SDMS DocID 568265 ALLIANCEsemspub.epa.gov/work/01/568265.pdfprovided in the Weekly Field Activities...
Transcript of SDMS DocID 568265 ALLIANCEsemspub.epa.gov/work/01/568265.pdfprovided in the Weekly Field Activities...
r
SDMS DocID 568265
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
DATE March 4 1987
MEMO TO M lmat EPA-Silresim ProjectWlanager
FROM Benjregmin Rice Alliance-Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT DATA VALIDATION OF PHASE TWO TEST PIT SAMPLES - CASE 6572
On November 12 and 13 1986 test pitting was conducted on the Silresim site cap in an effort to locate and identify buried objects detected by earlier geophysical investigations EPA requested that Alliance Technologies collect soil samples during the test pitting and submit samples for complete Hazardous Substance List (full HSL) analysis
A total of nine samples were collected from seven test pits under the direction of EPAs Project Manager at the site (see test pit locations map shyAttachment No 1) An additional field blank sample was submitted for laboratory quality assurance purposes Details of the actual sampling are provided in the Weekly Field Activities Report (see Attachment No 2)
All samples were shipped to the appropriate laboratories for analysis on November 13 1986 under Case No 6572s Organic analyses were conducted by York Laboratories of Monroe Connecticut arid inorganic analyses were performed byNanco Laboratory of Hopewell Junction New York A cross reference table of Organic (OTR) and Inorganic Traffic Report (ITR) numbers with sample locations is provided in Attachment No 3
Alliance Technologies has also been requested by EPA to perform the quality assurance validation on data from both CLP laboratories for the subject case The results of the organic and inorganic data validation process are providedin Attachments Nos 4 and 5 respectively Organic and inorganic compoundsdetected in individual samples from the test pits have been summarized in the tables provided in Attachment No 6
If you have any questions or comments please contact me at yourconvenience
Attachments
O
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
v
i
ALLIANCE Attachment No 2Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-775-5441 DATE December 1 1986
MEMO TO Jlt lnrat EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Benjamin Rice Alliance- Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT WEEKLY OVERSIGHT REPORT - NOVEMBER 10 THROUGH NOVEMBER 14 1986
Attached are my daily oversight reports for the week of November 10th covering the two days of test pitting on the Silresim site (November 12 and November 13) A total of nine soil samples (one a duplicate) plus one VOA blank were collected during the test pitting process All were shipped to tl selected CLP labs for full HSL analysis on November 13th
Details of observations for each day are included in the attached DailyOversight Reports as well as the Daily Field Log Book maintained by Allian for the Silresim site If you have any questions or comments please contac
me at your convenience
Attachments
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5441 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO Joel^almaS EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Binjgfflin Rice Alliance-Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 12 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 1
Personnel present at the site included the following Joel Balmat (EPA)Nancy Bettinger (DEQE) Ben Rice (Alliance) David Sample Rick Chase Mike Shaw and Claire Quadri (GZA) and two crew members (Enpro) to operate the backhoe Planned activities for the day included the initiation of the test pitting program on the Silresim cap for the six buried objects identified in the Phase II Sampling Plan The buried objects identified included numbers
- 1 4 5 6 8 and 9
At approximately 900am the removal of cap material down to the originalSilresim surface began at each of the test pit (TP) locations The material removed from most of the TPs consisted of clay used in construction of the capand one inch crushed stone In several of the pits fill material was encountered above the crushed stone
The following table lists the TPs objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill mat none and crushed stone
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4 S-l
and pipe
TP4b reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
TP8 Silresim surface and section of pipe
20ft clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
none
TP9 concrete slab 20ft clay none
TP5 PVC vent pipe 30ft clay fill matcrushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark stained soil TP-5 S-l 380ppm head space
underground tank 65ft dark soil and greysilty sand
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contaminationeffecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay Test pit 4a was back filled at the end of the day test pit 5 was left open and covered with the plastic sheeting GZA personnel attemptedto locate a port in which to collect a sample from the underground tank in test pit 5 level B protection was recommended by the EPA representative and was used while in the test pit
I left the site with the two samples TP-4 S-l and TP-5 S-l at 415pm
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
i
ALLIANCE Attachment No 2Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-775-5441 DATE December 1 1986
MEMO TO Jlt lnrat EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Benjamin Rice Alliance- Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT WEEKLY OVERSIGHT REPORT - NOVEMBER 10 THROUGH NOVEMBER 14 1986
Attached are my daily oversight reports for the week of November 10th covering the two days of test pitting on the Silresim site (November 12 and November 13) A total of nine soil samples (one a duplicate) plus one VOA blank were collected during the test pitting process All were shipped to tl selected CLP labs for full HSL analysis on November 13th
Details of observations for each day are included in the attached DailyOversight Reports as well as the Daily Field Log Book maintained by Allian for the Silresim site If you have any questions or comments please contac
me at your convenience
Attachments
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5441 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO Joel^almaS EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Binjgfflin Rice Alliance-Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 12 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 1
Personnel present at the site included the following Joel Balmat (EPA)Nancy Bettinger (DEQE) Ben Rice (Alliance) David Sample Rick Chase Mike Shaw and Claire Quadri (GZA) and two crew members (Enpro) to operate the backhoe Planned activities for the day included the initiation of the test pitting program on the Silresim cap for the six buried objects identified in the Phase II Sampling Plan The buried objects identified included numbers
- 1 4 5 6 8 and 9
At approximately 900am the removal of cap material down to the originalSilresim surface began at each of the test pit (TP) locations The material removed from most of the TPs consisted of clay used in construction of the capand one inch crushed stone In several of the pits fill material was encountered above the crushed stone
The following table lists the TPs objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill mat none and crushed stone
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4 S-l
and pipe
TP4b reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
TP8 Silresim surface and section of pipe
20ft clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
none
TP9 concrete slab 20ft clay none
TP5 PVC vent pipe 30ft clay fill matcrushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark stained soil TP-5 S-l 380ppm head space
underground tank 65ft dark soil and greysilty sand
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contaminationeffecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay Test pit 4a was back filled at the end of the day test pit 5 was left open and covered with the plastic sheeting GZA personnel attemptedto locate a port in which to collect a sample from the underground tank in test pit 5 level B protection was recommended by the EPA representative and was used while in the test pit
I left the site with the two samples TP-4 S-l and TP-5 S-l at 415pm
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
ALLIANCE Attachment No 2Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-775-5441 DATE December 1 1986
MEMO TO Jlt lnrat EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Benjamin Rice Alliance- Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT WEEKLY OVERSIGHT REPORT - NOVEMBER 10 THROUGH NOVEMBER 14 1986
