SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE...
Transcript of SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE...
ITP506/2018
1
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING
THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
Purwiyatno Hariyadiphariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Kondisi (pemanasan) dan tujuan pasteurisasi dari beberapa produk pangan … (1)
ITP506/2018
2
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Kondisi (pemanasan) dan tujuan pasteurisasi dari beberapa produk pangan … (2)
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Kondisi (pemanasan) pasteurisasi susu & produk-produk susu*).
*) IDFA, Pasteurization: Definition and Methods. ( http://www.idfa.org/files/249_Pasteurization%20Definition%20and%20Methods.pdf)
*) IDFA, Pasteurization: Definition and Methods. ( http://www.idfa.org/files/249_Pasteurization%20Definition%20and%20Methods.pdf)
ITP506/2018
3
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
E
*) IDFA, Pasteurization: Definition and Methods. ( http://www.idfa.org/files/249_Pasteurization%20Definition%20and%20Methods.pdf)
Kondisi (pemanasan) pasteurisasi susu & produk-produk susu*).
Ekivalensi? Nilai Pasteurisasi (Pasterurization value) = Pv
.
10 .
10
T = Suhu produk selama proses pasteurisasiTR = Suhu Acuan PasteurisasiZ = Nilai Z untuk mikroba (pathogen) target
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
4
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
5
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Alternative-Emerging Food Processing Technologies (FDA/IFT 2000)http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm100158.htm
• Microwave and Radio Frequency • Ohmic and Inductive Heating • High Pressure Processing • Pulsed Electric Field • High Voltage Arc Discharge • Pulsed Light • Ultraviolet Light • Ultrasound • X-Rays
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
6
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Questions of Interest
Process Description?
Mechanism of Activation?
Critical Factors and Quantification?
Process deviations?
Organizms of concern?
Indicator organizms ?
Main reseacrh need ?
Generator(Oscilator)
+/-
+/-
FoodMaterial
H H
H H
O
O
-
++++
-“Change of Orientation
Polarization”
++
Ionicdisplacement
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Questions of Interest
Process Description?
Mechanism of Activation?
Critical Factors and Quantification?
Process deviations?
Organizms of concern?
Indicator organizms ?
Main reseacrh need ?
Generator(Oscilator)
+/-
+/-
FoodMaterial
Internal Heating- keyword: Heating
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
7
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Questions of Interest
Process Description?
Mechanism of Activation?
Critical Factors and Quantification?
Process deviations?
Organizms of concern?
Indicator organizms ?
Main reseacrh need ?
Technology
Microwave Ohmic Heating
Well described Well described
Well described Well described
Well describedHard to predict cold zone
Well describedHard to predict cold zone
As in conventional thermal processing
As in conventional thermal processing
As in conventional thermal processing
As in conventional thermal processing
As in conventional thermal processing
As in conventional thermal processing
Prediction of cold zoneand Uniformity of heating
Prediction of cold zone
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Questions of Interest
Process Description?
Mechanism of Activation?
Critical Factors and Quantification?
Process deviations?
Organizms of concern?
Indicator organizms ?
Main reseacrh need ?
Technology of High Hydrostatic Pressure
• High Pressure can kill microorganisms by interrupting with their cellular function without the use of heat that can damage the taste, texture, and nutritional value of the food.
~87000 psi~36000 psi
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
8
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Questions of Interest
Process Description?
Mechanism of Activation?
Critical Factors and Quantification?
Process deviations?
Organizms of concern?
Indicator organizms ?
Main reseacrh need ?
Technology of High Hydrostatic Pressure
Well described
Well described
Well describedProposed Models
Well described
Identified
Suggested
Validation kineticsInfluence of synergistic processing conditions
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
• Incativate food pathogens (salmonella and E.coli0157:H7)
• Preserve the fruit juice's fresh, natural characteristics.
• HHP of 80,000 psi for 30 seconds a 3‐5 log reduction of all of the pathogens of concern in fresh juice
Technology of High Hydrostatic Pressure
Fruit Juice treated by HHP
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
9
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Technology of High Hydrostatic Pressure
• Another example of food safety is the destruction of Vibrio bacteria in raw oysters without destroying the raw feel and taste of the oyster.
