SDO/HMI Preliminary Design Review
-
Upload
garrison-burke -
Category
Documents
-
view
58 -
download
3
description
Transcript of SDO/HMI Preliminary Design Review
Introduction and agenda Page 1HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
SDO/HMI Preliminary Design Review
Solar Dynamics Observatory
Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
Preliminary Design Review
Stanford University and Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory18-19 November 2003
Introduction and agenda Page 2HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
HMI PDR Logistics and Agenda Review
Larry Springer
HMI Program Manager
650-354-5793
HMI00384
Introduction and agenda Page 3HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Agenda Day 1
Time Topic Presenter Duration
8:30 Coffee & Continental Breakfast 30 min9:00 Welcome & Logistics & Agenda Review Larry Springer 10 min9:10 Introduction Tom Cygnarowicz 5 min9:15 Investigation Overview Philip Scherrer 20 min9:35 Requirements Rock Bush 10 min9:45 Instrument Overview Larry Springer 20 min
10:05 Instrument Performance Requirements Jesper Schou 20 min10:25 S/C Accommodation & Resources Brock Carpenter 20 min10:45 Optics Alan Title 30 min11:15 Filter Systems 60 min
Front Window, Blocking Filter and Lyot Richard Shine
Michelson Inteferometers Rock Bush
12:15 Lunch1:15 Mechanical (OP structure, telescope, FPA) Barbara Fischer 70 min2:25 Thermal Design 40 min
Overall and Front Window Rose Navarro
Precision Oven Carl Yanari
3:05 Mechanisms David Akin 70 min4:15 Wrap-up and plan for tomorrow
Introduction and agenda Page 4HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Agenda Day 2
9:00 CCD Camera Systems Overview Jake Wolfson 10 min CCD Sensors Gein Tsang 30 min CEB (Camera Electronics Box) Nick Waltham 40 min
10:20 Electronics Russ Lindgren 75 min11:35 Image Stabilization System Chris Edwards 30 min12:05 Lunch
1:05 Flight Software Jerry Drake 40 min1:45 Integration & Test (w/GSE/Verification) Michael Levay 45 min2:30 Calibration Jesper Schou 15 min2:45 Mission Assurance Ed McFeaters 60 min
Quality Assurance and InspectionSoftware Quality AssuranceMaterials and ProcessesSafetyEEE Parts
3:25 Reliability Dale Wolfe 10 min3:35 Contamination Control Syndie Meyer 10 min3:45 Ground System Jim Aloise 20 min4:05 Mission Operations Rock Bush 10 min4:15 Review Team Caucus 15 min4:30 Debrief and Wrap-up 10 min
Introduction and agenda Page 5HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Acronym List (1/4)
ABPL As-Built Parts List
ABML As-Built Materials List ANSI American National Standards Institute
ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuits
ASQ American Society for Quality
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BB Ball Bearing BGA Ball Grid Array BOL Beginning of Life CA Corrective Action
CAGE Commercial and Government Entity Code
CCB Configuration Control Board
CCP Contamination Control Plan
CDR Critical Design Review
CIL Critical Items List
CM Configuration Management CPT Comprehensive Performance Test
CVCM Collectable Volatile Condensable Materials
DoD Department of Defense
DPA Destructive Physical Analysis
EDU Engineering Development Unit
EEE Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical
ELV Expendable Launch Vehicle
EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility
EMI Electromagnetic Interference
ESD Electrostatic Discharge
Introduction and agenda Page 6HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Acronym List (2/4)
FMEA Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
FOR Flight Operations Review
FRB Failure Review Board
FTA Fault Tree Analysis
FRR Flight Readiness Review
GEVS General Environmental Verification Specification
GEVS-SE General Environmental Verification Specification for STS & ELV Payloads, Subsystems, and Components
GFE Government Furnished Equipment
GIDEP Government Industry Data Exchange Program
GSE Ground Support Equipment
GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center
I&T Integration and Test
ISO International Standards Organization
IV&V Independent Verification and Validation
LRR Launch Readiness Review
LWS Living With a Star
MA Mission Assurance MAR Mission Assurance Requirements
MCP Multi-Chip Module
MOR Mission Operations Review
MPCB Materials & Processes Control Board
MRB Material Review Board
MRR Mission Readiness Review
MUA Materials Usage Agreement
Introduction and agenda Page 7HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Acronym List (3/4)
NAS NASA Assurance Standard
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NHB NASA Handbook
OSSMA Office of Systems Safety and Mission Assurance
PA Product Assurance or Performance Assurance
PAIP Performance Assurance Implementation Plan
PAPL Project Approved Parts List
PCB Parts Control Board
PDR Preliminary Design Review
PER Pre-Environmental Review
PIL Parts Identification List
PIND Particle Impact Noise Detection
PM Program Manger
PPL Preferred Parts List
PRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment
PSR Pre-Shipment Review
PWB Printed Wiring Board
QCM Quartz Crystal Microbalance
QE Quality Engineer or Quality Engineering QMS Quality Management System
Introduction and agenda Page 8HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
Acronym List (4/4)
SAM Systems Assurance Manager SCC Stress Corrosion Cracking
SCM Software Configuration Management
SOW Statement of Work
SQE Software Quality Engineer
SQMS Software Quality Management System
SMA Safety and Mission Assurance
SRO Systems Review Office
SRR Software Requirements Review
SSP System Safety Plan
TML Total Mass Loss
TRR Test Readiness Review
V&V Verification and Validation
Introduction and agenda Page 9HMI Preliminary Design Review – Nov. 18 &19, 2003
ITAR Considerations
• The HMI PDR Package has been reviewed with the LMATC Export Control Director to determine that it is not an ITAR controlled document.
• It is the opinion of the LMATC Export Control Director that ITAR and the provisos of the HMI TAA prevent us from exporting information about other programs that are regulated by ITAR
• Therefore the names and acronyms from previous programs covered by ITAR have been replaced by generic references (ie. Program A)
• THE Review Panel will be provided with a cross reference.
• Programs like MDI and TRACE which were developed prior to ITAR are not restricted.
• Because the audience of this review includes non US persons, who are members of the HMI team, it may be necessary to defer the answers to detailed technical questions that would include information considered technical data or defense service by ITAR.