SEP 172013 ou - a - Florida Supreme Court · uMMM __9fERGunEWT Thc First As p on directly nnd...
-
Upload
trinhtuyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of SEP 172013 ou - a - Florida Supreme Court · uMMM __9fERGunEWT Thc First As p on directly nnd...
1HE 3dfAcML LDuRT c FLCLIDAroo
-o
r
fehNc ñerC ASÁ NO- SC13 -L 2
S�040<deof ftpf,rk~kSfo6Áed
AMENDE
VRE$DEcTIOWAL 13RLEf 0F PETITIoWER
_hkk%tiçEdòBay Correct$ortat Facility
T recnicus o o en fotos
SEP 172013 ou - aFDR Ã DNG
5300 ß l ne Odve
a n _E7
3240
L
TABLE of CONTEN1'$
t
AGE
TA6LE OF CcNTENT5
TADLE of CETA75cN3 1
PRELEMENAA< 3TATEMENT!
STATEMENT of THE CASE AND FACT5
SUMMARY OR ARGuMENT 2
ARGvMENT 3
E55LIE L 3-9
00£3 THE AffELLATE CouAT5 DERECT AWV EXPR�254ss
OPENEQW,WETH %35dE of .GREAT' PußLEC EMPcRTAWCE
Oui WEEGH PETITZONEÅ RE6Hi TO EMMEûEATERELEASE BY NA6EAS CoHv3 AWû HAV£11/G $U63EC1'
MATTEA JunzsozcTEcd of THE Sv/REME CoVRT
CONCLQ3EÔÑ 9
CERTEFECATE OF JEAq/.EC E
APPENDEx 10
TAßLE Of crrATEon/5
AAGE
ßAGGETT c WA1o/WArGHT,229 502d 239,243(FL A 1%9) 3
.EPPS v. McN EEL, 37 Sc3d 993,92 3
( FLA is+ OcB 2cto) H
IkhbG v. $TATE,59i So2dbl4
FL A 1992 ) 9'
McARIS v. 5TATE, 977 Sold 2G9(FLA stk Ocn 20o7) T'
ÜVARLES v.5TATE, Sbso3d 9'57
( FL A ist DCA 30t I )
.5TAfVG v. STATE, 2 4 Sc 3d %b
( FL A 3rtd Oc A 2co9 ) 5
TORRES v-6TATE,700 Sold 13'17
( FL A Sth Oc A 1997) 4
ZuLünGA v, STATE,DEPT of CC RRS, 32 Sold 679,b77(FLA 15f OCA §D/O)
FLOREDA RulG5 of CREM£WAL ÊßoCEDUR�254
ÑÜLG 3.V5'O 7
FRE 1 D1TMAN srATEMENT¯
onet, Terroniciis o. Dixomy w'it! be rcGereneed in fk 5
br c K6cnet and Respondent c~5 Responde +.The Dcn
tLhe refered a s Ach, Art u derinu U b used
e 5 då erykc s
STATEMEA/T' of THE CAs AWD FAc7
n be L ± of Tc nuc ry, ac the_ srs± acB hA_5 ten _a
expcSS c d rect op n an thc~+ hc cdGirmed ike �040ric
court s dec;s,onJce Appendix A, On thz 2% oF Apr;i; 20i
h6 PehHoøeó febec~6nS rnction En ßc~nc wc~5 deniedeOn
h 1±1½ of My, 2013,the i st Dcr issued hanc ndcde, Jp
e orde 3 ven on Auws�0403(uh soi3,th s vósdidienc
uMMM __9fERGunEWT
Thc First As p on directly nnd expressly is ou
WieShcc by the fvnde entc~l d ctches Swerned by the
.Constitution ;cund,i�040fundc~mentcJly Sc~;lim to Sho«J Hnch
c bcc-s Corøv.s filed wc~.5 not n thc Sovnd jv/ sdichieri
of the covnty We/c Pet/Kc et |3 de+c~;ned,
l'urth<r, the hc~bec~5 corpus Gied by PcN+ioneer is W ¡+k;n
.3dbiccÞ avtchter jurîsdiction c+ this CoVft bect-ose- I f is to