• A pressure of 200 to 300 MPa for 5 to 15 minutes at 25C inactivated : ∙ Vibrio parahaemolyticus ATCC 17803, ∙ Vibrio vulnificus ATCC 27562, ∙ Vibrio choleare ATCC 14035, ∙ Vibrio choleare non‐O:1 ATCC 14547, ∙ Vibrio hollisae ATCC 33564∙ Vibrio mimicus ATCC 33653
("D. Berlin, D. Herson, D. Hicks, and D. Hoover; Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 1999“)
Oyster treated by HHP
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Destroys the vibrio in shellfishDetaches the meat from the shell
Equivalence of alternative technologies
Technology of High Hydrostatic Pressure
Oyster treated by HHP
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
10
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Figure. Change in inactivation of Zygosaccharomyces bailii with pressure.
Note that 345 MPa = 50,000 psi. (Enrique Palou, GRA, BSysE Dept., WSU)
Effect of pressure is very similar to the effect of temperature in thermal processes
High hydrostatic pressure
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Thermally-assisted high-pressure lifts quality of shelf-stable foods
Process Variables for Optimum Quality
Tempera-ture
Pressure Products
90°C 700 MPaMain meal entrees, meats, pasta dishes, most vegetables, sauces, cheese, soups, stews, flavored milk drinks
80°C 830 MPa Whole potatoes, most vegetables
70°C 1,000 MPa All potato products, all vegetables, seafood
60°C 1,240 MPa Eggs, milk
Source: Richard S. Meyer, PhD, Washington Farms, Inc.
High hydrostatic pressure
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
11
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Two things must be done.
1. First, develop the kinetic information necessary to file a petition with the FDA and USDA. To do that, we have to select the most heat and pressure-resistant strain of Clostridium botulinum.
2. Second, we need commercial-size, inexpensive high-pressure vessels.
What's needed to commercialize UHP for sterilizing shelf-stable products?
High hydrostatic pressure
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
Thermally-assisted high-pressure lifts quality of shelf-stable foods
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Pressure(Mpa)
High hydrostatic pressure
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
Thermally-assisted high-pressure lifts quality of shelf-stable foods
ITP506/2018
12
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
High hydrostatic pressure
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
Thermally-assisted high-pressure lifts quality of shelf-stable foods
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
Any process, treatment, or combination thereof, that is applied to food to reduce the most resistant microorganism(s) of public health significance to a level that is not likely to present a public health risk under normal conditions of distribution and storage.
Suatu proses, perlakuan (atau kombinasi perlakuan) yang diaplikasikanpada produk pangan untuk mengurangi jumlah mikroba yang paling tahan (resistant) terhadap perlakuan (atau kombinasi perlakuan) yang diberikan dan berpotensi nyata mengancam kesehatan publik sampaijumlah akhir yang tidak lagi memberikan risiko terhadap kesehatanpublik jika produk disimpan dan didistribusikan pada kondisi normal
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
ITP506/2018
13
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
NACMCF recommends that:
• Regulatory agencies establish a Food Safety Objective (FSO) and/or a performance standardfor food/pathogen combinations that can be used as the basis for judging equivalency when a proposed process is evaluated as an alternative to traditional pasteurization.
SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS FOR ESTABLISHING THE EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
1. ”Suatu perlakukan (atau kombinasi perlakuan) .... ”
• Pasteurisasi bisa mencapai dua tujuan sekaligus, yaitu tujuan untuk memberikan perlindunganterhadap kesehatan publik dan tujuan memperpanjang umur simpan produk pangan. Namundemikian, pemilihan “suatu perlakukan (atau kombinasi perlakuan)” hendaknya didasarkan padapencapaian tujuan utama yaitu untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap kesehatan publik (menjamin keamanan pangan).
• Tujuan pasteurisasi dapat dicapai dengan kombinasi perlakukan terutama jika satu perlakuan saja tidak cukup untuk mencapai tujuan utamanya. Atau, satu perlakuan saja sebetulnya cukup untukmencapai tujuan utamanya tetapi akan menyebabkan perubahan mutu produk yang terlalu tinggiatau tidak dikehendaki.
• Secara tradisional proses perlakuan pasteurisasi adalah dengan panas sebagaimana yang banyakdiaplikasikan – terutama untuk pasteurisasi susu dan telur cair.
