Senegal: An IDEV Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy...

Independent Development Evaluation

From experience to knowledge... From knowledge to action... From action to impact

African Development Bank

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

January 2016

Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country

Strategy and Program

2004–2013Summary Report

IDEV conducts different types of evaluations — to achieve its

strategic objectives

Thematic Evaluations Project Cluster Evaluations

Regional Integration Stra

tegy

Evaluations

Project Perfo

rmance Evaluations

(Public Secto

r)Impact Evaluations

Project Performance Evaluations

(Private Sector)

Coun

try S

trate

gy E

valu

atio

n

Evaluation Syntheses

Corporate Evaluations

Sect

or E

valu

atio

ns

Coun

try

Stra

tegy

Eva

luat

ions

January 2016

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Independent Development Evaluation

From experience to knowledge... From knowledge to action... From action to impact

African Development Bank

Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country

Strategy and Program

2004–2013Summary Report

Acknowledgements

This report was prepared by Debazou Yantio, Evaluation Team Leader, and Mabarakissa Diomandé, Evaluation Officer, under the supervision of Samer Hachem, Division Manager. The broad guidelines were provided by Rakesh Nangia, Evaluator-General. It drew on sector evaluations conducted by Mrs. Cynthia Bleu-Lainé (Energy), and Messrs. Amadou Wade Diagne (Social Development), Alioune Diallo (Water and Sanitation), Mame Birame Diouf (Agriculture and Rural Development), Alain Rakotomavo (Transport Infrastructure) and Moctar Sow (Governance).

Mr. Harcel Nana, Junior Consultant, and Mrs. Wiem Bekir, interim, also respectively facilitated the preparation and quantitative analysis of the Bank portfolio's database, as well as the collection of relevant information on the operations concerned. Mrs. Imen Trabelsi, Mrs. Ruby Adzobu-Agyare, Mrs. Myrtha Diop and Mrs. Meriem Dridi from IDEV also provided the evaluation team with administrative support.

The evaluation team would like to thank the team from the Bank's Senegal Field Office (SNFO) which played a key role in the organization and conduct of the exercise under the leadership of Lamine N’Dongo, the Resident Representative, and also made relevant comments on the draft reports. Toussaint Houeninvo, Robert Eguida, Diery Gueye, Binta Diallo Diagne, Marie Claude Correa-Sarr and Ousseynou Ndiaye, in particular, provided wide-ranging assistance during missions to the country.

Internal and external peer reviewers made useful comments, which were taken into account in the finalization of the evaluation. The peer reviewers included Claudine Voyadzis, external, and Clément Banse, from IDEV.

The evaluation team wishes to express its gratitude to the Government of Senegal, to local elected officials and to all those who gave interviews and /or provided comments.

The publication of this report was coordinated by David Akana, Communications and Knowledge Management Specialist

IDEV is solely responsible for the contents of this report.

© 2016 African Development Bank Group All rights reserved – Published January 2016

Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report, January 2016

DisclaimerUnless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the various authors of the publication and are not necessarily those of the Management of the African Development Bank (the “Bank”) and the African Development Fund (the “Fund”), Boards of Directors, Boards of Governors or the countries they represent.Use of this publication is at the reader’s sole risk. The content of this publication is provided without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including without limitation warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non- infringement of third-party rights. The Bank specifically does not make any warranties or representations as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability or current validity of any information contained in the publication. Under no circumstances including, but not limited to, negligence, shall the Bank be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered which is claimed to result directly or indirectly from use of this publication or reliance on its content.This publication may contain advice, opinions, and statements of various information and content providers. The Bank does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness, reliability or current validity of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information or content provider or other person or entity. Reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, or other information shall also be at the reader’s own risk.

About the AfDBThe overarching objective of the African Development Bank Group is to spur sustainable economic development and social progress in its regional member countries (RMCs), thus contributing to poverty reduction. The Bank Group achieves this objective by mobilizing and allocating resources for investment in RMCs and providing policy advice and technical assistance to support development efforts.

About Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)The mission of Independent Development Evaluation at the AfDB is to enhance the development effectiveness of the institution in its regional member countries through independent and instrumental evaluations and partnerships for sharing knowledge.

Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)African Development Bank GroupAvenue Joseph Anoma 01 BP 1387, Abidjan 01 Côte d’IvoirePhone: +225 20 26 20 41Fax: +225 20 21 31 00E-mail: [email protected]

Design & layout: CRÉON – www.creondesign.net IDEV Layout and Design Task Manager: Felicia Avwontom Original language: French – Translation: AfDB Language Services Department

Acknowledgements iiAbbreviations and Acronyms vExecutive Summary 1Management’s Response 5

Introduction 14Evaluation Goal and Objectives 14Methodological Approach 15Limitations of the Evaluation 15

Country Context Between 2004 and 2013 16Country's Main Development Challenges between 2004 and 2013 16The Country's Development Strategy over the Period 17

Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013 19

Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs 25Relevance, Selectivity and Strategic Positioning 25Effectiveness 27Efficiency 31Sustainability 34Cross-Cutting Aspects 37Bank Performance 37Country Performance 40

Conclusions and Recommendations 43Annexes 47

Contents

Contents

List of figuresFigure1 Levels of Analysis (of Results) 14Figure 2 Theory of Change, 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper 20Figure 3 Theory of Change, 2005-2009 Country Strategy Paper 21Figure 4 Theory of Change, 2010-2015 Country Strategy Paper 22Figure 5 Project Distribution by Funding Window (commitments in UA) 23Figure 6 Project Distribution by Sector (commitments in UA) 23Figure 7 Access to Drinking Water and Sanitation in Senegal, 2004-2012 31

List of tablesTable 1 Performance Rating 25Table 2 Effectiveness Rating 27Table 3 Health Sector Outcome Indicators 32Table 4 Status of Elementary Education 32Table 5 Efficiency Rating 33Table 6 Sustainability Rating 35Table 7 Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Senegal 40

List of boxesBox 1 Sarya Locality is no longer isolated 28Box 2 Some institutions and structures established as part

of the good governance reforms 29Box 3 ASUFOR Federation: a Model for the Sustainability

of Water and Sanitation Infrastructure? 36

vAbbreviations and Acronyms

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACAB Budget Support Framework Arrangement

ACFA Accelerated Co-financing Facility for Africa

AfDB African Development Bank

ADEPME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development and Supervision Agency

ADF African Development Fund

AIBD Blaise Diagne International Airport

AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ANSD National Statistics and Demographic Agency

APIX Investment Promotion Agency

ASER Rural Electrification Agency of Senegal

ASUFOR Borehole Users’ Association

AWFF African Water Facility Special Fund

BNDE National Economic Development Bank (former FPE)

BOM Organization and Methods Office

BOS Operational Monitoring Bureau of Senegal Emerging Plan

BTOR Back-to-Office Report

CCPTF Technical and Financial Partners' Consultative Committee

CEDR Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results

CFAF Franc of the African Financial Community

CPE Country Program Evaluation

CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment

CRSE Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission

CRZ Zootechnical Research Centre

CSP Country Strategy Paper

CSPE Country Strategy and Program Evaluation

DCEF Department of Economic and Financial Cooperation

DCR Development Co-operation Report

DGF Directorate-General of Finance

DGID Directorate-General of Taxation and Government Property

DPEE Department of Forecasting and Economic Studies

DWSS Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation

ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States

FAK Kalounayes ASUFOR Federation

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

FAPA Fund for African Private Sector Assistance

FERA Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund

FPE Economic Promotion Fund

GAFSP Global Agriculture and Food Security Program

GDPRD Global Platform for Rural Development

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

IA Schools Inspectorate

ICT Information and Communication Technologies

IDEN National Education Departmental Inspectorate

IDEV Independent Development Evaluation

IEC Information Education Communication

IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development

IMF Intensified Mixed Farming

IMF International Monetary Fund

IPP Independent Power Producer

IPRR Implementation Progress and Results Report

IREF Regional Water and Forestry Inspectorate

IWRMAP Integrated Water Resources Management Action Plan

vi Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report

IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management

KWh Kilowatt-hour

LI Labour Intensive

LOLF Organic Law on Finance Laws

MDG Millennium Development Goal

MEFP Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Planning

MTR Mid-Term Review

OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

OFOR Rural Boreholes Board

ORQR Quality Assurance and Results Department

PACICE Inclusive Growth Support Project

PADERBA Anambe Rural Development Project

PADERCA Casamance Rural Development Project

PAIRF Revenue Offices Support Project

PAMOCA Land Registration Modernization Support Project

PAPEL Livestock Support Project

PAPIL Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Program

PAR Project Appraisal Report

PARE Economic Reform Support Program

PASRP Poverty Reduction Strategy Support Project

PCR Project Completion Report

PEPAM Millennium Drinking Water and Sanitation Program

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PNDL National Local Development Program

PNIR National Rural Infrastructure Program

PPC/PNDL Community Roads Program

PPC/PNIR Community Roads Program

PPP Public-Private Partnership

PPRR Portfolio Performance Review Report

PREFELAG Project for Restoration of Ecological and Economic Functions of Lake Guiers

PROGEBE Project for Sustainable Management of Endemic Ruminant Livestock

PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper

PSE Emerging Senegal Plan

RMF Results Measurement Framework

RUT Road User Tax

SAP Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing®

SENELEC National Electricity Company of Senegal

SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

SMTEF Sector Medium-Term Expenditure Framework

SNDES National Economic and Social Development Strategy

SNEEG National Gender Equality and Equity Strategy

SNFO Senegal Regional Office

SODAGRI Agricultural and Industrial Development Company of Senegal

SODEFITEX Textile Fibre Development Company

STI Sexually Transmitted Infections

TEU Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit

UA Unit of Account

USD United States Dollar

WAEMU West African Economic and Monetary Union

1Executive Summary

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Executive Summary

Evaluation Goal and MethodologyAs a key component of the Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results (CEDR), this evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, sustainability and efficiency of Bank Group assistance to Senegal over the period, as well as the institutional performances of the Borrower and the Bank between 2004 and 2013. The Government, civil society and the other actors concerned hope to learn lessons that will be reflected in the design and smooth implementation of the Bank's 2016-2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal. A summary report has been prepared on six evaluations conducted by independent consultants in each of the six priority sectors: (a) transport; (b) governance (multi-sector); (c) agriculture and rural development; (d) energy; (e) water and sanitation; and (f) social development (education and health). The data was collected from a documentary review, consultations with experts, and quick surveys on the intervention sites during which there were individual and group discussions, consultation workshops and direct observation.

Country Context and Development ChallengesThe most westerly point on Africa's Atlantic seaboard is located on the Cap-Vert Peninsula in Dakar, and this offers Senegal an opportunity to play a greater role in regional and international shipping. Dakar alone is home to 55% of the 13 million Senegalese, 51% of whom are women and 43.4% people under 15 years of age. Over the past ten years, real GDP has grown by 3-4% which is below the 7% target to take into account exponential population growth and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The number of poor people in the country has therefore been rising steadily since 2006. Senegal's economy faces the

following major challenges: high cost of labour; an institutional and regulatory framework with insufficient incentive (administrative red-tape, corruption); legal insecurity, especially in land ownership; lack of road, rail, port, energy, water and sanitation infrastructure; relatively little financing of local businesses by the national banking system; an economy over-focused on services; a structural current account deficit partly due to the fact that services are not easily exported and to imported inflation fueled by a combination of sluggish agricultural productivity and strong demand for food products. The economy is also exposed to external shocks, in particular, oil price fluctuations, the threat of locusts, irregular rainfall and frequent floods, which increase the vulnerability of agricultural production.

Bank Assistance Strategy and Program for the Country between 2004 and 2013Over the 2004-2013 period, the Government prepared several successive economic and financial programs which provided a basis for dialogue with the Bank. Three Country Strategy Papers (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015) were prepared on the basis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) I and II, the National Economic and Social Development Strategy (SNDES) and its update, and the Emerging Senegal Plan (PSE). Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank approved 32 operations, amounting to about UA 525.9 million, in six priority sectors or pillars: transport (38%), public sector or governance reform (20%), agriculture and rural development (15%), electric power (12%), water and sanitation (11%) and social development (4%) in women's and youth employment. Eight operations, completed or closed between 20091 and 2013, have been included in the evaluation to take into account all the results achieved by the Bank. The evaluation thus covers 40 operations

2 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report

in the 3 successive CSPs over the 2014-2013 period. Despite its declared intention in certain CSPs, the Bank has carried out little economic and sector work, but has focused on project preparation studies and environmental impact assessments.

Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs

RelevanceRelevance is fairly satisfactory. The Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, thanks mainly to the Results-Based CSP framework, the clarity of the government's priorities, and the practice of consultation including the private sector and non-State actors. However, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.

EffectivenessEffectiveness is fairly satisfactory. Sector performances are variable. Most of the objectives were achieved in terms of physical outputs. However, these outputs did not always produce the desired development outcomes. Despite difficult operating conditions, the transport infrastructure helped to improve urban mobility and cross-border trade, as well as develop local economies in rural areas. Public management reforms helped to establish good governance structures and institutions. However, implementation of the reforms remains erratic in some administrations. Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stockbreeders have increased sown areas and local production. Nevertheless, a general decline in yields has been observed. The water and sanitation facilities established have not helped to achieve the set objectives. The electric power generation and distribution initiatives have been implemented but operational difficulties, particularly outages, have prevented households and businesses from obtaining low-cost electric power. Classrooms

and health centres have been constructed, and health care and community supervisory personnel trained, but the structures have flaws.

EfficiencyEfficiency is fairly unsatisfactory. Cost overruns are almost systematic in the construction of health care facilities and are sources of dissatisfaction. The same applies to the energy sector where the slippage on start-up of the Sendou coal-fired power plant has resulted in significant additional costs despite lower unit and supervision costs. The poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project has affected the efficiency of the Bank's portfolio in the water and sanitation sector where the unit cost of drinking water supply is, however, at the midpoint level of performance by Senegal's other partners. Coordination and management costs represent on average 10.61% of the total cost of governance projects, below the reference standard of 13% for the other multilateral donors. Operations in the sector have not been seriously affected by delays due to the Bank's presence in Dakar, regular mobilization of counterpart funds, and responsiveness of actors in the MEFP whenever project implementation units (PIUs) are anchored in that Ministry. Similarly, the anchoring of PIUs in oversight structures and the involvement of decentralized service staff have facilitated implementation and contributed to savings through sharing of operating costs in agriculture and rural development. However, there is a time lag of 6 to 8 months between loan signature and effectiveness because of problems relating to non-fulfilment of the conditions precedent. Average project management costs are below the reference standard, with the exception of the Invasive Aquatic Weeds Control Project.

SustainabilitySustainability is fairly probable. Sustainability is fairly probable in the transport sector due to unpredictability of the State budget contribution to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund. In the

3Executive Summary

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

energy sector, the gradual reduction of government tariff compensation could help to achieve financial viability. Arrangements for ensuring maintenance of water and sanitation structures are inadequate. In the governance sector, reform measures are not applied comprehensively and thoroughly by the public administrations. In education and health, defects, design flaws and lack of training for staff in the use and maintenance of ultra-modern equipment makes sustainability of the facilities improbable.

Performance of Partners Bank performance is fairly satisfactory. Since the opening of its Regional Office in 2005, the Bank has intensified advisory services and technical assistance through more responsive direct contacts, facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-State actors, and helped the Government to adopt more efficient practices. It has contributed to the inclusion of disadvantaged groups, particularly women and youths, by creating jobs and new income-generating activity opportunities in priority sectors. However, the beneficiaries are often unaware of the Bank's achievements due to lack of communication. The Bank has supported the transition to green growth through climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The Bank has also established itself in its role as driver of private investment through PPPs. However, knowledge management is not yet systematic, and cumbersome procedures impact negatively on the Bank's performance.The performance of the Senegalese Government is fairly satisfactory. The country has clear strategic priorities, which have produced tangible results. However, difficulties relating to mobilization of counterpart funds, slippage on the fulfilment of the conditions precedent to the first disbursement, as well as start-up of activities have affected this performance. Aid coordination by the Government has been strengthened, and it consults non-State actors, particularly the private sector and civil society.

RecommendationsStrengthen the Bank's strategic positioning. Greater selectivity of intervention areas, based on adequate analytical studies, is recommended to allow the Bank to optimize its development outcomes. As regards transformation of local economies and poverty reduction, the Bank could, by targeting specific areas: (i) invest in the development of rural roads which will complement the main highways; as well as (ii) seize the existing opportunities for public-private partnerships (PPP) to increase its driver effect in the areas of energy, water and sanitation, agriculture and rural development. With respect to governance, deepening of ongoing reforms and support for more effective operation of facilities and institutions could have more significant impact and help the country tp make further progress, especially as regards the business environment.Ensure sustainability of infrastructure. For roads, in particular, one area for dialogue with the Government is the establishment of a mechanism that will ensure timely State budget contribution to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund to comply with the annual Road Maintenance Program. Furthermore, closer involvement of community-based organizations in the management of local infrastructure should be considered in the implementation of the Bank's procedures not only in terms of consultation but also of participation in management through the award of contracts.Improve effectiveness of project/program supervision through three complementary actions: (i) assist the Government in establishing an efficient national results-based monitoring/evaluation system which could also provide the Bank with reliable data on implementation performance and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision missions to cover all relevant aspects, including stricter monitoring of implementation of environmental management plans and quality control to prevent the numerous physical defects noted in some structures; and (iii) ensure compliance with the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.

Photo/ Présidence de la République du Sénégal

The Dakar-Diamniadio Highway services Diamniadio, which is a new development pole established by the Government to encourage private businesses to set up shop there. The travel time (between Dakar and Diamniadio) has dropped from 90 minutes in 2008 to 30 minutes in 2014.

5Management’s Response

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Management’s Response

Management received with satisfaction the outcome of the Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV) of Bank Group’s assistance in Senegal over the 2004-2013 period, and its contribution to the country’s development. The aim of the evaluation is to contribute to enhancing the Bank’s effectiveness and credibility. The report highlighted the need to emphasize infrastructure quality control and envisage suitable procurement procedures when rural communities are involved. It also stressed the importance of maintaining enough staffing in Field Office to match the size of the Bank’s portfolio in light of the Office’s regional coverage. Furthermore, the report pointed to the need to systematize the capitalisation and management of knowledge emanating from operations executed and to disseminate information on Bank achievements, especially in rural areas. The various conclusions and recommendations will be taken into account when preparing the Bank’s new assistance strategy in Senegal (2016-2020) and operations arising therefrom.

Introduction

The evaluation involved measuring the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of Bank operations over the 2004-2013 period. It also allowed for an assessment of the institutional performance of the Borrower and the Bank. The evaluation drew from past evaluations of the following six sectors: (i) transport; (ii) governance; (iii) agriculture and rural development; (iv) energy; (v) water and sanitation; and (vi) social development (education and health). The evaluation focused on three Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) – 2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015. This ex-post evaluation exercise enabled the Bank to draw lessons that were taken into consideration during the preparation of the new 2016-2020 CSP and in the selection of priority areas of intervention and future operations in Senegal.

Relevance

Management is pleased that the Bank successfully and satisfactorily aligned its intervention program on the Government’s development policy priorities

and on the expectations of the people and economic agents. The evaluation further states that the Bank’s assistance was designed to match the Government’s priorities that barely changed during the period, among which private sector development for accelerated growth, as well as deployment of infrastructure to open access to various basic economic and social services and reduce poverty. Further, the country strategies for the 2004-2013 period reflect the Bank’s operational priorities. It should be pointed out that in a bid to align its interventions with national development priorities, the 2010-2015 CSP mid-term review took into consideration the concerns of the new authorities that assumed office following the 2012 elections as well as the thrusts of the Ten-Year Strategy (2013-2022) adopted by the Bank in April 2013. This led the Bank to slightly modify the 2010-2015 CSP pillars.

Management shares IDEV’s view that in a bid to maintain flexibility, the principle of selectivity was not always followed.

Drawing lessons from this experience, the next CSP (2016-2020) will ensure selectivity in alignment


and flexibility. Hence, the CSP (2016-2020) will be aligned on the priorities of the National Development Strategy as defined in the Emerging Senegal Plan (Plan Sénégal emergent). It will reflect the priorities of the Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy as well as the five key institutional priorities (High Fives): feed Africa, light up and power Africa, industrialize Africa, integrate Africa and improve quality of life for the people of Africa. Selectivity of areas of intervention and complementarity with other development partners also figure prominently among other guiding principles of the new CSP (2016-2020).

Management acknowledges that the Bank’s strategic positioning should be coordinated more effectively.

The Bank was very active in the high level policy dialogue with the Government through the Extended Group of Technical and Financial Partners (G50), in line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Busan Partnership. The Bank served as spokesperson of TFPs vis-à-vis the political authorities. It co-chaired the G50 for two years with USAID and Belgium, respectively. The Bank is also active in several thematic groups. Specifically, it has since 2011 either chaired or been vice-chair of three such groups: chair of the ACAB Group (budget support) and co-chair of the Statistics Group with the United Nations Fund for Population Affairs (UNFPA). It led the Energy Thematic Group until end 2014, and participated actively in the auto-evaluation of aid coordination mechanisms, which was conducted when it co-chaired the G50.

It is worth noting that the partner landscape in Senegal has hardly evolved in recent years. Most international cooperation actors are "traditional" partners of the Development Aid Committee. The Bank actively coordinates aid with these actors. Therefore, in its interventions, the Bank has always favoured collaboration with other TFPs. In this regard, it co-financed such infrastructure as the Dakar-Diamniadio Highway, the Blaise Daigne

Airport, the OMGV Project, etc. In the case of the OMGV Project, it assumed the role of lead agency among the TFPs and brought the financing package to closure by taking charge of all components that other partners did not finance. The Bank also funds large infrastructure projects as the Government’s local partner, particularly in the case of public-private partnership projects.

Effectiveness

Management acknowledges that the objectives were achieved, even if some achievements did not always translate into development outcomes.

Management is pleased with the satisfactory results obtained in the transport sector and the fairly satisfactory results in “agriculture and rural development”, “social development” and “governance”. It welcomes the improvement of productivity at the Dakar Port thanks to the new container terminal completed in March 2012. In this connection, the major achievements concern the increase in the volume of container traffic which rose from 273,000 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units (TEU) in 2008 to 417,800 TEU in 2014, i.e. an 85% increase. Another gain pertains to the substantial reduction in the vessel-waiting times at the terminal from 15 hours to less than 2 hours, and the delivery or container-reception waiting time from 100 to 23 minutes. Also concerning the transport sector, the evaluation noted improvements in mobility in the Cap Vert peninsula brought about by the Dakar-Diamniadio Highway. Moreover, the said highway services Diamniadio, which is a new development pole established by the Government to encourage private businesses to set up shop there. The travel time (between Dakar and Diamniadio) has dropped from 90 minutes in 2008 to 30 minutes in 2014. The evaluation pointed out the improvement of connectivity between Dakar, the hinterland and neighbouring countries, thanks to the establishment of corridors and built and/or


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

rehabilitated roads. The corresponding time gain stands at 22.5 minutes per 10 km for light vehicles and 31.4 minutes per 10 km for trucks. On the rehabilitated earth roads, the speed has increased from 15 km/h to 60 km/h for light vehicles, and from 10 km/h to 50 km/h for trucks, i.e. a time gain of 30 and 48 minutes, respectively. Vehicle operating costs have dropped from 17 to 9% (deteriorated paved roads) and from 56 to 40% (deteriorated earth roads), thanks to the construction of new roads. Furthermore, the population’s wellbeing has improved, thanks to greater access to such basic social services as health education and healthcare, and the development of opportunities for income-generating activities.

The Bank will continue to prioritize transport development in the next CSP, with a view to the structural transformation of the economy, particularly through the development of agricultural value chains and trade in processed agricultural produce. This will help to consolidate the achievements of Bank interventions in the sector and create further economic opportunities through the development of the agricultural and industrial sectors. It will also contribute to improving the people’s living conditions, especially by offering them better access to basic social services and creating jobs.

With regard to public management and the business environment, Management appreciates the conclusions of the evaluation according to which the Bank’s assistance in this area helped to set up institutions and structures geared towards: (i) enhancing the effectiveness of public outfits that offer services to private enterprises; (ii) developing results-based public management; and (iii) increasing the participation of the private sector in the national economy.

Management is pleased with the positive impacts of its operations on improving Senegal’s governance performance, rated 3rd in West Africa and 9th on

the Continent, according to the Mo Ibrahim Index of African Governance. As concerns the business environment, Management is encouraged by the improvement of the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) rating from 3.9 in 2004 to 4.4 in 2013. The same applies to the decline in the cost and time of starting a business between 2004 and 2013 (43% fall in the cost of starting a business and a 90% drop in time required). Furthermore, between 2004 and 2012, foreign direct investment (FDI) increased from less than USD 64 million to USD 271 million, i.e. a 325% hike. In addition, the evaluation showed that the cadastral departments were equipped with adequate technical hardware; the timeframe for providing services to users was reduced; and property tax was consolidated. Management shares the view according to which more effort is needed, particularly in terms of accountability and citizen participation. Further progress should also be made to mobilize property tax.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of Bank interventions in agriculture and rural development activities were deemed moderately satisfactory. Management appreciates the fact that the evaluation highlighted an 86% increase in production, thanks to which local needs were covered for periods ranging from 5 to 8 months, or even 12 months in some cases. Management is pleased that the PADERCA Project allowed for the development of 14 100 ha of land compared to the 13 500 ha expected, i.e. a 104% achievement rate. This led to the production of 41 163 tonnes of cereal and 2 525 tonnes of vegetables for 2014 only, thus contributing to food security. Thanks to the improvement of livestock production systems, PROGEBE generated a total production of 1 776 000 litres of milk. PAPIL built more than 200 structures and other infrastructure in the Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack and Tambacounda regions. This infrastructure helped to reclaim 3 263 ha of salt flats and the rehabilitate 1 159 ha of land. Within the PPC/PNIR framework, more than 1 200 km of rural roads were built in 84 rural communities,


thus contributing to the improvement of the living conditions of more than 1 500 000 beneficiaries.

Within the context of the next CSP, the Bank will pursue its interventions in the agricultural and rural sector, with a view to contributing to transforming the country’s agriculture as part of the structural transformation of the economy that will lead Senegal towards economic emergence.

Management recognizes that more effort should be made to produce and supply electricity in Senegal at affordable prices. In 2011, the economic cost of outages was estimated at 1.4% of GDP. Management acknowledges the difficulties underscored by the evaluation in connection with the Rural Electrification Project where achievements were far below the objectives, as well as the delays recorded for works on the Sendou Coal Power Plant. Now that issues between Sendou’s major shareholders have been resolved, the plant would in time meet 45% of the annual electricity demand and reduce the actual cost of electricity by 20%.

