Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the...

29
Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur

description

Expected Value Expected value the average net gain or loss that we would expect per game if we played the game many times.

Transcript of Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the...

Page 1: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Section 9.1Great Expectations

Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future

Chance favors only the prepared mind.Louis Pasteur

Page 2: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Question of the Day

If your bicycle is worth $1000, does it make sense to buy theft insurance that costs $50 per year?

Page 3: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Expected Value

Expected value the average net gain or loss that we would expect per game if we played the game many times.

Page 4: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Expected Value

Computing Expected Value:

To compute the expected value, we multiply the value of each outcome with its probability of occurring and then add up all those products.

Page 5: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Expected Value

A game is called a fair game if the expected value equals zero.

Page 6: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Paradox

A paradox presents a situation that has two possible interpretations or resolutions.

Each view appears irrefutable, and yet the views are diametrically opposed to each other.

Page 7: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Newcomb’s Paradox

Page 8: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Section 9.2Risk

Deciding Personal and Public Policy

The moral:Beware of unintended consequences.

Page 9: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Question of the Day

An HIV test is 95% accurate for infected people. Suppose your roommate’s test result is positive. What are the chances your roommate has HIV?

Page 10: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Goal

When facing issues, we want to take steps to help us make informed decisions.

Page 11: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Risk

How do we measure risk?

Page 12: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Consider Unintended Consequences

Page 13: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Section 9.3Money Matters

Deciding Between Faring Well and Welfare

Lack of money is the root of all evil.Mark Twain

Page 14: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Question of the Day

Adam and Eve invest one penny in a bankaccount paying 3% compounded annually.How much money will the account hold after1000 years: $10,000? $100,000? $1 million?$1 billion?

Page 15: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

A Compounding Pattern

Page 16: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Section 9.4Peril at the Polls

Deciding Who Actually Wins an Election

… Democracy is the worst form of government except all those others

that have been tried from time to time.Winston Churchill

Page 17: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Question of the Day

How do you pick the winner of a democraticelection?

Page 18: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

An Election Conundrum

Page 19: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Simple Voting Methods

Plurality VotingEach voter votes for one person, and the

candidate with the most votes wins.

Page 20: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Simple Voting Methods

Vote-for-TwoEach voter must vote for two different

candidates and the candidate with the most votes wins.

Page 21: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Simple Voting Methods

Borda CountEach voter ranks all the candidates: 1, 2, 3,

and so on. The highest ranking is 1. The rankings are then tallied for each candidate, and the candidate with the lowest total wins.

Page 22: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Condorcet’s Paradox

The cumulative ranking of the group as a whole may not be transitive – that is, the ranking may have a circle of preferences.

Page 23: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Arrow’s Election Disaster Theorem

Page 24: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Section 9.5Cutting Cake for Greedy PeopleDeciding How to Slice Up Scarce Resources

Choose a convenient representation of an issue.

Page 25: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Question of the Day

Can you always cut a cake so that everyonegets his or her favorite piece?

Page 26: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Cake-Cutting Question

Given a cake and three people, is there a method of cutting the cake equitably?

Page 27: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Greedy Division Question

Given a cake and three people, is there a method for cutting cake into three pieces so that each person gets the piece that he or she believes has the greatest value?

In other words, can the cake be divided into three pieces so that, of the resulting slices, everyone gets their favorite piece?

Page 28: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Greedy Division Theorem

Suppose three preference diagrams are superimposed. Then there will be a point where the three people have indicated that they all prefer different pieces.

Page 29: Section 9.1 Great Expectations Deciding How to Weigh the Unknown Future Chance favors only the prepared mind. Louis Pasteur.

Four or More People

What happens if we want to divide a cake among four people?