Screening for Portal Hypertension in Cirrhosis · disease (CLD) at risk of developing clinically...
Transcript of Screening for Portal Hypertension in Cirrhosis · disease (CLD) at risk of developing clinically...
MASSIMO PINZANI, MD, PhD, FRCPSheila Sherlock Chair of HepatologyUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK
Screening for Portal Hypertensionin Cirrhosis
www.ucl.ac.uk/medicine/liver-and-digestive-health
Best of EASL is a program supported by an unrestrictedmedical education grant by Merck Sharp & Dohme,
Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Best of EASL is a program supported by an unrestrictedmedical education grant by Merck Sharp & Dohme,
Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Is Surveillance Needed?
Abougergi MS, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. Thein-hospital mortality rate for upper GIhemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades inthe United States: a nationwide analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(4):882-8 e1.doi: 10.1016 /j.gie.2014.09.027.
WHEN?
?
“DecompensatingEvent”
Stage 3
Bleeding
Stage 4First nonbleeding
decompensation
Stage 5
Seconddecompensation
Death orOLT
SEPSISRenalFailure
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
CompensatedCirrhosis
DecompensatedCirrhosis
Stage 1
Stage 2
No VaricesNo Ascites
VaricesNo Ascites
HVPG: 5-12 mm Hg
HVPG > 12 mm Hg
Modified from Arvaniti V. et al., Gastroenterology 2010; 139:1246-1256
Natural History of Cirrhosis: Mostly “Observational” !
?
“DecompensatingEvent”
Stage 3
Bleeding
Stage 4First nonbleeding
decompensation
Stage 5
Seconddecompensation
Death orOLT
SEPSISRenalFailure
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
CompensatedCirrhosis
DecompensatedCirrhosis
? ? ?
Stage 1
Stage 2
No VaricesNo Ascites
VaricesNo Ascites
Modified from Arvaniti V. et al., Gastroenterology 2010; 139:1246-1256
YearsMonths
Compensated Cirrhosis: A Stage with LimitedDiagnostic Resources
Alcohol
HCV
Autoimmunedisorders
Others
Cholestasis
One or many??
NASH
Drugs
HBV
CIRRHOSIS
Etiology-driven Cirrhosis
Same Surveillance for DifferentCirrhoses?
HOW?
Early to Advanced Liver FibrosisCirrhosis without Clinical
ManifestationsCirrhosis with Clinical
ManifestationsLiver Failure
HVPG 5-10 mm HgHVPG 5-10 mm HgHVPG < 5 mm Hg HVPG > 10-12 mm Hg
Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
Liver Biopsy (PC or TJ) : Quantitative staging with CPA
Liver Stiffness Measurement
Serum Markers: Direct/Indirect Serum Markers: predictors of liver related outcomes
Spleen Stiffness Measurement
Spleen-related Noninvasive Indexes & Algorhythms
Search for early predictor of decompensation and ACLF
Search for predictors ofprogression rate to cirrhosis
Search for early predictor of HCC
Institute for Liver and Digestive Health
Invasive and Non-invasive Evaluation ofDisease Progression in Chronic Viral Hepatitis
Liver Biopsy with CPA
Calvaruso V, Burroughs AK et al., Hepatology 2009; 49: 1236
Liver Stiffness
y = 1.5952 + 2,037r2 = 0,61p < 0,0001
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
HVPG (mmHg)
Stif
fne
ss(k
Pa)
Vizzutti F et al., Hepatology 2007; 45:1290-1297
PH relatedto Fibrosis
PH scarcely related to Fibrosis:CIRRHOSIS BECOMES A SYSTEMICDISEASE
Diagnostic performance of transient elastography for the detection of clinicallysignificant portal hypertension (HVPG 10 mm Hg)
Authors
Carrion et al. (35)
Vizzutti et al. (36)
Sanchez-Condé et al. (39)
Lemoine et al. (38)
Bureau et al. (37)
AUC
0.92
0.990.92
0.800.80
0.76
0.94
0.94
Se(%)
90
9794
9383
63
90
90
Sp(%)
81
9281
5067
70
88
93
Etiologies
HCV-LT
HCV
HIV-HCV
HCV
Alcohol
CLD
* Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) ≥6 mm Hg; ** severe portal hypertension HVPG ≥12 mm Hg
Patients(n)
124
61
38
44
48
150
+LR
4.7
13.74.9
3.52.5
2.1
7.5
12.8
-LR
0.12
0.020.08
0.620.49
0.53
0.13
0.10
AUC: area under ROC curve; Se sensitivity; Sp specificity; +LR positive likelihood ratio; -LR negative likelihood ratio;HCV chronic hepatitis C; HCV-LT Liver transplant for hepatitis C; CLD chronic liver diseases;
Study design
Prospectivemonocentric
Prospectivemonocentric
Prospectivemonocentric
Retrospectivemonocentric
Prospectivemonocentric
Cut-offsHVPG 10 mm Hg
(kPa)
8.7*
13.617.6**
14.023.0**
20.5
34.9
21.0
Prevalence ofCinically SignificantPortal hypertension
21%
77%
74%
77%
83%
51%
PPV(%)
81
9786
8479
88
97
93
NPV(%)
90
9291
7171
35
64
91
Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J, J Hepatology 2012
Screening and surveillance: Invasive and non-invasivemethods (changed from Baveno III-V)
BAVENO VI (2015)
The introduction of transient elastography (TE) in clinical practicehas allowed the early identification of patients with chronic liverdisease (CLD) at risk of developing clinically significant portalhypertension (CSPH) (1b;A).
For these patients, the alternative term “compensated advancedchronic liver disease (cACLD)” has been proposed to better reflectthat the spectrum of severe fibrosis and cirrhosis is a continuumin asymptomatic patients, and that distinguishing between thetwo is often not possible on clinical grounds (5;D).
