SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin...
Transcript of SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin...
![Page 1: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEWTodd Stevens | President & CEO | August 2, 2018
Mark Smith | Senior EVP & CFO
![Page 2: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 2
Forward Looking / Cautionary StatementsThis presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could materially affect our expected results of operations, liquidity, cash flows and
business prospects. Such statements include those regarding our expectations as to our future:
Actual results may differ from anticipated results, sometimes materially, and reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. While we believe
assumptions or bases underlying our expectations are reasonable and make them in good faith, they almost always vary from actual results, sometimes materially. We also believe
third-party statements we cite are accurate but have not independently verified them and do not warrant their accuracy or completeness. Factors (but not necessarily all the factors)
that could cause results to differ include:
Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "intend," "likely," "may," "might," "plan," "potential," "project," "seek," "should," "target, "will" or
"would" and similar words that reflect the prospective nature of events or outcomes typically identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of
the date on which such statement is made and we undertake no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for important information about 3P reserves and other hydrocarbon resource quantities, finding and development costs, recycle
ratio calculations, and drilling locations.
• financial position, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations
• business prospects
• transactions and projects
• operating costs
• Value Creation Index (VCI) metrics, which are based on certain estimates including
future production rates, costs and commodity prices
• operations and operational results including production, hedging and capital investment
• Capital budgets and maintenance capital requirements
• reserves
• type curves
• commodity price changes
• debt limitations on our financial flexibility
• insufficient cash flow to fund planned investment or changes to our capital plan
• inability to enter desirable transactions including asset sales and joint ventures
• legislative or regulatory changes, including those related to drilling, completion, well
stimulation, operation, maintenance or abandonment of wells or facilities, managing
energy, water, land, greenhouse gases or other emissions, protection of health, safety and
the environment, or transportation, marketing and sale of our products
• unexpected geologic conditions
• changes in business strategy
• inability to replace reserves
• effects of PSC-type contracts on production and unit production costs
• effect of stock price on costs associated with incentive compensation
• insufficient capital, including as a result of lender restrictions, unavailability of capital
markets or inability to attract potential investors
• effects of hedging transactions and limitations on our ability to enter such transactions
• equipment, service or labor price inflation or unavailability
• availability or timing of, or conditions imposed on, permits and approvals
• lower-than-expected production, reserves or resources from development projects or
acquisitions or higher-than-expected decline rates
• joint ventures and acquisition activities and our ability to achieve expected synergies
• disruptions due to accidents, mechanical failures, transportation or storage constraints,
natural disasters, labor difficulties, cyber attacks or other catastrophic events
• factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K available on our
website at crc.com.
![Page 3: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 3
Key Highlights
134 Mboe/d62% Oil
$245 Million$337 million Core
Adjusted EBITDAX3
$194 Million2
$170 million internally funded
83 Gross Wells Drilled1
includes 48 CRC wells
Capital
Adj. EBITDAX4
ACTIVITY
PRODUCTION129 Mboe/d62% Oil
$495 Million$622 million Core
Adjusted EBITDAX3
$355 Million2
$309 million internally funded
157 Gross Wells Drilled1
includes 92 CRC wells
2nd Quarter 2018 First Half 2018
1 Includes JV and non operated wells.2 Includes JV capital.3 Excludes settled hedges of $31MM in Q1 and $68MM in Q2 and cash settled equity compensation of $4MM in Q1 and $24MM in Q2.4 See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for a reconciliation to the closest GAAP measure and other important information.
![Page 4: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 4
Development Results Driving Growth
Sacramento Basin
5,000 BOE per Day
No Drilling Rigs in Q2
San Joaquin Basin
98,000 BOE per Day
7 Drilling Rigs
Ventura Basin
6,000 BOE per Day
No Drilling Rigs in Q2
1H 2018 Results of Major Drilling Programs
Q2 2018 Operations Results
Los Angeles Basin
25,000 BOE per Day
3 Drilling Rigs
Drilling Program History
0
50
100
150
200
HuntingtonBeach
Long Beach BV Hills BV Nose (Pre-Steam)Kern Front
0
10
20
30
40
Avg
30
Day
IP (
BO
EPD
)
Wel
ls O
nlin
e >3
0 d
ays
Well Count Avg 30 Day IP
Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin
0
25
50
75
100
Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018
Wel
ls D
rille
d
San Joaquin Los Angeles Ventura Sacramento
1 Includes JV wells.2 Kern Front wells are steam flood wells which have low IPs and then ramp up over a period of 12-24 months.
