Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

37

description

Explaining Crime

Transcript of Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Page 1: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 2: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Explaining Crime• Classical-Neoclassical

– General Deterrence– Rational Choice– Routine Activity

• Positivist– Social Disorganization– Social Learning– Neutralization– Strain– Control

• Other/Real World Application

Page 3: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Which do you agree with most?

Page 4: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Classical-Neoclassical

Page 5: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

General Deterrence

Page 6: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

General Deterrence• Severity

– Exceed the amount of damage done to society

• Celerity– Swiftness-promptness of punishment after

crime

• Certainty– Commonsense? The more likely

punishment is the more fearful the offender of being caught

Page 7: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Rational Choice• Builds on deterrence, started neoclassical school• Assumes

– Every crime has a purpose– Criminals choose to commit crime based on limited ability

to weigh benefits and risks

• Three parts– Initiation (leads up to first offense)– Habituation (continued offending)– Desistence (becomes noncriminal or changes crime)

Page 8: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Routine Activity

• Focus on why crimes occur at specific places and times

• Posits that crime is the function of the space-time convergence of a motivated offender, suitable target, and lack of capable guardianship.

Page 9: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Routine Activity

CriminalCriminalPropertyProperty

Not GuardedNot Guarded

Page 10: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Positivist

Page 11: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 12: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Social Disorganization

• Rapid changes in an areas characteristics allows crime to occur.

• People in areas of residential mobility lack a mutual trust with neighbors.

• Higher crime occurs when neighbors don’t know each other well.

Page 13: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 14: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Social Learning• Criminal behavior is learned• Delinquency occurs when more conditions are

favorable to breaking the law than unfavorable

• A person becomes a criminal when more of their friends are criminals or support them

• Criminals learn – Motive– Attitude– Technique

Page 15: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 16: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Neutralization

• People believe crime is wrong, commit it anyway, and still believe crime is wrong

• Offenders rationalize actions, creating exceptions for their actions

Page 17: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 18: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Strain 1 (Merton)

• Americans want the dream and work ethic• Strain is the disjunction between goals and

means, and provokes response– Innovate by rejecting tradition (steal, etc.)– Turn to ritualism (keep working with limited

results)– Retreat and turn to drugs– Rebel – create new goals and means (sometimes

forming new community)

Page 19: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 20: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Strain 2 (Cohen)

• Also known as status frustration• Goals based on status, not

finances• Middle class is the standard• Lower classes humiliated, seek

status elsewhere

Page 21: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 22: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Strain 3 (Cloward-Ohlin)• Youth look for alternative goals• If illegitimate alternative supports skills,

may join criminal group (gang).• If illegitimate alternative does not support

skills, may join a conflict group (gang).• If neither criminal nor conflict associations

work, may resort to retreating (drugs).

Page 23: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 24: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Strain 4 (Agnew)• Strain is caused by

–Removal of positive valued stimuli–Presentation of negative stimuli–People commit crimes when they

lose something they like or someone does something they don’t like

Page 25: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 26: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Control 1 (Hirschi)• Focus on why people aren’t criminal• Four social factors affect delinquency

– Attachment (affection for parents/school)– Commitment (investment in criminal

activity)– Involvement (if no free time, no

opportunity)– Belief (belief/consensus that a thing is

wrong prevents us from doing it

Page 27: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 28: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Control 2 (Gottfredson-Hirschi)

• Poor child-rearing is the root cause of all crime as it results in low self-control

Page 29: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 30: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Other

• Critical theory – crime is a normal function of certain groups

• Marxist theory – conflict exists between upper-lower classes

• Feminist theories – females less likely to commit crimes

• Life course theories – teenage youth account for most crime

Page 31: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Real World Application

Page 32: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Which do you agree with most?Which do you agree with most?

• General Deterrence• Rational Choice• Routine Activity• Social Disorganization• Social Learning• Neutralization• Strain• Control

• General Deterrence• Rational Choice• Routine Activity• Social Disorganization• Social Learning• Neutralization• Strain• Control

Text message or Internet

Page 33: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Internet vote http://tinyurl.com/theory4860

Text vote

99503

Internet vote http://tinyurl.com/theory4860

Text vote

99503

Page 34: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime
Page 35: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

Review

• Scientific v. non-scientific theory• Assumptions made in neoclassical school• Which theory focuses on why people

don’t become criminals• What part of Strain theory describes

crime for money?

Page 36: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime

That’s all . . .

Page 37: Security Administration I 4 Explaining Crime