• Prinsip yang sama terutama yang terkait dengan model inaktiviasi termal mikroba, bisa digunakansebagai landasan merancang proses pasteurisasi dengan perlakuan lain tetapi masih berbasiskan pada termal yaitu perlakuan pasteurisasi dengan gelombang mikro (microwave), pemanasan ohmic (ohmic heating), maupun penggunaan uap panas (untuk pasteurisasi permukaan pangan padat).
• Untuk perlakuan selain panas, misalnya perlakuan tekanan tinggi (high pressure), radiasi UV dan iradiasi diperlukan model inaktivasi mikroba yang sesuai dan hal ini berbeda dengan model inaktivasi termal mikroba.
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
ITP506/2018
14
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
2. “…yang diaplikasikan pada produk pangan untuk mengurangi jumlah mikroba (atau
mikroba‐mikroba) …”
• Pengertian “mengurangi jumlah mikroba” pada definisi ini tidak hanya berarti menginaktivasi mikroba (bisa dengan panas, tekanan dan lain‐lain) tetapi juga dapat berarti mengurangi jumlah mikroba dengam cara filtrasi.
• Pada prinsipnya pengurangan jumlah secara total (absolut) tidak dapat dicapai karena secara mekanisme inaktivasi mikroba (juga secara peluang statistik), selalu ada peluangsatu mikroba yang tetap bertahan dalam produk, walaupun peluangnya sangat kecil(misalnya dalam 1 produk diantara 1,000,000 produk yang diproduksi), sehinggakeberadaan mikroba dalam produk ini tidak lagi mengancam kesehatan publik.
• Pada awalnya proses pasteurisasi ini dikembangkan dan diaplikasikan untuk produk pangan cair (minuman, misalnya pasteurisasi susu, sari buah, telur cair, dll), tetapisekarang banyak pula diaplikasikan pada produk pangan padat (misalnya sosis, hot dogs). Untuk produk pangan cair proses pasteurisasi harus dipastikan supaya setiappartikel produk menerima tingkat perlakuan yang cukup. Untuk produk pangan padat harus dipastikan bahwa setiap permukaan produk menerima tingkat perlakuan yang cukup.
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
3. “…(i) paling tahan (resistant) terhadap perlakuan (atau kombinasi perlakuan) yang
diberikan dan (ii) berpotensi nyata mengancam kesehatan publik …”
• Sebagaimana dinyatakan di atas, tujuan utama proses pasteurisasi adalah untukmemberikan perlindungan kesehatan publik. Karena alasan itu, maka mikroba target (microrganisms of concern) untuk proses pasteurisasi umumnya dikembangkanberdasarkan pada data epidemiologi yang berkaitan dengan produk pangan yang akandipasteurisasi.
• Mikroba target ini bisa mencakup bakteri, virus, dan parasit penyebab penyakitataupun pembentuk racun.
• Identifikasi mikroba (atau mikroba‐mikroba) target ini sangat dipengaruhi oleh sifatintrinsik mikroba (terutama sifat ketahanan dan jumlah awal mikroba) dan sifat produk pangan yang mempengaruhi pertumbuhan dan ketahanan mikroba (pH, aw, komposisigizi, dan lain‐lain).
• Pada umumnya, proses pasteurisasi dirancang untuk menginaktivasi (membunuh) ataumengurangi sel vegetatif patogen target, termasuk sel vegetatif pathogen pembentukspora. Namun demikian, pada kasus khusus tertentu proses pasteurisasi dapatdirancang untuk menginaktivasi spora misalnya spora Clostridium botulinum non‐proteolitik (psychrotrophic) pada daging kepiting atau rajungan (crabmeat).
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
ITP506/2018
15
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
4. “…jumlah akhir yang tidak lagi memberikan risiko terhadap kesehatan publik …”
• Risiko kesehatan publik merupakan fungsi dari jenis, jumlah awal dan kemampuan produk pangan untuk mempengaruhi pertumbuhan atau ketahanan patogen, serta kerentanan konsumen yang mengkonsumsinya.
• Keberadaan patogen pada produk pangan tidak serta merta memberikan risiko terhadap kesehatan publik (misalnya keberadaan patogen pembentuk spora pada produk pangan yang tidakcocok untuk pertumbuhan patogen tersebut).