Avg D&C
Cost ($MM)
per well
$3.00 $1.53 $2.10 $3.30 $0.42
1 1,2
![Page 5: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 5
Deep Inventory of Actionable Projects at $65 Brent
Portfolio Spectrum
• Growth portfolio focus, fully
burdened
• All projects meet a Value
Creation Index (VCI)1
threshold of 1.3 at $65
Brent and $3.00 NYMEX,
and deliver robust cash flow
• Portfolio has large
contributions from all
recovery mechanisms and
reserves types
• Many projects take
advantage of existing
infrastructure, while other
newer projects may require
infrastructure investment in
facilities and sales points
1 For further information on how VCI is calculated please see the end notes. 2 Full cycle costs = operating costs + development costs + facility costs + field-level G&A + taxes other than on income.3 See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for details regarding net resources.
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800De
ve
lop
me
nt
Ca
pit
al ($
B)
Net Resources3 (MMBoe)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Fu
ll C
ycle
Co
st2
($/B
oe
)
Net Resources3 (MMBoe)
Steamflood
Waterflood
Primary
Shale
Gas
![Page 6: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 6
$15MM Implemented
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20
Annualized Synergies ($MM)
Elk Hills Acquisition Synergies
• Streamlined Operations
• Equipment Optimization
• Redundancy Elimination
• Processing Efficiencies
Implemented Savings & Other Synergies
Estimated Annualized Elk Hills Synergies
Initial synergy estimate
within 6 months
Target total synergies
over 18 months
![Page 7: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 7
Resilient Resource Base
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18E**
Ca
pit
al ($
MM
)
MB
oe
/d
Oil NGL Gas Total Capital* CRC Capital (Internally Funded)
Net Production By Stream (Mboe/d)
*Total Capital reflected in the graph includes the capital investment of internal CRC capital as well as all JV partners which include BSP and MIRA. Please
note our consolidated financial statements include BSP’s investment and exclude MIRA’s investment based on the accounting treatment of each venture.
** Q3 2018 Capital guidance includes CRC, BSP and MIRA capital.
![Page 8: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 8
Q1'16
Q2'16
Q3'16
Q4'16
Q1'17
Q2'17
Q3'17
Q4'17
Q1'18
Q2'18
Q3E'18
Field Production1
Field Oil Prod (MBOPD) Field NGL Prod (MBOPD) Field Gas Prod (MBOEPD)
Production Delivers Growth with Expanding Adjusted EBITDAX Margins
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16 Q4 '16 Q1 '17 Q2 '17 Q3 '17 Q4 '17 Q1 '18 Q2 '18$
MM
Adjusted EBITDAX
Adj. EBITDAX Margin
Impact of Accounting Change
Adj. EBITDAX
Core Adj. EBITDAX
CRC reversed oil decline and is
growing Adjusted EBITDAX
1 Field Production includes gross production from the Wilmington field, which is subject to PSCs, and net production from all other assets.2 Core Adjusted EBITDAX excludes settled hedges and equity compensation costs. See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for a reconciliation of Core
Adjusted EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX to the closest GAAP measure and other important information.3 Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under the new revenue recognition accounting standard while prior periods are
not adjusted and continue to be reported under accounting standards in effect for the prior period.
