Sensitive Biomarker Analysis of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu Capsule for Patients with Qi...
Transcript of Sensitive Biomarker Analysis of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu Capsule for Patients with Qi...
Research ArticleSensitive Biomarker Analysis of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu Capsule forPatients with Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis Pattern: A NestedCase-Control Study
Guang Chen ,1,2 Haoqiang He,1,2 Kun Hu ,1 Jialiang Gao ,1 Jun Li ,1 Mei Han ,3
and Jie Wang 1
1Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China2Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China3Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Jie Wang; [email protected]
Received 4 May 2019; Revised 21 September 2019; Accepted 26 September 2019; Published 18 November 2019
Academic Editor: Arthur De Sa Ferreira
Copyright © 2019 Guang Chen et al. .is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objectives. To identify the sensitive biomarker to predict the effectiveness of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu capsules (XFZYC). Methods. .isnested case-control study included 5 patients with response to XFZYC in the treatment group, 5 patients with no response toXFZYC also in the treatment group, and 5 patients in the control group treated with placebo who participated in the previousRCT. .e mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs were sequenced by next-generation sequencing and differential-expressed(DE) RNAs were identified if p value≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥2, bioinformatics analysis was conducted in terms of functionannotations and signaling pathways, and then sensitive biomarker was analyzed based on real-time PCR. Results..e distributionsof clinical characteristics between the selected participants from treatment group and placebo group were well balanced. A total of1156 DE RNAs, 388 miRNAs, 1954 lncRNAs, and 560 circRNAs were identified, which was associated the mechanism of XFZYCand composed the targeted potential biomarkers for further real-time PCR. .e DE RNAs were enriched in KEGG pathwayspertaining to pathogenesis of Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis- (QS & BS-) & associated diseases such as coronary heart disease anddigestive diseases. .e expression level of FZD8 was significantly higher in response patients than that in nonresponse patients(p � 0.041) and circRNA_13799 significantly lower in response patients than that in nonresponse patients (p � 0.040) based onreal-time PCR. Patients with higher expression level of FZD8 with 75% stratification have significantly higher reduction in thequestionnaire score (p � 0.010), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.765 (95%CI = 0.593–0.936; p � 0.014). Conclusions.FZD8 might perform the sensitive biomarker for predicting the effectiveness of XFZYC. However, further prospective cohortstudy was warranted to confirm the exact specificity and sensitivity of this biomarker.
1. Introduction
Within the framework of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) theory, TCM practitioners always prescribe theherbal formula or acupuncture therapy according to thedifferentiation of TCM Zheng [1]. Hence, the diagnosiscriteria of a sort of specific Zheng were often included in theinclusion criteria for a randomized clinical trial (RCT) interms of Research and Development (R&D) of TCM newdrug, in order to target the population with that kind ofZheng. However, in one of our previous clinical trials to
investigate the effects of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu capsules (XFZYC),a kind of herbal medicine approved by the China Food andDrug Administration (CFDA), for patients with Qi Stag-nation and Blood Stasis (QS&BS), a sort of typical Zheng,where QS&BS diagnosis criteria has been used for partici-pants inclusion, the data of primary outcome in the XFZYCgroup failed to be within normality and the scatter diagramdemonstrated that certain participants receiving XFZYCshowed response in effectiveness while some participantsindicated nonresponse. .is abnormal distribution directlyaffected the statistical inference of the data and the
HindawiEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative MedicineVolume 2019, Article ID 7182865, 12 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7182865
interpretation of the results of the clinical trial, which mightlead to the negative conclusion of the trial.
One of the reasons why there existed both response andnonresponse participants in the treatment group was thatthe QS&BS diagnosis criteria currently used in the trial wasnot adequate enough to target the exact population of onlyresponse patients. It has been reported that herbal medicinefeatured multicomponents and corresponding multitargetsto perform the healing function [2], and a network phar-macology study of XFZYC for QS&BS predicted that therewere 6 targets mostly possible for the merged network andtarget fishing [3]. Hence, we hypothesize that some patientswith QS&BS are sensitive to the targets of XFZYC whileothers even with the same Zheng diagnosed by QS&BScriteria are insensitive to those targets, which might be theprofound mechanism of the phenomenon of both responseand nonresponse. Sensitive biomarker is just a sort ofphysiological substance in human body that when present inabnormal amounts in the serum may indicate the presenceof disease or predict to what extent patients could respond tothe therapy [4]. .erefore, to find the sensitive biomarkerhaving the capacity to predict the effectiveness of XFZYC iscrucial to narrow the scope of targeted population to theexact response population in the clinical trial.
.e genetic profile of an individual provides informationon what could theoretically happen in the body, whileprotein expression profiles are representative of the pro-cesses that are active in the body at the time-point of de-termination [5]. Of note, ribonucleic acid (RNA) builds theconnection between deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) andproteins, which features the interaction of genotype andenvironment. Among the different types of RNAs, mes-senger RNAs (mRNAs) are transcripts of DNA and theinformation they carry is transferred by their translation intoproteins [6]. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class ofnon-protein-coding RNAs of >200 nucleotides in length,and they are known to have roles in controlling chromatinstructure, transcriptional regulation, and posttranscriptionalprocessing [7, 8]. Furthermore, circular RNAs (circRNAs),which have drawn an increasing amount of attention re-cently, are a type of noncanonical form of alternative splicingand are more stable than linear RNAs [9, 10]. .erefore, theobjective of this study was to identify the sensitive biomarkerto predict the effectiveness of XFZYC by nested case-controldesign through transcriptome next-generation sequencingand real-time PCR in terms of RNAs.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients and Samples for RNA Sequencing. .e protocolof the present study was approved by the Ethics Committeeof Guang’anmen Hospital (Beijing, China). In our previousRCT, eligible participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria forQS&BS pattern whose specificity and sensitivity of diagnosisare 81.91% and 80.35%, respectively [11]; the interventiongroup was treated with XFZYC, and the control group wasplacebo with 6 capsules of XFZYC or placebo 2 times dailyand the duration was 7 weeks; the primary outcome was thechange in the patient-reported QS&BS pattern questionnaire
score from baseline to the end of the 7-week intervention..is questionnaire is a well-validated, multidimensionalmeasurement of overall severity of QS&BS pattern [12]. .eprotocol of this previous trial was registered at the Clin-icalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03091634).
.is nested case-control study was designed and con-ducted based on the previous RCT. .is study included 5patients with response to XFZYC in the treatment group(response group), 5 patients with no response to XFZYC alsoin the treatment group (nonresponse group), and 5 patientsin the control group treated with placebo (placebo group)who presented at Guang’anmen Hospital affiliated to theChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (Beijing,China) between June 2017 to August 2018 and participatedin our previous RCT. Response was identified with reductionin this questionnaire score of >30%, while nonresponse with<30%. Blood sample was collected in 5 participants withresponse to XFZYC before the treatment (group Case1_-before) and after the treatment (group Case1_after), 5participants with no response to XFZYC before the treat-ment (group Case2_before), and 5 participants treated withplacebo before the treatment (group Control_before) andafter the treatment (group Control_after). From each of thepatients, blood samples (3-4ml) were collected in EDTA-containing tubes. Informed consent was provided by all ofthe participants prior to the study.