Management has taken note that effectiveness in the water and sanitation sector was deemed unsatisfactory. This is mostly attributable to the poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project which reduced the efficiency of the water and sanitation portfolio, even though the drinking water supply unit cost is at the median of the performance grid of Senegal’s other partners. However, apart from this operation, subsequent Bank projects in the sector (PEPAM-I, PEPAM-II, PSEA) were more effective and today, the sector is among the best organized in Senegal. Between 2005 and 2015, the Bank helped to supply 20% of the target population with drinking water, i.e. 438 200 of the estimated 2 130 000 inhabitants. Management is of the view that huge sanitation needs persist and that the situation for the two basic services remains poor in rural areas.

The evaluation shows that in 2012, access to drinking water in the urban and rural areas stood

at approximately 90% and 60%, respectively. In terms of sanitation, access to improved facilities was above 65% in urban areas and reached 40% in rural areas in the same year. Management deems the results obtained encouraging. Ongoing and future operations should consolidate these achievements and strengthen access to water and sanitation. Management acknowledges the need to strengthen the sector. It is true that physical achievements in the sector have not translated into higher levels of access to drinking water and improved sanitation commensurate with expectations.

The Bank will pursue its interventions in the water and sanitation sector, rural electrification, rural roads and lighting of towns, in its drive to improve the people’s living conditions. This will be done through such integrated Government programs as the Emergency Community Development Program (PUDC) and the Towns Modernization Program (PROMOVIL).

Management notes that the evaluation rated the social development effectiveness as moderately satisfactory. It also notes the positive impact of its operations on improvement of healthcare coverage and access resulting from training, health staff sensitization and health infrastructure construction activities. Regarding education, which is another key human resource development component, Management appreciated the achievements made in the Bank’s area of intervention, for instance the increase in the gross enrolment rate, especially that of girls. Furthermore, most of the classrooms (98%) and related facilities have been built. Management agrees with the difficulties that the school construction program encountered.

Efficiency

Ratings of the various sectors show satisfactory efficiency in transport infrastructure and governance, and moderately satisfactory performance in


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

agriculture, rural development, water and sanitation. The efficiency was deemed moderately unsatisfactory in the energy sector and unsatisfactory in terms of social development.

Management shares the concerns highlighted by the evaluation, especially delays in executing projects in the energy sector and cost overruns in the construction of health infrastructure.

Management would like to share information on recent developments: the Rural Electrification Project was closed end-October 2015. Recovery of the part of the cancelled balance will help to finance new Bank operations in Senegal, especially PUDC. As regards the Sendou Coal Power Plant Project, it was restructured and the relevant funds disbursed in October 2015.

Management has made provision for a series of actions to speed up the implementation of its operations in Senegal. In this connection, project monitoring has been enhanced. Quarterly and annual portfolio review between the Bank, the Ministry of the Economy and Finance and the executing agencies are regularly organized to strengthen operations coordination and monitoring. Measures are also taken to guarantee the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.

The capacity of project staff is being built. To familiarize the staff of executing agencies and ministries with Bank rules and procedures (financial management, procurement and disbursement), individual supervision activities, in the form of coaching (on procurement and disbursement), were also conducted for project managers.

Concerning the timeframe for processing procurement files and disbursement requests, processing and approval of the relevant files is handled at SNFO in line with the Delegation of Authority matrix.

In terms of project financial management, the Bank has received all project audit reports for fiscal year 2013, which were due 30 June 2014.

However, to speed up the pace of project implementation, performance contracts were signed between the sector ministries and coordinators, on the one hand, and between the coordinator and other members of the project implementation team, on the other. Further efforts should be made to generalize the annual evaluation of these contracts.

Regarding project quality at entry, the average timeframe between approval and first disbursement dropped from 12.3 months in 2011 to approximately 6 months in 2015.

Still on the subject of project quality at entry, following the 2010-2015 CSP review in 2013, the preparation of approved projects gathered pace in earnest. These achievements will be strengthened within the framework of the next CSP. The Bank plans to finance a capacity building project to assist the Government in preparing projects and programs, and in monitoring/evaluation. Institutional support will concern other actors – local governments and non-state actors.

Sustainability

The evaluation has shown that the sustainability of achievements of the Bank’s intervention is moderately probable. Sustainability was deemed probable in agriculture, rural development and the energy sector. It was deemed moderately probable in the transport infrastructure sector, governance, drinking water and sanitation infrastructure. Lastly, sustainability was deemed improbable for social development. Management shares the evaluation’s view according to which,


even if the communities owned the achievements in a number of sectors, problems persist in terms of: (1) mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget; (2) poor operating conditions of the structures; and (3) training on the use of equipment. Effort should be made to strengthen the sustainability of outcomes in the next CSP.

Management is reassured by IDEV’s evaluation which notes that works financed by the Bank in infrastructure are overall well built, in line with the highest possible standards. It shares the concerns raised by the evaluation in connection with the poor operating conditions of the structures and the poor predictability of State budget contribution to road maintenance.

Regarding reforms (governance), the evaluation pointed out that the implementation of reforms by public departments guarantees their sustainability. It also highlighted the fact that public officers in charge of the reforms received training to build their technical capacity.

Management is satisfied with the results of the evaluation according to which project implementation units that are part and parcel of the administration constitute institutional frameworks for learning, disseminating and sustaining the results-based culture. This outcome is an additional guarantee of sustainability.

In future, Management will pursue the anchoring of projects within sector ministries and capacity building to strengthen the sustainability of its interventions. Furthermore, Management plans to support the mobilization of financial resources through public-private partnerships (PPP) to strengthen the sustainability of its interventions in Senegal.

Cross-Cutting Aspects

Gender. Management is encouraged by the outcomes of the evaluation according to which gender issues were mainstreamed in most operations. The progress noted includes the application of the law on parity, which allowed for the doubling of the percentage of women in the National Assembly in 2012 (43% compared to 22% before then). Progress has also been made in reforms related to the business climate and other support operations of the Bank.

Regional integration: Concerning regional integration, Management appreciates the evaluation outcomes according to which 3 transboundary corridors and works financed by the Bank helped to improve Senegal’s connectivity with its neighbours, notably The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali. This has contributed to increasing the volume of trade between Senegal and these countries. In addition, the Bank also provided support to accompany the domestication of WAEMU directives in the national legislation.

Environment. Regarding environmental management, Management is pleased with the outcomes of the evaluation which indicate that environmental impact assessments were systematically conducted, including for private sector operations. However, Management acknowledges that the implementation of the Environmental and Social Management Plan is behind schedule in a number of operations, especially the Blaise Diagne International Airport and the Sendou Coal Power Plant. It will take the necessary measures to avoid such situations in the next CSP.

Bank’s Performance

Management appreciates the outcomes according to which “the establishment of the Dakar regional


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

office as of 2005 intensified advisory and technical assistance services through more proactive direct contact and facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-state actors, and helped the Government to adopt more effective practices.” These outcomes were obtained thanks to joint quarterly reviews, joint annual reviews, more regular supervision, bi-monthly fiduciary clinics and individual coaching of managers of project implementation units. There were also formal bi-monthly monitoring of implementation of the Portfolio Improvement Plan.

As concerns inclusive growth, Management is satisfied with the results obtained. Among others, we take note of the more than 1 200 km of rural roads built in 84 rural communities under the PPC/PNIR Project. This project created opportunities for income-generating activities for the marginalized rural dwellers and increased women and children’s access to education and healthcare. Moreover, special mechanisms were used to include disadvantaged groups in several projects.

In connection with transition to green growth, Management appreciates the conclusions of the evaluation according to which the Bank’s efforts contributed to supporting climate-adaptation and climate-change-mitigation efforts in the agricultural sector, increased water control and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climate hazards and flooding.

Regarding knowledge management, Management welcomes the evaluation outcomes according to which the Bank conducted a large body of knowledge work (13 just between 2010 and 2015) which underpinned the preparation of its intervention strategies and guided its dialogue.

Country’s Performance

Management notes with satisfaction that Government’s efforts in the field of reforms and management of development outcomes enabled Senegal to obtain increased support and higher disbursements from TFPs. Official Development Assistance (ODA) rose from CFAF 479 billion in 2010 to CFAF 697 billion in 2012 (i.e. a 45% increase). Moreover, since 2012 the Government prepares annual reports on development cooperation, which includes the effective disbursements made by TFPs. In terms of consultation and accountability, the Government consults non-state actors once or twice yearly, especially stakeholders (public sector, private sector, civil society, broader public sector, TFPs) during presidential thematic discussions and annual cooperation reviews. Management acknowledges that weaknesses persist (delay in fulfilling conditions precedent to first disbursement, delay in submitting audit reports, delay and poor quality of works due to malfunction of procurement procedures, etc.). It would like to highlight the encouraging progress made by the Government in recent years. Thus, no delay was recorded in submitting audit reports due for 2015, compared to 33% delay in 2012. Also, there was a 50% reduction in the timeframe between approval and first disbursement, from 12.3 months to 6 months between 2012 and 2015. Furthermore, the timeframe for processing procurement files was reduced by 80%, from 15 days in 2011 to 3 days in 2015. Lastly, the portfolio contains no project at risk in 2015, compared to 10% in 2011.


Management has taken due note of lessons drawn from the evaluation conducted by IDEV. It agrees with most of the recommendations. The lessons and recommendations of this evaluation will be taken into consideration during formulation of the new Bank assistance strategy in Senegal (2016-2020) and all operations will be implemented within this framework.

Inventory of Measures Taken by Management

Recommendation Management’s response

Recommendation 1: Strengthen the Bank’s Strategic Positioning

Greater selectivity in areas of intervention based on adequate analytical work is recommended, to enable the Bank to maximize its development impacts.

Agreed: This recommendation will be taken into consideration in the CSP (2016-2020) being prepared.

Effort in terms of selectivity was made during the definition of the new CSP pillars. However, the CSP takes into consideration the 5 high institutional priorities (High Fives), the Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy and the Emerging Senegal Plan (PSE). Each of the 2 pillars retained has two focus areas:

❙ Pillar I entitled: “Support the structural transformation of the economy" focuses on the development of agricultural value chains and regional integration.

❙ Pillar II entitled “Improve the people’s living conditions” focuses on two areas: access to basic services; and job creation. The number of projects retained was considerably reduced, based on the longlist discussed with the Government. Preference will be given to large integrated and multisector operations.

Recommendation 2: Ensure Infrastructure Sustainability

Specifically for roads, a subject of dialogue with the Government concerns the establishment of a mechanism guaranteeing the timely contribution of the State budget to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund, to enable respect of the annual road maintenance program.

Agreed:This recommendation will be taken into account in the CSP (2016-2017) being prepared.

❙ Discussions on setting up a mechanism guaranteeing the timely contribution of the State to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund (FERA) will be a key dialogue issue in the next CSP. This is all the more recommended since Senegal has continuously improved its budget performance in the last decade.

❙ Moreover, as is being done under the PNDL, communities will be increasingly involved in infrastructure management

Recommendation 3: Increase the Effectiveness of Operations Supervision

Increase the effectiveness of operations supervision through three complementary actions: (i) help the Government to set up an effective results-based monitoring/evaluation mechanism that is also capable of supplying the Bank with reliable data on implementation performance and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision in a way that covers all relevant aspects, including more rigorous monitoring of the implementation of environmental management plans and quality control, to avoid several defects observed on some structures ; and (iii) ensure the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.

Agreed:This recommendation will be taken into consideration in the CSP (2016-2020) being prepared.

Management acknowledges that the monitoring/evaluation of public policies remains a challenge in Senegal. To overcome the challenge, the Government issued Decree 2015-679 establishing the harmonized framework for public policy monitoring/evaluation.

❙ The Bank was part of the Monitoring/Evaluation Thematic Group that dialogues with the Senegalese authorities on ways of institutionalizing results-based management in the Emerging Senegal Plan.

❙ Measures to strengthen monitoring/evaluation in Bank operations will be consolidated both for budget support and projects. Specifically, these include efforts in supervision missions and strengthening the SNFO team with financial management, procurement and disbursement experts who systematically participate in supervision missions. Measures to guarantee the implementation of supervision mission recommendations are also planned.

Photo/Presidency of Republic of Senegal

Senegal has a population of 12.8 million inhabitants, 51% of whom are women. As a result of the construction of the Kedougou-Moussala road, which passes through Saraya, the local economy is developing and women have greater opportunities for income-generating activities.


Introduction

As a key component of the Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results (CEDR), this evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, sustainability and efficiency of Bank Group assistance to Senegal over the period, as well as the institutional performances of the Borrower and the Bank between 2004 and 2013. The Government, civil society and the other actors concerned hope to learn lessons that will be reflected in the design and smooth implementation of the Bank's 2016–2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal.

After presenting the evaluation's objectives, this report first reviews the methodology, limitations, and the context of Senegal, as well as the main challenges and national development strategy.

Subsequently, the report describes the Bank's 2004–2013 assistance strategies for Senegal, presents the conclusions, and formulates recommendations for the various actors.

Evaluation Goal and Objectives

The evaluation was conducted in order to enhance the Bank's effectiveness and credibility. The evaluation objectives are to:

❙ assess the relevance, effectiveness and sustainability of the Bank's contribution to achieving the objectives defined in the 2004–2013 CSP, as well as the performances of the Borrower and Bank;

Country level

Pillar level

Project level

Means of action/Projects

National results

Intermediate outcome

Intermediate outcome

immediate outcome

immediate outcome

immediate outcome

Project 4Project 3Project 2Project 1

Figure1: Levels of Analysis (of Results)

Source: Authors

15Introduction

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

❙ analyze the efficiency and/or impact, where data is available;

❙ draw lessons relating to the design and implementation of the Bank's operations; and

❙ formulate recommendations in order to improve the Bank's future strategies.

Methodological Approach2

The operations implemented by the Government with Bank resources are the means of achieving the development objectives agreed upon between the two parties in the CSP. This evaluation focuses on a description of the results achieved in the Bank's strategies and programs in Senegal between 2004 and 2013, and the factors that contributed to, or hampered their achievement. The aim is not to establish specific direct cause-and-effect links between these results and the Bank's intervention.

The evaluation covered thirty-two (32) operations approved between 2004 and 2013 and eight (08) operations approved after 2000 but completed or closed between 2009 and 2013 in six priority sectors on the basis of the level of financial commitments (Figure 3).

The methodological approach adopted three dimensions: national, sector and project. This combined approach provides more opportunities for analyzing and understanding the results. It overcomes the difficulties caused by the lack of factual data required for a comprehensive analysis. The exercise was guided by a series of questions (Annex 2) formulated to meet the expectations of CEDR and IDEV internal practices relating to the preparation of country strategy and program evaluations. On the basis of these questions grouped together by evaluation criterion, indicators were defined or drawn from the CSPs, project appraisal reports, and the

Results Measurement Framework (RMF) prepared by the Bank's Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR) to measure the results obtained at each level of analysis. The criteria are: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability (Annex 2). In the special case of relevance, the evaluation took into account the selectivity of the Bank's choices and its strategic positioning. The evaluation was based on a scoring scale of 6 points per criterion3. For each sector, the performance rating corresponds to the average of all the project scores. The overall rating for the Bank's assistance strategies and programs over the period is the average of all the scores obtained in each sector.

For triangulation purposes, these indicators were updated with data gathered from several sources (country team, Government, local elected officers, civil society, private sector, project beneficiaries and development partners) and using different methods: documentary review, quick survey with questionnaire, semi-structured discussions, and direct observation. Within the limits of the available budget and timeframe, the sites visited and respondents were selected on the basis of geographical representativeness (country map in Annex 4), the project implementation status and their accessibility. Furthermore, two stakeholder consultative workshops were organized to take their expectations into account in the evaluation, ensure that the data collected reflect the actual situation, and encourage ownership of the results. The analysis is based on the theories of change of the different projects reconstituted from the data collected (Annex 3). Quality control was carried out by internal and external peer reviewers.

Limitations of the Evaluation

The main difficulties of the evaluation concerned availability of data on the outcomes of the Bank's strategies and programs. The team endeavoured to provide information on the evaluation criteria by triangulating data sources and collection methods.


Country Context Between 2004 and 2013

Between Dakar on the Cap-Vert Peninsula, Africa's most westerly point, and Mauritania to the North and East, Mali to the South-East, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau to the South, Senegal covers 196,722 km² administratively divided into 14 regions, 45 Departments, 117 arrondissements (administrative districts), 123 municipalities, 375 rural communities, and 14,400 villages. The Gambia forms an enclave within the country along the Gambia River. Senegal is a flat country with a hot tropical climate comprising a dry season from October to June, and a rainy season between July and September. The country has a population of 12.8 million inhabitants, 51% of whom are women. The population is very unevenly distributed. It is concentrated in the West and Centre. The East and North are sparsely populated. The average density rose from 55.8 to 71.8 inhabitants per km² between 2004 and 2013, and varies across the country: 400 inhabitants/km² in Dakar and 8 inhabitants/km² in Tambacounda. Urbanization is increasing with an urban population which now represents 43.1%, with the city of Dakar alone home to about 55%.

Senegal, which became independent in 1960, is one of Africa's most stable countries, despite insecurity in Casamance (south of the country) and the terrorist threat from neighbouring Mali. As regards the conflict in Casamance, a peace agreement was signed with the separatists in December 2004. An Amnesty Law was also promulgated, so also another law abolishing the death penalty. Despite this political stability, mention should be made of the high turnover of Ministers due to frequent cabinet reshuffle between 2000 and 2012. Since 2012, the country has been led by President Macky Sall who

came to office following a democratic change of political power.

Following the devaluation of the CFA franc in January 1994, growth revived in the Senegalese economy. Real GDP increased by 2.9% in 1994 and by an annual average of over 5% between 1995 and 2001. This trend continued until 2013, with the exception of a downturn observed in 2009 and 2010. These results were achieved against a backdrop of steadily narrowing public finance and balance of payment deficits and controlled inflation (PRSP 1, p. 2). The agriculture sector rebound, the expansion of electric power generation and chemical production capacities, as well as the buoyancy of the construction sector and recovery of public investment have been the main drivers of economic growth. However, the number of poor people has steadily risen since 2006, even though the proportion of people living below the poverty line had fallen to 46.7% in 2013. Poverty is more prevalent in rural areas than in urban centres. The AfDB statistics in Annex 8 show Senegal's socio-economic situation in comparison to the other countries.

Country's Main Development Challenges between 2004 and 2013

Senegal aims to become an emerging country by 2035. However, with an annual population growth of between 2.6% and 2.9%, the economic growth rates (between 4.9% and 1.7%) between 1995 and 2014 are below the target of 7% set to roll back poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The country faces a number of constraints4:

17Country Context Between 2004 and 2013

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

high cost of labour; an institutional and regulatory framework which provides insufficient incentive (administrative red-tape, corruption); legal insecurity, especially in land ownership; lack of road, rail, port, energy, water and sanitation infrastructure; relatively little financing of local enterprises by the national banking system; economic growth over-focused on services; a structural current account deficit partly due to the fact that services are not easily exported, as well as imported inflation fueled by a combination of sluggish agricultural productivity and strong demand for food products. Oil price fluctuations and vulnerability of agricultural production related to the threat of locusts, irregular rainfall and floods are all exogenous factors which also affect Senegal's economy.

The Country's Development Strategy over the Period

In order to address the above-mentioned challenges, the Government has prepared successive programs presented in PRSP I (2003-2005), PRSP II (2006-2010), SNDES (2013-2017), and PSE (2014-2018).

Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (2003-2005 PRSP I): With a view to reducing poverty, the main objectives are divided into four focus areas: (i) double income per capita by 2015 against a backdrop of strong, balanced and more evenly distributed growth; (ii) achieve widespread access to essential social services by accelerating the establishment of basic infrastructure to build human capital by 2010; (iii) eradicate all forms of exclusion within the country and achieve gender equality, especially in

primary and secondary education, by 2015; and (iv) implement a participatory and decentralized process for program management, implementation and monitoring-evaluation.

Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (2006-2010PRSP II): The strategy seeks to: (i) reduce the incidence of poverty in the population to below 30% by 2015, (ii) achieve a growth rate of at least 7% over the period, (iii) increase access to basic social services and strengthen food security, (iv) reduce inequalities and eradicate all forms of exclusion, and (v) promote good governance and the rule of law.

National Economic and Social Development Strategy (SNDES 2013-2017): The strategy aims to improve economic growth rates, smooth the impact of exogenous shocks while preserving future options and building resilience, as well as placing Senegal on a sustainable development pathway through: (i) economic emergence, (ii) optimization of the energy policy, (iii) adaptation to climate change, (iv) food security, and (v) peace and security.

Emerging Senegal Plan (2014-2018 PSE): The strategic guidelines are as follows: (i) transform the economy's structure to enable it support strong and sustainable growth momentum; (ii) expand access to social services and social security, as well as maintain the conditions of sustainable development; and (iii) meet the requirements of good governance through institution building and the promotion of peace, security and African integration.

Photo/Debazou Yantio

Regarding water and sanitation, this evaluation concludes that “the Bank's strategies and programs meet the needs of the population for access to drinking water and sanitation so as to improve their living conditions and achieve the government's objectives of improving urban and rural drinking water and sanitation access rates.”

19Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013

Most of the operations have been financed from ADF IX, ADF X, ADF XI, ADF XII and ADF XII resources. AfDB's private sector window resources have been mobilized, especially in the transport and energy sectors. The Trust Funds have also been used, particularly the African Water Facility (AWF) Special Fund, the Fund for African Private Sector Assistance (FAPA), the Special Relief Fund, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Accelerated Co-financing Facility for Africa (ACFA) and the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP).

Over the 2004-2013 period, the Government and the Bank negotiated and implemented three

successive CSPs: 2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015. Over these respective periods, the theories of change on which the strategies are based are simplified in Figures 2, 3 and 4 and the detailed logical frameworks are presented in Annexes 5, 6 and 7.

With regard to the non-lending portfolio, six economic and sector work (ESW) studies were planned between 2010 and 2015.

Figures 5 and 6 below present the portfolio's configuration by funding window and sector of operations.


Poverty reduction

Expe

cted

Out

com

esOp

erat

ion

Sustainable growth focused on private initiative

PillarsReducing vulnerability of agriculture and rural

development

Health Project II

UA 11.35 million

Education Project IV

UA 14.84 million

Improving the quality of human resources

Consolidation of the macroeconomic

framework

Local Small-Scale irrigation Support

Project UA 14.31 million

The livestock sector

development study

UC 0.79 million

Rural Electrification

Project

UA 9.58 million

Project to support the Directorale of Forecasting and

Statistics and the PRSP Monitoring

Unit

UA 1.55 million

Private Sector Adjustment

Support Program

UA 24 million

Figure 2: Theory of Change, 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Poverty reduction

Expe

cted

resu

ltsOp

erat

ion

Pillars

Sub-pillars

Improving access to socioeconomic infrastructure

Promoting good

governance

Capacity building

Enhancing the private

sector’s contribution to the GDP

Dakar-Diamniadio

highway

UA 45 million

Sendou coal-fired

power plant UA 48.59 million


Accelerated growth

2. Improving access to basic insfrastrure 1. Enhancing the business environment

Road maintenance project

UA 27.19 million

Rural drinking water supply and sanitation

UA 24.92 million

Kounoune thermal power plant project

6.40 million UC

Kita-Kati-Saraya-Kedougou multinational project (Dakar-Bamako)

UA 14.44 million

Multinational bridge construction in Rosso (Senegal-Mauritania)

Labé-Sériba-Tambacounda road project

UA 20.50 million

Ziguinchor sanitation master plan

UA 0.826 million

Implementation of the integrated water resources management Plan of action

(PAGIRE) in Senegal UA 1.396 million

Second rural water supply and sanitation sub-programme

UA 30 million

Dakar container terminal

UA 17.67 million

Project for the Modernization of the Cadastre

(PAMOCA)

UA 2.19 million

Private sector adjustment

support programme (PAASP II)

Poverty reduction strategy

support project

UA 30 million

Casamance reconstruction

integrated project

UA 20 million

Rumi-Sene sustainable

livestock management

project

UA 4.44 million


Pillars

Sub-Pillars

Contribution to strengthening national and regional infrastructure

Oper

atio

ns

Continued support to basic infrastructure

Collection and management of

Ziguinchor sewage sludge

0.11 UA million

Support to small-scale irrigation (additional

loan) project8.40 UA million

Support to inclusive growth

program (PACICE)25.54 UA million

VOLO Africa Trust

Information & Credit Bureau pilot program

0.18 UA million

Dakar Toll highway8.36 UA million Support to

economic reforms program (PARE)

27 UA million

Support the promotion of private

sector project (PAPSP)4.04 UA million

Blaise Diagne International Airport

61,85 UA million

Community feeder road programm (PPC/

PNDL II)15 UA million

Food security support project : Louga Matam

Kaffrine (PASA)28.03 UA million

Gambia Bridge3.180 UA million

Private sector loan1.24 UA million

Restoration of ecological functions

of Lake Guiers project (PREFELAG)

0.11 UA million

Intensify the development of economic infrastructure Support good

economic gov-ernance and the quality of public

services

Improve the investment climate and

enhance com-petitiveness

Support econom-ic diversification

and finance investment op-

portunities in the private sector

Business climate improvement and support framework for economic diversification

Support the promotion of youth

employment and women

project21.19 UA million



An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Figure 5: Project Distribution by Funding Window (commitments in UA)

AfDB27,42%

ADF60,88%

FAPA0,04%

Mixed11,09%

AWF0,44%

Special emergencyfund

0,12%

Source: AfDB Statistics, 2014

Figure 6: Project Distribution by Sector (commitments in UA)

Social4%

Energy12%

Transport38%

Water and Sanitation11%

Multisector20%

Agriculture0,44%

Source: AfDB Statistics, 2014

Photo/CERD

The Bank has supported climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The same has been done in irrigation schemes which have improved water management and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climatic hazards and floods.

25Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs

The results are presented in terms of evaluation criterion. For each criterion, the Bank's performances are reviewed in descending order of financial commitments (Figure 6).

Relevance, Selectivity and Strategic Positioning

The alignment was evaluated on the basis of, and analysis of the planning documents for the 2004-2013 period (PRSP 1, PRSP II and the SNDES), the CSPs (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015), and discussions with the actors.

In general, private sector development for accelerated growth and the establishment of infrastructure to provide access to the various basic economic and social services so as to reduce poverty remained at the core of the Senegalese Authorities' priorities between 2004 and 2013. The document analysis and discussions with the actors show that the design of the Bank's strategies and programs is guided by these priorities defined through a participatory process involving all development actors. Indeed, the sector Ministries propose policy letters which are consolidated at Prime Minister level, validated at the Presidency of the Republic, and then submitted to the Bank to enrich consultations involving non-State actors and the private sector.

Transport: Road transport is the main transport mode in Senegal. Over 95% of the transportation of people and 90% of freight transport is by road5. Roads to Dakar Port are saturated and communications with the country's interior and neighbouring countries are handicapped by obsolete road infrastructure which is little developed and in poor condition. In rural areas, the transport-related deficits affect the level of access to basic social services. Transport represented 5.3% and 6.3% of household budgets

Relevance is fairly satisfactory. All the Bank's strategies and programs are aligned with the priorities of the Government's development policies, the beneficiaries' requirements and the Bank's operational priorities. However, the Bank lacks selectivity, and its strategic positioning is not underpinned by a specific analysis.