Attached are my daily oversight reports for the week of November 10th covering the two days of test pitting on the Silresim site (November 12 and November 13) A total of nine soil samples (one a duplicate) plus one VOA blank were collected during the test pitting process All were shipped to tl selected CLP labs for full HSL analysis on November 13th
Details of observations for each day are included in the attached DailyOversight Reports as well as the Daily Field Log Book maintained by Allian for the Silresim site If you have any questions or comments please contac
me at your convenience
Attachments
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5441 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO Joel^almaS EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Binjgfflin Rice Alliance-Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 12 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 1
Personnel present at the site included the following Joel Balmat (EPA)Nancy Bettinger (DEQE) Ben Rice (Alliance) David Sample Rick Chase Mike Shaw and Claire Quadri (GZA) and two crew members (Enpro) to operate the backhoe Planned activities for the day included the initiation of the test pitting program on the Silresim cap for the six buried objects identified in the Phase II Sampling Plan The buried objects identified included numbers
- 1 4 5 6 8 and 9
At approximately 900am the removal of cap material down to the originalSilresim surface began at each of the test pit (TP) locations The material removed from most of the TPs consisted of clay used in construction of the capand one inch crushed stone In several of the pits fill material was encountered above the crushed stone
The following table lists the TPs objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill mat none and crushed stone
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4 S-l
and pipe
TP4b reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
TP8 Silresim surface and section of pipe
20ft clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
none
TP9 concrete slab 20ft clay none
TP5 PVC vent pipe 30ft clay fill matcrushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark stained soil TP-5 S-l 380ppm head space
underground tank 65ft dark soil and greysilty sand
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contaminationeffecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay Test pit 4a was back filled at the end of the day test pit 5 was left open and covered with the plastic sheeting GZA personnel attemptedto locate a port in which to collect a sample from the underground tank in test pit 5 level B protection was recommended by the EPA representative and was used while in the test pit
I left the site with the two samples TP-4 S-l and TP-5 S-l at 415pm
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5441 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO Joel^almaS EPA-Silresim Project Manager
FROM Binjgfflin Rice Alliance-Silresim Project Manager
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 12 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 1
Personnel present at the site included the following Joel Balmat (EPA)Nancy Bettinger (DEQE) Ben Rice (Alliance) David Sample Rick Chase Mike Shaw and Claire Quadri (GZA) and two crew members (Enpro) to operate the backhoe Planned activities for the day included the initiation of the test pitting program on the Silresim cap for the six buried objects identified in the Phase II Sampling Plan The buried objects identified included numbers
- 1 4 5 6 8 and 9
At approximately 900am the removal of cap material down to the originalSilresim surface began at each of the test pit (TP) locations The material removed from most of the TPs consisted of clay used in construction of the capand one inch crushed stone In several of the pits fill material was encountered above the crushed stone
The following table lists the TPs objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill mat none and crushed stone
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4 S-l
and pipe
TP4b reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
TP8 Silresim surface and section of pipe
20ft clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
none
TP9 concrete slab 20ft clay none
TP5 PVC vent pipe 30ft clay fill matcrushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark stained soil TP-5 S-l 380ppm head space
underground tank 65ft dark soil and greysilty sand
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contaminationeffecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay Test pit 4a was back filled at the end of the day test pit 5 was left open and covered with the plastic sheeting GZA personnel attemptedto locate a port in which to collect a sample from the underground tank in test pit 5 level B protection was recommended by the EPA representative and was used while in the test pit
I left the site with the two samples TP-4 S-l and TP-5 S-l at 415pm
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
TP5 PVC vent pipe 30ft clay fill matcrushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark stained soil TP-5 S-l 380ppm head space
underground tank 65ft dark soil and greysilty sand
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contaminationeffecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay Test pit 4a was back filled at the end of the day test pit 5 was left open and covered with the plastic sheeting GZA personnel attemptedto locate a port in which to collect a sample from the underground tank in test pit 5 level B protection was recommended by the EPA representative and was used while in the test pit
I left the site with the two samples TP-4 S-l and TP-5 S-l at 415pm
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation 213 Burlington Road Bedford MA 01730 617-275-5444 DATE November 261986
MEMO TO JoelB^mi EPA-Silresim Project ManageroelregaImac3 t
FROM Benj Alliance-Silresim Project Managerenjamin Rice
SUBJECT DAILY FIELD OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY FOR NOVEMBER 13 1986 TEST PITTING - DAY 2
At approximately 815am we returned to the test pitting operation on the cap The activities conducted during this day were consistent with those of
1112
The following table summarizes data collected at the site on both 111286and 111386 and lists the test pits (TPs) objects encountered depths and soil types as well as where samples were collected for full HSL analysis
TEST PIT OBJECT ENCOUNTERED DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE COLLECTED
TP1 none 35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 40ft dark soil TP-1 S-l
none 80ft silty sand none
TP4a ground water (cap runoff )
35ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
Silresim surface 50ft dark soil TP-4a S-l
and pipe
TP4bi reinforcement rods and concrete debris
40ft clay fill matand crushed stone
none
pipe debris 45ft dark stained soil l-2ppm
TP-4b S-l
TP6 original Silresim surface
25ft clay and crushed stone
none
none 40ft dark soilsiltysand contact 60ppm
none
buried pipe 35ft dark soil lppm(composite)
TP-6 S-l
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
TP8
TP9
TP5
Silresim surface and section of pipe
more pipe and concrete
red conglomeratematerial
none
concrete slab
solid waste debris
none
none
none
PVC vent pipe
Silresim surface
underground tank
20ft
25ft
40ft
50ft
20ft
40ft
45ft
80ft
100ft
30ft
40ft
65ft
clay and crushed stone - 8ppm
dark soil 40ppm
red-brown siltysand
red-brown siltysand
clay
dark soil - lOppm
silty sand at 70ppm head space
silty sand 70 - 80ppm
silty sand
clay fill matcrushed stone
dark stained soil 380ppm head space
dark soil and graysilty sand
none
none
TP-8 S-l
none
none
TP-9 S-l
none
TP-9 S-2 TP-9 S-3 (dup)
none
none
TP-5 S-l
none
During the entire process DEQE monitored the upwind air qualityimmediately outside the site fence to detect potential background contamination effecting the readings at the test pit
All soils removed from the test pits were screened with an HNucontaminated soil was placed on plastic sheeting to avoid contamination of the surface clay
I left the site with the nine soil samples at 130pm All samples were shipped to the designated CLP labs for full HSL analysis under CASE 6572 on 111386 An additional VOA blank was shipped as a field blank for a total of ten samples for organic analysis and nine for inorganic analysis
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Attachment No 3
SILRESIM TEST PIT SAMPLES
LOCATIONS AND CLP TRAFFIC REPORT NOS
TRAFFIC REPORT
TEST PIT SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) ORGANIC INORGANIC
TP-1 4 AF 786 MAD 766 TP-4N 5 AH 108 MAD 774 TP-4S 45 All 107 MAD 773 TP-5 4 AH 106 MAD 772 TP-6 35 AF 787 MAD 767 TP-8 4 AF 788 MAD 768 TP-9 (1)TP-9 ( 2 )
4 8
AF 790 AF 791
MAD 770 MAD 771
TP-9 (3) AF 789 MAD 769
-3 SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM TEST PIT
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Attachment Nq 4
A ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
