Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

21
lyondellbasell.com Matt Sonnycalb Application Development/Technical Service Engineer LyondellBasell AMI Polyethylene Films 2015 Daytona Beach, FL February 3, 2015 Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

Transcript of Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

Page 1: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Matt Sonnycalb Application Development/Technical Service Engineer LyondellBasell AMI Polyethylene Films 2015 Daytona Beach, FL February 3, 2015

Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

Page 2: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Objectives

• Present down-gauging as an optimization problem

• Compare the dependence of key physical properties on gauge for some high performance LLDPE film grades

• Demonstrate an easy way to choose the ‘best’ product and gauge

• Illustrate a multilayer alternative to overall film down-gauging

2

Page 3: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Framing the problem

• 3 questions of optimization:

1. What is our objective?

• Minimize film cost, material usage, etc.

2. What are we trying to decide?

• LLDPE to use and at what thickness

3. How are we constrained?

• Physical properties that have to be met

• Having the right data is critical

3

Page 4: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Typical physical property comparisons

4

Datasheets seldom provide the ‘right’ data. Products have to be evaluated across a gauge range.

• Property comparisons between products often difficult

– Different film production conditions

– Single gauge, often different than desired

– Different relationships of properties to gauge

Page 5: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Generating the relevant data

• Produced films ranging in nominal thickness from 0.5 to 2.5 mil

• All films produced on a monolayer lab line under the following extrusion conditions

– 4 inch die with 100 mil die gap

– 55 lbs/hr

– 2.3:1 blowup ratio

– 12 inch frost line height (3 DD)

– Typical LLDPE temperature profile (~425 F melt temperature)

• All films tested for actual gauge and typical physical properties such as Dart Drop & Elmendorf Tear

5

Resin Type Melt Index (g/10 min)

Density (g/cc)

Superhexene 0.6 0.9165

Hexene mLLDPE 1.0 0.918

Standard Octene 1.0 0.920

Standard Hexene 1.0 0.918

Page 6: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

26” Dart Drop results ASTM D1709-Method A

6

The hexene mLLDPE studied has higher dart drop impact strength than the other products, especially at thin gauges.

The superhexene product provides higher dart drop versus the std. octene and std. hexene grades studied.

The dart drop of the mLLDPE and superhexene grades increases faster with gauge than the std. hexene and std. octene grades.

Observations

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Dar

t D

rop

Imp

act

Stre

ngt

h, F

50

(g)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE Std. Octene Std Hexene

Page 7: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

1% Secant Modulus (Machine Direction) results ASTM D882

7

Modulus mostly unchanged with increasing gauge.

The std. hexene grade has the highest modulus of the products studied, followed by std. octene.

Other products studied have comparable modulus values.

Observations

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

1%

Se

can

t M

od

ulu

s, M

D (

psi

)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE Std. Octene Std. Hexene

Page 8: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Film ‘stiffness’ (modulus x thickness) results

8

‘Stiffness’ is modulus multiplied by gauge. Represents the film resistance to strain/extension, but depends on both modulus and gauge.

At similar gauges, the relative stiffness values are consistent with the modulus results (std. hexene > std. octene > superhexene = mLLPDE.

The products tend to cluster together at thinner gauges.

Observations

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Film

Sti

ffn

ess

, MD

(lb

/in

)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE Std. Octene Std. Hexene

Page 9: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Elmendorf Tear (Machine Direction) results ASTM D1922

9

Below 2 mils, the superhexene grade has the highest machine direction tear strength of the products studied.

Below 1 mil, the superhexene product retains tear advantage while other products cluster together.

Above 2 mils, the superhexene and std. octene grades both provide higher tear strength versus the std. hexene and mLLDPE grades.

Observations

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Elm

en

do

rf T

ear

, MD

(g)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE Std Octene Std Hexene

Page 10: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Summary of observations

• Superhexene LLDPE offers an excellent balance of dart drop and tear resistance in the gauge range studied

• The superhexene grade offers higher dart drop than the std. octene and std. hexene grades studied

• The superhexene grade offers increased tear resistance versus the other products studied, especially at thinner gauges

• The superhexene product provides comparable modulus values to most of the products studied

10

Page 11: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Using the data to make choices

• Could use a spreadsheet optimization model to choose ‘best’ combination of product and gauge

–Mixed integer linear (or nonlinear) programming model

–Better suited to larger scale problems

• Easier graphical method for simple down-gauging choices

– For each property

• Plot the property data vs. gauge for each product

• Draw a line at the minimum acceptable value

• Find the minimum gauge for each product that meets the minimum acceptable value

– The largest minimum gauge for each product is the overall minimum

11

Page 12: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

0 1 2 31

% S

eca

nt

Mo

du

lus,

MD

(p

si)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE

Std. Octene Std. Hexene

Example of graphical method (modulus)

• Theoretical application that requires the following minimum physical properties

– 25,000 psi 1% secant modulus (MD)

– 300 grams dart drop

– 300 grams Elmendorf tear (MD)