Table 1: Performance Rating

Relevance-related aspects RatingAlignment with national and sector strategies Highly satisfactory

Selectivity Unsatisfactory

Strategic positioning Moderately Satisfactory

Overall Relevance Rating Moderately Satisfactory


in Dakar in 2005 and 20116 respectively. Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank's strategies and programs corresponded to the Government's policy (PRSP I, PRSP II and SNDES) which aims to improve the country's competitiveness, foster wealth creation by the private sector, and expand the population's access to basic social services. These strategies address the need for increased mobility of people and goods in previously remote rural communities, urban households and businesses in Dakar.7

Governance: The Bank's strategies and programs have focused on robust administrative and regulatory reforms of economic, financial and fiscal governance in the various public administrations. These reforms are: improvement of budget comprehensiveness and transparency through the enactment of the Organic Law on Finance laws; implementation of WAEMU budget classification standards; building of tax resource mobilization capacities, auditing of the civil service payroll, and establishment of the various good governance structures (Box 2). They are compliant with the Government's objective of accelerating wealth creation, and address the needs of public administrations in terms of the required economic and social information for decision-making.

Agriculture and Rural Development: The Bank's operations have aimed to reduce the impact of climate change, and build the resilience of rural communities. They mainly concern the intensification of production systems and improvement of productivity; irrigation schemes and structures, rural roads; smallholder structuring and professionalization, and agricultural extension (Annexes 2 and 3). They are closely aligned with national priorities (PRSP I and II, and SNDES). An analysis of the planning documents confirmed by discussions with those concerned has shown that these projects meet the beneficiaries' needs which are: (i) access to rural economic infrastructure; (ii) stronger technical capacities; and (iii) mitigation of the impacts of drought and sustainable resource management.

Energy: The electricity sector is marked by obsolete facilities, lack of investment, high cost prices, lack of access to electricity, and long and frequent power outages. The Bank's strategies and programs concern: rehabilitation and reinforcement of electric power generation, transmission and distribution facilities; increased hydro-power generation and supply; reduction in technical and non-technical losses; and construction of grid interconnections with neighbouring countries. They address the population's need for access to more affordable electricity and the challenges facing the government to create an enabling environment for development of the private sector, source of economic growth and poverty reduction in rural and urban areas8.

Water and Sanitation: The Bank's strategies and programs concern both urban and rural water supply and sanitation. The Bank's strategies and programs meet the needs of the population for access to drinking water and sanitation so as to improve their living conditions and achieve the government's objectives of improving urban and rural drinking water and sanitation access rates.

Social Development: The Bank's strategies and programs are focused on improving the quality of human resources through education and health. The strategies and programs are compliant with the Government's overarching objective of expanding access to essential social services by establishing basic infrastructure so as to strengthen human capital. The operations meet the needs of the population which are to: (i) improve the quality of education and health care, (ii) provide more infrastructure throughout the country, and (iii) reduce inter-regional and gender inequalities.

Alignment with Operational Priorities: A comparative analysis of the Bank's strategic framework documents for 2003-2007, 2008-2012 and 2013-2022, and the CSPs (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015) shows that


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

the latter reflect the Bank's operational priorities: governance and private sector development (public sector reforms), infrastructure, education, health, water and sanitation, energy, agriculture and rural development, gender, regional integration, inclusive growth and transition to green growth.

Complementarity between Bank operations: The document analysis shows that the operations were generally formulated to contribute to the achievement of the strategic objectives defined in the CSPs (see Figures 2, 3 and 4). There is also strong synergy between private and public sector operations. Indeed, the PPPs are accompanied by institutional reforms aimed at improving the business environment. The choice of the education and health inter-sectoral approach and the search for synergies with existing initiatives have helped to increase sustainability of the social development outputs. The Rural Roads Project (PPR) in the agriculture and rural development sector complements the National Local Development Project (PNDL) which concerns governance. Indeed, by linking agricultural production areas with markets, rural roads contribute to the development of local economies.

Selectivity: The evaluation did not reveal any selectivity by the Bank in the choice of operations. On the other hand, the persons contacted appreciated the Bank’s flexibility, particularly in the fact that the strategic priorities of the new President elected in

2012 were taken into account during the 2010-2015 cycle.

Strategic Positioning: The Bank identified Senegal's development partners and their intervention areas in the 2005-2009 CSP. However, the review of the CSPs, confirmed by discussions with the country team and MEFP task managers did not reveal any specific Bank response to the developing landscape of Senegal's partners.

Effectiveness

Transport: The new container terminal completed in March 2002 boosted the productivity of Dakar Port. Indeed, according to the 2010-2013 statistics of DP World Dakar, the volume of container traffic rose from 273,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU) in 2008 to 417,800 in 2014, i.e. 85% of the targeted objective. Ship waiting times at the terminal have been reduced from 15 to less than 2 hours; container delivery waiting times have fallen from 100

Effectiveness is fairly satisfactory. The sector performances are variable9. Most of the physical outputs have been achieved. However, these outputs have not always been translated into development outcomes.

Table 2: Effectiveness Rating

Sector RatingTransport Satisfactory

Governance Moderately Satisfactory

Agriculture and Rural Development Moderately Satisfactory

Energy Unsatisfactory

Water and Sanitation Unsatisfactory

Social Development Moderately Satisfactory

Overall Rating Moderately Satisfactory


to 23 minutes; the turnaround time for a container ship tug at the terminal estimated at 130 minutes in 2008 had dropped by 79% in 2013. The 6% increase in tariffs has been more than offset by the time-savings from which loaders now benefit.

The commissioning in August 2013 of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway has decongested the Cap-Vert Peninsula, which covers 0.28% of the national territory and is home to 25% of the country's population, 95% of formal sector enterprises, 80% of non-agricultural informal sector production units, and 87% of full-time jobs10. It serves the new Diamniadio development hub established by the Government to attract private enterprises. Travel time was reduced from 90 to 30 minutes between 2008 and 2014. However, its financial rate of return is insufficient because of a shortfall of about 50% in heavy duty vehicle traffic11.

Dakar's connectivity with the interior of the country and neighbouring countries has been improved by corridors and roads that have been constructed or rehabilitated. 345 km of paved roads and 464 km of earth roads have been improved, including related structures (8 boreholes, 2 health huts, 2 markets, 7 school enclosures and 2 parking areas for heavy duty vehicles). On the rehabilitated paved roads, the average speed has increased from 20 km/h before the works to 80 for light vehicles, and from 15 to 70 km per hour for heavy duty vehicles12. The

corresponding reduction in travel time per 10 km is 22.5 mins for light vehicles and 31.4 mins for trucks. On the rehabilitated earth roads, the speed has increased from 15 to 60 km/h for light vehicles and 10 to 50 km/h for trucks, with respective time savings of 30 and 48 mn. Vehicle operating costs have fallen from 17% to 9% (degraded paved roads) and from 56% to 40% (degraded earth roads) as a result of the construction of new roads. In addition, the persons contacted reported greater access to basic socio-economic services (Box 1).

Governance: In public management and business environment, the Bank has contributed to the establishment of institutions and structures (Box 2) aimed at: (i) enhancing the efficiency of public administrations providing services to private enterprises, (ii) developing results-based public management, and (iii) improving private sector participation in the national economy.

With regard to public administration efficiency, the cadastral services have been equipped with adequate technical materials; user servicing times have been reduced, the duration of preliminary designs of major works have been shortened because of availability of maps provided by PAMOCA. The cost and time required to start a business fell sharply between 2004 and 2013, by 43% and 90% respectively13. However, land tax yields are inadequate because the tax services do not yet use the cadastral survey data

Transfer to Saraya was considered by civil servants as a disciplinary assignment because of the locality's inaccessibility. In order for their salaries to be paid in Kedougou (former Prefecture headquarters), it was necessary to wait 2 to 3 days for a public transport vehicle for a 3 hour journey. As a result of the construction of the Kedougou-Moussala road, which passes through Saraya, transfer to Saraya is no longer considered as a punishment for it now takes only 30 mn to reach Kedougou. The journey to Moussala (51 km from Mali) takes 38 mn instead of one day. As a result, the local economy is developing: women have greater opportunities for income-generating activities from the new traveler and trucker clientele passing through, and one micro-credit agency has opened and others are expected to follow.

Source: Survey Data, April 2014

Box 1: Sarya Locality is no longer isolated


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

of 60,000 plots in Dakar nor the mapping resources relating to the country's 76 localities. Indeed, MEFP structures are generally compartmentalized and do not collaborate easily, resulting in conflicts of competence.

As regards results-based public management, Bank support has helped to build institutional capacities for monitoring economic and social policies and the production of data on the socio-economic situation. However, the monitoring-evaluation system is fragmented, and evaluation activities are still disparate.

Overall, the country improved its performance between 2004 and 201314. Indeed, Senegal is now ranked 3rd in West Africa and 9th for the entire continent by the 2014 Mo Ibrahim Index, which assesses the quality of governance for each African country. According to Bank statistics, private sector activity has been very buoyant as reflected in the exponential increase of 191% in the volume of credit granted to private enterprises by the country's banks between 2004 and 2013. The percentage of public contracts awarded to SMEs rose from 20% in 2008 to 30% in 2014. Foreign direct investment rose from under US$ 64 million to over US$ 271 million between 2004 and 2012, representing a 325% increase. Over the same period,

tax revenue increased by 70%. Though great strides have been made, as mentioned above, Senegal's score in the “Doing Business” ranking (48.57 for a ranking in 153rd position out of 189 countries) remains below the average for South-Saharan Africa (49.66, average ranking 143)15 suggesting that there is room for deepening and consolidating reforms.

Agriculture and Rural Development: In the PAPIL areas concerned, sown areas have increased by 73% and production by 86%, which has helped to cover local needs for between 5 and 8, or 3 months in some places. Market garden production has also increased steadily, and currently stands at about 3,558 tonnes16. Under the PADERCA, about 14,100 ha of land were developed compared to initial estimates of 13,500 ha. This resulted in the production of 41,163 tonnes of cereals in 2014 and 3,525 tonnes of vegetables up to 2014 in the market garden plots. Under the PROGEBE, dairy production in 2014 increased by 269,000 litres compared to estimates of 136,400 litres in 2011. As a result of artificial insemination and sensitization under PAPEL II, 2 522 intensified mixed farms (IMF) for cattle and 1,113 IMF for sheep (3,023 fattened sheep and 3,008 breeding sheep) were established. Stockbreeders considered this project a blessing after the winding up of SODESP.

❙ Organic Law on Finance Laws (LOLF)

❙ Ensuring compliance of the governance system with several WAEMU standards

❙ Economic Policy Coordination and Monitoring Unit

❙ Operational Monitoring Bureau (BOS) of the Senegal Emerging Plan

❙ Organization and Methods Office (BOM)

❙ National Statistics and Demographic Agency (ANSD)

❙ Department of Forecasts and Economic Studies (DPEE)

❙ Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development and Supervision Agency (ADEPME)

❙ Public procurement funds to provide guarantees to SMEs.

Source: Survey Data, March 2014

Box 2: Some institutions and structures established as part of the good governance reforms


Despite the delays, about 200 structures and other infrastructure have been completed under the PAPIL17 in Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack, and Tambacounda. These facilities have helped to recover 3,263 ha of salty land, restore 1,159 hectares of land, reforest 1,083 hectares of land, regenerate 90.75 ha of mangrove swamps, and protect 4 out of 5 island sites, with respective implementation rates of 109%, 208%, 169%, 363%, and 80%. In the Anambé basin, 3279 ha were sown in 2009 compared to initial estimates of 4,180 ha, with an intensification rate of 78%. A general reduction in yields of between 5 to 25% was recorded in the northern limits of the groundnut basin in Kaolack region18. According to the beneficiaries, implementation of the PADERBA has been a failure due to conflicts with the SODAGRI Directorate-General and the successive resignation of six project coordinators. Under the PPC/PNIR, over 1,200 kilometres of rural roads were constructed in 84 rural communities, resulting in an improvement of the living conditions of over 1,500,000 beneficiaries.

Energy: The rural electrification project has slowly connected to the national grid 118 out of the 275 targeted villages in the intervention area19, i.e. 43% implementation rate, which is far below the sector objective of 60% by 2016. With a two-year delay, the 125 MW coal-fired power plant in Sendou is 95% complete. Although the operation of the Kounoune diesel-fired thermal plant has helped to reduce supply shortage by generating 395.3 GWh of electric power in the interconnected grid in 2013, the duration and frequency of power outages have increased. Indeed, the cumulative annual duration of outages rose from 588 in 2010 to 915 in 2011. Similarly, their frequency rose from 350 in 2012 to 369 in 201320. In 2011, the estimated economic cost of outages was 1.4% of GDP21. In 2009, the average price of electricity in Senegal was CFAF 115/kWh. It was CFAF 117.96/kWh, CFAF 117.80/kWh, and CFAF 114/kWh in 2011, 2012 and 2013

respectively. The unit cost also gradually fell from CFAF 96.43/KWh in 2012 to CFAF 86.24/kWh in 2013, then to CFAF 83.24 /KWh in 2014.

Water and Sanitation: The objectives set for 201522 were to achieve drinking water access rates of 100% and 82% in urban and rural areas; and 78% and 20% for sanitation in urban and rural areas respectively. In urban areas, the sanitation access rate stands at 35.6% and the drinking water access rate at 81.2%. (PSEA, February 2014). The physical outputs are not reflected in levels of access to drinking water and sanitation to meet these expectations (Figure 7). The Bank has helped to provide 20% of the target population with drinking water, i.e. 438,200 inhabitants out of the estimated 2,130,000 between 2005 and 2015. Figure 7 also shows that: (i) sanitation requirements remain enormous, and (ii) in rural areas, the situation is poor for both basic services.

Social Development: The regional health system is now coherently organized with improved performance, particularly health care coverage and access, the quality of care, reduced morbidity and mortality rates due to reproductive health problems, childhood diseases, and STI/HIV/AIDS. About 732,000 of the 1,220,000 targeted women have been sensitized on priority health themes (HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal and child health, establishment and management of health insurance companies); health personnel have been trained: 4 doctors, including one woman specialized in gynecology, 60 midwives trained in ultrasound, 3 civil and biomedical engineers including 1 woman, 12 teams trained in emergency obstetric care including 6 women (2 doctors and 4 nurses), 150 health workers in instrumentation, biology, anesthesia-intensive care and reproductive health: 950,000 community health care providers trained, 55% of whom were women, 83 neighbourhood mothers' and godmothers' committees established and


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

31 health action plans implemented, 65% of which will benefit women. All the planned infrastructure has been completed: 14 health posts, 2 referral health centres, 1 regional hospital, 1 regional blood transfusion centre, 1 voluntary and anonymous HIV/AIDS screening centre, 1 regional training centre, 1 regional pharmacy and regional administrative services constructed and equipped.

A similar situation exists in education where progress has been made: pupils' performances have improved and the gross enrolment ratio, especially for girls in the project area, have increased. In primary education, the results concerning access, quality and financing have exceeded expectations, as indicated in the Table below. The project has completed 98% of the construction work on classrooms and related equipment (semi-modern latrines, water points, teaching aids, and libraries), training sessions for education personnel (teachers, inspectors, IA and IDEN managers, heads of establishments, school heads) and sensitization for higher girls’ enrolment.

However, there have been implementation difficulties, especially the repeated replacement of the Education Project IV Coordinator, deficiencies of the procurement procedure, and weakness of works contractors; incomplete structures or structures completed with major defects; a two-year delay, additional costs, equipment not adapted to the physically impaired, and inappropriate construction sites (flood-prone land). These problems have affected quality and led to the suspension of disbursements. Implementation of the recommendations of supervision missions, often repeated from one mission to another, would have prevented these anomalies.

Efficiency

Transport: While average costs vary from country to country and from one structure to another, the costs of roads financed are far below the costs observed in other countries. In the case of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway, the average cost is €13.6 million/km,

Figure 7: Access to Drinking Water and Sanitation in Senegal, 2004-2012

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Total population with access to drinking water sources (%)

Population with access to drinking water sources (%) in rural areas

Population with access to drinking water sources (%) in urban areasTotal population with access to improved sanitation (%)Total population with access to improved sanitation (%) in rural areasTotal population with access to improved sanitation (%) in urban areas

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Source: African Development Bank Statistics, 2014


exclusive of taxes and costs of compensation and clearing the right-of-way. This cost is €5 million in

Denmark and €19.2 million in the United Kingdom23. For the country's rehabilitated paved roads, the average cost per km is US$ 148,483 which compares with USD 299,55124 observed throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, corresponding to savings of 50%. Overall, there have been no works delays and no mobilization of supplementary resources except for the Tambacounda to Medina-Gounass road, which is seven months behind schedule.

Table 3: Health Sector Outcome Indicators

Outcome Indicators Baseline Value (2005 DHS)

2011

Percentage of deliveries performed in a health facility

Fatick 49% 65.4%

Tambacounda 34.7 45.1%

Kaolack 44.8 65.7%

Matam 47.1 54.1%

Immunization coverage of 12 to 23 months old children

Fatick 62.2 70.2%


Kaolack 56.2 65.7%

Matam 40.7 52.8

Reduction in morbidity and morbidity due to malaria and other major diseases*

Fatick 33.8 87.6%


Kaolack 33.7 80%

Matam 72.2 92.2%*Indicator adopted (proxy): Availability of at least one mosquito net per household

Source: Health Project II Completion Report PCR), 2013

Table 4: Status of Elementary Education

Components Indicators Baseline(2000)

Situation2011

2013

Access Gross enrolment rate for introductory courses 85.1% 110.3% 108.9%

Gross enrolment rate 67.2% 95.9% 95.3%

Gender Parity Index for the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)

96.4% 102.7% 112%

Pupils/teacher ratio in public primary education 48.5% 40 % ..

Quality Overall primary education completion rate 38.6% 70.4% 65.9%

Primary education repeater rate 12.4% 6.8% 2.8%

Drop-out rate 10.3% (in 2004) 6.3% 9.8%

Governance Share of elementary education in current spending on education

44.6% (in 2007) 47.1% 43.94%

Source: National reports on the status of education from 2000 to 2011 and SimulPDEF Phase 3.

Efficiency is fairly unsatisfactory mainly as a result of slippage on implementation and cost overruns or underruns.


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Governance: The average project management cost, in relation to the total cost, is below the reference standards, especially those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Bank (WB (IFAD, 201425). The average unit cost of outputs produced in the different projects analyzed is UA 1,019,273. The comparative average cost of outputs is lower for the PADPS Project than for the PAMOCA Project. The average project management cost is UA 354,226 representing 10.61% of the total average cost of projects. Only the PAPSP has a proportion of management costs in relation to the total cost above the IFAD standard (13%). Figure 8 below presents the average management cost of the portfolio projects.

The operations have not been much affected by delays. The opening of the Regional Office in Dakar has helped to enhance efficiency by shortening the time taken to process documents and issue no objection opinions (NOO) from the Bank and improving the responsiveness of DCEF and the actors concerned in the Senegalese public administration. Furthermore, mobilization of the government counterpart funds has been regular and satisfactory for PIUs anchored in the MEFP. On the other hand, the counterpart funds for the PPC, whose PIU is anchored in the Ministry responsible for Local Development, was disbursed behind schedule in 2014 and 2015.

Agriculture and Local Development: Implementation of the operations was facilitated by anchoring the PIUs in the structures of the oversight Ministries and involving the employees of their decentralized services. The projects also have procedures manuals which clearly define the budget procedures, management of purchases and fixed assets, cash flow and personnel management, and the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders. However, some delays have been observed. Overall, a 6-to-18 month delay has been noted between signature and effectiveness of operations in the sector, mainly due to problems relating to non-fulfilment of conditions precedent (recruitment of the implementation team and submission of the environmental management plan). Implementation was also affected by other types of delays, especially in the award of contracts for studies, which adversely affected the implementation of certain works and the suspension of disbursements for ineligible expenditures revealed in the audit reports. Unrealistic planning of the implementation of the participatory process lengthened the implementation periods. With regard to costs, the anchoring of the Community Roads Project (PPC) in the implementation structure for the National Rural Infrastructure Program (PNIR) made it possible to pool operating costs. Only additional costs were covered: individual consultant responsible for assisting the PNIR Coordinator in implementing the

Table 5: Efficiency Rating

Sector RatingTransport Satisfactory

Governance Satisfactory

Agriculture and Rural Development Moderately Satisfactory

Energy Moderately Satisfactory

Water and Sanitation Moderately Satisfactory

Social Development Unsatisfactory

Overall Rating Moderately Satisfactory


additional tasks relating to the projects, sharing of the accounting system and administrative capacities for the supervision of activities in the field. Indeed, coordination costs represented 1.4% of the total project cost compared to 7.2% for the Louga, Matam and Kaffrine Food Security Project (PASA) and 24.5% for Invasive aquatic weed control project.

Energy: The delay in commissioning the Sendou coal-fired power plant resulted in estimated additional costs of CFAF 50 billion between 2011 and 2013, i.e. almost 60% of the 2011-2013 tariff compensation and 60% of the investment cost26. The average price and unit cost fell gradually between 2009 and 2014. Between 2010 and 2011, the annual duration of outages increased by 55.6%; between 2012 and 2013, the frequency of outages and electricity capacity increased by 5.4% and 652.9% respectively. Power outages have seriously affected the population's living and working conditions, as well as growth, and their economic cost was estimated by the Authorities at about 1.4% of GDP in 201127.

Water and Sanitation: According to the Department of Water Management, the cost of supplying one person with drinking water was about CFAF 35,675 for the PEPAM I project compared to CFAF 30 000 to 40 000 for projects financed by Luxemburg and the World Bank. Despite PAGIRE's geographical expansion, the project objectives were achieved at a lower than estimated cost because of savings made on studies and the procurement of transport equipment. On the other hand, the Dakar Sanitation Project (PAVD) has an unsatisfactory rate of return due to insufficient physical outputs and inefficient treatment and upgrading procedures. Indeed, out of two new units each with a treatment capacity of 10,000 m3/day of wastewater (i.e. a total of 20,000 m3/day), the project only constructed one incomplete unit (without a sludge treatment process) with a treatment capacity of 11,300 m3/day. For a

few years, the structures have been affected by an increased flow rate, sand silting of the sand blasters, unstable pre-treatment because of extremely advanced wear and tear, flooding of the sludge digestion system, and recurrent breakdowns of the hydraulic and electronic equipment procured28. The PAVD implementation unit was finally established in May 2004, over two years (28 months) behind schedule, because of administrative delays. With regard to the PAGIRE, the effectiveness of the new procurement procedure and the long document processing period delayed start-up of activities and delivery of outputs.

Social Development: The evaluation shows that unit costs were generally under-estimated. This resulted in financing gaps and revisions of lists of goods and services. In 2007, The Bank suspended disbursements for the Health Project II because of delays in the fulfilment of conditions precedent to the first disbursement and in implementing the final technical and geotechnical designs of the sites29.

Sustainability

Transport: Sustainability depends on three key factors: quality of the structure, operating conditions, and maintenance. Overall, direct observation indicates that the structures are well constructed. However, because of poor operating conditions, early degradation has been noted

Sustainability is fairly probable. The communities have assumed ownership of the assets in certain sectors. However, there are still problems regarding mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget, as well as poor operating conditions of the structures and training on the use of equipment.


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

between Kedougou and Moussala on the Dakar-Bamako corridor, as well as pavement deformation on the Dakar-Diamniadio road and cracks on the Rufisque BPV parking area. Despite sensitization of owners and drivers of heavy duty vehicles, axle overloading is frequent on roads throughout the country. Its annual cost is estimated at CFAF 35 billion30, which exceeded the CFAF 34 billion road maintenance budget in 2014. The smooth implementation of the annual road maintenance program could help to resolve these problems, but its completion is uncertain as it depends on the contribution of the State Budget (7 billion in 2014) to the resources of the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund (FERA). This contribution cannot be mobilized within the appropriate time frame because of the single Treasury account principle and the length of the invoice payment procedure. The FERA budget execution rate is low (67% in 2014). However, the contractual obligation of road concessionaires to restore the infrastructure to good condition upon expiry of the concession could safeguard the road assets operated under concession, which does not concern the other categories of transport infrastructure.

Governance: The reforms presented above are implemented by Senegalese professionals of the established and/or restructured public administration, which is a guarantee for sustainability given the experience they acquire. In this respect, PIUs in the

administration constitute frameworks for institutional learning, as well as dissemination and sustainability of the results-based management culture. The staff involved have received specific training in order to build their skills and ensure continuation of reforms. The sustainability of institutional reforms is not guaranteed particularly for PIUs not anchored in the MEFP because of difficulties in mobilizing counterpart funds. Furthermore, lack of coordination between the established structures (see Box 2) also undermines the sustainability of the reforms.

Agriculture and Rural Development: Continuing maintenance of the established infrastructure is a core concern in agriculture sector project design. Indeed, irrigation infrastructure projects have established mechanisms to recover maintenance and replacement costs. The target groups have been provided with specific training to ensure a smooth handover, through a high degree of community participation in project design and implementation. In addition, since their start-up, projects have also relied on decentralized government services (CRZ, IREF, SODEFITEX, etc.), the operational capacities of which have been enhanced to encourage ownership and sustainability of the assets. Moreover, the option of entrusting project implementation to structures of the oversight Ministry has helped to improve interface in the processing of documents and communication, and this is likely to improve the viability of activities. However, community-based organizations experience

Table 6: Sustainability Rating

Sector RatingTransport Fairly probable

Governance Fairly probable

Agriculture and Rural Development Probable

Energy Probable

Water and Sanitation Fairly probable

Social Development Improbable

Overall Rating Fairly probable


difficulty in fulfilling the conditions for participation in the Bank's procurement procedures.

Energy: The roles and responsibilities of each operator in the sector were clarified under the new regulatory framework outlined in Law No. 98-29 of 14 April 1998, as amended by Law No. 2002-01 of 10 January 2002: Government of Senegal; Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission (CRSE); Rural Electrification Agency of Senegal (ASER); National Electricity Company of Senegal (SENELEC); various concessionaires and independent power producers. The participation of private investors will bolster the actions of public and/or parastatal entities. Consultation among the different parties provides another guarantee of sustainability. The gradual reduction of the Government compensation tariff (CFAF 76 billion projected for 2014 compared to CFAF 120 billion in 2012 and CFAF 88 billion in 201331), but with little impact on tariffs because

of cost reductions due to operating improvements could help to restore the sector's financial balance and contribute to the medium-to-long-term viability of operators. Furthermore, the security of power supply remains a problem because the country is 80% dependent on costly diesel-fired thermal plants32.

