Seminar 1 March 20061 Chapter 8 Part II (pp. 274-308) Basic Processing in Ontological Semantic Text...
-
Upload
noel-lucas -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Seminar 1 March 20061 Chapter 8 Part II (pp. 274-308) Basic Processing in Ontological Semantic Text...
Seminar 1 March 2006 1
Chapter 8 Part II (pp. 274-308)
Basic Processing in Ontological Semantic Text Analysis
Sergei Nirenburg
Victor Raskin
Seminar 1 March 2006 2
Part I (Quick Review)
• Tokenization, lexical look-up, syntactic analysis
• Semantic dependencies– Proposition– Semantic restriction
• Ontological Semantics as argument-taking concept
• Measure ontological distance
Seminar 1 March 2006 3
Text Meaning Representation
• A proximate goal of text analysis in ontological semantics
• “The TMRs contain instances of ontological concepts – events and objects” (pp. 301)
• Ontological system opts to retain the knowledge accumulated during its operation
Seminar 1 March 2006 4
Part II (Overview)
• When basic procedures returns no answer
• Processing beyond semantic dependencies
• Processing at the suprapropositional Level
Seminar 1 March 2006 5
When basic procedures returns no answer
• Relaxation of semantic restrictions (solution)
• Processing nonliteral language
• Processing unattested input
• Processing ellipsis
Seminar 1 March 2006 6
Relaxation of semantic restrictions
• The gorilla makes tool
• The gorilla cooked dinner– Not all primates cook– Use the facet RELAXABLE-TO on the AGENT
property of PREPARE-FOOD
Seminar 1 March 2006 7
RELAXABLE-TO
• The pianist played Bach
• An example of a nonliteral use of language• An example of metonymy• Different concepts are evoked
Seminar 1 March 2006 8
Metaphorical Instance
• Mary won an argument with John– No sense of ‘argument’ matches WIN
• MILITATY-ACTIVITY, SPORTS ACTIVITY, GAME ACTIVITY
– If the RELAXABLE-TO facet of the THEME has no value
– System will search for an event whose selectional restrictions are matching
• Mary convinced John in an argument
Seminar 1 March 2006 9
‘Convince’ as Subclass of ‘Win’
• Win Opposition-Event Contradict Assertive-Act Argue Convince
• Not sufficiently dealt with in TMR
Seminar 1 March 2006 10
Processing Unattested Input
• Unattested proper names
• Inc., GmbH, Corp., Cie, NA or Ltd.
• Uttestable material is categorized as a kind of proper name
Seminar 1 March 2006 11
• Fred locked the door with the kheegh– ‘Kheegh’ as a noun (LOCK-EVENT)
Seminar 1 March 2006 12
Processing Ellipsis – no solution
• Nick went to the movies and Paul Φ to the game
• I finished the book– Read, write, bind, copy, etc.
• The book reads well (AGENT of ‘read’ is HUMAN)
• John shaved Φ (transitive intransitive)
Seminar 1 March 2006 13
THEME
• Mary enjoyed the movie (Theme: SEE)
• Mary enjoyed the book (Theme: READ)
• Mary enjoyed the cake (Theme: INGEST)
• ?Mary enjoyed the lizard – An ellipsis– INGEST? SEE?
Seminar 1 March 2006 14
Beyond Semantic Dependencies
• Aspect
• Time
• Modality
Seminar 1 March 2006 15
Aspect
• Two properties: PHASE and ITERATION
• PHASE– BEGIN, CONTINUE, END
– BEGIN/CONTINUE/END (momentary)
• ITERATION– Repetitiveness– Value: MULTIPLE
Seminar 1 March 2006 16
Assigning Properties
Seminar 1 March 2006 17
The Aspectual Value
• begin, cease, commence, stop, finish, desist from, carry on, keep, continue
Seminar 1 March 2006 18
Phrasal Verb
• Drink up
• Up is part of
a derivational form
• Like -ed
Seminar 1 March 2006 19
Adverbials Denoting Aspect
• He sat on the bench on Wednesday– PHASE: CONTINUE, ITERATION – 1
• He sat on the bench every Wednesday– PHASE: CONTINUE, ITERATION – MULTIPLE
Seminar 1 March 2006 20
Ontological Concept for ‘Wednesday’
Seminar 1 March 2006 21
• Only the uses of every, each, etc. that refer to temporal units will be processed with the aspetual properties
• Not every table, each table, etc.
