Seismic Upscaling2

52
Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale Greg A. Partyka, Jack B. Thomas, and Kevin P. Turco, bp Dan J. Hartmann, DJH Energy Consulting

description

BP notes

Transcript of Seismic Upscaling2

Page 1: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale

Greg A. Partyka, Jack B. Thomas, and Kevin P. Turco, bp

Dan J. Hartmann, DJH Energy Consulting

Page 2: Seismic Upscaling2

Seismic Reservoir Imaging

8hz Spectral Amplitude Map

WELL #1

Zone 1Zone 1

1 mile

Page 3: Seismic Upscaling2

Seismic Reservoir Imaging

• Sensitivity Issues:– Do acoustic properties respond to variability in petrophysical

properties?• Scale Issues:

– How much seismic resolution is required?

StratigraphyStratigraphy

StructureStructure

SEISMICSEISMICPetrophysicsPetrophysics ?

Page 4: Seismic Upscaling2

Uncertainty and Errors

are embedded at all measurement scales.

SEISMIC SCALE

WELL-LOG SCALE

CORE SCALE

Measurement Scale Uncertainty/Error Examples

microns-to-centimetres

centimetres-to-metres

metres-to-decimetres

sampling bias; damaged plugs

washouts; tool problems

acquisition & processing artifacts

Page 5: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling

• Three Steps:

1. Scoping at the well-log scale.

2. Determining upscaling sensitivity.

3. Predicting petrophysical properties from seismic impedance.

Page 6: Seismic Upscaling2

Scoping at the Well-Log Scale

• Cross-plot well-log-scale acoustic properties versus petrophysical properties.

Are acoustic measurements sensitiveAre acoustic measurements sensitiveto petrophysical propertiesto petrophysical properties

at the well-log scale?at the well-log scale?

Hope for seismic Hope for seismic detection/resolutiondetection/resolution

Game Continues to Next StepGame Over

Seismic will provide Seismic will provide little valuelittle value

NO YES

Page 7: Seismic Upscaling2

Seismic Reservoir Imaging

8hz Spectral Amplitude Map

WELL #1

Zone 1Zone 1

1 mile

Page 8: Seismic Upscaling2

Scoping at the Well-Log Scale

Vp=7445 ft/sVs=3115 ft/sDen=2.23 gm/cc

Vp=6755 ft/sVs=3485 ft/sDen=2.17 gm/cc

Vp=7945 ft/sVs=3260 ft/sDen=2.26 gm/cc

overlying shaleoverlying shale

underlying shaleunderlying shale

reservoirreservoirZone 1Zone 1

Backus AveragedAcoustic Properties

Page 9: Seismic Upscaling2

Scoping at the Well-Log Scale

• Zone 1 Thickness = 57 feet• Backus Filter = None

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 21:15

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

ed

an

ce

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

Page 10: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling

• Three Steps:

1. Scoping at the well-log scale.

2. Determining upscaling sensitivity.

3. Predicting petrophysical properties from seismic impedance.

Page 11: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling Sensitivity

VELOCITYVELOCITY

THICKNESSTHICKNESS

BANDWIDTHBANDWIDTH

RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION FLOW-UNITFLOW-UNITSTACKINGSTACKING

Page 12: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling Sensitivity Analysis

• As we scale-up the acoustic data (e.g. bandlimit or decrease thickness):– acoustic resolution of petrophysical properties degrades.

Page 13: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 21:15

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 057 ftBackus Filter = None

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 14: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:13

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 100 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 15: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:12

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 090 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 16: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:12

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 080 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 17: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:12

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 070 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 18: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:11

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 060 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 19: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:11

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

dan

ce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

666

70.

3333

33

0.5

0.66

666

70.

8333

33

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 20: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:11

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

dan

ce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

666

70.

3333

33

0.5

0.66

666

70.

8333

33

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 040 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 21: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:10

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 030 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 22: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:10

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 020 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 23: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:10

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 010 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 24: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12760.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 16:42

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

danc

e

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 010 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 25: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12770.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 16:49

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 020 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 26: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12780.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 16:57

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

dan

ce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

666

70.

3333

33

0.5

0.66

666

70.

8333

33

Zone 1 Thickness = 030 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 27: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12790.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:05

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

dan

ce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

666

70.

3333

33

0.5

0.66

666

70.

8333

33

Zone 1 Thickness = 040 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 28: Seismic Upscaling2

Zone 1 Thickness = 050 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12800.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:11

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

danc

e

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 29: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12810.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:19

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

danc

e

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 060 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 30: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12820.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:25

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 070 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 31: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12830.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 20:28

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 080 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 32: Seismic Upscaling2

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12840.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 20:36

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ust

ic I

mpe

danc

e

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Zone 1 Thickness = 090 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 33: Seismic Upscaling2

Zone 1 Thickness = 100 ftBackus Filter = 050 Hz

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12850.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 20:43

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Im

peda

nce

1200

024

000

1300

014

000

1500

016

000

1700

018

000

1900

020

000

2100

022

000

2300

0

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n

01

0.16

6667

0.33

3333

0.5

0.66

6667

0.83

3333

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

edan

ce

Wat

er S

atu

rati

on

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

16,000

15,000

14,000

13,000

12,000

1.00

0.83

0.67

0.50

0.33

0.17

0.00

20406080

100 20 40 60 80100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

Bac

ku

s F

ilte

r (H

z)

Page 34: Seismic Upscaling2

Upscaling

• Three Steps:

1. Scoping at the well-log scale.

2. Determining upscaling sensitivity.

3. Predicting petrophysical properties from seismic impedance.

x

y

depth

x

y

depth

SEISMICIMPEDANCE

PETROPHYSICALPROPERTY

RESERVOIRASSESSMENT

Page 35: Seismic Upscaling2

To Predict Petrophysical Properties from Seismic

• Requires:– seismic wavelet,– seismic-derived impedance,– upscaling sensitivity relationships, and– gross thickness.

