Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
Transcript of Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
1/230
Separation,Recovery,
and
Purification
inBiotechnology
Downloadedb
yUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
2/230
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
3/230
CS SYMPOSIUM SERIES 314
Separation,
Recovery,
and
Purification
inBiotechnology
RecentAdvancesand
Mathematical
Modeling
JuanA
Asenjo,
EDITOR
olumbia
University
Juan Hong,
EDITOR
Illinois
nstituteof
Technology
Developedfroma symposiumsponsoredby
theDivisionof
Microbial
andBiochemical
Technology
at the
190th
Meeting
of theAmerican ChemicalSociety,
Chicago,
Illinois,
September
8-13, 1985
Amer i can Chemica l Soc ie ty Wash ington D 1986
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
4/230
Library
of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Separation, recovery, and purification in
biotechnology.
(ACS symposiumseries,ISSN0097-6156;314)
Includes bibliographies and index.
1 BiotechnologyTechniqueCongresses.
2. BiomoleculesPurificationCongresses.
3. Biological chemistryTechniqueCongresses.
I. Asenjo,
Juan
., 1949- . II.Hong, Juan.
III.
American
Chemical Society. Meeting
(190th:
1985:
Chicago,
Ill.) IV. Series.
TP248.24.S47 1986 660 .6 028 86-10833
ISBN0 8412 0978 2
Copyright
1986
American
Chemical Society
Rights Reserved. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of each
chapter in this volume indicates the copyright owner s
consent
that reprographic
copies
of the
chapter may be made for personal or internal use or for the personal or internal use of specific
clients.
This
consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the statedper
copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 27 Congress Street, Salem,
MA01970,
for
copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
This
consentdoesnot extend to copying or transmission by any meansgraphic or electronicfor
any other purpose, such as for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes,
for creating a new collective work, for resale, or for informationstorageand retrievalsystems.
The
copying fee for each chapter is indicated in the code at the bottom of the firstpageof the
chapter.
The citation of trade names and/or names of manufacturers in this publication is not to be
construed as an endorsement or as approval by ACS of the commercial products orservices
referenced herein; nor should the mere reference herein to any drawing, specification, chemical
process, or other data be regarded as alicenseor as a conveyance of any right or permission,
to the holder, reader, or any other person or corporation, to manufacture, reproduce, use, or
sell any patented invention or copyrighted work that may in any way be related thereto.
Registered names, trademarks, etc., used in this publication,evenwithout specific indication
thereof, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
PRINTED
IN
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
American
Chemical
Society
Library
1155 16th St . N W
Washington D C 20036
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
5/230
ACSSymposiumSeries
M Joan Comstock,SeriesEditor
dvisory
Board
Harvey
W Bl an ch
University
of
CaliforniaBerkeley
A l a n
Elzerman
Clemson University
John W Fin l ey
Nabisco Brands,
Inc.
M a r ye Ann e Fox
The University
of
TexasAustin
M a r t i n L Gorb at y
Exxon Research and Engineering Co.
Rol an d F Hir sc h
U.S. Department
of
Energy
Rudol ph J Ma rc us
Consultant, Computers
Chemistry Research
Vincent D M cGi nn i ss
BattelleColumbus Laboratories
Donal d E M ore l and
USDA,Agricultural Research Service
W H No r t on
J
T. Baker Chemical Company
James C Ran da l l
Exxon Chemical Company
W D Shul t s
Oak
Ridge National Laboratory
Geoff rey K Smi t h
Rohm
Haas Co.
Charles S Tuesday
General Motors Research Laboratory
Dougl as B Walt ers
NationalInstitute of
Environmental Health
C Gra nt Wi l l son
IBM Research Department
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
6/230
F O R E W O R D
The ACS
S Y M P O S I U M S E RI ES
was
foun e
in 1974 to
provide
a
medium for publishing symposia quickly in book
form.
The
formatof the Series parallels that of the continuing
A D V A N C E S
IN C H E M I S T RY S E RIE S
exceptthat, in order to
save
time, the
papers are not
typeset
but are reproduced as they are submitted
by the authors in camera-readyform. Papers are reviewed under
the supervision of the Editors with the assistanceof the Series
Advisory
Boardand areselectedto maintain the integrity of the
symposia; however, verbatim reproductions of previously pub
lished papers are not accepted. Both reviews and reports of
research are acceptable, because symposia may embrace both
typesof presentation.
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
P
ublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.fw001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
7/230
P R E F C E
ONE
O F T H E M O S T D I FFI CU L T
and challenging problems facing large-scale
biotechnology today is to
find
and develop appropriate recovery, separation,
an d
purification processes. The area of large-scale bioseparations is one to
which biologists, physical biochemists, and particularly biochemical engi
neers have important contributions to make. Some of the most recent
advances and developments that have already started to
find
practical
applications are
membrane separations, including the use of membrane bioreactors
and
liquidemulsion membranes;
continuous or semicontinuous chromatographic separations,
includ
ing
the use of
a
number of affinity methods and monoclonal antibodies;
two-phase extraction
processes
such as aqueous
systems
and the use
of
reverse micelles;
precipitation techniques;
electrically driven separation processes;
methods of product secretion, cell permeation, disruption, and
selective
enzymatic lysis of
microbialcells
for
intracellular
product release;
product solubilization and renaturation of proteins or polysaccharides
present in inclusion bodies or granules.
This book covers several of the emerging areas of separations in
biotechnology and is not intended to be a comprehensive handbook. It
includes recent advances and
latest
developments in techniques and
operations used for bioproduct recovery in biotechnology and applied to
fermentation
systems
as well as mathematical analysis and modeling of such
operations. The topics have been arranged in three
sections
beginning with
product
release
from
the cell and recovery
from
the bioreactor.Thissection
is followed by one on broader separation and concentration processes, and
the
final
section is on purification operations. The operations covered in
these last two
sections
can be used at a number of differentst gesin the
downstream process.
crucial
question remaining is how to design aflowsheet or product
recovery operation sequence. Three main points to keep in
mind
are
1) integrating recovery with the fermentation system, 2) integrating the
different separation and purification
st ges
to design the optimum sequence,
an d
3)
assessing
the possibility of a continuous operation.
Revised versions of papers presented in the symposium upon which this
book
is based as well as papers presented in other
sessions
that were relevant
IX
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
PublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.pr001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
8/230
to the topic have been included in this volume. In addition we have included
a few keynote chapters on areas we felthad not been well covered at the
meeting.
We
gratefully acknowledge the
assistance
of many reviewers who helped
us with
critical
and constructive comments on the original manuscripts. We
wouldalso
like to acknowledge the support and well-organized help of the
staff at the C S Books Department.
J U N A. S E N J O
ColumbiaUniversity
NewYork NY10027
J U N H O N G
Illinois
Institute
of Technology
Chicago
IL
2 742
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
PublicationDate:July11,
1986|d
oi:10.1
021/bk-1986-0314.pr001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
9/230
1
ProteinReleasefromChemicallyPermeabilized
Escherichiacoli
David
J
Hettwer
and
Henry
Y Wang
Department
of
ChemicalEngineering,The University
of
Michigan,A nn Arbor,
M I48109-2136
n important factor complicating the recovery of
recombinant proteins from Escherichia
coli
is their
intracellular location. An alternative to the commonly
used method of releasing theseproteins by mechanical
disruption is to chemically permeabilize the cells. The
objective of this research was to characterize the pro
tein release
kinetics and mechanism of a permeabiliza-
tion
process
using guanidine-HCl and Triton-X100. The
protein release
kinetics were determined as a function
o
the guanidine
Triton
and
cell
concentrations.
Some
o
theadvantages over mechanical disruption include
avoidance of
extensive
fragmentation of the cells and
retention of the nucleic
acids
inside the
cell
structure.
T he r e c e n t d e v e l o p m e n t of r e c o mb i n a n t DNA t e c h n o l og y has made i t
f e a s i b l e
to
p r o d u c e
i n t e r f e r o n ,human g r o w t h hormone,
i n s u l i n ,
and
o th e r p r o t e i n s in the b a c t e r i u m E s c h e r i c h i a c o l i . An i m p o r t a n t
f a c t o r c o m pl i c a t i n g the r e c o v e r y p r oc e s s is the r e t e n t i o n of the
p r o t e i n
p r o d u c t i n s i d ethem i c r o b i a l c e l l . T h i shasn e c e s s i t a t e dthe
d e v e l o p m e n t of p r o c e s s e s c a p ab l e of r e l e a s i n g p r o t e i n f r o m E. c o l i .
P r o t e i n r e le a s e on an i n d u s t r i a l s c a le iscommonly a c h i e v e d by
m e c h a n i c a l l y b r e a k i n g the c e l l in a h i g h p r e s s u r e h o m o g e n i z e r or a
b a l l m i l l .
D i s r u p t i o n
in a
h i g h p r e s s u r e
h o m o g e n i z e r
is
c a u s e d
by
p r e s s u r e g r ad ie n t s e s t a b l i s h e dwhen a pr e s s u r i z e d c e l l s u s p e n s i o nis
f o r c e d t h r o u g hanarrow
o r i f i c e
whereas
w i t ha b a l l
m i l l
d i s r u p t i o n
i s c a u s e d by
s h e a r
f o r c e s
g e n e r a t e d
by g r i n d i n g the c e l l s w i t h
a b r a s i ve p a r t i c l e s (1.).
T h e s e
m e c h a n i c a l ly
b a s e d
p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
methods have
s e v e r a l
u n d e s i r a b le p r o p e r t i e s . One
p r o b l e m
ist h a t e x t e n s i v e
f r a g m e n t a t i o n
of the c e l l s
makes
the
s u b s e q u e n t
c e n t r i f u g a t i o n
d i f f i c u l t
( 2 , 3 ) .