Water and Sanitation: Project implementation in the sector is supervised by the decentralized public services in rural areas which have insufficient staffing or budgets, hence the community anchoring noted. Information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns and technical support for the ASUFOR are encouraging community ownership of the outputs. However, the delivery of faulty equipment (level indicators, rusty staircases, etc.) could undermine the sustainability of the infrastructure. The diesel bill for engines of pumping station electric generators

To take over the management of drinking water supply facilities established with Bank assistance, a Borehole Users’ Association (ASUFOR) has been systematically established with volunteers: a Chairperson, a Secretary-General, a Treasurer, and a driver. However, these structures have been weakened by various problems: rural households are poor and prefer to allocate their income to expenditure items other than payment of their drinking water consumption supplied by the community network, which provides a further explanation for the use of wells and rivers. The number of users in some villages is so low that revenue collected is unable to meet network maintenance costs; furthermore, pumps are powered by electricity generators whose maintenance costs are higher than for electric generators that cannot be envisaged because there are no electricity grids in some villages. ASUFOR officials are volunteers whose benefits are insufficiently motivating to ensure their effective participation and renewal of their mandate upon completion of their mandate.

The Kalounayes ASUFOR (FAK) is a rural community initiative (Coubanao, Finthiock, Mandouar, Coubalan, Djilakoune) in Coubalan municipality set up to resolve water management problems in their territory. The FAK has interconnected all the individual village networks. This option makes it possible to: (i) achieve economies of scale in the purchase of consumables and spare parts; (ii) prevent supply disruptions which occur when a village generator breaks down; (iii) reduce water rates by an equalization payment; (iv) recruit qualified full-time staff to ensure professional management of the water networks (planning and implementation of maintenance works, budget preparation, monthly billing of consumption and recovery of household payments, as well as community sensitization and education, etc.).

However, this organizational model which was successful in Coubalan municipality should be more closely explored to determine the parameters of its success: network size (dimensions, unit costs); minimum number of villages and households (consumption and revenue); membership criteria and break-even price of m3 of water; etc.

Source: Discussions of the Evaluation Team with those concerned in the field, March 2015.

Box 3: ASUFOR Federation: a Model for the Sustainability of Water and Sanitation Infrastructure?


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

is unsustainable in light of the revenue collected by the ASUFORs. Electric engines powered either by the electricity grid or by independent solar plants would be more economical, but the connections to the interconnected electric power grid or to rural electrification depends on the public authorities.

Social Development: The combination of the education and health inter-sector approach, diversification of technical and financial partners, involvement of education personnel and beneficiary communities, as well as the search for synergies with existing initiatives could have strengthened the sustainability of outputs but for the many physical defects observed, construction work on flood-prone sites, and especially the lack of a formal financing mechanism and implementation of infrastructure maintenance and upkeep works involving local authorities and communities. Furthermore, teachers do not have the necessary skills to operate the educational equipment installed in schools.

Cross-Cutting Aspects

Gender: The gender issue has been mainstreamed in most operations. With the Bank's support, the Government has embarked upon the definition of a global action plan for gender mainstreaming in public policies as part of the updating of the 2005-2015 SNEEG and operationalization of the gender-disaggregated statistics master plan. The introduction of a quota at the National Assembly culminated in 2012 in a 43% increase in the number of female parliamentarians. Under the business climate-related reforms, women entrepreneurs are especially targeted following adoption of gender-sensitive work tools and receive part of the support and facilities provided. The same applies to rural development projects where women's income-generating activities have received specific support.

Regional Integration: This is at the core of the country's governance. The Bank has provided support to ensure compliance of the national systems with WAEMU community directives and standards. Over the period, 3 cross-border road corridors and structures to the Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali were completed. They have improved connectivity with neighbouring countries and helped to increase the volume of trade with these countries between 2009 and 201333. However, there are still some problems, in particular: (i) the failure to apply WAEMU Decision 14 on authorized axle loads; (ii) failure to implement the Convention Regulating Inter-State Road Transportation (ISRT) for goods in transit; and (iii) non-physical impediments by illicit practices of the Police, Customs and Gendarmerie with an estimated 1.3 control points every 100km in 2012, an average of CFAF 1,614 in illicit levies, and 14 minutes lost time34.

Environmental Management: Environmental impact assessments have been systematically conducted, particularly for all private sector operations. However, there have been delays in implementing the Environmental and Social Management Plan in some operations, particularly the Blaise Diagne International Airport and the Sendou Power Plant.

Bank Performance

Bank performance is fairly satisfactory. The national stakeholders are unanimous that the establishment of the Regional Office in Dakar in 2005 has intensified advisory services and technical assistance through more responsive direct contacts, facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-State actors, and helped the Government to adopt more efficient practices. This particularly concerns the joint annual review, the quarterly internal review, more regular


supervision, bi-monthly fiduciary clinics, individual coaching of project implementation unit managers and formal bi-monthly monitoring meetings on the implementation of the Portfolio Performance Improvement Plan. In 2012, the Bank organized 6 fiduciary clinics to build technical capacities, compared to 1 in 2011, with 180 and 51 civil servant participants respectively. However, it should be noted that these achievements could be threatened if the project task managers have too heavy a workload, particularly given the increase in the portfolio of operations with the private sector. Indeed, some project task managers, especially those of OPSM and OITC, have a heavy workload with about 5 operations to supervise. However, the Office has fielded over 90% of the required supervision missions (at least twice a year). Their recommendations have not been implemented, and this has hampered project implementation.

Inclusive Growth: The Bank has assisted with the inclusion of disadvantaged groups through job creation and the opening up of new business opportunities. The Youth and Women Employment Promotion Support Project approved in 2013 provides a specific response to this commitment. In the transport sector, 300 direct permanent positions have been created for the operation of the Dakar Port container terminal35. The staff complement of the concessionaire of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway rose from 141 in 2012 to 250 employees excluding expatriates in December 201436. The opening of over 1200 km of rural roads in 84 rural communities37 under the PPC/PNIR project has created opportunities for income-generating activities among disadvantaged rural communities and facilitated access for women and children to education and health care (Box 1). A similar situation exists along the internal and cross-border road corridors which have helped to reduce poverty among women and youths in the rural localities crossed (see Box 1). The survey conducted during this evaluation showed that

access to drinking water freed up people's time, allowing them to dedicate more time to agro-pastoral activities. In particular, there has been an increase in school attendance by both girls and boys. The participatory process observed in the design and implementation of operations has also contributed to the improvement. Specific mechanisms have also been established in several projects to ensure inclusion of disadvantaged groups.

Transition to Green Growth: The Bank has supported climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The same has been done in irrigation schemes which have improved water management and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climatic hazards and floods38.

Quality at Entry. Compliance with work frameworks has been reviewed. Unlike the 2002-2004 CSP, the 2005-2009 and 2010-2015 CSPs contain results-based logical framework in compliance with the recommended framework39. However, the performance indicators and their targets are not always comprehensively and accurately specified. Furthermore, the objectives and expected outcomes were determined without defining the means of achieving them. This is the case with the outcomes relating to modernization of the justice system which is not accompanied by specific projects in the 2005-2009 CSP.

Knowledge Management: The Bank completed only one of the 6 ESW studies scheduled between 2010 and 2015. The study, published in March 2015, concerned regional integration challenges and opportunities for Senegal. The Bank has mainly financed project preparation studies and environmental impact assessments. However, on the sidelines of the 2010-2015 CSP indicative lending program, the Bank conducted thirteen economic and sector work studies between 2010


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

and 201540. Furthermore, the Bank opened a knowledge and virtual resource centre at its Dakar Regional Office in April 2012, with a view to making knowledge products available to the general public. In 2012, this centre received 96 visitors and 156 in 2013. Finally, the Regional Office has placed advertisements in local newspapers and magazines, and distributed leaflets since 2011. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Bank placed 10, 13 and 16 advertisements and disseminated 1, 2 and 3 publications respectively.

Innovative Practices: On the Bank's advice, the Government prepares a six-monthly project portfolio review, with the participation of civil society and the private sector, particularly employers' associations and consular chambers. This exercise has been expanded by the Government to its cooperation with all the other partners. Discussions with the country team and MEFP task managers revealed that the Bank is considering initiating PPP in sectors other than energy and transport infrastructure. In agriculture, for example, preliminary studies on two PPP initiatives are ongoing: the Rice Value Chain Development Project in partnership with the NOVEL Group and the Rice Project of Saint-Louis Agricultural Company, Senegal (CASL former Afric Agri) in the rural community of Diama.

Policy Dialogue: The Bank has assisted the Government in taking measures to establish appropriate regulatory frameworks in the sectors concerned and a Framework Law on PPPs as part of the public sector reforms in order to achieve the priority objective of strong and redistributive growth to roll back poverty by 50%. The Bank and Government of Senegal have also been increasingly successful in mobilizing public and private sector window financing by turning, if necessary, to private investors grouped together in public-private partnerships (PPP) for large-scale infrastructure, especially in the transport

and electric power sectors over the period concerned. The Bank has contributed, through specific economic and sector work, preliminary feasibility studies, as well as detailed risk assessments. Against a backdrop of political stability and commitment of the authorities to pursue and deepen reforms, Senegal has thus become the leader in the sub-region in the development of PPP projects41. The Bank has assumed a leadership role in financing and has gathered private investors around the table in public-private partnerships (PPP). It is positioned as the leader for public-private partnership (PPP) initiatives among the country's main partners (AFD, IsDB, WADB, IDC, etc.).

Coordination and complementarity with the other partners: The Bank consults with Senegal's other partners within the various policy dialogue and working groups it periodically chairs or co-chairs (Group of 50, Group of 12, ACAB Group, Statistics and Energy Thematic Group, etc.). It participates in the self-evaluation of aid coordination mechanisms. In the field, the Bank has pioneered, through the Health Project II, the introduction of the emergency obstetric care strategy and the decentralization of referral health centres, and this has created a conducive environment for Belgian Technical Cooperation to introduce district surgery.

Leverage Effect: The Bank was ranked 6th in 2012 among Senegal's forty-odd development partners42. The number of projects cofinanced by the Bank rose from 4 to 12 between 2008 and 2013. The number of operations with the private sector (transport and energy economic infrastructure) rose from 1 to 6, respectively corresponding to €7.25 million and €162.99 million i.e. a 2148 % increase over the period. Consequently, the catalytic role of the Bank's private sector investment has strengthened. However, compared to its peers, the Bank


is perceived as slow in administration with cumbersome and complex procedures.

Results-Based Management: The monitoring/evaluation system focuses more on processes and outputs than on their impact on the beneficiaries. Where it exists, monitoring/evaluation data is scattered among the PIUs. It is not available in the Government services in which the PIUs are anchored. Furthermore, the MEFP Investment Department regrets its sidelining from private sector monitoring operations. Nor is there a systematic mechanism by which lessons learned from the implementation experience of Bank operations or economic and sector work are used in the design of new operations, although there are isolated cases such as the Resilience Project (PRSS) which draws on the PAPIL.

Country Performance

The country performance is fairly satisfactory. The country's strategic priorities are clear in the various national development planning documents (PRSP I, PRSP II, SNDES, PES, SCA). The efforts made by Senegal in governance reforms and development outcome management have enabled the country to obtain increased support from its development partners. Official development

assistance (ODA) rose from CFAF 479 billion to CFAF 697 billion between 2010 and 201244, i.e. a 45.5% increase. Aid coordination by the Government has been strengthened, as reflected in the preparation of the annual Development Cooperation Report (DCR) since 2012. In the water and sanitation sector, the Government established an institutional mechanism in 2005 to ensure successful design, financing and implementation of public policy: the policy letter, Millennium Drinking Water and Sanitation Program (PEPAM), the donor round table with the private sector, and the bilateral and multilateral Technical and Financial Partners' Consultative Committee (CCPTF) of which the Bank is a member, under the leadership of the MEFP's DCEF. The donors have formed various thematic groups which consult regularly with the authorities. The Government consults non-State actors, especially the private sector and civil society, through meetings held once or twice a year or involves them in periodic joint reviews.

The MEFP, which administers development cooperation, contributes significantly to supervision mission aide-memoires, although the recommendations agreed upon are not always implemented. According to the parties concerned, PIU performances have improved since July 2003 with the adoption of quarterly

Table 7: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Senegal43

Project SAP Code Sector Approval Date Status Net Amount Approved (UA)

Kounoune Thermal Power Plant P-SN-FAA-001 Energy 22-06-05 Ongoing 6 409 484.73

Dakar Container Terminal P-SN-DD0-002 Transport 20-07-09 Ongoing 17 671 591.15

Sendou Coal-Fired Power Plant Project

P-SN-F00-004 Energy 25-11-09 Ongoing 48 596 875.66

Dakar Toll Motorway P-SN-DB0-012 Transport 19-07-10 Ongoing 8 367 207.68

Blaise Diagne International Airport (AIDB)

P-SN-DA0-001 Transport 17-12-10 Ongoing 61 850 569.03

Total 142 895 728.3Source: National reports on the status of education from 2000 to 2011 and SimulPDEF Phase 3.


An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

internal reviews and annual joint reviews with the Bank. However, the following problems remain: difficulties in mobilizing counterpart funds, delays in the fulfillment of conditions precedent to the first disbursement as well as the start-up of activities, delays in the submission of audit reports; concentration of monitoring and decision-making powers and slow procedures, lack of

firmness of the energy sector regulator in settling disputes relating to the implementation of public-private partnerships between actors; instability of project implementation unit coordinators; delays, additional costs and poor quality of structures due to the malfunctioning of procurement procedures, especially in the education, health and agriculture sectors.

The gender issue has been mainstreamed in most operations. With the Bank's support, the Government has embarked upon the definition of a global action plan for gender mainstreaming in public policies as part of the updating of the 2005-2015 SNEEG and operationalization of the gender-disaggregated statistics master plan. The introduction of a quota at the National Assembly culminated in 2012 in a 43% increase in the number of female parliamentarians.

Photo/ Presidency of Republic of Senegal

Photo credit/CERD

This report concludes that, “while the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.”

43Conclusions and Recommendations

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Conclusions and Recommendations

Main Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Overall, the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, thanks mainly to the Results-Based CSP framework, the clarity of the government's priorities, and the practice of consultation involving the private sector and non-State actors. However, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.

The Bank has implemented many operations in all the priority sectors. Despite difficult operating conditions, the transport infrastructure has helped to improve urban mobility and cross-border trade, as well as develop local economies in rural areas. One of the main lessons learned from this evaluation is that the development of rural roads is a promising means of deepening decentralization and transforming local economies to reduce rural poverty.

Public management reforms have helped to establish good governance structures and institutions. However, the reforms encountered coordination and collaboration problems. One budget support-related lesson is that it is a relevant and effective instrument only under certain conditions: (i) the authorities and entities in charge of implementation assume ownership of the governance reforms; (ii) the measures recommended in the various administrative services are coherent; (iii) program

design adopts a holistic and systemic approach to problem resolution; and (iv) project management technical capacities (procurement, disbursements etc.) of actors of community-based projects are developed.

Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stock breeders have increased the sown areas and local production. However, a general decline in yields has been observed. The water and sanitation facilities have not helped to achieve the set objectives. The electric power generation and distribution initiatives have been implemented, but operational difficulties have prevented households and businesses from obtaining more affordable electric power. More generally, one lesson concerning small infrastructure development projects and the adoption of agricultural technology aimed at building the resilience of rural communities is that their success depends on: (i) the experience and commitment of the project implementation teams; (ii) simplified but rigorous procurement procedures; (iii) the development of partnerships; (iv) effective communication; and (v) an integrated value chain approach.

Cost overruns are almost systematic in the construction of health care facilities and are sources of dissatisfaction. The same applies to the energy sector where the slippage on start-up of the Sendou coal-fired power plant has resulted in significant additional costs, despite lower unit and supervision costs. The poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project has affected the efficiency of the Bank's portfolio in the water and sanitation


sector, where the unit cost of drinking water supply is, however, at the midpoint performance of Senegal's other partners.

The contribution of the State Budget to FERA is unpredictable, and this undermines implementation of the annual road maintenance program and sustainability of economic benefits in the transport sector. Indeed, the FERA budget execution rate is low (67% in 2014 out of CFAF 34 billion budgeted, with CFAF 7 billion expected from the State Budget). Additional costs are estimated at CFAF 35 billion per year more than the FERA budget. In the energy sector, the gradual reduction of the government tariff compensation could make it possible to achieve financial viability. Arrangements for ensuring maintenance of water and sanitation structures are inadequate. In the governance sector, reform measures are not applied comprehensively and thoroughly by the public administrations. In education and health, defects, design flaws and the lack of training of staff in the use and maintenance of ultra-modern equipment could jeopardize sustainability of the infrastructure constructed. Works quality control and strict application of sanctions against defaulting contractors on public contracts are requirements for the structures constructed.

The Bank has contributed to the inclusion of disadvantaged groups, particularly women and youths, by creating jobs and new income-generating activity opportunities in the priority sectors. However,

the beneficiaries are often unaware of the Bank's achievements due to lack of communication. The Bank has supported the transition to green growth through climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. However, implementation of the environmental and social management plan has not been systematic.

Finally, the Bank has established itself in its role as driver of private investment through PPPs. There are many development opportunities in this area. Indeed, electric power demand exceeds supply (at national level, distribution covers 50% of households and 8% of businesses) and the sector is financially viable given the reduction in the government tariff compensation and improved operating conditions. Similarly, water and sanitation access rates remain low (in urban areas, the sanitation access rate is 35.6% and the drinking water access rate is 81.2% compared to the respective targets of 78% and 100%). In rural areas, the sanitation access rate is 40% and the drinking water access rate is 60% compared to the respective targets of 20% and 82%), and the related infrastructure represents a profitable investment from an economic and social standpoint. Agriculture also provides private investors with opportunities, especially in the development of value chains, which is fully in keeping with the Government's priority of diversifying the Senegalese economy. However, knowledge management is not yet systematic, and cumbersome procedures negatively affect the Bank's performance.

45Conclusions and Recommendations

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Recommendations

Strengthen the Bank's strategic positioning. Greater selectivity of intervention areas, based on adequate analytical studies, is recommended to allow the Bank to optimize its development outcomes. In order to transform the local economies and reduce poverty, the Bank could, by targeting specific areas: (i) invest in the development of rural roads as a complement to the main highways; and (ii) seize existing opportunities for public-private partnerships (PPP) to increase its catalytic impact in the energy, water and sanitation, agriculture and rural development sectors. With regard to governance, deepening of the ongoing reforms and support for more effective functioning of the structures and institutions could have more significant effects and help the country to pursue progress, especially regarding the business environment.

Ensure the sustainability of infrastructures. For roads in particular, one of the areas of dialogue with the Government is the establishment of a mechanism that will ensure timely contribution

of the State Budget to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund in compliance with the Annual Road Maintenance Program. Furthermore, closer involvement of community-based organizations in the management of local infrastructure should be considered in the implementation of the Bank's procedures not only in terms of consultation but also of participation in management through the award of contracts.

Improve the effectiveness of project/program supervision through three complementary actions: (i) assist the Government in establishing an efficient national results-based monitoring/evaluation system, which could also provide the Bank with reliable data on implementation performances and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision missions to cover all the relevant aspects, including closer monitoring of the implementation of environmental management plans and quality control to prevent the numerous physical defects in some structures; and (iii) ensure compliance with the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.

Photo/World Bank

Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stock breeders have increased the sown areas and local production. However, a general decline in yields has been observed.

Annexes


Annex A: Methodology Description

Data and Sources

The data concerns the Bank's strategies and programs at country level as defined in the CSPs, priority sectors and implementation of operations.

In the case of data relating to the description of the Bank's strategies and the priority sectors over the period under consideration, the 2010-2015, 2005-2009 and 2002-2004 CSPs were recovered from the DARMS database of the Bank's Intranet. Data concerning operations was drawn from the Bank's SAP database, periodic reports, back-to-office supervision mission reports, validation reports of completion reports available in DARMS or from task managers.

A consolidated database of Bank operations in Senegal has been compiled in MS Excel format. For each operation completed (and ongoing in the case of the governance sector), an individual evaluation sheet was prepared to provide information on the results achieved and the implementation arrangements. This sheet is divided into three sections: (a) one section for the collection of information relating to the basic data of the project concerned; (b) one section presents the components of the project set-up, such as the intervention area, outcomes and activities; and (c) the final section concerns the indicators defined for the evaluation (see Annex 2). For each indicator, the expected or estimated value is presented alongside the value noted by the evaluator. These values may be qualitative or quantitative.

Data extracted from the documentary review have been triangulated with primary qualitative and quantitative data collected from the various actors: Bank teams, Ministries and Government services concerned in Senegal, project implementation teams, beneficiaries, civil society, private sector economic operators, sector experts, etc.

Data Collection Methods

Data was collected by different means: (a) documentary review; (b) semi-structured discussions with the various groups concerned and experts; (c) administration of a questionnaire; and (d) direct observation during a quick field survey.

Sampling of Sites and Respondents

This evaluation constitutes a key component of the CEDR. It focuses on a description of the results achieved by the implementation of operations financed by the Bank in Senegal between 2004 and 2013.

49Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Because of budget and time constraints and to ensure adequate geographical representation, the quick survey concerned completed and closed projects45, as well as ongoing projects at an advanced stage of implementation with outputs and if possible immediate outcomes.

Table A1: Distribution of Projects Concerned by the Evaluation (by sector and implementation status)

Sectors Implementation Status Total Number of ProjectsApproved Completed Closed Ongoing

Agriculture and Rural Development

1 5 1 4 11

Transport 1 0 1 7 9

Multi-Sector (Governance) 0 1 3 4 8

Water and Sanitation 1 3 1 1 6

Social Development 1 2 0 0 3

Energy 1 0 0 2 3

Total 5 11 6 18 40

Source: Extract from AfDB SAP Database, August 2014.

Table A2: Sampling of Sites and Respondents

Region Department Arrondissement (Administrative District)

Municipality Total

Dakar Dakar Dakar 74

Rufisque Rufisque Diamniadio 3

Sendou 4

Sangalkame Kounoune 3

Fatick Fatick Fatick Fatick 7

Foudiougne Foudiougne 3

Toubacouta Keur Saloum Diané 3

Keur Samba Guèye 6

Toubacouta 2

Kaffrine Kaffrine Kaffrine Kaffrine 9

Gniby 10

Maka-Yop Ida Mouride 3

Sagna Sagna 10

Ndiobene Samba Lama 10

Kaolack Kaolack Passi 2

Kaolack 28

Kedougou Kédougou Bandafassi Bandafassi 3

Kedougou Kedougou 12

Saraya Saraya 4

Moussala 4


Region Department Arrondissement (Administrative District)

Municipality Total

Kolda Kolda Kolda 7

Dabo Dabo 2

Bagadadji 2

Mampatim 3

Dioulacolon Dioulacolon 2

Médina El Hadj 3

Saré Bidji 3

Tankanto Escale 1

Medina Yorofoula Medina Yorofoula 12

Nianing Nianing 10

Vélingara Saré Coli Sale Diaoubé 10

Louga Kébémer Kébémer 3

Darou Mousty Waréane 3

Ndande Fass 1

Linguère Barkedji Gassane - Barkédji 7

Sagatta Dioloff Sagatta Dioloff 4

Louga Louga 10

Keur Momar Sarr Keur Momar Sarr 3

Ngeur Malal 12

Mbediène Nguidillé 4

Sakal Léona 2

Nguène-Sarr 12

Sakal 5

Matam Ranérou-Ferlo Vélingara Ranérou 3

Kanel Kanel 1

Matam 13

Saint-Louis Dagana Dagana 3

Mbane Gaé 4

Mbane 3

Saint-Louis Saint-Louis 10

Sédhiou Sédhiou Sédhiou 4

Sansamba 10

Tambacounda Tambacounda Tambacounda 14

Djamweli 10

Missirah Netteboulou 10

Missirah 1

Dialacoto 10

Thiès Mbour Mbour 4

Ziguinchor Bignona Tenghory Niamone 10

Koubalan 10

Tenghory 20

Oussouye Oussouye 2

Ziguinchor Ziguinchor 17

Total 480

51Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Port

folio

of P

roje

cts

incl

uded

in th

e Ev

alua

tion

Proj

ects

App

rove

d be

twee

n 20

04 a

nd 2

013

Proj

ect C

ode

Proj

ect N

ame

Stat

usAp

prov

al D

ate

Sect

orNe

t Am

ount

(UA

)So

urce

of

Fina

ncin

g20

02 -

200

4 C

SPP-

Z1-A

A0-0

85In

vasi

ve A

quat

ic W

eeds

Clos

ed22

-09-

04Ag

ricul

ture

1,98

8,30

1.37

ADF

P-SN

-FA0

-002

Rura

l Ele

ctrifi

catio

n Pr

ojec

tOn

goin

g13

-10-

04En

ergy

9,58

0,00

0.00

ADF

2005

- 2

009

CSP

P-SN

-KZ0

-003

Land

Reg

istra

tion

Mod

erni

zatio

n Pr

ojec

t (P

AMOC

A)Cl

osed

22-0

4-05

Mul

tisec

tor

2,19

5,68

1.12

ADF

P-SN

-FAA

-001

Koun

oune

The

rmal

Pow

er P

lant

Ongo

ing

22-0

6-05

Ener

gy6,

409,

484.

73Af

DB

P-SN

-DB0

-008

Road

Mai

nten

ance

Pro

ject

Clos

ed29

-06-

05Tr

ansp

ort

27,1

95,0

51.9

2AD

F

P-SN

-E00

-003

Rura

l DW

SS P

roje

ctCl

osed

21-0

9-05

Wat

er a

nd

Sani

tatio

n24

,921

,588

.79

ADF

P-SN

-A00

-001

Casa

man

ce R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t (PA

DERC

A)On

goin

g19

-10-

05Ag

ricul

ture

20,0

00,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-Z1

-DB0

-013

Road

Dev

elop

men

t and

Tra

nspo

rt Fa

cilit

atio

n Pr

ogra

m:

Sout

hern

Bam

ako-

Daka

r Co

rrido

r

Ongo

ing

21-1

2-05

Tran

spor

t14

,449

,536

.82

ADF/

ACFA

P-Z1

-AAE

-010

Sust

aina

ble

Man

agem

ent o

f End

emic

Ru

min

ant L

ivest

ock

in W

est A

frica

- S

eneg

alOn

goin

g25

-01-

06Ag

ricul

ture

4,44

0,00

0.00

ADF

P-Z1

-DB0

-029

Labé

- S

érib

a - T

amba

coun

da R

oad

Ongo

ing

04-1

2-06

Tran

spor

t20

,500

,000

.00

ADF

P-SN

-EB0

-002

Zigu

inch

or S

anita

tion

Mas

ter P

lan

Com

plet

ed22

-12-

06W

ater

and

Sa

nita

tion

826,

146.

89AW

F

P-SN

-EAZ

-002

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

PAG

IRE

in S

eneg

alCo

mpl

eted

31-0

8-07

Wat

er a

nd

Sani

tatio

n1,

396,

055.