• Jika produk pangan bersifat mendukung pertumbuhan patogen tertentu, maka lamanya masa simpan akan berpengaruh pada potensi risiko kesehatan publik. Misalnya mikroba pembentukspora kemungkinan tidak akan terbunuh pada proses pasteurisasi, tetapi jumlah atau populasinyadapat dikendalikan selama proses penyimpanan pada suhu rendah. Dengan demikian, lama penyimpanan produk pada suhu tinggi akan meningkatan potensi risiko kesehatan publik.
• Proses pasteurisasi tidak lagi dapat berfungsi memberikan perlindungan jika produk pangan mengalami pencemaran atau kontaminasi setelah proses pasteurisasi atau setelah kemasanproduk telah dibuka.
• Risiko kesehatan publik ini dipengaruhi oleh jumlah patogen pada produk dan jumlah dan frekuensi konsumsinya. Oleh karena itu penentuan “jumlah akhir yang tidak lagi memberikanrisiko terhadap kesehatan publik” juga harus mempertimbangkan data konsumsi (selain data epidemiologi).
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
5. “…produk disimpan dan didistribusikan pada kondisi normal.”
• Tujuan utama proses pasteurisasi adalah untuk memberikan perlindungan padakesehatan publik. Proses pasteurisasi tidak dirancang untuk membunuh mikrobasehingga produk menjadi awet pada suhu ruang.
• Industri harus memberikan spesifikasi suhu ”normal” penyimpanan yang disarankan, sehingga produk akan tetap aman. Umumnya produk pasteurisasi memerlukan penyimpanan pada suhu rendah (suhu refrigerasi) dengan persyaratan suhupenyimpanan yang tepat juga dipengaruhi oleh jenis produknya.
• Dalam hal ini proses pasteurisasi harus secara jelas dibedakan dengan dengan proses sterilisasi (sterilisasi komersial). Seperti telah dikemukakan tadi, bahwa produkpasteurisasi memerlukan penyimpanan refrigerasi sedangkan produk pangan sterilkomersial bersifat stabil pada suhu kamar (bersifat shelf stable). Walaupun demikian proses pasteurisasi dengan kombinasi perlakuan lain (misalnya pengendalian pH) dapatpula menghasilkan produk yang bersifat shelf stable.
NACMCF definition of ‘pasteurization’ :
ITP506/2018
16
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
• Conduct a hazard analysis to identify the microorganism(s) of public health concern for the food.
• Determine the most resistant pathogen of public health concern that is likely to survive the process.
• Assess the level of inactivation needed. Ideally, this would involve determining the initial cell numbers and normal variation in concentration that occurs before pasteurization.
• Consider the impact of the food matrix on pathogen survival.
• Validate the efficacy of the pasteurization process.
• Define the critical limits that need to be met during processing so that the food will meet the performance standard.
• Define the specific equipment and operating parameters for the proposed pasteurization process This may include developing specific Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) in addition to the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system.
NACMCF guidelines to developing a proposed pasteurization process :
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
= f (food‐pathogen combinations)
• Egg (liquid) 8.75‐log10 reduction of Salmonella
• Egg (in‐shell) 5‐log reduction of Salmonella
• Beef (e.g., cooked beef, roast beef, cooked corn beef, and cooked poultry products) 6.5‐log10 reduction of Salmonella
• Pultry 7‐log10 reduction of Salmonella.
• Fishery products 6‐log10 reduction of L. monocytogenes
• Crabmeat based on shelf life extension and significantly exceeds a 12‐log10 reduction of type E non‐proteolytic C. botulinum
• Juice 5‐log10 reduction of the most resistant microorganism of public health significance
NACMCF : Scientific criteria to determine if a process is
equivalent to pasteurization?
ITP506/2018
17
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Parameter ketahanan panas mikroba Coxiella burnetii,dengan nilai Z=4,34oC = 8oF (Ocerf and Condron, 2006).
= f (food‐pathogen combinations)
• Milk 6‐log10 reduction of Coxiella burnetii
NACMCF : Scientific criteria to determine if a process is
equivalent to pasteurization?
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Regulasi mengenai kecukupan proses pasteurisasi pada susu (the FDA Pasteurized Milk Ordinance by US FDA; NACMCF, 2006).
