Seminar
description
Transcript of Seminar
![Page 1: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
• NAMETAGS
![Page 2: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Using Student Engagement As A Lens for Course Evaluation
![Page 3: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Participants should be able to:
1. Remember and understand student engagement, NSSE / CLASSE, course evaluation, EBP
2. Design data collection procedures for gauging student engagement.
3. Interpret the data
4. Take appropriate actions
![Page 4: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Outline
Pre-assessment
Course evaluation
Student engagement
Examples
Post assessment
![Page 5: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pre-assessment
Define: student engagement, NSSE, CLASSE , course evaluation, evidence-based practice.
Explain how you would assess student engagement in your course.
Evaluate the course featured in the data on pages 8 – 10 in the handouts.
Suggest changes to your course that would enhance student engagement.
![Page 6: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Course Evaluation
Evaluators’ perspective:
• A judgment about the worth or merit of something
![Page 7: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Course Evaluation at the U of C
1. Identify merit.
2. Identify criteria and standards.
3. Collect data.
4. Make judgment.
5. Take action.
USRI:Syllabus contained sufficient detail?
Course was consistent with syllabus?
Course content was well organized?
Instructor was responsive?
Treated students with respect?
Evaluation methods were fair?
![Page 8: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Course Evaluation
• Instructors’ perspective
![Page 11: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Student Engagement as Merit?
• The extent to which students participate in activities with established correlations to deep and meaningful learning
– Active and collaborative learning
– Student to faculty contact
– Academic challenge
– Enriching educational activities
– Supportive campus environment
![Page 12: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student Engagement Correlates
• GPA
• Persistence
• Academic development
• Knowledge acquisition
• Analytical and problem solving skills
• Self-esteem
• Deep learning
• General education
• Personal development
• Practical competence
![Page 13: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Measuring Student Engagement
• National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
![Page 14: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
U of A 2008
U of C 2008
Canada Average
U of A Rank
U of C Rank
Active and collaborative
42 44 50 45/52 40/52
Student –Faculty
30 31 41 48/52 41/52
Academic Challenge
52 53 56 50/52 45/52
Enriching experience
35 34 40 28/52 26/52
Campus environment
48 n/a n/a n/a n/a
![Page 15: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Problems with NSSE for Course Evaluation?
• Purely descriptive: Now what?
• General: Blame is diffuse
• Interpretability of data: “quite a bit?” “rarely?”
• Imposed
• “Supportive campus environment?”
• “Enriching educational activities?”
![Page 16: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
From NSSE to CLASSE
• Purely descriptive: Explanatory
• General: Local
• “Quite a bit?” “rarely:” 0, 1-2, 3-4, 5 or more
• Imposed: Voluntary
![Page 17: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Course Evaluation With the CLASSE
1. Identify merit: Student engagement
2. Identify criteria: active, collaborative, challenging
3. Set standards: norms, pre-post,
4. Collect data: CLASSE
5. Make judgments: Compare data with standards
6. Revise course:
![Page 18: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Student Engagement and Narrative Pedagogy
![Page 19: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Aggregate student engagement by course. n = 39, 44. Mean rank = 30.23, 52.43, Mann-Whitney U = 399, p < 0.01.
![Page 20: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Engagement Activities subscale. Mean rank = 33.94, 55.61, Mann-Whitney U = 522.5, p < 0.001.
![Page 21: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Other educational practices subscale. Mean rank = 38.55, 54.27, Mann-Whitney U = 711.50, p = 0.05.
![Page 22: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Cognitive skills subscale: Mean rank = 43.91, 53.59. Mann-Whitney U = 939, p > 0.05.
![Page 23: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Class atmosphere subscale. n = 45, 47, Mean rank = 51.94, 41.29, Mann-Whitney U = 812.500, p > 0.05.
![Page 24: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Student Engagement and Study Abroad
![Page 25: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Student Engagement and Study Abroad: Higher Order Learning Items
% of students responding often and very often
Activity On campus Study Abroad
Analyzed concepts 50 68
Synthesized information 50 68
Made judgments 36.6 68
Applied concepts 22.7 55
Effect size 0.72
![Page 26: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Student Engagement and Study Abroad: Reflective Learning Items
% of students responding often and very often
Activity On campus Study Abroad
Examined my views 50 77
Examined others’ views 60 86
Changed understanding 63 86
Applied to personal life 55 82
Comfort with ambiguity 54 64
Effect size 0.85
![Page 27: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Student Engagement and Study Abroad: General Education Items
% of students responding quite a bit and very much
Activity On campus Study Abroad
Acquired a general edu 68 91
Work related K S A 23 90
Critical thinking 50 63
Working with others 37 81
Independent learning 55 60
Effect size 0.72
![Page 28: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Evaluate Your Course For Engagement
• (In pairs) select / revise items from the CLASSE to evaluate your course.
• Set standards.
• Interpret the data.
• Revise the course to enhance engagement.
![Page 29: Seminar](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070318/557884f6d8b42a02618b4a2b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Post assessment
Define: student engagement, NSSE, CLASSE , course evaluation, evidence-based practice.
Explain how you would assess student engagement in your course.
Suggest changes to your course that would enhance student engagement.