TO Ben Rice 19 February 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT Silresim Data Validation Case 6512
Case 6572 from York Laboratories is comprised of 9 medium level soil samplesanalyzed for full HSL organics and one water sample analyzed for volatiles only The samples were collected by Alliance Technologies Corporation on November 13 1986 and are identified by Traffic Report Numbers AF786 AF787AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 AH108 and AH109 The samples were received at York Laboratories on November 14 1986 A Level II validation of this data was conducted by Alliance Technologies Corporation evaluating the following parameters
o Holding times o DFTPP and BFB performance results o Surrogate spike results o Matrix spike results o FieldLab precision evaluation o FieldLab blank analysis results o Detection limit results o Initial and continuing calibration o Data completeness
All information neccessary to conduct this review was present Samples were analyzed within the contractural holding times DFTPP and BFB tuning were performed the results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria
Surrogate spike results were reviewed and found to be acceptable for all volatile and baseneutral and acid extractable compounds The pesticidesurrogate recovery was unacceptable for sample AF790 The sample was reanalyzed and recovery of the surrogate was still outside the contract required recovery range No action is taken on pesticide surrogaterecoveries Matrix spike recoveries were reviewed for all fractions and all samples Sample AF787 was spiked for BNAs and one compoundN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine was recovered just below the contract required recovery range No action was taken on sample results
Laboratory precision was evaluated through review of matrix spike duplicateresults Sample AF786 was spiked in duplicate with volatile organiccompounds The relative percent difference (RPD) was found to be within the established quality control limits Sample AH109 was also spiked with volatile compounds The RPD was outside quality control limits for four of the six compounds The result of the entire fraction for that sample should be considered approximate and all values have been Jd
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Sample AF787 was spiked in duplicate with BNA and pesticide compounds All RPDs of pesticide recoveries were acceptable Two of six RPDs of acid extractable compounds were outside quality control limits In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample should be considered approximate when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established quality control limits The recovered baseneutral compounds did not meet RPD criteria for five of six compounds The baseneutral fraction of sample AF787 has been Jd and results should be considered approximated
Samples AF789 and AF791 are field generated duplicates The RPD for each parameter was calculated and is summarized in the enclosed data review worksheet Advisory criteria are exceeded for volatile compounds No pesticide compounds were identified in either sample which were not detected on the duplicate The concentrations were below the CRDL and were reported as approximate values RPD could not be calculated No action was taken based on field duplicate results The field investigator Mr Benjamin Riceindicated that inconsistencies in the samples were obvious at the time of collection
Results of the laboratory method blanks were reviewed and found to be acceptable Volatiles Blank 1 contained 7ppb 4-Methyl2-pentanone Volatiles Blank 2 contained 9ppb 2-Hexanone As these values are below the contract required detection limit no action is taken on sample results The BNA Blank was found to contain two non-HSL compounds Acetic acid butyl ester at 64000ppb and Phenol26-bis(1l-dimethylethyl)4-methyl at 18000 ppb No action was taken on sample results The Pesticide Blank contained no identifiable contaminants Sample AH109 was submitted to the laboratory as a field blank and was analyzed for volatile organic compounds only None were detected
Detection limits for waters and soils were presented and found to be less than or equal to the contract required detection limit
Initial and continuing calibrations for volatile and semi-volatile analyseswere evaluated on the basis of minimum response factors and percent difference(7raquoD) between response factors The following summarizes actions taken on volatiles results
1 All positive values for 2-Butanone flagged J (or UR for non-detected values) based on response factors of the initial calibration
2 Values for 2-Hexanone in sample AH109 approximate (UJ) based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
3 Values for Methylene chloride should be considered approximate (Jd)in sample AF786 AF787 AF788 AF789 AF790 AF791 AH106 AH107 and AH108 based on RSD of response factors of initial calibration
4 Values for Chloromethane Trans-l3-dichloropropene and Cis-13shydichloropropene should be considered approximate for sample AH109 based on D of response factors in the continuing calibration
5 Values for Acetone Chloromethane Bromomethane and Chloroethane should be considered approximate for samples AF786 through AF791 and AH106 through 108 based on D of response factors in the continuingcalibration
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
The following summarizes actions taken on semi-volatile results
1 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 245-Trichlorophenol4-Chlorophenylphenylether and Fluorine should be considered approximate (Jd) for samples AF786 through AF790 based on the 7oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
2 Values for Benzoic acid 4-Nitrophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 24-Dinitrophenol Diethylphthalate 4-ChlorophenylphenyletherFluorine IndenoC123-cd)perylene and Dibenzo(ah)anthracene should be considered approximate for samples AF791 AH106 and AH108 based on the oD of response factors in the continuing calibration
3 Values for 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline DibenzofuranBenzo(ghi)Perylene Benzoic Acid and Hexachlorocyclopentadieneshould be considered approximate for sample AH107 based on 7raquoD of response factors in the continuing calibration
Initial and continuing calibrations for pesticides were evaluated on the basis of the retention time for DDT whieh was found to be greater than 12 minutes as required and the percent breakdown of both DDT and Endrin neither of which exceeded 20 percent Retention time windows were established and standardsample results were found to be within those windows The retention time shift for dibutyl chlorendate was found to be greater than 2 percent in sample AF790 All pesticidePCB results for that sample are considered unusable and the data flagged R Linearity was checked and criteria were not met for DDT on run dates December 5-6 1986 (column 15 SP2250197 SP2401)and December 151986 (column 370 OV-1) All pesticide values for samplesAH106 AH107 and AH108 should be considered approximate (Jd) Calibration was further evaluated by the 7raquoD between calibration factors during a twelve hour anaylsis period Based on the D values for gamma-BHC HeptachlorAldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endosulfan II DDT and Methoxychlor results should be considered approximate for samples AF786 and
AF787
Results of the data validation are presented in the Date Review worksheets enclosed Several discrepancies were discovered between the raw data and the reported data and are summarized below
1 Sample AH106 had incorrect detection limits listed for volatile organics on Form 1 After verifying the correct detection limits with Mr John Culik of York Laboratories the values are summarized in the
worksheets
2 The quant report for volatile organics in Sample AH108 listed Toluene at 47000 mgkg This value was not reported in Form 1 but has been corrected in the enclosed worksheets (after conversation with John
Culik)
3 Sample AH108 GC Chromatograms indicated the presence of Aldrin on both the quantitation and confirmatory runs which was not reported on Form 1 Ms Marsha Cooper of York Laboratories confirmed this as an^ oversight and sent a new Form 1 to me The corrected value for Aldrin has been reported on the enclosed worksheet
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
4 In evaluating the pesticides data the possible presence of PCB (arochor 1242) was noted in samples AH106 AH107 and AF788 with ten to twelve peaks per sample matching retention time of the standards No confirmatory run was performed Ms Cooper indicated that she had re-checked the data and still felt that there were no PCBs presentbut also pointed out that the samples were run at medium level which raised detection limits
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the Alliance Level II validation of
Case 6572 from York Laboratories
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
