Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers...

21
Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law

Transcript of Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers...

Page 1: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Search engines and copyrightCardozo 10 Sep 2007

Jon BingNorwegian Research Center for Computers and Law

Page 2: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

First search engine 1995

Page 3: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Another search enginge

Page 4: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Basic information system

Page 5: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Functions of an information system

1. Search function – index

2. Relevance assessment – KWIC, abstract

3. Source function – relative to requirement of domain: For law, authentic document

Page 6: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Outline search engine

Page 7: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Search request – example

Page 8: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Retrieval

Data base

Matching alphabetical file

Search term

Retrieved documents

Problem

Relevance assessment

User

Information system

IndexAddress of term

D/P/S/W

Page 9: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Key-word in context (KWIC)”Snippets” -- Relevance

function for texts

Page 10: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Thumbnails – relevance function for images

Page 12: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Hyperlinks

Link to original site Link to snapshot stored by engine

Page 13: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Possible copyright issues

Page 14: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Copy on which indexing is based

1.Is the extract from the site a ”copy”?2.Importance of robot.txt or similar

commands?User-agent: macrobotDisallow: cat.htm

Page 15: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Copy retained (”cached”)

1. Cached copy relevant in copyright terms2. Is the two different aspects of cached copies relevant for discussion?3. Use for relevance function necessary – included implicit consent4. Use as alternative to original moral rights or competition5. Should rights holder be required to govern situation by metatags or

otherwise

Page 16: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Inverted file: reproduction?

Index file and addresses (”inverted file”) have sufficient information to re-create a reprodction of the original text – relevant legal issue?

Page 17: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Hyperlinks

Link to original site

Link to snapshot stored by engine

Is link to original site an example of ”making the work” available to the public?

Page 18: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Snippet

Link to original site Link to snapshot stored by engine

1. Is snippet a ”citation”?2. Is snippet a reproduction original work?3. Is snippet included implicit consent?

Page 19: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Thumbnails

1. Is thumbnail a ”citation”?2. Is thumbnail a reproduction original work?3. Is thumbnail included implicit consent?

Page 20: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Three possible alternatives

1. Extend rights holder control through formalised statements (”robot.txt”)

2. Rely on implied consent (or fair use)3. Legislative solution

Page 21: Search engines and copyright Cardozo 10 Sep 2007 Jon Bing Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law.

Legislative solution

1. Permit reproduction for indexing2. Permit caching for providing of

snippets only (and low resolution thumbnails)

3. Authorise rights holder controls through formalised statements (like robot.txt or metatags)

4. Sanction lack of compliance with such statements when valid