Seismic Attenuation ---from seismic wave travel times to amplitudes Haijiang Zhang Courtesy of many...
-
Upload
bruce-harrison -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Seismic Attenuation ---from seismic wave travel times to amplitudes Haijiang Zhang Courtesy of many...
Seismic Attenuation---from seismic wave travel
times to amplitudes
Haijiang Zhang
Courtesy of many different sources
Haberland et al., GRL 2003
EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE
Earliest measure of earthquake size
Dimensionless number measured various ways, including
ML local magnitude
mb body wave magnitude
Ms surface wave magnitude
Mw moment magnitude
Easy to measure
No direct tie to physics of faulting
(4) intrinsic attenuation: due to anelasticity
the real earth materials are always “lossy”, leading to reduced wave amplitudes, or intrinsic attenuation.
Mechanisms to lose energy:(1) Movements along mineral dislocations(2) Shear heating at grain boundariesThese are called “internal friction”.……
(3) Scattering: A way to partition energy of supposedly main arrivals into boundary or corner diffracted, scattered energy.
Attnuation Mechanisms:
(1) Geometrical spreading: wavefront spreading out while energy per unit area becomes less.
(2) Multipathing: waves seek alternative paths to the receiver. Some are dispersed and some are bundled, thereby affecting amplitudes.
Key: very wavelength dependent.
4
Geometric spreading: light moves outward from lamp in expanding spherical wave fronts. By conservation of energy, the energy in a unit area of the growing wave front decreases as r-2, where r is the radius of the sphere or distance from the lamp.
Analogous to light behavoirs…
Expect minimum at =90º, and maxima at 0º and 180º
GEOMETRIC SPREADING: SURFACE WAVES
From geometric spreading alone, expect minimum at =90º, and maxima at 0º and 180º
Also have effects of anelasticity
For body waves, consider a spherical wavefront moving away from a deep earthquake. Energy is conserved on the expanding spherical wavefront
whose area is 4 π r 2, where r is the radius of the wavefront.
Thus the energy per unit wave front decays as 1 / r2, and the amplitude decreases as 1 / r
GEOMETRIC SPREADING: BODY WAVES
MULTIPATHING
Seismic waves are focused and defocused by variations in velocity.
Idea of Ray Tubes in body waves
Ray tube size affects amplitudes, smaller area means larger amplitude
Angle dependent: ray bundle expands or contracts due to velocity structure. Also: amplitude varies with takeoff angle
Effect of Multipathing
10
Scattering:
Scattering occurs when there are velocity heterogeneities in the medium with wavelengths on the order of λ of the wave.
Snieder et al., Science, 2002
A simulation of 100 randomly-perturbed scatterers…
Moving the scatterers (here, 1/40th of the distance shown,so the perturbation is visible) mostly changes the shapesand amplitudes of the waveforms…
Snieder et al., Science, 2002
Waveformsmeasured in agranite sampleat temperaturesof 45°C (blue)and 50°C (red).
Changing the matrix velocity, by contrast, introduces a shift(delay or advance) that increases with coda time.
Scattering:Interesting aside:
Coda energy in theEarth tends toattenuate much morerapidly than on theMoon!
This is partly becauselunar regolith ishighly fractured byimpacts, but mostlybecause it containsno fluids (andconsequently muchless intrinsicattenuation!)
Intrinsic Attenuation:Intrinsic attenuation, or anelasticity,describes the process by which elastic energyin the Earth is converted to heat when theseismic wave induces unrecoverabledeformation.
To examine this, let’s consider a spring:For an idealized spring,
has solution
with oscillation frequency
More realistically though, internal friction in thespring will damp the system resulting in where is a damping factor and Q 0/
is called the quality factor.
€
m∂ 2u
∂t2+ ku = 0
Mass m
u
Spr
ing
cons
tant
k
€
u t( ) = Aeiω0 t−t0( )
€
0 =k
m
€
m∂ 2u
∂t2+γm
∂u
∂t+ ku = 0
Intrinsic Attenuation:This system has a solution with real andimaginary parts; the actual displacement is thereal part and takes the form:
i.e., a harmonic oscillator with an exponentialdecay of amplitude. Here, A0 is the initialdisplacement (at time t = 0) and
Important to note:
• High frequencies attenuate more than low
• Harmonic frequency is changed by attenuation
• Higher Q results in less change to frequencyand less intrinsic attenuation for given time
Mass m
u
Spr
ing
cons
tant
k
€
Re u t( ){ } = A0e−
ω0t
2Q cosωt
€
=0 1−1
4Q2
Generally,loss of amplitude dueto intrinsicattenuation ismuch greaterthan that dueto partitioning,spreading andthe otheramplitudeeffects wehavediscussed
Definition of the quality factor
1 E
Q 2 E
Energy dissipated in a cycle
Energy stored
€
A = A0 exp −πf
Qt
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
( ) exp( )ij
fRB f
vQ
Putting everything together
€
Aij ( f ) = Si( f )I j ( f )Gij (R)Bij ( f ,R)
Intrinsic attenuation
(1) Movements along mineral dislocations
(2) Shear heating at grain boundaries
• Affected by temperature, pressure, frequency, and medium properties
• Attenuation property is complementary to velocity.