• Consider stiffness at starting gauge in addition to modulus

– 2 mil film @ 25 kpsi = 50 lb./in

– 1 mil film @ 25 kpsi = 25 lb./in

12

All products / gauges exceed the modulus

requirement

Page 13: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 1 2 3

Dar

t D

rop

Imp

act

Stre

ngt

h, F

50

(g)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE

Std. Octene Std Hexene

Example of graphical method (dart drop)

• Minimum required gauges to meet the dart drop requirement (300 grams)

–mLLDPE = any

– Superhexene = 0.9 mils

– Std. Octene = 2 mils

– Std. Hexene = 2.15 mils

13

Page 14: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 1 2 3

Elm

en

do

rf T

ear

, MD

(g)

Film Gauge (mils)

Superhexene mLLDPE

Std Octene Std Hexene

Example of graphical method (Elmendorf Tear)

• Minimum required gauges to meet the Elmendorf tear requirement (300 grams)

–mLLDPE = 1.1 mil

– Superhexene = 0.6 mil

– Std. Octene = 0.9 mils

– Std. Hexene = 0.9 mils

14

Page 15: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Graphical method example results

15

Film gauge to meet minimum requirement

Product Modulus

(MD) Dart Drop

Elmendorf Tear (MD)

Overall Minimum

Superhexene any 0.9 0.6 0.9

mLLDPE any any 1.1 1.1

Std. Octene any 2.0 0.9 2.0

Std. Hexene any 2.2 0.9 2.2

• For this hypothetical combination of properties, superhexene provides the most down-gauging potential

• mLLDPE is limited by its tear strength

• Std. octene and std. hexene limited by dart drop

• Have to consider all property requirements when down-gauging

Observations

Page 16: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Multilayer structure alternatives to ‘down-gauging’

• Can ‘down-gauge’ individual layers in multilayer films

• Could decrease overall film cost but maintain same overall thickness and properties

• Looked at a high performance stretch-hooder structure

– 3 layer film

–mLLDPE skins, Adflex core

– 4 mil gauge

– 20/60/20 layer distribution

• Studied two variables

– Substituted superhexene for mLLDPE

– Increased skin layer percentages

• Evaluated standard physical properties

16

Page 17: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

1% Secant Modulus (MD) and haze results ASTM D882 and D1003

Superhexene skin layers reduce modulus vs. mLLDPE. MD modulus increases with

increasing skin %.

Superhexene skin layers reduce haze vs. mLLDPE. Haze increases slightly with

increasing skin %.

17

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

20/60/20 25/50/25 30/40/30

Haz

e (

%)

Layer Ratio

mLLDPE Skins Superhexene Skins

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

20/60/20 25/50/25 30/40/30

1%

Se

can

t M

od

ulu

s M

D (

psi

)

Layer Ratio

mLLDPE Skins Superhexene Skins

Page 18: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Elmendorf tear (MD) and 60” Dart Drop results ASTM D1922 and D1709-Method B

Superhexene improves MD tear vs. mLLDPE. Increased skin layer % provides

similar tear to control (20/60/20).

Increased skin layer % provides similar or improved impact to control. mLLDPE

improves impact vs. superhexene.

18

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

20/60/20 25/50/25 30/40/30

Elm

en

do

rf T

ear

, MD

(gr

ams)

Layer Ratio

mLLDPE Skins Superhexene Skins

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

20/60/20 25/50/25 30/40/30

Dar

t D

rop

Imp

act

Stre

ngt

h, 6

0"

(gra

ms)

Layer Ratio

mLLDPE Skins Superhexene Skins

Page 19: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Multilayer results summary

• Obtained physical properties similar to control with increased LL skin layer percentages

• Versus control film:

– Increased mLLDPE percentages provide higher impact resistance

– Increased superhexene percentages provide higher tear resistance

• Versus mLLDPE skin layers:

– Superhexene skin layers provided lower haze and modulus

– Superhexene skin layers provided higher tear and lower/similar impact

19

Page 20: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Summary and conclusions

• Viewing down-gauging as an optimization problem can provide a clear framework to make product and gauge choices

–Graphing important properties and requirements makes decisions easier

• Superhexene LLDPE offers excellent down-gauging potential when tear and impact are both important

– Improved dart drop versus std. hexene and octene grades studied

– Improved tear versus mLLDPE grade studied

• Superhexene LLDPE provides comparable performance to mLLDPE in typical 3 layer stretch-hooder films

– Could allow for reduced core layer percentages

20

Page 21: Selecting LLDPE for Down-gauged Films

lyondellbasell.com

Disclaimers

Before using a product sold by a company of the LyondellBasell family of companies, users should make their own independent determination that the product is suitable for the intended use and can be used safely and legally. SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTY; EXPRESS OR IMPLIED (INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR ANY WARRANTY) OTHER THAN AS SEPARATELY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES IN A CONTRACT. LyondellBasell prohibits or restricts the use of its products in certain applications. For further information on restrictions or prohibitions of use, please contact a LyondellBasell representative. Users should review the applicable Safety Data Sheet before handling the product. © LyondellBasell Industries Holdings, B.V. 2015

21