ccs B Rice N Barmekian
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Project Name ^SifffSiri or Data Review Worksheets TDD No
Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF ORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
received atThe hardcopied (laboratory name) bull L Mpals data packageie assurance and performaiperformance dataRegion I has been reviewed and th6 qualityquality
summarized The data reviewed included
Case No (pb 7 2 SAS No Sampling Date LUAihlt~shyNo of Sample Matrix Fn- Lc Shipping Date
T)~ate Received by La6T
Traffic Report Nos FF amp pound = 7S FF7S FF7rS7^ F 7 rQ- P f~)ri FoF FFOir F)FO9
Blank No Faj Fgt -J -Duplicate Nos bullF 7 X V F F 7 7
Contract No 1- 757Xequipoundes that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by thecontractor to the Regfons EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to~determinethe performance were basecTon an examination of
Holding times FieildLab Precision Evaluation DFTPP and BFB performance results Blank analysis results Surrogate spike results Detection limit results Matrix spike results Initial and Continuing Calibration
Overall comments p JjJ OTJ-XLtv- mdashltgtyp-amp Lq-4-umdashf1 r l Fsfa a j jJ l 1 (A F Fbgt~ V h $ J^-rgtspFi fittF 6 in amp-^FLJA iidAf - f iiAAs bulllaquo
~~7 XTT7TT~ f n ) V L ltFJf F -x V- - f F JFlt F A s F t ^ At -f-J raquo Jj j ltL
Ft f t FFamp C^T-y F AL f -X b ^ ^ c A U-71-J -7 lt SJLA KX CFU J -
Definitions of Qualifiers
A Acceptable data J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due to blank contamination 1 Reject data due to other quality control criteria ND Not detected + Positive compound identification N3 Tentatively identified compound
Reviewer JrJ ^ Date IF ( I S bullx
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
4--
tONCENTRATIONDI INSTRUMENT mdash
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Semivolatile Organic Analysis
Sample IXX
EPA 4E2Ml Afn7 AMlOI AFTil ANKgt1CAS uNumber M$Lf M$kx MWamp^ h- L_ Anl A4 pound 83-32-9 Acimphihtw vyrrxx 9omOLXj Noax u lt3boo poundraquo CCXic fe Q J 51-285 24-0raquoniirophfraquool Q(- onn a 96000 U1 No vfciYpoundC^ APpm u [tfdtf) U Q 000 shy100-02-7 4-Nitrophanol N mou- oaouT POPtG pound- raquobullbullbullgty7 iCYJLlt3 NiWis3 (bull 00() gtbull A (XlO-FS 13264-9 Oibanrolurao 7CjCWfd HA 06003a3000^ 10 COO LA -gt aHOV bull-bullfc CfJfjf-- ]2MAA M P )0 ^ 1 JMW 121-14-2 24-Oiniiroioluana NQ(w lt3 oltiYyengtii NO nroi j 3DconH 114Vfc-J fXXgtClt~l 7Qgt- DViUl i(u00lA ) iAOmdash7
bi^trevt OtXQXi608-20-2 26-Diniiroioluana ciltXAOOLpound aooooM 20(Y)CM 0 ulltbull vO ic 0 1 poundU4L Diathylphihalaia bullnrypua NODOOiAn Noooooz 000oqixj Ayjp CO dbic^cs O-VVOA rkO(XXgtuT84-66-2
7005-72-3 4-Chloropbanyl-phanylaihar MPCXY) uJQAooolp 3OX0O0C OOQOaiA-J gtpoundrjgtjv)tfc 301COAU bullQo vyyx ~j()OOPt-3
OtOOUJ SiOCGOCK5 NOOOP L loiorjabrr mT 9^ KlOOflfl 73 7 Fluflftna aPiPOT 2^ 100-01-6 4-Niiroaniltnlaquo Co 96000 (A 7 ~WQLlt ^ooou OL- O t yy i O
J S34-S2-I 46-0iniiro-2-Maihylphanol amp1 NhkXiQu faonoicM21L 86 306 N Nuroiodipbanvlamioa111 aomoixj AQiWQLL ^O0fgt9U AjtW 9(do0oi sP PC bullgt NO Oexi ltbull
IOI-55-3 4-Bromophanyl-phanylaihar Qpcnou aooooi aofW)U 2) 1 i No(xlt~ No oopiA 118-74-1 Haiachlorobaniana Kcmu 0000 LG aQ(YV^U aoofy^u Ijioo^J JampGC0U 2MLJ-L1 on gto o y^v r 87-86-5 Paniachloropbanol famiu lb ODQLA OOTAa rgty-kA 3Ji U 0 CgtQ-- ytcoQ
Phananihrana iam2u ^ofiry^u I fhr io^ bullS0 0))lt-gtbullSL2LL120-12-7 Anlhracana 9 vW)u Ntacoo c-P OOOcxmk i-bDcraquoym bullNoo a bull Vb-V 3^iOcou
Di-n-Buiylpbihalaia gQjOfiQU nIOOPPU Sal(gigtQ bull ) ~50yJ~ bullnnoou ioO384-74-2 206-44-0 Fluoanihana Naobnujr OOPOU vVP nQOs VFOrr 92-87-5 Bantidina JIB nx sy R N A gt hi O
Pyraoa QPiCOOlsD NO OCX^ joon ca -M 2lZii22_iplusmnL J)x -- bull t--C vltshy129-00-0 AipniiL 85-68-7 Bmylbanrytphihalaia ^QOFnu 30DOOM 30000LA 3o OOO^A dQr ibcgt XVQJX- Q OOOU lt0000 P no PooI
91-94-1 3 3-OichlorobaniiltJina MqOPtOU yocxxnn NOtQQQL ndAONU yldjJ in WMl( u HOCOO A HtJXW 56 55-3 Blaquonia(a1Anihracanlaquo nlOiOaM 9Q0OQW NOdoqo aoooou 90 IOU- 90 Ocn bull0 ccQX
bilt|2-Elhythaayl|Pblhalaia f tOjCMLxNOoontv GOO J- 3oo j bullio N~o viy njOn 90c 9Q) Hgt(A PiS on()f l Chryaaw bo0Q0y QOOOW 00 POOL A hoDQOU n V Arm NDampOOL^ ilu NO MN- HOniYt
117-81-7
UifiUL 117-84-0 Oi-n-OciylPhihalaia ODCOU Oooomn otOOiY)U otQOOO^ r gt001- MdQQU 30000 LA 20599 2 Banto(b|Fluoranibanlaquo ampDpound0_Qk fQQopnoO9gt0onnu ho OftoA VaOOiy pound2iL Dn0ltH^ IMAM No 00 0o 207-089 Banrolth)Fluofanihene bC3|(Ynx^qpoolQ hoooou ICXXNU NO ONi KM)(KMSO-32-B Bamo|a|Pyrane NOjOCyM ^OiODQU fflMby dioL pound1 3A Ooo (- lZ 60 u 193 396 Indanoll23-cdlPyraoa bovinu fyyitO Aqryvxt otOOOCgti-lt OrCbb-u Ootidoi Nobcm 13-70-3 Oibani ah|nilumnlaquo Oiy(YT)U POrVMJ 30000(A OOQiyiU bull3ol(y JC breFo OOGooLa OOoooui
hi|Paryltargta j O-Onnu o(rr7( CCO H rQOX Lv Ai iiL bullDh kcxi OO-lCr OO0PcLraquo]0uono^WiUil I
lt_ PmxOTA iL PuJUO gtbull
fof l ivJC9- - it Nushyi i
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets ~ - bull bull
I HOLDING TIMES
L VOA fractions were analyzed within 7 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
J Samples were extracted within 5 days of receipt (10 days-soil)
C Sample extracts were analyzed within 40 days of extraction
Refer to Result Summary Table for actual dates of receipt and analysis
Action Results of compounds detected in samples not analyzed within the
contract required holding times (CRHT) should be approximated (3d)
The reviewer may reject non-detected compounds in samples _which
were excessively beyond the CRHT (ie 30 days past CRHT)
-Remarks ~P H is l^P ^ jQA
^^c fC-iL cLsXltgt
n DFTPP AND BFB PEFORMANCE RESULTS mdash bull
^ The DFTPP performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
^ The BFB performance results were reviewed and found to be within the specified criteria
The (DFTPPBFB) performance result(s) waswere reviewed and the following abundances were found to fall outside the specified criteria
Required Actual Compound mz Abundance Abundance
Remarks ^PTPP (Tgtr Sgt BF8 ^
L $ju ultJ2^
7 degi I pound Zgt ^
C ^ L i ( I s l A 0 A O f i s t J L ltltrlt
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation ~ ~ Data Review Worksheets -bull mdash
III SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of surrogate compounds with unacceptable recoveries per the total number of surrogates in that fraction
Traffic Report No V O A BN --A Pest
A F l i O mdash
Surrogate Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results J ^ non-detected compounds R 3
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
Surrogate Action should be applied when one VOA or two BN or two A surrogate recoveries do not meet contractual requirements
If surrogate spike recoveries are out of specification on initial analysis but meet criteria on re-analysis report results based on results of re-analysis _Ashy
gtV- A-gt tgt2lt tT
Noe
1 - For samples with surrogate percent recoveries between 10 and the Contract Required Recovery range an evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for a Level I data validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluated under a Level II data validation
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
For any given fraction determine the number of unacceptable recoveries per the total number of matrix spike recoveries in that fraction
Traffic Report No VOA BN A Pest
A f O f ) 1
Matrix Spike Actions Percent Recovery
lt10 10-CRR gtCRR
Positive sample results 3 I 3 3 non-detected compounds R i A i A
CRR - Contract Required Recovery range
In general matrix spike actions should be applied when fifty percent of the matrix spike recoveries per fraction do not meet established advisory limits when the percent recovery does not meet advisory contractual limits for a matrix spike compound in both sets of duplicate spike sample results the results of the compound in the unspiked sample should be qualified
Matrix spikerecoveries not within the advisory contractual limits should be applied only to the sample on which the spike was performed
s0 mdashpmdashfmdash A JQ shy
gt ^ i f o J C 1 Z g
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
V MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS ft ft ampltlaquo OTgt
Soil f t p 7ft 7 Aqueous f t f t (ft
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The established advisory RPD criteria for each matrix spike compound is listed on Form III When the RPD is greater than the advisory contractual limit for a matrix spike compound the result for the compound in the unspiked sample should be approximated In general the results of the entire fraction for the unspiked sample may be approximated (Td) when fifty percent of the RPDs are greater than the established Quality Control limits
LaboratonyDuplicate-Actions shouidbe_appiied-to-duplicate samples only
Duplicate Sample Sample
RPDFraction Compound
oft UZshy
it4pound- J+J~ ftftftL
a oft amp$- ft