3
2
2
2
Elk Hills Acquisition
![Page 9: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 9
Drilling
JV - Capital
Workover
Development Facilities
Exploration Other
San Joaquin
Ventura
Los Angeles
Production Enhancement Plans for 2018• CRC 2018 capital plan will be directed to oil-weighted projects in our core fields: Elk Hills,
Wilmington, Kern Front, Huntington Beach, and continued delineation of Buena Vista, Ventura
and Southern San Joaquin Areas
• Additional Capital will be deployed to Drilling, Workovers and Facilities focused in the Ventura
and San Joaquin Basins
• JV capital will be focused in the San Joaquin Basin and Huntington Beach
• We have a dynamic plan that can be scaled up or down depending on the price environment and
efficient deployment of joint venture proceeds
2018 Capital Investment Program – Transitioning to Mid-Cycle Commodity Prices
Approx. $650 to $700 million
1Facility and other support capital are apportioned to producing wells in the year they are drilled.2IRR estimate for the 2017 development program. VCI is calculated by dividing the net present value of the project’s expected pre-tax cash flow over its life by the net present value of the investments, each using a 10% discount rate.3Other includes maintenance and occupational health, safety and environmental projects, seismic, and other investments.
2018E Total Capital Plan
Including JVs
2018E Internally Funded
Development Capital By Drive
47%
15%
13%
21%
3%
Conventional
Waterfloods
Steamfloods
Unconventional
46%
31%
13%
At $65 flat Brent and $3 NYMEX, the
fully-burdened1 2017 CRC Development
Program delivered a 2.0 VCI or 45% IRR2
Approx. $405 million Approx. $405 million
10%
2018E Internally Funded
Development Capital By Basin
67%
5%
28%
1%3
![Page 10: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 10
80
90
100
110
120
130
2017 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Oil
Pro
du
ctio
n (
MB
/d)
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
2,400
Ad
just
ed E
BIT
DA
X
($M
M)
Portfolio Flexibility Provides Range of Crude Oil Scenarios
Note: Scenarios assume flat pricing from $55 to $75 Brent and $3.00 to $3.10 NYMEX gas, respectively. Assumes varying lease operating costs within historical ranges depending on the commodity prices of the planning scenario outcomes. Ranges of portfolio planning
scenario outcomes assume development of a variety of combinations of steamflood, waterflood, conventional and unconventional projects in our inventory and reflect estimates of geologic, development and permitting risk. All discretionary cash flow is reinvested in
business in 2019 and beyond for each scenario. Please see end notes for further information regarding Adjusted EBITDAX.1 See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for a description of the calculation of the debt-adjusted per share basis and other important information.2 See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for a reconciliation to the closest GAAP measure and other important information.
Combined with mid-cycle commodity
prices, we are positioned for growth in:
• Cash flow
• Production
• Reserves
in total and on a debt-adjusted per share
basis1
Portfolio
Planning
Scenarios
Portfolio
Planning
Scenarios
Capital focused on oil projects that provide
Increasing
Margins
Low
Decline Rates
Compounding
Cash Flow+ =
-
Estimated Crude Oil Production Outcomes
0300600900
1,2001,5001,800
2017 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Cap
ital
($
MM
) Estimated Ranges of Capital Investments
Estimated Range of Adjusted EBITDAX Outcomes
- ≈
≈
![Page 11: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 11
$3.26 $3.14 $2.95 $3.00 $2.87 $2.75
$2.90 $2.47 $2.56 $2.77 $2.81
$2.25
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1Q 2017 2Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2018 2Q 2018
$/M
cf
NYMEX Realizations
CRC – Price Realizations
66% 62%72% 79%
69%
62%
63% 59%66%
72%64%
56%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1Q 2017 2Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2018 2Q 2018
% o
f W
TI
& B
ren
t
WTI Brent
$51.91 $48.29
$48.21
$55.40
$62.87
$67.88
$50.24 $47.98
$50.02
$56.92 $62.77
$64.11 $54.66 $50.92 $52.18
$61.54
$67.18 $74.90
30
40
50
60
70
80
1Q 2017 2Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2018 2Q 2018
$/B
bl
WTI Realizations Brent
Realization
% of WTI97% 99% 104% 103% 100% 94%
Realization
% of NYMEX89 % 79% 87% 92% 98%* 82%*
Oil Price Realization (with Hedges) Gas Price Realization
NGL Price Realization - % of WTI & Brent
CRC believes near-term crude oil
differentials will remain strong
• California refinery demand for native crude continues to be strong
and reduction in heavy waterborne crude has positively influenced
differentials.