2.2. RNA Isolation and Library Preparation. RNA degra-dation and contamination were monitored on 1% agarosegels. RNA purity was confirmed using the AgencourtAMPure XP (cat. no. A63881; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA,USA). RNA integrity was evaluated using the Agilent 2100bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA,USA). .e sample with RNA integrity number ≥7 wassubjected to the subsequent analysis. .e library was con-structed using TruSeq-stranded total RNA with Ribo-ZeroGold (cat. no. 15021048; Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA)according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.3. Sequencing of RNAs and DE RNA Analysis. .e librarywas sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platformHiSeqTM 2500, and 150 bp/125 bp paired-end reads weregenerated. Trimmomatic software (version 0.36) [13] wasused to further filter the quality of the raw data generatedfrom the sequencing to get the high-quality clean reads, thenHierarchical Indexing for Spliced Alignment of Transcripts(version 0.1.6-beta) [14] was used to align clean reads to thereference of human beings, Stringtie software (version 1.3.5)[15] was used to assemble the reads so that the transcript wasspliced. .e spliced transcription products of each samplewere combined and screened as lncRNAs with Cuffmergeprogram in the Cufflinks software package (version 2.2.1).All transcripts that overlapped with known mRNAs, othernoncoding RNA, and non-lncRNA were discarded. Next,the transcripts longer than 200 bp and >2 exons were ob-tained, and CPC (version 0.9-r2) [16], PLEK (version 1.2)[17], CNCI (version 1.0) [18], and Pfam (version 30) [19]software packages were used to predict transcripts with
2 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
coding potential. .e characteristics (including length, type,and number of exons) of lncRNA were analyzed afterscreening by the Cuffcompare program [20] in the Cufflinks2.2.1 software package. CircRNAs were identified using CIRI[21] and compared with the circBase [22] and with thedatabase of CircAtlas 2.0 with species-focused integratedresource of Homo sapiens [23]. .e estimate size factorsfunction in R package DESeq [24] was used to normalize thecounts, and nbinom test in the package was used to calculatethe p value as well as fold change for the difference com-parison. .e difference comparison was conducted betweengroup Case1_before and Case1_after, between Con-trol_before and Control_after, and between Case1_beforeand Case2_before, to get 3 sets of differential-expressed (DE)RNAs for further analysis of sensitive biomarker. DE RNAswere identified if p value≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥2.
2.4. GO Annotations and KEGG Pathway Analysis. Geneontology (GO) annotations and Kyoto Encyclopedia ofGenes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were per-formed to investigate the possible roles of the DE RNAs. GOannotations were performed to identify regulatory networksof DE genes (http://geneontology.org). KEGG analysis wasalso performed to explore the enriched pathways of the DERNAs based on the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). To reveal the role and interactions among the DERNAs, an RNA regulatory network was constructed usingCytoscape software version 3.2.1 (http://www.cytoscape.org/)based on the prediction and interaction analysis by miRWalk2.0 (http://zmf.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk2/) and starBase 3.0 (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/).
2.5. Real-Time PCR and Sensitivity Analysis. A series ofclinical data and blood sample were collected from 30participants with both response and nonresponse to XFZYCin treatment group before intervention. .e expressionlevels of the core RNAs in the regulatory network wereconfirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. Sensitive bio-marker analysis was conducted to identify the RNA thatcould predict the effectiveness of XFZYC among patientsdiagnosed with QS&BS and to further validate the associ-ation between DE RNAs and response degree to XFZYC.
2.6. Statistical Analysis. .e data regarding the clinicalcharacteristics of the participants are expressed as themean± standard error of the mean, and the correspondingresults were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis ofvariance. .e results of DE RNAs in the comparison ofCase1_before vs Case1_after, Control_before vs Control_-after, and Case1_before vs Case2_before were analyzed bythe algorithm of DESeq2 in R software [24], and overlap DERNAs between these three comparisons were identified byVenn’s diagram [25]. 2− ΔCt data generated from real-timePCR were used to compare the confirmed DE RNAs [26]..e multiple regression analysis was used to determine theindependent predictive factors for response of XFZYC.Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to
analyze the predictive value of the biomarker. All statisticalanalyses were performed using R software, and p< 0.05 wasconsidered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Characteristics of Participants. .e distributionsof clinical characteristics between the selected participantsfrom treatment group and placebo group are listed in Ta-ble 1. .e 2 groups were matched in terms of sex, age, race,Body-mass index, and severity of the pattern, and there wereno significant differences in terms of self-reported coexistingillness and routine medication between the groups(p> 0.05).
3.2. DE RNAs and 6eir Overlap among Groups. .e resultsof the DE RNAs in the comparisons were as follows: a total of58 DE mRNAs (46 upregulated and 12 downregulated), 17DE miRNAs (8 upregulated and 9 downregulated), 691 DElncRNAs (317 upregulated and 374 downregulated), and 161DE circRNAs (95 upregulated and 66 downregulated) wereidentified with fold change >2 and p value <0.05 in com-parison between Case1_before and Case1_after, respectively.In comparison between Control_before and Control_after, atotal of 71 DE mRNAs (37 upregulated and 34 down-regulated), 16 DE miRNAs (9 upregulated and 7 down-regulated), 616 DE lncRNAs (259 upregulated and 357downregulated), and 34 DE circRNAs (14 upregulated and20 downregulated) were identified with fold change >2 and p
value <0.05, respectively. After removing the overlapped DERNA between Case1_before vs Case1_after and Con-trol_before vs Control_after, the unique DE RNA inCase1_before vs Case1_after included 1156 DE RNAs, 388miRNAs, 1954 lncRNAs, and 560 circRNAs, which wereassociated the mechanism of XFZYC and composed thetargeted potential biomarkers for further real-time PCR. Incomparison between Case1_before and Case2_before, a totalof 107 DE mRNAs (39 upregulated and 68 downregulated),45 DE miRNAs (12 upregulated and 33 downregulated), 721DE lncRNAs (383 upregulated and 338 downregulated), and242 DE circRNAs (148 upregulated and 94 downregulated)were identified with fold change >2 and p value< 0.05,which also formed the potential biomarkers for further real-time PCR..e top 10 upregulated and top 10 downregulatedDE mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs are listed inSupplementary Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and theclustering maps as well as volcano plot was displayed inFigures 1–3 in terms of Case1_before vs Case1_after,Control_before vs Control_after, and Case1_before vsCase2_before, respectively.
3.3. Functional Prediction and Merged Interactions of RNAs.To further determine the possible functions of the DE RNAsand to investigate the association between these functionsand underlying mechanisms in the biological networks,significant GO terms in the categories of biological process,cellular component, and molecular function are shownFigures 4–7 in terms of mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 3
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study participants∗.
