REPORT

Wg// and Resen'oir

Site Selection

for

Sanitary District #1

Toum of Hallie

SEH File: 90111

November 6, 1990

EMC/MECffS • ARCHITECTS • PLAHNIRS 421 FPENETTE DRIVE, CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN 54729 7!S 723-8506

November 6, 1990

RE: Hallie Sanitary District No. 1Well and Reservoir SiteSEH File: 90111

Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWest Central DistrictEau Claire Area2004 Highland AvenueEau Claire, Wisconsin 54701

Attention: Steven Thon

Dear Sirs:

Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesBureau of Water Supply101 S. Webster StreetP. O. Box 7921Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921

Attention: Lee Boushon

Enclosed per our discussion, we are forwarding for your review a copy of the Sanitary District No.1, Town of Hallie, Well and Reservoir Site Selection. Please review the enclosed information asit is important to the district that we get your concurrence prior to release of the funding forpurchase of this site.

r

Sincerely,

Clarence Stoffel, P.E.Project Manager

pew

Enclosure

cc: ^MfT'Mike Gifford, EPAMr. David Meier, Town ChairmanMr. David Raihle, District Legal CounselMr. Richard Nauman, NPIMs. Shirley Sippel, Clerk

SHORT ELLIOTTHENDPlCKSON INC

sr PAUL.MINNESOTA

CHIPPEWA FALLS,WISCONSIN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 12.0 Well Location.............................................................................................................. 1

2.1 Site Selection................................................................................................... 12.2 Location........................................................................................................... 1

3.0 Test Well Construction and Testing........................................................................ 23.1 Drilling and Casing........................................................................................ 23.2 Test Pumping and Sampling........................................................................ 2

4.0 Conclusions................................................................................................................. 3

List of AppendicesAppendix A - Well Location StudyAppendix B - Public Well Site SurveyAppendix C - Well Location MapsAppendix D - Boring Log for Test WellAppendix E - Test Pump Draw Down and Recovery DataAppendix F - Analytical Results of Water Samples

Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. 421 Frenette Drive Chippewa Falls, Wl 54729 (715)723-8506

1.0 IntroductionA comprehensive study for the location of a municipal water supply for the SanitaryDistrict was conducted in the Fall of 1989. The purpose of the study was to locate amunicipal water supply that would provide:

1. Quality water

2. Sufficient quantity

3. Have potential for long term quality and supply

4. Be located in the Town of Hallie

5. Be economically feasible

In a November 1989 report of the study entitled, "Report of the Hallie Well LocationStudy", a recommendation was made to secure land options in a four section area Eastof the affected area of the District. A copy of the well location study is included inAppendix A.

2.0 Well Location2.1 Site Location

After review of specific land parcels in Sections 25 and 36 and T28N, R8W andSections 30 and 31 of T28N, R9W, a 12.5 acre parcel of the Nesj'a Estate wasoptioned by the District for consideration and purchase. This parcel, in additionto having the projected required hydrogeology, was unique in that it alsoincludes a hill with a high point elevation which is ideal for water deliverypressure to the District.

Prior to finalization of the option, a well site inspection was conducted by a DNRWest Central District Engineer. The site was found to meet the locational criteriaand a site inspection report was completed. This report is included in AppendixB, "Public Well Site Survey".

2.2 LocationThe well location is shown on the "Proposed Watermain Map" and Exhibit 8which have been extracted from the report to the Public Service Commission andare included in Appendix C.

Sanitary District #1 - Town of Hallie Page 1

3.0 Test Well Construction and Testing3.1 Drilling and Casing

A test well was drilled on November 13, 1989 near the proposed well locationshown on the Proposed Watermain Map. An air rotary drilling technique with afoam additive was utilized to flush the cuttings from the drill hole and a six inchdiameter welded steel casing was advanced into the sandstone bedrock to adepth of 30 feet below the surface and grouted 27 feet into the sandstone. A sixinch diameter hole was then advanced to a total 118 feet below the surface withthe last seven feet being drilled into weathered granite. Sandstone wasencountered at three feet below the surface and the static water table was foundat a depth of 41.9 feet below the surface. A boring log with well constructiondetails is shown in Appendix D.

The ground surface elevation was measured to be 921.7 feet (MSL) and the staticwater surface at 878.7 after construction on December 13,1989.

3.2 Test Pumping and SamplingA 21 hour pump test was started on December 14, 1989. A submersible pumpwas set at 99 feet below grade and pumped at a rate of 110 gallons per minute(GPM) for the first 15.5 hours. The rate was then increased to 132 gpm for theremainder of the test to produce a total draw down of 32.15 feet. Water sampleswere taken for indicator parameters (alkalinity, chloride, hardness, nitrate-nitrogen, total dissolved solids, dissolved iron, dissolved manganese, pH,conductivity, color, turbidity and odor) at intervals of 2,4,6,12,16 and 20 hours.A water sample for pesticide testing was taken after 15 hours of pumping, andvolatile organic compound (VOC) samples were taken after 15 and 20 hours ofpumping. A sample for Radon gas was also collected after 13 hours of pumping.The test pump draw down and recovery data is included in Appendix E.

Two subsequent sets of water samples were taken on February 6,1990 and March21,1990. A four inch submersible pump was operated for more than 20 minutesat a rate of about 17 gpm to remove over 340 gallons of water or approximatelythree well volumes before sampling. Samples were collected for indicatorparameters, additional metals, Radon, Radium and VOC's. A duplicate set ofsamples were collected for metals on the third sampling round to check for anytesting discrepancies. The analytical data for all water samples is included inAppendix F.

Sanitary District #1 - Town of Hallie Page 2

4.0 Conclusions1. Hydrogeological conditions found at this site very closely parallel the proposed

conditions as reported in the Well Location Study.

2. The water quality found is excellent with all parameters within established qualitystandards.

3. A production well at this site should produce somewhere between 100,000 and300,000 gallons per day based on the modeling completed to date.

4. Since the water is very soft, the final design should include pH adjustment toreduce the corrosivity of the water.

5. The elevation of the on-site hill provides for adequate delivery pressure for theDistrict system.

6. The option for purchase of the site be exercised and final plans and specificationsfor the water system be completed per NR 111.

Respectively submitted,

Frank Lowry, S*1^Hydrogeologist

Clarence Stoffel, P.E.Project Manager

Sanitary District #1 - Town of Hallie Page 3

APPENDIX A

WELL LOCATION STUDY

REPORT OF THEHALLIE WELL LOCATION STUDY

SANITARY DISTRICT #1SEH File: 90097November 1989

Respectively Submitted:

pf John R. Tinker,Certified Groundwater Professional

Frank Lowry, Hydrogectfogisy, EIT

Clarence Stoffel. P.E.Project Manager

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PageI. Introduction

A. Purpose 2B. Background 2C. Scope of Study 3D. Topography, Geology and Hydrogeology 4

II. ProceduresA. Mapping Hydrogeologic Information 6B. Location of Possible Contamination Quality 7C. Investigation of Groundwater Quality 8D. Estimation of Aquifer Capacity 9

III Results 12

IV Discussion of Water Supply Needs 13

V Conclusions and RecommendationsA. Conclusions 13B. Recommendations 14

VI Bibliography 15

List of Figures1 Potential Contamination Sources2 Topography3 Water Table Contours4 Contours of the Cambrian Sandstone Surface5 Contours of the Crystalline Precambrian Bedrock Surface

AppendicesA Water Quality Information from Private WellsB Geologic Cross Sections of the Mt. Simon FormationC Aquifer Capacity Data

I. INTRODUCTIONSanitary District #1, Town of Hallie. retained Short Elliott

Hendrickson, Inc. to conduct a well location study for the purpose oflocating a potable water supply for the district. The Town of Hallie is

located on the southern border of Chippewa County. Wisconsin, east

of the Chippewa River, north of the City of Eau Claire and south of the

City of Chippewa Falls. Most of the sanitary district lies within the

southwest quadrant of the township along the east side of USHighway 53 and north of Eau Claire. Both sides of the highway arelined with businesses with residential areas situated east and west of

the business district.

A. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to locate areas in the Town ofHallie which could be utilized as a municipal water supply for

the Sanitary District. The water supply must be potable,provide an adequate quantity for present and future needs, and

lie within the political and economic constraints of the

township.

B. BackgroundMany private wells in the southwest quarter of the Town of

Hallie are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOC).In the U.S. EPA Administrative Order, VW-89-C-015, the source

of contamination was determined to be from one or more wastedisposal practices conducted at the National Presto Industriessite from the early 1940's through early 1984. As a result ofreleases which present an imminent endangerment to publichealth, residents in the "affected" area have been drinkingbottled water, and " . . . it is necessary to reevaluate selected

-2-

alternatives for a permanent water supply for residents andbusinesses in the affected area" (U.S. EPA, Order #VW-81-C-015, page 9). The "affected" area is that area of the Town ofHallie that is presently contaminated or is threatened bycontamination.

The findings of this study will be used to locate a public watersupply for residents in the "affected" area and also for other

areas in the Town of Hallie that want to become part of thesanitary district. The current consumptive water supply need of

the "affected" area is about 80,000 gallons per day (gpd). Thewater demand of the district as it will enlarge in two to threeyears is estimated to be 320,000 gpd.

C. Scope of the StudyThe entire Town of Hallie was studied in searching for a

municipal water supply. Information on the location of the VOCcontamination plume, landfill sites, and other possible sourcesof groundwater contamination were studied and mapped (Fig.

r

I). Well construction reports and geologic logs were used tomap the geologic and hydrogeologic features of the area as wellas interpret aquifer characteristics. Then, water samples fromexisting private water supply wells were sampled and tested todetermine locations where the groundwater quality wasacceptable for a municipal water supply (Appendix A).

The service areas considered for consumptive water useincluded present and near future needs and future needs 10years from the present. The present needs for the "affected"area are approximately 80,000 gpd. Within 2 to 3 years the

-3-

District water supply needs could expand to 320,000 gpd. Theneeds of the district 10 years from now could be as high as600,000 gpd depending on the growth of the district. The ruralareas in the eastern portion of the township were notconsidered for future municipal water supply needs because of

the low population density.

D. Topography, Geology and Hydrogeology of the TownshipThe landscape in the township is generally flat-lying sand and

gravel deposits with steep sandstone hills and ridgesdominating the eastern half of the township. The flat-lying areasare around 900 feet above mean sea level, and the hills andridges rise to a maximum of 1060 feet above mean sea level.

The Town of Hallie is located in the glaciated area of the state.Deposits of glacial drift overlie most of the sandstone bedrock.

The glacial drift consists of unpitted outwash fWGNHS. 1970,p.4). These sand and gravel deposits are thin or absent in thehills on the east side of the township and over 100-feet thick tothe west where preglacial and glacial erosion created bedrockvalleys in the sandstone.

The sandstone throughout the township drift is the Mt. SimonFormation of Cambrian age. This sandstone experienceddifferent degrees of erosion in the township prior to depositionof the glacial drift. Therefore, the Mt. Simon is thin or absent inthe eroded bedrock valleys where the glacial deposits arethickest, to over 250 feet thick on the hilltops where the glacialdeposits are absent. The basal portion of the Mt. SimonFormation has a larger particle size than the middle and upper

-4-

portions. Therefore, the basal portion should be able to transmitlarger quantities of water than the middle and upper portions ofthe formation. Appendix B contains cross sections of the Mt.

Simon Formation as it occurs in western Wisconsin.

Precambrian age igneous and metamorphic rocks underlie thesandstone. These crystalline rocks are eroded, and the uppersurface of this unit dips to the southwest at an average rate of10 feet per mile according to Dr. Paul Myers, geology professor

at the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. The Geologic Log for

the Town of HaJlie well, well logs for private wells along theChippewa River and outcrop locations in the City of ChippewaFalls were used to verify the elevation of this surface.Precambrian age igneous and metamorphic rock is not capableof transmitting large quantities of water unless it is highly

fractured.

The glacial drift and the Cambrian sandstone are the twoaquifers which were considered for the municipal water supply.The glacial drift aquifer is thickest in the western half of theTownship where the water table is about 20-25 feet below thesurface. The glacial drift aquifer is capable of transmittingrelatively large quantities of water. The sandstone aquifer liesbelow the drift and above the crystalline rock and is capable oftransmitting relatively small to large quantities of waterdepending on its characteristics at the well site. The thicknessof each aquifer is an important factor in determining its abilityto yield water.

-5-

E. Previous WorkReports used to supplement this study include maps andpublications from the Wisconsin Geological and Natural HistorySurvey (WGNHS), published and unpublished information from

the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR), as wellas other studies completed in regards to the National PrestoIndustries groundwater contamination problem. Thesedocuments are presented in the bibliography.

U. PROCEDURESA. Mapping Hydrogeologic Information

A total of 736 Well Constructor's Reports and 5 Geologic Logs

were used to map the thickness of the glacial drift andsandstone aquifers within the township. The Well Constructor'sReports are logs that the well driller should submit each timehe drills a private well. These reports indicate the location ofthe well, depth to groundwater, type of material encounteredwhile drilling the well, well drawdown while pumping, andother information. The Geologic Logs usually contain the sameinformation. However, the geologic information is moredetailed, because the WGNHS has reviewed the drill cuttingswhich are collected by the driller. A geologic log is completedfor high capacity wells (greater than 70 gpm) and public watersupply wells.