b 6P 2 lt- L -a0 33 8ft ft(gt
7 3 jftL M)J ^ JdL ft C
(P383 lt7
J3mdash PU-J l JpoundL 7 7 JLZ p- c (sl 7 7 J3Xshypound_
Remarks V7A -7 a
SIN jm A^ ftgt JA
h mdash - bull ^
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation _ Data Review Worksheets
VI FIELD PRECISION RESULTS
Soil Aqueous ___
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter was evaluated The duplicate analysis RPD advisory acceptance criteria should be
Fraction Aqueous Soil
VOA 3gt 15 25 BaseNeutral 25 32
Acid Jgt 45 Jgt 43 Pesticide 3gt 25 3gt 45
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix
Field prevd^on adyisory acceptance_cnteriajwas__generated_by_calculating_the mean RPD for each fraction from the matrix spike duplicate QC limits on Form III
Duplicate Sample7 Sample if
Fraction Compound AF 71 RPD
V0 A
y - js QO f (TO 2
C P 7 3 i
2 3 0 3 amp 3 Q bSt
f3QT nrou-
IsP7 A yQO TH3 23QO Co) CT7gt SC Cxnro
JampU2gt 22LS v o n ICC CO TtiC
5~zrigtUs 3dro
Remarks
-ton s ~P~a sLfX lSL r^r7A rP -3n sJj t l c J mdashr- PL Ls_ ^sCi-JLt-SImdashmdash~ mdash
SPfi il V JLampt fa h^isLPi - (y^ ls) si (SU^JJplmJuss Hy1 P
y ^ L 0 bull Y t o A ( (Trmdash
tst~Kyigt-H A CLSIDK j AI^PA 71A OS0 ibullbull 7 i ^ poundbull( VCP- CPtssY rPmdash 7
Calculation RPD = A - B 100 (A+B)2
Note RPD - Relative percent difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
-pYrio-l-irO C6lfygt survd (j
$ pound Z JlxdL L+sL ^30^ r3f)OCgt0^ _ _-lmdash -h^3^poundLlpoundlI Z [2i pcyS3 Qocou
- [Lmdash J )plusmnsrJ rA j - ppOOOU- 1( ftpT
$4=3 Wo~X _=
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
vn BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed The contamination in the blanks are listed below
A Laboratory Blanks
DATE LAB ID FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
rfrrit zJLSlMlf Mh 3 C
j o Plt x pound 3 pound v fyj k A ^ pound H dTtgt M A mdash
M f i lt L Z k Z e h r M 2 (- 7 1 -Nift-
CJL-shy
B Field Blanks
DATE TR RPT FRACTION COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ppb CRDL
dL Uamph JL~gt
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
VBC BLANK ACTION TABLE
4rtinn leve-is should be based upon the highest concentration of contaminant
concentrationdilution factor
Reject Approximate Accept
Common contaminants lt10 10-20x gt20x Other contaminants lt^x 5-1Ox gt10x
^Com_mpn^ontam]na_nts_=_me^ chlorite acetone toluene an^phthala^es^^
For example if 10 DDb of methylene chloride was the highest concentration detected in one of the laboratory blanks the action levels for a field sample with a one to teruddutiorvshywould be calculated to be
mdash(concrx dilution factor x action level factor)
a) 10 ppb x (101) x 10 = 1000 ppbb) 10 ppb x (101) x 20 = 2000 ppb
Reject all concentrations less than 1000 ppbApproximate results in samples between 1000-2000 ppbAccept all results with concentrations greater than 2000 ppb
Detection limits need not be adjusted for blank contamination in a Level I data validation
MAX CONC PbdquobdquorcAtctrrrnCOMPOUND DETECTED ppb R up to 0 between SAMPLES AFFECTED
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
VHI Detection Limit Results
[ Detection limit results were present and found to be less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL)
Detection limit results were not included in the data package
Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following compounds
fraction compound CRDL IDL
Remarks j (1
Y) mdash
Detection limits for soils are based on the aqueous CRDL and the use of 5 ml of
sample extract
aq CRDL ng 5 ml extract = sample DL (dry weight) ml g (dry weight)
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert results reported in wet weight to a dry weight basis
wet weight x solids = dry weight 100
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Volatile Calibration VerificationA nholr t Date of Initial Calibration
IWfL J irHUrofi^j gtl^llaquoy Za3laquoWDate of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Samples affected and ActionDate Instrument RF RSD D (Results)
^ n +|ryvJL--ft b^ shy
ir SLx^ ft t i Jr N b t r bull r ^ ^
Vh o VgtvlaquoA iJL^raquo ^^rV + NbgtYFFPFF cy -t- irf ^ Kyy Nb
^ wraquo-v w -TWmdash 1 yp-- shyFYl Uc V22-euro amp Vr -gt - bullbull rrM^^
rrrnt ~i3 bgt2
itnvt a Action ltLgt~4-mdash iraquo3~cLMLJ -iL n-o- A o- bullraquo bull Approximate(+)
Accept Approximate ( + ) ^ and Reject (ND)Calibration
RF lt030Q (SPCC)Initial RFgt030Q-(SPCC) RSDgt30
RF lt005RF gt005 RSDlt30
RF lt0300 (SPCC)Continuing RFgt030Q (SPCC) D gt25
RF lt005RFgt005 Dlt25
Non-detected results are not evaluated it is beyond the scope ofNOTE 1 work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated Od) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results in the volatile fraction when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed day the calibration was not met
ilojtlti 2
fx 2-ampSft2 ip-gtSgt Y
IV
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONIX
Semi-Volatile Calibration VerificationB PZltFAltshyDate of Initial Calibration
Date of Continuing Calibration
PC Criteria OUT Compounds Date Instrument RF RSD D (Results) Samples affected and Action
bull
gt S-JT- A lt1 ri X Dih f It-- X-h ICC - shy
Action Approximate^)1Approximate ( +) and Reject (ND)
Calibration Accept
Initial RFgt005 RSD gt30 RF lt005 RSD lt30
Continuing RFgt005 Dlt25
D gt25 RF lt005
- Non-detected results are not evaluated because it is beyond theNOTE 1 scope of work for a Level I data validation (DV) However detection limits should be approximated (Jd) when evaluating data based on a Level II data validation
2 - All other HSL compounds (+) - Positive results (ND) - Non-detected compoundsSPCC - System Performance Calibration Compound RF - Response factor RSD - Relative standard deviation D - Percent difference
Actions should be applied to all results when contractual and established advisory criteria are not met for the initial calibration When continuing calibration requirements are not met actions apply only to samples analyzed on the day the calibration was not met
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C Pesticide Calibration Verification
y mdash
The retention time (RT) for DDT was reviewed and found to be greater than or equal to twelve minutes
UDon review of DDTs retention time it was noted that the RT was less than i minutes Action Reject pesticide results due to poor resolution
Retention time (RT) windows were reported on Form IX and standardsample results were found to be within the established RT windows
R e t e n t i o n time^windows were Sported on Form IX The following compounds had RTs which wer^within the established window
RT ActionDate mdashCompound RT Window
Z7l 7)
Action Positive sample results should be considered tentativelyidentified due to the RT not meeting the established window
The total percent breakdown for DDT was less thanl The total percent breakdown for endrin did not exceed 20 DDTs percent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (J) a nuantitative results for DDT Qualitative and quantitative results for DDD and DDE should be considered estimated (Jd) and tentative y
DidAn^pe^rcent breakdown exceeded 20 Action Approximate (3) all quantitative results for endrin Qualitative and quantitative results for endrin ketone should be considered tentative (NO)
A review of D in RT for dibutyl chlorendate (DBC) indicated all standards and samples had a RT less than 2 for packed column analysis (less than
TheRT sfuft of^CwMTeviewed and found to be greater than the specified criteria The analysis should be considered unusable (R) for samples Qf7 Jc7 amp
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IX INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION
C pesticide Calibration Verification
In evaluating linearity it was noted that the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10 for the column used
for quantitative determinations The criteria for linearity was not met Action All associated quantitative results should be considered approximate (J)
iW-SL I-5- I 1|-Lru -1shy
1-(-V Ci fty o t i i (gt1 3 i qc i -aoov-i
The percent difference (D) between calibration factors during the twelve hourperiodwas evaluated and found to be less than 15 for quantitation columns and 20 for confirmation columns The D was greater than specified criteria for the following compounds
Coiumn ActionDate Com D
f 0mshyyjft-pU ~5TQ~ IT a i
oiOjAaJLLL~p0kshyaaA x QtO
Cyy^Ld LL- 0
bbr JLL
iFjJULr-i i
m7 fa S finamph dJ2ZA -0VCshybullA
-itr)- nm -gto
l HPCsK-dls^-^shy
7fJgt A$L- ^H 1fsxJlh+s- kxA 2_
J0M
Action (jfVH positive results for samples with a D greater than
the specified criteria Detection limits should be approximated (UJ)
under a Level II data validation for D not meeting contractual
requirements
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Attachment No 5
ALLIANCE Technologies Corporation
MEMO TO Ben Rice February 19 1987
FROM Joan Schlosstein
SUBJECT SILRESIM DATA VALIDATION CASE 6572