A d d i n g
to the
p r o b l e m
of
c e l l f r a g m e n t r e m o va l
is theh i gh v i s c o s i t y
i m p a r t e d
to the s o l u t i o n by the r e l e a s e d n u c l e i c a c i d s (4). A
n u c l e i c
a c i d
r e m o v a l
s t e p is
n e c e s s a r y
to
d e c r e a s e
the s o l u t i o n
v i s c o s i t y and
a v o id p o t e n t i a l i n t e r f e r e n c e
w i t h f r a c t i o n a l
p r e c i p i t a t i o n and c h r o m a t o g r a p h y
(5.).
A n o t h e r
u n d e s i r a b l e p r o p e r t y
i s
t h a t
theh a r s h
a c t i o n
ofme c h a n i c a l
d i s r u p t i o n
c a u s e sthe
r e l e a s e
0097-6156/
86/
0314-0002 06.00/
0
1986American ChemicalSociety
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
10/230
1. H E T T W E R A N D
W A N G
ProteinReleasefrom hemically Permeabilized E
coli
3
o f n e a r l y a l lthes o l u b l e c e l l u l a r p r o t e i n . E x t e n s i v e p u r i f i c a t i o n
schemes are r e q u i r e d to i s o l a t e the
p r o d u c t f r om t h e s e e x t r a n e o u s
c e l l u l a r p r o t e i n s .
On e
a lt e r n a t i v e
tom e c h a n i c a l d i s r u p t i o n is to
t r e a t
the
c e l l s
w i t h
membrane
a c t i v e compounds
t h a t
can p e r m e a b i l i ze the c e l l to
p r o t e i n
wi t h o u t c a u s i n g e x t e n s i v e b r e a k ag e of the c e l l . The
o b j e c t i v eoft h i s
r e s e a r c h
was to
s t u dy
thep r o t e i n r e l e a s e k i n e t i c s
an d mechanismof a p e r m e a b i l i z a t i o n p r o c e s s u s i n g g u a n i di n e - H C land
T r i t o n - X l O O . G u a n i d i n e - H C l , a c h a o t r o p i c a g e n t , has been
d e m o n s t r a t e d to be c a p a b l e of
s o l u b i li z i n g
p r o t e i n f r o m E. c o l i
membrane
f r a g me n t s (6). P r e s u m a b l y ,
t h i s
o c c u r s v ia g u a n i d in e s
i n t e r a c t i o n
w i t h
w a t e r wh i c h
a l l o w s h y d r o p h o b i c g r o u ps tobecome
t h e r m o d y n a m i c a l l y more
s t a b l e
in anaqueousphase ( 7 ) . T r i t o n - X l O O ,
a n o n i o n i c de t e r g e n t
t h a thas a
h i g h b i n d i n g
a f f i n i t y
f o r h y d r o p h o b ic
s p e c i e s ,
i s v e r y e f f e c t i v e i n b i n d i n g to and s o l u b i l i z i n g
p h o s p h o l i p i d s
f r o m E. c o l i i n n e rmembraneand o u t e r w a l l f r a g m e n t s
( 8 ) .
Methods
C e l l
p r e p a r a t i o n .
E s c h e r i c h i a
c o l iK12,
s t r a i nW3110,
was
grown
i n a
14 l i t e r f e r m e n t e r at
3 7 C ,
pH 7.0 u s i n g d e f i n e d
media. A d d i t i o n a l
n i t r o g e nwas
s u p p l i e d
by NH OH
w h i c h
was a u t o m a t i c a l l y f e dtoc o n t r o l
t h epH. Thef e r m e n t a t i o n b r o t hwash a r v e s t e din thel a t e e x p o n e n t i a l
phase
andc o o l e dto4C . The
c e l l s
were i m m e d i a t e l y
c e n t r i f u g e d
at
4 C andwashed w i t h
b u f f e r
(.1M
T r i s
pH 7 . 0 ) . F o l l o w i n ga s e c o n d
c e n t r i f u g a t i o n , the
c e l l s
were r e s u s p e n d e d in
b u f f e r
tog i v ea d e n s e
c e l l
s u s p e n s i on
(^50 g
p r o t e i n / 1 ) .
C e l l p e r m e a b i l iz a t i o n .
The
p e r m e a b i l i za t i o n
p r o c e s swas s t a r t e dby
a d d i n g 30 ml of the c e l l s u s p e n s i onto 70 ml of a b u f f e r e d
s o l u t i o n
c o n t a i n i n g
g u a n i d i n e - H C l a n d / o r
T r i t o n
X100. The r e p o r t e d
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
of
T r i t o n ,
g u a n i d i n e , and
c e l l s
a lw ay s c o r r e s p o n dto
t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s a f t e r m i x i n g t h e s e s o l u t i o n s . The m i x t u r e was
s h a k e n
at 200 rpm in a 4C i n c u b a t o r . Samples were w i t h d r a w nat
v a r i o u s
t i m e sandwere i m m e d i a t e l y
c e n t r i f u g e d .
The s u p e r n a t a n twas
a s s a y e d to de t e r m i n e d the
r e l e a s e
of thev a r i o u s c e l l components.
A n a l y s i sof thep e l l e twasdonetop e r f o r mamass b a l a n c e .
A n a l y s i s of c e l l components. P r o t e i n was d e t e r m i n e d w i t h the
B r a d f o r d dye b i n d i n g as s a y u s i n g b ov i n e serum a l b u m i n as s t a n d a r d
( 9 ) . I n t e r f e r e n c eby T r i t o nX100 was a c c o u n t e d f o rby e n s u r i n g
t h a t
e v e r y
sample
had .2
T r i t o n .
In o r d e r to d e t e r m i n e theamountof
u n r e l e a s e d p r o t e i n
f r o m
thesample p e l l e t s ,
a l l
s a m p l e swere t r e a t e d
f o r 5m i n ut e s w i t hIN NaOH at1 0 0 C .
DNA was d e t e r m i n e d by thed i ph e n y l a mi n e
r e a c t i o n
( 1 0 ) . Two 45
m i n u t e
e x t r a c t i o n s
at7 C w i t h ,5NHCIO were u s e d to
r e l e a s e
DNA
f r o m the
sample p e l l e t s .
I n t e r f e r e n c e f r om g u an i d in ewas a c c o u n t e d
f o r bymaking
e a c h
sample.4M
g u a n i d i n e .
RNA was de t e r m i n e d by theo r c i n o l pr o c e d u r e ( 1 1 ) . Two 15
m i n u t e
e x t r a c t i o n s at7 C in ,5N
HC10
4
were
u s e d
tor e l e a s eRNA
f r o m
the
sample p e l le t s . I n t e r f e r e n c e f rom T r i t o nX100 was a c c o u n t e d f o rby
making e a c h sample1
T r i t o n .
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
11/230
4
SEPARATION
R EC O V ER Y A N D PURIFICATION IN B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
R e s u l t s and D i s c u s s i o n
F i g u r e 1
shows
t h e p r o t e i n , DNA, a nd RNA r e l e a s e
p r o f i l e s
o b t a i n e d
when
E .
c o l i
c e l l s a r e m e c h a n i c a l l y d i s r u p t e d
w i t h
.1 mm g l a s s
b e a d s .
The
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n
p r o f i l e
n o r m a l i z e d
t o t h e
i n i t i a l
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n , was o b t a i n e d w i t h a b a c t e r i a l c o u n t i n g
chamber.
The
d e c r e a s e
i n t h e c e l l c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d i c a t e s t h a t e x t e n s i v e
f r a g m e n t a t i o n o f t h e
c e l l s
i s o c c u r r i n g . A n e a r l y m i r r o r
image
r e l e a s e o f DNA, RNA, a nd p r o t e i n r e s u l t s a s c e l l u l a r
components s p i l l
o u t i n t o t he e x t r a c e l l u l a r f l u i d . T h e maximum p r o t e i n r e l e a s e ,
7 0 , i s p r o b a b l y i n d i c a t i v e o f a s i g n i f i c a n t
amount
o f c e l l u l a r
p r o t e i n b e i n g a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e membrane a nd w a l l f r a g m e n t s .
A s i m i l a r c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n f o r c e l l s t r e a t e d
w i t h
2M
g u a n i d i n e
an d 2 T r i t o n i s shown i n F i g u r e 2. T he p r o t e i n r e l e a s e ,
b a s e d
o n
t o t a l c e l l u l a r p r o t e i n , l e v e l s o f f a t 3 5 . RNA i s r e l e a s e d t o a
l e s s e r e x t e n t (^15 ) a nd v e r y l i t t l e D NA (^5 ) i s r e l e a s e d f r o m t h e
c e l l s .
T he c o n s t a n t
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d i c a t e s t h a t t he r e l e a s e i s
n o t t he r e s u l t o f
c e l l f r a g m e n t a t i o n .
From t h e s e
r e s u l t s , t h r e e
m a j o r
d i f f e r e n c e s
between c h e m i c a l
p e r m e a b i l i z a t i o n a nd
m e c h a n i c a l
d i s r u p t i o n c a n be
i d e n t i f i e d .
F i r s t
t he r e l e a s e o c c u r s b y
f u n d a m e n t a l l y
d i f f e r e n t
mechanisms.
