Seismic Refraction Method.docx
-
Upload
ruqayyahal-furqan -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
0
Transcript of Seismic Refraction Method.docx
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 1/11
Seismic Refraction Method
Applications:
depth of weathering zone (used
for statics correction to seismic
reflection data), i.e., depth to bedrock
depth of groundwater table
depth of basement
depth of Moho
depth of any faster unit
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 2/11
For our purposes, assume flat (not necessarily
horizontal), homogeneous layers. In order to get
a head wave, V2>V1!
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 3/11
The critical angle is the incident angle where the
head wave begins:
Snell's law for multiple parallel layers
Refracted angle into one layer becomes incident
angle into next layer:
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 4/11
Travel-time curve for single horizontal layer on a half-space:
so velocities gotten from reciprocal of
the slopes of the direct and refracted
segments, and depth gotten from
reflected time intercept (or cross-over
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 5/11
distance). However, often only first
arrivals are recorded:
Single horizontal layer on a half-space, V2>V1:
Alternatively, in terms of Ti2, the intercept time
from the second travel-time segment,
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 6/11
Two horizontal layers on a half-space, V3>V2>V1
where the depth to the lower interface is the sum
of z1 and z2, where z1 is computed by the single-layer formula above.
Single dipping layer on a half-space, V2>V1:
Example of ambiguity problem: Shooting up-dip
gives apparent velocity that is too fast; vice-
versa. VA, up-dip velocity, is too fast (shallow
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 7/11
slope), VB, down-dip velocity is too slow (steeper
dip). Note that, without reversing the profile,
could not distinguish from horizontal case. Notealso the total travel-time from end to end is same
in either direction: reciprocity theorem.
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 8/11
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 9/11
Ambiguity Problem! Low Velocity Layers
never get a refracted head-wave from a
slow layer underlying a fast layer
eventually get head-wave when faster
layer (V>V1) encountered: e.g., V2<V1<V3
The travel time curve will look like this (another
example of ambiguity):
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 10/11
interpreter assumes a layer-over--half-
space model (can't "see" layer 2)
t0 (delay in getting down to layer 3 and
back) is large because V2 is slow
causes layer to be interpreted thicker
than it really is
Typical Reversed Seismic Refraction Profile
7/18/2019 Seismic Refraction Method.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-refraction-methoddocx 11/11