Seminar 1 March 2006 22
Ontological Concept for ‘Often’
• Standard abstract scalar range for most 0.6-0.9
Seminar 1 March 2006 23
Proposition Time
• June 11, 2000 (absolute time)
• Wednesday GET-PROPOSITION-TIME
• Speech act time – after (>), before (<) at (=)
Seminar 1 March 2006 24
Seminar 1 March 2006 25
Modality
• Express attitudes• plan, try, hope, expect, want, intend, doubt, be sure, like
(to), mean, need, choose, propose, want, wish, dread, hate, loathe, love, prefer, deign, disdain, scorn, venture, afford, attempt, contrive, endeavor, fail, manage, neglect, undertake, vow, envisage
Seminar 1 March 2006 26
Epistemic
• Expresses the attitude of the speaker toward the factivity of the proposition
• “The speaker does not believe that X” (value 0)
• “The speaker believes that possibly X” (value 0.6)
• “The speaker believes that X” (value 1).
Seminar 1 March 2006 27
• Nomura Shoken announced that it has tied up with Credit 109.
Seminar 1 March 2006 28
Two Epistemic Modalities
• The amount of investment in the joint venture is estimated at 34 million dollars.
• Default= 1 (no clues whether correct)
Seminar 1 March 2006 29
Two Epistemic Modalities
• The amount of investment in the joint venture is estimated at 34 million dollars.
• 0.8-0.9 (because it is estimated)• Guess (0.3-0.7)
Seminar 1 March 2006 30
Epiteuctic• Refers to the degree of success in attaining the results of the event
• Complete failure: – They never bothered to register to vote (value 0)
• Partial success:– They failed to recognize the tell-tale signs of an economic downturn (val
ue 0.2-0.8)
• Near success:– He almost broke the world record in pole vaulting (value 0.9)
• Complete success:– They reached the North Pole (value 1.0).
Seminar 1 March 2006 31
Deontic• Deals with the semantics of obligation and permission.
• No obligation– British Petroleum may purchase crude oil from any supplier (value 0.0)
• Some hint of a non-binding obligation– There is no stipulation in the contract that Disney must pay access fees
to cable providers. (value 0.2)
• Possibility of an obligation– Kawasaki Steel may have to sell its South American subsidiary. (value 0.
8)
• An absolute obligation – Microsoft must appeal the decision within 15 days. (value 1.0)
Seminar 1 March 2006 32
Other Modalities
• Volitive– Expresses the degree of desirability of an eve
nt – want, hope, plan, wish, desire, strive, look for
ward to, be interested in, etc.
• Potential– Deals with meanings that describe the ability
of the agent to perform an action.– capable of, be able to, etc.
Seminar 1 March 2006 33
Other Modalities
• Evaluative – expresses attitudes to events, objects and pro
perties. One can also evaluate another modality.
– like,admire, appreciate, praise, criticize, dislike, hate, denigrate, etc.
• Saliency– Expresses the importance that the speaker att
aches to a component of text meaning.• It is unimportant that she is often late for work
Seminar 1 March 2006 34
Suprapropositional Level
• Reference
• Discourse (no particular solution)
• Style (no particular solution)
Seminar 1 March 2006 35
Reference and Coreference
• Retaining of accumulated knowledge• Unattested knowledge first stored in FR• Retrieve in latter mentions
• In June 1985, John was already thinking of leaving the Army, and Mary did not know it then.
• Every Wednesday Eric sat in the park, and so did Terry.
• Brian wanted to become a pilot, and so did his brother.
Seminar 1 March 2006 36
Authors’ Contributions(a personal note)
• Knowledge retaining system (coreference)
• Modality
• Argument-structure (?)
Seminar 1 March 2006 37
Questions?