W i t h
m e c h a n i c a l d i s r u p t i o n t he c e l l s a re e s s e n t i a l l y t o r n a p a r t ,
whereas
w i t h c h e m i c a l t r e a t m e n t
t h e
c e l l
s t r u c t u r e i s
s t i l l
p r e s e n t b u t h a s
been a l t e r e d t o a l l o w r e l e a s e o f
i n t r a c e l l u l a r
components. Se c o n d ,
t h e r e i s a n e a r l y
c o m p l e t e
p r e f e r e n t i a l r e l e a s e o f p r o t e i n
o v e r
DNA.
T h i r d ,
t h e r e i s a p a r t i a l s e l e c t i v e r e l e a s e o f p r o t e i n
o v e r
RNA.
T h i s
s e l e c t i v i t y
may r e s u l t
f r o m
a
m o l e c u l a r
s i e v i n g
mechanism.
The
a v e r a g e
p r o t e i n
m o l e c u l a r
w e i g h t
i s
40,000
whereas
t h e
c e l l u l a r
DNA
h a s a
m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t
o f 2 .5 1 0 ( 1 2 ) . T h e
m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t
d i s t r i b u t i o n
o f RNA; 18 i s
25,000,
2 7 i s
500,000,
a n d 5 5 i s
1,000,000 i s s u c h t h a t
most
o f t h e RNA i s a l s o
s i g n i f i c a n t l y
l a r g e r
t h a n
p r o t e i n s ( 1 2 ) .
T h e s e
d i f f e r e n c e s
s u g g e s t
s e v e r a l a d v a n t a g e s o f t h e
c h e m i c a l
p e r m e a b i l i z a t i o n method.
F i r s t
a v o i d i n g c e l l b r e a k a g e s h o u l d
s i m p l i f y t h e
c e l l r e m o v a l
s t e p . S e c o n d , r e t e n t i o n o f t he n u c l e i c
a c i d s i n s i d e t h e
c e l l
s h o u l d e l i m i n a t e t h e
n e e d
f o r a n u c l e i c a c i d
p r e c i p i t a t i o n s t e p . A n o t h e r a d v a n t a g e i s t h a t t he p e r m e a b i l i z a t i o n
p r o c e s s a l s o
k i l l s
t h e c e l l s t h e r e b y e l i m i n a t i n g th e n e e d f o r t h e
f e d e r a l l y mandated c e l l k i l l i n g
s t e p .
F i g u r e 2 showed t h a t 3 5 o f t h e t o t a l c e l l u l a r p r o t e i n i s
r e l e a s e d
upon
t r e a t i n g th e c e l l s w i t h 2M
g u a n i d i n e
a nd 2 T r i t o n . A
more
c o m p l e t e
d e s c r i p t i o n o f ;the e f f e c t o f v a r y i n g t h e
g u a n i d i n e
and
T r i t o n
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o n t h e
f i n a l amount
o f p r o t e i n r e l e a s e d i s
shown i n F i g u r e 3. Two s e t s o f e x t r a c t i o n s were c o n d u c t e d : one
c o n s i s t e d o f u s i n g 2 T r i t o n
w i t h
a r a n g e o f
g u a n i d i n e
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , t h e o t h e r c o n s i s t e d o f u s i n g 2M
g u a n i d i n e w i t h
a
r a n g e
o f T r i t o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s . T h e s e r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e
g u a n i d i n e - H C l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n i s t he more s e n s i t i v e p a r a m e t e r .
M a n i p u l a t i o n o f t h e
g u a n i d i n e
c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f 2
T r i t o n
l e a d t o r e l e a s e y i e l d s t h a t
r a n g e d f r o m
6 t o 6 0
whereas
v a r y i n g t he T r i t o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n
f r o m
0 t o 8 i n t h e
p r e s e n c e
of 2M
g u a n i d i n e
o n l y c h a n g e d t h e y i e l d f r o m 2 5 t o 4 0 .
T h e t i m e p r o f i l e s o f t h e 2M/2 , 2M, and 2 t r e a t m e n t s , shown i n
F i g u r e 4, i n d i c a t e a s y n e r g i s t i c e f f e c t
between g u a n i d i n e
and T r i t o n .
Th e p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
p r o f i l e
o f the 2M/2
t r e a t m e n t
i s n o t s i m p l y t h e
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
12/230
H E T T W E R A N D
W A N G
Protein Release from hemically Permeabilized E . coli
EXTENTOF RELEASE OF CELL COMPONENTS (* ),
CONCENTRATON OF UNDSRUPTED CELLS (
DNA
RNA
IJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
DSRUPTONTME (min.)
F i g u r e 1.
E x t e n t
of
c e l l b r e a k a g e
and
r e l e a s e
of c e l l u l a r
p r o t e i n , DNA, and RNA d u r i n g m e c h a n i c a l d i s r u p t i o n w i t h .1 mm
g l a s s b e a d s .
EXTENTOF RELEASE OF CELL COMPONENTS (* ),
CONCENTRATON OF UNOSRUPTFn fTLLS (*)
TME (hours)
F i g u r e 2. R e l e a s e of
c e l l u l a r
p r o t e i n , DNA, and RNA d u r i n g
t r e a t m e n t w i t h
2M
g u a n i d i n e
HC1and2 T r i t o nX100.
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
13/230
S E PA R A T I O N R E C O V E R Y A N D P U R IF IC A T I O N IN B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
FINAL PROTEN
RELEASE
(*)
( a l l 2 Tri tonX100)
^^^^Xall 2M GuanidineHC1)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TRITON X100 (* v/ v), GUANIDINE HC1 (M)
F i g u r e3. E f f e c tofT r i t o n X 1 0 0andg u a n i d i n eHC1ont h e p r o t e i n
r e l e a s e
y i e l d .
PROTEN
RELEASE (*)
0
2 / 2
-
-
2t1
GUANIDINEHC1
_
2* TRITON X100
1
Q
1 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6
TME hours)
F i g u r e
4
S y n e r g i s t i c e f f e c t
on the
p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
p r o f i l e
b e t w e e n
g u a n i d i n e
HC1an d T r i t o n X 1 0 0 .
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
14/230
1. H E T T W E R
A N D
W A N G
Protein Release from hemically Permeabilized E
coli 7
a d d i t i o nof thep r o f i l e s o b t a i n e d when2M
g u a n i d i n e
and 2 T r i t o nare
u s e d i n d i v i d u a l l y . Thea c c e l e r a t i o nof ther a t e of p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
by T r i t o nmay be r e l a t e dto thea b i l i t yofT r i t o ntos o l u b i l i ze
l i p i d
membranes.
Onew o u l d
a n t i c i p a t e t h a t
thec o m b i n a t i o nof 2M g u a n i d i n e
an d
2
T r i t o n a l t e r s
the E.
c o l i
i n n e rmembrane
and
o u t e r w a l l
to a
g r e a t e r e x t e n t
t h a n
e i t h e r i n d i v i d u a l
t r e a t m e n t , t h e r e b y pr o d u c i n ga
more p e r m e a b le
c e l l .
T he e f f e c t of v a r y i n g the
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n on the p r o t e i n
r e l e a s e
p r o f i l e
of 2M/2
t r e a t m e n t s
isshowninF i g u r e 5. The
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s are
e x p r e s s e d
int e r m sof thep r o t e i n c o n c e n t r a t i onof
t h e e x t r a c t i o n s o l u t i o n . A l t h o u g hno s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c twas
o b s e r v e d
on
the
r e l e a s e p r o f i l e
the
r e l e a s e y i e l d
d e c r e a s e d by a
f a c t o r
of
two
upon
i n c r e a s i n g
thec e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n f r o m
3.6 g/1 to 43.3 g/1.
T h e e x a c t
n a t u r e of ther e a s o n
f o r
thed e c r e a s e d
y i e l d
at
h i g h
c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
is notknown. However,
d e p l e t i o n
of the g u a n i d i n e
a n d / o r T r i t o n d ur i n g
thep r oc e s s is not
o c c u r r i n g ,
as e v i de n c e dby
t h e
f a c t
t h at t r e a t i n g c e l l s
a s e c o n d t i m e w i t h
f r e s h
g u a n i d i n eand
T r i t o n does
not i n d u c e
a d d i t i o n a l r e l e a s e ( d at a
notshown). If
d e p l e t i o n
of theg u a n i d i n e
a n d / o r T r i t o n
c a u s e d the
p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
t o
c e a s e , one w o u l d e x p e c t
t h a t
a s e c o n d t r e a t me n t w o u l d c a u s e
f u r t h e r
r e l e a s e
of
p r o t e i n
f r o m the
p a r t i a l l y a f f e c t e d
or as yet
u n a f f e c t e d
c e l l s .
hole Broth
r o t i n
Cone
PROTEIN
RELEASE * ) 3.6 g/ 1
12 5 g/ 1
27.4 g/ 1
43.3 g/ 1
TME hours)
F i g u r e
5.
E f f e c t
of c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n
on the
p r o t e i n r e l e a s e
p r o f i l e .
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
15/230
8
SEPARATION
R EC O V ER Y
A N D PURIFICATION IN
B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
C o n c l u s i o n s
E x p o s u r e of E. c o l i to
g u a n i d i n e - H Cl
and
T r i t o n - X l O O i n d u c e s
the
r e l e a s e of c e l l u l a r p r o t e i n s . The r e l e a s e r a t eand y i e l d were f o u n d
t o be d e p e n d e n t on the g u a n i d i n e , T r i t o n , and c e l l c o n c e n t r a t i o n s .
H i g h e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of g u a n i d i n e and T r i t o n and l o w e r c e l l
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s gave g r e a t e r r e l e a s e r a t e sandy i e l d s . G u a n i d i n e a l o n e
i s c a p a b l e of r e l e a s i n g a s i g n i f i c a n t
amount
of p r o t e i n . T r i t o n
r e l e a s e s a v e r y low
l e v e l
ofp r o t e i nbut s u b s t a n t i a l l y i n c r e a s e sthe
r a t e ofr e l e a s ewhen u s e d i nc o n j u n c t i o n w i t h g u a n i d i n e .
T h e
mechanism
of the
r e l e a s e ,
a
p e r m e a b i l i z a t i o n
of the c e l l i s
f u n d a m e n t a l l y
d i f f e r e n t f r o m m e c h a n i c a l
d i s r u p t i o n
w h i c h
i n v o l v e s
e x t e n s i v e f r a g m e n t a t i o n of the c e l l s . The a v o i d a n c e of e x t e n s i v e
c e l l b r e a k a g e s h o u l d s i m p l i f y the c e l l
r e m o v a l
s t e p and r e t e n t i o nof
t he n u c l e i c a c i d s i n s i d e the c e l l s h o u l d e l i m i n a t e the n e e d fo r a
n u c l e i c a c i d
p r e c i p i t a t i o n
s t e p . F u r t h e r m o r e , s i n c e the t r e a t m e n t
k i l l s the c e l l s a s e p a r a t e c e l l k i l l i n g s t e pmay be u n n e c e s s a r y .
Acknowledgment
We
w o u l d
l i k e to
acknowledge p a r t i a l
s u p p o r t
f r o m
the N a t i o n a l
S c i e n c e F o u n d a t i o n .
Literature Cited
1. Edebo, L. In Fermentation Advances ; Perlman, D., Ed.;
AcademicPress: NewYork, 1969; p. 249.
2.
Schutte,
H; Kroner, K. H.; Hustedt, H.; Kula, M. R. Enzyme
Microb. Technol. 1983, 5, 143.
3. Bucke, C. In Principles of Biotechnology ; Wiseman, ., Ed.;
Surrey University
Press:
New
York,
1983; p. 151.
4. Higgins, J. J.; Lewis, D. J.; Daly, W H.; Mosqueira, F. G.;
Dunnill, P.;
Lilly,
M. D. Biotech. Bioeng. 1978, 20, 159.
5. Wang, D. I. C.; Cooney, C. L.; Demain, .; Dunnill, P.;
Humphrey,
.;
Lilly,
M. In Fermentation and Enzyme
Technology ;
JohnWiley
Sons:
New
York,
1979; Chap. 12.
6. Moldow, C. J. MembraneBiol. 1972, 10, 137.
7. Hatefi, Y.; Hanstein, W In Methods in Enzymology ; Fleischer,
S.; Packer, L.; Eds.; Academic
Press:
New
York,
1974; p. 770.
8. Schnaitman, C. J.
Bact.
1971,
108(1),
545.
9. Bradford, M.
Anal.
Bioohem. 1976, 72, 248.
10. Burton, K. Biochem. J. 1956, 62, 315.
11. Herbert, D.; Phipps, P. J.; Strange, R. E. In Methods in
Microbiology ;
Norris, J. R.; Ribbons, D. W.; Eds.; Academic
Press: London, 1971; p. 210.
12. Brock, T. In Biology of Microorganisms ; Prentice-Hall:
Englewood Clifts, NewJersey, 1979; p. 131.
RECEIVEDMarch 26
1986
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch001
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
16/230
2
Structured
and SimpleModelsofEnzymatic Lysis and
DisruptionofYeast
Cells
J .
B.Hunterand J. A.
Asenjo
Biochemical
EngineeringLaboratory,Department
ofChemical
Engineering
andApplied
Chemistry,Columbia
University,NewYork, NY
10027
Microbial
cell-wall-lytic enzymes
are
widely
used
in the
laboratory
for
cell breakage, proto
-plasting
of
yeasts and bacteria, and
forstudies
of
the
structure and composition
of
microbial
cell
walls
1).
Recentlylytic
systems
have come
underconsideration
as a
specific and chemically
mildway
to
rupture microbial cells on an in
dustrial scale (2,3). There appear
to be
attrac
tive commercial applications
of
lytic
systems
for
the
recovery
of
enzymes, antigens and
other
recombinant products accumulatedwithin
cells,
for
upgrading
of
microbial biomass
for
food
and feed
uses 4,5)
and
for
the manufacture
of
functional
biopolymers from
cell
wall carbo
hydrates
6).
This
paper
presents
two models
of
enzymatic
lysis
of
yeast
cells;
a
simplified two-step model,
accountingfor
protein
releaseat
cell lysis
followed
by proteolysis, and
a
more complex mecha
nisticmodelwhichdescribes
the
removal
of the
two layers
of
theyeast
wall
and
the
extrusion
and rupture
of
the protoplast and organelles.
The
use of
these
models
in
predicting
the
release
and breakdown
of
microbial proteins, and
the ap-
plication
of the
structured model
to
enzyme
re-
coverywill also
be
discussed.
On e p r o b l e m i n p r o d u c t i o nof r e c o mb i n a n t p r o t e i n s i s r e c o v e r yof
t h e f i n i s h e d p r o d u c t f r o m t h e c e l l s w h i c h a c c u mu l a t e i t . T h i s
p r o b l e m i s
p a r t i c u l a r l y
a c u t e i n t h e c a s e
of
y e a s t s
andf u n g i ,
w h i c h
h a v e t o u g h , t h i c k
c e l l
w a l l s w h i c h a r e d i f f i c u l t t or u p t u r e me c h a n i
c a l l y
or by
s o n i c a t i o n . P r o d u c t s e c r e t i o n i s n o t a l w a y s f e a s i b l e ,
e v e n f o r l o w - mo l e c u l a r - w e i g h t p r o d u c t s , a l t h o u g ha n e wl y d e v e l o p e d
s e c r e t i o n p r o c e s s f o r y e a s t (7) a p p e a r s p r o mi s i n g .
0097-6156/
86/
0314-0009 06.50/
0
1986
American Chemical
Society
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
17/230
10
SEPARATION, R E C O V E R Y , A N D
PURIFICATION
IN
B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
T h e r e a r e n u me r o u s
e x a mp l e s
o f o v e r p r o d u c e d r e c o mb i n a n t p r o t e i n s
w h i c h
p r e c i p i t a t e
i n t r a c e l l u l a r l y
i n E_. c o l i , f o r mi n g d e n s e i n c l u s i o n
b o d i e s ( 8 ) ; t h e s e p r o d u c t s i n c l u d e
i n s u l i n
a n d s o ma t o s t a t i n , b o t h
v e r y s ma l l p r o t e i n s . I n y e a s t ,
r e c o mb i n a n t
v i r a l s u r f a c e a n t i g e n
p r o t e i n s a r e n o t s e c r e t e d , b u t
a s s e mb l e
i n t o p a r t i c l e s ( 9 ) .
S u b
c e l l u l a r
s t r u c t u r e s s u c h a s mi t o c h o n d r i a , l y s o s o me s o r t h e v a c u o l e
mu s t
a l s o b e r e c o v e r e d b y c e l l
b r e a k a g e ,
f o r u s e e i t h e r a s b i o -
c a t a l y s t s ( 1 0 ) o r a s a n i n i t i a l s t e p i n t h e p u r i f i c a t i o n o f e n z y me s
a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s u c h s t r u c t u r e s .
U n t i l
n o w, t h e s e p r o d u c t s h a v e
g e n
e r a l l y b e e n h a r v e s t e d b y me c h a n i c a l l y r u p t u r i n g t h e c e l l s i n a
h o mo g e n i z e r ,
b e a d
m i l l
o r F r e n c h p r e s s . T h e h i g h s h e a r
f i e l d s ,
e l e
v a t e d t e mp e r a t u r e s a nd g a s - l i q u i d
i n t e r f a c e s
g e n e r a t e d i n t h e s e
d e v i c e s c a n d e n a t u r e p r o t e i n s , e s p e c i a l l y mu l t i - e n z y me c o mp l e x e s
a n d me mb r a n e - l i n k e d p r o t e i n s ( 1 1 ) . Mo r e o v e r , t h e s e p a r a t i o n
o f c e l l d e b r i s
f r o m
t h e p r o d u c t s i s e s p e c i a l l y c o mp l i c a t e d i f t h e
p r o d u c t i s p a r t i c u l a t e ,
f r a g i l e
o r me mb r a n e - a s s o c i a t e d .
L y t i c e n z y me s y s t e ms p r o v i d e a c h e mi c a l l y m i l d , l o w- s h e a r
a n d c a t a l y t i c a l l y s p e c i f i c a l t e r n a t i v e t o me c h a n i c a l c e l l d i s
r u p t i o n . De p e n d i n g
o n t h e p a r t i c u l a r
l y t i c s y s t e m e mp l o y e d
a n d
i t s
p u r i t y , t h e
e n z y me s
ma y b e e n g i n e e r e d t o a t t a c k c e l l
w a l l
c o m
p o n e n t s a l o n e , w i t h o u t p r o d u c t d a ma g e . T h e e n z y me l y s o z y me ,
a c t i v e
a g a i n s t
some b a c t e r i a l c e l l w a l l s , h a s b e e n u s e d t o h a r v e s t b o v i n e
g r o w t h h o r mo n e g r a n u l e s f r o m _ E.
c o l i
( 8 ) , a n d a me mb r a n e - a s s o c i a t e d
h y d r o x y l a s e c o mp l e x
f r o m
P . p u t i d a ( 1 1 ) ; u s e o f o t h e r b a c t e r i o
l y t i c e n z y me s
f r o m
a v a r i e t y o f mi c r o b i a l s o u r c e s h a v e a l s o b e e n
r e p o r t e d
( 3 ) .