70AW

F

P-SN

-K00

-005

Pove

rty R

educ

tion

Stra

tegy

Sup

port

Proj

ect

Com

plet

ed22

-12-

08M

ultis

ecto

r30

,000

,000

.00

ADF

P-SN

-E00

-004

Seco

nd R

ural

DW

SS S

ub-P

rogr

amOn

goin

g18

-02-

09W

ater

and

Sa

nita

tion

30,0

00,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-SN

-DB0

-010

Daka

r-Di

amni

adio

Mot

orw

ayOn

goin

g15

-07-

09Tr

ansp

ort

45,0

00,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-SN

-DD0

-002

Daka

r Con

tain

er T

erm

inal

Ongo

ing

20-0

7-09

Tran

spor

t17

,671

,591

.15

AfDB

P-SN

-F00

-004

Send

ou C

oal-F

ired

Pow

er P

lant

Pro

ject

Appr

oved

25-1

1-09

Ener

gy48

,596

,875

.66

AfDB

2010

- 2

015

P-SN

-DB0

-012

Daka

r Tol

l Mot

orw

ayOn

goin

g19

-07-

10Tr

ansp

ort

8,36

7,20

7.68

AfDB

P-SN

-DB0

-017

Lend

ing

Oper

atio

ns -

Priv

ate

Sect

orAp

prov

ed19

-07-

10Tr

ansp

ort

1,32

5,36

9.34

AfDB

P-SN

-DA0

-001

Blai

se D

iagn

e In

tern

atio

nal A

irpor

t (AI

BD)

Ongo

ing

17-1

2-10

Tran

spor

t61

,850

,569

.03

AfDB


Proj

ect C

ode

Proj

ect N

ame

Stat

usAp

prov

al D

ate

Sect

orNe

t Am

ount

(UA

)So

urce

of

Fina

ncin

g20

10 -

201

5P-

SN-A

AC-0

03PA

PIL

Supp

lem

enta

ry L

oan

Ongo

ing

31-0

1-11

Agric

ultu

re8,

400,

000.

00AD

F

P-SN

-K00

-006

Econ

omic

Ref

orm

Sup

port

Prog

ram

(PAR

E)Cl

osed

06-0

7-11

Mul

tisec

tor

27,0

00,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-Z1

-DB0

-046

Cons

truct

ion

of th

e Tr

ans-

Gam

bia

Brid

ge a

nd C

ross

-Bo

rder

Impr

ovem

ent

Ongo

ing

16-1

2-11

Tran

spor

t3,

180,

000.

00AD

F

P-SN

-A00

-006

Emer

genc

y Hu

man

itaria

n As

sist

ance

to R

ural

Are

as.

Com

plet

ed10

-09-

12Ag

ricul

ture

650,

935.

72Sp

ecia

l Rel

ief

Fund

P-SN

-KA0

-008

Lend

ing

Oper

atio

ns -

Pub

lic S

ecto

r (Pr

ivate

Sec

tor

Prom

otio

n Su

ppor

t Pro

gram

)On

goin

g10

-09-

12M

ultis

ecto

r4,

040,

000.

00AD

F

P-SN

-EBZ

-001

Colle

ctio

n, M

anag

emen

t and

Dra

inag

e of

Slu

dge

in

Zigu

inch

orAp

prov

ed23

-04-

13W

ater

and

Sa

nita

tion

113,

310.

24AW

F

P-SN

-A00

-005

Food

Sec

urity

Sup

port

Proj

ect i

n Lo

uga,

Mat

am a

nd

Kaffr

ine

regi

ons

Ongo

ing

26-0

4-13

Agric

ultu

re28

,037

,428

.80

ADF/

GAFS

P

P-SN

-K00

-008

Incl

usive

Gro

wth

Sup

port

Prog

ram

(PAC

ICE)

Ongo

ing

19-0

6-13

Mul

tisec

tor

25,5

40,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-SN

-KE0

-001

The

Com

mun

ity R

oads

Pro

ject

in s

uppo

rt of

the

Natio

nal

Loca

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

gram

Pha

se II

Ongo

ing

17-0

7-13

Mul

tisec

tor

15,0

00,0

00.0

0AD

F

P-SN

-KB0

-001

VoLo

Afri

ca T

rust

Info

rmat

ion

and

Cred

it Bu

reau

Pilo

t Pr

ojec

tOn

goin

g05

-08-

13M

ultis

ecto

r18

5,17

2.99

Fund

for A

frica

n Pr

ivate

Sec

tor

Assi

stan

ce

P-SN

-A00

-004

Proj

ect t

o Re

stor

e th

e Ec

olog

ical

and

Eco

nom

ic

Func

tions

of L

ake

Guie

rsAp

prov

ed04

-09-

13Ag

ricul

ture

15,8

56,3

22.2

1AD

F/FE

M

P-SN

-IAZ-

001

Proj

ect t

o Su

ppor

t the

Pro

mot

ion

of E

mpl

oym

ent f

or Y

outh

an

d W

omen

Appr

oved

23-1

0-13

Soci

al21

,190

,000

.00

ADF

TOTA

L (in

UA)

525,

906,

630.

16

* Gl

obal

Agr

icul

ture

and

Foo

d Se

curit

y Pr

ogra

m (G

AFSP

)

53Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Proj

ect N

ame

Stat

us*

Appr

oval

Dat

e Se

ctor

Net A

mou

nt (U

A)So

urce

of F

inan

cing

Live

stoc

k Pr

ojec

t II

Com

plet

ed17

-05-

00Ag

ricul

ture

13,4

04,7

26.9

8AD

F/IA

DM

Anam

be B

asin

Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent S

uppo

rt Pr

ojec

tCo

mpl

eted

25-0

4-01

Agric

ultu

re7,

414,

391.

96AD

F/IA

DM

Daka

r San

itatio

n Pr

ojec

tCo

mpl

eted

12-0

7-01

Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

11,8

88,2

79.2

9AD

F/IA

DM

Rura

l Inf

rast

ruct

ure

Proj

ect

Com

plet

ed03

-04-

02Ag

ricul

ture

16,3

27,7

12.8

3AD

F/IA

DM/O

PEP

Supp

ort f

or th

e De

partm

ent o

f For

ecas

ts a

nd S

tatis

tics.

Clos

ed12

-12-

02M

ultis

ecto

r13

3,91

9,10

4.00

ADF

Heal

th II

Com

plet

ed18

-06-

03So

cial

11,5

67,2

83.5

4AD

F/IA

DM

Educ

atio

n IV

Com

plet

ed25

-06-

03So

cial

15,0

02,2

64.4

6AD

F/IA

DM

Loca

l Sm

all-S

cale

Irrig

atio

n Su

ppor

t Pro

ject

(PAP

IL)

Com

plet

ed22

-10-

03Ag

ricul

ture

14,3

10,0

00.0

0AD

F

Tota

l22

3,83

3,76

3.06

Proj

ects

App

rove

d af

ter 2

000

and

Com

plet

ed b

etw

een

2004

and

201

3


Ann

ex 2

: Eva

luat

ion

Mat

rice

sRe

leva

nce

and

Sust

aina

bilit

y Ev

alua

tion

Crite

riaSp

ecifi

c Qu

estio

ns

for S

eneg

alM

etho

dolo

gica

l Ap

proa

chM

ain

Indi

cato

rsNe

cess

ary

Data

Data

Sou

rces

Data

Col

lect

ion

Met

hods

Data

Ana

lysi

s M

etho

dsRe

leva

nce

1. T

o w

hat e

xten

t is

the

Bank

’s c

ount

ry

stra

tegy

rele

vant

in

rela

tion

to th

e co

untry

’s s

trate

gic

deve

lopm

ent

fram

ewor

k?

In th

e co

untry

fra

mew

ork

docu

men

ts

and

CSPs

, com

pare

th

e al

ignm

ent e

lem

ent

by e

lem

ent o

f: (i)

st

rate

gic

obje

ctive

s (ii

) spe

cific

obj

ectiv

es

and

(iii)

oper

atio

ns

impl

emen

ted

1. L

evel

of a

lignm

ent

of s

trate

gies

Obje

ctive

s, o

utco

mes

an

d ac

tiviti

es p

lann

ed

by G

over

nmen

t ove

r th

e pe

riod;

Obj

ectiv

es,

outc

omes

and

pro

ject

s pl

anne

d un

der t

he

CSPs

Natio

nal s

trate

gy

docu

men

ts; C

SPEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

biva

riate

ana

lysis

(c

ontin

genc

y ta

bles

)

2. T

o w

hat e

xten

t is

the

Bank

’s c

ount

ry

stra

tegy

rele

vant

in

rela

tion

to th

e ta

rget

gr

oups

of t

he B

ank'

s op

erat

ions

?

In th

e co

untry

's

fram

ewor

k do

cum

ents

an

d di

ffere

nt s

tudi

es

on th

e co

untry

in

clud

ing

AfDB

/ES

W, c

ompa

re: (

i) th

e ob

ject

ives

of o

ngoi

ng/

com

plet

ed p

roje

cts,

an

d (ii

) pro

blem

s/ne

eds

iden

tified

and

ex

pect

ed o

utco

mes

at

targ

et g

roup

leve

l.

2. E

xten

t of

cons

iste

ncy

betw

een

the

Bank

’s o

pera

tions

an

d th

e re

quire

men

ts

of th

e ta

rget

po

pula

tion.

Prob

lem

s/pr

iorit

y de

velo

pmen

t nee

ds

of th

e ta

rget

are

a co

mm

uniti

es;

obje

ctive

s, o

utco

mes

an

d pr

ojec

ts

impl

emen

ted

on A

fDB

finan

cing

Vario

us e

cono

mic

an

d so

cial

stu

dies

; ne

wsp

aper

arti

cles

; st

akeh

olde

rs (S

NFO,

NG

Os, e

xper

ts,

auth

oriti

es)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

biva

riate

ana

lysis

(c

ontin

genc

y ta

bles

)

55Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Sust

aina

bilit

y4.

To

wha

t ext

ent a

re

the

outc

omes

like

ly to

be

mai

ntai

ned

follo

win

g co

mpl

etio

n of

th

e Ba

nk’s

ass

ista

nce?

(a) I

dent

ify th

e co

nditi

ons

requ

ired

for s

usta

inab

ility

of

the

achi

evem

ents

: te

chni

cal c

apac

ities

, so

urce

s of

fina

ncin

g fo

r ope

ratin

g co

sts,

po

pula

tion

trend

s, e

tc.

(b) A

nalyz

e ex

istin

g co

nditi

ons

and

asse

ss

thei

r im

pact

on

the

sust

aina

bilit

y of

ac

hiev

emen

ts

a. R

egul

arity

(ann

ual

rate

) of c

ount

erpa

rt fu

nd d

isbu

rsem

ents

Proj

ect d

isbu

rsem

ent

stat

istic

sPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); na

tiona

l sec

tor

stud

ies;

sta

keho

lder

s (e

xper

ts, m

inis

tries

/im

plem

enta

tion

units

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Tabl

es a

nd fi

gure

s

b. %

of P

IUs

inte

grat

ed

into

adm

inis

tratio

nLi

st o

f ove

rsig

ht

adm

inis

tratio

ns a

nd

PIU

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

; DC

EF d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

Exis

tenc

e of

a

mec

hani

sm to

ens

ure

the

sust

aina

bilit

y of

ac

hiev

emen

ts

DCEF

doc

umen

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;

Exis

tenc

e of

a

mec

hani

sm fo

r the

su

stai

nabi

lity

of

achi

evem

ents

in

each

op

erat

ion

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

;Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Fr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Hi

stog

ram

Com

mun

ity

parti

cipa

tion

in

proj

ect d

esig

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith th

ose

conc

erne

d

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(qui

ck s

urve

y)

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

Targ

et g

roup

s ha

ve

rece

ived

spec

ific

train

ing

to b

e ab

le to

ta

ke o

ver

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith th

ose

conc

erne

d

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

Exis

tenc

e of

sou

rces

of

reve

nue

to fi

nanc

e re

curre

nt c

osts

in th

e pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion

mec

hani

sm

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith th

ose

conc

erne

d

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(qui

ck s

urve

y)

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m


Effic

ienc

y

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effic

ienc

y5.

At w

hat c

osts

(uni

t) di

d th

e Ba

nk a

chie

ve

the

resu

lts o

btai

ned

for S

eneg

al o

ver t

he

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Have

mea

sure

s be

en

take

n to

enh

ance

ef

ficie

ncy?

Calc

ulat

e th

e va

rious

co

sts

from

the

proj

ect

docu

men

ts: a

ppra

isal

re

port,

PCR

, PCR

-EN,

QP

AR, a

nnua

l rep

orts

, au

dit r

epor

ts, e

tc.,

MTR

, etc

.

a. O

utpu

t uni

t cos

tsTi

me

serie

sPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

b. T

otal

pro

ject

ex

pend

iture

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

;Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

c. A

vera

ge p

roje

ct

man

agem

ent c

ost

(coo

rdin

atio

n, M

&E

adm

inis

trativ

e an

d fin

anci

al m

anag

emen

t

Tim

e se

ries

Calc

ulat

ions

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; a

rithm

etic

ca

lcul

atio

ns

Curv

es

d. %

of c

oord

inat

ion,

M

&E, a

dmin

istra

tive

and

finan

cial

m

anag

emen

t cos

ts

in re

latio

n to

the

tota

l pr

ojec

t cos

t (IF

AD/C

PE,

2014

)

Tim

e se

ries

Calc

ulat

ions

arith

met

ic c

alcu

latio

nsCu

rves

6. W

hat l

evel

of

reso

urce

s w

as

mob

ilized

by

the

Sene

gal O

ffice

dur

ing

the

desi

gn a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

Bank

's s

trate

gy o

ver

the

perio

d?

Use

of O

ffice

's in

tern

al

repo

rtse.

Coo

rdin

atio

n, M

&E

adm

inis

trativ

e an

d fin

anci

al m

anag

emen

t co

sts

in re

latio

n to

the

aver

age

for t

he re

gion

an

d th

e Ba

nk (%

)

Tim

e se

ries

arith

met

ic c

alcu

latio

nsCu

rves

Amou

nt o

f Offi

ce's

bu

dget

(in

UA)

Tim

e se

ries

Intra

net:

Revie

w

repo

rts; O

ffice

ad

min

istra

tive

repo

rts

Extra

ctio

nCu

rves

PL/G

S st

aff a

nd tr

end

over

tim

eTi

me

serie

sId

emEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Curv

es

Task

man

ager

s'

supe

rvis

ion

wor

kloa

dTi

me

serie

sId

emEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith

parti

es (p

roje

ct ta

sk

man

ager

s)

Curv

es

57Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Bank

Per

form

ance

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

7. T

o w

hat e

xten

t doe

s th

e Ba

nk's

stra

tegy

fo

r the

cou

ntry

re

flect

the

Bank

's

oper

atio

nal p

riorit

ies

(gen

der,

regi

onal

in

tegr

atio

n, c

limat

e ch

ange

, env

ironm

enta

l pr

otec

tion,

etc

.)?

In th

e Ba

nk's

fra

mew

ork

docu

men

ts

(TYS

, med

ium

-ter

m

fram

ewor

ks) a

nd

CSPs

, com

pare

the

alig

nmen

t ele

men

t by

ele

men

t of:

(i)

stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ives

(ii) s

peci

fic o

bjec

tives

an

d (ii

i) op

erat

ions

im

plem

ente

d in

re

latio

n to

wha

t has

be

en d

one

in th

e co

untry

.

a. L

evel

of a

lignm

ent

of s

trate

gies

/pla

ns fo

r th

e re

leva

nt p

erio

d

The

elem

ents

(O

bjec

tives

, out

com

es

and

proj

ects

) pla

nned

un

der t

he C

SPs

and

thos

e a

nd th

ose

of th

e TY

S an

d ot

her B

ank

plan

ning

fram

ewor

ks

Intra

net (

DARM

S)Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

8. W

hat i

s th

e qu

ality

of

the

CSP

in te

rms

of

com

plia

nce

with

the

CSP

fram

ewor

k an

d th

e Ba

nk's

rele

vant

op

erat

iona

l gui

delin

es

(whi

ch g

uide

lines

?)?

Com

pare

the

CSPs

an

d th

eir c

onte

nt

with

the

outli

ne

reco

mm

enda

tions

an

d th

e di

ffere

nt

oper

atio

nal g

uide

lines

Leve

l of c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith th

e fra

mew

ork

Diffe

rent

fram

ewor

ks

depe

ndin

g on

the

CSP

pe

riod;

the

CSPs

Intra

net;

SNFO

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

co

untry

team

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

Leve

l of c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith a

pplic

able

op

erat

iona

l gui

delin

es

List

of r

elev

ant B

ank

guid

elin

esIn

trane

t; Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith

coun

try te

am

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

9. T

o w

hat e

xten

t are

th

e Ba

nk's

ope

ratio

ns

in S

eneg

al in

clus

ive?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-stru

ctur

ed

disc

ussi

ons

with

the

bene

ficia

ries

and

othe

r st

akeh

olde

rs(d

) Com

pare

the

expe

cted

and

act

ual

outc

omes

4a. %

pop

ulat

ion

livin

g be

low

the

natio

nal

pove

rty li

ne

Tim

e se

ries

AfDB

Sta

tistic

sFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Cu

rves

4b. I

ncom

e in

equa

lity

(Gin

i ind

ex)

Tim

e se

ries

AfDB

Sta

tistic

sFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Cu

rves

4c/4

d/4e

. Tot

al/Y

outh

/W

omen

une

mpl

oym

ent

rate

(%)

Tim

e se

ries

AfDB

Sta

tistic

sFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Cu

rves


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

10. T

o w

hat e

xten

t ha

ve th

e Ba

nk's

op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

cont

ribut

ed to

gre

en

grow

th?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts o

btai

ned

by

dire

ct o

bser

vatio

n in

th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Id

entif

y th

e re

sults

ob

tain

ed th

roug

h se

mi-s

truct

ured

di

scus

sion

s w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her

stak

ehol

ders

;(d

) Com

pare

the

expe

cted

and

act

ual

outc

omes

.

a. E

colo

gica

l foo

tprin

t (g

ha)

Tim

e se

ries

Bank

's R

MF;

AfD

B St

atis

tics;

Wor

ld B

ank

Data

Por

tal

Curv

es

5b. N

umbe

r of p

eopl

e af

fect

ed b

y na

tura

l di

sast

ers

Tim

e se

ries

Bank

's R

MF;

AfD

B St

atis

tics;

Wor

ld B

ank

Data

Por

tal

Curv

es

5c. F

ood

inse

curit

y ra

teTi

me

serie

sBa

nk's

RM

F; A

fDB

Stat

istic

s; W

orld

Ban

k Da

ta P

orta

l; FA

O Gl

obal

Ear

ly W

arni

ng

Syst

em

Curv

es

11. W

hat i

s th

e Ba

nk's

per

form

ance

as

a d

evel

opm

ent

partn

er in

the

desi

gn,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of

resu

lts?

Com

pare

SNF

O's

outp

uts

in re

latio

n to

th

e ba

sic

indi

cato

r ta

rget

s es

tabl

ishe

d by

ORQ

R re

latin

g to

inst

itutio

nal

perfo

rman

ce

a. N

ote

on B

ank

perfo

rman

ces

(in

rela

tion

to d

imen

sion

s in

the

PCR)

Tim

e se

ries

Annu

al D

evel

opm

ent

Effe

ctive

ness

Rep

orts

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

59Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Sp

ecifi

c Qu

estio

ns

for S

eneg

alM

etho

dolo

gica

l Ap

proa

chM

ain

Indi

cato

rsNe

cess

ary

Data

Data

Sou

rces

Data

Col

lect

ion

Met

hods

Data

Ana

lysi

s M

etho

dsBa

nk's

In

stitu

tiona

l Pe

rform

ance

12. W

hat i

s th

e Ba

nk's

deg

ree

of

sele

ctivi

ty in

its

choi

ce

of o

pera

tions

in th

e co

untry

's p

ortfo

lio?

a. S

earc

h in

the

CSPs

po

ssib

le e

lem

ents

w

hich

sho

w th

at t

he

desi

gn h

as ta

ken

into

ac

coun

t the

sel

ectiv

ity

of in

vest

men

ts a

nd

spec

ific

mea

sure

s ta

ken

in th

is c

onte

xtb.

Iden

tify

the

pref

erre

d se

ctor

s w

hich

wer

e se

lect

ed

durin

g th

e de

sign

an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e CS

P ap

plyi

ng

sele

ctiv

ity a

nd

mea

surin

g th

eir

impo

rtanc

e in

the

Sene

gal p

ortfo

lio a

nd

its tr

end

over

the

perio

d in

term

s of

the

num

ber o

f ope

ratio

ns

and

volu

me

of

com

mitm

ents

Ongo

ing

disc

ussi

on o

n se

lect

ivity

in th

e CS

PFr

eque

ncy

CSP;

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

Sele

ctivi

ty m

easu

res

impl

emen

ted

Freq

uenc

yCS

PEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Li

st o

f mea

sure

s;

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m

Prop

ortio

n of

pro

ject

s in

prio

rity

or s

elec

ted

area

s (%

)

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

Fina

ncia

l im

porta

nce

of p

roje

cts

in p

riorit

y or

se

lect

ed s

ecto

rs in

the

portf

olio

(%)

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PPR

R; P

CRCa

lcul

atio

nsHi

stog

ram

13. W

hat i

s th

e le

vel

of c

ompl

emen

tarit

y of

inst

rum

ents

im

plem

ente

d in

the

CSP

and

syne

rgy

betw

een

publ

ic

and

priva

te s

ecto

r op

erat

ions

?

Coun

t the

num

ber o

f le

ndin

g an

d/or

gra

nt

oper

atio

ns th

at s

hare

co

mm

on o

bjec

tives

or

targ

et th

e sa

me

high

er

resu

lts, a

nd d

eter

min

e th

eir p

ropo

rtion

in

rela

tion

to th

e en

tire

portf

olio

Prop

ortio

n of

le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

sh

arin

g co

mm

on o

r si

mila

r dev

elop

men

t ob

ject

ives

or w

hich

ta

rget

the

sam

e hi

gher

re

sults

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

14. W

hat a

re th

e m

ain

drive

rs in

the

sele

ctio

n of

stra

tegi

c pr

iorit

ies

at c

ount

ry le

vel a

nd

have

they

cha

nged

ov

er ti

me?

a. In

terv

iew

the

mai

n ac

tors

in th

e co

untry

an

d in

the

Bank

team

an

d if

poss

ible

cro

ss-

chec

k ne

wsp

aper

ar

ticle

s.

List

of e

xpla

nato

ry

fact

ors

Freq

uenc

yCS

P: P

PRR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(cou

ntry

team

, go

vern

men

t and

pu

blic

adm

inis

tratio

ns,

priva

te s

ecto

r, ci

vil

soci

ety)

)

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

m


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

15. W

hat i

s th

e Ba

nk's

ef

fect

ivene

ss in

te

rms

of d

evel

opm

ent

partn

ersh

ips?

a. C

ount

the

num

ber

and

asse

ss th

e fin

anci

al im

porta

nce

of

partn

ersh

ips

of w

hich

th

e Ba

nk is

a m

embe

r in

Sen

egal

whe

ther

th

ey a

re in

itiat

ed o

r not

by

the

Bank

.

Num

ber o

f joi

nt

partn

ersh

ips

initi

ated

by

the

Bank

ove

r the

pe

riod

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; di

scus

sion

s w

ith

coun

try te

am

Curv

es

Prop

ortio

n of

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

the

portf

olio

in jo

int

partn

ersh

ips

(%)

Num

ber o

f ope

ratio

ns

in th

e ac

tive

portf

olio

ov

er th

e pe

riod

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rve

Fina

ncia

l im

porta

nce

of le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in

join

t par

tner

ship

s in

th

e po

rtfol

io (%

)

Amou

nt o

f co-

partn

ersh

ips

in th

e ac

tive

portf

olio

ove

r th

e pe

riod

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rve

Amou

nt o

f cofi

nanc

ing

in U

A in

vest

ed in

the

coun

try

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

mul

ative

his

togr

am

with

tren

d

Num

ber o

f co-

partn

ers

Tim

e se

ries

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

R; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

Prop

ortio

n of

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns w

ith th

e pr

ivate

sec

tor i

n th

e po

rtfol

io (%

)

Num

ber o

f ope

ratio

ns

with

priv

ate

sect

orCS

P; P

AR; P

PRR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

Fina

ncia

l im

porta

nce

of le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

w

ith th

e pr

ivate

sec

tor

in th

e po

rtfol

io (%

)

Num

ber o

f ope

ratio

ns

in th

e ac

tive

portf

olio

ov

er th

e pe

riod

CSP;

PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Hi

stog

ram

b. U

nder

scor

e th

e Ba

nk's

role

in th

e su

cces

s of

ope

ratio

ns

in S

eneg

al, p

artic

ular

ly by

impr

oved

m

onito

ring-

eval

uatio

n

a. %

of p

roje

cts

whi

ch

are

com

plia

nt in

term

s of

the

frequ

ency

of

supe

rvis

ion

mis

sion

s

Amou

nt o

f ope

ratio

ns

with

the

priva

te s

ecto

r in

the

activ

e po

rtfol

io

over

the

perio

d

CSP;

PAR

; PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

Amou

nt o

f cou

ntry

's

activ

e po

rtfol

ioCS

P; P

AR; P

PRR;

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Cum

ulat

ive h

isto

gram

w

ith tr

end

b. %

of p

roje

cts

revie

wed

(at m

id-t

erm

or

at c

ompl

etio

n),

join

tly w

ith th

e Go

vern

men

t

Num

ber o

f pro

ject

s th

at h

ave

subm

itted

qu

arte

rly re

ports

on

time

Quar

terly

repo

rts;

BTOR

of s

uper

visio

n m

issi

ons;

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

Tota

l num

ber i

n th

e po

rtfol

io o

ver t

he

perio

d

CSP;

PAR

; PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f eva

luat

ed

proj

ects

PPRR

; PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es

61Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

16. T

o w

hat e

xten

t ha

ve th

e Ba

nk's

kn

owle

dge

prod

ucts

in

fluen

ced

the

desi

gn

of th

e CS

P an

d op

erat

ions

and

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion?

a. R

evie

w th

e bi

blio

grap

hies

in

ex-a

nte

eval

uatio

n do

cum

ents

on

proj

ects

in

Sen

egal

and

cou

nt

the

num

ber o

f spe

cific

st

udie

s or

oth

er B

ank

know

ledg

e pr

oduc

ts

men

tione

d as

sou

rce

docu

men

ts.

b. In

terv

iew

the

acto

rs in

volve

d in

the

desi

gn o

f CSP

s an

d op

erat

ions

con

cern

ed

by th

e ev

alua

tion

Num

ber o

f inf

orm

atio

n se

ssio

ns o

rgan

ized

by

the

Bank

, inc

ludi

ng

radi

o an

d te

levis

ion

broa

dcas

ts

PPRR

; PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

co

untry

team

Curv

es/H

isto

gram

Num

ber o

f pub

licat

ions

di

ssem

inat

ed b

y th

e Ba

nk, i

nclu

ding

leafl

ets

PPRR

; PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

co

untry

team

Curv

es/H

isto

gram

Coun

t the

num

ber o

f se

ssio

ns o

rgan

ized

or p

ublic

atio

ns

diss

emin

ated

by

the

Bank

to s

hare

its

expe

rienc

e in

the

coun

try

Num

ber o

f ad

verti

sem

ents

in

loca

l new

spap

ers

and

mag

azin

es

Disc

ussi

ons

with

co

untry

team

Curv

es/H

isto

gram

Num

ber o

f vis

itors

to

the

Regi

onal

Offi

ce

libra

ry

SNFO

regi

ster

Curv

es/H

isto

gram

18. T

o w

hat e

xten

t ha

s th

e Ba

nk b

uilt

the

capa

citie

s an

d st

reng

then

ed th

e le

ader

ship

of t

he

gove

rnm

ent?