161
8 10 . = 15 detik
SUSU PASTEURISASI
NACMCF• Milk 6‐log10 reduction of Coxiella burnetii
ITP506/2018
18
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASI
US FDA (PMO, 21 CFR 1240.61)• Milk 6‐log10 reduction of Coxiella burnetii
1. In the case of thermal pasteurization of milk and milk products, the most resistant human pathogen known organism is C. burnetii.
2. The thermal process must be applied at levels of intensity that will inactivate the most resistant pathogen and assure the safety of the pasteurized milk or milk product.
3. The thermal process must be applied in properly designed and operated equipment, and is dependent on raw material quality.
4. There must be some means for regulators in those jurisdictions that are receiving the pasteurized milk and milk products to independently verify that the thermal process has been adequately applied*).
____________
*) In the case of milk and milk products, the phosphatase test is commonly used for this purpose.
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASI
US FDA (PMO, 21 CFR 1240.61)• Milk 6‐log10 reduction of Coxiella burnetii
• EQUIVALENCE OF PASTEURIZATION PROCESSES??
Processes other than thermal pasteurization, which are proposed to be applied to milk and milk products, must be recognized by FDA as equally efficient in the destruction of microbial organisms of public health significance.
ITP506/2018
19
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
• FAO/WHO (2004) defined pasteurization as “A microbiocidal heat treatment aimed at reducing the number of any pathogenic microorganisms in milk and liquid milk products, if present, to a level at which they do not constitute a significant health hazard.
• Pasteurization conditions are designed to effectively destroy the organisms Coxiella burnetii.
• Pasteurization was designed to achieve at least a 5-log reduction of C. burnetiiin whole milk.
• Pasteurization efficiency can be determined by Phosphatase test.
• Alkaline phosphatase, an enzyme naturally present in milk of all mammals have a thermal resistance greater than that of the most heat resistant non-spore-forming pathogens commonly found in milk its destruction confirms proper pasteurization
• Positive Phosphatase activity is the indicative of inadequate pasteurization or contamination of pasteurized milk with raw milk or post-process bacterial contamination.
SUSU PASTEURISASI
FAO/WHO (2004) :
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASI
Diskripsi
Susu pasteurisasi adalah susu segar, susu rekonstitusi, susu rekombinasi yang telah mengalami prosss pemanasan padatemperatur 63°C ‐66°C selama minimum 30 menit atau padapemanasan 72°C selama minimum 15 detik, kemudian segeradidinginkan sampai 10°C, selanjutnya diperlakukan secara aseptisdan disimpan pada suhu maksimum 4,4°C.
ITP506/2018
20
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASI
Diskripsi
Susu pasteurisasi adalah susu segar, susu rekonstitusi, susu rekombinasi yang telah mengalami
prosss pemanasan pada temperatur 63°C ‐66°C selama minimum 30 menit atau padapemanasan 72°C selama minimum 15 detik, kemudian segera didinginkan sampai 10°C,
selanjutnya diperlakukan secara aseptis dan disimpan pada suhu maksimum 4,4°C.
63°C, 30 menit72°C , 15 detik
• Sesuai dengan Pasteurized Milk Ordinance/PMO (US‐FDA)
• Ekivalen dengan penurunan Coxiellaburnetii sebesar 6 Log
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASI
CHECK: Microbiological Specifications for Foods
ITP506/2018
21
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
• Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment involves the application of high voltage (typically 20‐80 kV/cm) to foods placed between two electrodes.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
• Energy loss due to heating foods is minimized, reducing detrimental changes of the sensory and physical properties of foods.
• Destruction of microbial cells is the result of electroporation of cell membranes.
• The process can be static (batch) or continuous.
• Considerable data have been published that support the adequacy of PEF technology as a feasible pasteurization treatment for fluids.
• Inactivation as electromechanical instability in the cell membrane at a critical electric field strength increasing field strength correlated with increased leakage and the loss of ability to maintain pH homeostasis ‘fatal event’ is the membrane damage.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
ITP506/2018
22
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
NACMCF (2006)
1. What are the scientific criteria that should be used to determine if PEF
treatment is equivalent to pasteurization?
• Critical Product Characteristics:• Electrical conductivity, ionic strength, pH, water activity, particulate
size and content, viscosity• Critical equipment and operating parameters:
• Equipment design, including static (batch) versus continuous processing, • Flow rate (if applicable), pulse width, pulse frequency and duration,
and electrical field strength. • Additional hurdles?