I n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n t o
t h e s u b c e l l u l a r l o c a t i o n o f
e n z y me a c t i v i
t i e s
i n mi c r o b i a l
c e l l s
s u g g e s t t h a t o n e o r mo r e e n z y me p r o d u c t s
c o u l d
b e
s p e c i f i c a l l y f r a c t i o n a t e d f r o m
a s i n g l e b a t c h o f c e l l s
b y p r o p e r l y c o n t r o l l i n g c e l l d i s r u p t i o n . I n v e r t a s e i n y e a s t i s
p o s s i b l y
t h e b e s t e x a mp l e o f t h i s p r i n c i p l e . T h e s t u d i e s l e a d i n g
t o d i s c o v e r y o f i t s l o c a t i o n ( i n t h e p e r i p l a s mi c
s p a c e ) h a v e
b e e n s u mma r i z e d b y P h a f f ( 1 2 ; p . 1 7 1 - 1 7 3 ) , a n d a s a mp l e p r o c e s s f o r
i t s r e c o v e r y h a s b e e n
p r o p o s e d
( 4 ) . T h e r e c o v e r y o f s e v e r a l
d i f
f e r e n t e n z y me s i n h i g h y i e l d a n d h i g h r e l a t i v e p u r i t y s h o u l d b e
p o s s i b l e
u s i n g a c o mb i n a t i o n o f
l y t i c
e n z y me s , s u r f a c t a n t s a n d o s
mo t i c s u p p o r t b u f f e r s t o
s e l e c t i v e l y
a n d s e q u e n t i a l l y r e l e a s e p r o
t e i n s
f r o m p a r t i c u l a r
s t r u c t u r e s .
C e l l
f r a c t i o n a t i o n
b y me c h a n i c a l r u p t u r e h a s a l r e a d y
come
u n d e r
i n v e s t i g a t i o n . Two s e p a r a t e s t u d i e s o f me c h a n i c a l r u p t u r e o f y e a s t
s h o w e d
d i f f e r e n t r a t e s o f r e l e a s e f o r
e n z y me s
i n d i f f e r e n t c e l l
l o c a t i o n s ( 1 3 , 1 4 ) . W a l l - l i n k e d a n d p e r i p l a s mi c e n z y me s
w e r e
r e
l e a s e d r e l a t i v e l y
f a s t e r t h a n t o t a l p r o t e i n , s o l u b l e c y t o p l a s mi c
e n z y me s a t a b o u t t h e s a me r a t e , a n d t h e mi t o c h o n d r i a l e n z y me f u ma r a s e
l a t e r
t h a n t o t a l p r o t e i n ( 1 3 ) . P r o t e o l y s i s b y t h e y e a s t
1
s own
e n z y me s wa s n o t f o u n d t o b e a p r o b l e m.
A c t i v i t i e s
o f t h e r e l e a s e d
e n z y me s d e c l i n e d s l o w l y o r n o t a t a l l w h e n d i s r u p t i o n wa s c o n
t i n u e d a f t e r t h e e n d o f p r o t e i n r e l e a s e , a n d t h e e f f e c t o f s h e a r wa s
n o t s e p a r a t e d f r o m t h e
e f f e c t
o f p r o t e o l y s i s . S h e t t y a nd K i n s e l l a
( 1 5 ) a l s o f o u n d a l o w r a t e o f
p r o t e o l y s i s a f t e r
me c h a n i c a l
d i s r u p t i o n ,
t h o u g h
t h i o l
r e a g e n t s a d d e d t o we a k e n t h e c e l l w a l l s b e f o r e
d i s r u
p t i o n
c a u s e d
a n i mp o r t a n t i n c r e a s e i n t h e e x t e n t o f p r o t e i n b r e a k
d o w n .
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
18/230
2. H U N T E R A N D ASENJO Enzymatic Lysis and Disruption of east ells
11
M o d e l B a c k g r o u n d
Y e a s t
c e l l
s t r u c t u r e . The e x t e n s i v e b o d y of l i t e r a t u r e on
c e l l
w a l l c o mp o s i t i o n
and
s t r u c t u r e h a s r e c e n t l y b e e n r e v i e we d
by
B a l l o u
( 1 6 ) and
e a r l i e r
by P h a f f ( 1 2 ) .
A s an e n g i n e e r i n g a p p r o x i ma t i o n , t h e
c e l l
w a l l of y e a s t may be
c o n s i d e r e d
as a t w o - l a y e r s t r u c t u r e . ( F i g u r e 1) The i n n e r w a l l i s
c o mp o s e d of a
mi x t u r e
of
b r a n c h e d 3 ( 1 - 3 )
and
3 ( 1 - 6 ) l i n k e d g l u c a n s ,
g l u c o s e p o l y me r s s i m i l a r t oc e l l u l o s e ( 1 2 ) . Theo u t s i d e o f t he
g l u c a n l a y e r i s c o v e r e d w i t h a ma n n a n - p r o t e i n
c o mp l e x
c o n s i s t i n g
o f
a
c r o s s - l i n k e d
n e t w o r k of
p r o t e i n
mo l e c u l e s , t ow h i c h a r e a t
t a c h e d
t wo
t y p e s
ofma n n a n : ana c i d i c
o l i g o s a c c h a r i d e ,
and a
h i g h e r
mo l e c u l a r we i g h t p h o s p h o ma n n a n h a v i n g a d . p . ofa b o u t 100 ( 1 7 ) .
F r o m
t h e p e r s p e c t i v e of
c e l l l y s i s ,
t h i s ma n n o p r o t e i n l a y e r s e r v e s
t o
p r o t e c t t h e g l u c a n s f r o m h y d r o l y t i c e n z y me s ( 1 8 , 1 9 , 2 0 ) . W i t h i n
t h e t wow a l l
l a y e r s
i s t h e p r o t o p l a s t , c o mp r i s e d of a p l a s ma mem
b r a n e e n c l o s i n g t h e c y t o s o l
and
t h e s u b c e l l u l a r s t r u c t u r e s .
E n z y me s of t h e
l y t i c
s y s t e m. M i c r o b i a l y e a s t - l y t i c
e n z y me
s y s t e ms a r e w i d e l y d i s t r i b u t e d i n n a t u r e ,
and
h a v e b e e n
i s o l a t e d
f r o m
R h i z o c t o n i a s p . , ( 4 ) , B a c i l u s c i r c u l a n s ( 2 1 ) , C o p r i n u s ma c r o r h i z u s
( 2 2 ) ,
andC y t o p h a g a s p . ( 2 3 ) , a m o n g o t h e r s o u r c e s .
C r u d e
y e a s t
l y t i c
e n z y me s y s t e ms c o mp r i s e s e v e r a l h y d r o l y t i c
a c t i v i t i e s , o f t e n i n c l u d i n g c h i t i n a s e , ma n n a n a s e , and av a r i e t yof
p r o t e a s e s andg l u c a n a s e s ( 1 ) . O n l y t wo of t h e s e a c t i v i t i e s , a
l y t i c
p r o t e a s e
and a
l y t i c g l u c a n a s e , a r e e s s e n t i a l f o r
l y s i s
( 1 9 , 2 4 , 2 0 ) .
L y t i c g l u c a n a s e s
u s u a l l y
b i n d p r e f e r e n t i a l l y t o l o n g c h a i n s of 3 ( 1 - 3 )
g l y c o s i d i c
l i n k a g e s , s u c h
as
t h o s e f o u n d i n
m i c r o f i b r i l l a r
y e a s t
w a l l
g l u c a n .
I ng e n e r a l , t h e
l y t i c
g l u c a n a s e s h a v e an e n d o -
a c t i o n
p a t t e r n b u t some a t t a c k e x o - w i s e ,
r e l e a s i n g
o l i g o s a c c h a r i d e s
of
5 g l u c o s e
u n i t s
f r o m t h e s t r u c t u r a l y e a s t g l u c a n . O t h e r g l u c a n a s e s ,
w i t h
d i f f e r e n t
s u b s t r a t e s p e c i f i c i t y and
a c t i o n
p a t t e r n s , a r e
u s u a l l y
p r e s e n t i n t h e
l y t i c
s y s t e m a n d a c t s y n e r g i s t i c a l l y t o d e g r a d e
i n s o l u b l e y e a s t g l u c a n t og l u c o s e andd i s a c c h a r i d e s ( 2 5 ) . L y t i c
p r o t e a s e s h a v e
ac h a r a c t e r i s t i c
h i g h
a f f i n i t y
f o r t h e y e a s t w a l l s u r
f a c e , ando f t e n h a v e a n o ma l o u s l y l o w a c t i v i t i e s a g a i n s t c o n v e n t i o n a l
p r o t e i n
s u b s t r a t e s . T h e i r
r o l e
i n l y s i s of v i a b l e y e a s t c e l l s
c a n n o t be
s u b s t i t u t e d
by o r d i n a r y p r o t e a s e s . ( 2 0 , 2 6 ) .
W
u s e d
a
l y t i c
s y s t e m f r o m O e r s k o v i a
x a n t h i n e o l y t i c a
L L - G1 0 9
f r o m t h e c o l l e c t i o n of M L e c h e v a l i e r ,atR u t g e r s U n i v e r s i t y .