Num

ber o

f tec

hnic

al

capa

city

bui

ldin

g tra

inin

g se

ssio

ns

orga

nize

d

PCR;

Sup

ervis

ion

mis

sion

BTO

R; P

PRR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Curv

es/H

isto

gram

Num

ber o

f Go

vern

men

t pa

rtici

pant

s, in

clud

ing

the

num

ber o

f Di

rect

ors

and

Min

iste

rs

Repo

rtsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

;Cu

rves

/His

togr

am


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Bank

's

Inst

itutio

nal

Perfo

rman

ce

19. T

o w

hat e

xten

t ha

s th

e Ba

nk

succ

essf

ully

iden

tified

an

d pr

omot

ed th

e ad

optio

n of

inno

vativ

e im

plem

enta

tion

prac

tices

and

m

echa

nism

s?

Iden

tify

inno

vatio

ns

prop

osed

by

the

Bank

in

the

coun

try.

Exis

tenc

e of

inno

vativ

e Ba

nk p

ract

ices

or

mec

hani

sms

Freq

uenc

yCS

P; P

AR; P

CR;

Coun

try T

eam

Disc

ussi

ons;

ext

ract

ion

from

doc

umen

tatio

nFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Hi

stog

ram

20. W

hat r

espo

nses

ha

s th

e Ba

nk p

rovid

ed

to c

hang

es in

dem

and,

co

mpe

titio

n an

d do

nors

?

Iden

tify

adap

tatio

ns

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d by

the

Bank

in S

eneg

al to

ad

dres

s ch

ange

s in

th

e co

mm

unity

of

deve

lopm

ent p

artn

ers

Exis

tenc

e of

ada

ptat

ion

mea

sure

sFr

eque

ncy

CSP;

PPR

R; P

CR;

Coun

try T

eam

Disc

ussi

ons;

ext

ract

ion

from

doc

umen

tatio

nFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Hi

stog

ram

21. T

o w

hat e

xten

t ha

s th

e Ba

nk b

een

succ

essf

ul in

the

iden

tifica

tion,

co

mm

unic

atio

n an

d ad

optio

n of

bes

t pr

actic

es a

nd le

sson

s le

arne

d fro

m it

s ex

perie

nce?

?

22. T

o w

hat e

xten

t has

th

e Ba

nk c

ontri

bute

d to

stre

ngth

enin

g th

e re

sults

-bas

ed

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

in S

eneg

al?

Prop

ortio

n of

su

perv

isio

n m

issi

ons

carri

ed o

ut jo

intly

with

th

e Go

vern

men

t

Num

ber o

f joi

nt

mis

sion

s un

derta

ken

PCR;

PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

enta

tion

Curv

es

Tota

l num

ber o

f su

perv

isio

n m

issi

ons

unde

rtake

n du

ring

the

perio

d

PCR;

PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

enta

tion

Curv

es

63Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Gove

rnm

ent P

erfo

rman

ceEv

alua

tion

Crite

riaSp

ecifi

c Qu

estio

ns

for S

eneg

alM

etho

dolo

gica

l Ap

proa

chM

ain

Indi

cato

rsNe

cess

ary

Data

Data

Sou

rces

Data

Col

lect

ion

Met

hods

Data

Ana

lysi

s M

etho

dsGo

vern

men

t of

Sen

egal

's

Perfo

rman

ce

23. W

hat i

s th

e pe

rform

ance

of t

he

coun

try's

gov

ernm

ent

as a

dev

elop

men

t pa

rtner

s in

the

desi

gn,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of

resu

lts?

Use

CPIA

ratin

gs fo

r th

e co

untry

Coun

try p

erfo

rman

ce

note

(CPI

A di

men

sion

s)CP

IA 2

004-

2013

; De

velo

pmen

t Ef

fect

ivene

ss R

epor

ts

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nCu

rves

/His

togr

ams

Desc

ribe

the

role

of

the

Gove

rnm

ent

of S

eneg

al in

the

succ

ess

of o

pera

tions

, es

peci

ally

thro

ugh

impr

oved

mon

itorin

g-ev

alua

tion

a. F

requ

ency

of

Gov

ernm

ent

supe

rvis

ion

mis

sion

s

Tim

e se

ries

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

b. %

of p

roje

cts

with

up

date

d IP

RRs

Tim

e se

ries

PPRR

; PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nCu

rves

c. %

of p

roje

cts

with

PP

P or

PP

ratin

gsTi

me

serie

sPP

RR; P

CREx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

enta

tion

Curv

es

d. %

of p

roje

cts

with

qua

rterly

sta

tus

repo

rts s

ubm

itted

late

or

not

sub

mitt

ed

Tim

e se

ries

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nCu

rves

e. %

of p

roje

cts

revie

wed

(at m

id-t

erm

or

at c

ompl

etio

n),

join

tly w

ith th

e Ba

nk

Tim

e se

ries

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nCu

rves

f. %

of p

roje

cts

with

gov

ernm

ent

supe

rvis

ion

mis

sion

s

Tim

e se

ries

PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tatio

nCu

rves


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Gove

rnm

ent

of S

eneg

al's

Pe

rform

ance

24. T

o w

hat e

xten

t do

es th

e Go

vern

men

t co

nsul

t the

oth

er C

SP

stak

ehol

ders

, inc

ludi

ng

the

priva

te s

ecto

r and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty?

Outli

ne th

e di

vers

ity

of th

e ac

tors

invo

lved

(NGO

s, tr

ade

unio

ns

etc.

)

Num

ber o

f spe

cific

Af

DB G

roup

co

nsul

tatio

n m

eetin

gs

Tim

e se

ries

Coun

try T

eam

; at

tend

ance

she

ets

Disc

ussi

ons;

Ext

ract

ion

from

doc

umen

tatio

nHi

stog

ram

Dive

rsity

of s

egm

ents

of

soc

iety

invo

lved

in d

ialo

gue

rela

ting

to th

e de

sign

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e CS

P an

d op

erat

ions

co

ncer

ned

Freq

uenc

yCo

untry

Tea

m

and

gove

rnm

ent;

atte

ndan

ce s

heet

s

Disc

ussi

ons;

Ext

ract

ion

from

doc

umen

tatio

nFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; Hi

stog

ram

s/se

ctor

s

25. T

o w

hat e

xten

t do

es th

e Go

vern

men

t pl

ay a

lead

ersh

ip ro

le

in a

id c

oord

inat

ion/

harm

oniza

tion?

Exam

ine

the

func

tioni

ng o

f a

poss

ible

join

t dec

isio

n-m

akin

g fra

mew

ork

for d

evel

opm

ent

assi

stan

ce in

the

coun

try

Exis

tenc

e of

a

join

t dec

isio

n-m

akin

g fra

mew

ork

for d

evel

opm

ent

assi

stan

ce

DCEF

Disc

ussi

ons

with

pa

rties

Natio

nalit

y of

th

e co

ordi

natio

n co

mm

ittee

cha

irper

son

DCEF

Disc

ussi

ons

with

the

parti

es

Mod

aliti

es fo

r de

term

inin

g m

eetin

g ag

enda

s

Stag

es a

nd a

ctor

sDC

EF; a

dmin

istra

tive

docu

men

tsDi

scus

sion

with

the

parti

es; e

xtra

ctio

n fro

m d

ocum

enta

tion

Tabl

e; fl

ow c

hart

Othe

r Crit

eria

26. W

hat f

acto

rs h

ave

favo

ured

or h

ampe

red

the

achi

evem

ent o

f the

ex

pect

ed o

utco

mes

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

?

Iden

tify

the

rele

vant

ex

plan

ator

y va

riabl

es

thro

ugh

proj

ect

docu

men

ts (C

SP,

appr

aisa

l rep

orts

, QP

AR, a

nnua

l rep

orts

, au

dit r

epor

ts, P

CR,

PCR-

EN, M

TR, e

tc.)

and

anal

yze

thei

r im

pact

on

oper

atio

nal

perfo

rman

ces

List

of f

avou

rabl

e fa

ctor

s; li

st o

f un

favo

urab

le fa

ctor

s

Freq

uenc

yDS

P; P

PRR;

PCR

; Co

untry

Tea

mDi

scus

sion

s; E

xtra

ctio

n fro

m d

ocum

enta

tion

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

ms

65Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor a

nd R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

sEv

alua

tion

Crite

riaSp

ecifi

c Qu

estio

ns

for S

eneg

alM

etho

dolo

gica

l Ap

proa

chM

ain

Indi

cato

rsNe

cess

ary

Data

Data

Sou

rces

Data

Col

lect

ion

Met

hods

Data

Ana

lysi

s M

etho

dsEf

fect

ivene

ss3.

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed o

utco

mes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3a. %

of d

istri

cts

affe

cted

(reg

ions

, De

partm

ents

, m

unic

ipal

ities

, ar

rond

isse

men

ts)

Num

ber o

f dis

trict

s ta

rget

ed;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

Num

ber o

f dis

trict

s co

vere

dId

emId

emBe

nchm

arki

ng w

ith

othe

r sec

tor p

roje

cts

3b. N

umbe

r of

hous

ehol

ds/p

eopl

e co

vere

d

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

ls

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(targ

et g

roup

s,

expe

rts)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Desc

riptio

n

No, o

f res

ults

par

tially

ac

hiev

edPC

R; p

artie

s co

ncer

ned

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

clas

sific

atio

n;

Hist

ogra

m

No, o

f res

ults

fully

ac

hiev

edPC

R; p

artie

s co

ncer

ned

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

clas

sific

atio

n;

Hist

ogra

m


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

3.In

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

out

com

es in

th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Leve

l of O

utpu

ts3d

. Ton

nes

of c

rops

co

ncer

ned

prod

uced

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(ben

efici

arie

s, e

xper

ts);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3e. A

gric

ultu

ral y

ield

s (to

nnes

/ha)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3f. H

ecta

res

of

irrig

ated

land

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3g. %

of p

ost-

harv

est

loss

esHa

rves

ted

tonn

age;

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

tonn

es o

f har

vest

lost

(p

est a

ttack

s, e

tc.)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3h. %

of r

ural

farm

ers

usin

g m

oder

n in

puts

No. o

f far

mer

s in

the

targ

et a

reas

;Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

No. o

f far

mer

s af

fect

ed

by th

e pr

ojec

ts;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

No. o

f far

mer

s us

ing

mod

ern

inpu

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3i. P

ropo

rtion

of

irrig

ated

land

Irrig

ated

are

asEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3j. N

umbe

r of

prod

uctio

n an

d/or

m

arke

ting

faci

litie

s co

nstru

cted

or

reha

bilit

ated

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

67Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

3.In

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

out

com

es in

th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3k. I

rriga

ble

land

ar

ea d

evel

oped

or

reha

bilit

ated

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(ben

efici

arie

s, e

xper

ts);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3l. N

umbe

r of c

attle

va

ccin

ated

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3m. N

umbe

r of

seed

lings

and

/or

impr

oved

see

d di

strib

uted

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3n. T

onne

s of

ferti

lizer

di

strib

uted

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3o. N

umbe

r of

com

mun

ity-b

ased

pr

ojec

ts im

plem

ente

d

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3p. N

umbe

r of f

arm

ers

train

ed in

mod

ern

tech

niqu

es

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3q. N

umbe

r of r

ural

dw

elle

rs tr

aine

dEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Note

: The

defi

nitio

n an

d ch

oice

of i

ndic

ator

s dr

aws

on th

e GD

PRD

appr

oach

(200

8:23

) whi

ch is

focu

sed

on s

ervic

e de

liver

y. It

cons

ider

s th

at m

ost p

roje

cts

have

one

thin

g in

com

mon

: the

y ar

e es

sent

ially

veh

icle

s fo

r mak

ing

a pr

oduc

t or p

rodu

cts

avai

labl

e to

a ta

rget

pop

ulat

ion.

The

con

cept

of t

he “p

rodu

ct” i

s a

broa

d on

e, w

hich

may

incl

ude:

a ta

ngib

le p

rodu

ct s

uch

as a

loan

, a ru

ral r

oad,

or a

pac

kage

of t

echn

olog

ical

inno

vatio

ns fo

r inc

reas

ing

yield

s; a

ser

vice,

suc

h as

an

exte

nsio

n pr

ogra

m, l

ocal

hea

lth c

are,

or l

and

regi

stry

ser

vice;

som

ethi

ng m

ore

abst

ract

, suc

h as

“an

enab

ling

envir

onm

ent”

or a

“com

mun

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

roje

ct”.

For

the

proj

ect o

r pro

gram

to a

chie

ve it

s de

sire

d go

al, n

ot o

nly

mus

t the

pro

duct

be

som

ethi

ng th

at th

e ta

rget

pop

ulat

ion

wan

ts a

nd n

eeds

, but

the

deliv

ery

syst

em m

ust e

nsur

e th

at th

ey g

et it

. Fr

om th

e CE

DR q

uest

ions

it is

it is

then

pos

sibl

e to

gen

erat

e th

ree

basi

c in

dica

tors

: Acc

ess

– pe

rcen

tage

of t

he ta

rget

pop

ulat

ion

havin

g ac

cess

to th

e pr

ojec

t pro

duct

. Th

e te

rm “a

cces

s” h

as to

be

clea

rly d

efine

d. It

may

be

“tim

e ta

ken

to re

ach”

or “

dist

ance

” or p

ossi

bly

“abi

lity

to p

ay”.

Use

– pe

rcen

tage

of t

he ta

rget

pop

ulat

ion

that

use

s th

e pr

ojec

t pro

duct

. Si

mila

rly, t

he te

rm “u

se” h

as to

be

defin

ed. I

t co

uld

for i

nsta

nce

be “a

dopt

ion”

as

in “p

erce

nt o

f sm

allh

olde

rs a

dopt

ing

a pr

actic

e re

com

men

ded

by e

xten

sion

”. S

atis

fact

ion

– pe

rcen

tage

of u

sers

sat

isfie

d w

ith th

e pr

oduc

t. T

he m

easu

rem

ent o

f sat

isfa

ctio

n re

quire

s th

e co

nduc

t of a

wid

e su

rvey

. Give

n th

e CE

DR's

ope

ratio

nal c

onst

rain

ts, t

his

type

of s

urve

y is

no

t a p

ossi

ble

optio

n. C

onse

quen

tly, t

he a

cces

s an

d us

e in

dica

tors

wer

e re

tain

ed fo

r the

eva

luat

ion

fram

ewor

k fo

r the

Ban

k's

stra

tegi

es a

nd p

rogr

ams

in S

eneg

al.

Glob

al D

onor

Pla

tform

for R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t, GD

PRD,

FAO

and

Wor

ld B

ank,

200

8. T

rack

ing

resu

lts in

agr

icul

ture

and

rura

l dev

elop

men

t in

less

-tha

n-id

eal c

ondi

tions

: A s

ourc

eboo

k of

indi

cato

rs fo

r mon

itorin

g an

d ev

alua

tion.

ISBN

978

-92-

5-10

6082

-7, p

age

23.


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

3.In

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

out

com

es in

th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outc

ome

Leve

l3r

. Am

ount

of

agric

ultu

ral s

ubsi

dies

(X

OF)

Deve

lopm

ent

Coop

erat

ion

Repo

rt;

AfDB

and

Wor

ld B

ank

stat

istic

s po

rtals

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3s. P

ropo

rtion

of a

id

allo

cate

d to

agr

icul

ture

an

d ru

ral d

evel

opm

ent

(%)

DCEF

Rep

ort

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3t. A

gric

ultu

ral

prod

uctio

n gr

owth

ra

te (%

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3u. F

ood

prod

uctio

n gr

owth

rate

(%)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3v. N

umbe

r of d

irect

ru

ral j

obs

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3w. A

vera

ge g

row

th

rate

of t

arge

t ag

ricul

tura

l cro

p yie

lds

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3x. A

nnua

l vol

ume

of in

vest

men

ts in

ag

ricul

ture

ove

r the

pe

riod

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

69Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Soc

ial D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

cts

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3a. %

of d

istri

cts

affe

cted

(reg

ions

, De

partm

ents

, m

unic

ipal

ities

, ar

rond

isse

men

ts)

No. o

f dis

trict

s ta

rget

ed;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

No. o

f dis

trict

s af

fect

edId

emid

emBe

nchm

arki

ng w

ith

othe

r sec

tor p

roje

cts

3b. N

umbe

r of

hous

ehol

ds/p

eopl

e co

vere

d

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

lsPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(app

rais

al re

ports

, IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

parti

es c

once

rned

(ta

rget

gro

ups,

ex

perts

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Desc

riptio

n

No. o

f res

ults

par

tly

achi

eved

PCR;

par

ties

conc

erne

did

emFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

; cl

assi

ficat

ion;

Hi

stog

ram

No. o

f res

ults

fully

ac

hiev

edPC

R; p

artie

s co

ncer

ned

idem

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is

clas

sific

atio

n;

Hist

ogra

m

Outp

ut L

evel

Num

ber o

f new

sch

ool

enro

lmen

tsPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); na

tiona

l sec

tor s

tudi

es;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f tea

cher

s an

d su

ppor

t tea

cher

s re

crui

ted

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3t. N

umbe

r of h

ealth

ce

ntre

s (m

edic

al

cove

rage

)

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f hea

lth

cent

res

cons

truct

ed o

r re

habi

litat

ed

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outp

ut L

evel

Num

ber o

f equ

ippe

d he

alth

cen

tres

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

Num

ber o

f hea

lth

pers

onne

l tra

ined

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

Num

ber o

f hea

lth

pers

onne

l tra

inin

g se

ssio

ns

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

% o

f peo

ple

with

ac

cess

to a

hea

lth

cent

re

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

3r. N

umbe

r of

clas

sroo

ms/

scho

ols

cons

truct

ed o

r re

habi

litat

ed

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

natio

nal s

ecto

r stu

dies

;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

Num

ber o

f sch

ool t

ext

book

s pr

ovid

edPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); na

tiona

l sec

tor s

tudi

es;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

Outp

ut L

evel

3s. E

nrol

men

t Rat

ePr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); na

tiona

l sec

tor s

tudi

es;

natio

nal s

take

hold

ers

(exp

erts

, Min

istry

of

Road

s); A

fDB

and

Wor

ld B

ank

stat

istic

s po

rtals

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

71Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

Sect

or P

roje

cts

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3a. %

of d

istri

cts

affe

cted

(reg

ions

, De

partm

ents

, m

unic

ipal

ities

, ar

rond

isse

men

ts)

No. o

f dis

trict

s ta

rget

ed;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

No. o

f dis

trict

s af

fect

edPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(app

rais

al re

ports

, IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

3b. N

umbe

r of

hous

ehol

ds/p

eopl

e co

vere

d

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

lsPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(app

rais

al re

ports

, IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

parti

es c

once

rned

(ta

rget

gro

ups,

ex

perts

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Desc

riptio

n

No. o

f res

ults

par

tly

achi

eved

PCR;

par

ties

conc

erne

dEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; qui

ck

surv

ey (s

emi-

stru

ctur

ed d

iscu

ssio

ns)

with

sta

keho

lder

s

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

clas

sific

atio

n;

Hist

ogra

m

No. o

f res

ults

fully

ac

hiev

edPC

R; p

artie

s co

ncer

ned

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

clas

sific

atio

n;

Hist

ogra

m


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outp

ut L

evel

sNu

mbe

r of

wel

ls a

nd

bore

hole

s dr

illed

or

reha

bilit

ated

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(farm

ers,

exp

erts

)

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsHi

stog

ram

s/Cu

rves

Leng

th o

f drin

king

w

ater

pip

ing

cons

truct

ed

Tim

e se

ries

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Drin

king

wat

er

prod

uctio

n in

stal

led

capa

city

(m3)

Tim

e se

ries

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f lat

rines

co

nstru

cted

Tim

e se

ries

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f peo

ple

train

ed in

wat

er

supp

ly in

frast

ruct

ure

mai

nten

ance

Tim

e se

ries

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3w. N

umbe

r of

dom

estic

drin

king

w

ater

con

nect

ions

Tim

e se

ries

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

Outc

ome

Leve

ls3u

. % fe

mal

e in

habi

tant

s w

ith

acce

ss to

an

impr

oved

so

urce

of d

rinki

ng

wat

er

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(farm

ers,

exp

erts

); Af

DB a

nd W

orld

Ban

k st

atis

tics

porta

ls

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

3v. %

fem

ale

inha

bita

nts

with

ac

cess

to a

n im

prov

ed

sani

tatio

n sy

stem

Tim

e se

ries

idem

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Hist

ogra

ms/

Curv

es

73Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Ene

rgy

Sect

or P

roje

cts

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3a. %

of d

istri

cts

affe

cted

(reg

ions

, De

partm

ents

, m

unic

ipal

ities

, ar

rond

isse

men

ts)

No. o

f dis

trict

s ta

rget

ed;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Benc

hmar

king

with

ot

her s

ecto

r pro

ject

s

No. o

f dis

trict

s af

fect

edId

emid

emBe

nchm

arki

ng w

ith

othe

r sec

tor p

roje

cts

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(targ

et g

roup

s,

expe

rts);

DER

(201

3);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is:

Hist

ogra

ms

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

lsPC

Rid

emFr

eque

ncy

anal

ysis

: Hi

stog

ram

s

No. o

f res

ults

par

tly

achi

eved

PCR

idem

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is:

Hist

ogra

ms

Outp

ut L

evel

sNu

mbe

r of e

mpl

oyee

s in

clud

ing

expa

triat

esPr

ojec

t doc

umen

ts

(app

rais

al re

ports

, IP

RR, M

TR, P

CR);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Inst

alle

d el

ectri

c po

wer

ca

paci

ty (M

W)

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f per

sonn

el

train

ed in

mai

nten

ance

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Leng

ths

of li

nes

co

nstru

cted

and

/or

reha

bilit

ated

(km

)

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f tra

nsfo

rmer

s in

stal

led

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Annu

al n

umbe

r of

trans

form

er-r

elat

ed

inci

dent

s

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Num

ber o

f dis

tribu

tion

sub-

stat

ions

inst

alle

dPr

ojec

t doc

umen

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves


Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outp

ut L

evel

sNu

mbe

r of o

utag

es

per y

ear

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Aver

age

outa

ge ti

me

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Annu

al n

umbe

r of

days

with

out

ages

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Cum

ulat

ive a

nnua

l ou

tage

tim

ePr

ojec

t doc

umen

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Annu

al tu

rnov

erPr

ojec

t doc

umen

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Annu

al tu

rnov

erPr

ojec

t doc

umen

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Annu

al n

umbe

r of u

ser

clai

ms

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Annu

al a

mou

nt o

f ta

xes

and

dutie

s pa

id

to c

entra

l gov

ernm

ent

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Cum

ulat

ive a

mou

nt o

f ta

xes

and

dutie

s pa

id

to c

entra

l gov

ernm

ent

over

the

proj

ect p

erio

d

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Aver

age

mon

thly/

annu

al h

ouse

hold

sp

endi

ng o

n el

ectri

city

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Popu

latio

n su

pplie

d fro

m th

e el

ectri

c po

wer

grid

(inh

abs.

)

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

id

em E

xtra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

tsCu

rves

Num

ber o

f rur

al

com

mun

ities

cov

ered

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

3z. Q

uant

ity o

f re

new

able

ene

rgy

gene

rate

d (M

w)

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

75Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outc

ome

Leve

lsCu

rves

Perc

enta

ge o

f en

ergy

con

sum

ed b

y bu

sine

sses

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Num

ber o

f su

bscr

iber

s/ho

useh

olds

/bu

sine

sses

con

nect

ed

to th

e el

ectri

city

grid

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Num

ber o

f new

su

bscr

iber

s/ho

useh

olds

con

nect

ed

to th

e gr

id

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Prop

ortio

n of

co

mm

unity

in

frast

ruct

ure

(hea

lth

cent

res,

sch

ools

, m

arke

ts, e

tc.)

conn

ecte

d to

the

elec

tric

pow

er g

rid

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

3y. %

fem

ale

inha

bita

nts

with

ac

cess

to th

e el

ectri

c po

wer

grid

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

Ex

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rves

Rath

er th

an d

raw

ing

on th

e Ba

nk's

RM

F w

hich

doe

s no

t pro

pose

any

, the

indi

cato

rs re

tain

ed c

ome

from

Jos

eph

Mou

anda

(201

4). T

he s

elec

tion

crite

ria: (

i) cl

ear l

ikel

ihoo

d of

ens

urin

g th

e m

ost d

irect

link

with

the

obse

rved

por

tfolio

per

form

ance

; and

(ii)

likel

ihoo

d of

ava

ilabi

lity

of s

econ

dary

dat

a.


Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Gov

erna

nce

Proj

ects

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

3.In

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

upo

n ou

tcom

es

in th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-stru

ctur

ed

disc

ussi

ons

with

the

bene

ficia

ries

and

othe

r sta

keho

lder

s(d

) Com

pare

the

expe

cted

and

act

ual

outc

omes

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

ls;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

co

ncer

ned

(targ

et

grou

ps, e

xper

ts);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is;

Hist

ogra

ms

Num

ber o

f res

ults

pa

rtly

achi

eved

PC

R

Num

ber o

f res

ults

fully

ac

hiev

edPC

R

Outp

ut L

evel

s Se

e PA

RPC

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; qui

ck

surv

ey (s

emi-

stru

ctur

ed d

iscu

ssio

ns)

with

sta

keho

lder

s

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is

Hist

ogra

ms

77Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

3.In

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

upo

n ou

tcom

es

in th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outc

ome

Leve

lsQu

ality

of p

ublic

fin

ance

man

agem

ent

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar C

PIA/

AFDB

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(targ

et g

roup

s,

expe

rts);

Doin

g Bu

sine

ss re

port;

CPI

A;

DER;

AfD

B an

d W

orld

Ba

nk s

tatis

tics

porta

ls

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

Qual

ity o

f pub

lic

adm

inis

tratio

n: (i

) Co

ordi

natio

n an

d re

spon

sive

ness

of

pol

icie

s, (i

i) Se

rvic

e de

liver

y an

d op

erat

iona

l effi

cien

cy;

(iii)

Mer

it an

d et

hics

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar C

PIA/

AfDB

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

Qual

ity o

f bus

ines

s cl

imat

e: (a

) reg

ulat

ion

rela

ting

to e

ntry

, exit

an

d co

mpe

titio

n; (b

) re

gula

tion

rega

rdin

g to

the

cond

uct o

f bu

sine

ss; a

nd (c

) re

gula

tion

rela

ting

to th

e fa

ctor

s of

pr

oduc

tion

(labo

ur a

nd

land

).