Variable Response group (n� 5) Nonresponse group (n� 5) Placebo group (n� 5)Sex, nMale 3 4 3
Age, yrMean age (SD) 49.80± 6.68 43.80± 18.32 42.60± 13.22
Race, nHan 5 5 5
Body-mass index‡ 21.39± 3.79 22.90± 0.56 24.34± 4.10Severity of QS&BS pattern§ 34.40± 10.11 31.60± 6.03 34.00± 5.34Self-reported coexisting illness, n (%)Atherosclerosis 1 0 2Digestive system disease 3 1 0Reproductive system disease 3 3 1Osteoarthritis 1 2 1Hypertension 0 1 1Diabetes 0 0 0
Routine medications, n (%)Antiplatelet drugs 0 0 1Antihypertensive drug 0 1 1Statins 0 0 0Oral hypoglycemic drugs 0 0 0
XFZYC�Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu Capsules; QS&BS�Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis. ∗Plus-minus values are mean± SD unless otherwise noted. ‡Bodymass index isthe weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height inmeters. §Severity of QS&BS pattern is assessed by the scores of the items in diagnostic criteria forQS&BS pattern. Scores range from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating more severe pattern of diagnosis.
pXFZ
Y5pX
FZY4
pXFZ
Y1pX
FZY2
pXFZ
Y3XF
ZY2
XFZY
4XF
ZY5
XFZY
1XF
ZY3
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
ConditionCase1_a�erCase1_before
(a)
log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
FilteredUpDown
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
–2 0 2 4
(b)
ConditionCase1_a�erCase1_before
XFZY
1XF
ZY5
XFZY
3XF
ZY2
XFZY
4pX
FZY3
pXFZ
Y4pX
FZY5
pXFZ
Y1pX
FZY2
ConditionCondition
−2
−1
0
1
2hsa−miR−1268a
hsa−miR−605−3p
hsa−miR−1249−5p
hsa−miR−151b
novel525_mature
(c)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
–log
10 p
val
ue
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log2 fold change
FilteredUpDown
(d)
ConditionCase1_a�erCase1_before
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
XFZY
1XF
ZY5
XFZY
3XF
ZY2
XFZY
4pX
FZY1
pXFZ
Y4pX
FZY3
pXFZ
Y2pX
FZY5
(e)
–log
10 p
val
ue
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
−4 −2 0 2 4 log2 fold change
NormalUpDown
(f )
ConditionCase1_a�erCase1_before
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
XFZY
3XF
ZY5
XFZY
2XF
ZY1
XFZY
4pX
FZY1
pXFZ
Y3pX
FZY5
pXFZ
Y2pX
FZY4
(g)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
–log
10 p
val
ue
−2 −1 0 1 2 log2 fold change
NormalUpDown
(h)
Figure 1: Clustering map and volcano plot of DE RNAs for comparison of Case1_before and Case1_after. (a, c, e, g) Heat maps present thehierarchical clustering of DE RNAs with upregulated RNAsmarked in red and downregulated ones marked in blue. (b, d, f, h) Volcano plotsindicate up- and downregulated RNAs with |log2FC|> 1 and p< 0.05, where upregulated RNA was marked in red and downregulated RNAwas marked in green. From left to right, mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA are shown in sequence.
4 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CON2
CON5
CON4
CON1
CON3
pCON4
pCON2
pCON3
pCON1
pCON5
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
ConditionControl_afterControl_before
(a)
0
2
4
6
8
–4 –2 0 2 4log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
FilteredUpDown
(b)
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
pCON2
pCON4
pCON5
CON2
pCON1
pCON3
CON1
CON4
CON3
CON5
novel478_maturenovel518_maturenovel153_maturenovel308_maturehsa−miR−539−3pnovel886_maturehsa−miR−1268anovel84_maturehsa−miR−3190−3pnovel39_maturenovel677_maturenovel225_maturehsa−miR−217−5pnovel96_maturehsa−let−7c−5phsa−miR−1268b
Condition
ConditionControl_afterControl_before
(c)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
–log
10 p
val
ue
–8 –6 –4 –2 0 2 4log2 fold change
FilteredUpDown
(d)
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
CON4
CON3
CON5
CON1
CON2
pCON3
pCON5
pCON4
pCON1
pCON2
ConditionControl_afterControl_before
(e)
–log
10 p
val
ue
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
–2 0 2 4log2 fold change
NormalUpDown
(f )
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
CON2
CON1
CON3
CON4
CON5
pCON5
pCON2
pCON3
pCON1
pCON4
ConditionControl_afterControl_before
(g)
–log
10 p
val
ue
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
–1.5 –1.0 –0.5 0.0 1.0 1.5log2 fold change
NormalUpDown
(h)
Figure 2: Clustering map and volcano plot of DE RNAs for comparison of Control_before and Control_after. (a, c, e, g) Heat maps presentthe hierarchical clustering of DE RNAs with upregulated RNA marked in red and downregulated RNA marked in blue. (b, d, f, h) volcanoplots indicate up- and downregulated RNAs with |log2FC|> 1 and p value< 0.05, where upregulated RNA was marked in red anddownregulated was marked in green. From left to right, mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA are shown in sequence.
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
ConditionCase1_beforeCase2_before
XFZY
3XF
ZY2
XFZY
4XF
ZY1
XFZY
5nX
FZY1
nXFZ
Y3nX
FZY5
nXFZ
Y2nX
FZY4
(a)
0
1
2
3
4
–6 –4 –2 0 2 4log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
FilteredUpDown
(b)
ConditionCase1_beforeCase2_before
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2Conditionhsa−miR−375−3pnovel699_maturenovel1111_maturenovel7_starhsa−miR−135b−5phsa−miR−3161hsa−miR−2278novel352_maturehsa−miR−218−5phsa−miR−190a−5phsa−miR−219a−2−3phsa−miR−4664−3pnovel274_maturenovel397_maturehsa−miR−224−5phsa−miR−452−5phsa−miR−1268bnovel1129_maturenovel1114_maturenovel294_maturehsa−miR−1255anovel132_maturenovel819_maturenovel1455_maturehsa−miR−3667−3phsa−miR−6838−5pnovel1245_mature
nXFZ
Y2nX
FZY1
nXFZ
Y4nX
FZY3
nXFZ
Y5XF
ZY1
XFZY
4XF
ZY5
XFZY
2XF
ZY3
(c)
log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
0
1
2
3
4
5
–4 –2 0 2 4
FilteredUpDown
(d)
Figure 3: Continued.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 5
ConditionCase1_beforeCase2_before
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2XF
ZY5
XFZY
3XF
ZY1
XFZY
2XF
ZY4
nXFZ
Y1nX
FZY3
nXFZ
Y5nX
FZY2
nXFZ
Y4
(e)
log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
–5 0 5
NormalUpDown
(f )
ConditionCase1_beforeCase2_before
Condition
−2
−1
0
1
2
nXFZ
Y3nX
FZY5
nXFZ
Y1nX
FZY2
nXFZ
Y4XF
ZY1
XFZY
2XF
ZY5
XFZY
3XF
ZY4
(g)
log2 fold change
–log
10 p
val
ue
–4 –2 0 2 4
0
1
2
3
4
5
NormalUpDown
(h)
Figure 3: Clusteringmap and volcano plot of DE RNAs for comparison of Case1_before and Case2_before. (a, c, e, g) Heat maps present thehierarchical clustering of DE RNAs with upregulated RNAmarked in red and downregulated RNAmarked in blue. (b, d, f, h) Volcano plotsindicate up- and downregulated RNAs with |log2FC|> 1 and p< 0.05, where upregulated RNA was marked in red and downregulated RNAwas marked in green. From left to right, mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA are shown in sequence.