F i l t e r e d c u l t u r e b r o t h
was
u s e d
as
t h e e n z y me s o u r c e . D e t a i l s
of
t h e e n z y me p r o d u c t i o n a r e g i v e n e l s e wh e r e ( 2 7 , 2 8 ) . The l y t i c a c
t i v i t y
of t h e O e r s k o v i a s y s t e m i s due t o a
l y t i c
p r o t e a s e and an
e n d o 3 ( 1 , 3 ) g l u c a n a s e ( 2 0 ) ,
p o s s i b l y
s u p p l e me n t e d w i t h an e x o 3 ( 1 - 3 )
g l u c a n a s e
r e mo v i n g
a 5 - s u g a r u n i t f r o m t h e c h a i n ( 2 9 ) .
S e q u e n c e of c e l l l y s i s . E n z y ma t i c c e l l
l y s i s
b e g i n s w i t h b i n d
i n g
of t h e
l y t i c
p r o t e a s e t o t h e o u t e r ma n n o p r o t e i n l a y e r of t he
w a l l . Thep r o t e a s e o p e n s up t h e
p r o t e i n
s t r u c t u r e , r e l e a s i n g w a l l
p r o t e i n s
a n d
ma n n a n s , and
e x p o s i n g t h e g l u c a n s u r f a c e
b e l o w
( F i g u r e
2 ) . N e x t , t h e g l u c a n a s e a t t a c k s t h e i n n e r w a l l ands o l u b i l i z e s t h e
g l u c a n ( 1 9 ) . Whent h e
c o mb i n e d a c t i o n
ofp r o t e a s e and g l u c a n a s e
h a s o p e n e d as u f f i c i e n t l y l a r g e h o l e i n t h e
c e l l
w a l l , t h e p l a s ma
me mb r a n e
andi t s c o n t e n t s a r e e x t r u d e d as a p r o t o p l a s t ( 1 ) . I n
o s m o t i c a l l y s u p p o r t e d b u f f e r s c o n t a i n i n g
. 55 t o 1. 2M
s u c r o s e
or
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
19/230
12
S E PA R A T I O N , R E C O V ER Y , A N D P UR I FI C A T I O N IN B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
Mannoprotein Units
ell
Membrane Structural Glucan Units
F i g u r e 1 D o u b l e - l a y e r e d
s t r u c t u r e
of
t h e
y e a s t w a l l , e n c l o s i n g
t h e c e l l me mb r a n e
F i g u r e 2 S c h e ma t i c
of l y s i n g y e a s t c e l l
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
20/230
2.
H U N T E R N D ASENJO Enzymatic Lysis and Disruption of east ells
13
m a n n i t o l , t h e p r o t o p l a s t r e ma i n s i n t a c t b u t i n d i l u t e b u f f e r s i t l y -
s e s
i mme d i a t e l y ,
r e l e a s i n g c y t o p l a s m i c p r o t e i n s
and
t h e o r g a n e l l e s
w h i c h may t h e ms e l v e s
l y s e .
Me a n wh i l e ,
p r o t e i n s r e l e a s e d
f r o m
t h e w a l l
and
t h e
c y t o p l a s m
a r e
s u b j e c t
t o
a t t a c k
by
p r o d u c t - d e g r a d i n g p r o t e a s e
c o n t a mi n a n t s
i n t h e
l y t i c s y s t e m
( 2 8 , 3 0 ) .
Mo d e l s
Ma t h e ma t i c a l mo d e l s w i t h d i f f e r e n t l e v e l s
of
s t r u c t u r e a r e
u s e
f u l
f o r t h e
d e s i g n of
r e a c t o r s ,
t o
c a r r y o u t s i m u l a t i o n s t u d i e s , f o r
p r o c e s s
o p t i m i z a t i o n
and
f o r i n c r e a s i n g o u r
u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t he
m e c h a n i s t i c , b i o l o g i c a l
b e h a v i o r of
b i o c h e m i c a l
s y s t e ms .
H i s t o r i c a l l y
t h e r e h a s b e e n
l i t t l e
p u b l i s h e d
w o r k on
mo d e l s
of
m i c r o b i a l c e l l l y s i s . Themo d e l s
p r o p o s e d
f o r o v e r a l l c e l l
l y s i s
h a v e b e e n e l e me n t a r y and
t h e i r a p p l i c a t i o n h a s
b e e n
l i m i t e d .
F i r s t -
o r d e r
a n d
Mi c h a e l i s - M e n t e n mo d e l s h a v e b e e n
u s e d
t oe s t i ma t e
t h e
p e r f o r ma n c e
of a
s a mp l e
l y s i s p r o c e s s
( 2
S
3 ) , L y s i s
of
f r e e z e - d r i e d
Mi c r o c o c c u s
l y s o d e i k t i c u s c e l l s
by
l y s o z y me
was
mo d e l e d w i t h
a
s e c o n d - o r d e r
r a t e e x p r e s s i o n ( 3 1 ) .
At
t h e
o t h e r e nd of
t h e
s p e c t r u m
o f
ma t h e ma t i c a l c o mp l e x i t y
i s
a mo d e l of l y s o z y me - c a t a l y z e d d e g r a d a
t i o n of
s o l u b l e b a c t e r i a l
c e l l - w a l l
o l i g o s a c c h a r i d e s , f o c u s i n g
on
t h e
d e g r e e
of
p o l y m e r i z a t i o n
of
t h e s u b s t r a t e
and
t h e b i n d i n g m o d e s
of
e n z y me t os u b s t r a t e s ( 3 2 ) .
A c c o u n t i n g
f o r onee n z y me and c a r b o h y
d r a t e
o l i g o me r s up t o
d . p .
9,
i t h a s
n i n e d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n sand
t e n
p a r a me t e r s ,
a n d
was
t e s t e d
on
p u r i f i e d r a d i o l a b e l e d o l i g o s a c c h a
r i d e s .
A l t h o u g h
u s e f u l f o r e l u c i d a t i n g e n z y me a c t i o n p a t t e r n s ,
s u c h
mo d e l s
a r e t o o d e t a i l e d
t o be
r e a d i l y a p p l i e d
t o a
mu l t i - e n z y me ,
m u l t i - s u b s t r a t e
s y s t e m.
T h e
t womo d e l s ofy e a s t
l y s i s
p r e s e n t e d h e r e h a v e b e e n
d e v e l o p
e d
t os e r v e t wo
d i f f e r e n t
p u r p o s e s . The s i mp l e mo d e l
i s
a l u mp e d ,
t w o - s t e p mo d e l w h i c h
f o l l o w s t h e
ma j o r
f e a t u r e s
of
t h e
d a t a
a n d
may
p r o v e
u s e f u l f o r d e s i g n
of l y s i s
r e a c t o r s .
The
s t r u c t u r e d mo d e l ,
w h i c h
c a n a c c o u n t f o r t h e
s o u r c e
of p r o t e i n w i t h i n t h e c e l l , was
d e v e l o p e d t o
g a i n
a me c h a n i s t i c
b a s i s f o r p r e d i c t i n g t h e e f f e c t s
of
u n t e s t e d p r o c e s s
c o n d i t i o n s ,
and t o
a i d i n s i g h t i n t o t h e p h y s i c a l
p r o c e s s e s a two r k
d u r i n g
l y s i s .
S i mp l e
mo d e l .
The
s i mp l e
mo d e l
was
b u i l t
f o r
c o mp a c t
d e s c r i p t
i o n
of
t h e
d a t a
i n
a
p r e - d e t e r mi n e d r a n g e
ofy e a s t and
e n z y me c o n c e n
t r a t i o n s .
I t t r e a t s c e l l
l y s i s and
p r o t e o l y s i s
as
s i n g l e - s t e p
r e a c t i o n s i n s e q u e n c e . B o t h r e a c t i o n s a r e mo d e l e d w i t h M i c h a e l i s -
Me n t e n
k i n e t i c s , e v e n
t h o u g h
y e a s t , t h e s u b s t r a t e
of
t h e
f i r s t
r e a c t i o n ,
i s p a r t i c u l a t e
and
t h e p r o t e i n s a r e s o l u b l e .
The
d i f f e r e n t
e n z y me s
of
t h e l y t i c s y s t e m a r e g r o u p e d t o g e t h e r i n t o
ana l l - i n c l u
s i v e s i n g l e e n z y me ,
E,
b e a r i n g b o t h t h e p r o t e o l y t i c a n d y e a s t - l y t i c
a c t i v i t i e s .
A l l
of
t h e
c e l l
s t r u c t u r e s a r e a l s o c o n s i d e r e d
t o g e t h e r
a s
a
u n i f i e d
y e a s t c e l l ma s s , Y.
When ac e l l
i s a t t a c k e d
by e n z y me s
i t i s
p r e s u me d t o
d i s s o l v e
i n s t a n t a n e o u s l y , r e l e a s i n g i t s e n t i r e
ma s s
as
s o l u b l e p r o t e i n s ,
p e p
t i d e s
andc a r b o h y d r a t e s . Thea s s u mp t i o n of i n s t a n t a n e o u s
s o l u t i o n
o f t h e c e l l ma s s c o n s t r a i n s t h e mo d e l f o r u s e
w h e r e
t h e
l y s i s
me d i u m
i s h y p o - o s mo t i c and
p r o t o p l a s t s c a n n o t s u r v i v e i n t a c t .
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
21/230
14
SEPARATI ON, RECOVERY, A ND P UR I F I C AT I ON I N
BI OTECHNOLOGY
On l y
t wo
i n d e p e n d e n t
v a r i a b l e s a r e u s e d : y e a s t ( Y ) a n d e n z y me
E ) ;
t h e me a s u r e d v a r i a b l e s a r e y e a s t , T C A - i n s o l u b l e p r o t e i n ( ) ,
T C A - s o l u b l e p r o t e i n ( p e p t i d e s , S ) ,
a n d
c a r b o h y d r a t e s
( C ) ;
a l l
a r e
e x p r e s s e d
a s g / 1 d r y
b a s i s . Enz yme c o n c e n t r a t i o n
wa s
e x p r e s s e d
a s
t h e
v o l u me p e r
c e n t
o f c r u d e l y t i c
e n z y me
p r e p a r a t i o n
a d d e d t o t h e
r e a c t i o n mi x t u r e .