enc c£ed_J_cAsin__c_aa fGc±md_ShWuncons±itukon) Sagradj
�040huS,bein9 o f 3rce-f puht c impor fe~nce directed to th
Florsdc- Supeme Cow+ to re snue its knde~neñ¼l eççeck ve-
e55, TheteFore, tbìS cour+ Sho,Jid 3rcrat jur,sdict cen,
c
hWA/MEWT
EssuE 3
00ES THE APPELL ATE CovRTÁ DTMof MD EXPREs3 OPENEcd TA ES
O F.GR EAT PUBL%c EMP ATAMC£j 001 WEEGA �570ETSIECA/EkÁ R EGH T TV
EMMEûZATE AELEASE BY HABEAS CoAnv3 AND i r G sv87ECT MATTE
vRISDEcTEOW oE THE SUMEME CouRT
TAl SUP20RT
A he~bec-S proceedin9 in . Cour+ ¿s fundnmenhJly umbr e
c ble byJhe cons+t&oñJh constst&om pohibib .ang bad
o f le9ssichion to Fic~nk one icA for æncther so Hnd u -
dide kc~hec~5 relense is kindered,Thus,the F st ocA kc
spic~ced these funcic~nneøfc~) Fc~d3;c+d becc use the
o 9»tten_½hese Sc cks,�040heRNNoner is 5Nil ûnp somhya
the I, s exp r o dche oS Ma.rc ia1s b 2_co3 e te u i
psant Aele d Co_vaty ha zu_cegL bc 6 h 5 e e
o o Count d seatenced Jhe
En i 9 e++ v. Je w;d t , 2 29 so2d1 3L El _L his
o + Nied p9 au
The Supreme cout+, howe e s no�040excl 5ested i th prisdiction_ovechniacc~s poceed
F. 5. Seckcø 79.C), f. 5, A,, conFess similu juris-
d ïc+cen to Circus+ Jud9e s,Neuutke less, F. 5. Sec-H on 79.09,E St A., ûmposes �040kcVEWu£ REQu£A£MÉNT'
thc~Í IA .C@seS_heborC cwCiFCutt jud3C kkW c~ppliC-oution for tk6 adrif 5NALL ߣ FZLÉD Wi'+h +kt Circvet
o f �576kLLos�040q_£n_Mbi_cK±htpKsont/ik,0f gg
nd de~5 not follouied in its opinicA cv5 Shodn by the First DCA,
Thc First Oc A s op nion e cpecssly relies on th6 cosen Icw)
oG Epps v. McWeil, 37 fn3d 923,913( Fic ist ocB 2cio) a d 7d lucoc~
v. .5 FJe, Dept. o f Corrs. 3 2 so 3d 6 N, 6 77 L fia. Ist och 2 olo), and n ot
by Flc s�040ch79.09 Which is for Subjec+ ww+He jurisd cken
fcF habce~5 Pef]+iorer omd ddainees.Toffe4 v. $tc}�254,100
So2d 12'f7(Fic~ 5thDCA1997.1],e, The proper proceduct is tô
pet tion th& Circuit Court in the Second Judicic~l Circuit
fo/ c drit o f hcrbers Corpus, $Inct inc is incarcerched
er ts e à no+ o e urts assump+ am th + e
h e n e e hko w h 5 undc n < LC e is or
ekë c re fer-se
At$o,the Niiny in $t h,29 Jo3d51 Fla. 2 cA zoo
. a lÁ vic t 9o_ un oNce c eypes�540±d ect co )
o NWo eÜ cé~se, l'n $t p3 5(o 9, they julej -
A 5 c indsc~L Mc~�040hr trec~t Jh~ngspt +/enfor W/s�040o} Certiorc~6 c~$ c~- fLkiNon for W/ �040