• organic acids• ????
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
NACMCF (2006)
2. What is the most resistant microorganism of public health significance for
PEF treatment?
• Rotovirus is completely resistant to PEF processing, as it does not have a lipid membrane.
• Yeast cells are more susceptible to PEF treatment than bacterial cells
the most resistant strains of a pathogenic species must be identified for PEF process optimization and validation.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
ITP506/2018
23
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
NACMCF (2006)
3. What biological hazards might be created as a consequence of PEF
treatment?
• A potential consequence of sub‐lethal treatment of PEF cells that may later repair and multiply under storage conditions.
• Assurance of application of a critical electric field (Ec)
• At less than the critical level, damage is reversible
• Once a critical electric field (Ec) is applied, cells are essentially completely inactivated.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
Square pulse generator using a pulse-forming network of 3 capacitors inductor units and a voltage trace across the treatment chamber
ITP506/2018
24
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
ITP506/2018
25
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
KINETICS :
GENERAL• Intensity applied should be above the threshold electric field intensity, the critical electric field intensity for the target microorganism.
where: • DR= decimal reduction time at a reference electric field intensity (ER),
• z(E) = the increase in electric field intensity (E) required to reduce the decimal reduction time (D) by I‐log cycle at a specific temperature and pressure.
ITP506/2018
26
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
KINETICS :Lack of agreement among researchers on the best way to define the microbial inactivation kinetics of PEF processing.
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Microbial survival fraction as a function of (A) E, electric field and (B) t, treatment timeB = kinetic constants, subindex: e, electric field, t, time, c, critical.E is the critical electric field obtained by the extrapolated value of E for 100% survival.t is the critical treatment time obtained by the extrapolated value of t for 100% survival
A B
Critical electric field (Ec)
KINETICS :Lack of agreement among researchers on the best way to define the microbial inactivation kinetics of PEF processing.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
ITP506/2018
27
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
KINETICS :Lack of agreement among researchers on the best way to define the microbial inactivation kinetics of PEF processing.
t = treatment time, tc = critical treatment time, Ec= critical electric field intensity,and K = the kinetic constant.
K values calculated by fitting experimental data
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
KINETICS :Lack of agreement among researchers on the best way to define the microbial inactivation kinetics of PEF processing.
Onother model (Peleg, 1995):
where: • Ed= the electric field intensity when microbial population has
been reduced by 50%. • K = a coefficient with magnitude based on the slope of the
survivor curve obtained at several levels of electric field intensity.
S =
ITP506/2018
28
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF_____________
KINETICS :Lack of agreement among researchers on the best way to define the microbial inactivation kinetics of PEF processing.
Onother model (Peleg, 1995):
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF___ ~ Ekivalensi
How to assess “As Equally Efficicent”? Use of Microbiological Specification of Pasteurized Milk
ITP506/2018
29
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
The Performance Criterion (PC) could be defined as the effect on frequency and/or concentration of a hazard in a food that must be
achieved by the application of one or more control measures to provide or contribute to a Performance Objective (PO) or a FSO (NACMCF
2006).
In milk a FSO can be considered as achieving a low probability that a serving of milk contains a viable vegetative cell of a pathogen (e.g. < 1
cell per 1,000 servings), and a PC as a treatment sufficient to reduce the levels of C. burnettii by greater than 6-log cycles
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF___ ~ Ekivalensi
How to assess “As Equally Efficicent”? Use of Microbiological Specification of Pasteurized Milk
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Critical Process Factors and How they Impact Microbial Inactivation
Process factors a) Electric field intensity. b) Treatment time. c) Pulse waveshape. d) Treatment temperature.
Product factors a) Conductivity, pH, and ionic strength.b) Particulate foods. c) Hurdle approach.
Microbial factors a) Type of microorganismsb) Concentration ofmicroorganisms. c) Growth stage of microorganisms.
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF___ ~ Faktor Kritis
ITP506/2018
30
Hariyadi, P. 2018. Scientific Parameters for Establishing the Equivalence of Pasteurization Processes. ITP506
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
SUSU PASTEURISASIPEF___ ~ Faktor Kritis
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id
Terima kasih . . . . .
phariyadi.staff.ipb.ac.id