BAVENO VI (2015)
Criteria to suspect cACLD (new)
•Liver stiffness by TE is sufficient to suspect cACLD in asymptomaticsubjects with known causes of CLD (1b;A).
•TE often has false positive results; hence two measurements ondifferent days are recommended in fasting conditions (5;D).
•TE values <10 kPa in the absence of other known clinical signs ruleout cACLD; values between 10 and 15 kPa are suggestive of cACLDbut need further test for confirmation; values >15 kPa are highlysuggestive of cACLD (1b;A).
Screening and surveillance: Invasive and non-invasivemethods (changed from Baveno III-V)
BAVENO VI (2015)
Criteria to confirm cACLD (new)•Invasive methods are employed in referral centres in a stepwiseapproach when the diagnosis is in doubt or as confirmatory tests
•Methods and findings that confirm the diagnosis of cACLD are:-Liver biopsy showing severe fibrosis or established cirrhosis(1a;A).-Collagen proportionate area (CPA) measurement on histologyprovides quantitative data on the amount of fibrosis and holdsprognostic value (2b;B) and its assessment is recommended (5;D).-Upper GI endoscopy showing gastroesophageal varices (1b;A).-Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement; values>5 mmHg indicate sinusoidal portal hypertension (1b;A).
Screening and surveillance: Invasive and non-invasivemethods (changed from Baveno III-V)
BAVENO VI (2015)
Diagnosis of CSPH in patients with Viral cACLD (new)
• Liver stiffness by TE ( 20–25 kPa; at least two measurements on different days infasting condition; caution should be paid to flares of ALT; refer to EASL guidelines forcorrect interpretation criteria), alone or combined to platelets and spleen size.•The diagnostic value of TE for CSPH in other aetiologies remains to be ascertained(5;D).•Imaging showing collateral circulation is sufficient to rule-in CSPH in patients withcACLD of all aetiologies (2b;B).
Identification of patients with cACLD who can safely avoidscreening endoscopy (new)Patients with a liver stiffness <20 kPa and with a platelet count >150,000 have a very lowrisk of having varices requiring treatment, and can avoid screening endoscopy (1b;A).
Screening and surveillance: Invasive and non-invasivemethods (changed from Baveno III-V)
Congestion
Hypertrophy andHyperplasia
Fibrosis
INCREASE INSPLEEN
STIFFNESS ??
The Spleen in the Assessment of AdvancedChronic Liver Disease
Measurement of Spleen Stiffness by Fibroscan
2. - Splenic parenchymal thickness > 4 cm (by US)
1. – Sufficient intercostal space width
3. – Success rate > 60% and IQR < 30% of median value
4. – Intra-observer reproducibility 96%, inter-observerreproducibility 94%
5. – Probe upper limit 75 kPa
Spleen Stiffness
P = 0.0000R2 = 0,78
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Spleen Stiffness (kPa)H
VP
G(m
mH
g)
P = 0.0000R² = 0,70
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Liver Stiffness (kPa)
HV
PG
(mm
Hg)
“Compensated”Cirrhosis
Esophageal Varices: NO
Esophageal Varices: YES
Colecchia A. et al., Gastroenterology 2012 ; 143(3):646-54
EV: NO EV: YES EV: NO EV: YES
Liver and Spleen Stiffness for the Predictionof the Presence of Esophageal Varices
Colecchia A. et al., Gastroenterology 2012 ; 143(3):646-54
Non Invasive Measures Including Spleen ParametersP
INZA
NIM
-2
01
3
Non Invasive Measures Including Spleen Parameters
Fuchs BC et al. J Hepatol 2013
DEC-MRI withEP-3533 contrast
Courtesy of Dr. AnnalisaBerzigotti, Hospital ClinicBarcelona
Molecular Imaging of Collagen
Increasing tissue hypoxiaand endothelial dysfunction
Neoangiogenesis and microthrombosis
Activation of the stem cell compartment
Ductular reaction and “reactive”cholangiocytes
Unbalanced vasoconstrictors and scarcontraction
Hepatocyte necrosis/apoptosis,inflammatoryinfiltration
All potential targets for bio-imaging and functional imaging
Measuring Collagen: What are we missing?
BR55: A lipopeptide-based VEGFR2-targeted US contrast agent for
molecular imaging of angiogenesisPochon et al. Invest Radiol 2010Willmann et al Radiology 2008
Binding is amplified by ARFFrinking et al. Ultras Med Biol 2012
+ +
To Be ExploitedElastin, Collagen cross-linking: IRREVERSIBILITYImmunophenotype, macrophage markers: REVERSIBILITY
Get notified atwww.ilc-congress.eu/get-notified-ilc-2016-barcelona-spain
Liver disease in resource-limited settingsEASL Monothematic ConferenceBUCHAREST, ROMANIAMAY 29-30
Liver cirrhosis and complicationsClinical School of Hepatology Course 24MOSCOW, RUSSIAJUNE 5-6
Autoimmune hepatitisEASL Monothematic ConferenceLONDON, UNITED KINGDOMSEPTEMBER 3-5
Management of critically ill cirrhotic patientsEASL Clinical School of Hepatology Course 25BARCELONA, SPAINOCTOBER 22-23
EASL MasterclassMILAN, ITALYDECEMBER 3-5
EVENTS 2015
www.easl.eu/events
Addressing end-stage liver disease-A multi-faceted challengeEASL Special ConferenceGLASGOW, UNITED KINGDOMSEPTEMBER 25-27
Just some of the manyEASL Membership benefits
Discover what else is on offer atwww.easl.eu/membership
Exchange and network with colleagues fromaround the world!
Visit www.easl.eu/community or go to the EASL Booth tofind out how!