Case 6572 from Nanco Labs is comprised of nine medium level soils for inorganic analysis The samples were collected on Nov 12~13 1986 byAlliance Technologies Corporation and identified by Traffic Report Numbers MAD 766 MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 769 MAD 770 MAD 771 MAD 772 MAD 773 and MAD 774 A validation of this data was conducted by Alliance evaluating the following parameters
o Data Completeness o Holding Times o Calibration Verification o Laboratory Blank Results o Interference QC Results o Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results o Laboratory Precision Evaluation o Field Precision Evaluation o Laboratory Control Sample Results o Detection Limit Results o Standard Addition Results o Serial Dilution Results
Not all information necessary to conduct this review was present One page of calibration data was missing however Ms Joan Connolly of Nanco Labs has corrected that omission Calibrations interference checks and laboratorycontrol sample results were reviewed and found acceptable No contamination was detected in the preparation blank Field blanks were not collected
Matrix spike recoveries of Antimony Arsenic Barium Lead ManganeseSelenium and Silver were outside of acceptable limits Actions taken on the sample results are summarized below
Spike SampleElement Recovery Results Action Taken
Antimony 456 ND UJ detection limit may be biased low
Arsenic -57 -fvalue J possibility of a false negative exists
Barium 129 +value J possibility of a false negative exists
Lead 682 +value J sample results may be biased low
213 Burlington Road Bedford Massachusetts 01730 617-275-9000 A TIC Company
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Manganese -2827= +value J sample results may be biased very low
Selenium 07 ND UR possibility of false negative exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Silver 28 ND UR possibility of false negatives exists detection limits are elevated over what is reported or severe analytical deficiencies exist
Laboratory duplicate analysis conducted on Sample MAD 767 was acceptableSamples MAD 769 and MAD 771 were field generated duplicates Sample results are compared in the data worksheets enclosed Acceptance limits of 35 percentrelative difference were exceeded for Arsenic Beryllium Magnesium ChromiumCopper Iron Lead and Manganese After conversations with the field investigator and the EPA Project Officer it was determined that no action should be taken based on these results due to the inconsistencies in the sample matrix
Instrument detection limits were present and found to be less than or equal to the Contract Required Detection Limits
Duplicate injections and analytical spikes were performed for all samplesanalyzed by Furnace AA Based on the recoveries of these spikes it was determined that the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) should be performed as follows
Element Samples Requiring MSA Quantitation
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 774
Selenium MAD 767mspk
The correlation coefficients of MSA results were less than 0995 for the following
Element Samples Affected Action Taken
Arsenic MAD 767dup MAD 767mspk J Arsenic results for MAD 767 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773 MAD 768 MAD 771 MAD 773
Selenium MAD 767mspk no action taken
A 14 serial dilution was performed on Sample MAD 766 All sample results greater than ten times the instrument detection limit agreed within ten percent of their undiluted values
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Results of the data validation are presented in the Data Review Worksheets enclosed More than ten percent of the data was checked for transcriptionquantitation errors Two transcription errors were noted Matrix spike recoveries of Arsenic and Manganese were calculated usingincorrect values for the spiked sample results Ms Connolly confirmed these as transcription errors and has re-submitted From V of the data package
I hereby acknowledge receipt and review of the validation of case 6572 from Nanco Labs
Deputy Project Officer Regional Sample Control Center
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Project Name ~ S i l TDD No bullData Review Worksheets Reference No
REGIONAL REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TheThe hardcopiedhardcopiec (laboratory(laooratory namename ^CPWyut bull LamplgSuuizi ^nrmhnrp data ---^H^^tr^Lc^datr nnri rhp rruaiitv aataRecion I has been reviewed and the quality assuranceassurance andand performanceperformance data summar ized The da ta reviewec inclucec
mdashi~rmmdashro7rr~niq requiresthat specific analytical work bejione and that EMHLdVonaan
SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on examination of
Field Precision Evaluation m Holding times Lab Control Sample Results laquo Calibration Verification Detection Limit Results laquo Field and Lab Blank Analysis Standard Addition Resultsbull Interference QC Results bdquo SerialDilution Results laquo Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results m Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Definition of Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data 3B - Approximate data due to blank contamination _
Approximate data due to other quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control review ND - Non-detected element + - Positive element identification
Date MReviewer
3
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Values reported in PPB unless otherwise stated for aqueous samplesHSL Inorganic Results Values reported in PPM uless otherwise stated lor soil samples
Instrument JDetectionNUS-S i-amdash Sample Number Limits
bullbullna Js1 bullgt nnOy 71 r ltbull gt bull ^ 3 vgtTraffic Report Number Qtfil-1- bull mfiOr- i
civWrVU cJ L J H 1 3 t-7P i 4 bulllt - SP -o J 1 c i3 f t - - - gtAluminum
lt J c-~ L AAntimony ( (A gtgt mdash lt rr a gt plusmn-plusmnArsenic -LLd- 3
Barium G 33Y JH3pound A X2 C-o 7 V gt Beryllii gtbull - LA O lYia 1 Q -bulllt 3 bullgt JL- 0- lt CA
A-iCadmium iA Y f n 3XL r-1 -bullgtraquo pound TkLXl ZJSiZZ Pi u 7 H tLU- PL f Y 7379 YiCalcium CxYr l 0 Ys -gt gt laquo 3 V--gtChromium ^UL b Af7shy
CHIP 6 1gt rJ YiCobalt a bull iX I l l A3JAL bullP jj- -71 7 pound aCopper 3JL- r iM shy
Iron 4^1 bull r 73 P W7 7 313$b -7 YtboS VSY) 3 - bull z WA Lead As A o 5 j Vf Q YY guy bullV Av Pgt to Magnesium ooo VY i j Y f tfei r JAIXLYL ~LP11 3YS^ Yi -Tk pound Manganese pound 3 7 1 5 pound gt f 37 $lb yv
Mercury CV 41 pound O-1 gt-ltbull O LA Q h pound gt (bull h O- 7 0 n - l a Sgt Nickel J3l bullV pound pound L-ri gt Y 3 -) r i 3 b A Ygt Potassium jri n p 13L2X1- poundLplusmnplusmn 3Lgt ~3 la fbull1t 1Y) Y~S7 bull- yL Lbull_ 7i^ i
Selenium if LA YZ bull S laquox- YL- Ca m J gtSilver Yc 3ca f gt A Xishy
i -cSodi rpound bull -Q P a-a1A Y 3391 1~gtH LA LaThallium (A- CA lA- fampA- J3- bull-L PL LA
Vanadium 3c Y(f J bull A Yi b 7 A 3 y
ZC Y O YYY JJSL Yf i -V W amp 33gt 3c h 3J3 C i f l A X I pound bull Other YL A At J 0 f ( A poundgtbull pound O LUshy CY A 6- - U U 0- u JY
i solids diL JJ-L mdashImdash X JLXL Matrix (s-soil a-aqueous)
Calculating Sample Detection Analytical Method Limits for Soil Samples (mgkg)Lab Quality Control Qualifiers
() If the result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument F - Furnace IDL(ugL) V(ml) x IL IOOOgm x Imy detection limit but less than the contract required detection P - ICPFlame AA solids W(gms) 1000ml lkg IOOOug
limit report the value in brackets (ie (10)) CV - Cold Vapor Indicates the sample was analyzed but not detected V Volume in milliliters which sample is diluted up to
Samples were diluted tQLi- milliliters after digestion W Wet weight in grams of sample digested grams of
Report with the detection limit value (eg 10U)
NUS Quality Control Qualifiers each sample was digested 3 poundt~-ltrK2 r A Acceptable data IDL Instrument detection limit 3B Approximate data due to blank contamination R Reject data due to quality control review ND Not Detected NA Not Analyzed
Case No L 7 Laboratory Yy ygt r c ltr Id Site 5 gt Jgt 7 n
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
I Holding Times
Date samples received ^ ) (( Date analyzed (Hggt IVv mdashfr-rcgtLDate analyzed (ail others) by kU I ft ouui Nov lYi lioQ
Action
If samDies are analyzed for mercury (2S days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time reject results
Remarks L h r f h r i f t f M X l l h f u A Micflvfii-fv fP p0^ Chorampri TC n luSS Kirfci T C P lt gt v J p ( f x - - 0 ^ _ ( u n r h A - H i bull qmdashAc +ltbull cm -Var-v - ^_ V -mdash
II Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriiication
Calibrations were performed every ten samples and met contractual criteria
Calibrations were not performed every ten samples andor did not meet contract-specified windows (specify) ___ mdash
Action Windows
Accept Approximate Reject
80-120 for +ND 50-79 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +NDmercury gt121 for ND 121-150 for +
