SECTION DE Génie mécanique · SECTION DE Génie mécanique ... ABB Global Industries & ......

1
SECTION DE Génie mécanique Multi-Objective Optimization applied To MicroGrid Author Guillaume Ridoux Supervisor Dr François Maréchal Acknowledgements Shrikant Bhat Dr François Maréchal ABB Global Industries & Services Ltd. Bangalore, India Motivation & Objectives The MicroGrid technology is part of the ”smartgrid” technological concept. While it aims at improving the efficiency of energy production, the smartgrid technology is expected to achieve a fast deployment in the forthcoming years. In this study, a MicroGrid management problem is formulated, from the modeling of the system, to the definition of the objectives to optimize. The aim of the project is to evaluate the opportunities offered by Genetic algorithm for solving multi-objective problem in the case of MicroGrid system operation. In this study, a MicroGrid system previously studied in the literature is analyzed. The possibility to produce combined heat and power has been added to the original model in order to obtain a better overall efficiency. A Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) and a MicroTurbine (MT) are used for cogeneration; a battery, a Wind Turbine, Photovoltaic solar panels and the grid also supply electricity. A boiler has been added to be sure that the thermal demand is met at any time. MicroGrid Model Formulation of the multi-objective optimization problem Decision making method Sensitivity analysis When dealing with more than two objectives the Pareto set becomes much more complex. It is worth studying the objective space and relating it with the decision variables space in order to get a better overview of the solutions available before taking decision. A GUI has been used to identify the solutions of the Pareto set. The possible deviations from the reference case are studied through various sensitivity analysis and two options for the trading of electricity are compared. The battery storage is an important component of the system when stability enters into play. It allows to compensate the losses due to the stable operation of the units. The comparison between the solutions shows the range of performances reachable under the conditions studied. A preferred solution is selected using a Multi-Attribute Decision-Making method that allows obtaining weights inherent to the distribution of the solutions. This method has the advantage to be valid even if the objectives are expressed in different units. The Genetic Algorithm gives the possibility to find optimum for objectives expressed in different units. The economic/environmental dispatch problem is implemented and a third objective, improving the operation of the utility with respect to the effects caused by load transient, is added. Study of the Pareto set 3 Dimensional Pareto Set with observed solutions Architecture of the studied Microgrid Projections of the Pareto set Evolution of the battery level along the day for five different solutions Representation of the electricity production profile for the E-TOPSIS solution. Min ( W Average,i ! W i t ) 2 W i t "0 i= 1 N # t = 1 T # (kWh 2 ) if (T-t off ,i )>0 W Average,i = W i t t = 1 T # (T ! t off,i ) (kWh) else W Average,i = 0. Conclusion & future work 1. Ref Case. 2. -20% Demand load. 3. 15kWh battery. 4. Flat electricity import price Min Expenditures t ! Incomes t W supplied t t = 1 T =24 " ($/kWh) Min (e GWP, FC t + e GWP, ICE t + e GWP, MT t + e GWP, Grid t + e GWP, Boiler t ) t = 1 T ! (kg CO 2 eq / day ) This study contributes in the development of MG by providing further information to the decision maker on the quality of its operation strategy. The results have shown that buying the electricity at the market price was enabling better benefits and higher stability, because of the lower price. However, it involves higher imports, and therefore higher emissions. The formulation of the objective for the operation stability brings an important feature to the optimization. Indeed the production profiles obtained can become more stable, and it creates a new strategy for the use of storage devices.

Transcript of SECTION DE Génie mécanique · SECTION DE Génie mécanique ... ABB Global Industries & ......

Page 1: SECTION DE Génie mécanique · SECTION DE Génie mécanique ... ABB Global Industries & ... MicroTurbine (MT) are used for cogeneration; a battery, ...

SECTION DE

Génie mécanique

Multi-Objective Optimization applied To MicroGrid

Author

Guillaume Ridoux

Supervisor

Dr François Maréchal

Acknowledgements Shrikant Bhat

Dr François Maréchal

ABB Global Industries &

Services Ltd. Bangalore, India

Motivation & Objectives The MicroGrid technology is part of the ”smartgrid” technological concept. While it aims at improving the efficiency of energy production, the smartgrid technology is expected to achieve a fast deployment in the forthcoming years. In this study, a MicroGrid management problem is formulated, from the modeling of the system, to the definition of the objectives to optimize.

The aim of the project is to evaluate the opportunities offered by Genetic algorithm for solving multi-objective problem in the case of MicroGrid system operation.

In this study, a MicroGrid system previously studied in the literature is analyzed. The possibility to produce combined heat and power has been added to the original model in order to obtain a better overall efficiency.

A Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) and a MicroTurbine (MT) are used for cogeneration; a battery, a Wind Turbine, Photovoltaic solar panels and the grid also supply electricity. A boiler has been added to be sure that the thermal demand is met at any time.

MicroGrid Model

Formulation of the multi-objective optimization problem

Decision making method

Sensitivity analysis

When dealing with more than two objectives the Pareto set becomes much more complex. It is worth studying the objective space and relating it with the decision variables space in order to get a better overview of the solutions available before taking decision. A GUI has been used to identify the solutions of the Pareto set.

The possible deviations from the reference case are studied through various sensitivity analysis and two options for the trading of electricity are compared. The battery storage is an important component of the system when stability enters into play. It allows to compensate the losses due to the stable operation of the units. The comparison between the solutions shows the range of performances reachable under the conditions studied.

A preferred solution is selected using a Multi-Attribute Decision-Making method that allows obtaining weights inherent to the distribution of the solutions. This method has the advantage to be valid even if the objectives are expressed in different units.

The Genetic Algorithm gives the possibility to find optimum for objectives expressed in different units. The economic/environmental dispatch problem is implemented and a third objective, improving the operation of the utility with respect to the effects caused by load transient, is added.

Study of the Pareto set

3 Dimensional Pareto Set with observed solutions

Architecture of the studied Microgrid

Projections of the Pareto set

Evolution of the battery level along the day

for five different solutions

Representation of the electricity production profile for the

E-TOPSIS solution.

Min (WAverage,i !Wit )2

Wit"0

i=1

N

#t=1

T

# (kWh2 )

if (T-toff ,i )>0 WAverage,i =Wi

t

t=1

T

#(T ! toff,i )

(kWh)

else WAverage,i = 0.

Conclusion & future work

1.  Ref Case. 2. -20% Demand load. 3. 15kWh battery. 4. Flat electricity import price

Min Expenditurest ! Incomest

Wsuppliedt

t=1

T=24

" ($/kWh)

Min (eGWP, FCt + eGWP, ICE

t + eGWP, MTt + eGWP, Grid

t + eGWP, Boilert )

t=1

T

!

(kgCO2eq/ day)

This study contributes in the development of MG by providing further information to the decision maker on the quality of its operation strategy. The results have shown that buying the electricity at the market price was enabling better benefits and higher stability, because of the lower price. However, it involves higher imports, and therefore higher emissions. The formulation of the objective for the operation stability brings an important feature to the optimization. Indeed the production profiles obtained can become more stable, and it creates a new strategy for the use of storage devices.