SEA at Level of Sectoral Reforms and Regional Plans: Case Studies of Colombia Juan David Quintero...
-
Upload
ralph-simmons -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of SEA at Level of Sectoral Reforms and Regional Plans: Case Studies of Colombia Juan David Quintero...
SEA at Level of Sectoral Reforms and Regional Plans:
Case Studies of Colombia
Juan David Quintero
The World Bank
Case Study #1: SEA for the Water and
Sanitation Sector (W&S) Program in Colombia
World Bank LoanMinistry of Development, Colombia
SEA process identified 3 priority environmental issues for the water & sanitation sector in the country:
1. Environmental pollution
2. Inefficiency in water use
3. Urban and rural impacts from construction of water systems
Economic Externalities from Environmental Pollution
(affect many economic and social sectors)
Public health Recreation Agricultural and
industrial production Natural ecosystems
Incidence of Diarrhea and Enteritis
in Children under 5 Years(Colombia, 1990–1997)
Annual Cost: US$315 to $400 milion dollars
87,8
110,2116,0
104,1111,4112,2114,1113,5
020406080100120
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Rat
e x
1.00
0 In
hab
.
Water-borne Diseases:Lack of potable water, bacterial pollution, and
inadequate hygiene habits are associated with water-borne diseases.
Water Inefficiency:A Major Issue for the Sector
Environmental, social, and economic cost for larger and more remote supply infrastructure
Losses and unaccounted-for water (UFW) in the production systems was 45% on average, 86% of annual income in 16 main cities
UFW Losses reached US$ 370 million for 16 main cities
Wasteful water use habits and lack of awareness in users
Lack of micro-metering
Rural and Urban Impacts(due to inadequate construction practices in the
sector)
Noise, dust, and construction waste pollution
Aesthetic and economic impacts on streets
Impacts on ecosystems for water projects
SEA Findings:Environmental regulations impose important restrictions on the development of the W&S
sector.
Sectoral environmental capacity is weak Unclear authority and accountability line Overlap of functions: environmental,
health, development ministries Control and enforcement functions:
unclear Nonexistent mechanisms for institutional
and inter-regional coordination
SEA Findings (Cont’d):The W&S sector is characterized by an early-
stage regulatory framework.
Uncertainty of a water model applied without any attention to local needs
Impossibility of municipalities to assume water service and sanitation responsibilities
Over-concentration of regulators in the sector
Marginal attention to environmental concerns
SEA Findings (Cont’d):Environmental policies for the sector were found
to be inefficient or outdated, mainly:
Efficient water use Service reliability Appropriate technologies Economic value of water Wastewater pollution
taxes
SEA: Strategic Options
Priority: service coverage Sectoral strengthening includes public
and private sector companies Using economic instruments to promote
and adopt water efficient technologies Organizational strengthening should
promote the role of the state as regulator and promote private sector participation
Sectoral environmental guidelines are needed
SEA Action Plan:Consolidating Sector Reform
Improvement/modifications in environmental regulations
Adjustment in EIA licensing processes and community participation
Clear definition of environmental responsibilities for water concessions
Sectoral guidelines for design, construction and operation of W&S systems
Institutional strengthening
SEA Action Plan:Defining clear and stable rules of the
game.
Coverage and service standards for water and sewage collection and treatment
Water source conservation Mechanisms to allocate water rights Rational water use Potable water quality Community participation, hand-
washing promotion
Case Study #2Energy Sector in Colombia
SEA for the energy sector was key for designing a new model for system expansion.
The model includes liabilities and externalities.
Traditional Model for Electric Sector Planning
FINANCIAL AND
PRODUCTION COSTS
Ccap + Cfix + Cvar
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN
AND TARIFFSr (Ccap - Dep)/Even + (Cfix + Cvar)Evend
INCOME AND
PROFITS
COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE
OPTIONS
DEMAND PROJECTION
EXPANSION PLAN
Traditional Mechanisms for Incorporating Environmental
Concerns in Energy Management in Colombia
Over 50% of environmental impacts are associated with the energy sector
• Air Pollution: CO, NOx, SOx,• Water Pollution: PCBs, T. • Global change: CO2, O3
Reservoir siltation Over 50% of environmental licenses
issued are within the energy sector
New Alternative Model for Energy Planning
ALTERNATIVES FOR DEMAND SIDE MANAGENENT
EXPANSION PLAN
COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
DEMAND PROJECTION PRODUCTION
COSTS
RATE OF RETURN, RATES, AND INCENTIVES
INCOME +
PERFORMANCE
FEEDBACK OF PRICES AND INCENTIVES TO CONSUMERS
The Case of a Hydroelectric Project
Old and new way to estimate value
Firm Energy 1175 GWH
Spot Market Price (1999) 1.75 ctvs/KWH
NPV = US$ 148.5 mill.IRR = 14%
NPV = US$ 206.1 mill. IRR = 10%
IncomeNPV between US$ 148.5 - 206.1 mill.