all others 90-110 for +ND 50-89 for +ND lt50 or gt150 for +ND gt111 for ND 111-150 for +
NOTE
+ - positive values ND - non-detected elements
Q)KS)
Remarks lt-lnd-~ClirKd ^M-rrrTwmi- m ^ gt niu m dp 3 J)lpMnfs ppi Catlt lt^pr 4cY^-rrnn^crffr)h errors prfpt i -Pr t fh fa t f gtbullgt ra ro Irrf T
tC-eScJTs pcLv-fl ofc- 1 all tgtltgt mtu-k ri^tr fc fifj gti rtkshyr e p ^ v i lt - laquo bull P L t r k i J gt l bdquo A i i P ( f w r i t e mdash
Ahssryf P1L or ^ bullmdash o^yiOSC 0 lt~
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
- f i a U W a n l s ^ V gt t c c c
NUS Corporation vV Data Review Worksheets
III Blank Anaiysis Results
Cont Calib Blank Preparation Blank Field Blank
Inititai Calibration 2 12 ActionBlank ValueContaminants
Iron lTz7( 77r 1
Lead SO o^ i lt) j 7
Magnesium )gt) (M hOdoU xvpoundP 7jxo am
Manganese JO ix 7 J j -
Mercury nJ7 la n znnr i tM o) j j
Nickel SO iM SOiAV)XX 6 A Potassium L~V)h m)btA Man ~7OQJLA-
Selenium S-LL 5fJ Sj1 _Lm_ Silver JO U 1 JO JUL ) ) Zltltltshy
Sodium inoou H(h)iX foDdti I 000AJ
Thallium Sju ipoundL Mm ) JA-
Vanadium LQ 11 mi A Zinc JO ss JlUL )0M bullzua
Other (37 JO M MILL JOjL
Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluated and qualified
Action levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contamination determined in any field or laboratory blank by five The action ^evreg for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor
All results lessthan 5x action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as 3B No action should be taken on the blank value itself
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
IV ICP Interference Check Sample Analysis
The IC interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correcnon factors
Interference QC samples were run before and after every 10 samples and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW
Interference QC samples were run but did not meetthe control limits
-Icujornn-tmdash-he samrni^-data-Gan^e-aGGepted-wit-hout-^ali-ficaticn-if-tne mdash iconcentlatlonsuoSu Cat-Ee nd-M-g-ara-less_rhan_50SS-of_Ihe_lCb-ConcentEations
Further evaluation of data not meeting the interference check sample control limits is beyond the scope of work for a level I data validateJleterto__
-Inorganics D-LSOW -for ieveUI DV-guidelinesshy
Mote- The 20 contract limit is based on the true value for EPA standajrds^andorv the mean-value trun-at4eastufi-ve-times)iforzron-ERA-standards
i bull A
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
V Matrix Spike Results Sample ih _Sample th rjimdashTi J
SSR SR R R ActionSSR SR S R ActionCompound
^ 0^ ) SS^O Ap-Aluminum cy bull - iZ(6 c o n I C o o 1 X 5 b ^ Antimony
lti0 I HO lyrtflfCArsenic m 3^ 7 SPO (LIS3 I zcco 1 jlzi I lt1Barium
AO | CO I I ZO IBeryllium f i 1 V 1 ^ 0 1 zb 1Cadmium
czkgt3 iLdQcOl M It-Calcium
Chromium 3o 1 (67 I iZshy b to sooCobalt
llri AS0 1 lOH- ICopper H]b ^iSuu I r o n
7bO i koZtXLead ~8^r CTJCJ KcciX) I y i Magnesium
bullSCO bullZ-7113^ Manganese )ss l I i z lb -uLmdash A-Mercury 7- shy
Nickel bQQ it
Potassium -WpoundshyfmdashSeleniummdash Y-S^shy
371 S(J- lilJiZmdashSilvershyltr Sodium iO H nwLiA i
HI c 50 5551Thallium
Vanadium to 5C
500Zinc i m-t 576 Other (ltV 17-Z iQ- i AO 7A7shy
Calculation = SSR-SR x 100 S
Accept Approximate Reiect
SSR(75-125) SR(+)+ SSRlt30 _ SR(ND)+ SSRlt30
SR(+ND)+ SSR(30-74)
SR(+)+ SSRgt1254
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 of more no action is taken
NOTE
S - amount of spike - mdash bullmdash ~ SSR spiked sample result SR unspiked sample results R percent recovery ND non-detected elements
- + positive results - ~
1 Discuss in review that sample results could be biased significantly low and that the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present
2 Indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negatives detection limits are elevated over what is reported and that severe analytical deficiencies exist
3 Determine percent bias of results and detection limits Report that the detection limit may be biased low4 Determine percent bias of sample results false positive results may potentially exist
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation
Element
Matrix spike Duplicate Actions should be applied to ail other samples of the same m a t r i x t y p e n q 0 a c A r O O W O
Actions For aqueous samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples 3 results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL
- For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NO
Calculation RPD = A - B x 100 (A + B)2
NOTE CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference A - Sample Result B - Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets -
vn Fieid Precision Evaluation
Element CRDL Sample ih Duplicate Sample ih juhzllL
RPD Action
wkMshy
^uJt uW ltshy shy
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
Actions For aqueous samples T results for elements which have an RPD 20lt^ For soU samples T results for elements which have an RPD gt 35 -If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL then action limits are + CRDL For sample results less than the CRDL the RPD is not calculated (NC)
Calculation RPD = A - B (A + B)2
x 100
NOTE
CRDL RPD
--
Contract Required Detection Limit Relative Percent Difference
A B
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review-Worksheets
Yin Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Control analysis was performed and met contractual criteria
Laboratory Control analysis was performed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements
Actions RejectApproximateAccept
_ _ 8 0 - 1 2 0 f o r ND+ -30-79joigtND__^=3L^__ Recovery_ gt120 for +gt120 for ND lt30~~for +
a3 1 A( bull i -fix ri bull
NOTE
mdash+ 2 positive Results ~~ND~-t OPt detected elements
LCS mercuryj^p^s^t-c^ir^f^t^a^atoryNote An aqueo^s LL-o^
I X Detection Limit Results
instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
not included in the data packageDetection limit results were
present but the criteria was not met for theDetection limits were following elements
Action
detection limit should be rejected (R d)
Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detection limit (mgkg) =
1 mg1L x 1000 gmIDL (ue1) x Volume diluted to (ml) 1000 ug1000 ml 1 kgsolids^ wet weight digested vgms)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
x standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis - fi W laquobull c
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for ail samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following bull sampleselements ~
5trade^ recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows ^ | f )regj sbull-gt
O A-Uiuo A- bull - Si-iip Spike Recov Spike Recov- Spike Recov j_____
mdashmdash85-rr5^mdashmdash~ltSorgt n5 lt10^
i
bullAccept use MSA bullReject
Sam pledonc gt50 -~7 ^7 i)uf 6 768lt 7 - -of spike-value mdash^ y ~
If the spike recovery is less than 10 and theTaboratory has not re-analyzed the-sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addit ion (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(J Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NU5 Corporation _ _ Data Review Worksheets - mdash - - ~
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Anaiysis shy
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(J sample results)
mdashSpike recoveries-merthe 85-1i~5recovery criteria Tor all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
Spike Recov Spike Recov Spike Recov - - - - S5_n5 - mdash lt85 or gt115 lt10~
Sampie corcgt50 Accept ^ use MSA Reject -of spike-value- ^5^4 161 filSPK shy
If the spike recovery is less than M and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (J) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample
(J Data)
( MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) ~~ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
Mi) - 74 7 rfcPK (3 Data)
Comments fish) J A1 f Av
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NU5 Corporation Data Review Worksheets
X Standard AdditionsFurnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections were within + 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements mdash
Duplicate injections did not agree within + 20 for samples
(3 sample results)
Spike recoverres-met the 85-ff5-Tecovery criteria for airsampfes
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 recovery criteria Actions should be taken as follows
spike Recov Spike Recov sPike Recov - amp5-rr5~T~mdashmdash lt85 or gtH5 _ lt10
Sample_cbHc-^5d~ Accept-mdash use MSA Reject-shy-of spike-vaiue
If the spike recovery is less than W and the laboratory has not re-analyzed the sample approximate (3) the data for that sample
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sample ih
(3 Data)
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt 0995 (accept results) Correlation coefficients lt0995 for samples numbers
(3 Data)
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