• Natural gas prices impacted by continued limits on 3rd party storage
• NGL prices have been supported by lower inventories and export
markets.
-≈
*See attachment 6 of the Earnings Release for information regarding
the effects of an accounting change on realized natural gas prices.
*
Seasonality in NGL prices
experienced in Q2 every year
*
![Page 12: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 12
120
234
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3501H17 Volume Price* Costs Interest
Working
Capital/Other 1H18$
MM
Strong Cash Flow GrowthO
pe
rati
ng
Ca
sh
Flo
w
*Includes effects of PSCs
![Page 13: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 13
250 245
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350Q1 2018
Elk Hills
Acquisition Price Settled Hedges
Long Term Equity
Compensation
Expense Other* Q2 2018$
MM
Cash settled – avoided share count dilution
Cash Generation Improvement Offset by Hedges and Equity CompensationA
dju
ste
d E
BIT
DA
X
*Other includes lower seasonal trading income and higher G&A partially due to timing.
![Page 14: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 14
Quarterly Cost Comparison
2Q17 1Q18 2Q18 2Q18
Production costs
($/Boe)$18.34 $19.08 $18.93 $18.52
Production costs
excluding PSC effects
($/Boe)
$17.18 $17.47 $17.41 $17.00
Taxes other than on
income ($MM)$31 $38 $37
Exploration expense
($MM)$6 $8 $6
Interest expense
($MM)$83 $92 $94
Without the increase
in compensation due
to stock price
![Page 15: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 15
2Q18 Results Summary Comparison
2Q17 1Q18 2Q18
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stock per
Share – Diluted
($1.13) ($0.05) ($1.70)
Adjusted Earnings (Loss) per Share – Diluted* ($1.83) $0.18 ($0.29)
Oil Production 83 MBbl/d 77 MBbl/d 83 MBbl/d
Total Production 129 MBoe/d 123 MBoe/d 134 MBoe/d
Realized Oil Price w/ Hedge ($/Bbl) $47.98 $62.77 $64.11
Realized NGL Price ($/Bbl) $30.08 $43.13 $42.13
Realized Natural Gas Price ($/Mcf) $2.47 $2.81 $2.25
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stock ($48) MM ($2) MM ($82) MM
Adjusted EBITDAX* $161 MM $250 MM $245 MM
Internally Funded Capital Investments $45 MM $139 MM $170 MM
Cash Flow (used) provided by Operations ($13) MM $200 MM $34 MM
* See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for a reconciliation to the closest GAAP measure and other important information.
![Page 16: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 16
Recent Transactions - Improving Debt Metrics
6/30/2018
1st Lien 2014 Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) 277$
1st Lien 2017 Term Loan 1,300
1st Lien 2016 Term Loan 1,000
2nd Lien Notes 2,153
Senior Unsecured Notes 345
Total Debt 5,075
Less cash1
(19)
Total Net Debt 5,056
Mezzanine Equity 735
Equity (645)
Total Net Capitalization 5,146$
Total Debt / Total Net Capitalization 99%
Total Debt / LTM Adjusted EBITDAX3
5.1x
LTM Adjusted EBITDAX3
/ LTM Interest Expense 2.8x
PV-104 / Total Debt 1.0x
Total Debt / Proved Reserves5 ($/Boe) $7.44
Total Debt / Proved Developed Reserves5 ($/Boe) $10.42
Total Debt / 2Q18 Production ($/Boepd) $37,873
Capitalization ($MM)
1 Excludes $23MM of restricted cash.2 Includes $144 million of noncontrolling interest equity for BSP and Ares.3 LTM Adjusted EBITDAX includes a +$85 million adjustment as a result of the Elk Hills transaction.4 PV-10 includes an estimate of the Elk Hills reserves acquired at SEC 2017 pricing. See the Investor Relations
page at www.crc.com for details on this calculation.5 Reserves include an estimate of the Elk Hills reserves acquired at SEC 2017 pricing.