(a) (b) (c)
Biol
ogic
al ad
hesio
nBi
olog
ical
regu
latio
nC
ell k
illin
gC
ellul
ar co
mpo
nent
org
aniz
atio
n or
bio
gene
sisC
ellu
lar p
roce
ssD
evelo
pmen
tal p
roce
ssEs
tabl
ishm
ent o
f loc
aliz
atio
nG
row
thIm
mun
e sys
tem
pro
cess
Loca
lizat
ion
Loco
mot
ion
Met
abol
ic p
roce
ssM
ulti−
orga
nism
pro
cess
Mul
ticel
lula
r org
anism
al p
roce
ssN
egat
ive r
egul
atio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssPo
sitiv
e reg
ulat
ion
of b
iolo
gica
l pro
cess
Regu
latio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssRe
prod
uctio
nRe
prod
uctiv
e pro
cess
Resp
onse
to st
imul
usRh
ythm
ic p
roce
ssSi
gnal
ing
Sing
le−o
rgan
ism p
roce
ssC
ell
Cel
l jun
ctio
nC
ell p
art
Extr
acel
lula
r mat
rixEx
trac
ellu
lar m
atrix
par
tEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
nEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
n pa
rtM
acro
mol
ecul
ar co
mpl
exM
embr
ane
Mem
bran
e par
tM
embr
ane−
enclo
sed
lum
enM
itoch
ondr
ion−
asso
ciat
ed ad
here
ns co
mpl
exN
ucle
oid
Org
anel
leO
rgan
elle
par
tSy
mpl
ast
Syna
pse
Syna
pse p
art
Virio
nVi
rion
part
D−a
lany
l car
rier a
ctiv
ityA
ntio
xida
nt ac
tivity
Bind
ing
Cata
lytic
activ
ityCh
anne
l reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Chem
oattr
acta
nt ac
tivity
Chem
orep
elle
nt ac
tivity
Elec
tron
carr
ier a
ctiv
ityEn
zym
e reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Met
allo
chap
eron
e act
ivity
Mol
ecul
ar tr
ansd
ucer
activ
ityM
orph
ogen
activ
ityN
ucle
ic ac
id b
indi
ng tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityN
utrie
nt re
serv
oir a
ctiv
ityPr
otei
n bi
ndin
g tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityPr
otei
n ta
gRe
cept
or ac
tivity
Rece
ptor
regu
lator
activ
itySt
ruct
ural
mol
ecul
e act
ivity
Tran
slatio
n re
gulat
or ac
tivity
Tran
spor
ter a
ctiv
ity
Perc
enta
ge o
f gen
es
0.1
1
10
100
Biological process Cellular component Molecular function
0
0
4
49
18
184
1843
18434
Gen
e num
ber
AllDeg
(d)
Figure 4: GO analysis of DE mRNAs. ¡e GO enrichment analysis of DE RNAs is represented by directed acyclic graph in (a), (b),and (c), and the GO terms and number are shown by histogram in (d).
6 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
circRNA, respectively, and enrichment analysis based onKEGG database is shown in Figure 8(a) in terms of mRNA,miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA, respectively. .e DE RNAswere enriched in KEGG pathways such as glyoxylate anddicarboxylate metabolism, glycine, serine and threoninemetabolism, neomycin, kanamycin and gentamicin bio-synthesis, lipoic acid metabolism, steroid biosynthesis, andone carbon pool by folate. .e interaction analysis of DERNAs is shown in Figure 8(b) in terms of the mergednetwork of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and in Figure 8(c) interms of the network of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA.
3.4. Real-Time PCR and Sensitive Biomarker Prediction.To validate the association between DE RNAs and responseto XFZYC, a set of 30 patients with both response andnonresponse was further analyzed by using quantitative real-time PCR. Consistently, we found the expression level of
FZD8 was significantly higher in response patients than thatin nonresponse patients (p � 0.041) and circRNA_13799significantly lower in response patients than that in non-response patients (p � 0.040) as is shown in Table 2, con-firming that the higher expression of FZD8 and lowerexpression of circRNA_13799 are associated with a betterresponse to XFZYC. Furthermore, analyzing the reductionin questionnaire score of these 30 patients after 50%, 75%,and 90% stratification by the level of FZD8 andcircRNA_13799 revealed that only patients with higherexpression level of FZD8 with 75% stratification have sig-nificantly higher reduction in questionnaire score (p �
0.010). Nevertheless, multiple regression analysis showedthat only the level of FZD8 could be an independent pre-dictive factor for response to XFZYC (p � 0.0003). Toevaluate this predictive value, the ROC curve was used toanalyze the sensitivity and specificity. .e area under thecurve (AUC) was 0.765 (95%CI� 0.593–0.936; p � 0.014).
(a) (b) (c)
Biol
ogic
al ad
hesio
nBi
olog
ical
regu
latio
nC
ell k
illin
gC
ellul
ar co
mpo
nent
org
aniz
atio
n or
bio
gene
sisC
ellu
lar p
roce
ssD
evelo
pmen
tal p
roce
ssEs
tabl
ishm
ent o
f loc
aliz
atio
nG
row
thIm
mun
e sys
tem
pro
cess
Loca
lizat
ion
Loco
mot
ion
Met
abol
ic p
roce
ssM
ulti−
orga
nism
pro
cess
Mul
ticel
lula
r org
anism
al p
roce
ssN
egat
ive r
egul
atio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssPo
sitiv
e reg
ulat
ion
of b
iolo
gica
l pro
cess
Regu
latio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssRe
prod
uctio
nRe
prod
uctiv
e pro
cess
Resp
onse
to st
imul
usRh
ythm
ic p
roce
ssSi
gnal
ing
Sing
le−o
rgan
ism p
roce
ssC
ell
Cel
l jun
ctio
nC
ell p
art
Extr
acel
lula
r mat
rixEx
trac
ellu
lar m
atrix
par
tEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
nEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
n pa
rtM
acro
mol
ecul
ar co
mpl
exM
embr
ane
Mem
bran
e par
tM
embr
ane−
enclo
sed
lum
enM
itoch
ondr
ion−
asso
ciat
ed ad
here
ns co
mpl
exN
ucle
oid
Org
anel
leO
rgan
elle
par
tSy
mpl
ast
Syna
pse
Syna
pse p
art
Virio
nVi
rion
part
D−a
lany
l car
rier a
ctiv
ityA
ntio
xida
nt ac
tivity
Bind
ing
Cata
lytic
activ
ityCh
anne
l reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Chem
oattr
acta
nt ac
tivity
Chem
orep
elle
nt ac
tivity
Elec
tron
carr
ier a
ctiv
ityEn
zym
e reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Met
allo
chap
eron
e act
ivity
Mol
ecul
ar tr
ansd
ucer
activ
ityM
orph
ogen
activ
ityN
ucle
ic ac
id b
indi
ng tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityN
utrie
nt re
serv
oir a
ctiv
ityPr
otei
n bi
ndin
g tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityPr
otei
n ta
gRe
cept
or ac
tivity
Rece
ptor
regu
lator
activ
itySt
ruct
ural
mol
ecul
e act
ivity
Tran
slatio
n re
gulat
or ac
tivity
Tran
spor
ter a
ctiv
ity
Perc
enta
ge o
f gen
es
0.1
1
10
100
Biological process Cellular component Molecular function
4
48
480
4802
103
1036
10369
103695
Gen
e num
ber
AllDeg
(d)
Figure 5: GO analysis of DE miRNAs. .e GO enrichment analysis of DE RNAs is represented by directed acyclic graph in (a), (b),and (c), and the GO terms and number are shown by histogram in (d).
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 7
.ese findings suggested that increased expression of FZD8may be responsible for high sensitivity to XFZYC andpredicting the response in QS&BS patients.
4. Discussion
In the present study, expression profiles of mRNA, miRNA,lncRNA, and circRNA were obtained by next-generationsequencing and compared in before-treatment and after-treatment of participants selected in the randomized clinicaltrials and also compared in response and nonresponseparticipants within the nested case-control design, and thensensitive biomarker for predicting the effectiveness ofXFZYC was analyzed based on the functional prediction andmerged interactions of the identified DE RNAs. Patientswith higher expression level of FZD8 with 75% stratificationhave significantly higher reduction in questionnaire score,indicating a better response.
XFZYC is a common Chinese patent medicine approvedby CFDA for treating QS &BS pattern. However, there wereboth response and nonresponse participants in the treat-ment group in our previous randomized clinical trial, whichindicated that the diagnosis criteria for QS&BS pattern in theclinical trial should be further narrowed, that is, the in-dications of the population for XFZYC should be clarifiedand specified so that the population with response could betargeted in the clinical trial and in the clinical practice.Adding the objective sensitive biomarker of FZD8 with 75%stratification to the diagnosis criteria composed of onlysymptoms and signs we currently used might specificallynarrow the scope of targeted population and then improvethe effectiveness of XFZYC.
.e function annotation of the DE RNAs indicated thatthe sensitive biomarker FZD8 is a member of the frizzledgene family and a sort of receptor for Wnt proteins, and thecomponent of the Wnt-Fzd-LRP5-LRP6 complex could
(a) (b) (c)
Biol
ogic
al ad
hesio
nBi
olog
ical
regu
latio
nC
ell k
illin
gC
ellul
ar co
mpo
nent
org
aniz
atio
n or
bio
gene
sisC
ellu
lar p
roce
ssD
evelo
pmen
tal p
roce
ssEs
tabl
ishm
ent o
f loc
aliz
atio
nG
row
thIm
mun
e sys
tem
pro
cess
Loca
lizat
ion
Loco
mot
ion
Met
abol
ic p
roce
ssM
ulti−
orga
nism
pro
cess
Mul
ticel
lula
r org
anism
al p
roce
ssN
egat
ive r
egul
atio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssPo
sitiv
e reg
ulat
ion
of b
iolo
gica
l pro
cess
Regu
latio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssRe
prod
uctio
nRe
prod
uctiv
e pro
cess
Resp
onse
to st
imul
usRh
ythm
ic p
roce
ssSi
gnal
ing
Sing
le−o
rgan
ism p
roce
ssC
ell
Cel
l jun
ctio
nC
ell p
art
Extr
acel
lula
r mat
rixEx
trac
ellu
lar m
atrix
par
tEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
nEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
n pa
rtM
acro
mol
ecul
ar co
mpl
exM
embr
ane
Mem
bran
e par
tM
embr
ane−
enclo
sed
lum
enM
itoch
ondr
ion−
asso
ciat
ed ad
here
ns co
mpl
exN
ucle
oid
Org
anel
leO
rgan
elle
par
tSy
mpl
ast
Syna
pse
Syna
pse p
art
Virio
nVi
rion
part
D−a
lany
l car
rier a
ctiv
ityA
ntio
xida
nt ac
tivity
Bind
ing
Cata
lytic
activ
ityCh
anne
l reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Chem
oattr
acta
nt ac
tivity
Chem
orep
elle
nt ac
tivity
Elec
tron
carr
ier a
ctiv
ityEn
zym
e reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Met
allo
chap
eron
e act
ivity
Mol
ecul
ar tr
ansd
ucer
activ
ityM
orph
ogen
activ
ityN
ucle
ic ac
id b
indi
ng tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityN
utrie
nt re
serv
oir a
ctiv
ityPr
otei
n bi
ndin
g tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityPr
otei
n ta
gRe
cept
or ac
tivity
Rece
ptor
regu
lator
activ
itySt
ruct
ural
mol
ecul
e act
ivity
Tran
slatio
n re
gulat
or ac
tivity
Tran
spor
ter a
ctiv
ity
Perc
enta
ge o
f gen
es
0.1
1
10
100
Biological process Cellular component Molecular function
0
2
22
221
24
245
2450
24506
Gen
e num
ber
AllDeg
(d)
Figure 6: GO analysis of DE lncRNAs. .e GO enrichment analysis of DE RNAs is represented by directed acyclic graph in (a), (b),and (c), and the GO terms and number are shown by histogram in (d).
8 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
trigger beta-catenin signaling through inducing aggregationof receptor-ligand complexes into ribosome-sized signal-osomes [27]. .is signaling pathway could lead to the ac-tivation of disheveled proteins, inhibition of GSK-3 kinase,nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin, and activation of Wnttarget genes. Moreover, FZD8 also gets involved in PKC andcalcium fluxes pathway. Both these two pathways seem toinvolve interactions with G-proteins and to participate in theprocess of transduction and intercellular transmissionduring tissue morphogenesis and pathology of inflammation[28]. Bioinformatics analysis of the RNA sequencing resultsof the present study indicated that DE RNAs were mostsignificantly enriched in pathways including Wnt signalingpathway, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, glycine,serine and threonine metabolism, and homologous re-combination. .ese results imply that the pharmacologicalfunctions of XFZYC is associated with both pathogenesis ofQS&BS associated diseases such as coronary heart disease,
digestive diseases, osteoporosis, and type 2 diabetes [29] andvital metabolism process [30]. In the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks, the coreregulator hsa-miR-137 is closely associated with the nervesystem [31], and hsa-miR-451a performs the function in theprocess of myocardial lesions [32].
To the best of our knowledge, the present study was thefirst to explore the sensitive biomarker for effectiveness ofXFZYC and it was attempted to interpret the phenomenonof existing of both response and nonresponse patients, fromthe perspective of RNAs, which was determined by next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR within the designof nested case control. It is worth mentioning that thissensitive biomarker could be used in future clinical trial interms of inclusion criteria and that the design of nested case-control in this study might be implemented to discoverbiomarker of a sort of Chinese herbal formulae in furtherstudies. However, one of the limitations of the present study
(a) (b) (c)
Biol
ogic
al ad
hesio
nBi
olog
ical
regu
latio
nC
ell k
illin
gC
ellul
ar co
mpo
nent
org
aniz
atio
n or
bio
gene
sisC
ellu
lar p
roce
ssD
evelo
pmen
tal p
roce
ssEs
tabl
ishm
ent o
f loc
aliz
atio
nG
row
thIm
mun
e sys
tem
pro
cess
Loca
lizat
ion
Loco
mot
ion
Met
abol
ic p
roce
ssM
ulti−
orga
nism
pro
cess
Mul
ticel
lula
r org
anism
al p
roce
ssN
egat
ive r
egul
atio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssPo
sitiv
e reg
ulat
ion
of b
iolo
gica
l pro
cess
Regu
latio
n of
bio
logi
cal p
roce
ssRe
prod
uctio
nRe
prod
uctiv
e pro
cess
Resp
onse
to st
imul
usRh
ythm
ic p
roce
ssSi
gnal
ing
Sing
le−o
rgan
ism p
roce
ssC
ell
Cel
l jun
ctio
nC
ell p
art
Extr
acel
lula
r mat
rixEx
trac
ellu
lar m
atrix
par
tEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
nEx
trac
ellu
lar r
egio
n pa
rtM
acro
mol
ecul
ar co
mpl
exM
embr
ane
Mem
bran
e par
tM
embr
ane−
enclo
sed
lum
enM
itoch
ondr
ion−
asso
ciat
ed ad
here
ns co
mpl
exN
ucle
oid
Org
anel
leO
rgan
elle
par
tSy
mpl
ast
Syna
pse
Syna
pse p
art
Virio
nVi
rion
part
D−a
lany
l car
rier a
ctiv
ityA
ntio
xida
nt ac
tivity
Bind
ing
Cata
lytic
activ
ityCh
anne
l reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Chem
oattr
acta
nt ac
tivity
Chem
orep
elle
nt ac
tivity
Elec
tron
carr
ier a
ctiv
ityEn
zym
e reg
ulat
or ac
tivity
Met
allo
chap
eron
e act
ivity
Mol
ecul
ar tr
ansd
ucer
activ
ityM
orph
ogen
activ
ityN
ucle
ic ac
id b
indi
ng tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityN
utrie
nt re
serv
oir a
ctiv
ityPr
otei
n bi
ndin
g tr
ansc
riptio
n fa
ctor
activ
ityPr
otei
n ta
gRe
cept
or ac
tivity
Rece
ptor
regu
lator
activ
itySt
ruct
ural
mol
ecul
e act
ivity
Tran
slatio
n re
gulat
or ac
tivity
Tran
spor
ter a
ctiv
ity
AllDeg
Perc
enta
ge o
f gen
es
0.1
1
10
100
Biological process Cellular component Molecular function
0
0
4
42
33
337
3373
33733
Gen
e num
ber
(d)
Figure 7: GO analysis of DE circRNAs. .e GO enrichment analysis of DE RNAs is represented by directed acyclic graph in (a), (b),and (c), and the GO terms and number are shown by histogram in (d).
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 9
Organismal systems−−agingOrganismal systems−−circulatory system
Organismal systems−−developmentOrganismal systems−−digestive system
Organismal systems−−endocrine systemOrganismal systems−−environmental adaptation
Organismal systems−−excretory systemOrganismal systems−−immune systemOrganismal systems−−nervous systemOrganismal systems−−sensory systemMetabolism−−amino acid metabolism
Metabolism−−biosynthesis of other secondary metabolitesMetabolism−−carbohydrate metabolism
Metabolism−−energy metabolismMetabolism−−glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
Metabolism−−lipid metabolismMetabolism−−metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
Metabolism−−metabolism of other amino acidsMetabolism−−metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides
Metabolism−−nucleotide metabolismMetabolism−−xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Human diseases−−cancersHuman diseases−−cardiovascular diseases
Human diseases−−drug resistanceHuman diseases−−endocrine and metabolic diseases
Human diseases−−immune diseasesHuman diseases−−infectious diseases
Human diseases−−neurodegenerative diseasesHuman diseases−−substance dependence
Genetic information processing−−folding, sorting and degradationGenetic information processing−−replication and repair
Genetic information processing−−transcriptionGenetic information processing−−translation
Environmental information processing−−membrane transportEnvironmental information processing−−signal transduction
Environmental information processing−−signaling molecules and interactionCellular processes−−cell growth and death
Cellular processes−−cell motilityCellular processes−−cellular community − eukaryotes
Cellular processes−−transport and catabolism
172537
1
4751
6522
16319
3852
2591
16279
7153
4401
301 53
3431
84 2
3181
4744
1772
8241
1923
1232156
15
7023
4522
8865
2771
186714
413 5364
849 10
2063
314 4
3904
14329
17
11114
12179
2681
11395
1090 11
Organismal systems−−agingOrganismal systems−−circulatory system
Organismal systems−−developmentOrganismal systems−−digestive system
Organismal systems−−endocrine systemOrganismal systems−−environmental adaptation
Organismal systems−−excretory systemOrganismal systems−−immune systemOrganismal systems−−nervous systemOrganismal systems−−sensory systemMetabolism−−amino acid metabolism
Metabolism−−biosynthesis of other secondary metabolitesMetabolism−−carbohydrate metabolism
Metabolism−−energy metabolismMetabolism−−glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
Metabolism−−lipid metabolismMetabolism−−metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
Metabolism−−metabolism of other amino acidsMetabolism−−metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides
Metabolism−−nucleotide metabolismMetabolism−−xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Human diseases−−cancersHuman diseases−−cardiovascular diseases
Human diseases−−drug resistanceHuman diseases−−endocrine and metabolic diseases
Human diseases−−immune diseasesHuman diseases−−infectious diseases
Human diseases−−neurodegenerative diseasesHuman diseases−−substance dependence
Genetic information processing−−folding, sorting and degradationGenetic information processing−−replication and repair
Genetic information processing−−transcriptionGenetic information processing−−translation
Environmental information processing−−membrane transportEnvironmental information processing−−signal transduction
Environmental information processing−−signaling molecules and interactionCellular processes−−cell growth and death
Cellular processes−−cell motilityCellular processes−−cellular community − eukaryotes
Cellular processes−−transport and catabolism
20100Percent of genes (%)
102268 1
285 1425
8721
327149
10221
528 4
587 2
288 110
355 1160
249388
215116
22
198 1
121 1
12762
289219
495317
12543
355282
468
169 1210
506144
17133
782 2596
208
562 2
7221
TypeAllDeg
TypeAllDeg
TypeAllDeg
TypeAllDeg
Organismal systems−−agingOrganismal systems−−circulatory system
Organismal systems−−developmentOrganismal systems−−digestive system
Organismal systems−−endocrine systemOrganismal systems−−environmental adaptation
Organismal systems−−excretory systemOrganismal systems−−immune systemOrganismal systems−−nervous systemOrganismal systems−−sensory systemMetabolism−−amino acid metabolism
Metabolism−−biosynthesis of other secondary metabolitesMetabolism−−carbohydrate metabolism
Metabolism−−energy metabolismMetabolism−−glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
Metabolism−−lipid metabolismMetabolism−−metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
Metabolism−−metabolism of other amino acidsMetabolism−−metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides
Metabolism−−nucleotide metabolismMetabolism−−xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Human diseases−−cancersHuman diseases−−cardiovascular diseases
Human diseases−−drug resistanceHuman diseases−−endocrine and metabolic diseases
Human diseases−−immune diseasesHuman diseases−−infectious diseases
Human diseases−−neurodegenerative diseasesHuman diseases−−substance dependence
Genetic information processing−−folding, sorting and degradationGenetic information processing−−replication and repair
Genetic information processing−−transcriptionGenetic information processing−−translation
Environmental information processing−−membrane transportEnvironmental information processing−−signal transduction
Environmental information processing−−signaling molecules and interactionCellular processes−−cell growth and death
Cellular processes−−cell motilityCellular processes−−cellular community − eukaryotes
Cellular processes−−transport and catabolism
250546
761555
18161
680 2328
2241 3
1158 2325
617 17
707124
475
479 2
205 1
161 160
366 186
2750 3536
774 1964
276
2947 3655
411 1
17201
617372
10771
131
3993 4476
1577
747 2
13671
2060
Organismal systems−−agingOrganismal systems−−circulatory system
Organismal systems−−developmentOrganismal systems−−digestive system
Organismal systems−−endocrine systemOrganismal systems−−environmental adaptation
Organismal systems−−excretory systemOrganismal systems−−immune systemOrganismal systems−−nervous systemOrganismal systems−−sensory systemMetabolism−−amino acid metabolism
Metabolism−−biosynthesis of other secondary metabolitesMetabolism−−carbohydrate metabolism
Metabolism−−energy metabolismMetabolism−−glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
Metabolism−−lipid metabolismMetabolism−−metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
Metabolism−−metabolism of other amino acidsMetabolism−−metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides
Metabolism−−nucleotide metabolismMetabolism−−xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Human diseases−−cancersHuman diseases−−cardiovascular diseases
Human diseases−−drug resistanceHuman diseases−−endocrine and metabolic diseases
Human diseases−−immune diseasesHuman diseases−−infectious diseases
Human diseases−−neurodegenerative diseasesHuman diseases−−substance dependence
Genetic information processing−−folding, sorting and degradationGenetic information processing−−replication and repair
Genetic information processing−−transcriptionGenetic information processing−−translation
Environmental information processing−−membrane transportEnvironmental information processing−−signal transduction
Environmental information processing−−signaling molecules and interactionCellular processes−−cell growth and death
Cellular processes−−cell motilityCellular processes−−cellular community − eukaryotes
Cellular processes−−transport and catabolism
3020100Percent of genes (%)
20 30100Percent of genes (%)
3020100Percent of genes (%)
676595
17061497
20561921
22271997
50684623
18151612
805711
52214495
30702722
17811320
15151364
4637
18261558
424315
14601274
18901668
1075890
441375
9984
11881048
486356
69196181
19381708
14821341
27442477
1031848
67025956
16601405
15461381
24222091
1005833
801664
18351445
317290
10514954
37263218
31432717
13981344
36983425
40573685
(a)
(b)
Figure 8: Continued.
10 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
is the lack of validation of the sensitive biomarker in pro-spective cohort study to confirm the specificity and sensitivityof this biomarker. Furthermore, the sensitive biomarker as-sociated with the pharmacological mechanism of XFZYC hasnot been tested in animal or cell study because of lack ofanimal or cell model of QS&BS pattern.
5. Conclusion
FZD8 may act as sensitive biomarker for predicting theeffectiveness of XFZYC. However, further prospective co-hort study was warranted to confirm the exact specificity andsensitivity of this biomarker.
Data Availability
.e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request.
Ethical Approval
.is nested case-control study was designed and conductedin accordance with the principle of Declaration of Helsinkiwith written informed consent from each participant. .eprotocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Com-mittee of Guang’anmen Hospital of China Academy ofChinese Medical Sciences (No. 2017-043-ky-01).
Conflicts of Interest
.e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this article.
Authors’ Contributions
Guang Chen, Haoqiang He, Kun Hu, and Jialiang Gaocontributed equally to this work. Jie Wang was the principal
(c)
Figure 8: (a) Enrichment analysis in KEGG pathways of DE mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, respectively. (b) .e lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network of DE RNAs. (c) .e circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network of DE RNAs. .e enrichedpathways and related gene number are shown in the histogram. .e miRNAs are marked in red, lncRNAs are marked in yellow, circRNAsare marked in green, and mRNAs are marked in blue.
Table 2: Real-time PCR results.
RNA name2− ΔCt (MD± SD)
P valueResponse Nonresponse
OR2L5 0.000217± 0.000279 0.000117± 0.000051 0.163CALN1 0.000110± 0.000153 0.000075± 0.000062 0.445IL3RA 0.000621± 0.000195 0.000678± 0.000204 0.448GALNT13 0.000138± 0.000196 0.000051± 0.000027 0.124FZD8 0.000191± 0.000147 0.000109± 0.000040 0.041SLC25A6 0.001081± 0.000770 0.000845± 0.000337 0.312PRR25 0.000054± 0.000042 0.000039± 0.000025 0.242circRNA_13799 0.000073± 0.000075 0.000031± 0.000020 0.040hsa-miR-4664-3p 0.000444± 0.000203 0.000499± 0.000168 0.438hsa-miR-190a-5p 0.000003± 0.000001 0.000003± 0.000001 0.979hsa-miR-3667-3p 0.000048± 0.000032 0.000049± 0.000018 0.945hsa-miR-1268b 0.007495± 0.002283 0.006612± 0.001168 0.214MD, mean difference; SD, standard deviation.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 11
investigator of this project and was responsible for theproject; Guang Chen contributed to the design of the studyand wrote the manuscript; Guang Chen, Haoqiang He, KunHu, and Jialiang Gao performed and conducted the study;Mei Han conducted the statistical design and analysis of thedata. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
.is study was supported by the Program of China Food andDrug Administration (Project no. 201207009).
