Norms and International Relations: The anachronistic nature of neo ...
Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation? The “’Otzar” in Ancient...
-
Upload
garey-allen -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation? The “’Otzar” in Ancient...
Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
The “’Otzar” in Ancient Ritual Baths
Yonatan AdlerAriel University Center
of Samaria
The bath must contain a minimum volume of water which would allow for the full immersion of an adult, a volume measured in rabbinic metrological terms as forty se’ah, probably equivalent to about half of a cubic meter.
This minimum volume of water must derive from either rain or spring-water channeled directly into the mikveh, as drawn-water would render the bath unfit for ritual use.
1.
2.
MIQWA’OT (JEWISH RITUAL IMMERSION BATHS)
IN ERETZ-ISRAEL
IN THE SECOND TEMPLE AND THE MISHNAH AND TALMUD
PERIODS
THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE ‘DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY’
TO THE SENATE OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY, JERUSALEMBY RONNY REICH
1990
Miqwa’ot without an ’Otzar (265)
Miqwa’ot with an ’Otzar (17)
Miqwa’ot With a Questionable ’Otzar (18)
They may purify mikva’ot, whether a higher [pool] from a lower [pool], or a distant [pool] from one which is nearby. How so? One brings a pipe of earthenware or of lead and places his hand beneath it until it is filled with water [from one pool], and he has drawn it along and brought [this water] into contact [with the water of the other pool]; even if it touches by a hair’s breadth – it suffices.
(Mishnah, Mikva’ot 6:8)
If there were forty se’ah in the upper [pool] and nothing in the lower, one may draw water [in vessels, carry them] on the shoulder, and pour [the drawn-water] into the upper pool until forty se’ah [of water] flows down into the lower [pool].
(Mishnah, Mikva’ot 6:8)
Rabbi David Münzberg inspecting the mikveh in the southern casemate wall of Masada (February 11, 1964)