46. That you shall pay development charges as per 124 E o f M.R. 8& T.P. Act separately for sale built up area as per provisions of M.R.& T.P. Act.

47. That you shall comply with the following conditions as per the circular issued by Asstt. Registrar (S.R.A.) dated 8/2/2010 at the time of allotment of Rehab Tenements / Galas.

i. After completion of rehab building; the rehab tenements/galas shall be allotted as per the policy circular of Slum Rehabilitation Authority in this regards.

ii. As per Circular No. 102, as all the eligible slum dwellers in the S.R. Scheme are issued identity cards at the time of allotment of rehab tenements/galas, the expenditure towards the preparation of Identity Cards shall be borne by developer.

iii. At the time of allotment of rehab tenement/gala, along with the identity card, the individual eligible slum dWeller shall also be handed over the PGSSESSIGN LETTER of the rehab tenement/gala.

48 That you shall display bilingual sign boards on site and painting of SRA Logo onrehab buildings as per Circular No. SRA/Admn/Circular No. 64/569/2004 dtd. 14/10/2004.

49. That the Developer shall submit NGC from MCZMA / MGEF for CRZ.

50. That this LGI superseded the earlier LGI issued under even on dated 6-12- 2004.

If applicant Society/Developer/Architect are agreeable to all these conditions, then may submit proposal for approval of plans separately for each building, in conformity with the modified D.C. Regulations of 1991 in the office of the undersigned within 90 days from receipt of this LGI.

Yours faithfully,

Chief Executive Gfficer Slum Rehabilitation Authority


'<? R A \ A C /C P A \ E jc ^ t iv e Engineer i Dy. Ch.. Rehabilitation Auth / S l u m RehablUtatlon Authority


Copy to:

1. Municipal Commissioner, MCGM.2. Collector Mumbai Suburban District.3. Assistant Commissioner, “G/S” Ward, M.C.G.M.4. Chief Engineer (Development Plan), M.C.G.M.5. Deputy Collector (SRA) - Copy for information to take further

necessary action as per circular no 376. H.E. of MCGM.7. I.T. Section (SRA), to publish this LOI on SRA website.

Chief Executive O ffic^ Slum Rehabilitation Authority

S.E.(S.R.A.)A.E.(S.R.A.) Engineer » 1 •Slum Rehabiiitatfon Authority Dy. Ch

Slum Rehabilitation Authority

SEPARATOR - sra.netcreativemind.co.insra.netcreativemind.co.in/upload/whatsnew/Constitution.pdf ·...

Documents

Transcript of SEPARATOR - sra.netcreativemind.co.insra.netcreativemind.co.in/upload/whatsnew/Constitution.pdf ·...