Supplementary Materials
.e top 10 upregulated and top 10 downregulated DEmRNAs,miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs with the comparison ofCase1_before vs Case1_after, Control_before vs Control_after,and Case1_before vs Case2_before. (Supplementary Materials)
References
[1] Y. H. Wang and A. L. Xu, “Zheng: a systems biology apporachto diagnosis and treatments,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6216,pp. S13–S15, 2014.
[2] V. Scheid, “.e globalization of Chinese medicine,” Lancet,vol. 10, p. 354, 1999.
[3] G. Chen, J. Gao, H. He et al., “Identification of differentiallyexpressed non-coding RNAs and mRNAs involved in Qistagnation and blood stasis syndrome,” Experimental and6erapeutic Medicine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1206–1223, 2019.
[4] N. A. Listed, “ctDNA is a specific and sensitive biomarker inmultiple human cancers,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 4, no. 4,p. OF8, 2014.
[5] M. Guttman and J. L. Rinn, “Modular regulatory principles oflarge non-coding RNAs,” Nature, vol. 482, no. 7385,pp. 339–346, 2012.
[6] W. V. Gilbert, T. A. Bell, and C. Schaening, “Messenger RNAmodifications: form, distribution, and function,” Science,vol. 352, no. 6292, pp. 1408–1412, 2016.
[7] L. Salmena, L. Poliseno, Y. Tay, L. Kats, and P. P. Pandolfi, “AceRNA hypothesis: the rosetta stone of a hidden RNA lan-guage?,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 2011.
[8] D. W. .omson and M. E. Dinger, “Endogenous microRNAsponges: evidence and controversy,” Nature Reviews Genetics,vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 272–283, 2016.
[9] S. Memczak, M. Jens, A. Elefsinioti et al., “Circular RNAs are alarge class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency,” Nature,vol. 495, no. 7441, pp. 333–338, 2013.
[10] J. Liu, T. Liu, X. Wang, and H. Aili, “Circles reshaping theRNA world: from waste to treasure,” Molecular Cancer,vol. 16, no. 1, p. 58, 2017.
[11] J. Wang, J. L. Gao, G. Chen, and H.-Q. He, “Diagnosis scalefor Qi stagnation and blood stasis,” Chinese Journal of Ex-perimental Traditional Medical Formulae, vol. 24, no. 15,pp. 16–20, 2018.
[12] J. Wang, Y. An, Y. Q. He et al., “Patient reported outcome forQi stagnation and blood stasis,” Chinese Journal of Experi-mental Traditional Medical Formulae, vol. 24, no. 15,pp. 21–28, 2018.
[13] A. M. Bolger, M. Lohse, and B. Usadel, “Trimmomatic: aflexible trimmer for illumina sequence data,” Bioinformatics,vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 2114–2120, 2014.
[14] D. Kim, B. Langmead, and S. L. Salzberg, “HISAT: a fastspliced aligner with low memory requirements,” NatureMethods, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 357–360, 2015.
[15] M. Pertea, G. M. Pertea, C. M. Antonescu, T.-C. Chang,J. T. Mendell, and S. L. Salzberg, “StringTie enables improvedreconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads,”Nature Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 290–295, 2015.
[16] L. Kong, Y. Zhang, Z.-Q. Ye et al., “CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features andsupport vector machine,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35,no. 2, pp. W345–W349, 2007.
[17] A. Li, J. Zhang, and Z. Zhou, “PLEK: a tool for predicting longnon-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs based on an improvedk-mer scheme,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 311, 2014.
[18] L. Sun, H. Luo, D. Bu et al., “Utilizing sequence intrinsiccomposition to classify protein-coding and long non-codingtranscripts,”Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 17, p. e166, 2013.
[19] R. D. Finn, A. Bateman, J. Clements et al., “Pfam: the proteinfamilies database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. D1,pp. 222–230, 2014.
[20] S. Ghosh and C.-K. K. Chan, “Analysis of RNA-seq data usingtophat and cufflinks,” Plant Bioinformatics, vol. 1374,pp. 339–361, 2016.
[21] Y. Gao, J. Wang, and F. Zhao, “CIRI: an efficient and unbiasedalgorithm for de novo circular RNA identification,” GenomeBiology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 4, 2015.
[22] P. Glazar, P. Papavasileiou, and N. Rajewsky, “circBase: adatabase for circular RNAs,” RNA, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1666–1670, 2014.
[23] P. Ji, W. Wu, S. Chen et al., “Expanded expression landscapeand prioritization of circular RNAs in mammals,” Cell Re-ports, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3444–3460, 2019.
[24] M. I. Love, W. Huber, and S. Anders, “Moderated estimationof fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data withDESeq2,” Genome Biology, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 550, 2014.
[25] J. C. V. Oliveros, “An interactive tool for comparing lists withVenn’s diagrams,” 2007, https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html.
[26] T. D. Schmittgen and K. J. Livak, “Analyzing real-time PCRdata by the comparative CTmethod,” Nature Protocols, vol. 3,no. 6, pp. 1101–1108, 2008.
[27] T. Saitoh, M. Hirai, and M. Katoh, “Molecular cloning andcharacterization of human frizzled-8 gene on chromosome10p11.2,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 18, no. 5,pp. 991–996, 2001.
[28] T. Kondo, S. L. S. Ezzat, and S. L. Asa, “Pathogeneticmechanisms in thyroid follicular-cell neoplasia,” Nature Re-views Cancer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 292–306, 2006.
[29] H. Staiger, F. Machicao, F. Andreas, and H.-U. Haring,“Pathomechanisms of type 2 diabetes genes,” Endocrine Re-views, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 557–585, 2009.
[30] K. Saito-Diaz, T. W. Chen, W. Xiaoxi et al., “.e way Wntworks: components and mechanism,” Growth Factors, vol. 31,no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2013.
[31] N. F. Olde Loohuis, K. N. Nadif, J. C. Glennon et al., “.eschizophrenia risk gene MIR137 acts as a hippocampal genenetwork node orchestrating the expression of genes relevantto nervous system development and function,” Progress inNeuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 73,pp. 109–118, 2016.
[32] L. Song, M. Su, W. Shuiyun et al., “MiR-451 is decreased inhypertrophic cardiomyopathy and regulates autophagy bytargeting TSC1,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine,vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2266–2274, 2014.
12 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Stem Cells International
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Disease Markers
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2013
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
PPAR Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2018
Immunology ResearchHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Behavioural Neurology
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Parkinson’s Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary andAlternative Medicine
Volume 2018Hindawiwww.hindawi.com
Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com