LiabilitiesNPV= US$ 105 mill.
Administration of LiabilitiesNPV= US$ 8.4 mill.
O&MNPV= US$ 38.5 mill.
Environmental Liabilities in Estimating Electric Companies’
Worth Estimated Value =
US$ 1 mill. Operational
Profits: US$ 2.85 mill./year
Discount Rate = 12%
Net Present Value = US$ 23.75 mill.
Electric company has significant numer of transformers with PCB’s
Number of Transformers = 22,000
Polluted Transformers = 11,000
Volume of mineral oil in each transformer = 70 liters
Real Cost Effective Value of the Electric Company After Discounting Environmental
Liabilities Net Present Value Income
= US $ 23.75 million NPV for Management of
Liabilities Associated with PCB’s = US $ 16.85 million
Real Value = US $ 6.90 million
Case Study #3:Regional Transportation
Planin Mompox
GoC proposed for Bank financing a major national road link going through the Mompox Region in order to jumpstart development
Complex institutional arrangement: confluence of 5 jurisdictions
Violence: a major focal point for insurgency Mompox: major, most important wetland
ecosystem in the country. Also, municipal capital is a World Heritage Site
Poor communities, isolated in “island” formation, subject annual flooding
Mompox in Colombia
Images of Mompox
SEA was based on:
Stakeholder identification: poor communities, landowners, NGOs, regional and local institutions
Participatory priority-definition exercises at the community level
Identification of inter-linkages: physical-biological-social-economic-cultural
SEA Main Findings
Land transport not a major priority for the local communities
Land tenure identified as a major constraint to development
Frail ecosystems being affected by existing roads and encroachment by landowners
Connection to mainland could endanger cultural resources
Fragmented institutional coordination
SEA Strategic Options
Connect island to mainland? Rural land transport vs.
improvement in river transport? Protecting natural ecosystems
when most land is in private lands?
Flood control vs. flood protection?
SEA Action Plan
Change the road link project to a regional development plan based on land tenure security and community driven development
Design and provide a mechanism and incentives to create protected areas in private lands
Include improved river transportation at the local level, including boat landings
Ensure municipal strengthening to prevent loss of cultural assets
Benefits from SEA in Mompox
Completely changed project strategy and development approach
Identified real priorities for the poor communities in the Region
Identified natural habitat and cultural property risks and needs
Established a precedent in the country for road development and rural transportation policy
Lessons Learned Lessons Learned from the Colombia from the Colombia
Case StudiesCase Studies
Strategic EAs for Policies and Plans Have evolved in Colombia during the
last decade Sectoral and/or regional EAS have been
carried out before defining national and regional priorities.
SEA processes have strengthened constitutional and regulatory frameworks.
SEAs have broadened the analysis of programs, institutions, organizations and linkages between environment, economic growth and poverty alleviation.
SEAs have placed environmental issues at the core of regional planning efforts and sectoral reform design and implementation.
Seas Have Created Additional Opportunities in
Colombia Promotion of interaction and inter-institutional coordination (development agencies and environment)
Have raised awareness about the linkages between economic development and environment
Improved screening of sectoral/regional programs before decisions on implementation are taken
Helped focus discussion on strategic decisions at the policy level rather than project specific impacts
Identification of institutional strengthening needs Increased capacity for community consultation
Yet, SEAs in Colombia Still Face Challenges…
Unsystematic decision making procedures
Program scoping Inter-institutional coordination
mechanisms Information/analytical base Project-specific EIA culture difficult
to break Public consultation mechanisms
Action Plans:Key for implementation of SEA
recommendations
Explore demand-side management options (energy efficiency, micro-metering in water)
Promote fiscal measures: tolls, pollution taxes
Non-structural measures: land use planning, community participation in decision making
Set up continuous improvement processes through strong institutions