o f habeas corps becc~use 5tc ny is se kin9 6:simmed ù tem £�2541eAe 1to- Cds ted;y , ßecc~üse_Mc~ngil bee kin9 . hìWæmeNc~½ _ f Clen$e f£p p/isob cJect cñ cun ç~ j le-yd/y ve sçl Gen teuc ir, order£sf ehhon for Wth o·f CerKoto-t| Shoc.J ld be
freded c.5 pe-hkon for Ust of he~bee~5 Corps,Tür&vts to Eb meG�040S,WLnotc tkJ thìS
Coudá jurisdèction to coø5sde/ $b~mys habew
pehtipñ [3 quite lîmite Å, kihi le 3h~rtS uc-5 Ce v c-hd .es  Jeñ½encedä fc+1M ß cc~ch ccMty
edn fy rio± w'sth iA the ½·enitoSc ] j ut_isßct oof thi5 Cofththil Coü&Mvu_th1te35 hz~5_¾ti3-d cklon to revied fine sen_tencin older_b1cauç
c~n3 î4 CvfrenHy cwççiyn ed to the 14c~ielee
Cntre£tsonLEasti_tuhonjadhich_is__w',±hùhe terri+c1M un:sdidion of this coûM rUch_W_CsLe,_ E_b_& 5 c oø?_ 1Lf th&_£LVi endin
Coultklàquig_ i mited lo d6ekke± �040knur+ ±·hc~tîntstee _t» £ de+e£on¯Lorden
&c~5aúEtkodt4UN4diclion fO_Åo 3a oLuike#erM_oldeßs_r_adorilley~L Thclev>< oLBaguiryRWhetherlk&1rdecis go;Lol_pcêtA Hy_iligc-lp:~ncL'[t]hk et vi klæ9 CourtAc~fanL d¡JLhaag e ±ke.Áe±cunee- i G _the Jekèkm
(5 )
orcier à rnerely defecHve,irre3ular, or inso-G-Sicient in form or Subskrnce,"A$ e~ pec~ctice.Jvncdter, *C).7F th6 Chc~llenged defenkoA O(deris] d etermined . fo- hLivuviolchen e4 kht
fikNonerÍ Cons�570ÌfdfioncÅepdfo/canfe6 o de
pocess,±hes_the_tzrder dond-c iculy _k'i lley-l' c~nd not vnere iy d efeckv ey irreSuhr,of insuffic¡ent in fo(M or SQbsf&ncc,
o d in part, pleasLhle for fhis jure'sdichosnr.~l c~ccep+crnce,
furthe/, ihe F?rst DCAs aun edtòre, in Qua.dts_vAc~te,
5b so3d V57 ( Flu Ist OcB act t ) is c~ts0 c~ bc-ses For Ih:s cour+
v/isdickon. In Gvcr/les,+hey ruled-
Tke d e4erm inc~k o n o f Jk ettae d' a, comgic,in f
for the Wri+ oé habec~5 corpus sh~ks n ptt~cle ccvse for le licG_h~kes pic~ce é~+ }-kó
e<~r l ies t s h~½ o S the- proc eed ;rt5 s gth e n +ksfecord Con s sfs af o n ly �040hecompicr|n�040if$e/S,
Tkc Writ of kcrbec~5 Corpv5 is c~-Writ of ingülty
&n å t'5 I55Ú6cÌ ÞV teAf fhe re-Ce5 on5 ofy roonÅS
o f reStrc~s nt crn d d efenken," klhi le the c~dven+c f c~lterneMve, reecdGes,5uch c~s rúle 3.V50,Florida.- R dies c S Cr m;r c~ I frocedure, k c.s cuf-
1 e Å_kkemLewtanfrA gùss_fäc_CrA4cr �040ktevftc~ordincrry Mr;t to c~fte9c~Hon50 f c~ S|Fuc~tian W kere *tke- I c~uJ doe s noOfkerWise provide een cAeguch Mechern smFC ob tc~ n t thef £roca ilLeyLAtte±h'oet
Fks Writ rec~tcün 5 c~Vc icwbie for tht- Fate
Cc-se in Which c~ prìsener kc~5-been go6dedno cedegoc~tt o f effe chve Jc~y to h5t'thle3cd�041fyof his of her 'defenkom' despite.
