Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

15
國國國國國國國國 National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches Author :Richard Jensen and Qiang Shen Reporter : Tse Ho Lin 2008/5/20 1 TKDE, 2004

description

Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches. Author :Richard Jensen and Qiang Shen Reporter : Tse Ho Lin 2008/5/20. TKDE, 2004. Outline. Motivation Objectives Feature Selection Approaches Review Rough Fuzzy Rough Conclusion Personal Comments. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

Page 1: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

國立雲林科技大學National Yunlin University of Science and Technology

Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

Author :Richard Jensen and Qiang Shen

Reporter : Tse Ho Lin

2008/5/20

1

TKDE, 2004

Page 2: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Outline

Motivation Objectives Feature Selection Approaches Review

Rough Fuzzy Rough

Conclusion Personal Comments

2

Page 3: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Motivation

Conventional rough set theory are unable to deal with real-valued attributes effectively.

What’s current trends and future directions for rough-set-based methodologies.

3

Page 4: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Objectives

This review focuses on those recent techniques for feature selection that employ a rough-set-based methodology for this purpose.

4

Page 5: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Feature Selection Review

Rough Rough Set Attribute Reduction Discernibility Matrix Approach Dynamic Reducts Experimental Results

Fuzzy Rough Fuzzy Rough Attribute Reduction Rough Set-Based Feature Grouping

5

Page 6: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Feature Selection Review

Rough Rough Set Attribute Reduction Discernibility Matrix Approach Dynamic Reducts Experimental Results

Fuzzy Rough Fuzzy Rough Attribute Reduction Rough Set-Based Feature Grouping

6

Page 7: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Rough Set Attribute Reduction

e=12,5e=0

e=2

0,4

31,6,7

QUICKREDUCT:

Variable precision rough sets

7

Page 8: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Discernibility Matrix Approach

Removing those sets that are supersets of others

8

Page 9: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Dynamic Reducts

9

Page 10: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Experimental Results

RSAR < EBR<=SimRSAR<= AntRSAR<= GenRSARTime cost:

AntRSAR and SimRSAR outperform the other three methods.Performance:

10

Page 11: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Feature Selection Review

Rough Rough Set Attribute Reduction Discernibility Matrix Approach Dynamic Reducts Experimental Results

Fuzzy Rough Fuzzy Rough Attribute Reduction Rough Set-Based Feature Grouping

11

Page 12: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Fuzzy Rough Attribute Reduction

12

Page 13: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Rough Set-Based Feature Grouping

Selection Strategies:

•Individuals

•Grouping

13

Page 14: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Conclusion

This prompted research into the use of fuzzy-rough sets for feature selection. Additionally, the new direction in feature selection, feature grouping, was highlighted.

14

Page 15: Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction rough and fuzzy rough based approaches

N.Y.U.S.T.

I. M.

Personal Comments

Application Feature selection.

Advantage Fuzzy.

Drawback Fuzzy!

15