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar C

PIA/

AfDB

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

3i. N

umbe

r of d

ays

requ

ired

to s

tart

a bu

sine

ss

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar t

he D

oing

Bu

sine

ss R

epor

t

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

Requ

ired

cost

to s

tart

a bu

sine

ss (

% G

NI/

inha

b)

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar C

PIA/

AfDB

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

3j. A

vera

ge s

core

on

the

scal

e (o

f eco

nom

ic

dive

rsifi

catio

n)

Scor

es o

btai

ned

from

di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar C

PIA/

AfDB

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

Hist

ogra

m

"The

eva

luat

ion

shou

ld c

ompa

re th

e ob

ject

ives

agre

ed u

pon

in th

e CS

Ps w

ith th

ose

of th

e pr

ojec

ts th

emse

lves.

In o

rder

to c

arry

out

an

anal

ysis

bet

wee

n th

e co

untri

es a

nd th

e ag

greg

atio

n be

twee

n th

e CS

PEs

and

CEDR

, som

e co

here

nce

is, h

owev

er, r

equi

red'

" (J

acks

on (2

014)

. Thi

s co

here

nce

will

depe

nd o

n w

heth

er th

e co

untry

in th

e CE

DR s

ampl

e ha

s a

gove

rnan

ce p

roje

ct o

r not

and

on

whe

ther

thes

e pr

ojec

ts h

ave

sim

ilar c

ompo

nent

s an

d ob

ject

ives

or n

ot.

The

prop

osed

indi

cato

rs a

re d

raw

n fro

m th

e CP

IA, t

he R

MF

and

the

ERD.


Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Reg

iona

l Int

egra

tion

and

Tran

spor

t Pro

ject

sEv

alua

tion

Crite

riaSp

ecifi

c Qu

estio

ns

for S

eneg

alM

etho

dolo

gica

l Ap

proa

chM

ain

Indi

cato

rsNe

cess

ary

Data

Data

Sou

rces

Data

Col

lect

ion

Met

hods

Data

Ana

lysi

s M

etho

dsEf

fect

ivene

ssIn

rela

tion

to th

e ag

reed

upo

n ou

tcom

es

in th

e di

ffere

nt C

SPs

wha

t wer

e th

e re

sults

of

the

Bank

's le

ndin

g an

d no

n-le

ndin

g op

erat

ions

in S

eneg

al

over

the

2004

-201

3 pe

riod?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outp

ut L

evel

sEx

iste

nce

of a

n in

terc

onne

cted

grid

be

twee

n co

untri

es o

f th

e su

b-re

gion

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR, P

CR);

AfDB

st

atis

tics

porta

l

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Kilo

met

res

of re

gion

al

road

s an

d co

rrido

rs

built

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR, P

CR);

AfDB

st

atis

tics

porta

l

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Leng

th o

f int

ra-

regi

onal

ele

ctric

pow

er

lines

con

stru

cted

or

reha

bilit

ated

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR, P

CR);

AfDB

st

atis

tics

porta

l

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Num

ber a

nd c

ost o

f re

gion

al in

tegr

atio

n pr

ogra

ms

(regi

onal

in

frast

ruct

ure,

trad

e fa

cilit

atio

n, e

cono

mic

di

vers

ifica

tion,

etc

.)

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR, P

CR);

AfDB

st

atis

tics

porta

l

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

Leng

th o

f dom

estic

as

phal

ted

road

ne

twor

k

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR, P

CR);

AfDB

st

atis

tics

porta

l

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

es

79Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outc

ome

Leve

lEx

iste

nce

of a

mixe

d pl

anni

ng a

nd/o

r m

anag

emen

t org

an/

plat

form

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Exis

tenc

e of

com

mon

st

anda

rds

for t

he

coun

tries

con

cern

ed

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Appl

icat

ion

of c

omm

on

norm

s an

d st

anda

rds

in th

e co

untri

es

conc

erne

d

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Num

ber o

f wor

kers

in

neig

hbou

ring

coun

tries

on

the

proj

ect/s

ite

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Curv

es

Volu

me

of tr

ade

with

co

untri

es o

f the

regi

on

and

also

of i

ntra

-Af

rican

trad

e

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Curv

es

Prop

ortio

n of

intra

-re

gion

al tr

ade

in th

e to

tal v

olum

e of

the

coun

try's

trad

e (%

)

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Curv

es

Tim

e ne

eded

for

a tru

ck to

tran

sit

a bo

rder

cro

ssin

g

(min

utes

)

Tim

e se

ries

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(P

AR P

CR);

Parti

es

conc

erne

d;

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts;

disc

ussi

ons

with

act

ors

and

adm

inis

tratio

ns

Curv

es

The

prop

osed

indi

cato

rs a

re d

raw

n fro

m s

ever

al s

ourc

es (a

) De

Lom

baer

de e

t al.

(201

1) q

uote

d in

Ann

ex 5

of t

he 2

5 No

vem

ber 2

014

Conc

ept N

ote;

(b) B

ank

Grou

p's

2014

to 2

023

Regi

onal

Inte

grat

ion

Stra

tegy

and

Pol

icy

(RIS

P) (N

ov. 2

014)

; (c)

Tab

les

1 (p

age

7) a

nd 2

(pag

e 10

) of t

he B

ank'

s Re

sults

M

easu

rem

ent F

ram

ewor

k (R

MF)

; and

(d) t

he e

xper

ienc

e of

the

eval

uatio

n te

am. T

he li

kelih

ood

of o

btai

ning

the

nece

ssar

y da

ta to

pro

vide

info

rmat

ion

for t

his

indi

cato

r was

a m

ajor

crit

erio

n in

the

deci

sion

for s

elec

ting

indi

cato

rs. F

urth

erm

ore

the

resu

lts o

btai

ned

on th

e ba

sis

of th

e ab

ove

indi

cato

rs re

pres

ent e

ither

pr

ojec

t effe

ctive

ness

or t

he B

ank'

s in

stitu

tiona

l per

form

ance

. The

y ap

pear

as

proj

ect e

ffect

ivene

ss w

here

regi

onal

inte

grat

ion

is o

ne o

f the

pro

ject

obj

ectiv

es (o

r is

an e

xpec

ted

outc

ome)

. Whe

re th

is is

not

the

case

, the

out

puts

rela

ting

to re

gion

al in

tegr

atio

n m

ay b

e co

nsid

ered

as

the

Bank

's p

erfo

rman

ce. I

ndee

d,

regi

onal

inte

grat

ion

form

s pa

rt of

the

inst

itutio

nal m

anda

te o

f the

Ban

k as

an

orga

niza

tion.

Con

sequ

ently

, the

eva

luat

ion

crite

rion

will

depe

nd o

n th

e re

al s

ituat

ion.


Effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Priv

ate

Sect

or P

roje

cts

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

3c. %

of r

esul

ts

achi

eved

List

of r

esul

ts a

nd

base

line

leve

ls;

Proj

ect d

ocum

ents

(a

ppra

isal

repo

rts,

IPRR

, MTR

, PCR

); pa

rties

con

cern

ed

(targ

et g

roup

s,

expe

rts);

DER

(201

3);

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts; q

uick

su

rvey

(sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

) w

ith s

take

hold

ers

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is:

Hist

ogra

ms

Num

ber o

f res

ults

pa

rtly

achi

eved

PC

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; qui

ck

surv

ey (s

emi-

stru

ctur

ed d

iscu

ssio

ns)

with

sta

keho

lder

s

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is:

Hist

ogra

ms

Num

ber o

f res

ults

fully

ac

hiev

edPC

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

; qui

ck

surv

ey (s

emi-

stru

ctur

ed d

iscu

ssio

ns)

with

sta

keho

lder

s

Freq

uenc

y an

alys

is:

Hist

ogra

ms

Outp

ut L

evel

sNu

mbe

r of p

rivat

e se

ctor

ope

ratio

ns in

po

rtfol

io

CSP;

PCR

; PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Hi

stog

ram

Tota

l vol

ume

of

com

mitm

ents

with

pr

ivate

sec

tor

CSP;

PCR

; PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

Outc

ome

Leve

ls3i

. Num

ber o

f day

s re

quire

d to

sta

rt a

busi

ness

Scor

es o

btai

ned

Doin

g Bu

sine

ss R

epor

tEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

Num

ber o

f exp

ort

docu

men

ts re

quire

dSc

ores

obt

aine

dDo

ing

Busi

ness

Rep

ort

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

e

Num

ber o

f im

port

docu

men

ts re

quire

dSc

ores

obt

aine

dDo

ing

Busi

ness

Rep

ort

Extra

ctio

n fro

m

docu

men

ts

Curv

e

Cum

ulat

ive tu

rnov

er o

f bu

sine

sses

fina

nced

PCR;

PPR

R; P

roje

ct

docu

men

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

81Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Eval

uatio

n Cr

iteria

Spec

ific

Ques

tions

fo

r Sen

egal

Met

hodo

logi

cal

Appr

oach

Mai

n In

dica

tors

Nece

ssar

y Da

taDa

ta S

ourc

esDa

ta C

olle

ctio

n M

etho

dsDa

ta A

naly

sis

Met

hods

Effe

ctive

ness

In re

latio

n to

the

agre

ed u

pon

outc

omes

in

the

diffe

rent

CSP

s w

hat w

ere

the

resu

lts

of th

e Ba

nk's

lend

ing

and

non-

lend

ing

oper

atio

ns in

Sen

egal

ov

er th

e 20

04-2

013

perio

d?

Com

bina

tion

of

met

hods

:(a

) Lis

t the

mai

n ou

tcom

es p

rese

nted

in

the

PCRs

, QPA

R an

d M

TR(b

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

by

dire

ct

obse

rvat

ion

in th

e pr

ojec

t are

a;(c

) Ide

ntify

the

resu

lts

obta

ined

thro

ugh

sem

i-st

ruct

ured

dis

cuss

ions

w

ith th

e be

nefic

iarie

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

(d) C

ompa

re th

e ex

pect

ed a

nd a

ctua

l ou

tcom

es

Outc

ome

Leve

lsCu

mul

ative

am

ount

of

priv

ate

sect

or c

o-fin

anci

ng

CSP;

PCR

; PPR

REx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

% o

f cum

ulat

ive

priva

te s

ecto

r co-

finan

cing

CSP;

PCR

; PPR

RCa

lcul

atio

nsHi

stog

ram

Tota

l vol

ume

of ta

xes

paid

to g

over

nmen

t by

busi

ness

es fi

nanc

ed

DCEF

MEF

adm

inis

trativ

e do

cum

ents

; Di

scus

sion

s w

ith

auth

oriti

es

Curv

e

3j. A

vera

ge s

core

on

the

scal

e (o

f eco

nom

ic

dive

rsifi

catio

n)

Scor

es o

btai

ned

CPIA

/AfD

BEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

Num

ber o

f dire

ct a

nd

indi

rect

jobs

cre

ated

PCR;

PPR

R; p

roje

ct

docu

men

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

Num

ber o

f wom

en

empl

oyed

PCR;

PPR

R; P

roje

ct

docu

men

tsEx

tract

ion

from

do

cum

ents

Cu

rve

The

Bank

's 2

008

Stra

tegy

Pap

er s

et o

ut th

e fo

llow

ing

five

deve

lopm

ent p

riorit

ies

for i

ts o

pera

tions

: (i)

impr

ove

the

busi

ness

clim

ate;

(ii)

supp

ort p

rivat

e en

terp

rises

; (iii)

stre

ngth

en th

e fin

anci

al s

yste

ms;

(iv)

con

stru

ct c

ompe

titive

infra

stru

ctur

e, a

nd (v

) pro

mot

e re

gion

al in

tegr

atio

n an

d tra

de (I

DEV,

201

4, B

ackg

roun

d No

te fo

r Eva

luat

ing

Priva

te S

ecto

r Ope

ratio

ns -

CED

R). T

he p

ropo

sed

indi

cato

rs a

re a

lso

draw

n fro

m th

e De

velo

pmen

t Effe

ctive

ness

Rep

ort f

or S

eneg

al (2

013)

. In

addi

tion,

the

appr

aisa

l rep

orts

of t

he p

roje

cts

conc

erne

d w

ill pr

ovid

e th

e pl

anne

d lis

t of s

peci

fic in

dica

tors

.


Ann

ex 3

: Rec

ons

titut

ed T

heo

ries

of C

hang

e

Tran

spor

t

Faci

litat

ed a

cces

s to

bas

ic s

ocia

l and

ec

onom

ic s

ervic

es (s

choo

ls, h

ealth

ce

nter

s, m

arke

ts, fi

nanc

ial s

ervic

es, e

tc.)

Incl

usive

Gro

wth

Incr

ease

d st

ate

reve

nues

Regi

onal

inte

grat

ion

faci

litat

ed

Cont

aine

r ter

min

al p

roje

ct

Redu

ced

trans

port

cost

sRe

duce

d op

erat

ing

cost

s of

veh

icle

s

Rura

l tow

ns o

pene

d up

and

cou

ntry

co

nnec

ted

Auto

nom

ous

road

mai

nten

ance

fund

in

pla

ce

Effe

ctive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

Road

net

wor

k cl

assi

fied

aver

age

/ roa

d in

goo

d co

nditi

on in

crea

ses

Exte

nded

life

time

of tr

ansp

ort i

nfra

stru

c-tu

reM

ore

Attra

ctive

Eco

nom

y

Tim

e sa

ving

Incr

ease

d Tr

ansp

ort o

f mer

chan

dise

an

d pe

ople

Daka

r-Di

amni

adio

Tol

l hig

hway

Redu

ced

cong

estio

n

Bord

er ro

ads

built

/ re

habi

litat

ed

Expa

ndin

g in

com

e-ge

nera

ting

activ

ities

83Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Publ

ic G

over

nanc

e Re

form

Resu

lts-B

ased

Pu

blic

Man

age-

men

ts PARE

PAM

OCA

PARE

VOLO

pro

ject

PACI

CEPA

DPS

PPC/

PNDL

Effe

ctive

Pro

gres

s in

Pov

erty

Re

duct

ion

Incr

ease

d pr

ivate

se

ctor

par

ticip

atio

n

Faci

litat

ion

of

SME

acce

ss to

ba

nk c

redi

t and

fin

anci

ng

Faci

litat

ion

of

SME

acce

ss to

pu

blic

con

tract

s

Faci

litat

ion

of

priva

te s

ecto

r ac

cess

to c

redi

t an

d fin

anci

ng

Netw

orks

of

co

mm

unity

fe

eder

ro

ads

built

Cont

inuo

us

mai

nte-

nanc

e of

ru

ral r

oads

Loca

l pro

ject

man

agem

ent c

apac

ities

built

up

Incr

ease

d m

arke

ting

of ru

ral

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n

Acce

lera

ted

and

Incl

usive

Gr

owth

Incr

ease

d ce

ntra

l go

vern

men

t rev

enue

Impr

oved

m

onito

ring

of

publ

ic p

olic

ies

Relia

ble

soci

o-ec

onom

ic

stat

istic

al

info

rmat

ion

avai

labl

e

Road

mai

n-te

nanc

e bu

dget

av

aila

ble

Data

ava

ilabl

e on

SM

E ris

ks

Incr

ease

d SM

E pa

rtici

patio

n

Capa

citie

s of

SM

Es

and

bank

ing

inst

itutio

ns

built

up

Cour

t dec

isio

ns

exec

uted

with

in

9 m

onth

s

PAAS

PPA

RE

Grow

th o

f w

omen

's

and

yout

h en

trepr

eneu

rshi

p

Adm

inis

trativ

e ca

paci

ties

built

up

Tran

spar

ent a

dmin

is-

trativ

e pr

actic

es a

nd

proc

edur

es

Drop

in

the

num

ber

of d

irec-

tly n

e-go

tiate

d co

ntra

cts

Cust

oms

clea

ranc

e tim

e sh

orte

ned

Tax

base

br

oade

-ne

d

Land

title

ac

quis

i-tio

n tim

e re

duce

d to

4 m

on-

ths

Publ

ic a

dmin

istra

tions

pro

vidin

g bu

sine

ss s

ervic

es im

prov

ed


Agric

ultu

re a

nd R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t

Incr

ease

d ag

ricul

tura

l and

rura

l inco

mes

Num

ber o

f cat

tle in

crea

sed

Food

sec

urity

PAPI

L

PASA

/LOU

MAK

AFPA

DERB

A

PADE

RCA

PPC/

PNIR

PREF

ELAG

Cattl

e po

nds

cons

truct

ed

6 71

9 Ha

of

sur

face

ar

ea

sow

n

Daily

dai

ry

prod

uctio

n at

0.8

litre

s (1

,776

,000

lit

res)

41 1

63 T

of

cer

eals

in

201

4

Reco

very

of

econ

omic

ac

tiviti

es a

roun

d La

ke G

uier

s

3525

T o

f ve

geta

bles

pr

oduc

ed

in 2

014

1206

.4 k

m o

f rur

al ro

ads

in 8

4 co

mm

unitie

s ar

e co

nstru

cted

Capa

cities

of s

tock

bree

der

asso

ciatio

n bu

ilt up

Wat

er

man

agem

ent

infra

stru

ctur

e bu

ilt (w

etla

nds

and

irrig

ated

ar

eas

deve

lope

d,

dike

s an

d ca

nals

)

Sust

aina

ble

reso

urce

m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

s

Pove

rty re

duce

d

PAPI

L

Anti-

salt

dike

s,

prot

ectio

n di

kes

Prod

uctiv

e an

d ec

ologi

cal c

apita

l pr

eser

ved

and/

or im

prov

ed27

9 au

tono

mou

s an

d op

erat

ional

gr

oupi

ngs

at

end

Mar

ch

Agro

-pas

tora

l pro

duct

ion s

yste

ms

adap

ted

to

clim

ate

chan

ge

86%

incr

ease

in a

gric

ultu

ral

prod

uctio

n (ri

ce, c

erea

ls,

vege

tabl

es, e

tc.)

Prod

uctio

n ar

eas

open

ed

up

Incr

ease

d m

arke

ting

of a

gricu

ltura

l pro

duct

ion

3635

inte

nsifi

ed

mixe

d fa

rms

esta

blis

hed

(fatte

ning

, br

eede

rs)

PAPE

L II

PROG

EBE

98%

of

ende

mic

ca

ttle

Prod

uctiv

ity

on th

e ba

sis

of w

eigh

t up

to 4

4.9

kg fo

r ca

ttle,

14

kg fo

r sh

eep

and

15.2

kg

for g

oats

Vuln

erab

ility o

f agr

icultu

ral a

nd ru

ral a

ctivi

ties

redu

ced

5723

Ha

of la

nd

recla

imed

or

rege

nera

ted

85Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Ener

gy

117

phot

ovol

taic

sy

stem

s in

stal

led

Elec

tric

pow

er

avai

labl

e to

bus

ines

ses

104

batte

ries

and

8 ch

argi

ng

mod

ules

1091

km

of

MV/

LV li

nes

104

trans

form

ers

stat

ions

inst

alle

d

Acce

lera

ted

and

incl

usive

gro

wth

Regu

lato

ry

capa

citie

s st

reng

then

edIn

crea

sed

elec

tric

pow

er g

ener

atio

n

Grid

per

form

ance

im

prov

ed

Redu

ctio

n in

cos

t pr

ice

of e

lect

ricity

Redu

ctio

n in

co

nsum

er p

rice

of e

lect

ricity

Econ

omic

Ref

orm

Su

ppor

t Pro

ject

(P

ARE)

Koun

oune

Send

ou p

roje

ct

ASER

offi

ces

oper

atio

nal

Rura

l Ele

ctrifi

catio

n Pr

ojec

t

Elec

tric

pow

er

avai

labl

e in

rura

l are

as

Acce

ss to

bas

ic ru

ral s

ervic

esRu

ral i

ncom

e-ge

nera

ting

activ

ities

275

villa

ges

conn

ecte

d to

ele

ctric

ity g

rids

6 el

ectri

c po

wer

ge

nera

tion

ther

mal

pla

nts

Elec

tric

pow

er

gene

ratio

n st

atio

ns


Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

Incr

ease

d in

com

e-ge

nera

ting

activ

ities

Incr

ease

d gi

rls

enro

lmen

t

Indi

vidua

l con

nect

ions

in

crea

sed

DWS

netw

ork

com

mun

ity

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

oper

atio

nal (

ASUF

OR)

DWS

infra

stru

ctur

e es

tabl

ishe

d (b

oreh

oles

, pum

ps

netw

orks

etc

)

Incr

ease

d qu

antit

y of

ferti

lizer

, gas

and

re

usab

le w

ater

from

dr

aine

d sl

udge

Acce

ss to

impr

oved

la

trine

sAc

cess

to d

rinki

ng w

ater

Deco

ncen

trate

d pu

blic

ser

vice

capa

citie

s bu

ilt u

p

Redu

ctio

n in

the

prev

alen

ce o

f wat

er

and

hygi

ene-

rela

ted

dise

ases

Sens

itiza

tion

cam

paig

ns

(com

mun

icat

ion

for c

hang

e)

Fam

ily la

trine

s an

d w

ash

tubs

co

nstru

cted

Trea

tmen

t pla

nt

reha

bilit

ated

Publ

ic la

vato

ries

(latri

nes)

bui

ltW

aste

wat

er

pum

ping

sys

tem

co

nstru

cted

/re

habi

litate

d

Mem

ber t

rain

ing

sess

ions

Incr

ease

d pr

oduc

tion

conn

ectio

nsCo

ntin

uous

drin

king

w

ater

sup

ply

Equi

pmen

t

87Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Soci

al D

evel

opm

ent

Heal

th II

Educ

atio

n IV

Sens

itiza

tion

cam

paig

ns

for w

omen

Heal

th

pers

onne

l re

crui

ted

Heal

th c

are

esta

blis

hmen

ts

equi

pped

Healt

h ca

re

esta

blish

men

ts

(hos

pita

ls po

sts,

cent

res)

co

nstru

cted

Redu

ction

in

mor

bidi

ty an

d m

orta

lity

Appr

opria

te

prac

tices

are

ad

opte

d es

pecia

lly

by w

omen

Incr

ease

d ac

cess

to

educ

ation

Acad

emic

pe

rform

ance

s of

stu

dent

s im

prov

ed

Educ

ation

al

cond

itions

im

prov

ed

Incr

ease

d in

take

cap

acity

Scho

ol

textb

ooks

di

strib

uted

Teac

hers

re

-train

ed

(train

ed)

Build

ing

proje

cts

finan

ced

Man

a-ge

men

t ca

pacit

y im

prov

edAd

ditio

nal

class

room

s co

nstru

cted

Girls

edu

catio

n pr

omot

ion

cam

paig

ns

Healt

h ca

re q

uality

im

prov

edIn

crea

sed

acce

ss

to h

ealth

ser

vices

Broa

der

terri

toria

l co

vera

ge b

y he

alth

syst

em

Gros

s en

rolm

ent r

ate

incr

ease

d,

espe

cially

of

girls

Healt

h pe

rson

nel

and

serv

ice

prov

ider

s tra

ined

Impr

oved

qua

lity

of h

uman

reso

urce

s


Annex 4: Administrative Map of Senegal

Matam

Mauritania

Mali

GuineaGuinea-Bissau

Tambacounda

Kédougou

Kolda

SedhiouZiguinchor

Kaolack

Fatick

Kaolack

Diourbel

LinguèreKébémer

Thiès

Mbour

Louga

Saint-Louis

Podor

Richard-Toll DaganaThillé-Boubacar

Dodji

Barkedji

Yang-Yang

Dahra

Sagatta-Diolof

Darou-Mousty

SagattaNdande

Mérina-Dakhar

Baba-Garage

LambayeBambey Ndoulo

Mbécké Ndame

Colobane

GossasNiakhar

DiakhaoGandiaye

SibassorFimela

FoundiougneDjilor

Sokone

Toubakouta

Banjul

Niodior

Tattaguine OuadiourGuinguineo

Mbadakhoune

KoumbalNdoffane

Ndiédieng

Wack-Ngouna Nioro Médina-

Sbakh

Paos-Koto

Kahone BirkelaneKaffrineMalem-Hodar Maka-Yop

KoungheulNganda

KaelNgoye

Ndindy

Niakhéne

MekheMéouane

Tivaouane

KhomboleThiénaba

NotoFissel

Sessène

Pout

SindiaNguékokh

Joal

Pambal

Thilogne

OurossoguiOgo

Sinthiou-Bamambé

Orkadièrè

Lemmé

Bakel

Kidira

Goudiry

Bala

Missitah

Koussanar

Maka

VélingaraBonconto

Kounkané

Pakour

Dabo

Dioulacolon

Médina-Yoro-Foulah

BounkilingDiouloulou

Sindian

BignonaThionck-Essyl

Tendouck Tenghory

NiaguisNyassiaOussouye

Kabrousse

Loudia-Ouolof

Diende

Tanaff

Marsassoum

Goudomp

Diattacounda

Djibabouya

Koumpentoum

Simenti

SalémataBandafassi

Fongolimbi

Saraya

Dlawara

Kanel

Gamadji-Sarré

Ndioum

Cascas

GollereSaldé

Agnam-Civol

MbaneRoss Béthio

DakarRunsque

Pikine

Gambia

Source: http://carte-du-monde.fr/tag-senegal.html, May 2014

89Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Annex 5: Results Framework for Bank's Strategy in Senegal (2002–2004)

Pillars Pillar 1: Poverty Reduction Pillar 2: Improvement of Human Resource Quality

Pillar 3: Sustainable growth focused on private initiative

Outcomes Reduction in the vulnerability of agricultural activities and rural development

Consolidation of macroeconomic framework

Outputs

Activities/Operations

Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Project for UA 14.31 million

Health Project II for UA 11.35 million Project for Support to the Directorate of Forecasts and Statistics and to the PRSP Monitoring Unit for UA 1.55 million

Livestock Sub-sector Development Study for UA 0.79 million

Education IV project for UA 14.84 million

Private Sector Adjustment Support Program for UA 24 million

Rural Electrification Project for an amount of UA 9.58 million

Inputs/Resources

Net commitments of UA 76.42 million

Source: AfDB. 2004. 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper as updated in 2004, OCCW, Document no. ADF/BD/WP/2003/26/Add.2 and ADB/BD/WP/2003/30/Add.2 of 9 August 2004.