-- -- L - - - - - ---
t k l procedartS in £ I ~), S'50
The plcrasible c Ile9eho thatppiland senknce. kcus exp;red is
Ívffìce �254nf_fo 3 crMs fr c~ #cec CCJ�254
Gor kc.bec~s Lorpos,
to tJh cd1 3kods Sir Ic~r-5dhSh~nce c 5 & 6c~t the
d Homer was Jeck j thed is, Pe6fic er did not chh c
5 Conv:c±fem or Jenhøce ces regéjited Jo be den
undeF Lilk 335V, é'/c~, R. o Cr:m, Fre,Åut rcdhtt, leNfiomefí
p kom _CIce sme d_ khr~±±e1 imnehc3e alec~5 e- i 5 req uit d
beccrdse Í+ i3 unconStihifioncÅ ænd señÞence he~Å
eyp ted nn March 1sk 200½
Hence,w bcvsic 90c~rc~nke of Florid~ Ic4 is +had
+ke rCSht ._tô a i te£ Jhro<>3 h Jhe ¿Já�040_o_£_hakee± re
d.St be *3rc~n h~hie o f N3 ht; fru l y c~m <l ul thod
Co n_Lb_of_b_ eyI ic fy J_Grwess c re
a ofed hy-_th-e t to hc~hedle I e he
- C^ o 6 Elo 6 an1 he c d hc s
been pc r i e had ed d n ut o Auz
�254øum&rc~kdin Elerid<:~s /JeCic-ec~tsom of Nebts should
be cAcrilcJole to A thro_uS h simple é d direc+ mec n s
W ithout need less comp licc~+ion o r imped i>«en+, c ø d
should be Scr rty c dministered in Pe~var e G justùe cmd
et bound by technicc~lity,
iVot even the howriest precedent t's permathd +c
trio lche the 9 0cac~m hes o F k c~bec~s re l i e f, <egoc~l pro +
ecfion, c~nd et oc~l c~ccess to the coo(+5, or c~ny other
ua dc~c1entc~L rLS_htSL5et-EnthJa_khe_kclwrc~±ion o
N9hts. Ark E, Fim Ce sh 3e�254,hic~c~9 vî Stc~te,,51i so2d GI4
C Fla, 1993%' $hde ve ßvekczar, i9( So Ad 33 ( Fia- 1%6 l( f?oce-
ed sø9 i'n ^H ~hec~s.corpus" is cIvii ec~�040her+kc~m er|msøri n
Achure, even +koo9h seu9h+ in bekc~lG cG one Chcased
of Convicted af æ chme.)j Mort;.s V. 5+c.te, 97(c Soad 259
C Fla. Sth,D c A aootr ) as conf l ìc+ ( 6ecc~use j ur is d icHon
fecfuly liës cely in cu courF With htriforic~!. juásdictiop
over the Sc~cilöy ch Which Morris is bein9 dek~sned cJ l
pleadà$s fi led Wi+h thî s cour+ ind iccas thed Morris 5
e e e c the _Te~yla Cmect o 5 ok
Peug, Act!be
( ( /CLüsTçg
This. Court he s subjed maHet jur sclic o o
c~nf fewed becc~dse fditiamer's pelstion »Jc s he~d in
frofet jur<5dictiornynd,_iLWodict he po! fe'cc~lly incorrec
to veld the 3rec~�040public- impoffe~mce &c pe6kom clullenged
fo/ Petäion etá_ûnen ekeke teiec~seAd t c c,r Nono hie
l'egues t jur sd ickomc~ l e~ccepfcæce.
CERTEFECAr£ of $ERVICE
Ty'ferrçoious D,Di¥pA NERE6Y CerGGy Fkc~f c~·Co y o H
£ckepoing bc~5 h enRn b LI, Sr Mo L lhea pr ser
n£Gc;n I s ±o
Tkt p fcl 7 é t 91-y o nm th s I de o
ep e be ao
arc ous o ×ôc Carteckion F c
90 e lù_re ût i
En/ THE JUPAEME CouRT of Flo4TDA
Tectoni^cv5 O , ()|xnça
fehh'oene/
CASE No, SC(3-f/29
V3
$4 tz nf Fler,rie~
hespoøcI�254îa Þ
AffENQrx
(Ji^×oft v. 5+Je IIV Sc3d 915'l Fla, ist OcA 2ci 3)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALFIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
TERRONIOUS D. DIXON,
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TOAppellant, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D12-3418STATE OF FLORIDA,
AppeQçg
Opinion filed January 31, 2013.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.James B. Fensom, Judge.
Terronious D. Dixon, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela 30 Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C, Conley, Assistant AttorneyGeneral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Because appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus was not filed in the
sentencing court, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to address it. See, eg, Epps v.
_McNeil, 37 So. 3d 923, 923 (Fla. f st DCA 2010); Zuluaga v. State, Dep't of