2
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
2nd Lien Notes
2014 RCF
Unsecured Notes
2016 Term Loan
2017 Term Loan
Debt Maturities ($MM)
Notable Quarterly Highlights
• Repurchased face value of $95 million of 2nd Lien Notes
and $48 million of 2024 Senior Notes in the second
quarter for $118 million in cash
• Purchased LIBOR interest caps which cap a notional $1.3B
of floating rate debt at one-month LIBOR of 2.75% through
May, 2021
![Page 17: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 17
2Q18 Guidance
Anticipated Realizations Against the Prevailing Index Prices for 3Q18
Oil 95% to 100% of Brent
NGLs 55% to 60% of Brent
Natural Gas 100% to 110% of NYMEX
Production, Capital and Income Statement Guidance
Production* 134 to 138 Mboe/d
Capital $180 to $200 million
Production Costs* $18.60 to $20.10 per Boe
Adjusted G&A* $6.60 to $6.90 per Boe
DD&A* $10.05 to $10.35 per Boe
Taxes other than on income $42 to $46 million
Exploration expense $6 to $10 million
Interest expense $94 to $98 million
Cash interest $66 to $70 million
Income tax expense rate 0%
Cash tax rate 0%
* Based on average Q2 2018 Brent of $75.
![Page 18: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 18
3Q
2018
4Q
2018
1Q
2019
2Q
2019
3Q
2019
4Q
2019
FY
2020
FY
2021
Sold Calls Barrels per Day 6,100 16,100 16,100 6,000 1,000 1,000 500 -
Weighted Average
Ceiling Price per Barrel$60.24 $58.91 $65.75 $67.01 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 -
Purchased Calls Barrels per Day - - 2,000 - - - - -
Weighted Average
Ceiling Price per Barrel- - $71.00 - - - - -
Purchased Puts Barrels per Day 6,900 1,900 34,800 36,700 31,700 21,600 1,500 600
Weighted Average
Floor Price per Barrel$61.31 $51.70 $62.77 $67.40 $70.50 $73.09 $47.97 $45.00
Sold Puts Barrels per Day 24,000 19,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 - -
Weighted Average
Floor Price per Barrel$46.04 $45.00 $50.71 $55.00 $56.67 $60.00 - -
Swaps Barrels per Day 48,000 29,000 7,000 - - - - -
Weighted Average
Price per Barrel$60.35 $60.50 $67.71 - - - - -
Percentage of 2Q 2018
Oil Production Hedged66% 37% 50% 44% 38% 26% 2% 1%
Opportunistically Built Oil Hedge Portfolio
As of 7/10/2018, assumes counterparty options are not exercised. Certain of our counterparties have options to increase swap volumes at weighted average
prices between $60 and $70 Brent. For potential volume changes and further details please see Attachment 8 of our Earnings Release.
We target hedges
on 50% of crude
oil production
Strategy Protect cash flow, operating margins
and capital investment program
![Page 19: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 19
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2Q15 Debt Exchange for2L
Open MarketPurchases
Equity for DebtExchange
Cash Tender forUnsecureds
Cash & WorkingCapital
2Q18
Tota
l Deb
t ($
MM
)Significant Reduction in Total Debt from Post-Spin Peak
Total
Total Debt Reduction$535
million
$298
million
$102
million
$625
million
$130
million$1,690 million
1 Represents mid-second quarter 2015 peak debt.
-
Chose options to maximize deleveraging and minimize recurring cost to the income statement on a per share basis.
Continue to seek opportunistic transactions that reduce overall debt.
5,075
2018 Debt
Repurchases
$145MM6,7651
![Page 20: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 20
History of Proactive Strategic Decisions
Swift, decisive actions through the commodity downturn have positioned CRC for growth. Proactive discussions with
lenders and solid asset base provide a path to recovery and an actionable inventory.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
07/20/14 11/20/14 03/20/15 07/20/15 11/20/15 03/20/16 07/20/16 11/20/16 03/20/17 07/20/17 11/20/17 03/20/18 07/20/18
CR
C D
rilli
ng
Rig
Co
un
t
Bre
nt
Cru
de
Oil
Pri
ce (
$/B
bl)
Oil Price
CRC Rig Count
1. Cut Rig Count/Began Hedging 4. Deleveraging Transactions
2. Cut 2015 Capital Budget 5. Increasing Activity
3. Bank Amendments 6. JV Transactions
2
1
5
3Under
OXY
6
SPIN-OFF
3
3
33
3
44
4
4
6
63
4
5
![Page 21: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 21
PDP Value
Proved Value
Unproved4
$0
$4
$8
$12
$16
$20
$24
$28
$65 Brent $75 Brent $85 Brent
($B
illio
n)
Elk Hills Acquisition Enhances NAV Above EV
Current EV of
$7.8 Bn5
Infrastructure2
Surface & Minerals3
1-5 See endnotes in the Appendix.