Haberland et al., GRL 2003
Myers et al., 1995
The key here is to correlate a decrease in Q with fluids in the crust and mantle. The fluid layer again represents melting due to subduction.
23
(Romanowicz & Mitchell, 2007)
Nakajima et al., 2003, GRL
How to estimate Q
•Code wave
•Surface wave
•Body wave
•Amplitude data
•…….
Coda wave attenuation
Kumar et al., 2005
Estimating Q from body wave ----- using t*
€
Aij ( f ) = Si( f )I j ( f )Gij (R)Bij ( f ,R)
Site Response
Attenuation Model
ABCE
• Amplitude of horizontal component
• Period
2005 1 1 O=03 15 40.2 +/- 0.04s LAT=26.92 N +/- 0.30km LONG=100.31 E +/- 0.33km DEPTH= 10 km +/- 0.14km STATIONS USED = 6, STAND DEV= 2.63s ML=2.9/ 6, EYA 0.9 202 Pg 03 15 56.4 0.7 Sg 03 16 07.6 -0.1 SMN ML=3.0 0.6 0.20 SME 0.6 0.61 PZH 1.4 108 Pn 03 16 03.1 -2.3 Pg 03 16 05.0 0.9 Sg 03 16 19.4 -3.2 SMN ML=2.9 0.6 0.17 SME 0.7 0.18 XAC 2.1 347 Pn 03 16 15.7 0.5 Pg 03 16 19.6 3.0 Sg 03 16 44.5 -0.4 SMN ML=3.2 1.0 0.11 SME 1.0 0.23 TCG1 2.5 221 Pg 03 16 24.0 0.0 Sg 03 16 55.7 -2.2 SMN ML=3.7 0.6 0.52 SME 0.5 0.42 KMI 2.8 128 Pg 03 16 28.9 -1.1 Sg 03 17 07.4 -1.1 SMN ML=2.8 0.8 0.045 SME 0.7 0.047 ZOT 3.1 82 ePg 03 16 36.8 2.5 Sg 03 17 14.6 -1.5 SMN ML=2.8 1.0 0.031 SME 1.0 0.038
Amplitude Q tomography(Shunping Pei)
Theory and Method
Source
Station
Crust
Upper mantle
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( , )ij j i i ij ijA f O f I f S f G R B f R
10( ) exp( ) exp( )ij
fRB f cQ R
vQ
1 /c f v 0Q Q f 1
0ln ( ) ln ( )ij ij ij i jY A f G R a b Q cR
ln ( )i ia S f 0ln ( )jb O f
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( , )ij j i i ij ijA f O f I f S f G R B f R
10ln ( ) ln ( ) *ij ij ij L i jY A f G R p M a b Q cR
0ln ( ) *j Lb O f p M
10ij i j k ijk
k
Y a b Q cR
ML Tomography in North China
ABCE of 1985 to 1995(Annual Bulletin of Chinese Earthquakes)
1. Each event was recorded by at least 2 stations,2. Residuals between -2.0 ~ 2.0 ,3. Period T of the Sg wave maximum amplitude (A) is between 0.4~2.0s,4. Epicentral distance is between 100km-800km.5. Event depth is less than 20km.
10899 amplitude data1732 events91 stations
10899 Amplitude data1732 Events (+)91 Stations (▲)
Histogram of ML distribution
Result
Earthquakes with M>7
Phillips et al., 2005
Q from the tomographic inversion of 1 Hz Lg amplitude ratios
Liu et al., 2004
10ij i j k ijk
k
Y a b Q cR
10ij i j k ijk
k
Y a b Q cR
Checkerboard Test
2°× 2°
Checkerboard Test
1.5°× 1.5°
Standard deviation 0.67
Standard deviation 0.41
Summary• Crustal attenuation can be reconstructed by tomographic
imaging method using amplitude data.• Attenuation levels are correlated with regional tectonic structure. High attenuation often occurs in active tectonic areas with
significant faulting, while attenuation is low in the stable Ordos Craton.
• The estimate of attenuation shows a close correlation with topography.
Q0 is generally low in basins, whereas high Q0 mostly occurs in mountains and uplift regions where crystalline basement appears in the surface. It is possible that low Q0 in basins is caused by fluid in the upper crust, and deep sediment in basins, while high Q0 in the mountains and uplift regions results from the presence of old, dense rocks there.
(Published in BSSA(2006))