Scrum Framework

43
The SCRUM Framework

Transcript of Scrum Framework

Page 1: Scrum Framework

The SCRUM Framework

Page 2: Scrum Framework
Page 3: Scrum Framework
Page 4: Scrum Framework
Page 5: Scrum Framework
Page 6: Scrum Framework
Page 7: Scrum Framework
Page 8: Scrum Framework
Page 9: Scrum Framework
Page 10: Scrum Framework
Page 11: Scrum Framework
Page 12: Scrum Framework
Page 13: Scrum Framework
Page 14: Scrum Framework
Page 15: Scrum Framework
Page 16: Scrum Framework
Page 17: Scrum Framework

TEAM Self-Assesment

Area / Question Score CommentsProduct Ownership Health

Product Owner facilitates user story development, prioritization and negotiation 3.0

Product Owner collaborates proactively with Product Management and other stakeholders 3.0

User Stories are small, estimated, functional and vertical 3.0

Product owner facilitates development of acceptance criteria which are used in planning, review and story acceptance 3.0

Teams refine the backlog every sprint 3.0

Total Product Health Score 15.0 60%PSI/Release Health

Team participates fully in Release Planning and Inspect and Adapt 3.0

Product backlog for the PSI is itemized and prioritized 3.0

Teams proactively interact with other teams on the train as necessary to resolve impediments 3.0

Team participates in System Demo every two weeks, illustrating real progress towards objectives 3.0

Team reliably meet 80-100% of non-stretch PSI Objecives 3.0

Total PSI/Release Health Score 15.0 60%Sprint Health

Team plans the sprint collaboratively, effectively and efficiently 3.0

Team always has clear sprint goals, in support of PSI objectives, and commits to meeting them 3.0

Teams apply acceptance criteria and Definition of Done to story acceptance 3.0

Team has a predictable, normalized velocity which is used for estimating and planning 3.0

Team regularly delivers on their sprint goals 3.0

Total Sprint Health Score 15.0 60%Team Health

Team members are self-organized, respect each other, help each other complete sprint goals, manage interdependencies and stay in-sync with each other 3.0

Scrum Master attends Scrum of Scrums and interacts with RTE as appropriate 3.0Stories are iterated through the sprint with multiple define-build-test cycles (e.g. the sprint is not a waterfalled) 3.0

Team holds collaborative, effective and efficient planning and daily meetings where all members participate, status is given clearly, issues are raised, obstacles are removed and information exchanged 3.0

Team holds a retrospective after each sprint and makes incremental changes to continually improve its performance 3.0

Total Team Health Score 15.0 60%Technical Health

Teams actively reduce technical debt in each sprint 3.0

Team has clear guidance and understanding of intentional architecture guidance, but is free and flexible enough to allow emergent design to support optimal implementation 3.0

Automated acceptance tests and unit tests are part of story DoD 3.0

Refactoring is always underway 3.0

CI, build and test automation infrastructure is improving 3.0

Total Technical Health Score 15.0 60%

Total Team Score 75.0 60%

Radar Chart DataProduct Ownership Health 60%PSI/Release Health 60%Sprint Health 60%Team Health 60%Technical Health 60%

Page 18: Scrum Framework
Page 19: Scrum Framework
Page 20: Scrum Framework
Page 21: Scrum Framework
Page 22: Scrum Framework
Page 23: Scrum Framework
Page 24: Scrum Framework
Page 25: Scrum Framework
Page 26: Scrum Framework
Page 27: Scrum Framework
Page 28: Scrum Framework
Page 29: Scrum Framework
Page 30: Scrum Framework
Page 31: Scrum Framework
Page 32: Scrum Framework
Page 33: Scrum Framework
Page 34: Scrum Framework
Page 35: Scrum Framework
Page 36: Scrum Framework
Page 37: Scrum Framework
Page 38: Scrum Framework
Page 39: Scrum Framework
Page 40: Scrum Framework
Page 41: Scrum Framework
Page 42: Scrum Framework
Page 43: Scrum Framework