See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for important information about 3P reserves and other hydrocarbon quantities.
1
1
![Page 22: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 22
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2017 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
$M
M
The Case for CRC: Investment Thesis Overview
Industry
leading base
decline rate
Integrated and
complementary
infrastructure
Maintain
Production
Production and
Cash Flow
Growth
Production Innovation Deep Inventory
Investment Case for CRC
World-class assets
with significant
inventory
Resilient model that
preserves optionality
and protects
downside
Focused on value
and poised for
growth
Moved from defense to offense
Why Own CRC Now
Competitive Advantages
Disciplined portfolio management Potential for Adj. EBITDAX growth*
Clear runway and
available cash
-2017 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
*See Slide 10 for additional information regarding Adjusted EBITDAX Growth planning scenarios.
![Page 23: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Appendix
![Page 24: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 24
Accelerating Value and Derisking Inventory through JVs
Highlights:
• Up to $300MM
o Current commitment of $140MM
• DrillCo type structure where Investor
funds 100% of project capital for 90% WI,
with CRC carried on its 10% WI
o CRC interest reverts to 75% after
target IRR is achieved
o CRC retains early termination
options
• Focus on four fields within the San
Joaquin Basin
o Kern Front, Mt. Poso, Pleito Ranch,
Wheeler Ridge
• CRC operates all wells
Highlights:
• Up to $250MM over ~2 years
o Three tranches of $50MM
o Total of $150MM funded
• Investor funds 100% of project capital in
exchange for a net profits interest (NPI)
o Investor NPI interest reverts to CRC
after low teens target IRR
o CRC retains early termination
options
• Current focus is in the San Joaquin and
Los Angeles Basin
• CRC operates all wells
![Page 25: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 25
-
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
7,000.00
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 101105109113117JV Share Typical E&P Share
Typical Industry JV Structure
• Based on recent industry JV deals, a typical deal structure is
o Partner pays 80-100% Capital
o Receives 80-100% Working Interest
o Typical hurdle rate:o 10% - 20% IRR
o Partner’s working interest once hurdle rate is achieved:o 5% - 25%
Hurdle Rate
Reached
Pro
du
cti
on
Time
![Page 26: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 26
Strategic Partner Alignment
Summary of Deal
Partner ▪ Affiliate of Ares Management (Ares)
Contributed
Assets▪ Elk Hills power plant, gas processing assets and related non-borrowing base
infrastructure currently owned by CRC
Midstream JV
Capitalization
▪ Class A common interests (voting) owned 50% by Ares and 50% by California
Resources Elk Hills (CREH)
▪ Class B preferred interests (“Preferred”) owned 100% by Ares
▪ Class C common interests (distributing) owned 95.25% by CREH and 4.75% by Ares
Distribution
to Partners
▪ Preferred interests to receive distributions of 13.5% per annum on the $750 MM
contributed amount
▪ 9.5% cash pay and 4.0% PIK to be deferred for the first three years
▪ Deferred distributions are interest bearing and repaid over two years following the
deferral period
▪ Remaining cash after Preferred distributions to be distributed pro rata to Class C
interests
Exit
Provisions
▪ Prior to end of 5 or 7.5 years, CRC may redeem Preferred at variable amounts that
include make whole premiums
▪ At end of 5 years, CRC may elect to either redeem or extend to 7.5 years
▪ At 7.5 years, if not redeemed by CRC, Preferred can monetize the JV
Board▪ Board of Managers consists of three CRC representatives and three representatives
from Ares
![Page 27: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 27
Wilmington Field – Production Sharing Contracts
• Over 90% of CRC’s Long Beach production is covered under Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) with the State and the City of Long Beach
• CRC’s net production decreases when prices rise and increases when prices decline
• “Base” rate/profit is defined in contracts
• State/City receive most of base profit
• CRC receives remainder
• “Incremental” rate/profit is everything greater than the Base
• Per the provisions of the contract, the Base of the LBU PSC ended in 4Q 2016
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016
Bo
e/d
Base Incremental
LBU PSC
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016B
oe/
d
Base Incremental
Tidelands PSC
Base Profit Split:
4% CRC / 96% State*
Incremental Profit Split:
49% CRC / 51% State*
Base Profit Split:
4% CRC / 96% State*
Incremental Profit Split
49% CRC / 51% State & City*
*Average profit split %.