Page 36: Seismic Upscaling2

Thickness Estimation

• Spectral Decomposition– to compute a Tuning Cube for the zone-of-interest.

• Thickness Modeling– to derive amplitude vs thickness vs frequency relationships.

• Thickness Calibration– to determine gross reservoir thickness.

Page 37: Seismic Upscaling2

Spectral Decomposition

xy

z

xy

z

xy

z

xy

freq

xy

freq

Interpret

3-D Seismic Volume

Subset

Compute

Animate

Interpreted3-D Seismic Volume

Zone-of-InterestSubvolume

Zone-of-InterestTuning Cube

(cross-section view)

Frequency Slicesthrough Tuning Cube

(plan view)

Page 38: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 08hz spectral amplitude

Page 39: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 10hz spectral amplitude

Page 40: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 12hz spectral amplitude

Page 41: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 14hz spectral amplitude

Page 42: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 16hz spectral amplitude

Page 43: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 18hz spectral amplitude

Page 44: Seismic Upscaling2

1

0Well # 1Well # 1

1 mile

Zone 1 20hz spectral amplitude

Page 45: Seismic Upscaling2

Thickness Estimation

• Spectral Decomposition– to compute a Tuning Cube for the zone-of-interest.

• Thickness Modeling– to derive amplitude vs thickness vs frequency relationships.

• Thickness Calibration– to determine gross reservoir thickness.

Page 46: Seismic Upscaling2

Thickness Modeling

Gross Pay Thickness (ft)0 4020 8060 100

Fre

qu

enc

y (h

z)0

40

60

2010

30

50

70

amplitude1

0

Spectral SignaturesSpectral Signatures

Well-Log Interpretation(Zone 1)

shaleshale

Seismic Modeling(Zone 1)

Tw

o-W

ay T

rave

ltim

e (m

s)

0

200

100

150

50 amplitude1

-1

0

dep

th (

feet

)

01

sandsand oiloil

Temporal Wedge ModelTemporal Wedge Model

6hz6hz

8hz8hz

Page 47: Seismic Upscaling2

Thickness Estimation

• Spectral Decomposition– to compute a Tuning Cube for the zone-of-interest.

• Thickness Modeling– to derive amplitude vs thickness vs frequency relationships.

• Thickness Calibration– to determine gross reservoir thickness.

Page 48: Seismic Upscaling2

Thickness Calibration

6hz amplitude

8hz amplitude

Am

pli

tud

e

08hz Spectral Amplitude

Zone 1Zone 1

Gross Reservoir Thicknessfrom 6hz and 8hz energy

WELL #1

06hz Spectral Amplitude

Zone 1Zone 1

Modeled Spectral Signatures vs Thickness

Zone 1Zone 1

Fre

qu

ency

(h

z)

Modeled 6hz Spectral Amplitude vs ThicknessAriel - Zone A1

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

En

erg

y 8hz

6hz

0.008

0.007

0.006

0.005

0.004

0.003

WELL #1

0

100

50

WELL #1

1

0

1 mile

1 mile

1 mile

0

40

2010

30

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Gross Reservoir Thickness (ft)

6hz6hz

8hz8hz

Page 49: Seismic Upscaling2

To Predict Petrophysical Properties from Seismic

• Requires:– seismic wavelet,– seismic-derived impedance,– upscaling sensitivity relationships, and– gross thickness.

Page 50: Seismic Upscaling2

Gross Thickness

Well #1

0

100

50

Thi

ckne

ss (

ft)Zone 1Zone 1

PPetrophysicaletrophysicalPropertyProperty

atatthethe S Seismiceismic S Scalecale

For Example:

If: frequencyupper = 50 hz Then: effective porosity = 0.2

thickness = 80 ftimpedance = 15,000

Impedance

1 mile

Zone 1Zone 1

Note: Scale-induced uncertainty manifests itself along the axis that represents the smallest scale of measurement.

Up

scaling

Cro

ss-Plo

ts

Zone 1 Thickness = Zone 1 Thickness = 40 ft40 ft;;Backus Filter = Backus Filter = 50 Hz50 Hz

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12790.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 17:05

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Impe

danc

e12

000

2400

013

000

1400

015

000

1600

017

000

1800

019

000

2000

021

000

2200

023

000

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n0

10.

1666

670.

3333

330.

50.

6666

670.

8333

33

Effective Porosity

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

ed

an

ce

Zone 1 Zone 1 Thickness = Thickness = 80 ft80 ft;;Backus Filter = Backus Filter = 50 Hz50 Hz

Effective Porosity vs Acoustic Impedance

WELL: OCSG-7944ZONE: 12600.000 - 12830.000 FTDATE: 17 Nov 1998 @ 20:28

Effective Porosity

0 0.40.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Aco

ustic

Impe

danc

e12

000

2400

013

000

1400

015

000

1600

017

000

1800

019

000

2000

021

000

2200

023

000

Wat

er S

atur

atio

n0

10.

1666

670.

3333

330.

50.

6666

670.

8333

33

Aco

ust

ic I

mp

ed

an

ce

Effective Porosity

1 mile

Page 51: Seismic Upscaling2

Summary

• By example we have shown that with proper upscaling, it is possible to merge:– seismic data,– well-log data,– petrophysical data, and– geologic data,

into a better calibrated model.

Page 52: Seismic Upscaling2

Summary

• This interdisciplinary approach can be adjusted for specific fields by calibrating the flow-units.

• Uncertainty and errors are embedded at all measurement scales.• Quality of upscaling is dependent on the degree to which

petrophysical cross-plots are representative of reservoir flow-units.