P r o t e o l y t i c
a n d o t h e r c a u s e s f o r l y t i c e n z y me
d e a c t i v a t i o n
( e . g . ,
t h e r ma l ) h a v e b e e n a s s u me d t o b e
n e g l i g i b l e
( 2 8 ) ,
d Y
d t
=
- k
a
( Y - Y
d P _ d Y
>
d t
f
p y
d t ,
d S _
- f
d Y /
d t
s y
d t ,
d C _
d t
~ f c y
d Y '
. d t ,
k
r
E
( Y
Y c o )
( Y -
Y c o )
+
k E - P
+ s +
m
P 1+
k
_ J 2
Y *
+ S + K
mp
1 +
-
1 )
( 2 )
3 )
4 )
V a r i a b l e names a n d p a r a me t e r v a l u e s a r e g i v e n i n T a b l e I .
On t h e
r i g h t - h a n d s i d e
o f
e q u a t i o n
1 , t h e
i n i t i a l
t e r m
r e p r e
s e n t s a u t o l y s i s
a n d t h e
s e c o n d
t e r m, e n z y ma t i c l y s i s .
E q u a t i o n
2
d e s c r i b e s p r o t e i n b r e a k d o wn b y p r o d u c t - d e g r a d i n g p r o t e a s e s . T h e
f i r s t
t e r m
o n t h e
r i g h t
s i d e s t a n d s
f o r t h e
p r o t e i n r e l e a s e d
f r o m
l y s i n g c e l l s , a n d t h e s e c o n d t e r m, b r e a k d o wn o f t h e
p r o t e i n a l r e a d y
i n s o l u t i o n . E q u a t i o n
3 s h o ws
t h a t p e p t i d e s
a r e
r e l e a s e d
f r o m
l y s i n g
y e a s t ,
b u t
a l s o a r i s e
f r o m b r e a k d o wn o f
l o n g e r p r o t e i n s ,
P .
S i n c e t h e p r o t e a s e a c t i v i t y a g a i n s t s o l u b l e p r o t e i n s i s
c o n
s i d e r e d
n o n - s p e c i f i c , b o t h l o n g -
a n d
s h o r t - c h a i n p r o t e i n s
w i l l b e
a t t a c k e d
b y t h e e n z y me
w i t h
e s s e n t i a l l y t h e
same
a f f i n i t y p e r g r a m
o f s u b s t r a t e .
He n c e , S w i l l a c t a s a
c o mp e t i t i v e i n h i b i t o r
o f t h e
e n z y me a c t i v i t y a g a i n s t P , wh e r e t h e i n h i b i t i o n c o n s t a n t i s e q u a l
t o
t h e M i c h a e l i s c o n s t a n t K ^ . C a r b o h y d r a t e r e l e a s e i s s h o wn i n
e q u a t i o n
4 .
P a r a me t e r s
f o r
t h e
s i mp l e
mo d e l we r e
d e t e r mi n e d
g r a p h i c a l l y
b y
E a d i e - H o f s t e e p l o t t i n g o f
i n i t i a l
r e a c t i o n r a t e s a n d s u b s t r a t e
c o n
c e n t r a t i o n s .
D e t a i l s
a r e
g i v e n
e l s e w h e r e 3 0 ) . A s h a s b e e n o b
s e r v e d
i n
h y d r o l y s i s
o f
o t h e r s o l i d s u b s t r a t e s ,
a
r e s i d u e
o f n o n -
l y s e d
s u b s t r a t e
wa s f o u n d a t e x t e n d e d
r e a c t i o n t i me s , when
d Y / d t
t e n d e d t o wa r d
z e r o . T h e e x t e n t o f r e a c t i o n wa s s t r o n g l y d e p e n d e n t
o n
i n i t i a l
s u b s t r a t e a n d e n z y me c o n c e n t r a t i o n s 33 , 34 ). A n
e m p i r i c a l
f u n c i t o n
f o r Y ^ wa s f i t t e d t o t h e
u l t i ma t e t u r b i d i t y d a t a
f o r
l y s i s r u n s a t a
v a r i e t y
o f
i n i t i a l y e a s t
a n d e n z y me
c o n c e n
t r a t i o n s u s i n g
a
l e a s t
s q u a r e s me t h o d . T h e
c a l c u l a t e d v a l u e s
f o r
Yoo we r e u s e d i n t h e s i mu l a t i o n s 3 0 ) . F i g u r e 3 s h o ws
r e s u l t s
o f
t h e s i mp l e
mo d e l .
S t r u c t u r e d mo d e l .
T h i s
mo d e l
c o n s i d e r s
l y s i s o f t h e c e l l f r o m
t h e v i e wp o i n t
o f
p r o g r e s s i v e
b r e a k d o wn o f t h e c e l l
s t r u c t u r e s ,
s t a r t i n g
f r o m
t h e o u t e r w a l l l a y e r a n d p r o g r e s s i n g t o t h e s u b c e l l u l a r
s t r u c t u r e s i n s i d e t h e p r o t o p l a s t 3 5 ) . H e r e t h e c e l l i s d i v i d e d
i n t o
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
22/230
2. H U N T E R A N D ASENJO Enzymatic Lysis and Disruption of
Yeast
Cells
15
T a b l e
L.
L u mp e d mo d e l
v a r i a b l e s
a nd p a r a me t e r s
V a r i a b l e s -
S i mp l e Mo d e l
Y
Y e a s t , mg/ 1
Y
0
O r i g i n a l
y e a s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n
Yoo
U l t i ma t e y e a s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n ,
mg/ 1 ;
p r o p o r t i o n a l
t o r e s i d u a l t u r b i d i t y .
^= a 4 bE +c Y
0
+I
P r o t e i n
( T C A - i n s o l u b l e ) ,
mg/ 1
S
P e p t i d e s ( T C A - s o l u b l e ) ,
mg/ 1
C Ca r b o h y d r a t e s , mg/ 1
E n z y me , %( v / v ) o f r e a c t i o n
mi x t u r e
P a r a me t e r s - S i mp l e Mo d e l
Yoo c o n s t a n t s : a : 3 . 6 34 2 10
1
b :
- 2 . 6 5 8 4
10 ~
c :
6 . 0 44 2
6
d :
- 9 . 9 6 0 3
10
1
k
a
R a t e
c o n s t a n t
f o r a u t o l y s i s 3 . 9 8 7 1 0 - ^mi n
1
k
r
R a t e
c o n s t a n t
f o r l y s i s
s i mp l e
mo d e l 1 5 . 5 1 mg / L - m n - %e z
K
m
M i c h a e l i s c o n s t a n t
f o r l y s i s 1 9 0 2mg/ L
k p
R a t e
c o n s t a n t f o r
p r o t e o l y s i s ,
4 . 4 41 mg / L - m n - %e z
M i c h a e l i s c o n s t a n t ,
p r o t e o l y s i s , 4 5 9 8mg/ L
I n h i b i t i o n
c o n s t a n t ,
p r o t e o l y s i s , 2 6 0 7 7 mg
y e a s t / L
f
F r a c t i o n of
p r o t e i n
i n y e a s t 0 . 4 0 48
f
g
y
F r a c t i o n
of
p e p t i d e s
i n
y e a s t
0 . 0 7 77
f F r a c t i o n of
c a r b o h y d r a t e s
i n
y e a s t
0 . 3 6 87
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
23/230
6
SEPARATION, R E C O V E R Y , A N D PURIFICATION IN B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
f o u r r e g i o n s ; t h e o u t e r w a l l o r w a l l p r o t e i n ( WP ) ; i n n e r w a l l o r w a l l
g l u c a n ( WG ) ; t h e c y t o s o l ( C S ) a n d t h e o r g a n e l l e s ,
h e r e g r o u p e d
t o g e t h e r
a s
mi t o c h o n d r i a
( M I ) . T h e
l y t i c
s y s t e m i s a p p r o x i ma t e d a s t h r e e
e n z y me s , a
l y t i c
g l u c a n a s e , E g , wh i c h h y d r o l y z e s t h e i n n e r
c e l l
w a l l
g l u c a n , a
l y t i c
p r o t e a s e ,
E p ,
wh i c h
a t t a c k s o n l y t h e
o u t e r
w a l l l a y e r
a n d a d e s t r u c t i v e p r o t e a s e , E ^ , a c t i v e a g a i n s t s o l u b l e p r o t e i n s .
P r o d u c t i n h i b i t i o n i s i n c l u d e d i n a l l e n z y me r e a c t i o n s . A d s o r p t i o n
a n d d e s o r p t i o n o f t h e
e n z y me s
t o t h e y e a s t w a l l i s n e g l e c t e d , s i n c e
a d s o r p t i o n k i n e t i c s a p p e a r e d
i n s t a n t a n e o u s
o n t h e
t i me
s c a l e o f o u r
me a s u r e me n t s ( 3 5 ) . A s c h e ma t i c o f t h e r e a c t i o n
p a t h wa y s
i s s h o wn i n
F i g u r e 4 .
S p e c i a l v a r i a b l e s .
E G A = ( WG - r - WP )
T h e g l u c a n h y d r o l y s i s r a t e i s n o t r e l a t e d
d i r e c t l y
t o
t o t a l
g l u c a n
c o n c e n t r a t i o n WG, b u t r a t h e r t o t h e a mo u n t o f
g l u c a n
made
a c c e s s i b l e t o a t t a c k t h r o u g h r e mo v a l o f w a l l p r o t e i n f r o m t h e o u t s i d e
o f t h e
c e l l .
