Self Help Legal Software and Unauthorized Practice of Law
-
Upload
richard-granat -
Category
Self Improvement
-
view
1.698 -
download
0
Transcript of Self Help Legal Software and Unauthorized Practice of Law
Self-Help Systemsand
Unauthorized Practice
Richard GranatMarc Lauritsen
TIG ConferenceJanuary 2013
Jacksonville, Florida
What and why
• Online services that gather information, give information, and generate documents
• Used by self-helpers, clients, advocates, and court personnel
• Benefits– Dissemination of knowledge and
assistance– Efficient production of routine work– Better document results, more informed
litigants
Today’s focus
• Ethical and regulatory considerations bearing on delivery of online document assembly services outside of intended lawyer-client relationships
• How to manage the risks and benefits
Document preparation services
Online forms
Online automated forms
Online services with lawyers in the loop
Traditionalservice
Co-production
Self help
Potential problems
• Provider is charged with unauthorized practice
• Lawyer participants are charged with unethically assisting unauthorized practice
OR
• An unintended lawyer/client relationship arises, with duties that aren’t or can’t be met
AND/OR
• An aggrieved user sues (malpractice, general negligence, consumer protection, …)
Preliminary points
• Key question: what is the practice of law?
• This is an evolving area, with lots of murky aspects. Few bright lines.
• Great variation by jurisdiction• Competing values and policy
perspectives (e.g. consumer protection cuts several ways)
Legal information vs. advice
• Usually improper to give advice outside an attorney/client relationship
• Where does interactive software fit? Can a machine give ‘advice’?
Information General advice Assistance Specific
adviceRepresentat
ion
Issues if the service is found to be (legitimate) law practice
• Confidentiality• Conflicts of Interest• Duty to inquire• Candor toward the tribunal• Clarity on scope of representation• Duties to prospective clients• Communication with opposing
counsel and unrepresented parties
Unauthorized practice
• Dacey, Parsons, Reynoso• Texas UPL statute exception• Form selection and document
preparation• Does it make any difference if you
are a nonprofit? If the service is free?
• 1st amendment – speech vs. action• FTC, Dept of Justice
http://www.scbar.org/public_services/unauthorized_practice_of_law/
Example: “What is considered the "practice of law"?The practice of law is more than just appearing in court on behalf of a client. Though no concise definition of practice of law exists, certain characteristics make it more likely that the Court will view certain conduct as the practice of law. An early South Carolina case, cited by other jurisdictions as well, stated that the practice of law includes "the preparation of legal instruments of all kinds, and in general all advice to clients and all action taken for them in matters connected with the law." In re Duncan, 65 S.E. 210 (S.C. 1909). The practice of law "extends to activities in other fields which entail specialized legal knowledge." South Carolina v. Buyers Serv. Co., 357 S.E.2d 15 (S.C. 1987).
Additionally, whether an individual is paid for his or her services is irrelevant. The reasons for prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law are not to protect licensed attorneys from losing business to unlicensed individuals. Rather, the purpose is to protect the public from consequences resulting "from the erroneous preparation of legal documents or the inaccurate legal advice given by persons untrained in the law." South Carolina v. McLauren, 563 S.E.2d 346 (S.C. 2002).”
It is the opinion of the Pennsylvania Bar Association Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee that the offering or providing [in Pennsylvania] of legal document preparation services as described herein (beyond the supply of preprinted forms selected by the consumer not the legal document preparation service), either online or at a site in Pennsylvania is the unauthorized practice of law and thus prohibited, unless such services are provided by a person who is duly licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania retained directly for the subject of the legal services.Pennsylvania Bar Association Unauthorized Practice of Law
Committee, Formal Opinion 2010-01, March 2010
Texas exception
‘In this chapter, the "practice of law" does not include the design, creation, publication, distribution, display, or sale, including publication, distribution, display, or sale by means of an Internet web site, of written materials, books, forms, computer software, or similar products if the products clearly and conspicuously state that the products are not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.’
Should software be treated like books?
• Software is essentially just a text being followed by a machine
• Incapable of “judgment”
• Gives same results to all comers
• Mutual anonymity
But …• Can be
contextualized to specific circumstances
• Can feel like you interacting with a person (avatars, audio, video)
• Might be described as an ‘expert system’
Author, advisers, publisher, book store
personnel, …
Law is not being practiced
here
Sponsoring programs, substantive experts, technical developers, funders, service
providers
Is law being practiced
here?
Bidirectionalcommunication
Advice
<= Information Content Guidance =>
<=
On
e-w
ay H
um
an
com
mu
nic
ati
on
Tw
o-w
ay
=>
“Live”
Facts Opinions
Conversation
Expertise
Publication
Self help systems ?
Unauthorized practice
Law practice (counsel, representation)
“Pre-recorded”
Books, pamphlets
Books, pamphlets
Legit doc prep services
Interpersonal
Impersonal
Important safeguards
• Ensure quality control – testing, updating
• Follow ABA best practices• Include qualifying questions and
disclaimers• Provide well-crafted terms of service
and privacy policies• Collaborate with the courts• Talk with bar regulators, UPL
authorities• Talk with malpractice insurer
How to make clear to people that they are not in a lawyer-client
relationship
• It comes down to “reasonable belief”
• Disclaimers– Up front– In interviews – In documents/instructions
• Get an affirmative acknowledgment
Risks we should be most concerned about
• People being hurt by– misunderstandings about the service;– inaccurate or incomplete information.
• People not being helped – out of exaggerated fears of
impropriety or liability;– by giving in to unreasonable
restraints on service delivery.
If your regulatory environment seems an unreasonable obstacle
• Encourage re-interpretation
• Seek changes in the rules
• Challenge on constitutional or federal preemption grounds
• Consider limited services models
Resources• ED105 - Technology Ethics and Pitfalls in
Online Legal Services (2005) - http://lsntap.org/ed105
• http://www.abanet.org/cpr/model-def/model_def_statutes.pdf
• ABA standards for provision of civil legal aid – http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/sclaid/
• ABA best practices for legal information websites - http://www.elawyering.org/tools/practices.shtml
• http://www.selfhelpsupport.org/library/folder.100606-Court_Rules_Standards
• Scriveners In Cyberspace: Online Document Preparation and the Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Catherine J. Lanctot (2002)
Recap
• Online document assembly services can be delivered in legal and ethical ways
• The risks are manageable• Make it your business to know local
laws and rules• Talk with relevant authorities• Try to improve the regulatory
environment if it seems unreasonable
Questions and Comments