NUS CorporationData Review Worksheets
Serial Dilution ResultsInductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AnalysisXI
Serial
b ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic
Absorption should not be evaluated
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the dilutee sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
j eriarDilutiohswerenot performed~fortheJfotrowing
-Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did -within10 for analyte-concentrations greater than IQxthe
~dilution mdashcere
_Sample
Elemenr -lotshy IDL x 10shybull a
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium
sshy~L
tO )0
ZiJ(lt-bull ~
Sc-shyZ0 Sc
iZOcc HO iodeg V -Lgt lOj-CW
ioi -Z ic 5^
(Jco t o it
37 500 iJ gt
Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
to zo I Q O O ooo
O gt 0
L V
i t~ j i C C-OO il o L
xX -
f C ZZ 57
ZZoo 0- V 50
Zh6
Other
Serial Diiute_d_ --Sample
iC i i Z 5
bSoo bullZo 6 8
q cgt oo
ltT - ~ l foo O - o
z z y
bull
7 Actions 0 0 bull
6bull6
9 ult
Ail data for samples of the same matrix for that element should beActions -approximated (3)-when the serial dilution results - do not meet contractual requirements
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
i lt
NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets
XII Calculations
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ug1) to actual sample concentrations (mg g)
If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters
sample results (mgkg) = wet weight
snn mi IL 1000 em 1 mg laquoueU T7 Tjm 1000 mi X 1kg 1000 ug
In-addition-the results are-converted to-dry weight using the-percenrsolids calculation
= f i n a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d r y w e i g h t
J
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
V O L A T I L E S
M e t h y l e n e C h i o r i d e T r a n s - 1 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
M e t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r j c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
4 5 0 0
3 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 1 8 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 0 0
Attachment No 6
S E M I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T P I T 1
2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e F i u o r a n t h e n e
T E S T P I T 4 N O R T H
1 2 mdash Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e F l u o r e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e F l u o r a n t h e n e P v r e n e B u t y 1 b e n z y 1 p h t h a 1 a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e H e p t a c h l o r 4 4 - B B D
T E S T P I T 4 S O U T H
2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a e n e F l u o r e n e 4 4 - D D T
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 0 0
3 8 0 0 1 8 0 0 0
8 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 0
4 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 5 0 0
B 8 0 2 5 0 0
6 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 4 0 0
6800 9 5 0 2 4 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m I r o n L e a d M a g n e 5 i u m M a n g a n e s e Z i n c
A 1 u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m Chromium C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c I e1 P o t a s s i u m S e l e n i u m V a n a d i u m Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
1211 11
6 3 5 8
4 2 2 3 3
1 3 4 6 3
59 1 2
5 1 6 7 9
60 2 2 7 9
8 1
2 3 7 95 3 5
B 0 1 5 5 8
8 9 2 9 2 1
6 0 5
1 3 3 3 5 0 3
1 4 6 3 4 0
2 5 4 8 1 4
5 9
5 5 4 8 68
9 3 2 86 1 4 1 3
6 B 7
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E S
1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 1 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u d n e E t h v l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 2 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
4 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0
S E H I V O L A T I L E S
T E S T F I T
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e N a p h t h a i e n e 2 - M e t h v l n a p h t h a l e n e D i e t h y l p h t h a l a t e H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e F h e n a n t h r e n e D i - n - B u t v l p h t h a l a t e b i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 h e s y 1 ) p h t h a l a t e B i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e A 1 d r i n E n d o s u l T a n S u l f a t e
T E S T P I T 6
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e
T E S T P I T 8
b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) F h t h a1 a t e
3 9 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
2 8 0 0 4 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 4 0 0 7 5 0 0
1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
6 4 0 1 0
2 6 0 0
1 6 0 0
I N O R G A N I C S
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i u m C - h r o m i u r n C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a n g a n e s e M e r c u r y N i c k e l Z i n c C y a n i d e
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t Copper I r o n L e a d M a p n e s i u r n M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l P o t a s s i u m V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
A l u m i n u m A r s e n i c B a r i u r n C a d m i u r n C a l c i u m C h r o m i u m C o b a l t C o p p e r I r o n L e a d M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l V a n a d i u m Z i n c
2 2 1 9 1 2 60
2 6
1 6 5 7 9 4 1
4 2 2 7
0 7 1 4
1 3 3 1 3
7 9 3 3 9
3 4 9 8 9
9 8
5 4 2 4 4 7 2
1 0 5 1 1 6 9
3 2 2 2 4
4 7 2 1 6
1 6 8
3 5 9 6 shy
28 4
2 6 4 1 2 1 1
3 660
4 2 2 8 6 1 4 9 5 9 3 2 9 8
1 0 1 6
1 4 8
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184
Attachment No 6 (cont)
V O L A T I L E 5 S E M I V O L A T I L ES I N O R G A N I C S
T E S T P I T 9 ( s h a l l o w
C h i o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e B e n z e n e -T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r D b e n z e n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
5 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 B 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0
3 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0
1 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e I s o p h o r o n e 1 2 4 - T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e N a p h t h a l e n e 2 - M e t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e A c e n a p h t h y l e n e A c e n a p h t h e n e F l u o r e n e H e x a c h 1 o r o b e n z e n e P h e n a n t h r e n e A n t h r a c e n e B i - n - B u t y 1 p h t h a l a t e F y r e n e B u t y l b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( a ) A n t h r a n c e c b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x y l p h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e B e n z o ( a ) P y r e n e
- 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 8 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0
4 5 U 0 5 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
6 2 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0
A 1 u m i n i m A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a d m i r i bull SiC a l c i Chromi C o b a l t y C o p p e r I r o n r j)Lead M a g n e s i u r n c M a n g a n e s e lt M e r c u r y N i c k e l P o t a s s i u r n V a n a d i u r n Z i n c
c-2shy
ltrgt
amp
J
lt52896CO 11 J
T449 e r j 2
lj5 0 i V73iTh 1 3957bull
6B2 $S 652
63 0 8
1 2 262
15 1231
y
T E S T F I T 9 ( d e e p )
M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e 6 5 0 0 I s o p h o r o n e 1 1 0 0 A 1 u m i n i m 4B56
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r 1 c h 1 o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 4 0 0
D i - n - O c t y l P h t h a l a t e 1 9 0 0 A r s e n i c B a r i u m C a l c i u m
42 541
B e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e
6 3 0 9 5 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
C h r o m i u m C o p p e r I r o n L e a d
1 1 7
5074 34
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e T o t a l X y l e n e s
8 8 0 0 B 1 0 0
1 9 0 0 0
M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s e N i c k e l P o t a s s i u m
1459 61shy
9 471
Z i n c 130
T E S T F l T 9 ( d e e p - d u p l i c a t e )
C h l o r o f o r m 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e
7 3 0 2 4 0 0 3 8 0 0
1 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e b i s ( 2 - E t h v l h e x v l ) P h t h a l a t e
8 3 0 1 2 0 0
A l u m i n i u m A r s e n i c B a r i u m
3765 7
35
T e t r a c h 1 o r o e t h e n e 1 4 0 0 C a d m i u m 4
T o l u e n e 2 3 0 0 C a l c i u m 329
E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e T o t a l X v l e n e s
2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0
C h r o m i u n C o b a l t C o p p e r
1479 3
877 1 r o n 48608 L e a d 144 M a g n e s i u m M a n g a n e s eN i c k e l
5B2 367
9 V a n a d i u m 1 8 Z i n c 184