E G A ,
e x p o s e d
g l u c a n , a c c e s s i b l e r e p r e s e n t s t h e a mo u n t
o f g l u c a n
u n c o v e r e d
b y
r e mo v a l
o f t h e o u t e r w a l l . T h e p r o p o r t i o n a l i t y
c o n s t a n t r i s t h e
we i g h t r a t i o
o f w a l l g l u c a n t o w a l l p r o t e i n .
T h e o v e r a l l r a t e o f s o l u b l e p r o t e i n h y d r o l y s i s , P B R , p r o t e i n
b r e a k d o wn r a t e ,
a c c o u n t s
f o r d e s t r u c t i o n o f s o l u b l e p r o t e i n b y t h e
d e s t r u c t i v e p r o t e a s e .
T h e r e l e a s e o f c y t o s o l i n t o t h e
me d i u m d e p e n d s
o n t h e o s mo t i c
b r e a k a g e o f t h e p r o t o p l a s t s , wh i c h o c c u r s a t a r a t e a p p r o x i ma t e l y
p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e o s mo t i c g r a d i e n t a c r o s s t h e p l a s ma
me mb r a n e
( 3 6 ) .
T h e i n t e r n a l o s m o l a l i t y o f t h e c e l l s w a s e s t i ma t e d t o b e 0 . 6 1 7 O s / L
( 3 5 ) , wh e r e 1 O s / L i s e q u i v a l e n t t o 1
Mo l / L
o f a n i d e a l s o l u t e . T h e
e x t e r n a l o s m o l a l i t y i s t h e s u m o f t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n f r o m t h e b u f f e r
s y s t e m i n t h e me d i u m ( a b o u t 0. 02M i n o u r e x p e r i me n t s ) a n d t h e
s u b s t a n c e s
r e l e a s e d b y l y s i n g p r o t o p l a s t s . T h e
s t a b i l i z a t i o n
o f t h e
r e ma i n i n g
c e l l s
b y t h e s e s u b s t a n c e s i s f a r s t r o n g e r t h a n c o u l d b e
e x p e c t e d s o l e l y o n t h e b a s i s o f o s mo t i c e f f e c t s , a n d c o u l d r e s u l t
f r o m t h e r e l e a s e o f c a t i o n s wh i c h i n t e r a c t w i t h s p e c i f i c r e c e p t o r s
o n t h e p l a s ma
me mb r a n e
( 3 7 ) . T h e r e l e a s e o f s o l u b l e p r o d u c t s o f
g l u c a n a n d p r o t e i n h y d r o l y s i s a r e a l s o e x p e c t e d t o a d d t o t h e
s t a b i l i
z i n g e f f e c t o f t h e l y s a t e .
T h e e f f e c t i v e o s m o l a l i t y o f
c e l l
l y s a t e w a s f i t t o a L a n g mu i r
e x p r e s s i o n , wh e r e
SM
L
i s t h e maxi mum
s t a b i l i z i n g
e f f e c t a n d i s
t h e e q u i l i b r i u m c o n s t a n t f o r i n t e r a c t i o n o f t h e
s t a b i l i z e r s
w i t n t h e
p r o t o p l a s t s . T h e r e s u l t i n g e q u a t i o n ,
e x p r e s s e s
t o t a l
e f f e c t i v e o s m o l a l i t y i n t h e
l y s i s
me d i u m.
B
Q
i s t h e
o r i g i n a l
o s m o l a l i t y o f t h e
l y s i s
b u f f e r a n d C S * i s t h e s u m o f p r o t e i n ,
p e p t i d e s a n d c a r b o h y d r a t e s p r e s e n t a t t h e s t a r t o f r e a c t i o n .
P B R
SM
x
= B
0
+
Q S
V
K
o s J
C S
* +
C S
o ~
C S
>
+ ( C S * + C S - C S )
o s m
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
24/230
H U N T E R
AND A S EN JO Enzymatic LysisandDisruptionof Yeast Cells
TME
MINUTES
F i g u r e 3 S i mp l e mo d e l s i m u l a t i o n of y e a s t l y s i s
Y e a s t
c e l l
ma s s , mg 1
mg/ 1
P e p t i d e s ,
mg 1
h y d r a t e s , mg 1
0. 78 g/ 1
y e a s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n ;
10%en z y me
e n
s
5
P r o t e i n ,
-
C a r b o -
Oligopeptides
Amino
Acids
Wall
Protein
Wall
Enzymes
WallMannan
Soluble Proteins
Cytoplasmic Enzymes
1Proteaseattack
2. Glucanase attack
3 Release
of
cell
contents
4. Lysis of
organelles
5.Glucanhydrolysis
6
7. >Productproteolysis
;
/ - \
Proteins
O r g a n e l l e s - < > -
Organellar Enzymes
Carbohydrates
fl l-3)
Oligosaccharides
Glucose
F i g u r e 4 R e a c t i o n p a t h wa y s f o r s t r u c t u r e d mo d e l
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
25/230
18
S E P A R A T I O N , R E C O V E R Y , A N D P U R I F IC A T I O N IN B I O T E C H N O L O G Y
B a s e d o n t h e p r o d u c t OS M [ / K
c
t h e s t a b i l i z i n g e f f e c t o f c e l l l y
s a t e a t l o w c o n c e n t r a t i o n s i s e q u i v a l e n t t o 4. 4 1 0
H
Os/ mg c y t o s o l
r e l e a s e d ( 3 5 ) .
W a l l h y d r o l y s i s e q u a t i o n s .
d ( WP )
d t
wp ( Km
WP
w j y _
( 1 )
1 +
WP
Km
wp
WP - WP
K i
wp
d( WG)
d t
k
wg g ( Km
EGA
wg
( 2 )
l + # ^ +
Km
WG - WG
wg
Km
s g
R e l e a s e
o f c y t o s o l a n d m i t o c h o n d r i a . T h e
o s mo t i c
g r a d i e n t b e
t we e n p r o t o p l a s t s a n d b u f f e r o r m i t o c h o n d r i a a n d b u f f e r d r i v e s t h e
r e l e a s e o f p r o t e i n i n t o t h e me d i u m. I f t h e o s m o l a l i t y o f t h e e x t e r n a l
me d i u m
e x c e e d s t h e
i n t e r n a l
o s m o l a l i t y o f t h e p r o t o p l a s t o r o r g a n e l l e ,
n o r u p t u r e o c c u r s . T h e o s m o l a l i t y
d e c r e a s e s
i n t e r n a l l y , a n d i n c r e a s e s
e x t e r n a l l y , a s m a t e r i a l i s r e l e a s e d f r o m t h e p r o t o p l a s t . I n a d d i t i o n ,
t h e r e l e a s e
o f
c y t o s o l
i s
p r o p o r t i o n a l
t o t h e
s i z e
o f t h e
o p e n i n g
i n
t h e w a l l g l u c a n ,
u p t o a ma x i mu m
h o l e s i z e
o f 1/ 3 o f t h e
c e l l ^ s u r
f a c e a r e a .
d ( C S )
d t
-
( C S ) . k
f l
( C S ) k ^ ma x ^ O S M ^
CS
CS
- 0 S M
x
) ]
ma x ( . 3 3 ,
1
WG
WG
) ( 3 )
d ( M I )
d t C S ,
d ( C S )
' d t
k
r m
[ ma x ( 0 ,
0 . 3 - OS K . )
]
( 4 )
S o l u b l e p r o d u c t s .
V a l u e s
f o r T C A - i n s o l u b l e p r o t e i n , p e p t i d e s a n d
c a r b o h y d r a t e s r e l e a s e d we r e e s t i m a t e d b y s u mmi n g t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o
e a c h p o o l
f r o m
t h e b r e a k d o wn o f e a c h c e l l u l a r s t r u c t u r e .
^ - - f
d t
d ( WP )
p wp [ d t
- f
' d ( C S ) '
p e s
I
d t
f
k
[ ma x ( 0 ,
0 . 3 - OS M
) ]
- P B R
pm r m
( 5 )
DownloadedbyUNIVOFMISSOURICOLUM
BIAonOctober3,
2010|http://p
ubs.acs.org
Pu
blica
tion
Da
te:
Ju
ly11
,1986|d
oi:10
.1021/bk-1
986-0
314
.ch002
In Separation, Recovery, and Purification in Biotechnology; Asenjo, J., et al.;ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1986.
-
8/10/2019 Separation Recovery and Purification in Biotechnology 1986 Recent Advances and Mathematical Modeling
26/230
2. HUNTER
A N D ASENJO
Enzymatic
ysis
and Disruption ofYeast Cells
19
- - f -
d t s wp
' d ( WP ) '
- f
[ d t s e s
d C S l
d t
f - k [ ma x ( 0 , 0. 3 - OSM) ] - M I + PBR ( 6)
s m
r m
d
m
_ d ( WG) _ f - d ( C S )
( 7 )
d t
d t ' d t
T o t a l
y e a s t c e l l
mas s
was e s t i ma t e as t h e s um o f WG WP, CS,a n d MI
( s t r u c t u r e s r e ma i n i n g w i t h t h e c e l l ) , w i t h an a d d e d f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g
f o r n o n - p r o t e i n , n o n - c a r b o h y d r a t e s u b s t a n c e s i n t h e c e l l . T h e s e sums
g e n e r a t e v a l u e s f o r y e a s t ,
p r o t e i n ,
p e p t i d e s