End of
LBU
Base
First of 3 new
PSC’s executed
![Page 28: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 28
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Realized Price ($/Boe)
Wilmington Production Sharing Contracts
• Over 25% of CRC’s oil production is subject to Production Sharing Contracts
• PSC Mechanics
― CRC pays our partners’ share of the Operating and Capital Cost
― CRC recovers our partners’ portion of the cost in barrels
― CRC receives 45-49% of the gross production as “Profit Barrels”
• As prices rise, fewer barrels are required to recover our partners’ portion of the cost
Effect of Oil Price on Net Production
Higher oil prices result in higher
cash flow, but lower net production
Cost Recovery Bbls
Net Profit Bbls 45-49% of Gross Production
Gross Production
![Page 29: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 29
Value Additive Inventory Growth
• Comprehensive technical review of 40% of CRC’s fields.
• 2017 proved reserves of 618 million BOE (682 million BOE pro forma including the Elk Hills acquisition) and 450 million BOE of probable reserves.
• 119% organic reserve replacement, excluding the effect of price adjustments.
• We added 34 million BOE of proved reserves from extensions and discoveries and 22 million BOE from performance. We were also able to rebook 49 million BOE due to the increase in prices compared to prior years.
• Organic F&D costs excluding price related revisions were $6.82 per BOE and produced a recycle ratio of 2.1x.
• Over 95% of our total proved reserves have been audited by Ryder Scott in the last three years.
3P Reserves Growth Since Spin
58 109 156
768 644 568618
64222 251
202321
340
826
1,129
0
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,750
2,000
2,250
2,500
Spin-off 2015 2016 2017
MM
Bo
e
2017 Unproven
Revisions due to Price since 2014
Est. 2017 Reserves associated with Elk Hills Transaction
2017 Proven
Cumulative Production
>350%
Growth
See the Investor Relations page at www.crc.com for important information about 3P reserves and other hydrocarbon quantities.
![Page 30: SECOND QUARTER 2018 EARNINGS REVIEW · Well Count Avg 30 Day IP Los Angeles Basin San Joaquin Basin 0 25 50 75 100 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 d San Joaquin Los](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052004/6017073ea365d011554d0e54/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
2Q 2018 Earnings | 30
End Notes
From Slide 21
1 Current CRC estimate of reserves value as of December 31, 2017, including reserves acquired in the Elk Hills transaction.
Includes field-level operating expenses and G&A. Assumes $3.00/MMBTU NYMEX.
2 Reflects the value of facilities and midstream assets at 50% of estimated replacement value. This discount is estimated to
exceed the burden on reserves that would be incurred if assets were monetized. Excludes the value of the assets monetized
in the Ares transaction.
3 Surface & Minerals reflect the estimated value of undeveloped surface and minerals held in fee.
4 Unproved inventory comprises risked probable and possible reserves and contingent and prospective resources. Contingent
and prospective resources consist of volumes identified through life-of-field planning efforts to date.
5 Calculated using June 30, 2018 debt at par and a market cap as of 7/24/2018. Includes mezzanine equity and non-
controlling interest equity.
Value Creation Index (VCI) Note: VCI is calculated by dividing the net present value of the project’s expected pre-tax cash flow over
its life by the net present value of project investments, each using a 10% discount rate.