These reports and logs were used in conjunction with thetownship map and USGS topographic quadrangle maps toprepare maps showing "Topography" (Fig. 2); "Water TableContours" (Fig. 3); "Contours of the Cambrian SandstoneSurface" (Fig. 4); and "Contours of the Crystalline Precambrian

-6-

Bedrock Surface" (Fig. 5). These maps were used to determine

the projected aquifer thicknesses.

B. Location of Possible Contamination SourcesThere are several sources of groundwater contamination in theTown of Hallie. The largest and best documented is the National

Presto Industries contamination plume. The Town of HallieLandfill, the City of Chippewa Falls Landfill, and the SchneiderSalvage Yard are additional potential contamination sources. Thearea DNR engineer was contacted to assist in identifying otherareas of potential groundwater contamination, but no significant

additional pollution sources were identified.

Other potential sources of contamination were considered aspart of this study. Subdivisions served by septic-tank, soilabsorption systems are a possible source of nitratecontamination (Tinker, 1989) Underground petroleum storage

tanks and certain types of business and industry are alsopotential sources of contamination.

The WGNHS has published informational maps of groundwaterquality in Chippewa County. These maps contain information on

levels of nitrate-nitrogen (NOg-N), chloride (Cl), pH, total

hardness, conductivity and iron from specific samplinglocations. This information provided a general background ofwater quality in the township which helped identify areas ofpoor groundwater quality.

-7-

C. Investigation of Groundwater QualityUndocumented reports of poor groundwater quality in theTownship raised some concern for finding an acceptablemunicipal water supply. It was assumed that the glacial drift

aquifer could provide relatively good quality water. However.there is little separation between possible near surfacecontamination sources and the top of the glacial drift aquifer.The Cambrian sandstone aquifer usually provides a better

separation distance from possible contamination source, butthis aquifer is often high in iron and manganese metals. The

objective was to find potential well locations which wereremoved from possible sources of contamination yet providedgood quality water.

After considering all of the information, an area of four square

miles east of the "affected" area was selected for further study.Several homeowners in Sections 25 and 36, T28N, R9W andSections 30 and 31, T28N, R8W of the township were

r

interviewed to discuss the quality of the water from theirprivate wells. The comments ranged from "excellent quality" to"very bad". Most of the private well owners described theirwater as having low pH and/or high iron content.

To better determine the quality of the groundwater in this area,seven private wells were tested for chloride, hardness, nitrate-nitrogen, pH, total dissolved solids, dissolved iron, dissolvedmanganese, fecal coliform and 34 VOC compounds. Four of thewells sampled have Well Constructor's Reports which indicatethat these wells terminate in the Cambrian sandstone aquifer.It is assumed that the other three wells are in or at least

-8-

partially penetrate the sandstone aquifer. The locations, welllogs and sampling results for these wells are reported inAppendix A.

The water quality in six of the seven wells can be consideredas very good, because all substances tested were at or below thePreventive Action Limit (PAL). PAL's are Public Welfare andPublic Health Groundwater Quality Standards which areexpressed in Chapter NR140, Groundwater Quality, of theWisconsin Administrative Code. Well Number HA-01 hasdissolved iron and dissolved manganese contents which exceedthe PAL and the Public Welfare Groundwater QualityEnforcement Standards (NR140). Well Number HA-04 has adissolved manganese level which is at the PAL. The pH in all ofthe wells is relatively low (4.7-5.0) as is the hardness (10-39ppm).

D. Estimation of Aquifer CapacityAs water is removed from a well, the water level is lowered inthe vicinity of the well with the greatest drawdown occurring atthe well. This lowering in water level near the well causes waterto move toward the well from all directions. This area is calledthe cone of depression of the well. The size and shape of thecone of depression depends on the rate at which water ispumped from the well, the location of aquifer boundaries, andthe properties of the aquifer itself. The most important aquiferproperties are the thickness and horizontal extent of theaquifer, the ability of the aquifer to release water from storage(storage coefficient), and the capacity of the aquifer to transmitwater (transmissivity).

-9-

Mapping of the glacial drift and sandstone aquifers, topography,water table, and Precambrian bedrock surface provided theinformation on thickness and horizontal extent of the aquifers.(Figs 2-5) The storage coefficients were estimated for eachaquifer. For an unconfined aquifer, as exists in the Town ofHallie, the storage coefficient can be set equal to the specificyield (Fetter, 1988, p. 107). The specific yield for each aquiferwas estimated using approximate values based on the nature ofthe material. A specific yield of 0.25 was used for the sandy

glacial drift and 0.10 for the fine to medium to coarse grainsandstone (Fetter. 1988 p.71 and 74).

Transmissivity is equal to the thickness of the aquifermultiplied by its hydraulic conductivity (Freeze and Cherry,1979, page 59). The hydraulic conductivity is a coefficient ofproportionality describing the rate at which water can move

through a permeable medium (Fetter, 1988. p. 571). Acomputerized technique for estimating the hydraulicconductivity of aquifers from specific capacity data was used todetermine the hydraulic conductivity of the glacial drift andsandstone beneath the Town of Hallie (Bradbury and Rothschild,1985). The arithmetic mean and standard deviation for thehydraulic conductivity of the glacial drift is Sections 24 and 25.

T28N. R9W is 1.6xlOE-3 ft/sec. ± 1.4xlOE-3 ft/sec.respectively. The hydraulic conductivity of the Cambriansandstone in Sections 24 and 25, T28N. R9W and Section 19

and 30, T28N. R8W is 1.3xlOE-4 ft/sec ± 1.4xE10-4 ft/sec.

The aquifer capacity was then estimated using the aboveinformation and the Theis equation. Although there are

-10-

numerous assumptions to the Theis equation, this equationprovides useful predictions as to the amount of drawdown in apumping well and the size of the cone of depression adjacent to

the pumping well (Bom et al, 1988, p. 11). One of theassumptions made in estimating the aquifer capacities was that

no recharge is made to the aquifer during the selected pumpingperiod. The Theis equation (Freeze and Cherry, 1979) can beexpressed as:

D = _Q_ W(u)4T

where D = selected amount of drawdownQ= pumping rate of wellT = transmissivity of the aquiferW(u) = the well function of u

2where u = r S

4Tt

and r= distance from the pumping well to the point wherethe drawdown in the cone of depression equals theselected drawdown. (Assume 1.0 foot).

S= storage coefficient of the aquifer

t = selected duration of pumping

Drawdowns were calculated for each aquifer using different pumprates at different hydraulic conductivities and aquifer thicknesses. Anydrawdown which exceeded 67% of the aquifer thickness was

-11-

considered unacceptable. This information is presented in Tables 1thru 7 in Appendix C.

RESULTSThe results show that one well in the sandstone aquifer is capable ofproviding 100,000 gpd and the glacial drift aquifer is capable ofproviding 500,000 gpd assuming the mean hydraulic conductivity, asaturated thickness of 70 feet and pumping period of one year in eachcase. With an increase of one standard deviation, one well in thesandstone aquifer is capable of providing 300,000 gpd assuming themean hydraulic conductivity, a saturated thickness of 70 feet and apumping period of one year. However, if the hydraulic conductivity forthe sandstone aquifer is one standard deviation less than the meanthen one well will not provide 100,000 gpd for three days. The glacialdrift aquifer could provide 100,000 gpd even if its hydraulicconductivity is one standard deviation below the mean.

If the sandstone aquifer is used, two wells spaced 800 feet apart mayyield 300,000 gpd assuming the mean hydraulic conductivity, asaturated thickness of 70 feet and a pumping period of 30 days. Threeor more wells with appropriate spacing may yield 450,000 gpd underthese same conditions.

The southeast quarter of Section 25 and northeast quarter of Section36, T28N, R9W and the southwest quarter of Section 30 andnorthwest quarter of Section 31. T28N, R8W has areas where theCambrian sandstone aquifer is estimated to be 80 feet thick. This areais about one mile east of the Sanitary District and is removed fromsubdivisions served by septic-tank soil absorption systems,underground petroleum storage tanks and businesses which could

-12-

impact the ground water. This area of interest is also upgradient andseparated from the National Presto Industries contamination plume.

IV. DISCUSSION OF WATER SUPPLY NEEDSThe estimated water supply needs were based on the present andprojected population of the Sanitary District using an average of 80gallons per person per day. Petitions to enlarge the Sanitary Districtare presently being received. There are no large industrial waterusers in the Township. Population estimates and associated water useestimates are as follows:

Estimated Population of Estimated WaterYear the Sanitary District Use (gpd)1990 1000 80,0001991 2500 200,0001992 4000 320,0002010 7500 600,000

V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSA. Conclusions

r

One well located in the Cambrian Sandstone aquifer couldprovide the present and near future water supply needs of theSanitary District. This well should penetrate at least 80 feet of

the sandstone aquifer. The water supply needs of the SanitaryDistrict 5 to 20 years from the present can be met by installingone or more additional wells as the water supply needs of theDistrict grow.

A well located in Section 25 and 36 of R8W or in Sections 30and 31 of R9W should have the potential to provide qualitywater on a long term basis.

-13-

B. RecommendationsRecommendations for locating the well are as follows:1. Efforts should be made to secure options for a land

purchase in the area where the estimated Cambrian

sandstone aquifer is 70 feet thick or more.

2. The sandstone hills in Sections 25 and 36, T28N shouldbe considered for a water storage tank location because ofthe topographic highs and efforts should be made tosecure an option for land purchase on the most suitablelocation.

3. A test well and a piezometer should be drilled at theselected location. A pump test should be conducted onthe test well while the piezometer is used to measure thedrawdown of the water table.

4. If the sandstone aquifer can provide can acceptable qualityand quantity of potable water, a well head protection planshould be set-up to help protect the quality of the groundwater for the future.

-14-

VI BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Bom, S. Yanggen, D., Czecholinski, A, Tiemey, R.. and

Hennings, R, 1988, Wellhead-Protection Districts in Wisconsin:An analysis and Test Applications, Wisconsin Geological and

Natural History Survey Special Report 10.

2. Bradbury, K.R. and Rothschild, E.R., 1985, A ComputerizedTechnique for Estimating the Hydraulic Conductivity of Aquifersfrom Specific Capacity Data: Ground Water, V 23, No. 2. pages240-246.

3. Camp Dresser and McKee. 1987, Sampling and Analysis Plan forEau Claire Municipal Well Field Eau Claire, Wisconsin: DocumentNo. 275-R11-OP-ESBZ-1 as submitted to U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency.

4. Camp Dresser and McKee, 1987, Phase I Field TechnicalMemorandum Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, Eau Claire,Wisconsin: Document No. 68-01-0639 as submitted to U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.

4.5 Eder Associates, 1989. Water Table Contour Map September1988 for National Presto Industries, Inc: RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study.

5. Fetter, C.W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology: Merrill PublishingCompany, 592 p.

6. Foth & Van Dyke Associates, 1986. Existing Conditions Report,North Eau Claire: Project #85 W 16 as submitted to theWisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

-15-

7. Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, John A., 1979. Groundwater: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 604 p.

8. Hickock, E.A., 1967, Ground-Water Investigation for the City of

Eau Claire, Wisconsin: submitted to the City of Eau Claire,

Wisconsin.

9. Hickock, E.A. and Associates, 1983, Well Field InvestigationInterim Report, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.

10. Hickock, E.A. and Associates, 1983, Airport Hydrogeological

Investigation Part A-Seismic Study, Eau Claire. Wisconsin.

11. Hickock, E.A. and Associates, 1984, Airport HydrogeologicalInvestigation Part B-Seismic Study, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.

12. Tinker, J., 1989, A Report submitted to the Wisconsin DNR:

Impact of Nitrate-Nitrogen from Unsewered Subdivisions ofGround Water.

13. University of Wisconsin - Extension. Geological and NaturalHistory Survey. Ground Water Quality Investigation of ChippewaCounty, Wisconsin. Lippelt, I.D., 1987, Plates 1-7.

14. Walton, W.C., 1985, Thirty-Five Basic Groundwater Programs forDesktop Microcomputers: International Ground Water ModelingCenter, Program B8.

15. WGNHS, 1970, Field Trip Guide Book for Cambrian-OrdovicianGeology of Western Wisconsin, Information Circ. #11.

-16-

T O W N O F H A L L I ECHIPPEWA COUNTY

WISCONSIN

IOI-

UNITED STATEJ 00*1. LAHC HICMWAT

ST*TE T*UM< HIGHWAY

COUNTY T*U*H HICHWAY

TOWM OH JEKVICE KOAO

fftOPEATr OtrHCHSHIP Um<

suaoivrsiox

N* y/

C(||of ClUppew^^Tajdfill

/ •-,.-- _v-.-.•*V£/.'\ ZSZ———'•

uuiis

LOTS

__SCALE l":3000' WvV—————7O 1500 3000 M\ ./;

——————— ^ »•

ot blallie lf£nd« ^^^^ 'iS'fD^ 1 •! I *•"* (it i /-fly ' ******'k•*•""* " !SiVi« «J~il "" *'i

/.COLONY AMD

SCKOOl .'I

16

Town of wnr Di!ichi

xK, : 2!?.

mt-,s/*Xto:'M'M.',SW»//'M,.M.,.:$,/t3') J I

W' > *!—j^'1

Industries SI|F; T.____sfTr-TT

i

£AU~CLAIRE~~

i !

iCOUNTY_COUNTY "* '

^<?.

-JJ _. I.

SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 1, TOWN OF HALLIEWELL LOCATION STUDY

tHCINftOS • AffHfTWCTS • PLAHHCKS

POTENTIAL CONTAMINATIONSOURCES

FILE NO.90097

FIG. NO.1

T O W N O F H A L L I EC H I P P E W A C O U N T Y

W I S C O N S I N

UNITED STATES DUAL LANE HlSHWAr

STATE TRUNK MIOXWAT

jW COUNTT TRUNK MI6HWAT

= TOWN OR SERVICE ROAO

""""" PWJfERTr OWNERSHIP MARK

N

i———J SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY%%%$%%& CORPORATE LIMITS

J} ' ! GOVERNMENT LOTS

SCALE l"=3000'0 1500 3000

EAU CLAIRE

SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 1, TOWN OF HALLIEWELL LOCATION STUDY

fNCINfffrS t AfCMfTKTS m PIAHHEKS

TOPOGRAPHYRUE NO.90097

FIG. NO.

2

T O W N O F H A L L I EC H I P P E W A C O U N T Y

W I S C O N S I N

«V29l i

UNITED STATES DUAL LAME MICHWAT

STATE TKUMK HICHWAT

COUNTY TRUNK HIGHWAY

TOWN OH SEAVlCC AOAO

MA*<

N

LIMITS

T LOTS

WELL LOCATION STUDYfHCIHClfrS • APCHITfCTSf PIANHCHS

WATER TABLE CONTOURSFIL£ NO.90097FIG.

3

UNlTCO STATCJ OUAt LANC

STATE TXUN< HIGHWAY

J )* COUMTT TXUNK HICMWAT

TOWN Oft JCKVICt HOAO

OWNERSHIP MARK

T O W N O F H A L L I EC H I P P E W A COUNTY

WISCONSIN

N

i.———J SUBDIVISION BOUHOAUT

! LIMITS

'S ' I COveftNHCNT UOTS

HrnnnTfcmi

SCALE l"=3000'0 1500 30OO

I zg N,T 27 N.

SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 1, TOWN OF HALLIEWELL LOCATION STUDY

tncineias •

CONTOURS OF THE CAMBRIANSANDSTONE SURFACE

RLE NO.90097

FIG. NO.4

T O W N O F H A L L I EC H I P P E W A C O U N T Y

W I S C O N S I N

COUNTY T*UN« HIGHWAY

TOWN on service »o*0

!J|JnA-: lj: jp-jl

SCALE I"; 3000'I5OO 30OO

rn i i • i1L l l i Ll_L _j_( f f .p -;—. j.-;;;£5£3s

EAU CLAIRE

SANITARY DISTRI(5T^onTTOWN~oFT IiWELL LOCATION STUDY

Atremrfcrs •

CONTOURS OF THE CRYSTALLINECAMBRIAN BEDROCK SURFACE FIG. NO.

5

APPENDIX A

t .

'A -.

t

-g/Qg-- pe

Coif'1 iZrtZt}

M-A5

l O K ' S RH'ORTKov 2.79

( 01 NIT l i i l i C K i / l OM N'.unc

-\ ! A O «j!" *—_____X?Town________U VJIagei Section .';r Gov ' t L o * S o c : tor Township Pan^c - \ v

LOCATIONOK ( I r i J or Si-ed N'o. S t r i c t • '>• Kn. id N . IML-

\ N I ) - - I t . i v u i l . i h l e x u b d u n i n n n . i m e . k i t & b l o c k N o .

3 . N ' A M i : IAGENT AT TIME OF DRILLING CHECK (s> ONE

- - _POST 0 1 T1CE ' "

Pf (to on ex. Z_c=»Floor Drain

Connected T oDistance in feel from well! Bunding S a n < : a r y Blag. Drain S a n . t a r y Bidg. Sewerlonearest: ( R e c o r d C.I. Other C . I . Othei C.I . Sewer other Sewer canswer i n a p p r o p r i a t e

Stc r r r B ^ O g . Drain S t o r m S lcy .

Other C.I. , O:he

5an. Storm C. i . Other

Sewers (Foundat ion DrainCo^nnectecl to| Sewage Sumo. " — —— • "(~~T"~ ^nth*Tr~

SewerClearwaterDr.

Sump

Clearwa te r ; Septic Ho ld ing 'Sewage Absorpt ion Unit Manure HO DoerSump i Tank i Tank i <;»„„,„. D ,—————————— Re ten t i on or

Pnuematic T a r k____i Clearwater "' Sumo

~^rP,,

Seepage BedSeepage Trench

P'ivy Pet ; Pi t : Nonconf orming Exist ing Subsurface Pumproom Barn Animal Animal Silo Glass Linedwaste —— — • — , ———————————— ———— : ——— : —— Z~:~T —— ~Gj:ter, Barn : Yard Wi th Pit StoragePit : well __________________ Nonconformmg Ex is t ing ^ Pen . | Facility

1 Pump __________ '•• j• Tank ; '

Si lo ' Earthen Sw/o s torage TiPit Or P.t

lage Ear thenench.Manure Basi l

Temporary Manure , Watert ight Liquid Manure [Subsur face Waste Pond or Land Manure Storage BasinStacK or P la t fo rm | Manure Tank or Pressure JGaso lmeo r i Disposal Unit Concrete Floor Only—

Other (Descr ibe)

~ ' " ' """' C o n c r e t e Floor andP a r t i a l Concrete Wans

;. Well is intended to supply water for: • /

, . D R I L LDia. ( in . )

fc»

lo'. CASIN

Dia. (in.)

t

HOLEFrom ( t t . ) ITo (f t . ) Dia. (in.)

Surface I 4 ^

K U noG. LINER, CURBING AND SCREEf

Material, Weight, SpecificationMfg. & Method of Assembly

f^ft-V^Ofl,r*

x8. GROUT OR OTHER SEALING MATERIA

Kind

ftiA/\e*\V

From ( f t . ) To ( f t . )

>j

From (ft .) To (f t . )O f\

Surface /5 /^.

LFrom (ft.) To ( f t . )

Surface ^\J

1 1 . MISCELLANEOUS DATA . .Yield Test: ^ Hrs. at —— tQ ———— GPM

Depth from surface to normal water level J^ j) Ft.

Depth of water level ^\ O .~-^S//'when pumping |3C 1 Ft. Stabilized S*Yes CH No

9 FORMATIONSKind From (f t . ) ! To ( f t . )

(5/T/l/T) Surface (?

£\ci\J Gi>\s £~CI/G>S'JCA£- <y ftj$ ijlvA) S~"ftv\^ /t3 5&

1

1

110. TYPE OF DRILLING MACHINE USEE

Rotary-narr,-r,/ l i — i w /d r i l l i ngLt/CaDle Tool j l _ 1 mud 4 a i r. — | Rotary-air . — , Rotary-han1 _ 1 w /a r i l lmg mud 1 — 1 & air• — , R o t a r y - w / d r i l l i n g . — ,1 _ 1 mud 1 — 1 Reverse Ro

merHZ! Je t t ing with

imer [ ] Air

i 1 ] Wa te r

t a ry

Well construction completed on if *""" «^* 19 ffl

Well is terminated —— L*= —— inches

Well disinfected upon completion

Well sealed watertight upon completion

[Q^above r , _,, _ , final gradeCH below ^

1&*Y^ CH No

(3 Yes CH No

Water sample sent to laboratory on

Your opinion concerning other pollution hazards, information concerning difficulties encountered, and data relating to nearby well*, screens, seals, method offinishing the well, amount of cement used in grouting, blasting, etc., should be given on reverse side.

Business Name and Complete

Registered Well DrillerCo

Address

./*"V «-.->**<* .-.tfW* &+**** *m * J . IM i••.-»-•«

^ o JJ

T> • "

+<

,6

i: I

12£_ -C.ty

TO tii n.IIMC. lul A. H.Kk Ni.

^AMI £ OWIY.ER __ ,AGENTAT TIME OF DRILLING CHECK </) ONE

- K. /...I'OSl 01 H(T.

I Pit tance in feet from \\cll Buiidmq 5jn Mry Bing jr j iIn nearest : ;Ro-inswei in J O D ' o p r H

C.i.S.ln.Mi y Blot). S

C. O l l ie

F lo31 D rainCon "ected T- Stnr - B:a?.

C J . S e w e r O t n e r S e w e r Cl G t h e' C

' in Blag. Sev

Other

S t r p e : Sewer , O;her Sowers .Foundation Dram Connected to.J Sewage Surnp

S^n. r 'V torm "c.l. " o t h e r " "Sew«~" l"""!^6""" " "' -""aTh¥7

Seot c Holding Sewage Absorn' . ion Dm'. ManurTanu Tank "i——————n~,'~ —— - - - - - - ne:er

Seepage P;t Pnue-

CTearwaterDr.

C'earwaterSumo 6'1 Seepage 8eg ~~f~&J£>

• Seepage Trench

e Hooper ?r

'.a! ic Tank

ivy Pe! P^lj^ Nonconformmg Exis t ing Subsur face PUITIDTOO^ Bam Animal AnJrna l Si lo G lass Lined Siio E a r t h e n S ' t a q ew a s t e -•— -- - - - - - - - - - — - — — — — - ~ — - ------- -__ —— — -—^ u^ t e r Sarn Yard Wi th Pit, S to rage A--'O S t o r a q e T ' e n c "Pit Wel l . _____________ Nonconformmg E x i s t i n g pen ^ Faci l i ty Pit Or P-t

E a r t n e nManure Basi

Pump

"emporary Manure W a t c r t i g n t Liqmd Manure S u b s u r f a c e W a s t e Pond or Land Manure S to rage Basinitack or Plat'of"n Manure Tank or Pressure Gasoline or Disposal Unit

Basm Pipe :Oii Tank (Soeci 'y Type)

Otner (Descr ibe)Concre te Floor OnlyConcrete Floor andPa'tiai Concrete wal ls

. Well is intended to supply water for: i • f r\ "

5. DRILLHOLEDij. (in.) l-'rom ( t t . ) iTo (ft.) Dia. (in.)

10 Surface '«}0 (»

ITOIII ( f t . ) To ( f t . )

2>o ic7

7. CASING, LINER, CURBING AND SCREENMaterial, weight. Specification

Dia. (in.) Mfg. & Method of Assembly l-'rom (f t .) To (ft.)

\& v?iii<j< "T ^J^M^ P>t-K|CjHS* a 2gy

u^ A5rM/v^\CLL«^ ^CJ '

Surface ^3 /

'

:. GROUT OR OTHER SEALING MATERIALKind' From- (ft.) To (ft.)

r .

CLXJU/M AJu+*j**4

-' If

I

Surface |

i lo11. MISCELLANEOUS DATA

Yield Test: ————— 3 ——————— Hrs. at ^^ GPM

Depth from surface lo normal water level \O [ Ft.

Depth of water level o j_f .when pumping 0 " _ Ft. Stabilized $ Yes CD No

9. FORMATIONSKind

^v,

N iv} ' J} ••^*4~i *•> ^

1) •'

From ( f t . ) To (ft.)

Surface /

K 1 10^7

1

f f

/ ) 1

10. TYPE OF DRILLING MACHINE US!, Rotary-n

•—I . — , w/drillinsPS CaBle Tool ; 1 — 1 mud & ai

. — . Rotary-air , —— , Rotary-h1 _ 1 w/dnihng mud i 1 _ 1 & air

. — . Rotary-w/dri l l inq !, —— ,1 _ I mud M — 1 Reverse F

Well construction completed on \J-L JkJ

)/ ^Well is terminated ——— — * ——— inches

Well disinfected upon completion

Well sealed watertight upon completion

Water sample sent to tiX*-C Oo&JAJl. laboratory on \A^>

:Djmmer

r i 1 1 Jett ing with

ammer i j ] Air

I [~j Water

Notary i

L 03 I9d>V3d above

final gradeI _ 1 below

{$. Yes CH No

EX Yes CU No

L3U l.llr',

finishing the well, amount of cement used in grouting, blasting, etc., should be given on reverse side.

A/go.

> - i - .. -:-v •

SMIC ;>| WiscDP'.iD e p . i r l m e n t < > t Nauu. i l

Uo \ 7 9 2 1M:idi ion , \ V i s L i n s i n

NOTE:W h i l e Cupv D i v i s i o n s C upyO i r e c n Cnpy I Jn l l e r \ CopyYel low Cop> O w n e r ' s Copy

W L L L f OSSTRUTOR'S RHPORT

COUNTY CHhC'K ( . / ( O N E .^V Town________ : Village CD e «Y_

Station Section

LOCATIONTownship Ran

OR - Grid or S t r ee t No. .Street Name

__ __"f^LUoc^t^: subdivisio:'. n a m e , lot i bloJf-SoAND - I f a v a i l a b l e '

3. NAMF. ® OWNER_IAGENT AT TIME OF DRILLING CHECK I /) ONE

ATmRHSS

K-t, \POST OFFICF.

C^ - - . - v ro4. Distance in feet from well; Bunding s a n ' i a r y 3-a<). O'am Sanr.ary Bidg. Sewer

\ ,~ C.I. Otner

Flftor DramConnected To:

c t r rS t c rto nearest: (Reco rdanswer in appropr ia teBlock)

C. . Other C . f . Sewer Other Sewer C . I .

g. Drain S t c r m B'Clg. Sewer

Otne- C. i Other

Street Sewer Other Sewers ^Foundation Drain Connected to$ Sewage Sump _ Clearwater Sept ic | Holding Sewage A bSQf pnon unitd ! Seepage PitSan. I Storm C.I. ' Other Sewer I Sewage

• Sump! C . I . ; Other

ClearwaterOr.

jCTea rwa te r . Seepage Bed_Seepage T rench

P r i v y ; Pet ' P i t : Noncontorm.ng Ex isting Subsur face Pumoroom Barn Animal Animal Silo Glass Lined Sno Ear then Si Was te ; -——— :——————————————„._____,__ _ _—_..__——Gutter Barn Yard With Pit. s torage w/o S to rage Ti

Pit I Well Nonconf orm.ng Exist ing| Pumpi Tank

Pen Faci l i ty ' Pit Pit

lageench Or

Temporary I watertight , Solid Manure Subsurface ! Waste Pond or Land Other (G iv« Description)Manure j Liquid Manure Storage Gasoline or Disposal Unit

I Tank S t r u c t u r e Oi l Tank (Specify Type)

5. Well is intended to supply water for: . . . .

6. DRILLDia. (in.)

10

7. CASIN

Dia. (in.)

u

HOLEFrom (t t . ) To ( f t . ) Dia. (in.)

Surface ' -3 0 U>

G, LINER, CURBING AND SCREE!Material , Weight, Specification& Method of Assembly

T4CL We-uo ^vL£^ "fl

.a20 WteAl \ q , M (LJicDiS- P^Q(2-

8. GROUT OR OTHER SEALING MATERIAKind

Necx-h Pressure

From (f t . ) To (f t . )

as ; no1

SI

From (f t . ) To (ft.)

Surface C^/O

^/FT

LFrom (ft.) : To (ft.)

Surface ^

PorHand- (5 §>orJ<<,11 . Ml

De

SCELLANEOUS DATA .•If! Tfif ' His. at X. Q GPM

pth from surface to normal water level CJD Ft.Depth of water level r—o

when pumping £>.Z. Ft. Stabilized KJ Yes CH No

9. FORMATIONSKind ' From ( f t . ) ' To ( f t . )

j

'OCiYl^ H* C_/ \Cl\l Surface (^3

^nnrl &t-nne IP 70

1

^ • : . ^r :^ _

;

10. TYPE OF DRILLING MACHINE USEDRotary-hammer

_ . — . w/dr i l l ing F — iEj Cable Tool 11 _ J mud & air 1 — 1 J e t t i n g w i t hi±j( Rotary-»lr i . — . R o t a r y - h a m m e r 1 I AirGB jM,Ki'illin| mm* 1 _ 1 & air i=" " 1 1 Wate r

. —— | R o t j r y - w / d r i l l i n g . — .1 _ 1 mud 1 _ 1 Reverse R o t a r y

Well construction completed on xJCLjTOlOgjr Q*0 19 'O, _ J2S above

//O — i fi"1' gradeWell is terminated —— LW1 —— inches 1 — 1 below

Well disinfected upon completion 59 Yes CJ No

Well sealed watertight upon completion IS Yes CD No

i f.it'71 MT ) ( ( l*,3 *~1f>Water sample sent to gq ^ C Id IrC- 0, vk) C±\J , CfeftT ^ * laboratory on M ~ \Q 19 '"J

Your opinion concerning other pollution hazards, information concerning difficulties encountered, and data relating to nearby wells, screens, seals, method offinishing the well, amount of c«nent used in grouting, blasting, etc., should be given on reverse side. f^t__ •

:^^^^. I ^S. » f "* ^ "••-• \f(f | " ^ ' ' ' •*"

"''^oiMS^Mm,^J^, Complete Mail Address ^33 Qljon Drive* """Eou Claire, V/k 54701

\

o -72

ft

OT

'//

/'. T

.d

Vff

S i j l e . • ! W i s c i i M s i nl)ep.ulmenl "I N a t u r a l Ri> MI

Bn\ -150Madison. Wisconsin S.~>7M

\ \ lu te ( \ i p > D i v i s i o n ' s C ' ' - : v .Green Copy D r i l l e r ' s CopyYellosv Copy Owner 's Ooiv.

W t L L C O N S T R I C T O R ' S REPORTl - o r i n ,'3'J'i 15R e v . l f l - 7 5

1. COUNTY,-, C H K C K i ^3 Town

NameVili ' C"V ^

'/rSextion Section [Township Range

LOCATION S£ '/.j 5f M <3 ___£&n __y..OR - Gr id or Street No. / S l r e e t Nameso if iAND - It available subdivision name, lot & block No

3 NAMts. ^ OWNER|IjAG_ENT AT TIME OF DRILLING CHECK (7) ONE

A2_A H D R I i S S

)ST on in-J)ST or^

Lrrf________

* Distance in feet from wellto nearest: (Recordanswer in appropriateblock)

Sani tary Bldg. Drain San i ta ry Bldg. Sewer ComTecte'cf'To ' S!orm Bldg. Drain ; Storm Bldg. Sewer

Other C.I . Other "~"C.I. C.I. Sewer Other Sewer C.I. C.I. i Other

Street Sewer ! Other Sewers Founaalion Drain Connected toj Sewage Sump : C learwater Septic i Holding [Sewage Adsorp t ion Unit~ """CT——! Other——\ Sump Tank Tank rSeeoagep,j—————————~

Storm C.I.Other Sewer I Sewage C________[ — ;Sump____~ ;

Clearwater ~ ( j i ea rwa te r t — ^ — , —______Dr._____ Sump___•____________

— I Seepage BeetSeepage T rench

Pet Pit: Nonconforrrung Existing | Subsurface Pumproom____ Barn Animal An ima l Silo G lass Lined I S ilo i Earthen Silage

PitPump

Nonconforming Existing ^Gutter Barn , Yard With Pit, Pen

Tank

Storage | w/o Storage Trench OrFaci l i ty ; Pit Pii

Temporary watertight , Solid Manure , Subsurface wast* Pond or Land .Other (G ive Descript ion)Manure Liquid Manure Storage Gasoline or ; Disposal Unit ;

Stack Tank St ruc ture Oil Tank | (Specify Type) !

j. Well is intended to supply water

i. DRILLDia. (in.)

/*

1. CASINDia. (in.)

^

"I*1

4•n

HOLEFrom ( t t . ) ITo ( f t . )

Surface o< C1

i

for: .^yf~*-^~^m^t^

Dia. (in.)

4

G. LINER, CURBING AND SCREEJMaterial, weight, SpecificationA. Method of Assembly

J£*^ ~J

t^i/J^A /*X0 u^Uf A

<£(?.

l^SjL

S*^J^A?n,Jzt

8. GROUT OR OTHER SEALING MATERIAKind

££ y ^^ ,^ r

From (f t . ) I To (ft.)

J?^ 7o2_

>J

From (ft.) To (ft.)

Surface

•*./*

?55' JLJ.L\

LFrom (ft.)

Surface

37

+0

To (ft.)

'•^a1 1 . MISCELLANEOUS DATA

Vield Test: —————— > J Hrs. at ——— / <?*~r GPM

Depth from surface to normal water level .3 / Ft.

Depth of water level j / /•>when pumping ^ ^ Ft. Stabilized B Yet D No

9. FORMATIONSKind F

& &*L*^ j[> s'/

J^^A Q. _Vw j

SJ^-Ssf x2X_*-Zrf/t ^ ^-f-£, •. <?

t^< J^^tl) /^d.1-L^L A st-f.^.

rom (ft.) To (ft.)

urface /

/ Z7

# 3#

<=3£ 3&o ^ ! J')

i

-T.' "/

10. TYPE OF DRILLING MACHINE USEDi Rotary-hammer

i — i w /d r i l l i n jKJ Cable Tool I — I mud * airi — , Ro ta ry -a i r . — , Rotary-hammerI _ I w /d r i l l ing mud I — I & air

. — | Ro ta ry -w/d r i l l i ng . —— .I _ I mud I — I Reverse R o t a r y

[ZH Je t t ing w i t h

ED Air

r~l Water

Well construction completed on (^J'^^t.J iT 19 y £-.Q^ above

Well is terminated ———— '& inches d) below

Well disinfected upon completion 53 Yes D No

Well sealed watertight upon completion 52 Yes O No

Water sample sent to laboratory onYour opinion concerning other pollution hazards, information concerning difficulties encountered, and data relating to nearby wells, screens, seals, method offinishing the well, amount of cement used in grouting, blasting, etc., should be given on reverse side.

Signature

Registered Well Driller

Complete Mail Address

September 15, 1989

Short, Elliot & Hendrickson421 Frehette Drive S£p ]Chippewa Falls, WI 54729

Attn: Bill McKinley ^ , !

Re: Hallie Project

Bill, please find enclosed the VOC results for the samplesreceived September 1, 1989. EPA Method 502.2 was used tocomplete the analyses.

There were no detects in any of your samples.

If you have any questions, please call.

Sincerely,

ENVIROSCAN, INC.

- -< '/ -- ~VJudy A. LewandowskiSenior Instrumentation Technician

JAL/ls

.V)3 West MihuiA Road Rothschi ld . WI 54474 ( 7 1 5 ) .

r. JALYTICAL REPORT

FOR:

Short, Elliot & Hendrickson421 Frehette DriveChippewa Falls, WI 54729

Attn: Bill McKinley

Benzene 0.2Bromoform 2.0Bromomethane 4.0Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5Chlorobenzene 2.0Chloroethane 2.02-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 5.0Chloroform 0.5Chloromethane 2.0Dibromochloromethane 0.51.2-Dichlorobenzene 1.01.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.01.4-Dichlorobenzene 0.5Dichlorobromomethane 0.51.1-Dichloroethane 0.51.2-Dichloroethane 0.51.1-Dichloroethylene 1.01.2-Dichloroethylene 1.0Dichloromethane 1.01,2-Dichloropropane 0.5Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5Ethylbenzene 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0Tetrachloroethylene 0.5Toluene 0.51.1.1-Trichloroethane 0.51.1.2-Trichloroethane 0.5Trichloroethylene 0.2Vinyl Chloride 0.2Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0Dichlorodifluoromethane • 2.0m & p-Xylene (as m-Xylene) 1.0o-Xylene 1.0

Analytical No.

X = Analyzed but not detected

WISCONSIN LAB CERTIFICATION NO 737053130

P.O. #. Project Hallie

VOC Analys is (ug/1)

DetectionL i m i t HA1

SAMPLED BY: _DATEREC'D:_REPORT DATE:_APPROVED BY:

Client

21707

HA2

9/1/899 / 1 S / B 9

HA3

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

- XXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

21708 21709

14

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

21710

All analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Enviroscan Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.

.ALYTICAL REPORT

FOR:

Short, Elliot & Hendrickson421 Frehette DriveChippewa Falls, WI 54729

Attn: Bill McKinley

WISCONSIN LAB CERTIFICATION NO 737063130

P.O. #: Project HallieSAMPLED BY.OATEREC'D:_

Client9-1-89

REPORT DATE: 9-15-89APPROVED BY:

VOC Analysis (ug/1)

DetectionLimit

Benzene 0.2Bromoform 2.0Bromomethane 4.0Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5Chlorobenzene 2.0Chloroethane 2.02-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 5.0Chloroform 0.5Chloromethane 2.0Dibromochloromethane 0.51.2-Dichlorobenzene 1.01.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.01.4-Dichlorobenzene 0.5Dichlorobromomethane 0.51.1-Dichloroethane 0.51.2-Dichloroethane 0.51.1-Dichloroethylene 1.01.2-Dichloroethylene 1.0Dichloromethane 1.01,2-Dichloropropane 0.5cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5Ethylbenzene 1.01,1, 2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0Tetrachloroethylene 0.5Toluene 0.51.1.1-Trichloroethane 0.51.1.2-Trichloroethane 0.5Trichloroethylene 0.2Vinyl Chloride 0.2Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.0m & p-Xylene (as m-Xylene) 1.0o-Xylene 1.0

Analytical No.

X = Analyzed but not detected

HAS

21711

HA6 HA7

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

21712 21713

All analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Enviroscan Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.

COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY, INC.514 Main Street, P.O. Box 526Colfax, Wisconsin 54730715-962-3121800-962-5227

SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON

421 FRENETTE DRIVECHIPPEWA FALLS, UI 54729

REPORT NO.: 33485/01REPORT DATE: 9/07/99

DATE RECEIVED: 8/31/99PAGE 1

UI DNR LAB CERTIF.W17013980GU949 GU950Uell HA-01 Well HA-02

GW951Well HA-C3

DateAnalyzed

Chloride, *9/LHardness EDTA, «g/LNitrate-Nitrogen, *g/LPHT.Dis.Solids, nq/1Dissolved Iron, mq/LDis. rtanganese,ug/LFecal Col . , */100*l

9391.14.9

955.5

55< 1

5242.14.9

77< 0.1

< 20< 1

101.05.0

51< 0.1

< 20< 1

9-01-899-07-899-01-899-01-897-05-899-07-899-07-899-01-89

Chloride, •g/LHardness EDTA, «j/LNitrate-Nitrogen, *9/LPHT.Dis.Sol ids, «9/LDissolved Iron, »9/LDis. Man9awse,U9/LFecal Col i , «/100«l

6W952Well HA-04

5291.44.9

67< 0.125

< 1

GU953 ,Well HA-05

GU954Uell HA-06

9263.04,9

98< 0.1

< 20< 1

2101.04.7

55< 0.1

< 20< 1

DateAnalyzed

9-01-899-07-899-01-899-01-899-05-899-07-899-07-899-01-89

< HMDS "LESS THAN" Detectable Level Approved by

PROFESSIONAL LABORATORY SERVICES SINCE 1952,9.

COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY, INC.514 Main Street, P.O. Box 526Colfax, Wisconsin 54730715-962-3121800 - 962 • 5227

SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON

421 FRENETIC DRIVECHIPPEUA FALLS, UI 54729

REPORT NO.! 33485/01REPORT DATE: 9/07/99

DATE RECEIVED: 8/31/99PAGE 2

GU955UeU HA-07

Chloridei <tg/LHardness EDTA,Nitrate-Nitrogen, ng/LPHT.Dis.Solids, fig/LDissolved Iron, «q/LDis. Manganese,ug/LFecal Co l i , t/100«l

2210.65.1

60< 0.1

< 20< 1

DateAnalyzed

9-01-999-07-999-01-999-01-899-05-899-07-899-07-899-01-89

arrived in lab at 1530 p» on 8/30/89 and Merefield filtered by Bill HcKinley of Short, Elliott, &Hendrickson.

are not filtered for pH or Conductivity.

< Heans "LESS THAN" Detectable Level Approved by:

PROFESSIONAL LABORATORY SERVICES SINCE 1952

514 ._.n i>Col fax , WI

TtST I M ' ' LA>" IU*IOKV

_ - _ t - 0. D*I54730 962-3121

Parameter and Units

Alkalinity as CaCO-j. mg/L

Ammonia (as N), mg/L

BOD, five-day, mg/L

Chloride , mg/L

COD , mg/L

Fluoride, mg/L

Kjeldahl Nitrogen (as N)mg/L

Nitrate2 (as N), mg/L

Nitrate+Nitrite (as N),mg/L

Nitrite2 (as N), mg/L

GROUND WATER TEST PROCEDURES 1

Method

Electrometlc Titiration(to pH 4 .5)

Colorimetric, Automated,Lachat

Electrode

Colorimetric, AutomatedFerricyanide

Colorimetric, Manual

Specific Ion Electrode

Hardness as CaCO., mg/L EDTA Titration

Colorimetric, Semi-AutomatedBlock Digester

Cadmium Reduction, Color-imetric, Automated

Cadmium Reduction, Color-imetric, Automated

Colorimetric

Reference

EPA, 1983 . p. 310.1

EPA, 1983 , p. 350.1

Standard Methods , p. 525

EPA, 1983 , p. 325.2

EPA, 1983 , p. 410.4

Standard Methods , p. 210

Standard Method , p. 210

EPA, 19836, p. 351.2

EPA, 1983 , p. 353.2

EPA, 1983 , p. 353.2

EPA, 1983 , p. 353.3

Equipment

- Orion Specific Ion Meter -Model 407A

- pll Combination Electrodewith Calomel Reference

- Lachat Auto Analyzer'1000

- Yellow Springs InstrumentModel 54 Oxygen Meter

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

Bausch & Lomb Spectrophoto-meter - Spectronic 21

Orion Specific Ion MeterModel 407AOrion Fluoride ElectrodeModel 94-09

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

Bausch & Lomb Spectrophoto-meter - Spectronic 21

•"" p up

(Cont inued)

Parameter and U n i t s2

Organic Nitrogen (as N)»g/L

PH

Phenols, mg/L

Method

Kjeldahl-Nitrogen minusAmmonia Nitrogen

Electrometric

Distillation followed byColorimetric; Automated

Reference

Standard Methods , p. 406

Standard Methods , p. 423

EPA, 1983 , p. 420.2

Equipment

- Orion Specific Ion Meter -Model 407ApH Combination Electrode

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

Phosphorus, Total (as P)mg/L

Specific Conductance(micromhos per centimeterat 25° C)

2Sulfate (as SO ), mg/L

Solids, Total, mg/L

Solids, Total Dissolved ,mg/L

Solids, Total Suspended,mg/L

Metals

Cadmium, Total, ug/L

Calcium, Total, ug/L

Chromium, Total, u

Copper, Total, ug/L

Persulfate digestion; Automated Standard Methods , p. 448Colorlmetric Ascorbic Acidreduction

Conductivity Meter

Turbidiiretric

Gravimetric, 103 to 105° C

Filtration, .45 urn filter,180° C

Glass fiber filtration,103 to 105° C

Digestion followed by atomicabsorption for all totalmetals listed.

Standard Methods , p. 76

EPA, 1983 , 375.4

Standard Methods , p. 93

Standard Methods , p. 95

Standard Methods , p. 96

EPA, 1983 , Section 200.0

Bausch & Lomb Spectrophoto-meter - Spectronic 21

Horizon Ecology Co. -Type 1484 Conductivity Meter

- Lachat Auto Analyzer 1000

Geo-Tech back flushingfilter apparatus with aGeo-Tech Peristaltic Pump

Millipore manifold filtrationapparatus with Buchnar fil-ters

Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorp-tion - Model 2380

(Continued)

Parameter and Units4

Metals (Continued)

Iron, Total, mg/LMagnesium, Total, ug/L

Manganese, Total, ug/LNickel, Total, ug/L

Potassium, Total, ug/L

Sodium, Total, ug/LZinc, Total, ug/L

Lead, ug/L

Hexavalent Chromium, ug/L

1

Method3

Digestion followed by atomicabsorption for all totalmetals listed.

Reference

EPA, 1983 , Section 200.0

Colorimetric Standard Methods , p. 201

Equipment

- Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorp-tion - Model 2380

- Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorp-tion - Model 2380 GraphiteFurnace

- Bausch & Lomb Spectrophoto-meter - Spectronic 21

Recommendation for sampling and preservation of samples according to parameters measured found in "Methods for ChemicalAnalysis of Water and Wastes, 1983" U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Table 1, pp. xvi-xix.

Samples are filtered through a 0.45 micron (urn) filter before being analyzed. A Geo-Tech back flushing filter apparatuswith a Geo-Tech peristaltic pump (102mm-4" diameter filters) is used for filtration. Samples which require preservationare preserved following filtration.

For the determination of total metals sample is not filtered before processing.^Dissolved metals are defined as those constituents which will pass through a 0.45 micron filter. The sample is filteredthrough a 0.45 micron filter with the Geo-Tech back flushing filter apparatus and then acidified with 1 ml of 1:1 HNO_(to a pH of 2) per 250 ml. of filtrate to preserve sample.

Reference: "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water", 16th Edition, 1985.

Reference: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, 1983", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office ofTechnology Transfer.

APPENDIX B

STOP 1I R V I N PARK OUTCROP

. , R . 8W .

East

MT. SIMON FM.

MT. SIMON FM

ScaleIn Feet80 1

V*ry «O*TM to fine-grained. Thlok-b*dd*d.

GO -CoarM to f ln»-gr»ln*d.

SOB* l«n««» and thin b*d*of Mndlton*.

Fin* to r*ry oooj-»»-gr»in»d.T»ry fin* to oo»r«»-gr»ln»d. Slltyabundant tr»ll oarklng*. 40 -

Terr OOATM to •«dlui-gr»ln«d> llttl*fin*. Thlok-b*dd»d. Ptbbl* qiartt.

30

. P*bbl*(V«py oo*rM to. ThlDk-boddod.

CO*TM to fln«-jr«ln«d, llttl*P*bbl«i loeclly. TMok-b«dd»d.

ooarM. 20.

7«ry OOM*M to Mdlu>. Ptbblo qimrts.Thl«k bod.

i» «nd fino-cr%ln»d, llttl*no*r top. Thlok-boddtd.

Tory oo«r«o to m»di\m, llttl* fin*.Sllty, P«bbl«i

10-

gr«nit*, partially alt*r*dto ol*y In upp*r 3'.

0.

f>«»«rlt*d by K.E. Ortroa (1868)

(WGNHS, 1970, P.46)

JL62* covered to base

of Upper level

STOP 2MT. SIMON OUTCROP

.Lower LevelSWj,SWj,Sec.8,T27N.,R.9W. Terrace level

parking area

MT. SIMON FM.

South

C**rM-gr«ln*d. C**r*«rt grain*,aeneontimtod tlong boddlng plan**.

Pin* to Tory

CtrlScale

In Feet•o-

Mtdlta and ooarM-gr*ln*d.Htdlui and ooarM-grmlnfd.

Pin* and ••dlxa-graln*d. Pitted t\rfao*.T*ry *oaj-*o to

Pln*r-gr*>ln*d Infin*. ThUk-boddod.

l 1 foot.

fin* to r*ry aoar**-graln*d.TM*k-b*dd»d.

CoarM to rin*-graln*d. Ihiek-boddod.

CoarM to fln*-graln*d.M*dlui to T«ry fln*-gralnod.

R»f«r U STOP 1 f or k»y to

70.

eo_

50.

Coar** to fln*-graln*d,llttlo -rtrr o*ar*o.TMek-boddod.

30-

Pin* to Y*ry aoar*o. Thlek-boddod.Htdiui to T«ry f ln«.

. Thlok-b*dd*d.Pin* to Ttry

Ntdlui t* v*rr *o*j-i«-gr»ln«d. Color b*nd*d.Thl.k-boddod.

10-

M*dl«a to . Thlek-b*dd*d.

0 J

Rerlson-ua to v*rtl*al •o«l* appra. 1 tS

D*«*rlb*4 *y H. I. Ortroa And T. irth*n*,•»dlfl*d fr«B Ortroa (1990).

(WGNHS, 1970, P.50)

STOP 2MT. SIMON OUTCROP

Upper LevelSWj,SWj,Sec.8,T.27N.,R.9W.

MT. SIMON FM.N o r t h

CoarM-graln*d. Thlok-b*dd*d. Obelu* naaoma au*»un. Th*Mrook* v»r« a*«lgn«d to th* t»u Clair* Tm. by Twonhof*!•t al (1935, p.453).

Htdlxa and fln*-graln*d with MM ooarM, • •arMrtoward top.

Fin* and r*ry f lnt-gr«ln«d.Fin* and •*dlui-gi«ln*d. Thlolc-b*dd*d.flnt Mid T»ry fin»-gr«ln»d. Thlok-b«dd«d.V»r7 fln«-(r»ln*d with *hlt» br«ohl«pod frfcg«»nti.Co*r**--gr«ln«d with llttl* T«py aoarM and ••diva

nn«-gr»ln»d, filtj.

Sca leIn Feet

1

220 1

CoarM-gr«ln*d, with llttl* r*ry eoarM. Thlek-b*dd*d.

to T*ry fln*-graln*d. Sllty.CoarM-gi«ln*d with llttl* v*ry ooart*. Thlek-b*dUaonll*, rlppl* Bark* and gray Bottling at top.

210 -

to T*ry fln*-gr*ln»d,

Fln»-graln*d, illty.

Coar«* t« T«ry fin*. Sllty.Thl«k-b*dd*d.

200 -

190

CoarM-gr«ln*d with llttl* Bedimand fin*. SOB* trail

190 -

Coar**-graln*d. Thlok-b*dd*d. Uaathor* toIrregular b*d>.

170 -

92' aoT*r«d to top of l«w*r l*r*l.180 -

150 -I

Horizontal to T*rti*al foal* apprez. liS

R*f*r t* STOP 1 for key to D**orlt»d by N. C. Oftrtu A T. Artnana,•odlflod froa Ovtroa (19M).

(WGNHS, 1970, F.51)

APPEJVDIX C

Table 1. Selected Input Parameters To The TheisEquation For The Town Of Hallie.

Q = Pumping Rate of Well

K = Hydraulic Conductivity

T = Transmissivity

S = Storativity

t = time

1. 100,000 gallons per day2. 300,000 gallons per day3. 500,000 gallons per day

Range of values from-5 -3

10 to 10 ft/sec

Range of values from 581 gpd/ft to135,668 gpd/ft

0.10 for sandstone and 0.25 forglacial drift

1 . Three days2. 30 days3 . 365 days

Table 2. Drawdowns In Feet For One Well For ThreeDays of Pumping in Cambrian Sandstone.

Q = GALLONS PER DAY (Gallons Per Minute

*Kft/sec

bft

(-1 Standard10E-5 90

10E-5 100

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4**

(Mean K)1 . 3xlOE-4

40

50

60

70

80

90

70

2.0xlOE-4 70

(+1 Standard2.7xlOE-4 70

3.0xlOE-4

4xlOE-4

10E-3

70

70

40

* tT

gpd/ft

Deviat ion581

646

2,584

3,230

3,876

4,522

5, 168

5,814

5,879

9,045

Deviation12,210

13,567

18,089

25,841

100,000(69)

for K)117

***106

31

25

21

19

16

15

15

9

for K)8

7

5

4

300,000(208)

500,000(347 )

Unacceptable drawdowns,greater than 67% ofaquifer thickness

93

76

64

56

50

45

44

30

23

21

16

11

83

74

74

50

38

34

26

19

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thickness ofaquifer, and T equals transmissivity.

** Mean hydraulic conductivity for sandstone wells in sections24 and 25, T28N, R9W and sections 19 and 30, T28N, R8W is1.3xlOE-4 ft/sec + 1.4xlOE-4 ft/sec.

*** Calculations of drawdown are based on the Theis equation withstorativity equal to 0.10 and no recharge.

Table 3. Drawdowns In Feet For One Well For ThirtyDays of Pumping in Cambrian Sandstone.

Q = GALLONS PER DAY (Gallons Per Minute

*Kft/sec

bft

(-1 Standard10E-5

10E-5

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4**

(MEAN K)1 ,3xlOE-4

2.0xlOE-4

90

100

40

50

60

70

80

90

70

70

( +1 Standard2.7xlOE-4 70

3.0xlOE-4

4xlOE-4

5xlOE-4

10E-3

70

70

70

40

* *T

gpd/ft

Deviation581

646

2,584

3,230

3,876

4,522

5, 168

5,814

5,879

9,045

Deviation12,210

13, 567

18,089

22,611

25,841

100,000 300,000 500,000(69) ( 208 ) ( 347 )

for K)148

** *134

Unacceptable drawdowns,38 greater than 67% of

31

26

23

20

18

17

78

68

60

54 90

53 89

12 36 60

for K)9 27 45

8 25 41

6 19 31

5 15 26

5 14 23

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thickness ofaquifer, and T equals transmissivity.

** Mean hydraulic conductivity for sandstone wells in sections24 and 25, T28N, R9W and sections 19 and 30, T28N, R8W is

/.3xlOE-4 ft/sec +. 1.4xlOE-4 ft/sec.

*** Calculations of drawdowns are based on the Theis equation withstorativity equal to 0.10 and no recharge.

Table 4. Drawdowns In Feet For One Well For 365Days of Pumping in Cambrian Sandstone.

Q = GALLONS PER DAY (Gallons Per Minute

*Kft/sec

* *

100,000(69)

300,000(208)

500 ,000( 347 )

b Tft

(-1 Standard10E-5

10E-5

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4*

(Mean K)1 .3xlOE-4

2.0xlOE-4

90

100

40

50

60

70

80

90*

70

70

(+1 Standard2-. 7xlOE-4

3.0xlOE-4

4xlOE-4

5xlOE-4

10E-3

70

70

70

70

40

gpd/ft

Dev iat ion581

646

2,584

3,230

3,876

4,522

5, 168

5,814

5,879

9,045

Deviation12,210

13,567

18,089

22,611

25,841

for K)182

***165

45

37

31

27

24

21

21

14

for K)11

10

7

6

5

Unacceptablegreater than

drawdowns ,67% of

aquifer thickness

64

43

32

29

22

18

16

106

71

53

49

37

29

26

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thickness ofaquifer, and T equals transmissivity.

** Mean hydraulic conductivity for sandstone wells in sections24 and 25, T28N, R9W and sections 19 and 30, T28N, R8W is1.3xlOE-4 ft/sec ± 1.4xlOE-4 ft/sec.

*** Calculations of drawdowns are based on the Theis equation withstorativity equal to 0.10 and no recharge.

Table 5. Drawdowns In Feet For Two Wells 800 Feet ApartIn The Cambrian Sandstone After 30 Days Of Pumping. EachWell Is Pumped At The Same Rate.

Q = Combined Pumpage For Both Wells in Gallons Per Day(Gallons Per Minute)

100,000(69)

* * *K b Tft/sec ft gpd/ft

(-1 Standard Deviation f-.jr Hi

300,000(208)

500,000(347 )

10E-5

10E-5

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-4

10E-3

90

100

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

40

2

3

3

4

5

5

6

25

581

646

,584

,230

,876

,522

, 168

,814

,460

,841

7

6

1

4* *

7

9

16

1

1

1

3

2

0

9

8

7

Unacceptable drawdowns ,greater than 67% of

aquifer thickness

57

47

40

35

31

28

25

i

67

58

52

46

42

12

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thicknessof aquifer, and T equals transmissivity. Mean K for sandstonewells in sections 24 and 25, T28N, R9W and sections 19 and 30,T28N, R9W is 1.3xlOE-4 ft/sec + 1.4xlOE-4 ft/sec.

** Calculations of drawdowns are based on the Theis equation withstorativity equal to 0.10 and no recharge. At 800-feet forwell separation, the drawdowns for two wells are approximatelyone-half the drawdown for one well.

Table 6. Drawdowns In Feet For One Well For 30Days of Pumping in Glacial Drift.

Kft/sec

bft

Tgpd/ft

Q = GALLONS PER DAY (Gallons Per Minute

100,000(69)

(-1 Standard Deviation for K)1.5xlOE-4 70 6,783

**(Mean K)1.6xlOE-3 70 72,356

(+1 Standard Deviation for K)3xlOE-3 70 135,668

** *L4

300,000(208)

500,000(347 )

Unacceptable drawdowns,greater than 67% ofaquifer thickness

44

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thickness ofaquifer, and T equals transmissivity.

** Mean hydraulic conductivity for glacial wells in sections24 and 25, T28N, R9W is 1.6xlOE-3 ft/sec +. 1.4xlOE-3 ft/sec.

*** Calculations of drawdown are based on the Theis Equation withstorativity equal to 0.25 and no recharge.

Table 7. Drawdowns In Feet For One Well For 365Days of Pumping in Glacial Drift.

Kft/sec

bft

Tgpd/ft

(-1 Standard Deviation for K)1.5xlOE-4 70 6,783

**(Mean K)1.6xlOE-3 70 72,356

I+1 Standard Deviation for K)3xlOE-3 70 135,668

= GALLONS PER DAY (Gallons Per Minute

100,000(69)

***17'

300,000( 208)

500,000( 347)

Unacceptable drawdowns,greater than 67% ofaquifer thickness

52 87

* K equals hydraulic conductivity, b equals saturated thickness ofaquifer, and T equals transmissivity.

** Mean hydraulic conductivity for glacial wells in sections 24and 25, T28N, R9W is 1.6xlOE-3 ft/sec ± 1.4xlOE-3 ft/sec.

*** Calculations of drawdown are based on the Theis Equation withstorativity equal to 0.25 and no recharge.

APPENDIX 1. V.iluc". of the function W/ti) for v.irious vjlucb of u

u W(u)

1 x 10 '" 22 .452 21 .763 21 354 21.065 20.84(. 20.667 20.508 20.37') 20.251 x 10 '' 20.152 19.451 19.054 10.76rj 18.54(. 18.357 18.208 18.079 17. 951 >: 10 " 17.842 1 7 . 1 53 16.744 16.465 16.236 16.05

u W(u)

7 x 10"" 15.908 15 .769 15.651 x 10"7 15 .542 14.853 14 444 1 4 . 1 55 13.936 13.757 1 3 6 08 13.469 1 3 3 41 x 10" 1.3.242 1 2 . 5 53 1 2 . 1 44 .855 .636 .457 .298 .169 .041 x 10~' 10.942 10.243 9.84

u W(u)

4 x IO" '1 9 .555 9336 9.147 8 998 8.869 8.74i ». in ' M. u;2 7.943 7.534 7 .255 7.026 6.847 6.698 6.559 6.441 x 10"' 6.332 5 643 5 .234 4.955 4 .736 4.547 4.398 4.269 4 . 14

u Wlui

1 x 10 J 4.042 1 !53 2.964 2.685 2 476 2 . 3 07 2 . 1 58 2.039 1 921 x 10 ' 1 . 8232 1 . 2 2 33 0.9064 0.7025 05606 0.4547 0.3748 0.3119 0.2601 x 10" 0.2192 00493 0.0134 0.0045 0.001

' Ad.iplrH from I K. Wrrm-l, MrlfaxA lor (Vfrrmininn /Vrmr.iMifv of VV.ifrr-ttr.im>); M.itcn.i/s iviihr In f >m /t.ir«Ki^ Wr/l Mi-frVtrfv U.S. Ciiiilopt at Sunvv Wjlur-Suwly I'.ipcr H«7, I'MJ.

(Fetter, 1988, p.550)

S i . 1 : > • .!.' W i s c o n s i n! ' j pa r tmenL ci Na tu ra l Kes

I ' U B M C W E L L SITE S U R V E YForm 3300-74 4-86

W a t e r w o r k s WeU Number

\-Site Dimensions

St.-i.ol « Rou te

C i t y , t'.ate. Zip Code

Ma] u f Site A v a i l a b l e

I Genera l Area Descr ip t ion

' LOQfoDtC -—• -vi Zoning A

j Distance to Other WeljsHigh Capac i ty /£. ~ "/i L!__ P r i v a t e

- i A M T A H V H A Z M U 3 S

• ' i . \ - u t o \Vas tc Disposa:

He-fuse Disposal

\o^ AiI U'.-l S'.ora^e

P H Y S I C A I . F E A T U R E STup.^iaphy

Flood I'ott.-ntialK •.£>£=,-& S

Surface Waters

' i ! i O i - C ; : i C I N F O R M A T I O NWell .

A q u i f e r to be Used

, .:rries. Outcrops

}ravel Pits

CornmenLs

Inspected By

J Tl—

f-tr.

Date Inspected

_._JlnJ

APPENDIX C

WELL LOCATION MAPS

DOC ID: 40560PAGE #: 62

UNSCANNABLE IMAGERY INSERT

SUPERFUND DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SDMS)

This document is an unscannable item in SDMS.Please contaci the ERA Region V Superfund Records Center to view this document.

SITE NAME

EPA ID NUMBER

PHASE /ACTIVITY

PRP AFFILIATION

REASON WHYUNSCANNABLE

UNSCANNABLEDESCRIPTION /CONTENT

DATE(S) OFUNSCANNABLE(S)

NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES INC

WDI 0061 961 74

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS

NONE

ILLEGIBLE OR X FORMAT:OVERSIZED

WELL AND RESERVOIR SITE SELECTION

NO DATE

APPENDIX D

BORING LOG FOR TEST WELL

sI

^""1

J)D

1

V?

1

t

•u

5

1

|

c.

8

1

5£IT^

•A<

c

1-*C

^

t

w«

1

t1

O

~

1

O

cJ

*

1

!^J>

1

„

*

oc,

1Jc

J

(t

1k3

o

^

1

o

s

vA3

1

1,0

cc

1

W

*

O

1

tt

§

i

1

itn

8

0

1

53

I\

o*

0

c

1

-•*

i

1cc

S£

1«i3

8j

1

$

?

?

1

I

O

J

1

-

-t

3

1

h

§

£

1

Jn

I

$

1

$CDO

,

«

1

\

c

9

1

J

1

i

\fvc

§Vr*

1j•>

I

j

1

$

a

P

1

I

0

f

1

*

ft

-a

1

t

g

C

1A

n

co

i

I

ici

7

1

o

0

^

1

0>

-t

8

1c

o

r

1_k

3

0

C

^

1

t^

vA

1

\

C

j(

1

-

"j

1

c

15

Inn

^»

?;

1

£

^1

-vo,

T\

o

cfl

I

!T

ot

-J\2

*

c

OS

Ti

~

*^»•<>>5-

1

to

!* O ^

> ^

i ————————————————————— : —— L ______ -. —————— * —— i

""*" JL " " ? -A Qv •?• f 1?0 ?f^\ ^

J * \M y/» J ?§ £ jj £ £o-'' 5

y1 £ ^ J s$ -5» ^ ^ ?? aO -^ ~"""fc ^ •» ^V ^c v / * £~ "* """•. ^ T *-Crh r P^ r ^y'* j » n* ^* _ ^7 }5i ^ 0^ > £• X k)j*A> £ T) S T 3 o %v^ ^-^ijj "^ ypJ^1

H r 2?Ul 4k. -t». ifi CJ N3 KJ f" — * — • rlr'O t»> o cn o cn o v c n o cn«^

| | | | | | 1 ll 1 ill | | ll ill 1 lllllll | | lllll| ill ill ill 1 | ill | i

SAMPLENo.

MOISTURE

E ^KJ nj

gsto

18c zwg

WSAMPLE

RECOVERY

UNIFIEDSOIL

CLASSDRILLINGMETHOD

<(JC>r

3

2

-•imO

C.1(—COCO~T1

oidoz>»

zo;Limr>»•

3;

CO

m

**" 5 c~H '^* T^

rr

i

i 'i

3rn

U

35

fMg>l

*R

! Iok-»

3ri

S

ii

COo>-J

?

i•o

\

^_/

R *> Esirsr-v.$*cJt

£tfryvJ

8 Sc: M•33T\

0mmS<

sDHlj

|A^n*

?v_^

\ p (j^P m c«O TI> O OO — I 31 CDo orn =m TO 5 zo p O p00 i ?^ o P,

iTl

?%i

—

o*

S

0»»

J.

r

0

~~

3r3

'~^^

0r-O0

mm

^ o•

oo

K8,

5 1

(Ocn

1

(Ocn

fihlihlilihl

vA

too

(O

4) §

n0

00cn 00 vj

Cncncn

0) cnCn

-c

Hit ~n

7| i00 too

O

IJilililiLliMiMiM,!CDOfiii iii i [tail

SAMPLENo.

MOISTURE

2a?

SAMPLERECOVERY

UNF1EDSGML

DRILLINGMETHOD

moo

o>zd0

JOm

f

£?

Oo

r

F

u

0)

03 <=•§ *

O o

5

mm

o

FIELD BORING LOG J_ OF.

LL

COMMENT«;. UAujif- "T&zr W*u j / /"1 ~ JOB No. "J^/U

BORING No/ie^ST \N&too /

SAM

PLE

No.

1-((100-

10*3)

It./ioT-l / o }

*l»?>/no-us*)

1H-/U^T"

ll«")

MO

ISTU

RE

Vsi T

V /

GRAIN SIZEANALYSIS

SIEVESIZE*¥-/y^^O/ o^Zot?*^/£>*ft?

IOC3tj>6?**4l&i{U

[OOt r?^ Hto<+o

[00

1*00

&PAS!ING9^°jl.•52,l"Z-i~H

I Of?

^°)(S)1 J"2-.^>«?^U^3"%*j 7

/£*-»<^t?5-71,1i e>

SAM

PLE

RECO

VERY

£»£*&

V/

14"V7

«~,f

•^A

•y-tic.

DRIL

LING

MET

HOD

VISUAL FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

— c^ATyx^TTvXl- j p>n_en'jy —

i r^ v\ ^t r^v^y* j r *'•• )— —

_ -Ac*-' C^*-fT —

— —— —

=-1 1 0 ^ 110-=•w. ^

— w«£ ^J£MVteUifeY^ —— (*<r> OyV i r~i= —

=—11^ /D.I A-« ir > 11^ -^1

—— ——

- E0/3 -— —=-120 120-=— —— —_ —^"" 4 « e < ^ c '——125 125——— —— —

— 130 130 —— —— —— —=-135 135-=— —— —

=-140 140 ——— —^—m

— —

=-145 145 —— —— —— —=-150 150-=l

APPENDIX E

TEST PUMP DRAW DOWN AND RECOVERY DATA

AQUIFER TEST DATA

Owner "Tb>*J»0

Date I '2-/<^%. 1*5

t-<*l-Ue . Counly state

Company perlofming test . Measured by

Well No Distance Irom pump-ng *# NJ AT Type of test . Test No

Measuring equipment.

Time DataPump on Hale' *7 'T Time !5Pumpofl Date LlJiSL Time jjDuration of aquifertest

Pumping 'Z' n<*v Recover1

00 (fo)

Water Level Data

Slate water level "gl

Measuring point j£EL

Peer

Elevation of measuring poiij -.N

Discharge Data

Depth of pump/**** -£H,Previous pumpingTYes—— No-EI

Duration 'Z-/ M&&I End ____

Comments on lactorsaffecting test data

DataClocktime

Tim

eIn

ce p

u•t

artc

dTi

min

ce p

l/f

WaMr

measure-ment C

omct

lon

orCo

nver

sion Water

levelchanget or I'

Dischargemeasure-

ment Ratepipe

0TS

?7? tvo

or05 86 15 *°

U2.,\S aioot

oo7-

PC:

iQ

OT.30

O.VJ03

O3 ocT5

01

7?10

GC400 0.15

O4-0.30

co

Cs.'f.I.'a

CO

o.os 10**

00 Uf.45on "

00 . 1-5

"50 0.20 aT.'

CO OO 0,10IS

(0 (J.OS11 . \o

itOf

15cc4K/.IO 0

(•5OC. -

00

(/(/•ID

**"

.10

0.10 \ \

AQUIFER TEST DATA

Owner. . Address. .County. . Slate .

Dale. Company performing lest. . Measured by.

WrtNo . Distance from pumping well. . Type of test. .Test No

Measuring equipment.

Time DataPump on: Date ____ Time __Pump of). Date ———— Time ——Duration of aquifer test

Pumping _____ Recovery.

Water Level Data

Static water level ———————Measuring point ———————Elevation ol measuring point.

Discharge DataHtp» O measuredDepth at pump/air line ______Previous pumping'' Yes __ No .

Duration ——————— End ——

Comments on lactofsattecting test data

DM* time

•Inc*

pum

Mar

led

Tim

*•In

c* p

u•to

pped

ttr

W»t»rC

orre

ctio

nor

Conv

ersi

onW«ler

Waterlev*

change• on'

of-

DtKharg*meawjrc-

Rat*

'ft -30

0,01 • /. \ \0

o.o/o.o1-,-

q-f £><«,so o.os

•3500

Itt -t oos

to 0.1 - UrlZ- 0.031. -

OP

3 .=kV 30 0,01

fltf

V

i*// O0.1 - o.os

Tt*

aoi

<e - (9,0 f

1 -

0.01-88

• 5 - is85 \ V

•9 - O

fo7. '7

IS - 74, ee

AQUIFER TEST DATA

Owner.

D«te_ Company performing lest.

.County.

. Measured by.

WelNo . Distance from pumping wed . . Type of test.

Measuring equipment.

Time DataPump on Date ____ Time ——Pump off Dale ———— Time ——Duration of aquifer lest

Pumping _____ Recovery.

-Co)-(«

Water Level Data

Slate water level ______Measuring point _______Elevation of measuring pant.

Discharge DataMfu, 0 m»a«ur»1Depth ol pump/air line ______Previous pumping'' Yes ___ No .

Duration _______ End ——

Comments on (actorsattecting tesi cata

OettCtocktkne

Time

Ince

pu•lin

ed

Tim

e•In

ce p

u•to

ppe

r/fmeiiurc-

ment

orC

onve

rsio

nWater

WM*rtev«

changetort'

a?

Rat*

'•2/15 /O

COO - d.Ol

10 - /(* '•

/O - K» - 9*09

n H \AJfVre2.ao

i^A .0*700- ft 'n

0 /vx c?

0,05 \PWA6L1/

**01

0001

30 lo01.

0001-

oo OlJ JT7

oc 00

OC Oo 00

Lk

OteCO CU

(X-30

cr>orj ex. OO

P*8«-

AQUIFER TEST DATA

Owner. .Address. .County. . Siate.

Owe. Company performing lest. . Measured by.

WHNO . Distance from pumping well. . Type of lesi. .Test No

Measuring equipment.

PumptPumptDuratio

Pum

te«t

*/|-i

xi Oal<3(1 DaKno(aqi

Time DataTime (r0)

jifer test:

ClockttTM

Ol

ex.

%»

ooV3

10|5 OJ

If

'^"-i4

'*.^^^>0^^V^L^

°-

1&S-

J^xCO

Tkm

•lne«

pum

p•l«

rt«d

(T

Z4 3Dfcoc;^^00

\>"ll

^•VIf

•V^*L•»-35-^^1<v>^

^-23.-

IV-

Tim

*•In

ccpu

mp

•topp

ed

ror?oo 5oeS*>%oV10

"_,

"

'*_

"*-

'*_

*^

-l

3°^

3<-

*°~

*_

**-

^CD

1 oc

t/r

Static waMeasurinElevation

Water

me«»ur«-

win•HiM-4fS-|f4-M•W.V)fH.W,*>^f,5344,"Zfi

.ZS

W.XV

.o(*«/3,->e^3floj la ftkC,T^1 W X

W3.01V3.ne,13

(ta ^1

i /'? i

«.bo

Wale

ter levelig point .

Level Data

of measuring po

lol

u oWater

B7fl^ '*516

f?i8

r»*

WJ**5T8U

r"?11

578

970jig"

OTL»n0T)'°Br»15

6~r$l

vti*Sjf1

eiV*

ml

W«MrItv*

change*or«'

HowGDepthPrevo

Dura

Discharge Datanwaci i«Kl

Of pump/air lirJS pumping7 >lion _ _ _ _

v>fe« No

Fnd

Dtacharg*meitur*-

&

\/

Rat*

o

N /

Comments on (actorsarteciing test data

L

L

,Table 2, Projected drawndojme using the Theis eijjiiatioa

198|WALTON - B8

AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GPD/ES ? 5849AQUIFER STORATIVITY (DIM -K? -1

FOR SCREEN DISPLAY OF RESULTS LIMIT NO. OF COLUMNSTO 9 AND NO OF ROWS TO 20.

NO. OF COLUMNS=? 9NO. OF ROWS=? 20GRID SPACING (FT)=? 50NO. OF WELLS=? 1XWELL (FT)=? 200YWELL (FT)=? 500WELL DISCHARGE (GPM)=? 112TIME (DAY)=? .625AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GPD/FT)= 5849AQUIFER STORATIVITY (DIM)= .1NO. OF COLUMNS: 9NO. OF ROWS= 20GRID SPACING (FT ) = 50NO. OF WELLS= 1XWELL (FT)= 200YWELL (FT)= 500WELL DISCHARGE (GPM)= 112TIME(DAY)= .625

DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT):

ROW =ROW =ROW rROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW rROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =ROW =

12345678910'l 1121314151617181920

0 .000.00o.oo0.000.010.020.070.170.310.380.310.170.070.020.010.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.010.050. 170.460.92

1 .200.920.460.170.050.010.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.020.080.310.922.253.522.250.920.310.080.020.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.020. 100.381.20 ;3 . 52\/20.423. 521 .200.380. 100.020.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.020.080. 310.922.253.522.250.920.310.080.020.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000 . C 10.050.170. 460.92

1 . 200.920. 460.170.050.010.000.000.000 .000.00

0 . 000.000.000.000.010.020.070.170. 310.380.310.170.070.020.010.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.000.010.020.050.080 . 100.080.050.020.010.000.000.000.000 .000.00

0.000.000 . UCo.oco.coo.oc0.010.010.020.020 . u 1:0.01(i. fj '.0. OCC . C 00 .00o.co0.00o.cco.oc

DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT)

fc

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

APPENDIX F

ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLES

L

L

fNONUflS • AKCHITWCn • MAMMfffS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST PAUL. MINNESOTA 55MO 612 490-2000

SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 1TOWN OF HALL IETEST WELL NUMBER ONE

PARAMETER (UNITS)

Temperature (deg C)Cond 3 25 C (umhos)Field pHColorTurbidityOdorAlkalinity (mg/l>Choride (mg/l)COO (mg/l)Hardness (mg/l)Nitrate-nitrogen (mg/l)Total dis sol (mg/l)Dissolved arsenic <ug/l)Dissolved barium (ug/l)Dissolved cadmium (ug/l)Dissolved chromium (ug/l)Dissolved copper (ug/l)Dissolved iron (mg/l)Dissolved lead (ug/l)Dissolved manganese (ug/l)Dissolved mercury (ug/l)Dissolved zinc (ug/l)

Water samples from 12/14415/89Hour 2 Hour 4 Hour 6 Hour 12 Hour 16

5.149

6.12nonenonenone

111

191.956

0.1

<20

r

6.648

5.98nonenonenone

121

196.569

<0.1

<20

6.548

6.00nonenonenone

111

191.849

.

<0.1

<20

4.549

5.75nonenonenone

121

191.945

<0.1

<20

6.248

5.98nonenonenone

121

191.946

<0.1

<20

Hour 20

6.749

5.69nonenonenone

121

191.954

<0.1

<20

2/5/90 3/21/90 3/21/90-

6.155

6.11nonenonenone

1222231.216<5

•00016

<50<50

<0.150<20<0.2<50

7.1545.8nonenonenone

1124231.379<5

<1002

<50<500.2<5<20<0.2<50

ND24ND8.2NDNDNDNDND5

Radon-222 (picocuries/l)

Radium-226 (picocuries/l)Radium-228 (picocuries/l)

Vol Organic Cmpds

Pesticides

2037 (at hour 13)

Det (at hour 15)

NO (at hour 15)

Det

1651

0.7

ND

997

ND

ND«No detection at or above the minimum detection levelDet=0ne or more detections below the preventive action l i m i t* Duplicate sample sent to another testing lab

REFER TO THE ENCLOSED ANALYTICAL REPORTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

L MINNESOTA

COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY, INC.514 Main Street, P.O. Box 526Colfax, Wisconsin 54730715-962-3121800 - 962 - 5227

JAN 051990SHORT, ELLIOT, HENDRICKSON

CHIPPEWA FAILS, Wl

SHORT-ELLIOTT-WNDRICKSON

421 FRQCTTE DRIVECHIPPEHA FALLS, UI 54729

REPORT NO,! 00126/01REPORT DATE: 1/04/90

DATE RECEIVED: 12/19/89PAGE 1

UI DNR LAB CERTIF.M170139BOGU1406 OU140790111 90111*2 «4

OW1409 8U140990111 90111«6 «12

GU 1410 8W141190111 90111*16 «20

DateAnalyzed

Alkalinity, ag/LChloride, ao/LHardMtt EDTA, aa/LNitrat»-Mitr»9*n, a»/LT.Dift.Salids, ag/LDinalvtd Iran* ag/L

111

191.9

560.1

< 20

121

196.5

69< 0.1

< 20

111

191.6

49< 0.1

< 20

121

191.9

45< 0.1

< 20

121

191.9

46< 0.1

< 20

121

191.9

54< 0.1

< 20

12-20-9912-27-9901-02-9012-29-9912-20-9901-02-9001-02-90

SMRln «rrivtd In lab aniSSOM en 12/19 and wri f itldfitttrtd by 9EH •• 12-14 It 12-15.

art Mt filttrtd f«r pH *r Conductivity.

LL

< NNM "LESS THAN" Dtttctafalt L*vtl Approval by!

PROFESSIONAL LABORATORY SERVICES SINCE 1952

Short, E l l i o t , Hendrickaon421 Frenet te DriveChippewa Filli , WI S4729

Attn: Bill McKinley

SCANCUST HUNBEX: 90111SAMPLED BY: ClientDATE RCC'D: 12/20/89REPORT DATE: 12/29/89APPROVED BY:

LL

B« n t•n•B r o m o f o r nB r o » o » » t h » n «Carbon T v t r a c h l o r i d *C h l o r o b « n t « n »C h l o r o « t h « n «2-Chloro«thy1viny1 Eth»rC h l o r o f o r mC h l o r o a v t h a n *C h l o r o d i b r o « o » « t h * n »1 , 2-Dichlorob«ni«n«1 , 3-Dichlorob*ni«n«1 , 4-Dichlorob«nz*n«BroaodichloroBcthcn*1 , l-Dichloro»th»n»1 , 2-Dichloro*th*n*1 , l-Dichloro«thyl«n*1 , 2-Dichloro«thyl«n*M»thyl»n« chloride1 , 2-Diehloropropin«cis-1,3-Dichloroprop»n»trtni-1 , 3-Dichloroprop«n«E t h y l b » n i » n «1 , 1 , 2,2-T*tr«chloro*th*n*T « t r « c h l o r o « t h y l « n »To 1u»n •1.1.1-Trichloro«th«n»1.1.2-Trichloro*than*T r i c h l o r o « t h y l « n «Vinyl Chlo ri d«Trichlorofluoroacthin*D i c h l o r o d i f l u o r o B « t h « n «• t p-Xyl»n» {•• B-Xyl»n«)o-Xy1«n«

A n a l y t i c a l No.:

X * Analysed but not detected.

U n i t s

4/g/ lw g / lw g / 1< / g / l4 / g / l4/9/14/9/14/9/1« g / ij /g / l09/14/9/1t /g / l4/9 /1

»/g / i4/9/14/g/ l4 /g / l4/9/14 /g / l4/9/14/9/14/9/14/g/l4/9/14/9/14/9/14/9/1

4 /g / l4/g/i4/9/1

*/g/l4/9/1

4 / g / l

D« t •

Li

0

240225020110000111020110000001211

c t i on• it

. 2

. 0

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 3

. 0

. 0

. 5

. 5

. 5

. 5

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 0

. 5

. 5

. 5

. 5

. 2

. 2

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 0

9 0 1 1 1 - 2 0

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXX

XX

0 . 9 8XXX

XX

XXX

2 5 4 1 2

90111-15

XXXXX

XXXX

X

XX

XXX

X

XX

X

X

XX

X

XX

1.38XX

X

XX

X1.04X

2 5 4 8 3

All analyses conducted in accordance with Enviroscan Quality Assurance Program.Enviroscan Inc., 303 Uest Military Rd.. Rothschild. WI 54474 1/800/338-SCAN Wisconsin Lab Certification No 737053130

STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENEUniversity of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences

465 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706

R. H. LAESSIG PH.D.. DIRECTOR S. L INHORN M.D.. MEDICAL DIRECTOR

Radiation Protection Laboratory (608) 263-4766

Frank Lowry; HydrogeologistShort-Elliott-Hendrickson421 Frenette Drive SHORT FLUOT HENOp!C)fSONChippewa Falls, WI 54729 Chitf»bVvA FMU.S wi

Results of radioactivity analysis of water sample received December 19, 1989.

Sample No. Description Radon-222

4754 Hallies Test WellCollected: 12/15/89 2037

Note: All results are in picocuries per liter.

LIr°age 1 of 1 Reported: 12-26-89

By: DS

pace.hboratories,

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Short, ElUott, Hendrlckson, Inc.421 Frenette DriveCMppewa Falls, HI 54729

Attn: Mr. William McKlnley

90111

PACE Sample Number:Date Collected:Date Received:Paramptpr

ANALYSTS

January 12, 1990PACE Project

Number: 891219505

Offices:Minneapolis, MinnesotaTampa, FloridaCoraMlle, IowaNovato, CaliforniaLeawood, KansasIrvine, CaliforniaAsheboro, North Carolina

Units

NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PESTICIDESDate AnalyzedDate ExtractedAlachlorAtrazlneChloropyrlfosCyanazlne

DlallateDlmethoateDlsulfotonFonofosLlnuronMethyl parathlon

MetolachlorMetrlbuzlnPentachloronltrobenzenePhoratePropachlorSlmazlne

TerbufosTrlfluralln

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

ug/Lug/L

MDI

0.564.10.290.80

0.500.070.220.560.420.22

0.800.360.270.190.600.50

0.520.21

47198012/15/8912/19/89Test Well*qoin_i«;

01/11/9012/20/89NDNDNDND

NDNDNDNDNDND

NDNDNDNDNDND

NDND

MDL Method Detection LimitND Not detected at or above the MDL.

IL 1710 Douglas Drive North c Minneapolis, MN 55422 = Phone (612) 544-5543

an equal opportunity employer

COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORY, INC.514 Main Street, P.O. Box 526Colfax, Wisconsin 54730715-962-3121800 - 962 - 5227

MAR 131990

SHORT-EUIOTT-HENDRICKSON

421 FRENETTE DRIUECHIPPEWA FALLS, UI 54729

REPORT NO.: 02341/01REPORT DATE: 3/09/90

DATE RECEIVED: 2/06/90PAGE 1

UI DNR LAB CERTIF.#617013980GU144Project 190111

DateAnalyzed

Alkalinity, «q/LChloride* *3/LCOD (Hi Level),«9/LHardness, eq/LNitrate-Nitrogen, eg/LPHT.Dis.Solids, eg/LDissolved Arsenic, ug/LDissolved BariuA( ug/LDissolved Cadniiui, u?/LDis. Chroiiua, ug/LDissolved Copper, uq/LDissolved Iron, aq/LDissolved Lead, ug/LDis. Manganese,ug/l.Dis< Mercury, ug/LDissolved Zinc, ug/L

1222

231.25.9

16< 5

< 10016

< 50< 50

< 0.150

< 20< 0.2

< 50

02-07-9002-07-9002-07-9002-23-9002-06-9002-07-9002-12-9003-07-9002-23-9002-26-9002-26-9002-23-9002-09-9003-09-9002-14-9002-14-9002-23-90

Samples arrived in lab at 2!00p« on 02/06 and Mere fieldfiltered by S.E.H, on 02/05/90.Staples are not filtered f«r pH or Conductivity.

LL

< Heans "LESS THAN" Detectable Level Approved by!

PROFESSIONAL LABORATORY SERVICES SINCE 1952

STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENEUniversity of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences

465 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706R. H. LAESSK3 PH.D., DIRECTOR 8. L INHORN M.D., MEDICAL DIRECTOR

Radiation Protection Laboratory (608) 263-4766

Frank LowryShort-Elliot & Hendrickson, Inc.421 Frennette DriveChippewa Falls, WI 54729

MAR 07 1990

fcv. 'A >-A..0

Results of radioactivity analysis of water samples received Febuary 6, 1990.

Sample No. Description Radium-226 Radium-228 Radon-222

4820 Test Well HA #1Collected: 02/05/90

4821 Test Well HA #1Collected: 02/05/90

0.7

1651

Note: All results are in picocuries per liter.

LPage 1 of 1

LReported: 03-06-90

By: DS

Short, Elliot, Hendrickson421 Frenette DriveChippewa Falls , WI 54729

Attn: Frank Lowry

SCANCUST NUMBER: 90111SAMPLED BY: ClientDATE REC'D: 02/06/90REPORT DATE: 02/14/90APPROVED BY: JAL

BenzeneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethane2-Chloroethylvinyl EtherChloroformChloromethaneChlorodibromomethane1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene1 , 4-DichlorobenzeneBromodichloromethane1 , 1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1.1-Dichloroethylene1.2-DichloroethyleneMethylene Chloride1 , 2-Dichloropropanecis-1 , 3-Dichloropropenetrans-l,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene1 , 1 , 2 , 2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 , 2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethylenevinyl ChlorideTrichlorof luoromethaneDichlorodif luoromethane

Analytical No. :

Units

X/9/1//g/1

x/g/1//g/1/yg/1

x/g/1i/g/1x/g/1/>g/l//g/1x/g/1x/g/1/ug/1

/wg/1//g/1

//g/1//g/1

/i/g/1

//g/1//g/1

DetectionLimit

0.224,

2,2,

0.5

5.00.52.00.51.01.00.50.50.50.51.01.01.00.52.00.51.01.00.50.50.50,0,0,

.5,2,2

1.02.0

Test Well

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

27379

X - Analyzed but not detected.

Lt 11 analyses conducted in accordance with Enviroscan Quality Assurance Program.

nviroscan Inc.. 303 West Military Rd . Rothschild. Wl 54474 1/800/338-SCAN Wisconsin Lab Certification No 737053130

COMMERCIAL TESTING U514 Main Street, P.O. Box 526Colfax, Wisconsin 54730715-962-3121800 - 962 • 5227

APR 101990

SHORT ELLIOT, HENDRICKSONCHIPPtWA FALLS. Wl

3HORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON

421 FRENETTE DRIVECHIPPEWA FALLS, UI 54729

REF-ORT NO.: 03649/01REFtDRT DATE: 4/09/90

DATE RECEIVED: 3/22/90PAGE 1

UI DNR LAB CERTIF.J417013980GW468*90111.00

luteAiMlyzed

Alka l in i t y , *q/LChloride, *9/LCOD (Hi Level), wj/LHardness, »q/L

PHT.Dis. Solids,Dissolved Arsenic, uq/LDissolved EUriu«t ug/LDissolved Cad* i UK, U9/LD is< ChroaiuM, ug/LDissolved Copper, ug/LDissolved Iron, *3/LDissolved Lead, uq/LDis. fonqanese,U9/LDis. Mercury, ug/LDissolved Zinc, uq/L

1124

231.35.8

79< 51002

50500.2

< 5< 20

< 0.2< 50

03-22-9003-27-9003-22-9003-23-9003-28-9003-22-9003-28-9003-30-9003-23-9003-30-9003-23-9003-23-9003-23-9003-28-9003-23-9004-02-9003-23-90

Staples *rrieved in lab at 3IOOp« on 3/22 «nd fieldfiltered by S.E.H on 3/21/90.Samples are not filtered fot pH or Conductivity.

LL

< Means "LESS THAN" Detectable Level Approved by!

PROFESSIONAL LABORATORY SERVICES SINCE 1952

Short, Elliot, Hendrickson421 Frenette DriveChippewa Falls , WI 54729

Attn: Bill Mckinley

CUST NUMBER:SAMPLED BY:DATE REC'D:REPORT DATE:APPROVED BY:

90111Client03/22/9004/10/90

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumCopperIronLeadManganeseMercuryZinc

Analytical No.

Units

/>g/lx/g/1A/g/lfjg/lvg/lvg/ifjg/ix/g/l

DetectionLimit

5.2,1.5.5,4.2.5.0.3.0

NO. 1

X24.X8.2XXXXX5.

29603

X - Analyzed but not detected.

IL

All analyses conducted in accordance with Enviroscan Quality Assurance Program.Enviroscan Inc., 303 West Military Rd.. Rothschild. WI 54474 1/800/338-SCAN Wisconsin Lab Certification No 737053130

STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENEUniversity of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences

465 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706R. H. LAESSK3 PH.D.. MRECTOH S. L INHORN M.D.. MEDICAL DIRECTOR

Radiation Protection Laboratory (608) 263-4766

Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc.421 Fronette DriveChippewa Falls, WI 54729 APR

SHORT.

Results of radioactivity analysis of water samples received March 23, 1990.

Sample No. Description

4890

Radium-226 Radium-228

4891

Proj. No. 90111Collected: 03/21/90

Proj. No. 90111Collected: 03/21/90 < 1.1

Radon-222

997

Note: All results are in picocuries per liter.

r°age 1 of 1 Reported: 04-06-90By: lew

Short, Elliot, Hendrickson421 Frenette DriveChippewa Falls , WI 54729

Attn: Bill Mckinley

BenzeneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroethane2-Chloroethylvinyl EtherChloroformChloromethaneChlorodibromomethane1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene1 , 4-DichlorobenzeneBromodichloromethane1 , 1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1 , 1-Dichloroethylene1, 2-DichloroethyleneMethylene Chloride1 , 2-Oichloropropanecis-1 , 3-Dichloropropenetrans-l,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene ,1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 , 2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideTrichlorof luoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethanem-Xyleneo-Xylene

Analytical No. :

Units

//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1

//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1/t/g/1//g/1//g/1

//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1//g/1

CUST NUMBER:SAMPLED BY:DATE REC'D:REPORT DATE:

90111Client03/22/9004/10/90

APPROVED BY: JRS

DetectionLimit

0.22.04.00.52.02.05.00.52.00.51.1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,

1.2.

,0,0,5,5,5,5,0,0,0

0.52.00.5

00000.20.2,0,0

1.01.0

NO. 1

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

29603

X - Analyzed but not detected.

LL

All analyses conducted in accordance with Enviroscan Quality Assurance Program.Env.ro.can Inc.. 303 West Military Rd. Rothschild. WI 54474 1/800/338-SCAN Wisconsin Ub Certification No 737053130