Ann

ex 6

: 200

5-20

09 R

esul

ts-B

ased

CS

P F

ram

ewo

rkPi

llars

Pilla

r I: I

mpr

ovem

ent o

f the

bus

ines

s en

viro

nmen

t to

acce

lera

te g

row

thPi

llar I

I: Re

info

rcem

ent o

f Bas

ic In

fras

truc

ture

Sect

ors

Gove

rnan

ceAg

ricul

ture

&

Rura

l De

velo

pmen

t

Wat

er a

nd

Sani

tatio

nEn

ergy

Soci

al S

ecto

rTr

ansp

ort

Impa

cts

Budg

et

man

agem

ent

and

awar

d of

pu

blic

con

tract

s ar

e tra

nspa

rent

Exec

utio

n of

co

urt d

ecis

ions

do

es n

ot

exce

ed 9

m

onth

s

Doub

ling

of

num

ber o

f lan

d tit

le d

eeds

pr

oduc

ed a

nd

dist

ribut

ed

Reco

very

of

prod

uctiv

e ac

tiviti

es in

Ca

sam

ance

Outc

omes

20%

of

cont

ract

s w

ere

awar

ded

by d

irect

ne

gotia

tion

in

2007

The

MTE

F of

the

four

pr

iorit

y se

ctor

s op

erat

iona

l in

2007

The

time

requ

ired

to

obta

in a

land

tit

le d

eed

redu

ced

from

4

year

s to

1 y

ear

in 2

007

Priva

te s

ecto

r co

ntrib

utio

n to

GD

P ris

es to

72

.5%

in 2

007

and

to 7

8% in

20

09;

Acce

ss to

sa

fe d

rinki

ng

wat

er w

ithin

15

min

utes

is

42.5

% in

rura

l ar

eas

in 2

007

rises

to 4

5% in

20

09

Acce

ss to

m

edic

al

serv

ices

and

to

prim

ary

scho

ol

with

in 3

0 m

inut

es ri

ses

to

78.5

% in

200

7

The

clas

sifie

d ro

ad n

etw

ork

in a

vera

ge a

nd

good

con

ditio

n in

crea

ses

by

1.5

poin

ts in

20

07

Use

of

the

dire

ct

nego

tiatio

n m

etho

d be

cam

e a

n ex

cept

ion

in

2009

The

time

requ

ired

to

obta

in a

land

tit

le d

eed

redu

ced

to 4

m

onth

s

The

grow

th ra

te

rises

to 7

% in

20

07 a

nd 8

%

in 2

009

Acce

ss to

m

edic

al

serv

ices

and

to

prim

ary

scho

ol

with

in 3

0 m

inut

es ri

ses

to

80%

in 2

009

The

clas

sifie

d ro

ad n

etw

ork

in a

vera

ge a

nd

good

con

ditio

n in

crea

ses

by 3

po

ints

in 2

009

Outp

uts

Diam

niad

io

deve

lopm

ent

hub

is

esta

blis

hed

Activ

ities

/Op

erat

ions

Cont

inui

ng

impl

emen

tatio

n of

PAA

SP

Priva

te

Sect

or a

nd

Gove

rnan

ce

Supp

ort

Proj

ects

II

and

III

PAM

OCA

Casa

man

ce

Proj

ect

Wat

er In

itiat

ive

Proj

ect

Rura

l El

ectri

ficat

ion

Proj

ect

Educ

atio

n Pr

ojec

t IV

Road

M

aint

enan

ce

Proj

ect (

PER)

91Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Sour

ce: A

fDB,

Sen

egal

– 2

005-

2009

Cou

ntry

Stra

tegy

Pap

er, D

ocum

ent n

o. A

DF/B

D/W

P/20

05/6

5/Re

v., p

age

35

Pilla

rsPi

llar I

: Im

prov

emen

t of t

he b

usin

ess

envi

ronm

ent t

o ac

cele

rate

gro

wth

Pilla

r II:

Rein

forc

emen

t of B

asic

Infr

astr

uctu

reSe

ctor

sGo

vern

ance

Agric

ultu

re

& Ru

ral

Deve

lopm

ent

Wat

er a

nd

Sani

tatio

nEn

ergy

Soci

al S

ecto

rTr

ansp

ort

Edib

le O

il Pr

oduc

tion

Proj

ect

Kouo

une

Elec

tric

Pow

er

Plan

t Pro

ject

Heal

th P

roje

ct II

Kita

-Kat

i-Sa

raya

-Ke

doug

ou

(Mal

i/Sen

egal

) M

ultin

atio

nal

Road

Pro

ject

Smal

l-sca

le

Irrig

atio

n Pr

ojec

t (PA

PIL)

Ross

o M

ultin

atio

nal

Brid

ge

Cons

truct

ion

Proj

ect

(Sen

egal

/M

aurit

ania

)

Inpu

ts/

Reso

urce

s


Annex 7A: Results-Based Logical Framework of 2010-2015 CSP (Pillar 1)Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/

Agro-IndustryTourism Mines

Impacts Build the capacities of financial administrations to fully enforce the provisions of the Decree determining the timetable and methods for budget preparation

Assist MEF with preparation of new budget regulatory provisions to be introduced in the General Regulations on Public Accounting (RGCP)

Support implementation of Paris Declaration recommendations

Contribute to the standardization of administration's taxpayer database in order to use the tax identifier as a key for exchanges of information

Support implementation of the reform of the Court of Auditors and the project to build its capacities

Complete the establishment of the institutional framework by deploying it to the 4 regional hubs (St Louis, Ziguinchor, Kaolack and Thiès) and ensuring widespread use of SYGMAP

Improve Senegal's Doing Business ranking and build the capacities of judicial structures

Reduce administrative red tape and the technical constraints of business law and social legislation

Support the reorganization of the horticultural sub-sector as part of the horticultural production and export development and diversification plan

Support the establishment of an attractive legal and tax framework for investmentsand the review of provisions governing tourism and hotel management

Help to organize gold panners in SMEs

Help to streamline the management of natural resource exploitation rights

Outcomes SMTEF for 15 new ministries between 2009 and 2012

The new budget regulatory provisions transposed in the RGCP enter into force

Legal texts are adopted on procedures for the budget execution and control of autonomous agencies, public and decentralized administrations

Establishment of the single tax identifier file

The revision work on the legal texts on the operating modalities of the Court of Auditors are finalized no later than 2012

Under 20% of all public contracts awarded by direct agreement including those of the autonomous agencies

Coverage by private offices rises from 0 to Sub-Saharan African countries’ average (1.5)

Exports of 37,000 T of fruit and vegetables in 2012 and 75, 000 T in 2015

VAT on tourism activities is 10% in 2012 compared to 18% in 2010

Gold panners are organized in SMEs in 2012

The comparative study is completed in 2012


SIGFIP and ASTER software are interfaced

Branch funds must be deposited at the Treasury (single Treasury account)

The national identification number of enterprisesand associations is placed online to facilitate the issuance of NINEA’s administrative document and the deployment of the system in the services of ANSD, DGID and APIX

Institutional support to the Court of Auditors is effective

Restriction abolished relating to the participation of community-based enterprises

Reduce timeframes for tax formalities from 666 days to 306 days (African average) in 2012 and from 306 to 194 days (OECD average) in 2015

The Senegal destination is attractive and the number of entries rises from 800,000 in 2009 to 2 million in 2015

Gold panner yields have improved in 2015

The study recommendations are implemented in 2015

The credit freezing function is activated in SIGFIP

Monthly entry of expenditure on external resources in SIGFIP

Financial autonomy of ARMP is guaranteed by the issuance of an Order determining the fee and the modalities for its collection

Reduce contract execution periods from 780 to 643 days (African average) in 2012 and 643 to 462 days (OECD average) in 2015

Outcomes The practice of quarterly commitment plans is institutionalized

SIGFIP and investment expenditure monitoring software are interfaced

The management of exploitations rights are streamlined in 2015

93Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/


Impacts Build the capacities of financial administrations to fully enforce the provisions of the Decree determining the timetable and methods for budget preparation

Assist MEF with preparation of new budget regulatory provisions to be introduced in the General Regulations on Public Accounting (RGCP)

Support implementation of Paris Declaration recommendations

Contribute to the standardization of administration's taxpayer database in order to use the tax identifier as a key for exchanges of information

Support implementation of the reform of the Court of Auditors and the project to build its capacities

Complete the establishment of the institutional framework by deploying it to the 4 regional hubs (St Louis, Ziguinchor, Kaolack and Thiès) and ensuring widespread use of SYGMAP

Improve Senegal's Doing Business ranking and build the capacities of judicial structures

Reduce administrative red tape and the technical constraints of business law and social legislation

Support the reorganization of the horticultural sub-sector as part of the horticultural production and export development and diversification plan

Support the establishment of an attractive legal and tax framework for investmentsand the review of provisions governing tourism and hotel management

Help to organize gold panners in SMEs

Help to streamline the management of natural resource exploitation rights


The new budget regulatory provisions transposed in the RGCP enter into force

Legal texts are adopted on procedures for the budget execution and control of autonomous agencies, public and decentralized administrations

Establishment of the single tax identifier file

The revision work on the legal texts on the operating modalities of the Court of Auditors are finalized no later than 2012

Under 20% of all public contracts awarded by direct agreement including those of the autonomous agencies

Coverage by private offices rises from 0 to Sub-Saharan African countries’ average (1.5)

Exports of 37,000 T of fruit and vegetables in 2012 and 75, 000 T in 2015

VAT on tourism activities is 10% in 2012 compared to 18% in 2010

Gold panners are organized in SMEs in 2012

The comparative study is completed in 2012


SIGFIP and ASTER software are interfaced

Branch funds must be deposited at the Treasury (single Treasury account)

The national identification number of enterprisesand associations is placed online to facilitate the issuance of NINEA’s administrative document and the deployment of the system in the services of ANSD, DGID and APIX

Institutional support to the Court of Auditors is effective

Restriction abolished relating to the participation of community-based enterprises

Reduce timeframes for tax formalities from 666 days to 306 days (African average) in 2012 and from 306 to 194 days (OECD average) in 2015

The Senegal destination is attractive and the number of entries rises from 800,000 in 2009 to 2 million in 2015

Gold panner yields have improved in 2015

The study recommendations are implemented in 2015

The credit freezing function is activated in SIGFIP

Monthly entry of expenditure on external resources in SIGFIP

Financial autonomy of ARMP is guaranteed by the issuance of an Order determining the fee and the modalities for its collection

Reduce contract execution periods from 780 to 643 days (African average) in 2012 and 643 to 462 days (OECD average) in 2015

Outcomes The practice of quarterly commitment plans is institutionalized

SIGFIP and investment expenditure monitoring software are interfaced

The management of exploitations rights are streamlined in 2015




Outcomes The ASTER software perimeter covers all the accounting items

Monthly budget execution statements by Ministry and title and in the 4 phases of the expenditure circuit are published on the MEF web site and accessible to the general public

Outputs


Budget support I (PASRP I)

Budget Support I (PASRP I)




Local small-scale irrigation project (PAPIL)

Budget support II (PASRP II)

Budget Support II (PASRP II)


Budget Support I I (PASRP II)


PAPIL Supplementary Loan

Budget support III (PASRP III)

Budget Support III (PASRP III)




OMVS multinational project to protect the ecosystems of the Senegal River Basin

Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities (PAIRF)


Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)



Inputs/Resources

Source: ADF/BD/WP/2010/144, 22 Nov 2010

95Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n



Outcomes The ASTER software perimeter covers all the accounting items


Outputs


Budget support I (PASRP I)





Local small-scale irrigation project (PAPIL)

Budget support II (PASRP II)





PAPIL Supplementary Loan

Budget support III (PASRP III)





OMVS multinational project to protect the ecosystems of the Senegal River Basin






Inputs/Resources


Annex 7A: Results-Based Logical Framework of 2010-2015 CSP (Pillar 1)

Pillars Pillar II: Contribution to Reinforcement of National and Regional InfrastructureSectors Water and Sanitation Rational Natural

Resource ExploitationTransport Energy

Impacts Contribute to the expansion of services and improvement of service delivery quality

Intensify efforts to preserve, safeguard and enhance the Environment and to combat desertification


Outcomes 98% drinking water access rate in urban areas in 2012and 100% in 2015

2300 ha of salty land reclaimed in 2012 and 2985 ha in 2015

Rehabilitation and widening of 75km of roads in 2012 and 252 km in 2015

Gap narrowed by 15%

76% drinking water access rate in rural areas in 2012and 82% in 2015

940 ha of land reforested or treated by SWC/SRC in 2012 and 1190 ha in 2015

64% sanitation access rate in urban areas in 2012 and 78% in 2015

1066 ha of irrigated areas and agricultural wetlands developed in 2012 and 1736 ha in 2015

20% sanitation access rate in rural areas from 2012

10 waterways cleared on the RB and LB to prevent the return of invasive aquatic plants (Typha) in 2012 and 33 in 2015

19 stock watering ponds deepened in 2012 and 19 in 2015

Outputs Construction of 2x368 MW hydro-power dams and 1700km interconnection line

Activities/Operation

Toll motorway Kounoune thermal power plant

Thiès-Linguère Project Sendou coal-fired power-plant project

Tamba-Kedougou Project OMVG I (Kaleta)

Dakar-Bamako Corridor OMVG I (Sambagalou)

Dakar-Conakry Corridor

Gambia bridge

Rosso Bridge Budget Support III

Inputs/Resources

Source: ADF/BD/WP/2010/144, 22 Nov 2010

97Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

Annex 8: Selected Comparative Socioeconomic Indicators for Senegal

Year Senegal Africa Developing Countries

Developed Countries

Basic IndicatorArea ('000km2) 2014 197 30 067 80 386 53 939

Total Population (million) 2014 14,5 1 136,9 6,0 1,3

Urban Population (% of Total) 2014 43,4 39,9 47,6 78,7

Population Density (per km2) 2014 74,0 37,8 73,3 24,3

GNI per Capita (US $) 2013 1 050 2 310 4 168 39 812

Labor Force Participation - Total (%) 2014 76,6 66,1 67,7 72,3

Labor Force Participation - Female (%) 2014 44,9 42,8 52,9 65,1

Gender - Related Development Index Value 2007–2013 0,864 0,801 0,506 0,792

Human Development Index (Rank among 187 countries)

2013 163 ... ... ...

Population living Below $ 1.25 a day (% of population)

2008–2013 34,1 39,6 17,0 ...

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2000 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Senegal Africa

GNI per capita US $



Developed Countries

Demographic IndicatorsPopulation Growth Rate - Total (%) 2014 2,9 2,5 1,3 0,4

Population Growth Rate - Urban (%) 2014 3,6 3,4 2,5 0,7

Population < 15 years (%) 2014 43,4 40,8 28,2 17,0

Population >= 65 years (%) 2014 2,9 3,5 6,3 16,3

Dependency Ratio (%) 2014 82,5 62,4 54,3 50,4

Sex Ratio (per 100 female) 2014 96,4 100,4 107,7 105,4

Female Population 15-49 years (% of total population)

2014 24,4 24,0 26,0 23,0

Life Expectancy at Birth - Total (years) 2014 63,6 59,6 69,2 79,3

Life Expectancy at Birth - Female (years) 2014 65,0 60,7 71,2 82,3

curde Birth Rate (per 1,000) 2014 37,3 34,4 20,9 11,4

curde Birth Rate (per 1,000) 2014 7,5 10,2 7,7 9,2

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2013 43,9 56,7 36,8 5,1

Child Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2013 55,3 84,0 50,2 6,1

Total Fertility Rate (per women) 2014 4,9 4,6 2,6 1,7

Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) 2013 320,0 411,5 230,0 17,0

Women Using Contraception (%) 2014 17,4 34,9 62,0 ...

2,0

2,5

3,0

2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

AfricaSenegal

Population Growth Rate (%)

99Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n


Developed Countries

Health & Nutrition IndicatorsPhysicians (per 100,000 people) 2004–2012 5,9 46,9 118,1 308,0

Nurses (per 100,000 people)* 2004–2012 42,0 133,4 202,9 857,4

Births attended by Trained Health Personnel (%)

2009–2012 65,1 50,6 67,7 ...

Access to Safe Water (% of population) 2012 74,1 67,2 87,2 99,2

Healthy life expectancy at birth (years) 2012 55,0 51,3 57 69

Access to Sanitation (% of Population) 2012 51,9 38,8 56,9 96,2

Percent. of adults (aged 15-49) Living with HIV / AIDS

2013 0,5 3,7 1,2 ...

Incidence of Tuberculosis (per 100,000) 2013 136,0 246,0 149,0 22,0

Child Immunization Against Tuberculosis (%) 2013 97,0 84,3 90,0 ...

Child Immunization Against Measies (%) 2013 84,0 76,0 82,7 93,9

Underweight Children (% of children under 5 years)

2005–2013 16,8 20,9 17,0 0,9

Daily Calorie Supply per Capita 2011 2 426 2 618 2 335 3 503

Public Expenditure on Health (as % of GDP) 2013 2,2 2,7 3,1 7,3

50

60

70

2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

AfricaSenegal

Life Expectancy at Birth (years)



Developed Countries

Education IndicatorsGross Enroiment Ratio (%)

Primary School - Total 2011–2014 83,6 106,3 109,4 101,3

Primary School - Female 2011–2014 87,1 102,6 107,6 101,1

Secondary School - Total 2011–2014 41,0 54,3 69,0 100,2

Secondary School - Female 2011–2014 39,1 51,4 67,7 99,9

Primary School Female Teaching Staff (% of Total)

2012–2014 32,4 45,1 58,1 81,6

Adult literacy Rate - Total (%) 2006–2012 52,1 61,9 80,4 99,2

Adult literacy Rate - Male (%) 2006–2012 66,3 70,2 85,9 99,3

Adult literacy Rate - Female (%) 2006–2012 40,4 53,5 75,2 99,0

Percentage of GDP Spent on Education 2009–2012 5,6 5,3 4,3 5,5

Environmental IndicatorsLand Use (Arable Land as % of Total Land Area)

2012 17,4 8,8 11,8 9,2

Agricultural Land (as % of land Area) 2012 0,5 43,4 43,4 28,9

Forest (As % of Land Area) 2012 43,6 22,1 28,3 34,9

Per Capita CO2 Emissions (metric tons) 2012 0,5 1,1 3,0 11,6Sources: AfDB Statistics Department Databases; World Bank: World Development Indicators;

last update: UNAIDS; UNSD; WHO, UNICEF, UNDP; Country Reports.

Note n.a: Not Applicable;

...: Data Not Available

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Senegal Africa

Infant Mortality Rate (Per 1000)

Photo: Debazou Yantio

The Gambia forms an enclave within the country along the Gambia River. Three cross-border road corridors and structures to the Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali were completed. They have improved connectivity with neighboring countries and helped to increase the volume of trade with these countries between 2009 and 2013.


Endnotes

1. This was the year following the establishment of ORQR (2008) during which project completion reports became more frequent and comprehensive.

2. Detailed description in Annex 1.

3. For the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency criteria, the scale is as follows: 1=highly unsatisfactory; 2=unsatisfactory; 3=moderately unsatisfactory; 4=moderately satisfactory; 5=satisfactory; 6=highly satisfactory. For sustainability it is as follows: 1=highly improbable; 2=improbable; 3=fairly improbable; 4=fairly probable; 5=probable; 6=highly probable.

4. Mouhamadou Bamba DIOP. What sectors for what type of economic growth in Senegal? DPEE

5. Senegal. Emerging Senegal Plan-Transport Infrastructure, Technical Thematic Note

6. Senegal. Poverty Monitoring Survey in Senegal, 2005-2006 and 2011

7. Senegal Emerging Senegal Plan-Transport Infrastructure, Thematic Technical Note

8. PRSP II: Priority action levers

9. The theories of change developed from the results of the evaluation of the various sectors are presented in Annexes 29 to 34.

10. DPS The informal sector in the Dakar conurbation, Phase 2 of the 2003 1-2-3 survey, June 2004)

11. Mott MacDonald. 2015. Patte d’Oie-Diamniadio Toll Motorway, Quarterly Operating Report of the second half of 2014, February 2015

12. Department of Land Transport. 2007. Study on the Operating Costs and Conditions of Public Transport Passenger Vehicles in Senegal for optimal tariffing, September 2007

13. ESTA database, 2014

14. 2014 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) Data Portal, accessible at http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org/downloads/publications/2014/2014-iiag-data-portal.xlsm

15. Doing Business 2016, World Bank Group

16. PAPIL PCR

17. Anti-salt dikes, water retention and control structures, island breakwaters, wetland and irrigation development works and the construction of farm-to-market roads

18. Modeling of climate change in Senegal

19. The online database of the National Local Development Program (PNDL) covers 14 958 villages in Senegal, consulted on 22 September 2015 at http://www.pndl.org/Repertoire-des-villages-du-Senegal.html. The Senegal on-line tourist guide indicates 13 544 villages (http://www.senegal-online.com/tourisme_au_senegal/villes-et-villages-du-senegal/).

20. SENELEC: 2011-2013 SENELEC activity report/ revision of tariff conditions in March 2013

21. Study Report: Senegal faced with the global energy crisis: the emergence challenges of the biofuel sub-sector / Isra-Bame, November 2009

22. AfDB. 2010. Senegal: Country Strategy Paper (CSP) 2010-2015, Annex 1, p. 26

23. COWI Denmark, 2005. Denmark, quoted by the General Economic and Financial Council and the Civil Engineering General Council in its 'Report on the comparison at European Level of road construction, maintenance and operating costs in 2006;

24. Africon. 2008. Unit Costs of Infrastructure Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa, June 2008

25. IFAD. 2014. Republic of Senegal: Country Program Evaluation, Report No. 3317-SN

26. Dissertation by El Hadji Diakhaté, Senior Financial Expert -CRSE

27. Study Report: Senegal faced with the global energy crisis: the emergence challenges of the biofuel sub-sector / Isra-Bame, November 2009

28. Project Performance Evaluation Report (PPER). Dakar Sanitation Project (PAVD). May 2012

29. Health Project II PCR

30. Emerging Senegal Plan – Transport Infrastructure, Technical Thematic Note

103Annexes

An ID

EV C

ount

ry S

trat

egy

Eval

uatio

n

31. Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission (CRSE). 2010. Senegal's Energy Information System, Report by the Ministry of International Cooperation, Air Transport, Infrastructure and Energy

32. CRSE: Audit of Security of Electric Power Supply in Senegal / July 2005

33. ANSD: Analytical Note on External Trade- 2010 and 2013 Editions

34. Observatory of Abnormal Practices (OPA), Presentation of OPA Project and Main Results – March 2013

35. DP World Dakar Statistics 2010-2013; DCT Expanded Supervision Report, 2013

36. Mott MacDonald. 2015. Patte d’Oie-Diamniadio Toll Motorway, Quarterly Operating Report of the second half of 2014, February 2015

37. Ministry of the Interior, Local Government and Decentralization. 2009. Completion Report. National Local Development Program (PNDL), Community Roads Project (PPC)

38. Ministry of the Interior, Local Government and Decentralization. 2010. Capitalization on experience and assessment of socio-economic impacts. National Local Development Program (PNDL), Community Roads Project (PPC)

39. AfDB. 2014. Bank Group Country Strategy papers: Principles, Processes and Annotated Format. Document no. ADB/BD/WP/2014/73

40. AfDB. 2015. Republic of Senegal - Combined 2010-2015 Completion Report and 2015 Country Portfolio Performance Review, Document ADB/BD/WP/2015/XX, Annex 2, Table 2.2

41. Combined 2010-2015CSP Mid-Term Review and 2012 Country Portfolio Performance Review

42. Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2014. Development Cooperation Report (DCR): For cooperation commensurate with Senegal's development ambitions. p. 13, Dakar, Senegal

43. SAP Data, August 2014

44. Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2014. Development Cooperation Report (DCR): For cooperation commensurate with Senegal's development ambitions. p. 13, Dakar, Senegal

45. Approved: Project approved by the Board which is not yet effective for first disbursement; Ongoing: Project being implemented. Are considered as being implemented: (a) projects which are effective and where the Borrower has fulfilled the conditions precedent to first disbursement or (b) physically completed projects (activities planned at appraisal and reviewed during the Mid-Term Review which have been implemented) the loans for which still have undrawn balances and for which a completion report has not been prepared; Cancelled: Project whose implementation is suspended before completion of the planned activities. The following will be considered in this category: (a) Projects approved and cancelled before signature of the loan agreements; (b) Projects for which the loan agreements are signed and then cancelled without disbursements; (c) projects for which loans are partly disbursed then the undrawn balances cancelled before implementation of the activities originally planned in the appraisal report and possibly revised during the Mid-Term Review; Completed: Completed project most of whose activities planned at appraisal have been implemented and have been the subject of a Bank completion report. Physically completed projects whose loans/grants are fully disbursed may be added to this category even if the completion report has not yet been prepared; Closed: Projects fully implemented with finalized PCR.

Despite the delays, about 200 structures and other infrastructure have been completed under the Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Program funded by the Bank in Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack, and Tambacounda. These facilities have helped to recover 3,263 ha of salty land, restore 1,159 hectares of land, reforest 1,083 hectares of land, regenerate 90.75 ha of mangrove swamps, and protect 4 out of 5 island sites.

Independent Development EvaluationAfrican Development Bank

idev.afdb.org

Des

ign

& la

yout

: CR

ÉON

• w

ww

.cre

onde

sign

.net

About this Evaluation

This evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the AfDB Group assistance to Senegal over the period 2004-2013. It also draws relevant lessons to help improve implementation of the Bank's 2016 - 2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal.

Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank approved 32 operations, amounting to about UA 525.9 million, in six priority sectors: transport (38%), public sector or governance reform (20%), agriculture and rural development (15%), electric power (12%), water and sanitation (11%) and social development (4%) in women's and youth employment.

Overall, the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Senegalese government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, however, it lacks selectivity.

Specifically, on effectiveness, this evaluation rates the AfDB program and strategies in Senegal as moderately satisfactory. Sector performances are variable. Most of the physical outputs have been achieved. However, these outputs have not always been translated into development outcomes. Efficiency is moderately unsatisfactory mainly as a result of slippage on implementation and cost overruns or underruns. Sustainability is fairly probable. The communities have assumed ownership of the assets in certain sectors. However, there are still problems regarding mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget, as well as poor operating conditions of the structures and training on the use of equipment.

Based on these findings, this evaluation formulates practical and relevant recommendations to improve future programs and strategies: (a) strengthen the Bank's strategic positioning, (b) ensure the sustainability of infrastructures, and (c) improve the effectiveness of project/program supervision.

An IDEV Country Strategy Evaluation

African Development Bank GroupAvenue Joseph Anoma 01 BP 1387, Abidjan 01 Côte d’IvoirePhone: +225 20 26 20 41 • Fax: +225 20 21 31 00Email: [email protected]

Senegal: An IDEV Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy...

Documents

Transcript of Senegal: An IDEV Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy...