Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

73
Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    1

Transcript of Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Page 1: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping

Page 2: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 3: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 4: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 5: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 6: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

The image of this cube contradicts the optical image

Page 7: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 8: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 9: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 10: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 11: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 12: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 13: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 14: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Stochastic Completion Fields

Page 15: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Stochastic Completion Fields

Page 16: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Stochastic Completion Fields

Page 17: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Hough Transform

Page 18: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Hough Transform

Page 19: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Shortest Path

Page 20: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Curve Evolution

Page 21: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Curve Evolution

Page 22: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Thresholding

Page 23: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Histogram

0 50 100 150 200 250

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Page 24: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Thresholding

Page 25: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Thresholding

125

15699

Page 26: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 27: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Local Uncertainty

Page 28: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Global Certainty

Page 29: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Local Uncertainty

Page 30: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Global Certainty

Page 31: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Minimum Cut

Page 32: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Texture Examples

Page 33: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Coarse Measurements for Texture

Page 34: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Hilbert Transform

-100 -50 0 50 100-0.01

-0.005

0

0.005

0.01

-100 -50 0 50 1000

0.004

0.008

0.012

0.016

Gaussian Hilbert Transform

1 ( )[ ( )]

f x dxH f x

x y

Page 35: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Filter Bank

Page 36: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Textons

image textons

textonassignment

Page 37: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Normalized Cuts

Page 38: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

The Pixel Graph

ij w

Couplings

reflect intensity similarity

{}ij w

Page 39: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Hierarchical Graph

Page 40: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Normalized-Cut Measure

Si

Siui 0

1

Page 41: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Normalized-Cut Measure2( ) ( )ij i j

i j

E S w u u

Si

Siui 0

1

( ) ij i jN S w u u

( )( )

( )

E SS

N S

Minimize:

Page 42: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Recursive Coarsening

iuju

Page 43: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Recursive Coarsening

iuju

lU

kU

Representative subset

1 2( , ,..., )NU U U U

Page 44: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Recursive Coarsening

iuju

2

11

2

.

..

Nn

u

U

P

u

Uu

U

For a salient segment :

P ( )n N ,sparse interpolation matrix

kU

lU

Page 45: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Weighted Aggregation

ijwi

jjlp

aggregate k aggregate l

ijk ik jli j

l p pwW

klWikp

Page 46: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Segment Detection

Page 47: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

A Chicken and Egg Problem

Problem:Coarse measurements mix neighboring statistics

Solution: support of measurements is determined as the segmentation process proceed

Page 48: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Adaptive vs Rigid Support

AveragingSWA Geometric

Page 49: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Adaptive vs Rigid Support

InterpolationSWA Geometric

Page 50: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

AggregateShape

Page 51: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Boundary Integrity

Page 52: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Sharpen the Aggregates

Top-down Sharpening:• Expand core• Sharpen boundaries

Page 53: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Experiments

• Our SWA algorithm (CVPR’00 + CVPR’01) run-time: 5-10 seconds.

• Normalized cuts (Shi and Malik, PAMI’00; Malik et al., IJCV’01) run-time: about 10-15 minutes.

Software courtesy of Doron Tal, UC Berkeley.

images on a pentium III 1000MHz PC:200 200

Page 54: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Use of Multiscale Variance Vector

Page 55: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Use of Multiscale Variance Vector

Page 56: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Variance: Avoid Mixing

aggregation Moving window

Page 57: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Texture Aggregation

Fine (homogeneous) Coarse (heterogeneous)

Page 58: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Squirrel

Page 59: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Leopard

Page 60: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Texture Composition

WithVariance only

With all measures

Page 61: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Tiger

Page 62: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Butterfly

Page 63: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Bird

Page 64: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Owl

Page 65: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Lion Cub

Page 66: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Polar Bear

Page 67: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Segmentation with Ncuts(Malik et al).

Page 68: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.

Complexity

• Every level contains about half the nodes of the previous level:

• Total #nodes double #pixels

• All connections are local, cleaning small weights

• Top-down sharpening: constant number of levels

• Linear complexity

• Implementation: 5 seconds for 400x400

Page 69: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 70: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 71: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 72: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.
Page 73: Segmentation and Perceptual Grouping. The image of this cube contradicts the optical image.